gcc4: xscreensaver
Hi, I've noticed that xscreensaver segfault after I changed repository to debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org, updated and upgraded. Here is the backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x002a95d44710 in XFindOnExtensionList () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x002a95d44710 in XFindOnExtensionList () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #1 0x002a95d3cf20 in XFlush () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #2 0x002a95d3dcbd in XLoadQueryFont () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #3 0x004157f2 in clear_stderr () #4 0x002a95be6203 in _XtRemoveAllInputs () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 #5 0x002a95be64a6 in XtAppNextEvent () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 #6 0x0040ff04 in sleep_until_idle () #7 0x0040871f in check_for_leaks () #8 0x0040a7bd in main () Is anyone working on this? Regards, Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: non-free package archive
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 11:14 -0500, Adam M wrote: On 5/12/05, Kaare Hviid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 01:13 -0500, Adam M wrote: Hi, I have compiled a list of packages in non-free that can be included in Amd64's non-free. A few days ago I have posted the entire list of good and bad packages on debian-devel[1]. They can also be found at, http://people.debian.org/~adamm/non-free/ bad.txt - not distributable good.txt - distributable I think non-free is important to be part of Amd64 port for Sarge due to a few important packages like, like RFCs and the nvidia drivers. Now that I have reviewed these licenses, will Amd64 port carry non-free in Sarge? - Adam I just finished my own review of the non-free packages. Please don't misunderstand me - I'm not trying to tell you what to do, I just thought I'd give it a shot and have a look at the non-free licenses. Also, I'm by no means a lawyer, nor am I a DD - I'm just a layman. I've used the Packages list of a current i386 *sarge* box, and had invaluable help from http://nonfree.alioth.debian.org/. My criteria I didn't use nonfree.alioth.debian.org and I didn't use Packages. I used current Sources and read the dreaded debian/*copyright files from each of the source packages. It might have been better if you raised some questions about why I put something in good.txt and other stuff in bad.txt and then point to relevant sections of the licenses I looked at [1]. Trying to match the binary-source can be tricky. I wasn't aware that you had done a proper audit of the licenses when I embarked on looking at it. Once finished, I found your mail, and rather than throwing away my own list, I replied you, thinking someone might want a second opinion. I have also read each of the dreaded debian/copyright files, (which nonfree.alioth.debian.org links to) and have tried to find further information when it was lacking. Our findings match up pretty good anyway, with the exception of libforms-doc (that I find clearly non-distributable), and moria and trn4 (where I didn't find anything compelling hindering distribution). Anyway, I just want to look at the nvidia package where you said, Notwithstanding the foregoing terms of Section 2.1.1, SOFTWARE designed exclusively for use on the Linux operating system may be copied and redistributed, provided that the binary files thereof are not modified in any way (except for unzipping of compressed files). Debian, and apparently Ubuntu, have special permission for distributing. The intent is probably only to deny OEMs to rebundle the stuff without nVidia's permission. What I think nVidia does is use the same license for distribution for Linux, Windows and Mac but they have an exception for Linux distributions that allow redistribution of their binary drivers. The binary drivers themselves are not permitted to be modified (how? with a hex editor? :). GPLed stuff of course can be modified. I found it unclear if distributing it in a .deb was allowed, as it could be seen as of a form of modification beyond unzipping of compressed files. As such, I also marked it with a ?, denoting that I couldn't tell if it was good or bad. Given nVidia's presence in the Linux desktop market, I'd be surprised if they wouldn't *promote* distribution of ready-to-go driver packages for the Debian amd64 sarge port. Didn't they even sponsor Gentoo with amd64 hardware to get going? If nothing else, I think the nVidia drivers and the RFCs must be distributed by Amd64 for Sarge if the port is going to have some penetration into the destrop market. If there is no nvidia drivers, people will try to install them with the nvidia installer and butcher their installations. They will then complain that Amd64 Sarge is crap because they cannot even get their FX card to work! I certainly agree - the number of consumer desktops with the amd64 nVidia combination is staggering to the brink of almost becoming synonymous in the consumer electronics shops. -ukh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hate dialup speeds?
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Find out more from our site 1clickauthority.info Goodbye, Cathy Smith purple strawberry brown grape Doesn't Kate's granddaughter miss shaving for a few months?. I was missing jumping.. red banana yellow mango AUDIENCE: Yes.. I don't hate studying in London..
Re: postgresql 8
Christopher Browne wrote: On 5/12/05, Koen Tavernier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm putting a dual opteron box together and I will be installing postgresql 8 on it. Has anyone here compiled this, and is there anything in particular I should look out for? We're running a bunch of quad opterons in production now, all on PG 7.4, at this point, though we have started PG8 testing... The challenges of the platform have very little to do with how PostgreSQL compiles and runs, and everything to do with getting any of the esoteric bits of the hardware configuration working. Our challenges have been in getting EMC disk array connections up and running, as the combination of: - High end disk array - Fibrechannel communications cards - High availability drivers have proven troublesome to get supported and somewhat troublesome to get working. That heads towards ambitious needs for HIGH performance disk I/O... If your hardware is a bit more pedestrian, I'd not expect many problems. Just a quick follow-up. After struggling a bit to get the Dell Perc 4e (LSI megaraid) recognised by the installer, and get grub to install onto one of the SCSI drives, postgresql 8 compiled without a hitch and runs fine. I will be doing some serious populating later and see how things hold up. Your analysis was bang on. Sort the hardware out and the rest will follow! Thanks. Koen. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using Alioth Opteron net install to config MD raid1
I'm using an Alioth net install CD to put Debian onto a new dual opteron PC using 2 SATA drives. I'm getting confused during the drive setup process. What I'm wanting to do is use the raid 1 setup with each disk having 3 partitions (as in a workstation install): root, swap, home. How do I setup md to work with these partitions? I seem to be able to use EITHER the 3-partition structure OR the RAID 1 structure (the install puts 1 ext3 partition into the RAID1 device). Can I do what I want to with this install? If I am not able to change these options, can I at least change the ext3 file system to an XFS system? (I think XFS is cool!) -- Rupert Heesom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: non-free package archive
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:12:45AM +0200, Kaare Hviid wrote: I found it unclear if distributing it in a .deb was allowed, as it could be seen as of a form of modification beyond unzipping of compressed files. As such, I also marked it with a ?, denoting that I couldn't tell if it was good or bad. Given nVidia's presence in the Linux desktop market, I'd be surprised if they wouldn't *promote* distribution of ready-to-go driver packages for the Debian amd64 sarge port. Didn't they even sponsor Gentoo with amd64 hardware to get going? My reading of the nvidia copyright/README seemed to explicitly state repackaging the files was allowed (seemed almost encouraged). Changing the binaries is not (although why would you want to), where binaries are the .o files inside that are used as part of the linking. I certainly agree - the number of consumer desktops with the amd64 nVidia combination is staggering to the brink of almost becoming synonymous in the consumer electronics shops. Well ATI and nVidia seem to be fighting over who gets the bigger part of what intel doesn't own with their integrated video. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using Alioth Opteron net install to config MD raid1
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:05:21PM +0100, Rupert Heesom wrote: I'm using an Alioth net install CD to put Debian onto a new dual opteron PC using 2 SATA drives. I'm getting confused during the drive setup process. What I'm wanting to do is use the raid 1 setup with each disk having 3 partitions (as in a workstation install): root, swap, home. How do I setup md to work with these partitions? I seem to be able to use EITHER the 3-partition structure OR the RAID 1 structure (the install puts 1 ext3 partition into the RAID1 device). Can I do what I want to with this install? If I am not able to change these options, can I at least change the ext3 file system to an XFS system? (I think XFS is cool!) I just went through the hassle of converting a couple of partitions from XFS to ext3 (i386 running 2.6 kernel) because I had so frequent crashes where xfs leaked so many buffers the OS ran out of ram and died. No more XFS for me for a long time, at least when running nfs and samba of it on top of LVM and MD raid. With my setup, it seems ext3 has about 5 times the throughput of xfs, and the meta data access is probably 50 times faster than xfs. Something is really wrong with xfs in 2.6.5-2.6.10. Not sure about 2.6.11 yet, and I hopefully won't have to find out now that I managed to change to ext3 instead. As for the setup, I have done this: rceng02:~# fdisk -l /dev/sd[ab] Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 16 128488+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda2 17366329294527+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda33664 30401 214772985 fd Linux raid autodetect Disk /dev/sdb: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 55 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 * 1 16 128488+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sdb2 17366329294527+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sdb33664 30401 214772985 fd Linux raid autodetect rceng02:~# cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1] 29294400 blocks [2/2] [UU] md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1] 128384 blocks [2/2] [UU] md2 : active raid1 sda3[0] sdb3[1] 214772864 blocks [2/2] [UU] md0 is mounted as /boot with ext2, md1 is mounted as / with ext3 and md2 is a pv device for lvm with 3 lv's inside like this: rceng02:~# pvscan PV /dev/md2 VG MainVG lvm2 [204.82 GB / 0free] Total: 1 [204.82 GB] / in use: 1 [204.82 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ] rceng02:~# vgscan Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... Found volume group MainVG using metadata type lvm2 rceng02:~# lvscan ACTIVE'/dev/MainVG/Swap' [2.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE'/dev/MainVG/Home' [20.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE'/dev/MainVG/Data' [182.82 GB] inherit I didn't like / in LVM yet (although now that grub supports raid for /boot I have a much simpler setup than I used to have). It might be possible to just have /boot as one raid and then the rest of the disk as another raid with lvm running to allocate space to each volume as needed. Being able to add space and resize volumes and filesystems easily is really nice, so lvm is great. I suspect you can make partitions on md devices but I never had much luck with it since there aren't actually device names allocated for that, so it is simpler to use lvm to make partitions on an md device and have a few md devices for special partitions (like /boot). Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MD5 mismatches on downloads from ftp.de.debian.org
My local mirror has been complaining about md5 mismatches on pool/main/liba/libarchive-zip-perl/libarchive-zip-perl_1.14-1_all.deb pool/main/libc/libconvert-asn1-perl/libconvert-asn1-perl_0.18-1_all.deb pool/main/libp/libpng/libpng2_1.0.18-1_all.deb when I was syncing from ftp.de.d.o. Changing to syncproxy2.eu.debian.org has fixed it for me, suggesting that the problem is confined to the German mirror. It'd probably be a good plan to check all the files... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting a SCSI chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the SCSI chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles. --- Anthony DeBoer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: non-free package archive
On 5/13/05, Kaare Hviid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wasn't aware that you had done a proper audit of the licenses when I embarked on looking at it. Once finished, I found your mail, and rather than throwing away my own list, I replied you, thinking someone might want a second opinion. I have also read each of the dreaded debian/copyright files, (which nonfree.alioth.debian.org links to) and have tried to find further information when it was lacking. Our findings match up pretty good anyway, with the exception of libforms-doc (that I find clearly non-distributable), and moria and trn4 (where I didn't find anything compelling hindering distribution). libforms-doc doesn't seem to be distributable... I better move that to bad.txt... fast :) For moria, I found this, Moria may be copied and modified freely, but may not be sold or marketed IN ANY FORM I don't know what marketed IN ANY FORM refers to. To me, any form of advertising is marketed. Amd64 advertised on Debian mailing lists and such. I didn't feel comfortable. Lastly for trn4, no debian/*copyright file(s) I could extract. But I'm glad our independent findings matched up (on the conservative side) with the exception of my libforms-doc blunder. - Adam
Italian Rolex order Heather
REPLICASONLINE - WE NEVER COMPROMISE ON QUALITY Rolex replica is our speciality We guarantee lowest prices and highest quality We are the Direct manufacturers. For top quality rolex watchs pleas visit: http://www.replicas4me.net snakeroot uoo corinthian ytr [2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rolex is not for everyone, it`s for you Ralph
Hello, Thank you for expressing interest in Rolex Replica watches. This opportunity to offer you our fine selection of Italian/Swiss crafted Rolex Timepieces. You can view our large selection of Rolexes (including Breitling, Tag Heuer, Cartier etc) You are guaranteed of lowest prices and highest quality each and every time you purchase from us. Please do not hesitate to visit our website at http://www.replicas4me.net I certainly look forward to hearing from you. Thanks and Best regards, Philip Hull Sales Manager Rolex Watches Enterprises ballard mv portraiture cm coroner uv decaffeinate ogo sewage ymp gedanken mtq [2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: non-free package archive
Hello, thank you both Adam and Kaare, for checking all those copyright files. I just started building the distributable packages -- by tomorrow most of those non-free packages should be in the unofficial sarge archive. On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:44:47AM -0500, Adam M wrote: But I'm glad our independent findings matched up (on the conservative side) with the exception of my libforms-doc blunder. Kind regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Install iso images on cdimage.debian.org
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/amd64 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/amd64 *8) -- @,@ Il corpo del povero cadrebbe subito in pezzi [`-'] se non fosse legato ben stretto dal filo dei sogni -----Anonimo indiano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MD5 mismatches on downloads from ftp.de.debian.org
On 10288 March 1977, Steve McIntyre wrote: pool/main/liba/libarchive-zip-perl/libarchive-zip-perl_1.14-1_all.deb pool/main/libc/libconvert-asn1-perl/libconvert-asn1-perl_0.18-1_all.deb pool/main/libp/libpng/libpng2_1.0.18-1_all.deb when I was syncing from ftp.de.d.o. Changing to syncproxy2.eu.debian.org has fixed it for me, suggesting that the problem is confined to the German mirror. It'd probably be a good plan to check all the files... Mirror admin checked his files now, should be fixed. -- bye Joerg wiggy Memory is like gasoline. You use it up when you are running. Of wiggy course you get it all back when you reboot...; Actual explanation wiggy obtained from the Micro$oft help desk. pgpiagycucmkq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Strange aptitude behavior with bind9-host
Hi Looks like the bind9-host package is sticky... grover:/home/ed# aptitude update Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done Hit http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Packages Get:1 http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Release [111B] Hit http://amd64.debian.net sid/contrib Packages Get:2 http://amd64.debian.net sid/contrib Release [114B] Hit http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Sources Get:3 http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Release [112B] Hit http://amd64.debian.net sid/contrib Sources Get:4 http://amd64.debian.net sid/contrib Release [115B] Hit http://cyberspace.ucla.edu unstable/main Packages Hit http://cyberspace.ucla.edu unstable/main Release Hit ftp://ftp.nerim.net unstable/main Packages Hit ftp://ftp.nerim.net unstable/main Release Fetched 452B in 3s (137B/s) Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done grover:/home/ed# aptitude upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done The following packages have been kept back: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8 openoffice.org openoffice.org-debian-files openoffice.org-l10n-en xprt-xprintorg The following packages will be upgraded: bind9-host 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/108kB of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] Reading changelogs... Done (Reading database ... 164344 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace bind9-host 1:9.3.1-2 (using .../bind9-host_1%3a9.3.1-2_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement bind9-host ... Setting up bind9-host (9.3.1-2) ... Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done We have installed bind9-host grover:/home/ed# aptitude upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done The following packages have been kept back: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8 openoffice.org openoffice.org-debian-files openoffice.org-l10n-en xprt-xprintorg The following packages will be upgraded: bind9-host 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/108kB of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y Reading changelogs... Done (Reading database ... 164344 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace bind9-host 1:9.3.1-2 (using .../bind9-host_1%3a9.3.1-2_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement bind9-host ... Setting up bind9-host (9.3.1-2) ... Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descr Notice that it still thinks bind9-host needs to be installed. How do I find out why? Alternately, how do I fix it? TIA, Ed Tomlinson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange aptitude behavior with bind9-host
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:12:55PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: Notice that it still thinks bind9-host needs to be installed. How do I find out why? Alternately, how do I fix it? Run apt-get clean Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Install iso images on cdimage.debian.org
FYI, the 12 May net-install .iso doesn't seem to contain a kernel-image to install. The installer dies during the installation of the base-system because of this. Scott mtms wrote: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/amd64 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/amd64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc4: xmms
Hi, after my move to ppc64, xmms, all of a sudden, starts to segfault!? Why is that? Regards, Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MD5 mismatches on downloads from ftp.de.debian.org
On Fri May 13, 2005 at 15:53:27 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: My local mirror has been complaining about md5 mismatches on pool/main/liba/libarchive-zip-perl/libarchive-zip-perl_1.14-1_all.deb pool/main/libc/libconvert-asn1-perl/libconvert-asn1-perl_0.18-1_all.deb pool/main/libp/libpng/libpng2_1.0.18-1_all.deb when I was syncing from ftp.de.d.o. Changing to syncproxy2.eu.debian.org has fixed it for me, suggesting that the problem is confined to the German mirror. It'd probably be a good plan to check all the files... The mismatches come from an incorrect resync after the archive move. The contents of the files itself were actually ok. To fix the archive I've placed a little script in the root directory that wgets the corresponding files as rsync won't do it due to same time stamps and sizes. You could also just remove them and resync. Adam -- Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lackorzynski http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange aptitude behavior with bind9-host
On Friday 13 May 2005 18:35, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:12:55PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: Notice that it still thinks bind9-host needs to be installed. How do I find out why? Alternately, how do I fix it? grover:/home/ed# apt-get clean grover:/home/ed# apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages have been kept back: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8 openoffice.org openoffice.org-debian-files openoffice.org-l10n-en xprt-xprintorg The following packages will be upgraded: bind9-host 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded. Need to get 108kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n Abort. No luck with clean. Thanks Ed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: user dchroot does not work
Alexander Fieroch wrote: I also can chroot to my chroot-path as root and switch to the user. Then I can start every programm. The thing that's not working is dchroot as user. As root it's working too. Have all of your 'dchroot' calls used -d? Does it work without -d? The above makes me think you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH or some such variable set which is breaking bash in the chroot. The -d is preserving the environment. By going in as root and then switching to the user you are probably avoiding passing along those environment variables. So I would try it without the -d and then I would check the environment. Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Problem upgrading libc6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I went to check for updates using Synaptic just now and found that I have two broken packages (libc6-dev and locales). According to synaptic, the solution for this seems to be to upgrade libc6. However, when I do apt-get upgrade libc6 I get a complaint containing the following: libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-22) but 2.3.2.ds1-21 is installed locales: Depends: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22 But 2.3.2.ds1-21 is current in sid in the amd64 archive. Check your /etc/apt/sources.list file and determine where you are getting 2.3.2.ds1-22. Although it has been uploaded to Debian I do not see it propagated yet to amd.debian.net. apt-cache policy libc6-dev What does that command say? Mine says this: apt-get update ... apt-cache policy libc6-dev libc6-dev: Installed: 2.3.2.ds1-21 Candidate: 2.3.2.ds1-21 Version Table: *** 2.3.2.ds1-21 0 500 http://amd64.debian.net sarge/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status It then suggests that I run apt-get upgrade -f libc6. I think it actually said apt-get install -f. Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange aptitude behavior with bind9-host
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Looks like the bind9-host package is sticky...
Or has two different sources.
grover:/home/ed# aptitude update
...
grover:/home/ed# aptitude upgrade
...
The following packages will be upgraded:
bind9-host
...
grover:/home/ed# aptitude upgrade
...
The following packages will be upgraded:
bind9-host
...
Notice that it still thinks bind9-host needs to be installed. How
do I find out why? Alternately, how do I fix it?
What is the output of this command?
apt-cache policy bind9-host
I am guessing that there are multiple sources for bind9-host. They
are different. You are alternately installing first one and then the
other. I have seen this behavior from apt with other packages with
that problem. A local rebuild in a local depot was my problem.
What is the output of this command?
apt-get install --print-uris -d -y -qq bind9-host |awk '{print$1}' |xargs -l
I am guessing that as you install first one and then the other that
the URL printed will be changing from one location to the next.
Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Problem upgrading libc6
Bob Proulx wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-22) but 2.3.2.ds1-21 is installed locales: Depends: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22 But 2.3.2.ds1-21 is current in sid in the amd64 archive. Check your /etc/apt/sources.list file and determine where you are getting 2.3.2.ds1-22. Although it has been uploaded to Debian I do not see it propagated yet to amd.debian.net. Grrr... I thought I was checking sid but clearly my post shows me checking sarge. *** 2.3.2.ds1-21 0 500 http://amd64.debian.net sarge/main Packages But I think that explains the problem. In side not everything had settled after the libc6 upload. It looks to have settled now and the entire set of libc6 packages are now there. You probably simply caught sid while it was transitioning. Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
