Re: arago and oe : synchronization
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 02:35:54PM +0100, Raffaele Recalcati wrote: > I have a setup pointing to > git://arago-project.org/git/arago-oe-dev.git > > I made a patch starting from > cf46225e7b238c49fca39ad1902bd9393c812441 > of master branch. > > I'm search inside > git://git.openembedded.net/openembedded > amd also (but should be the same) > http://repo.or.cz/r/openembedded.git > > this commit. > I don't find it. > > What kind of tracking is present between arago and oe? Raffaele, 1. This is the wrong mailing list for your question above. Please use arago-devel mailing list instead. 2. arago-oe-dev is a verified and tested snapshot of org.openembedded.dev and usually slightly behind it. 3. The commit ID you mentioned[1] refers to a merge commit and hence does not exist in upstream OE. Every time the snapshot is taken, this merge commit is made to mark the point of the snapshot. The commit right before it (also referred as a parent[2] of the merge) is where the snapshot was taken from OE and does indeed exist in org.openembedded.dev. [1] http://arago-project.org/git/?p=arago-oe-dev.git;a=commit;h=cf46225e7b238c49fca39ad1902bd9393c812441 [2] http://arago-project.org/git/?p=arago-oe-dev.git;a=commit;h=3bcf3726467d678126952436b80f4a10c2184c4d -- Denys ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Re: 3.00 git seems to be corrupted
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:55:04PM +0100, Andrea Gasparini wrote: > Hi Rovanion , > > > I was going to fetch the 3.0 release of the Linux Kernel for the DaVinci > > processor. > > 3.0 ?? > I'm not aware of a 3.0 version of the linux kernel, are you sure of what > you did? > > > I'm really no pro on git, so why is this? > > could you please tell us the command that bring to such an error? Apparently, the original message was about the staging linux-davinci tree (PSP 3.0) at arago-project.org. There was a problem with the server, which resulted in intermittent OOM conditions. It is resolved now, sorry for inconvenience. -- Denys ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Re: git merge pb: solved
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:00:59AM +0100, Raffaele Recalcati wrote: > I'm starting the work with dm365. > First of all some tests on evm and, in a couple of months, with my > customized board. > I've found a little error in instructions. > > recalc...@recalcati-laptop:/app/opt/sources/DM365_TI_PSP/OE$ git clone > -n git://arago-project.org/git/arago.git > Initialized empty Git repository in > /app/opt/sources/DM365_TI_PSP/OE/arago/.git/ > remote: Counting objects: 5240, done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (3620/3620), done. > remote: Total 5240 (delta 3406), reused 2431 (delta 1474) > Receiving objects: 100% (5240/5240), 3.22 MiB | 72 KiB/s, done. > Resolving deltas: 100% (3406/3406), done. > recalc...@recalcati-laptop:/app/opt/sources/DM365_TI_PSP/OE$ cd arago/ > recalc...@recalcati-laptop:/app/opt/sources/DM365_TI_PSP/OE/arago$ git > checkout DEV.DaVinciPSP.03.01.00.26 > error: Entry 'recipes/arago/arago-feed-configs.bb' would be > overwritten by merge. Cannot merge. Works here with latest PSP 03.01 tags and git 1.6.3.3 If git does not allow you to checkout a specific tag, you may want to reset your local tree first with "git reset --hard HEAD" and then checkout... > recalc...@recalcati-laptop:/app/opt/sources/DM365_TI_PSP/OE/arago$ git pull > Already up-to-date. > > So: > git checkout HEAD > > Than: > git log --follow recipes/arago/arago-feed-configs.bb > commit 9237bed772b1f43296a3512353817791ac170fd4 > Author: Denys Dmytriyenko > Date: Tue Oct 20 21:26:04 2009 -0400 > > arago-feed-configs: fix generation of feeds for da850 > > commit ccc45369ac24677579cd7db7350375bac924d20c > Author: Denys Dmytriyenko > Date: Sun Sep 20 00:46:26 2009 -0400 > > And: > git show DEV.DaVinciPSP.03.01.00.26:recipes/arago/arago-feed-configs.bb > .. > --> seems ok. > > > recalc...@recalcati-laptop:/app/opt/sources/DM365_TI_PSP/OE/arago$ git > checkout DEV.DaVinciPSP.03.01.00.26 > Note: moving to "DEV.DaVinciPSP.03.01.00.26" which isn't a local branch > If you want to create a new branch from this checkout, you may do so > (now or later) by using -b with the checkout command again. Example: > git checkout -b > HEAD is now at 0d171c3... linux-davinci-staging: update to the latest > r26 build (phase2 for dm3xx) -- Denys ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
[PATCH] davinci: DA8xx/OMAP-L1xx: defconfigs: remove SYSFS_DEPRECATED flag
Remove SYSFS_DEPRECATED flag from DA8xx/OMAP-L13x board defconfigs More details - http://marc.info/?t=12501122857 Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko --- arch/arm/configs/da830_omapl137_defconfig |4 ++-- arch/arm/configs/da850_omapl138_defconfig |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/da830_omapl137_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/da830_omapl137_defconfig index 7c8e38f..fc6e2c4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/da830_omapl137_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/da830_omapl137_defconfig @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y # CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED is not set # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set -CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y -CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y +# CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is not set +# CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 is not set # CONFIG_RELAY is not set # CONFIG_NAMESPACES is not set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/da850_omapl138_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/da850_omapl138_defconfig index 842a70b..a1ffa4f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/da850_omapl138_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/da850_omapl138_defconfig @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y # CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED is not set # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set -CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y -CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y +# CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is not set +# CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 is not set # CONFIG_RELAY is not set # CONFIG_NAMESPACES is not set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y -- 1.6.3.3 ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Re: [PATCH 0/11 - v3] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:25:43PM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote: > Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > Another heads up - the "next" branch is now rebased with vpfe v3 patches. > > Thanks again. Now I'm using your "next" branch for my own development. FYI, I've rebased the "next" branch of linux-davinci-staging tree on arago with Kevin's latest 2.6.31-rc2 and VPFE from Hans' pull request. The "master" is set aside to track 2.6.30 for now. > >> BTW, does this tree includes musb patches which was submitted to usb > >> mailing list. but yet not included in mainline and davinci trees? As David and Kevin mentioned, those are in upstream 2.6.31-rcX now. -- Denys ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
[PATCH] davinci: Disable ARM_UNWIND to workaround building with CSL-2007q3
For more details, please see: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-o...@vger.kernel.org/msg12657.html Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko --- arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig |6 -- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig index 486b5df..b1148e1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.30-davinci1 -# Tue Jun 23 07:49:20 2009 +# Tue Jun 30 14:34:23 2009 # CONFIG_ARM=y CONFIG_SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION=y @@ -762,6 +762,7 @@ CONFIG_INPUT_MISC=y # CONFIG_INPUT_UINPUT is not set # CONFIG_INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER is not set CONFIG_INPUT_DM355EVM=m +# CONFIG_INPUT_DM365EVM is not set # # Hardware I/O ports @@ -1633,6 +1634,7 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_SG is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_NOTIFIERS is not set +CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y # CONFIG_BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY is not set # CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set # CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR is not set @@ -1664,7 +1666,7 @@ CONFIG_TRACING_SUPPORT=y # CONFIG_SAMPLES is not set CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KGDB=y # CONFIG_KGDB is not set -CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND=y +# CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND is not set CONFIG_DEBUG_USER=y CONFIG_DEBUG_ERRORS=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is not set -- 1.6.0.6 ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Re: [PATCH 0/11 - v3] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:09:12PM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote: > Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:46:31AM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote: > >> Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > >>> We have been using the arago git tree and I don't see any of the issues > >>> that you are seeing. Could you use arago tree and Let me know if you see > >>> the same issue? This tree is being tested internally by TI. So it is > >>> known > >>> to work. > >>> > >>> http://arago-project.org/git/people/sneha/linux-davinci-staging.git > >> P.S. AFAIR, arago tree is based on 2.6.30-rc2. Eventually we have to > >> test these patches with davinci tree. > > > > That's the confusion I was afraid of - the latest patches against 2.6.30 > > final were tested in the "next" branch, while "master" stayed slightly old. > > One of the reasons was to achieve feature-parity of the next branch before > > making it the new master, which happened today. > > > > But, as I explained in the previous email, that still has v2 vpfe patches, > > which I'll start rebasing tomorrow... > > Thanks for the heads up. This tree boots fine, without any issues. A > minor problem is asoc code is not building without > CONFIG_SND_DM6467_SOC_EVM=y. Another heads up - the "next" branch is now rebased with vpfe v3 patches. > BTW, does this tree includes musb patches which was submitted to usb > mailing list. but yet not included in mainline and davinci trees? Can you please be more specific which musb patches you are referring to? Thanks. -- Denys ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Re: [PATCH 0/11 - v3] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:46:31AM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote: > Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > > We have been using the arago git tree and I don't see any of the issues > > that you are seeing. Could you use arago tree and Let me know if you see > > the same issue? This tree is being tested internally by TI. So it is known > > to work. > > > > http://arago-project.org/git/people/sneha/linux-davinci-staging.git > > P.S. AFAIR, arago tree is based on 2.6.30-rc2. Eventually we have to > test these patches with davinci tree. That's the confusion I was afraid of - the latest patches against 2.6.30 final were tested in the "next" branch, while "master" stayed slightly old. One of the reasons was to achieve feature-parity of the next branch before making it the new master, which happened today. But, as I explained in the previous email, that still has v2 vpfe patches, which I'll start rebasing tomorrow... -- Denys ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Re: [PATCH 0/11 - v3] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:38:13PM -0500, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > Yusuf, > > I am not sure what is the state of vpfe branch maintained by Kevin. In one of his posts few days ago Kevin said he updated it to v3. > We have been using the arago git tree and I don't see any of the issues that > you are seeing. Could you use arago tree and Let me know if you see the same > issue? This tree is being tested internally by TI. So it is known to work. > > http://arago-project.org/git/people/sneha/linux-davinci-staging.git To avoid confusion, I moved away the previous old -rc2 based state into "old-rc2" branch and made the "next" branch the current master. But it still has the v2 vpfe patches - I'm planning to rebase the staging tree from Kevin's tomorrow and will pick the v3 patches then. -- Denys > Murali Karicheri > Software Design Engineer > Texas Instruments Inc. > Germantown, MD 20874 > Phone : 301-515-3736 > email: m-kariche...@ti.com > >-Original Message- > >From: Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ [mailto:caglarak...@gmail.com] > >Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:37 PM > >To: Kevin Hilman > >Cc: Karicheri, Muralidharan; davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com > >Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11 - v3] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE > >Capture driver > > > >Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> m-kariche...@ti.com writes: > >> > >>> From: Muralidharan Karicheri > >>> > >>> Big Thanks to all reviewers who have contributed to this driver > >>> by reviewing and offering valuable comments. > >>> > >>> VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446 > >>> > >>> This is the version v3 of the patch series. This is the reworked > >>> version of the driver based on comments received against the last > >>> version (v2) of the patch and is expected to be final version > >>> candidate for merge to upstream kernel > >> > >> FYI... > >> > >> I've updated the staging/vpfe branch of davinci git with this series > >> and the tvp514x v3 patch. > >> > >> Also, I'll be pushing the arch/arm/* patches of this series to DaVinci > >> git master and queueing them for upstream merge. > >> > > > >Has anyone using this staging tree? I'm having hard time to making > >this work. My problems are: > > > >1) This branch does not built without attached patch. > > > >2) tvp514x throws attached kernel oops. I guess this due missing > > platform data master definition in board support file. > > > >3) Even if I correct these two and compile drivers built-in then I > > see an oops message related to asoc code on boot. > > > >4) If I make these drivers kernel modules, then I can install all of > > them but dm6446_ccdc. Don't know why, just no messages on dmesg. > > > >I tried v1 and v2 of these patches previously, they were have the > >same problem of (3) but not the others. I was able to make v1 and v2 > >working but this one is a dead end due to (4). > > > >Thanks, > >Caglar > >___ > >_ > > > >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c > >b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c > >index 13b73a7..c1b8747 100644 > >--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c > >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c > >@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > >+#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > >diff --git a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpfe_capture.c > >b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpfe_capture.c > >index 003450b..4ffb164 100644 > >--- a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpfe_capture.c > >+++ b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpfe_capture.c > >@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > >-#include > >+#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > >___ > >_ > > > >Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > > > >pgd = c5dd8000 > >[] *pgd=85dce031, *pte=, *ppte= > >Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] PREEMPT > >Modules linked in: tvp514x(+) videobuf_dma_contig videobuf_core ipv6 > >CPU: 0Not tainted (2.6.30-davinci1 #105) > >PC is at strcpy+0x4/0x18 > >LR is at tvp514x_probe+0xf0/0x18c [tvp514x] > >pc : []lr : []psr: 4013 > >sp : c6309e50 ip : c048579c fp : 0008b480 > >r10: r9 : c6308000 r8 : c049e6c4 > >r7 : bf051724 r6 : bf0500e8 r5 : c5c15e00 r4 : c5de1c00 > >r3 : 000c r2 : c5de1c3c r1 : r0 : c5de1c3c > >Flags: nZcv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user > >Control: 0005317f Table: 85dd8000 DAC: 0015 > >Process insmod (pid: 993, stack limit = 0xc6308268) > >Stack: (0xc6309e50 to 0xc630a000) > >9e40: c5c15e20 bf04fbf8 > >c5c15e00 > >9e60: c5c15e20 c0291fcc c5c15e20 c5c15e54 bf051724 c022e7c0 c5c56b70 > >c5c15e20 > >9e80: c5c15e54 bf051724 bf051724 c022e8d8 c6309ea0 c022e878 > >c022dca4 > >9ea0: c5c2efb8 c5c56b70 c5c2ef88 bf0516f8 bf0
Re: [PATCH] MMC/SD Support for DM365 EVM
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:16:55PM -0500, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > I had to do this in davinci_mmc.c > > > open_drain_freq = ((unsigned int)cpu_arm_clk / (2 * MMCSD_INIT_CLOCK)) - 1; > > if (open_drain_freq > 0xFF) > open_drain_freq = 0xFF; > > Add the above 2 lines of code after line number 765. Sandeep, So, will you be submitting this as a proper patch, or should we wait for the same from Vipin? -- Denys ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: DaVinci: ASoC: Add mcasp support for DM646x
Chaithrika,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:28:40AM -0400, Chaithrika U S wrote:
> Adds driver support for the two instances of McASP on TI's DM646x.
In patch #3 you removed struct evm_snd_platform_data:
> -struct evm_snd_platform_data {
> - int tx_dma_ch;
> - int rx_dma_ch;
> -};
That structure is still used in sound/soc/davinci/davinci-evm.c, until you fix
it by patch #4:
> -static struct evm_snd_platform_data dm335evm_snd_data = {
> - .tx_dma_ch = DAVINCI_DMA_ASP1_TX,
> - .rx_dma_ch = DAVINCI_DMA_ASP1_RX,
That would break git-bisect...
--
Denys
___
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Re: dm6446 vs omap3530
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:49:19PM +0800, zhenfeng ren wrote: > hi,everyone: > > I see that dm6446 contains a 300Mhz ARM and a C64x+ DSP, while > omap3530 contains a 600Mhz ARM and a C64x+ DSP. > Dm6446's DSP is a little stronger than omap 3530. > DM6446 is much expensive than omap 3530, is it right? But I think > omap3530 is better than dm6446. > Could someone give me a explanation why dm6446 is better? Actually, DM6446 SoC is cheaper than OMAP3530, see for yourself: http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tms320dm6446.html http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/omap3530.html -- Denys ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
