Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 10:25:47 - "The Cuckq" wrote: > > > privacy activist cult > > TIL: privacy = cult fake privacy activist cult indeed, perfectly illustrated by brain dead scumbags like "The Cuckq"
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
The Grugq was an 0day reseller who transitioned to Infosec/Opsec bobblehead. Still maintaining close ties to the hand that feeds. On December 28, 2016 4:25:47 AM CST, The Cuckq wrote: >> the.grugq at gmail.com: >> panacea > >No shit. Prevention is the point of Tor, not damage mitigation, i.e., >"healing" > >> privacy activist cult > >TIL: privacy = cult > >> I got triggered > >What a fagq > >> strong security posture > >It is only posturing, isn't it > >> security (and/or privacy) > >Without security there is no privacy; isn't this guy a philosopher >king; wtf > >> VPN provides the same protections > >Bullshit, VPNs are guaranteed to fail > >Tor is at least a gamble, until trust-aware path selection enables a >better experience > >> Tor has only one use case to evade the authorities > >This fuckq with the pro-LEA false narratives > >> VPNs are (typically) not actively malicious > >Neither are "whites" > >> and you have no good reason to use it >> except as an evasion tool against state authorities > >Again with the false narratives > >> Tor Browser Bundle is the worst browser possible > >I guess he never used IE/Edge or Chrome > >What a newb > >> Anonymity is essentially a property of a system that ensures any user >> is equally likely to be the source of an event > >This guy is fucking retarded > >Not knowing who dun it doesn't mean it could be anybody > >> Diversity is obviously less good for anonymity > >Seeing a user as a regular Chrome, FF, or Safari user does more for >anonymity than Tor homogeneity > >> Global Passive Adversary > >It is clear that they are actively attacking people, why use inaccurate >labels -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 19:42:28 - "The Cuckq" vomited: > https://encyclopediadramatica.se/ that's where retarded, 8-year-old, 4-chan fascists get their 'science' eh.
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 07:42:28PM -, The Cuckq wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 28 2016 05:33:39 > > "juan" wrote: > > brain dead scumbags like "The Cuckq" > > lol > > Tor is for people[1] like you[2] > > [1]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/cuckoldry > [2]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/you Dude, you're a fucking moron. Taking the nick "cuck" and posting links to ED just kills anything you might have had to say. How did such a fucking moronic meme catch on? Probably because theres a bunch of fucking dipshit trump-loving losers out there who methinks doth protest too much about "niggers fucking their wives". Freudian fantasy slip? > > > > > > -- John signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:31:09 - "The Cuckq" wrote: > https://encyclopediadramatica.se/ You would expect the bot to half grasp the fact that he's nothing but his own sorry parody but no. It keeps posting the same broken link.
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 19:13:24 - "The Cuckq" wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 30 2016 10:37:02 > > "juan" >juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote: > > broken link > > Here are your fixed links lol: > > https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Asperger's_Syndrome > https://encyclopediadramatica.se/You > https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Cucks > > They are broken by auto case change and cloudflamer Thanks "The Cuckq" - You just made my point again, for the third time. Your "https://encyclopediadramatica.se"; link is broken. Just as broken as you are. So let me spell it out for you, you world champion of fucking retards : in my previous message and in this one I don't *literally* mean that the links are broken. It is a "poetic license". Look up what that means in 4-chan.
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:15:54 - "The Cuckq" wrote: hey, what does a scumbag like you do here, apart from trolling?
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 08:20:02PM -0500, John Newman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 07:42:28PM -, The Cuckq wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 28 2016 05:33:39 > > > "juan" wrote: > > > brain dead scumbags like "The Cuckq" > > > > lol > > > > Tor is for people[1] like you[2] > > > > [1]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/cuckoldry > > [2]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/you > > Dude, you're a fucking moron. Taking the nick "cuck" and posting links > to ED just kills anything you might have had to say. > > How did such a fucking moronic meme catch on? Probably because > theres a bunch of fucking dipshit trump-loving losers out there who > methinks doth protest too much about "niggers fucking their wives". > Freudian fantasy slip? > John I guess, with such diplorum and subtlety, you must be referring to, in your case, your frustating experiences watching not your wife, but your boyfriend when you came home early unannounced 14 years ago? Don't worry mate, you'll get over it one day ... perhaps when you're 88 and stuck in a rocking chair.
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
> On Dec 30, 2016, at 6:39 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 08:20:02PM -0500, John Newman wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 07:42:28PM -, The Cuckq wrote: On Wed, Dec 28 2016 05:33:39 "juan" wrote: brain dead scumbags like "The Cuckq" >>> >>> lol >>> >>> Tor is for people[1] like you[2] >>> >>> [1]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/cuckoldry >>> [2]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/you >> >> Dude, you're a fucking moron. Taking the nick "cuck" and posting links >> to ED just kills anything you might have had to say. >> >> How did such a fucking moronic meme catch on? Probably because >> theres a bunch of fucking dipshit trump-loving losers out there who >> methinks doth protest too much about "niggers fucking their wives". >> Freudian fantasy slip? >> John > > I guess, with such diplorum and subtlety, you must be referring to, in > your case, your frustating experiences watching not your wife, but your > boyfriend when you came home early unannounced 14 years ago? > > Don't worry mate, you'll get over it one day ... perhaps when you're 88 > and stuck in a rocking chair. Naturally the biggest bag of shit on the list comes in to defend the term cuck :) Your little fantasy is sweet. I hope you didn't get spunk on the keyboard while typing it out one handed.
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Dec 30, 2016 10:07 PM, "John Newman" wrote: > > > On Dec 30, 2016, at 6:39 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > > I guess, with such diplorum and subtlety, you must be referring to, in your case, your frustating experiences watching not your wife, but your boyfriend when you came home early unannounced 14 years ago? > > > > Don't worry mate, you'll get over it one day ... perhaps when you're 88 and stuck in a rocking chair. > > Naturally the biggest bag of shit on the list comes in to defend the term cuck :) > > Your little fantasy is sweet. I hope you didn't get spunk on the keyboard while typing it out one handed. Oh, in _his_ case, it's NOT 'mottainai'... :P
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 08:07:20PM -0500, John Newman wrote: > > > On Dec 30, 2016, at 6:39 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 08:20:02PM -0500, John Newman wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 07:42:28PM -, The Cuckq wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28 2016 05:33:39 > "juan" wrote: > brain dead scumbags like "The Cuckq" > >>> > >>> lol > >>> > >>> Tor is for people[1] like you[2] > >>> > >>> [1]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/cuckoldry > >>> [2]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/you > >> > >> Dude, you're a fucking moron. Taking the nick "cuck" and posting links > >> to ED just kills anything you might have had to say. > >> > >> How did such a fucking moronic meme catch on? Probably because > >> theres a bunch of fucking dipshit trump-loving losers out there who > >> methinks doth protest too much about "niggers fucking their wives". > >> Freudian fantasy slip? > >> John > > > > I guess, with such diplorum and subtlety, you must be referring to, in > > your case, your frustating experiences watching not your wife, but your > > boyfriend when you came home early unannounced 14 years ago? > > > > Don't worry mate, you'll get over it one day ... perhaps when you're 88 > > and stuck in a rocking chair. > > Naturally the biggest bag of shit on the list comes in to defend the term > cuck :) No "term" needs defending - either it's useful or not. Your choice words on the other hand are fit for the New York Times. Nice to see you didn't get triggered by my response, and didn't divert the point either. Might be labelled a shill otherwise ...