Re: [darktable-user] open CL 2.0.6
There was a thread on the -dev list with someone else having slowness on Ubuntu 16.04 with OpenCL on nVidia and it looked like a driver issue. They switched from version 361 of the nVidia driver to 340 and saw an improvement, might be worth trying. Thread here: https://www.mail-archive.com/darktable-dev@lists.darktable.org/msg01176.html darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-user] Fuji X T10 lens correction or ?
Hi, when i edit raw image it looks different than original jpeg from cam. https://postimg.org/image/xcheiwp7d/ https://postimg.org/image/gd8g3ndzt/ First is crop from raw, second is crop from jpeg, All from DT. So it's lens correction problem, or ? Do you have same behaviour ? Thank you Martin darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-user] 360 degree panoramas
Is there a way to do 360 degree panoramas with darktable like this one: http://tinyurl.com/35tfq9q ? HOw would you recommend I create one? darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
re: [darktable-user] Fuji X T10 lens correction or ?
Hello, For what I know, camera manufacturers tend to add some (useless) processing to their JPEGs. And I think this is the same kind of behaviour with inkjet manufacturers, when they add porcessing to the printouts in photo mode. This processing is meant to feat the taste of a panel of people who were asked to. Most of the time, those people like flashy colours rather than softer but more realistic ones. I had a similar discussion with a professional photographer whom I showed 3 photos : - the first one, as from the camera JPEG - the second one, with (as as possible) accurate colours - then, the third, with colour saturation accentuation. I asked him to tell me which was which, and it didn't take more than 3 seconds to sort them. But, he added, his customers prefer photos of the first or even third kind (JPEGs from the camera) rather than those of the second, so he always adds saturation to his photos. Which I personally don't like at all... but I am not 99% of the customers. Would you be surprised if I tell you that I prefer the raw sample ? I find it more accurate, and it shows more details in shadows. But, once again, I am not... J.-Luc > Message du 13/09/16 19:48 > De : "komodo" > A : darktable-user@lists.darktable.org > Copie à : > Objet : [darktable-user] Fuji X T10 lens correction or ? > > Hi, > > when i edit raw image it looks different than original jpeg from cam. > > https://postimg.org/image/xcheiwp7d/ > > https://postimg.org/image/gd8g3ndzt/ > > First is crop from raw, second is crop from jpeg, > > All from DT. > > So it's lens correction problem, or ? Do you have same behaviour ? > > Thank you > > Martin > > > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-user] Fuji X T10 lens correction or ?
Hi Martin, this is a firmware problem from v1.00. It got updated with v1.01 have a look here: http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digital_cameras/software/firmware/x/xt10/history.html I also have a XT-10 and experienced the same problem, after the firmware update everything worked as expected... therefore it's not a problem of darktable but from the stock-firmware of the XT-10. HTH Cheers, Martin On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:15 PM Jean-Luc CECCOLI < jean-luc.cecc...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > Hello, > > For what I know, camera manufacturers tend to add some (useless) > processing to their JPEGs. > And I think this is the same kind of behaviour with inkjet manufacturers, > when they add porcessing to the printouts in photo mode. > This processing is meant to feat the taste of a panel of people who were > asked to. > Most of the time, those people like flashy colours rather than softer but > more realistic ones. > I had a similar discussion with a professional photographer whom I showed > 3 photos : > - the first one, as from the camera JPEG > - the second one, with (as as possible) accurate colours > - then, the third, with colour saturation accentuation. > I asked him to tell me which was which, and it didn't take more than 3 > seconds to sort them. > But, he added, his customers prefer photos of the first or even third kind > (JPEGs from the camera) rather than those of the second, so he always adds > saturation to his photos. > Which I personally don't like at all... but I am not 99% of the customers. > > Would you be surprised if I tell you that I prefer the raw sample ? I find > it more accurate, and it shows more details in shadows. > But, once again, I am not... > > > > J.-Luc > > > > > > > Message du 13/09/16 19:48 > > De : "komodo" > > A : darktable-user@lists.darktable.org > > Copie à : > > Objet : [darktable-user] Fuji X T10 lens correction or ? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > when i edit raw image it looks different than original jpeg from cam. > > > > https://postimg.org/image/xcheiwp7d/ > > > > https://postimg.org/image/gd8g3ndzt/ > > > > First is crop from raw, second is crop from jpeg, > > > > All from DT. > > > > So it's lens correction problem, or ? Do you have same behaviour ? > > > > Thank you > > > > Martin > > > > > > > darktable user mailing list > > to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > > > > > > > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-user] open CL 2.0.6
I find it strange... When I upgraded from 14.04 to 16.04 - DT was at version 2.0.5 and nvidia 361. I actually experienced speed "gain" - did not clock it but it was very noticeable. I worked in this state for several weeks - all happy, no changes in settings to DT. 2.0.6 was installed on 2016-09-06. I noticed it works but did not test any further. Then I didn't use the computer till 11th. Installed the following updates 2016-09-11 19:56:16 status installed gnome-menus:amd64 3.13.3-6ubuntu3.1 2016-09-11 19:56:16 status installed desktop-file-utils:amd64 0.22-1ubuntu5 2016-09-11 19:56:17 status installed mime-support:all 3.59ubuntu1 2016-09-11 19:56:17 status installed bamfdaemon:amd64 0.5.3~bzr0+16.04.20160701-0ubuntu1 2016-09-11 19:56:17 status installed man-db:amd64 2.7.5-1 2016-09-11 19:56:18 status installed libc-bin:amd64 2.23-0ubuntu3 2016-09-11 19:56:18 status installed dbus:amd64 1.10.6-1ubuntu3 2016-09-11 19:56:18 status installed gconf2:amd64 3.2.6-3ubuntu6 2016-09-11 19:56:18 status installed hicolor-icon-theme:all 0.15-0ubuntu1 2016-09-11 19:56:18 status installed libglib2.0-0:i386 2.48.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1 2016-09-11 19:56:18 status installed libglib2.0-0:amd64 2.48.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1 2016-09-11 19:56:18 status installed sgml-base:all 1.26+nmu4ubuntu1 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed google-chrome-stable:amd64 53.0.2785.101-1 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed libp11-kit0:amd64 0.23.2-5~ubuntu16.04.1 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed libp11-kit0:i386 0.23.2-5~ubuntu16.04.1 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed p11-kit-modules:amd64 0.23.2-5~ubuntu16.04.1 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed libaccountsservice0:amd64 0.6.40-2ubuntu11.2 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed accountsservice:amd64 0.6.40-2ubuntu11.2 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed file-roller:amd64 3.16.5-0ubuntu1.2 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed gnome-font-viewer:amd64 3.16.2-1ubuntu1 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed libappstream-glib8:amd64 0.5.13-1ubuntu3 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed libimlib2:amd64 1.4.7-1ubuntu0.1 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed metacity-common:all 1:3.18.7-0ubuntu0.1 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed libmetacity-private3a:amd64 1:3.18.7-0ubuntu0.1 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed libnm-gtk-common:all 1.2.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.4 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed libnm-gtk0:amd64 1.2.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.4 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed libnma-common:all 1.2.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.4 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed libnma0:amd64 1.2.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.4 2016-09-11 19:56:19 status installed network-manager-gnome:amd64 1.2.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.4 2016-09-11 19:56:21 status installed snapd:amd64 2.14.2~16.04 2016-09-11 19:56:21 status installed p11-kit:amd64 0.23.2-5~ubuntu16.04.1 2016-09-11 19:56:21 status installed libc-bin:amd64 2.23-0ubuntu3 and noticed drop in performance - mainly when using darktable (not much light table). Took a chance to turn off open CL and the performance improved. After reading the thread https://www.mail-archive.com/darktable-dev@lists.darktable.org/msg01176.html Tried to compare with export of a single image. without open CL - 23s for about 20 MB RAW. Same image - no change with open CL - 41s The OS and the images are stored on SSD so the networking does not come into play. I can work without open CL - it is not a deal breaker but the behavior is surprising. Regards, B On 2016-09-13 03:04 AM, Jonathan Niehof wrote: There was a thread on the -dev list with someone else having slowness on Ubuntu 16.04 with OpenCL on nVidia and it looked like a driver issue. They switched from version 361 of the nVidia driver to 340 and saw an improvement, might be worth trying. Thread here: https://www.mail-archive.com/darktable-dev@lists.darktable.org/msg01176.html darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-user] Darktable 2.0.6 dmg?
Hello All, I feel that I’m looking a gift horse into the mouth but, I’ll ask nonetheless: Is a 2.0.6 dmg package available yet? I’ve looked but could only find the 2.0.5 (which I’m already running on my MBPr) signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
[darktable-user] Horizontal v Vertical
Arch with DT 2.0.6 (I upgraded today). Looks good, especially the css to be able to select the filename (right the right click) and copy it. Is there a way of selecting the images that are horizontals or verticals? I want to redo my frame & watermark. But the position of the watermark is slightly different on horizontal images from the vertical images. So I have 2 styles/preset that I apply at the export... Thanks -- sknahT vyS darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-user] tethering and size of center view image
Hello, sory for my bad english, I use Darktable 2.0.5 with Debian Stretch and KDE 5 my APN is Nikon D800 when I use tethering the size of the center view image is very little and does not occupy all the space possible I don't find how config this some ideas ? gerard darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
