Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

2003-01-16 Thread Morlock Elloi
>The whole "Cell Phones - The Next Generation" thing
>has been a pure marketing scam from the beginning.

Experience demonstrates that any term with "generation" in it is pure BS,
technically and financially.

Most advances in technology are illusions created by dumbing down of the
populace.


=
end
(of original message)

Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows:
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com




Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

2003-01-14 Thread A.Melon
Bill Stewart said: 

> At 12:31 PM 01/14/2003 -0800, Tim May wrote:
> >I saw mention on the Yahoo news site that some health clubs and
> >gyms are already taking steps to limit the types of cellphones
> >allowed in the changing areas (and maybe elsewhere).
>
> Hey, some people get their privacy by going to places that
> have Rules about the kind of video-broadcast technology that's allowed,
> some people build it using Technology like cell-phone jammers,
> while others of us accomplish it by having figures that
> nobody's going to bother photographing :-)

Unless you are being rebirthed by a home applicance.

http://pics.nikita.ca/artificial-gravity/bill.jpg




Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

2003-01-14 Thread Bill Stewart
... and they lie about it being 3G (which doesn't exist yet.)


It's a CDMA2000 phone which is 3G.

3G networks exist in many parts of the world, although behind schedule in 
other parts.

The whole "Cell Phones - The Next Generation" thing
has been a pure marketing scam from the beginning.
It's a popular well-funded scam that got lots of mindshare
because it promised lots of people marketshare dominance
or other political advantages, that they haven't executed well.

But it makes a bunch of assumptions that the world can,
will, and should have the same cellphone standard everywhere,
and that the marketing people coming up with the term
know what it is because they work for the people who are
[pick hackneyed phrase here:
A: the powerful beings creating the One Ringtone To Rule Them All,
B: inevitably, scientific-central-planningally historically destined
C: The Phone Company which is really in charge of everything
D: the capitalist oligopoly conning our democratic central planners
]
which everybody in the world will buy into, including
manufacturers, system operators, regulators, and
last and certainly least, those enthusiastic customers,
and we'll all make scandalously high profits while
giving consumers what we _know_ they want to pay tons of money for,
because we know that the technology developers are ready
to ship this stuff Real Soon Now, at the right price point,

And of course, it assumes that everybody will believe that
the products _these_ marketing people are trying to sell are
the ones that will win, as opposed to the other technology developers
who are making obviously substandard products unworthy of becoming
CellPhones: TNG, and if somehow one of those other developers
gets deployed in some significant market, they'll not only
be stuck with some hackneyed name like "2.5G", but consumers
will realize that those competing technologies are just opportunists
who'll be Left Behind By Progress, so they either won't buy it
or at least the wireless companies will dump it for
Better Stuff Real Soon, or at least if there's more than one
cell-phone company in an area, if the first one buys the 2.5G stuff,
anybody else coming in with 3G can steal their customers.

They're also depending on it taking long enough for 3G to get deployed
and paid for and achieve World Domination
that nobody's going to sneak in and call _their_ stuff 4G.

In practice, the real issues seem to be how fast a data channel
is available, with the interesting values being 9600, 56k, 384k, 2M,
how much spectrum space gets burned supporting it,
how much distance you get for the voice and data cells,
which standards interfere with which other standards,
whether voice gets handled as something special or as data,
whether data gets handled as something special like WAP
or left as open-standard IP with TCP or UDP and HTTP,
with or without being forced through filters or
able to be sent through optional filters,
how to integrate data transmission with texting
(e.g. texting using ad-hoc telco standards or internet standards),
how much jitter the data has (low values make VOIP possible),
who's in charge of each of these services,
which is to say "who gets how much of the money, if any",
and how to get teenagers to have to buy it to be cool.
These aren't the kind of things that easily fit into one linear
range of values, and doing so is marketing scam.




Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

2003-01-14 Thread Bill Stewart
At 11:39 PM 01/13/2003 -0800, Tim May wrote:

Hardly Brinworld. And T-Mobile has had it for awhile.

Why is warmed-over technology news given headlines?


Because all of us phone company stockholders hope maybe
warmed-over headlines will get them to buy the stuff this time?

Less cynically, though, some of the newer technology is making
this a bit more practical - data speeds on cell phones are
getting fast enough that if they've designed the phones right,
you can get at least CU-SeeMe quality video and maybe better,
with 64kbps, and ostensibly 384kbps which lets you do a bit better
than just talking heads video, as opposed to most of the earlier
cellphones-with-still-cameras.   (Of course, if they're charging
you by the minute, you're not likely to do much of this,
though some of the cellphone companies have figured out that
they really should be selling flat-rate data.)
But it's a start.




Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

2003-01-14 Thread Bill Stewart
At 12:31 PM 01/14/2003 -0800, Tim May wrote:

I saw mention on the Yahoo news site that some health clubs and
gyms are already taking steps to limit the types of cellphones
allowed in the changing areas (and maybe elsewhere).


Hey, some people get their privacy by going to places that
have Rules about the kind of video-broadcast technology that's allowed,
some people build it using Technology like cell-phone jammers,
while others of us accomplish it by having figures that
nobody's going to bother photographing :-)




Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

2003-01-14 Thread Steve Mynott
On Tuesday, Jan 14, 2003, at 07:56 Europe/London, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:


On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tim May wrote:


Samsung unveil new 3G camcorder phone
http://www.3gnewsroom.com/3g_news/jan_03/news_2906.shtml


Hardly Brinworld. And T-Mobile has had it for awhile.

Why is warmed-over technology news given headlines?


Because Samsung are trying to sell phones.


... and they lie about it being 3G (which doesn't exist yet.)


It's a CDMA2000 phone which is 3G.

3G networks exist in many parts of the world, although behind schedule 
in other parts.

--
Steve Mynott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



3G Phones (was: Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone)

2003-01-14 Thread Meyer Wolfsheim
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Steve Mynott wrote:

> > ... and they lie about it being 3G (which doesn't exist yet.)
>
> It's a CDMA2000 phone which is 3G.
>
> 3G networks exist in many parts of the world, although behind schedule
> in other parts.

Hmm. I actually can't find any specs on that phone's max speed. The
CDMA2000 service being offered by Sprint and Verison in the US does not
meet the criteria for 3G.

CDMA2000 1x as defined by the ITU is, a 3G standard. Keep in mind,
however, that in order to be 3G by the ITU definition, a standard needs to
deliver data rates of a minimum of 144 Kbps.

The top speed I've seen advertised for CDMA2000 deployments is 70 Kbps. Is
CDMA2000 being used outside North America? I thought GSM/GPRS was the
dominant standard in Europe and Asia. (GPRS is never 3G.)


-MW-




Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

2003-01-14 Thread Tim May
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 08:49  AM, Major Variola (ret) wrote:


At 01:38 AM 1/14/03 -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:

data speeds on cell phones are
getting fast enough that if they've designed the phones right,
you can get at least CU-SeeMe quality video and maybe better,
with 64kbps, and ostensibly 384kbps
But it's a start.


Its pretty common to see a "reporter" holding a cell phone up to a
talking head surrounded by more conventional microphones, tape
recorders.

When a major news medium first uses a video snip recorded from a phone
at the
scene, the Brinworld clock will have advanced another second.

And then some Nokia yahoo will introduce some more interesting features
that
used to be found in $10K specialized video/recording equiptment
* snap a frame if something moves (security)
* FIFO the last N seconds
* low light/IR/frame accumulate
etc.
making the 7segment LED Brinworld clock blick closer to midnight.



I saw mention on the Yahoo news site that some health clubs and gyms 
are already taking steps to limit the types of cellphones allowed in 
the changing areas (and maybe elsewhere).

--Tim May



Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

2003-01-14 Thread Tim May
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 02:09  PM, R. A. Hettinga wrote:


--- begin forwarded text


Status: RO
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:40:28 -0500
To: undisclosed-recipient:;
From: Monty Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

Samsung unveil new 3G camcorder phone
http://www.3gnewsroom.com/3g_news/jan_03/news_2906.shtml


Hardly Brinworld. And T-Mobile has had it for awhile.

Why is warmed-over technology news given headlines?

--Tim May




Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

2003-01-14 Thread Meyer Wolfsheim
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tim May wrote:

> > Samsung unveil new 3G camcorder phone
> > http://www.3gnewsroom.com/3g_news/jan_03/news_2906.shtml
>
> Hardly Brinworld. And T-Mobile has had it for awhile.
>
> Why is warmed-over technology news given headlines?

... and they lie about it being 3G (which doesn't exist yet.)


-MW-




Re: Brinworld: Samsung SCH-V310 camcorder phone

2003-01-14 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 01:38 AM 1/14/03 -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> data speeds on cell phones are
>getting fast enough that if they've designed the phones right,
>you can get at least CU-SeeMe quality video and maybe better,
>with 64kbps, and ostensibly 384kbps
>But it's a start.

Its pretty common to see a "reporter" holding a cell phone up to a
talking head surrounded by more conventional microphones, tape
recorders.

When a major news medium first uses a video snip recorded from a phone
at the
scene, the Brinworld clock will have advanced another second.

And then some Nokia yahoo will introduce some more interesting features
that
used to be found in $10K specialized video/recording equiptment
* snap a frame if something moves (security)
* FIFO the last N seconds
* low light/IR/frame accumulate
etc.
making the 7segment LED Brinworld clock blick closer to midnight.