Re: [db-wg] Time for new Announcements?

2021-03-13 Thread Randy Bush via db-wg
marcel,

i think nick and cynthia answered your question.  but there remains the
question of where the heck one goes for day to day routing ops help.  as
cynthia pointed out, this wg is more for the policy and technical
underpinnings, not actuall operations.  what's strange is that it is not
at all obvious where a relative newcomer goes for such discussion.

in typical imperialist fashion, the North American Network Operators'
Group mailing list [0] has become the default global ops list.  i
recommend it.

there used to be the European Operators' Forum, but RIPE swollowed it
about 2004 and now you can sign up for a glossy webinar from the NCC
which will not actually answer your question if it even allowed you to
ask it .

and, because the nanog list has about 10,000 subscribers, the behavior
is not always encouraging.  you can safely just ignore snarky people
such as i.

[0] - https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

randy

---
ra...@psg.com
`gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd ra...@psg.com`
signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery



Re: [db-wg] Time for new Announcements?

2021-03-13 Thread Cynthia Revström via db-wg
Hi Marcel,

I just want to start out by saying that the working groups are not a
support channel and this more routing than anything db related.

But with regards to your case, according to ripestat the prefixes are
announced by 2 ASNs but overall have 100% visibility (99% for the v6).

I am guessing any issues are most likely due to the other announcement.

-Cynthia

On Sat, Mar 13, 2021, 09:07 Marcel Zimmer via db-wg  wrote:

> Good morning dear community,
>
>
>
> it is an honor to be part of it :)
>
>
>
> We have applied for and been assigned our own AS at the beginning of the
> year (AS212033). Since yesterday the link to the first peering partner
> Lumen (AS3356) is available and the following networks should be announced:
>
>
>
> IPv4 193.3.45.0/24
>
> IPv6 2a10:5dc0::/32
>
>
>
> the corresponding routing objects sid created - so far so good :)
>
>
>
> Now yesterday I could observe the following:
>
>
>
> The first routers processed quite fast the Ipv4 routes and yesterday
> evening we had the following picture while looking glass of the Ipv4 and
> ipv6 network.
>
>
>
> https://www.bilder-upload.eu/bild-4a9957-1615622772.png.html
>
> https://www.bilder-upload.eu/bild-296f5c-1615622785.png.html
>
>
>
> Since then, somehow nothing happens.
>
>
>
> Do you have a tip for me where I should go troubleshooting?
>
>
>
> Greetings
>
>
>
> Marcel Zimmer
>


Re: [db-wg] Time for new Announcements?

2021-03-13 Thread Nick Hilliard via db-wg

Marcel Zimmer via db-wg wrote on 13/03/2021 08:07:

Do you have a tip for me where I should go troubleshooting?


the prefixes are being originated by both as8422 and as212033.  If you 
ask as8422 to stop announcing it, it should swing over to 212033.


Nick




[db-wg] Time for new Announcements?

2021-03-13 Thread Marcel Zimmer via db-wg
Good morning dear community,

it is an honor to be part of it :)

We have applied for and been assigned our own AS at the beginning of the year 
(AS212033). Since yesterday the link to the first peering partner Lumen 
(AS3356) is available and the following networks should be announced:

IPv4 193.3.45.0/24
IPv6 2a10:5dc0::/32

the corresponding routing objects sid created - so far so good :)

Now yesterday I could observe the following:

The first routers processed quite fast the Ipv4 routes and yesterday evening we 
had the following picture while looking glass of the Ipv4 and ipv6 network.

https://www.bilder-upload.eu/bild-4a9957-1615622772.png.html
https://www.bilder-upload.eu/bild-296f5c-1615622785.png.html

Since then, somehow nothing happens.

Do you have a tip for me where I should go troubleshooting?

Greetings

Marcel Zimmer


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature