Re: RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20376 (FastTrak376) (rev 02)
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Greetings Goswin- I have the Promise disabled in the BIOS. I was going to use my two 250G PATA in a raid only changed my mind. Have you checked out the source? http://linux.yyz.us/sata/ Doesn't list that model. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20376(FastTrak376) (rev 02)
Goswin wrote: I got 2 new SATA drives and pluged them into the onboard Promise PDC20376 (FastTrak 376) and run badblocks on them (both in parallel). The write test completed fine but readcompare locked up my system. I repeated with a read-only test and again it locked up with an DMA timeout. Does anyone have the onboard Promise successfully in use on an Asus K8V board? +++ Goswin- Mine is the PDC20378 aka TX2 with 2SATA+PATA controlled by the sata_promise kernel module. The PDC20376 is probably very similar, maybe 133 vs 150 or something trivial. That should be listed as TX4/TX2 in the kernel config under low level scsi drivers. The TX4 is a 4SATA chip and uses the same driver as the TX2. The TX2 and TX4 were add-in cards using the PDC2037x chips. I built a kernel with the promise enabled and there were no problems. Maybe the K8 Motherboard List should list sata_promise not PDC2037x to be consistent. The Promise SATA is production code and aught to be working. PATA maybe not depending on the kernel, never did try. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- AMD Athlon64 @2.4Ghz Corsair TwinX1024-3200XL @480Mhz DDR ASUS A8V Deluxe Pro ASUS Radeon A9250Ge/Td/256 Creative SB Live WD Raptor SATA Maxtor PATA IBM/Okidata Color PostScript3 Lexmark Mono PostScript2 Debian GNU/Linux debian-amd64/pure64 sid Kernel 2.6.10 XFree86 4.3.0 Xorg X11R6.8.2 1.5 Mb DSL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unstable fglrx 8.10.19?
I've followed the guide on the link that you gave me. However, when I try to modprobe fglrx i get the following error in dmesg: fglrx: no version magic, tainting kernel. fglrx: Unknown symbol put_page fglrx: Unknown symbol put_page fglrx: Unknown symbol put_page fglrx: Unknown symbol put_page fglrx: Unknown symbol put_page I don't recalling having anything like when installing drivers using rpm. Do you know how to fix this? Many thanks, Andrei On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 18:56 -0500, Peter Nelson wrote: Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: Hello everyone! After upgrading the fglrx drivers from 8.8.25 to the latest 8.10.19, i've noticed that my system became very very unstable. I am experiencing crashes about twice a day, sometime system frizzes without being able to reboot using Alt-SysRr. Try using the drivers I built using flavio's packages here: http://rufus.hackish.org/~rufus/files/fglrx/ If that doesn't fix it, I'd suggest reporting of rage3d.net's forums, as some ATI developers hang out there. -Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unstable fglrx 8.10.19?
A small correction to the previous message: I get the errors during modprobe only if I compile fglrx module using make-kpkg. If I go to /usr/src/modules/fglrx.. and run make.sh, then manually copy the fglrx.ko and run depmod -ae, the module loads without any errors. Andrei On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 11:04 +, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: I've followed the guide on the link that you gave me. However, when I try to modprobe fglrx i get the following error in dmesg: fglrx: no version magic, tainting kernel. fglrx: Unknown symbol put_page fglrx: Unknown symbol put_page fglrx: Unknown symbol put_page fglrx: Unknown symbol put_page fglrx: Unknown symbol put_page I don't recalling having anything like when installing drivers using rpm. Do you know how to fix this? Many thanks, Andrei On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 18:56 -0500, Peter Nelson wrote: Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: Hello everyone! After upgrading the fglrx drivers from 8.8.25 to the latest 8.10.19, i've noticed that my system became very very unstable. I am experiencing crashes about twice a day, sometime system frizzes without being able to reboot using Alt-SysRr. Try using the drivers I built using flavio's packages here: http://rufus.hackish.org/~rufus/files/fglrx/ If that doesn't fix it, I'd suggest reporting of rage3d.net's forums, as some ATI developers hang out there. -Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20376(FastTrak376) (rev 02)
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin wrote: I got 2 new SATA drives and pluged them into the onboard Promise PDC20376 (FastTrak 376) and run badblocks on them (both in parallel). The write test completed fine but readcompare locked up my system. I repeated with a read-only test and again it locked up with an DMA timeout. Does anyone have the onboard Promise successfully in use on an Asus K8V board? +++ Goswin- Mine is the PDC20378 aka TX2 with 2SATA+PATA controlled by the sata_promise kernel module. The PDC20376 is probably very similar, maybe 133 vs 150 or something trivial. It is supported by the source as such, it has the PCI id in its list. The problem is it doesn't seem to work right. I have a TX4 too which works perfectly. It seems noone else is using the onboard 20376 so it might not be surprising that bugs haven't been found. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dchroot script (was Re: running openoffice from chroot)
Alexandru Cabuz wrote: The suggestion with the openoffice \%u\ worked. But if you say there is a cleaner solution... Yes, but a better thing is to fix dchroot's / su's stupidity with a script (make this do_chroot): I don't understand. What should I do with this script? From the FAQ: You can make things slightly simpler even than this. Write a small shell script like the following, and place it in your PATH: eg. /usr/local/bin/do_dchroot [Use the new script from the mailing list] Make it executable: chmod 755 /usr/local/bin/do_dchroot Now create a symlink to this script from each command you want to run inside the chroot to this shell script: cd /usr/local/bin ln -s do_dchroot openoffice ln -s do_dchroot oowriter ln -s do_dchroot oocalc Now you can execute openoffice by simply typing openoffice or oowriter. -Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[off topic] compile error on using F_SETSIG
I am using debian-amd64 port on my athlon box.
I am trying to use F_SETSIG in one of my project. Whenever I compile it
I get an error `F_SETSIG' undeclared error. Anyone seen this error, or
no how to fix it.
foo.c:
#include fcntl.h
#include netinet/in.h
#include signal.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include string.h
#include sys/socket.h
#include sys/types.h
#include unistd.h
#ifndef SERVER_PORT
#define SERVER_PORT 8003
#endif
int main ()
{
int socket_fd;
struct sockaddr_in serv_sock_addr;
socket_fd = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
bzero ((char *) serv_sock_addr, sizeof (serv_sock_addr));
serv_sock_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
serv_sock_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl (INADDR_ANY);
serv_sock_addr.sin_port = htons ((short) SERVER_PORT);
bind (socket_fd, (struct sockaddr *) serv_sock_addr,
sizeof (serv_sock_addr));
listen (socket_fd, 5);
fcntl (socket_fd, F_SETOWN, getpid ());
fcntl (socket_fd, F_SETSIG, SIGRTMIN);
fcntl (socket_fd, F_SETFL, O_ASYNC | O_NONBLOCK);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
([EMAIL PROTECTED])(~/Work/temp)
$ gcc -g -Wall -c foo.c
foo.c: In function `main':
foo.c:31: error: `F_SETSIG' undeclared (first use in this function)
foo.c:31: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
foo.c:31: error: for each function it appears in.)
Thanks,
Bharath
---
Bharath Ramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://csgrad.cs.vt.edu/~bramesh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [off topic] compile error on using F_SETSIG
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:02:26PM -0500, Bharath Ramesh wrote: I am using debian-amd64 port on my athlon box. I am trying to use F_SETSIG in one of my project. Whenever I compile it I get an error `F_SETSIG' undeclared error. Anyone seen this error, or no how to fix it. You will need to define _GNU_SOURCE for that (before any includes). Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-amd64 Mirror
Hello, I have setup a mirror of the debian-amd64 directory from alioth. It is available via both FTP and HTTP at http://mirror.ohiolinux.net/pub/mirrors/debian-amd64/ (replace http with ftp, as appropriate :-) If there is anything missing, please let me know. I have it updating every 6hrs at this point, but I can change this if necessary. David -- David J. Coulson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.davidcoulson.net/ phone: (216) 920-3100 / (216) 258-4942 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20376(FastTrak376) (rev 02)
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is supported by the source as such, it has the PCI id in its list. The problem is it doesn't seem to work right. I have a TX4 too which works perfectly. It seems noone else is using the onboard 20376 so it might not be surprising that bugs haven't been found. I have an ASUS K8V with a Promise PDC20376. It is running under kernel 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 without problems so far. I probably have never put a very high load on it. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dual opteron m/b: S2875ANRF vs. GA-7A8DW
Hello! I'm hesitating over a choice of a dual opteron motherboard. Currently I consider two options: Tyan S2875ANRF http://tyan.com/products/html/tigerk8w_spec.html and Gigabyte GA-7A8DW http://tw.giga-byte.com/Server/Products/Products_ServerBoard_GA-7A8DW.htm They are quite similar (including a price ;) though there are some differences: 1. Form factor ATX vs. EATX (although Gigabyte claims design to fit ATX chassis screw hole, and I think it will fit my middle-tower). 2. Tyan's board has Intel 82541EI GbE LAN controller on-board while Gigabyte's possess Broadcom BCM 5705 (which one is better?). 3. Tyan has 5 PCI slots, Gigabyte - 2 PCI-X and 1 PCI (currently I don't have any PCI-X devices). 4. Tyan has integrated Firewire controller (I use firewire sometimes, currently with PCI controller). With respect to the features, I would prefer Tyan's board. But as a brand I like Gigabyte better than Tyan: previously I've had some negative experience with Tyan, and for more than a year I have been very pleased by dual-athlon Gigabyte motherboard GA-7DPXDW-P. The motherboard is going to be used for intensive 24/7 computations. Of course, under Debian pure64. Please share your experience or suggestions. Thanks, Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dual opteron m/b: S2875ANRF vs. GA-7A8DW
I have a Gigabyte GA-7A8DW. Installs (sid-amd64-netinst.iso) and runs perfectly fine on Pure64/unstable. The EATX size caught me out and I had to get a bigger case. $ uptime 17:19:49 up 26 days, 14 min, 2 users, load average: 1.42, 0.53, 0.23 (not working too hard currently, but was compiling with make -j2 :-) The two PCI-X slots can be used as standard PCI slots. The only thing to watch for is to make sure the DDR is in the right slots, or it won't boot (at all). Hope this helps. Later Lee Begg On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:54, Max wrote: Hello! I'm hesitating over a choice of a dual opteron motherboard. Currently I consider two options: Tyan S2875ANRF http://tyan.com/products/html/tigerk8w_spec.html and Gigabyte GA-7A8DW http://tw.giga-byte.com/Server/Products/Products_ServerBoard_GA-7A8DW.htm They are quite similar (including a price ;) though there are some differences: 1. Form factor ATX vs. EATX (although Gigabyte claims design to fit ATX chassis screw hole, and I think it will fit my middle-tower). 2. Tyan's board has Intel 82541EI GbE LAN controller on-board while Gigabyte's possess Broadcom BCM 5705 (which one is better?). 3. Tyan has 5 PCI slots, Gigabyte - 2 PCI-X and 1 PCI (currently I don't have any PCI-X devices). 4. Tyan has integrated Firewire controller (I use firewire sometimes, currently with PCI controller). With respect to the features, I would prefer Tyan's board. But as a brand I like Gigabyte better than Tyan: previously I've had some negative experience with Tyan, and for more than a year I have been very pleased by dual-athlon Gigabyte motherboard GA-7DPXDW-P. The motherboard is going to be used for intensive 24/7 computations. Of course, under Debian pure64. Please share your experience or suggestions. Thanks, Max pgpQZHlCR1Qmy.pgp Description: PGP signature
