Re: no anon conversations?
An Metet wrote: What technologies currently exist for receiving a/psuedononymous message? With Mixmaster, sending mail, posting news, and even blog posting are possible, However, receiving replies securely or, better, holding a private conversation is difficult or impossible. Best bet seems is to encrypt and spam somewhere very public? Ugly, ugly. No technological method, just a few trust me remailers. Other options? Mixminion offers a basic building block called SURBs, Single User Reply Blocks. http://mixminion.net/ http://mixminion.net/minion-spec.txt There is a draft spec. for a nymserver which uses this building block but I've seen no news of an ongoing implementation: http://mixminion.net/nym-spec.txt Mixminion installation still indicates that anonymity is still not available, due to traffic levels still being too low. The mailing list discussed current traffic levels recently: http://archives.seul.org/mixminion/dev/Apr-2004/msg1.html
Re: Is there a Brands certificate reference implementation?
Steve Furlong wrote: Does anyone know of a reference implementation for Stefan Brands's digital certificate scheme? Alternatively, does anyone have an email address for Brands so I can ask him myself? (I haven't gotten anything back from ZKS's contact us address. But I don't know if Brands is still at ZKS.) He started a new company called Credentica. http://archives.abditum.com/cypherpunks/C-punks20020603/0053.html http://www.credentica.com/
Re: Sunny Guantanamo (Re: Speaking of the Geneva convention)
On Friday 19 December 2003 20:35, James A. Donald wrote: In fact Glaspie told Saddam that if he invaded Kuwait, the shit would hit the fan. (That was not her words. Her words were subject of concern, Cite? The google groups article you linked to has two links to possible transcripts. Neither back up your claim.
Re: I am anti war. You stupid evil scum are pro Saddam.
On Monday 22 December 2003 13:49, Michael Kalus wrote: Well, in america instead of being the slave to the man (just yet) you're the slave to your credit card bills By choice. your employers By choice, through a range that is barely enough to eat and drink to unimaginable heights in historical terms. and all the other robber barons you have in the industry, while under Castro you are Well what? You can't travel to the US? You are not necessarily always able to state your political opinions (which sound vaguely familiar in the US right now) etc. Not even close to the US situation. Get a clue. A simple example, read Tim May's continued expressions on the state of the US. Now read this about Cuba: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/05/67973.html Now, tell me that you still think the US is less free. Repeat after me: Freedom is something that is defined differently by every human being. So Cuban's choose oppression and no free speech, in exchange for freedom of slavery to credit-card spending on luxury items, employment and robber barons? Have you been to Cuba?
Re: Drunken US Troops Kill Rare Tiger
On Monday 22 September 2003 12:37 pm, Sarad AV wrote: Vote for some one who promises freedom,democracy These two don't co-exist too well if you're idle.
