gratitude on being alive and aware - [PEACE] yo!
Awareness of self awareness, and the wonderousness of it all abounds for some. Many have sung gratitude for the reality of being and the abundance of existence itself, which is hereby echoed. Thank you one and all. Gratitude. Our passions, our Soul cries, our eternal search for fulfillment, meaning, love and connection. May your life be abundant and rich in experiences and may you find that which your Soul seeks for you. Peace y'all :) Be Thankful. At Least You’re Alive. Andrew Anglin Daily Stormer November 22, 2018 https://dailystormer.name/be-thankful-at-least-youre-alive/ It’s Thanksgiving. As always, I’m thankful for the honor of running this website, and thankful for all of the people who read it. I’m most thankful when I hear stories of how I’ve helped people. With women, with health, with motivation, with confidence, with whatever. I’m here to help. It’s more than I ever could have asked for, and I will be forever humbled by it. Beyond that, I am as always thankful for my family. This year, I’m especially thankful for Tucker Carlson. …
Re: of elephants and men, and scumbags
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:46:18 + (UTC) jim bell wrote: > > uh oh. So let's make clear what "the right" means. As Jim B. pointed > out, the left/right classification comes from the french revolution. What > needs to be added is that the people who sat on "the right" of the assembly > were the conservatives/monarchists/theocrats or representatives of the > 'ancien regime'. > That explains how it applied in France, in 1795 or so. I candidly admit I don't know the whole history of the use of those words but I never saw them used in political literature from the 19th century. If I had to guess, the terms became common in the 20th century. Regardless, the fact that monarchists sat on the right was abstracted and "the right" became a label for conservatives/monarchists. So it doesn't apply only to revolutionary france but to all conservatives/monarchists/theocrats. Now, if "the right' is the state-church-oligarchy, ancien regime, or powers that be, then people who oppose them must be on "the left", at least according to one simple interpretation. In the french case, the people who opposed the monarchy were a mix of socialists and fake libertarians, who wanted varying degrees of statism. Quite related fact : a few years before the french revolution there was a coup d'etat against the english monarchy in north america. This coup d'etat is known as the "american revolution" and was funded and supported by the french monarchy. Furthermore, more than a few particular fake libertarians(jefferson and co.) were involved in both the french and american 'revolutions'. So in the english colonies a bunch of criminals overthrew the english monarchy (so they were left wingers) with help from the french monarchy and founded a slave empire. So they were far right wingers... Coincidentally I wonder if children in the USA learn about the fact that the american coup d'etat was funded by the french. I further wonder if children in public schools are informed of the fact that public 'education' is socialism and political brainwashing. > > > > Now, key features of fascism are close cooperation between the 'private' > sector and government and nationalism-militarism, also known as imperialism. > Fascists usualy believe that they are god's chosen master race and that they > have a Manifest Destiny. In other words the old mercantilists from the > british empire and modern day fascists like the americunts are both 'right > wingers'. And actually modern day corporatists-imperialists are simply the > continuantion of 18th century imperialists. > I won't argue with this, now, except to point out that the so-understood > "leftist" dictatorships of the 20th century (usually based on Communism) > tended to have analogous beliefs. Not identical, of course, but analogous. > For example, Juan says: > "Fascists usualy believe that they are god's chosen master race and that they > have a Manifest Destiny." > My response is that "race" is fairly irrelevant: We can't choose our race. > It's not a "variable", and certainly not in the short-term. One could argue, > "What does it matter if one person believes, and even declares, that his race > is superior? Unless he tries to act on this belief in a hostile or otherwise > violent way, it is functionally irrelevant". Agreed, if a some people are racists and they just talk about it, then it's mostly irrelevant. But when lots of people are racists, like say, the germans, the jews, the americans, and similar imperialist assholes are, then racism becomes an important anti-libertarian factor. In the case of americans, so called 'liberals' actually don't give a fuck about racism OR are racists themselves. They pose as being against racism only for war propaganda purposes. Notice that the 'liberals' where the assholes promoting eugenics at the beginning of the 20th century. OOPS -they did that before hitler and co go figure... > Yet, you will notice today that most of the American Left obsesses about >"Nazis" (seemingly their chosen label for anyone who they have come to >dislike) who, they claim, believe themselves to be superior. My response is: >"Does it really matter what THEY believe about themselves? Is it relevant? >Is it significant? Of course racism is significant in the US. > As for "Manifest Destiny": Communists had the idea that their system would > inexorably spread around the world, destroying all other forms of government. > (So, that is indeed akin to a "Manifest Destiny".) Yes, that's my point. Commies and american fascists are close cousins. And I'd put the commies on the left, and the americans who think they have a 'manifest destiny' on the right. > Does anyone remember the stories about the Soviet Union, with its "5-year > plans"? Shoe factories, for instance, were ordered by "t
Re: of elephants and men, and scumbags
On 2018-11-23 04:46, jim bell wrote: This led me to the conclusion that in the limited area of dictatorships, there really isn't much difference between "left" and "right". These labels become fairly irrelevant. Pinochet kills three thousand commies, who previously wrecked the economy and terrorized the middle class, and are now trying to overthrow him. Restore order and prosperity. Demonized by the Western Media. King of Saudi Arabia kills one journalist, maintains order. Demonized by the western media. Burmese Government kills a few thousand Muslims, some of whom are terrorists, and the rest of whom are the cover that the terrorists hide among. Demonized by the western media. Vienam murders several hundred thousand capitalists. Western media love them. Looks to me that there is a difference between right wing dictators and left wing dictators.
Retpolines unnecessary
It is likely triggering one branch misprediction will avoid future branch predictions and instead cause a stall. Even if it isn’t, taking the opposite branch once before taking the desired one would leave many alterations to the local cache, unless in a thread on the same core is making some effort to measure which branch was used first. Simply flushing and using an lfence should prevent many issues and just cause a stall. It is funny on stackexchange that L1 and L2 caches (SRAM less vulnerable to radiation) is often disabled due to radiation, according to various askers. It is still bizarre that “AEX” masks registers before context switching out. It seems as if Intel is aware of an issue that they would be liable for. Side channel attacks obtaining information measured in the bits per millisecond or less is unimportant. There are still several “reserved” bits in CPUID, and buffer overreads or underreads, or non-linear overreads would negate many defenses. Possible that C++ could use a time consuming extension preventing parsers reading more than a kilobyte of data, although this would require extensive reprogramming to include it. Although a code review of parsers wouldn’t be bad either. “Mitigate spectre” Well, that solves one bug we’re aware of. What’s the zero day market for browsers again? Oh, right, RCE. RCE is a bit worse than... Spectre. The 1-day market could be impaired by delaying the inclusion of diffs of crash-causing or security bugs in the public code by waiting a day after releasing the binaries. (Although this might encourage monopolies so it should be socially fair to allow access to major downstream distributions) The GPL doesn’t say how timely everyone has to be, and I imagine doing things faster than it would take to make a request for the source code and responding would be legally sufficient. Anyway, the Grsec theory that because someone used an outdated version that it has to be restricted to paying customers is bonkers. I think you can legally call the Grsecurity Firm bonkers.
Re: of elephants and men, and scumbags
My comments inline:
On Tuesday, November 20, 2018, 11:45:27 PM PST, juan wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:04:56 +1000
jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> On 2018-11-21 12:39, juan wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:31:11 + (UTC)
> > jim bell wrote:
> >
> >
> >> In any case, I think that the 'convention' that we refer to "fascism" as
> >> being "right-wing" was, and is, completely phony.�
> >
> > so assuming that commies and nazis and other fascists are on the left,
> > who is on the right then?
>
> Whosoever wants to restore civilization against the darkness is on the
> right.
> uh oh. So let's make clear what "the right" means. As Jim B. pointed out,
the left/right classification comes from the french revolution. What needs to
be added is that the people who sat on "the right" of the assembly were the
conservatives/monarchists/theocrats or representatives of the 'ancien regime'.
That explains how it applied in France, in 1795 or so.
> Now, key features of fascism are close cooperation between the 'private'
sector and government and nationalism-militarism, also known as imperialism.
Fascists usualy believe that they are god's chosen master race and that they
have a Manifest Destiny. In other words the old mercantilists from the british
empire and modern day fascists like the americunts are both 'right wingers'.
And actually modern day corporatists-imperialists are simply the continuantion
of 18th century imperialists.
I won't argue with this, now, except to point out that the so-understood
"leftist" dictatorships of the 20th century (usually based on Communism) tended
to have analogous beliefs. Not identical, of course, but analogous. For
example, Juan says:
"Fascists usualy believe that they are god's chosen master race and that they
have a Manifest Destiny."
My response is that "race" is fairly irrelevant: We can't choose our race.
It's not a "variable", and certainly not in the short-term. One could argue,
"What does it matter if one person believes, and even declares, that his race
is superior? Unless he tries to act on this belief in a hostile or otherwise
violent way, it is functionally irrelevant". Yet, you will notice today that
most of the American Left obsesses about "Nazis" (seemingly their chosen label
for anyone who they have come to dislike) who, they claim, believe themselves
to be superior. My response is: "Does it really matter what THEY believe
about themselves? Is it relevant? Is it significant?
As for "Manifest Destiny": Communists had the idea that their system would
inexorably spread around the world, destroying all other forms of government.
(So, that is indeed akin to a "Manifest Destiny".)
Nevertheless that never happened, and it presumably didn't happen because
Communism was eventually revealed to be horribly flawed. Even by the late
1920's and mid-1930's, Russian Communists had begun murdering over a million
Kulaks (people who didn't want to give up their on personally-owned farms to
the collective.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulak From that article:
("The word kulak originally referred to independent farmers in the Russian
Empire who emerged from the peasantry and became wealthy following the Stolypin
reform, which began in 1906. The label of kulak was broadened in 1918 to
include any peasant who resisted handing over their grain to detachments from
Moscow.[1] During 1929–1933, Joseph Stalin's leadership of the total campaign
to collectivize the peasantry meant that "peasants with a couple of cows or
five or six acres more than their neighbors" were labeled "kulaks".[2]")
Another enormous flaw with Communism (and really, with all systems that purport
to be 'centrally-planned') is that it is virtually impossible to run an economy
by central control. I saw an essay once that discussed, as an example, the
food-distribution function in Manhattan. It explained that it was enormously
complex, and only 'worked' because all the components made their own decisions.
(Adam Smith's "Invisible Hand"). It was certainly not possible to do so in
the era before computers and Internet networking, and remains impossible today.
Does anyone remember the stories about the Soviet Union, with its "5-year
plans"? Shoe factories, for instance, were ordered by "the plan" to produce a
certain number (at least) of millions of pairs of shoes. Well, they did so,
but they tended to be of a small number of styles that many people didn't want!
Sure, they met 'the plan', but they didn't meet the wants and needs of the
public. Walk into any shoe store today, in America, and there are many
hundreds of styles, multiplied by dozens of sizes. A centrally-planned system
never could accomplish this.
China killed perhaps 20 million people in the "Great Leap Forward", a plan
which no doubt was intended to bring the prosperity that Mao saw in Western
nations. Ironically, now China is achieving
Re: of elephants and men, and scumbags
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:16:50 +1000 jam...@echeque.com wrote: > > > Corvee was typically one day a week working on the fields or some such. > > > Which is a lot less than I spend working for the government. > > On 2018-11-22 18:11, juan wrote: > > One day a week of slavery? cool. > > Way better than today's slavery. Well today's slavery is what fucktards like you have created. I don't understand why you keep whining about it. It's your own creation. And thanks to 'techy' fucktards like you and your 'science' we now enjoy a global surveillance police state which will soon put a radio transmitter in your brain. Or whatever passes for brain in your case. So, please go back to sucking trumpo's cock. That's all you can do. > > > >> The > >> ancient regime did not and could not send a generation off to Russia to > >> die. > > > oh, I'm sure there were no wars in the roman empire, in feudal europe > > and in monarchist europe > > No wars fought by conscript troops, stop lying, retard.
Re: of elephants and men, and scumbags
> Corvee was typically one day a week working on the fields or some such. > Which is a lot less than I spend working for the government. On 2018-11-22 18:11, juan wrote: One day a week of slavery? cool. Way better than today's slavery. The ancient regime did not and could not send a generation off to Russia to die. oh, I'm sure there were no wars in the roman empire, in feudal europe and in monarchist europe No wars fought by conscript troops, nor any wars with the horrifying casualty rates typical of modern wars fought with expendable conscript troops. except hyperinflation in france existed in the 18th century (that is almost 100 years before the revolution) There was the important difference that though John Law could inflate away the paper money in your pocket, he did not and could not try to force bakers to supply bread for worthless money, unlike Venezuela today and unlike Revolutionary France. what the fuck are you talking about. In Venezuela, and in Revolutionary France, the government enforces official maximum prices. When goods are not available at these prices, which they never are, the government proceeds to punish whosoever formerly produced goods. As a result, people went hungry in revolutionary France, and are going hungry in Venezuela.
Re: of elephants and men, and scumbags
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:50:54 +1000 jam...@echeque.com wrote: > >> On 2018-11-21 17:45, juan wrote: > >>> uh oh. So let's make clear what "the right" means. As Jim B. pointed > >>> out, the left/right classification comes from the french revolution. What > >>> needs to be added is that the people who sat on "the right" of the > >>> assembly were the conservatives/monarchists/theocrats or representatives > >>> of the 'ancien regime'. > > > On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:04:56 +1000 > > jam...@echeque.com wrote: > >> The ancient regime was theoretically absolute, and in an important sense > >> was absolute, but could not conscript, > > On 2018-11-22 16:56, juan wrote: > > excetp, of course it could > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corv%C3%A9e > > Corvee was typically one day a week working on the fields or some such. > Which is a lot less than I spend working for the government. One day a week of slavery? cool. > The > ancient regime did not and could not send a generation off to Russia to die. oh, I'm sure there were no wars in the roman empire, in feudal europe and in monarchist europe - hi hi hi. Seriously, what's the point of you vomiting one piece of nonsense after the other? what's the point of you constantly lying to yourself? How can you pretend to be so blind as to not see that your 'modern' government is the logical extension of the divine right of kings? > > except hyperinflation in france existed in the 18th century (that is > > almost 100 years before the revolution) > > > > > > http://austrianeconomics.wikia.com/wiki/John_Law_inflation_in_France > > There was the important difference that though John Law could inflate > away the paper money in your pocket, he did not and could not try to > force bakers to supply bread for worthless money, unlike Venezuela today > and unlike Revolutionary France. what the fuck are you talking about. > > >> Which gave us science, technology, industrialization, and empire. > > > > notice that's exactly what a 'progressive' socialist would say. > > But that is because they, and you, lie. what? - again you are a 'techno' fascist. You are the exact same sort of retard who thinks that the world should be ruled by a socialist 'artificial super intelligence'. here's a mirror for you https://www.thevenusproject.com/ > > Progressives have destroyed science, and socialists' attempts at > industrialization were second rate (reflect on soviet cars), relied on > buying or stealing technology developed by capitalists lol - you are a left-wing techno-fascist bot James. I challenge you to think for yourself and say anything at least half original. But the problem is, as either a lefty or a righ-winger, you are totally and completely unable to THINK. All you can do is repeat whatever program your masters put into you. > (soviet cars and > car factories were copied from the US under American engineers) and came > at horrifying human cost. sure sure
