Re: Virus Scanner 64 bits version ??
Hello, On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:11:58PM +0200, Thierry wrote: > I am looking for an free virus scanner running under 64 bits OS > Any idea ? clamav. You might want to use the volatile version, though: http://volatile.debian.net/mirrors.html Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: problems with netinst isos
> The etch netinst iso seems to be missing the isolinux.cfg file necessary > to get it going. Installation halts with a message about missing a boot > image from isolinux. When I compared the iso with the sarge iso, I could > see that etch lacked the .cfg file. Supplying the arguments by booting > from /install/vmlinuz with the parameters I saw in the sarge iso's > isolinux.fgm file didn't get me much further--couldn't find the root > filesystem. > > So, instead, I tried the sarge netinst iso. With this one, it booted ok, > but during installation wouldn't recognize that it was on a dhcp net. So I > configured the net parameters by hand, but it still couldn't download any > software. (I suspect not recognizing that it was on a dhcp net was > actually not being able to see the net at all.) I know it's not a net > hardware problem, since I can boot from a gnoppix cd and browse the net > without any difficulty. > > Any suggestions as to how to get things going? I'd really like to try the > 64 bit kernel on this box. well, i had same problem, but it was some months ago so can't remember exactly :- i got impression problem was that system looks for eth0 and eth1 at the same time...so make sure you configured net parameters on the right device and "down" the other (if exists). Hope it can help vale > > Cheers, > > David Udin > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problems with netinst isos
The etch netinst iso seems to be missing the isolinux.cfg file necessary to get it going. Installation halts with a message about missing a boot image from isolinux. When I compared the iso with the sarge iso, I could see that etch lacked the .cfg file. Supplying the arguments by booting from /install/vmlinuz with the parameters I saw in the sarge iso's isolinux.fgm file didn't get me much further--couldn't find the root filesystem. So, instead, I tried the sarge netinst iso. With this one, it booted ok, but during installation wouldn't recognize that it was on a dhcp net. So I configured the net parameters by hand, but it still couldn't download any software. (I suspect not recognizing that it was on a dhcp net was actually not being able to see the net at all.) I know it's not a net hardware problem, since I can boot from a gnoppix cd and browse the net without any difficulty. Any suggestions as to how to get things going? I'd really like to try the 64 bit kernel on this box. Cheers, David Udin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patch for #333999
tags 333999 patch
thanks
Hello,
As far as we do not support bi-arch/multi-arch configuration following patch
should solve the problem. At least it works for me.
Regards
Artur
--
Nie taki daemon straszny jak go killują
/z pamiętnika administratora/
diff -Naru rpm-4.4.1.orig/configure.ac rpm-4.4.1/configure.ac
--- rpm-4.4.1.orig/configure.ac 2005-02-13 20:50:02.0 +
+++ rpm-4.4.1/configure.ac 2005-10-16 17:40:02.049787601 +
@@ -1180,9 +1180,9 @@
dnl XXX Choose /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 for library installs.
MARK64=
-case "${target_cpu}" in
-x86_64*|ppc64*|powerpc64*|sparc64*|s390x*) MARK64=64 ;;
-esac
+dnl case "${target_cpu}" in
+dnl x86_64*|ppc64*|powerpc64*|sparc64*|s390x*) MARK64=64 ;;
+dnl esac
AC_SUBST(MARK64)
dnl Determine the canonical arch-vendor-os for the build machine
diff -Naru rpm-4.4.1.orig/popt/configure.ac rpm-4.4.1/popt/configure.ac
--- rpm-4.4.1.orig/popt/configure.ac2004-12-05 21:41:40.0 +
+++ rpm-4.4.1/popt/configure.ac 2005-10-16 17:40:10.725667121 +
@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@
dnl XXX Choose /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 for library installs.
MARK64=
-case "${target_cpu}" in
-x86_64*|powerpc64*|ppc64*|sparc64*|s390x*)MARK64=64 ;;
-esac
+dnl case "${target_cpu}" in
+dnl x86_64*|powerpc64*|ppc64*|sparc64*|s390x*)MARK64=64 ;;
+dnl esac
AC_SUBST(MARK64)
AC_CHECK_HEADERS(alloca.h float.h libintl.h mcheck.h unistd.h)
Virus Scanner 64 bits version ??
Hi, I am looking for an free virus scanner running under 64 bits OS Any idea ? Thx -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rosegarden4, not installable while related bug closed
Le 16.10.2005 14:12:44, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 08:19:01AM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > Hi, > > rosegarden4 is not installable on amd64 because it depends on kdelibs4 > and libqt3c102-mt. > > There ware a bug filled in the BTS for that #328014. It has been fixed > a long time ago by a NMU, see: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328014;msg=15 > > The binaries available for amd64 (1.0-1à are not in phase with the > source available (1.0-1.2). > > I managed to rebuild it from source. > What can be specific to amd64 in this case that prevents uploadding the > binary package? The problem is that it can't be build in sid. I have no idea how you did it, but it failed with the following error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: liblrdf0-dev: Depends: libraptor1-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages libcurl3-dev has been kept hold by aptitude due to dependancies problems. So I've it from sometimes before it was removed. The problem is that libraptor1-dev Depends on libcurl3-dev which doesn't exist anymore. It should get replaced by either the libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev version. Therefor, it's currently in dep-wait state waiting for libraptor1-dev (>> 1.4.7-1) Also see bugs.debian.org/333259 Thanks Kurt Regards Jean-Luc pgpPF6UxHI7f5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re[3]: my prog
Hello! Cheap programs for PC: http://www.geocities.com/hiqcodqwlj396/ Teliszewski Cantu Aguirre Kanayan Kipshidze -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rosegarden4, not installable while related bug closed
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 08:19:01AM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > Hi, > > rosegarden4 is not installable on amd64 because it depends on kdelibs4 > and libqt3c102-mt. > > There ware a bug filled in the BTS for that #328014. It has been fixed > a long time ago by a NMU, see: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328014;msg=15 > > The binaries available for amd64 (1.0-1à are not in phase with the > source available (1.0-1.2). > > I managed to rebuild it from source. > What can be specific to amd64 in this case that prevents uploadding the > binary package? The problem is that it can't be build in sid. I have no idea how you did it, but it failed with the following error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: liblrdf0-dev: Depends: libraptor1-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages The problem is that libraptor1-dev Depends on libcurl3-dev which doesn't exist anymore. It should get replaced by either the libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev version. Therefor, it's currently in dep-wait state waiting for libraptor1-dev (>> 1.4.7-1) Also see bugs.debian.org/333259 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where are backports for amd64 ?
Hi, In the amd64 how-to i read : "The porters team made available an unofficial stable release, complete with official security-, volatile and backports support." but i can't find where the backports are. Any help ? Thank you for your attention, Yannick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rosegarden4, not installable while related bug closed
Hi, rosegarden4 is not installable on amd64 because it depends on kdelibs4 and libqt3c102-mt. There ware a bug filled in the BTS for that #328014. It has been fixed a long time ago by a NMU, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328014;msg=15 The binaries available for amd64 (1.0-1à are not in phase with the source available (1.0-1.2). I managed to rebuild it from source. What can be specific to amd64 in this case that prevents uploadding the binary package? Jean-Luc pgpoynFdJUdis.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Configure Wireless ADSL
> /etc/network/interfaces file like so: > > auto lo wlwlan > > ififacelwlanininethdhcpwireless_key 123456789 > wireless_kekeymoderestricted | open] > wireless_mode [Managed | Ad-HoHoc > wireless_esessidot-an-esessid > Hope it helps :-) Yes thanks:) I have a working wireless on boot now... Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
