Re: [DataMapper] Re: newbie questions
On Dec 1, 2012, at 7:30 AM, solnic wrote: Hey Perry, DM1 implements Active Record pattern so there's no big difference between DM1 and ActiveRecord in Rails from the app's design point of view. You *can* separate persistence concerns from domain logic using either DM1 or AR; however, it adds a lot of extra work so you should really think if that's what you need. It's also probably worth to mention that DM1's development is no longer very active. We're busy working on the next major version of DM which implements Data Mapper pattern and that's probably something you're looking for unfortunately it's not finished yet. If you want to learn about DM 2.0 you can check out my slides from RubyShift conf: https://speakerdeck.com/solnic/datamapper-2-an-object-mapping-toolkit Thank you immensely. Things make much more sense now. It was DM 2.0 that was being mentioned in the other sources. Is it too early to use DM 2? As I said, my current project is mostly to learn. I'd be more than happy to piddle and play and provide some feedback. I usually use Postgres Thank you again, Perry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DataMapper group. To post to this group, send email to datamapper@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to datamapper+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
Re: [DataMapper] Re: newbie questions
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 4:17:10 PM UTC+1, Perry Smith wrote: On Dec 1, 2012, at 7:30 AM, solnic wrote: Hey Perry, DM1 implements Active Record pattern so there's no big difference between DM1 and ActiveRecord in Rails from the app's design point of view. You *can* separate persistence concerns from domain logic using either DM1 or AR; however, it adds a lot of extra work so you should really think if that's what you need. It's also probably worth to mention that DM1's development is no longer very active. We're busy working on the next major version of DM which implements Data Mapper pattern and that's probably something you're looking for unfortunately it's not finished yet. If you want to learn about DM 2.0 you can check out my slides from RubyShift conf: https://speakerdeck.com/solnic/datamapper-2-an-object-mapping-toolkit Thank you immensely. Things make much more sense now. It was DM 2.0 that was being mentioned in the other sources. Is it too early to use DM 2? As I said, my current project is mostly to learn. I'd be more than happy to piddle and play and provide some feedback. I usually use Postgres It is too early. If things go well we will release an alpha in December and it'll be perfect time for testing things out and providing feedback :) Currently development takes place in https://github.com/solnic/dm-mapper and https://github.com/mbj/dm-session. cheers # solnic -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DataMapper group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/datamapper/-/gbzcjr2qQ_cJ. To post to this group, send email to datamapper@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to datamapper+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
Re: [DataMapper] Re: newbie questions
On Dec 1, 2012, at 10:31 AM, solnic wrote: Currently development takes place in https://github.com/solnic/dm-mapper and https://github.com/mbj/dm-session. By the way, the session looks very similar (to me) to Context in DCI. I'm liking a lot of what I'm seeing. Good luck! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DataMapper group. To post to this group, send email to datamapper@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to datamapper+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
