Re: binutils broken?
On 05-Mar-18 06:22, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Andreas Jochens wrote: > > > >Please try 'apt-get install --reinstall binutils' and check if it > >works again. > > > > apt-get install did not work, cause the Package database > is corrupted now. (Shouldn't you increase the version number > if there is a new package?) > > But I could wget the new binutils*.deb. The core dump for > as seems to be gone. Something really weird is going on with the gcc-3.4 archive on alioth. It looks like some packages are missing and the package database seems to be corrupt. It seems that the gcc-3.4 archive was at least partially destroyed when alioth's disks were full again a few days ago. On my own server I have a private copy of the archive which still works fine. I will reupload all packages from that private archive to alioth again. However, this will take three or four days with my DSL connection. This procedure will also cause every package which was still compiled with gcc-3.4 to be replaced with a gcc-4.0 compiled version because my private archive has been completely converted to gcc-4.0. This will also be a good opportunity to finally change the name of the archive to gcc4. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How do I bind mount removable media to my 32 bit chroot
Thanks - rbind mount does the trick! On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 04:12, Javier Kohen wrote: > El mié, 16-03-2005 a las 10:16 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > > Once you've done this, you should be able to mount/unmount from within > > the chroot fine. I used to have it set up as a bind, and it didnt work, > > but this worked for me. > > Maybe what you guys want is a rbind mount. I haven't tried it, but > that's what the mount manpage says to use when you want deeper mounts to > be bound as well during a bind mount. See the manpage for better > wording :) -- Robert King, Statistics, School of Mathematical & Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia Room V133 ph +61 2 4921 5548 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://maths.newcastle.edu.au/~rking/ "You are the stupidest thing I have ever seen. That in includes garden vegetables, power tools and dirt." --- Nurse Practitioner Money Raspberry Dupre, Gideon's Crossing pgpow8mpIzGTn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Problem with htDig
On Thursday 17 March 2005 10:57 pm, Per Bojsen wrote: > *** Regarding Problem with htDig; BARBIER Jean-Matthieu > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds: > > BARBIER> I can create the databases for htDig and it seems to > BARBIER> work. The db files=20 seems correct. But the commands htdump > BARBIER> and htsearch give empty results. > > I think I have the same problem. I see the db files being generated > but searches from the web page do not produce any results. I am using > the gcc4 archive. And I was thinking that I did something wrong ! :( [EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ Egon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sata and Ati Xpress 200
Gmail wrote: Well I have to say I find myself in the same hole. Tried many distros Mandrake, Fedora, Debian, Knoppix, Ubuntu, suse. They boot but can't find my hardrive, I think is the Ati xpress chipset. Any clue in where to get a driver that works or any other solution? It's the ATI SB400 chipset. Will work with the SATA_SIL (Silicon Image) driver starting with 2.6.11 - no distro seem to be _that_ current to have the recently released stable kernel, so bad luck for a plain install. You can still install with an IDE-ATA drive, compile a new 2.6.11 that recognizes the SATA, copy over and install a bootloader. Worked for me. Till now only two of my four SATA connectors work for me, the 2nd pair has a different PCI ID than the 1st one - different controller? ;) It works for now, but it isn't "pretty"... With kind regards, Oliver Korpilla -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binutils broken?
Andreas Jochens wrote: Please try 'apt-get install --reinstall binutils' and check if it works again. apt-get install did not work, cause the Package database is corrupted now. (Shouldn't you increase the version number if there is a new package?) But I could wget the new binutils*.deb. The core dump for as seems to be gone. Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: binutils broken?
Hi, El jue, 17-03-2005 a las 20:28 -0800, Dustin Nicholas Jenkins escribiÃ: > I keep getting a Segmentation Fault as well, something big happened > during the update last night. For me though, it's dpkg that's faulting > each time regardless. I don't know how to get around it if dpkg is > failing, none of my packages can be updated/installed without it. It requires some work on your part, but if you can't wait for a fix, here are some things you can do: 1) You can either compile a fresh copy without optimizations or with a different compiler. 2) You can use a dpkg from a rescue disk. 3) You can unpack a previous --working-- version manually (sorry, I don't know how to do that offhand but it shouldn't be so difficult). 4) You can have someone else compile it for you. If it's statically linked you'll have more chances that it'll work and, even more, if your kernel has IA32 emulation enabled, you can use a 32-bit dpkg as well. I think that's a good number of alternatives. Good luck, -- Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
Re: binutils broken?
I keep getting a Segmentation Fault as well, something big happened during the update last night. For me though, it's dpkg that's faulting each time regardless. I don't know how to get around it if dpkg is failing, none of my packages can be updated/installed without it. This line appears in dmesg each time dpkg is invoked: dpkg[7253] general protection rip:2a956e39ba rsp:7fb6c0 error:0 And this line is spit out to the command line: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault. Anyone else? /** * Dustin */ Andreas Jochens wrote: On 05-Mar-17 22:13, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks, If I try to build the kernel then I get % make V=1 prepare make -f /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.3/Makefile silentoldconfig make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic gcc-3.4 -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer-o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c gcc-3.4: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as) Please submit a full bug report. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see . make[2]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 1 make[1]: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 make: *** [include/linux/autoconf.h] Error 2 2 days ago there was no such problem. Please try 'apt-get install --reinstall binutils' and check if it works again. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fglrx64 for ati 9700 pro
Use my debs instead of trying to alien them: http://rufus.hackish.org/~rufus/files/fglrx/ -Peter Christophe Dupré wrote: Hi guys, I've been trying to install fglrx64 in order to make use of the 3D acceleration of my ATI 9700 pro. I downloaded fglrx64_4_3_0-8.10.19-1.x86_64.rpm, aliened it, and then got fglrx64-4-3-0_8.10.19-2_amd64.deb. I install it, recompiled my kernel (2.6.11), patched fglrx, and compile the module. My problem is when I run XFree86. I don't understand why some libs and modules are placed in /usr/X11R6/lib64 while all others are placed in /usr/X11/lib/ dpkg -L fglrx64-4-30 /usr/X11R6/lib64 /usr/X11R6/lib64/libGL.so.1.2 /usr/X11R6/lib64/libfglrx_gamma.a /usr/X11R6/lib64/libfglrx_gamma.so.1.0 /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/dri /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/drivers /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.o /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/linux /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/linux/libfglrxdrm.a When I start X, it complains that the driver fglrx is not found. Can you please help. Thanks a lot, Christophe Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sata and Ati Xpress 200
Well I have to say I find myself in the same hole. Tried many distros Mandrake, Fedora, Debian, Knoppix, Ubuntu, suse. They boot but can't find my hardrive, I think is the Ati xpress chipset. Any clue in where to get a driver that works or any other solution?
fglrx64 for ati 9700 pro
Hi guys, I've been trying to install fglrx64 in order to make use of the 3D acceleration of my ATI 9700 pro. I downloaded fglrx64_4_3_0-8.10.19-1.x86_64.rpm, aliened it, and then got fglrx64-4-3-0_8.10.19-2_amd64.deb. I install it, recompiled my kernel (2.6.11), patched fglrx, and compile the module. My problem is when I run XFree86. I don't understand why some libs and modules are placed in /usr/X11R6/lib64 while all others are placed in /usr/X11/lib/ dpkg -L fglrx64-4-30 /usr/X11R6/lib64 /usr/X11R6/lib64/libGL.so.1.2 /usr/X11R6/lib64/libfglrx_gamma.a /usr/X11R6/lib64/libfglrx_gamma.so.1.0 /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/dri /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/drivers /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.o /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/linux /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/linux/libfglrxdrm.a When I start X, it complains that the driver fglrx is not found. Can you please help. Thanks a lot, Christophe Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binutils broken?
On 05-Mar-17 22:13, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > If I try to build the kernel then I get > > % make V=1 prepare > make -f /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.3/Makefile silentoldconfig > make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic > gcc-3.4 -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer-o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c > gcc-3.4: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as) > Please submit a full bug report. > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. > For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see > . > > make[2]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 > make: *** [include/linux/autoconf.h] Error 2 > > > 2 days ago there was no such problem. Please try 'apt-get install --reinstall binutils' and check if it works again. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CVS Segfault
I was able to reproduce a segfault using CVS from gcc-4.0. As I reported
some time ago, after a recent recompile it was working fine, but I guess
it's not completely fixed. Maybe a rebuild will help?
Otherwise I'll try to hunt down the bug. In case it matters (or somebody
can recognize the problem), strace shows:
lstat("somefile", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=276, ...}) = 0
stat("somefile", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=276, ...}) = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
--
Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
Re: binutils broken?
Bausi, you're right! That is a really bad name for the program ``as``. I thought I was looking at an incomplete message... jbar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binutils broken?
On Thursday, 17. March 2005 22:51, Jiri Barton wrote: > g++ -c hallowelt.cpp > > g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as) > Please submit a full bug report. > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. > For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see > . > > I have found out, it has to refer something from libstdc++, the plain C++ > is not enough. Can it be something with the stdc++ lib? > No, I think it's "as" that is broken. You can see it segfault in "dmesg". Using the binutils from pure64 everything compiles without ICEs for me. Greetings Bausi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with htDig
*** Regarding Problem with htDig; BARBIER Jean-Matthieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds: BARBIER> I can create the databases for htDig and it seems to BARBIER> work. The db files=20 seems correct. But the commands htdump BARBIER> and htsearch give empty results. I think I have the same problem. I see the db files being generated but searches from the web page do not produce any results. I am using the gcc4 archive. Per -- Per Bojsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7 Francis Road Billerica, MA 01821-3618 USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binutils broken?
Hey there,
I confirm. It does not have to be anything beyond the following program to
crash the compiler:
#include
using namespace std;
int
main ()
{
string astring="Hallo Welt.";
return 0;
}
g++ -c hallowelt.cpp
g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as)
Please submit a full bug report.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see
.
I have found out, it has to refer something from libstdc++, the plain C++ is
not enough. Can it be something with the stdc++ lib?
jbar
ii libstdc++5 3.3.5-10.0.0.1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libstdc++5-3.3 3.3.5-10.0.0.1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (development
un libstdc++5-3.3 (no description available)
un libstdc++5-dev (no description available)
ii libstdc++6 4.0-0pre7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libstdc++6-4.0 4.0-0pre7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (development
un libstdc++6-4.0 (no description available)
pn libstdc++6-dev (no description available)
un libstdc++6-doc (no description available)
And just gcc-4.0, no 3.4 versions installed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
binutils broken?
Hi folks, If I try to build the kernel then I get % make V=1 prepare make -f /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.3/Makefile silentoldconfig make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic gcc-3.4 -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer-o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c gcc-3.4: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as) Please submit a full bug report. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see . make[2]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 1 make[1]: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 make: *** [include/linux/autoconf.h] Error 2 2 days ago there was no such problem. Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Problems in d-i derived CD images
Hi to all, As some of you may already have known, some languages need extra packages which get retrieved during the languagechooser stage. For example: Turkish needs 'console-terminus', RTL languages (Arabic, etc.) need 'jfbterm', 'unifont' and 'libfribidi0', and Cyrillic languages need 'console-cyrillic'. However I've noticed that some d-i derived CD images do not include those packages (at least, this is the case for Turkish), hence CD-based installations (without a network connection) are badly affected for those languages. Concerning the console-terminus package of Turkish, I saw this problem in Ubuntu CDs (fixed in newer versions, thanks to Colin Watson) and in amd64 CD images (hence CCed to debian-amd64 m-l). I couldn't check SkoleLinux, but I think it may have the some problem. What I would like to know is that, could we find a better method to make sure that those packages are always included in CD images without the need of contacting the relevant persons? Regards, -- roktas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Problem with htDig
Hello I use the pure64 distribution with htDig 3.1.6-11 I can create the databases for htDig and it seems to work. The db files seems correct. But the commands htdump and htsearch give empty results. Somebody on the list had the same problem a few monthes ago, but i've not seen any answer to his post.. so has anyone experience with htdig on amd64 ? bug ??? Best regards Jm Barbier The first post on the subject, 2004-11-24 03:30:13 >Hello, > >I use the pure64 distribution with htDig 3.1.6-10.1. > >I can create the database for htDig and it seems to work, because htmerge >outputs a lot of correct informations. But the commands htdumd and >htsearch give no output. I think I have indexed more than 2 pages. > >Has anyone expirience with htDiG? > >Best Regards > Stefan Luethje signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Zero latency kernel 2.6.10 (64 bit)
Hi everyone, Does anyone know where I can find a binary zero-latency kernel 2.6.10 (for amd64 obviously..)? I tried Daniel James' script, but didnt manage to build with much success. I've not got a vast knowledge of building kernels and whatnot... I've switched to Linux as I find Linux easier to use, but there's a lot of stuttering going on with more than 3 or so tracks in Ardour. I know it ain't the soundcard as I've got a perfectly good working Delta 10/10, and its currently getting dusty! :( Thanks in advance, James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SATA/IDE strangeness (ATI chip)
Hello! On my MSI motherboard there are the following devices: :00:11.0 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 437a :00:12.0 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4379 :00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4376 These are listed in the PCI ID database (not committed yet): 4376Standard Dual Channel PCI IDE Controller ATI 4379ATI 4379 Serial ATA Controller 437aATI 437A Serial ATA Controller The 1st SATA controller seems to work with the SATA_SIL driver from vanilla 2.6.11 (and none sooner, I tried), and I'm using it that way now. Since the Debian Pure64 CD doesn't come with that, it doesn't find a HD when trying to install with the CD. I have the following problems: -- * Though the SATA is configured in IDE mode in BIOS it does not show up as IDE within Linux and this does not change when the ATIIXP driver is loaded - ide2 is not recognized as a bus with connected devices. My SATA HD is listed by the BIOS to be channel 2 master, while CD-ROM on the Dual ATA is listed on channel 0, channel 1 is unused, so shouldn't the SATA drive show up as /dev/hde or something??? * How can I tune the ATIIXP driver via parameters or source modification so it recognizes the SATA controllers as devices to configure??? * How can I force ANY IDE driver to recognize these SATA drives in IDE mode? This is a mail regarding this topic I'm confused about. The author seems to think, ATIIXP can do the 4379 as well: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0412.1/1460.html Please let me know if I can provide you with any additional data. Thanks and with kind regards, Oliver Korpilla -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SATA/IDE strangeness (ATI chip)
Hello! On my MSI motherboard there are the following devices: :00:11.0 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 437a :00:12.0 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4379 :00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4376 These are listed in the PCI ID database (not committed yet): 4376Standard Dual Channel PCI IDE Controller ATI 4379ATI 4379 Serial ATA Controller 437aATI 437A Serial ATA Controller The 1st SATA controller seems to work with the SATA_SIL driver from vanilla 2.6.11 (and none sooner, I tried), and I'm using it that way now. Since the Debian Pure64 CD doesn't come with that, it doesn't find a HD when trying to install with the CD. I have the following problems: -- * Though the SATA is configured in IDE mode in BIOS it does not show up as IDE within Linux and this does not change when the ATIIXP driver is loaded - ide2 is not recognized as a bus with connected devices. My SATA HD is listed by the BIOS to be channel 2 master, while CD-ROM on the Dual ATA is listed on channel 0, channel 1 is unused, so shouldn't the SATA drive show up as /dev/hde or something??? * How can I tune the ATIIXP driver via parameters or source modification so it recognizes the SATA controllers as devices to configure??? * How can I force ANY IDE driver to recognize these SATA drives in IDE mode? This is a mail regarding this topic I'm confused about. The author seems to think, ATIIXP can do the 4379 as well: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0412.1/1460.html Please let me know if I can provide you with any additional data. Thanks and with kind regards, Oliver Korpilla -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Monitor Out of Range Error with xf86
so i found http://support.gateway.com/support/manlib/cmponts/Monitors/8506484/06484.htm which seems sorta craptastic, as i'm not sure if there are several different rebranded monitors in this series. try making sure in your XF86Config-4's Monitor Section you have VertRefresh 50-160 HorizSync30-60 also man XF86Config-4 and consider specifying DefaultDepth and Modes for that depth in the screen->display subsection best patrick Chris Wakefield wrote: >Hi Patrick. > >Post the output of: > ># cat /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 > >so we can see your config file. >also post your video card model and information (just for fun & just in case): > >:~$ lspci|grep VGA or just: :~$ lspci > >Also, meanwhile try using: > >dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86This method is a little more up to date I >believe. (as opposed to xf86config). > >unless you are using Xorg instead of xfree86, in which case I wouldn't know >what to suggest. > >Chris W. > > >On March 13, 2005 06:45 pm, Patrick Carlson wrote: > > >>Hello. I brought my AMD64 system home over spring break and I'm >>trying to configure it for another monitor. Whenever I try to >>configure with xf86config, and startx, it the monitor goes gray with >>wavey lines and says "out of range". I looked up the properties on my >>gateway EV900 monitor and everything seems correct. I can't seem to >>figure out what the problem is. Everything works great with my other >>monitor. If anyone has any suggestions I would greatly appreciate it. >> Thank you! >> >>-Patrick >> >> > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenOffice.org
Hello On 2005-03-17 Daniel James wrote: > I've just installed Ubuntu Hoary 5.04 preview for amd64 on a brand new > HP zv5464 laptop, and it has OpenOffice.org 1.1.3 working. I guess > it's using stuff in the /lib32 directory to do this. I don't have a /lib32. Is this the Multi-Arch thing the HOWTO talks about in the section about future plans or do they thave yet another approach? (sounds at least better than my chroot with bind-mounts) bye, -christian- pgpURqel9LuHn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: OpenOffice.org
On Thursday 17 March 2005 14:15, Zachary Rizer wrote: > As far as I know, openoffice.org will not compile on > amd64. I've just installed Ubuntu Hoary 5.04 preview for amd64 on a brand new HP zv5464 laptop, and it has OpenOffice.org 1.1.3 working. I guess it's using stuff in the /lib32 directory to do this. Flawless install, by the way - the only issue was that the pre-installed ntfs partition was corrupted (yes, on a brand new machine), so ntfsresize failed. I fixed this by booting Windows XP, running chkdsk /f at the command prompt, rebooting Windows so that chkdsk could run, then rebooting with the Ubuntu disc in the drive. Cheers Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: complete new install
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:10:01AM +0100, Uwe wrote: > 1) data-transfer from disk to disk seems to be very slo and cpu conduming. > copying huge files from USB-disk to IDE-disk ist very very slow with a load > of nearly 90%. It seems to be independent from the filesystemtype - it's the > same for FAT32 and NTFS sources. Is DMA enabled for the disks? If ide-generic is running the controler instead of a native driver you don't get DMA which means all IO is slow and uses a lot of cpu. Check /proc/ide/ or if sata it should be enabled (unless you run sata in old ide compatible mode). Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: complete new install
On Thursday 17 March 2005 09:17, Alexander wrote: > Am Freitag, den 18.03.2005, 08:10 +0100 schrieb Uwe: > > 2) I have trouble getting that cool'n'quiet thing running. As the > > powernow-daemon relies on the /sys-filesystem i suggest defaulting it in > > the kernel-images. I installed the sysfsutils package but can't get > > the /sys-filesystem working. Especially the cpu-freq part is not > > available. the sysfsutils-daemon fires up, but powernow doesn't. > > Hi > for powernowd you have to load the module powernow_k8. > I have loaded the module cpufrq_powersave too. > And it works fine. yes, that's it. thanks. -- --- ASUS K8S-MX, 2800+ (754), 512MB, gnuLinux v2.6.x -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenOffice.org
> As far as I know OpenOffice does not compile under AMD64. You have to > setup an "i386 chroot" and start OpenOffice from within there. I confirm. I tried without success, then asked to the OOo ml and they told me OOo1.9 won't (yet) compile on Amd64. ciao maxxer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenOffice.org
Hello On 2005-03-17 A J Stiles wrote: > Has anybody managed to get OpenOffice.org -- either the Debian source > package, > or the 2.0 release candidate -- to compile successfully on AMD64? > > What did you have to do to make it work? As far as I know OpenOffice does not compile under AMD64. You have to setup an "i386 chroot" and start OpenOffice from within there. Try searching the Debian amd64 howto which has a small guide how to setup such a chroot. bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenOffice.org
--- A J Stiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anybody managed to get OpenOffice.org -- either > the Debian source package, > or the 2.0 release candidate -- to compile > successfully on AMD64? > As far as I know, openoffice.org will not compile on amd64. See the HOWTO/FAQ. Not sure about v2.0. Did you try it yourself? > What did you have to do to make it work? Maybe ask the OOo people themselves. > > AJS > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
Has anybody managed to get OpenOffice.org -- either the Debian source package, or the 2.0 release candidate -- to compile successfully on AMD64? What did you have to do to make it work? AJS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLC and Mplayer issues
> Evening all, > > Is anything being done about the installation of VLC (which currently > depends on libflac4, which is uninstallable), or has it been lost by the > way side? > > Also, how do I go about getting support for wmv files in Mplayer on > AMD64? Am I right in thinking I need a chroot and to run Mplayer as > 32bit? That would be a shame... > You'll probably have to run a 32 bit chrooted mplayer to be able to play wmv files. If yoy compile mplayer from sources under a 64 bit environment it will arge that only 32 bit plataforms can make use of win32 libs (and you need them for playing wmv files). Now that a x64 edition of windows with a 64 bit media player and 64bit dll's has been released maybe we'll be able to compile mplayer against them without the need of a chroot. Aritz Beraza [Rei] -- Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] ___ [ WWW ] http://evangelion.homelinux.net [jabber] rei[en]bulmalug.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: complete new install
Am Freitag, den 18.03.2005, 08:10 +0100 schrieb Uwe: > 2) I have trouble getting that cool'n'quiet thing running. As the > powernow-daemon relies on the /sys-filesystem i suggest defaulting it in the > kernel-images. I installed the sysfsutils package but can't get > the /sys-filesystem working. Especially the cpu-freq part is not available. > the sysfsutils-daemon fires up, but powernow doesn't. Hi for powernowd you have to load the module powernow_k8. I have loaded the module cpufrq_powersave too. And it works fine. -- Alexander Jede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
