Re: Virus Scanner 64 bits version ??
Hello, On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:11:58PM +0200, Thierry wrote: I am looking for an free virus scanner running under 64 bits OS Any idea ? clamav. You might want to use the volatile version, though: http://volatile.debian.net/mirrors.html Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
can't mount raid 5 after installation
Hi all I'm installing a debian server with 4 sata drive on A8V motherboard. My system is on a 40 go ide hard disk and i've created a raid 5 during installation for my /home with the 4 sata drive. After reboot, i got this : # cat /etc/fstab | grep /home /dev/md0/home xfs defaults0 2 # cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf DEVICE partitions ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=4 UUID=06d1127c:93799654:8d865636:3fb5f9f1 devices=/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1,/dev/sdc1,/dev/sdd1 # dmesg md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27 md: md0 stopped. [...] libata version 1.02 loaded. sata_promise version 1.00 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:08.0[A] - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 18 ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFF163200 ctl 0xFF163238 bmdma 0x0 irq 18 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFF163280 ctl 0xFF1632B8 bmdma 0x0 irq 18 ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4673 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4663 88:407f ata1: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi0 : sata_promise ata2: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4063 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4063 88:407f ata2: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata2: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi1 : sata_promise Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6L160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sda: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 ieee1394: Host added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[0011d81af8a1] Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6B160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdb: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 ip1394: $Rev: 1224 $ Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] ip1394: eth1: IEEE-1394 IPv4 over 1394 Ethernet (fw-host0) sata_via version 0.20 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:0f.0[B] - GSI 20 (level, low) - IRQ 20 sata_via(:00:0f.0): routed to hard irq line 10 ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xD000 ctl 0xC802 bmdma 0xB800 irq 20 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC400 ctl 0xC002 bmdma 0xB808 irq 20 ata3: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4673 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4663 88:407f ata3: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata3: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi2 : sata_via ata4: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4063 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4063 88:407f ata4: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata4: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi3 : sata_via Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6L160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdc: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdc at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 ata4: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi3 : sata_via Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6L160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdc: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdc at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6B160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdd: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdd: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdd at scsi3, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 # mount /dev/md0 mount: /dev/md0: can't read superblock I have the same error (bad superblock) with reiserfs or ext3 fs on /home. So does any one know why can't i mount my /home and why do i have that kind of error ? I don't know how where to check for that superblock problem. Thanks. Ps : i have installed raidtools2 and raidutils -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:54:23AM +0200, kohzak wrote: I'm installing a debian server with 4 sata drive on A8V motherboard. My system is on a 40 go ide hard disk and i've created a raid 5 during installation for my /home with the 4 sata drive. # dmesg md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27 md: md0 stopped. That's a problem, isn't it? # mount /dev/md0 mount: /dev/md0: can't read superblock How about 'cat /proc/mdstat'? Ps : i have installed raidtools2 and raidutils raidtools2 as well as mdadm? Probably bad to mix them. raidtools2 is gone in unstable. Use mdadm. So it looks like your RAID group is not active. Did you tell mdadm to activate it on startup? (It asks you the question when you install the package). You can reconfigure it with 'dpkg-reconfigure mdadm'. You should be able to activate it manually with some combination of mdadm --assemble --scan; I can never remember the parameters for that tool though. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
You mean that i should have /dev/md0/home fd defaults0 2 and not /dev/md0/home xfs defaults0 2 ? Frederik Schueler a écrit : Hello, On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:11:50AM +0200, kohzak wrote: Ok, after reconfiguring mdadm i can mount my /home But after reboot, i still have the same problem. are the partitions of type fd (raid autodetect)? Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
Hello, On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:20:03AM +0200, kohzak wrote: You mean that i should have /dev/md0/home fd defaults0 2 and not /dev/md0/home xfs defaults0 2 no, the partition type must be fd, not the filesystem type in the fstab. you can easily find out with fdisk: fdisk -l should output something like this: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1393931639986 fd Linux raid autodetect then the kernel will autodetect and assemble the raid on boot. Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: apt-get error
Hi, I need to dpkg -i dpkg-reconfigure where can I get it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
So, i've wait until it finish to create the raid. # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid5] md0 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1] 480238656 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [] But same problem after rebooting : $ dmesg | grep md md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27 md: md0 stopped. # mount /dev/md0 mount: /dev/md0: can't read superblock Hamish Moffatt a écrit : On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:34:06AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: no, the partition type must be fd, not the filesystem type in the fstab. you can easily find out with fdisk: fdisk -l should output something like this: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1393931639986 fd Linux raid autodetect then the kernel will autodetect and assemble the raid on boot. Not if you use the Debian kernel with initrd. The initrd will make sure your root group (if any) is started, but you need the mdadm init.d script to start the rest. Hamish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get error
Le 17.10.2005 11:50:32, Dr Gavin Seddon a écrit : Hi, I need to dpkg -i dpkg-reconfigure where can I get it? dpkg-reconfigure is part of the debconf package. Jean-Luc pgpvNTqc4X59o.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Compiling a kernel module. gcc-3.3 vs. gcc-3.4
Thanks for everyone's replies on this. Much appreciated. I've built the module using gcc-3.4 and it's inserted into the kernel happily enough. (by changing the gcc symlink) When building, it offered up a few warnings about casting ints to different sizes to pointers. Because of this I was expecting it to just segfault the kernel, but it seems to insert without incident. I'll look at these errors later, when stuff starts to break :) I'm now having problems with linking some 32bit apps and I'll post another mail/thread. But thanks for the help so far. Cheers, James Mike Dobbs wrote: As far as I know, the kernel and its modules need to be build with the same version of gcc. If your kernel was build with 3.4 (see /proc/version), then you need to download gcc-3.4 and compile the modules with gcc-3.4. You'll need to either chance the symbolic link of /usr/bin/gcc to gcc-3.4 or change your comile options. - Original Message - From: James Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 11:28 AM Subject: Compiling a kernel module. gcc-3.3 vs. gcc-3.4 I'm having problems building and installing a kernel module for the amd64 port of debian. It seems that debian is shipped with gcc-3.3 as it's compiler, but it looks like the amd64 kernel is built with gcc-3.4 (from a syslog message I'm getting when I modprobe a driver) Oct 14 16:54:39 localhost kernel: mydriver: version magic '2.6.8-11-amd64-generic gcc-3.3' should be '2.6.8-11-amd64-generic gcc-3.4' Is this actually the case, and if so is this going to continue when this becomes an official debian distribution? Oh, and also what can I do about this? Do I have to fetch gcc-3.4 to build kernel modules? (Or rebuild my kernel with gcc-3.3) Thanks people. James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
kohzak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hamish Moffatt a écrit : Ok, after reconfiguring mdadm i can mount my /home But after reboot, i still have the same problem. Reinstall the kernel-image so the initrd gets rebuild and includes the raid modules and mdadm. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get error
Dr Gavin Seddon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I need to dpkg -i dpkg-reconfigure where can I get it? It is part of dpkg. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get error
When I try to reconfigure I get
'/usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: local is not installed'
How do I fix this?
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 09:46 -0500, Mike Dobbs wrote:
First, set your local, see amd64 howto. I think it's something like
dpkg-reconfigure local
Second, From what you emailed I'd make sure you have the latest ('u'), and
if that still doesn't work deselect sitebar. Though I don't see sidebars
errors here, just that the install failed.
As a side note, don't forget to include the list in your replies. There are
people more qualified to help you than I!
- Original Message -
From: Dr Gavin Seddon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: apt-get error
Hi,
It does this with anything I try to install. The rest of the relevant
output is
'Setting up perl-modules (5.8.7-6) ...
Setting up perl (5.8.7-6) ...
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = en_US:en_GB:en,
LC_ALL = (unset),
LANG = en_US
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C).'
This packagr was
dpkg
Thanks.
Setting up perl-suid (5.8.7-6) ...
Setting up debhelper (4.9.13) ...
Setting up libnews-nntpclient-perl (0.37-6) ...
Setting up rpm (4.4.1-2) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
sitebar
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 07:44 -0500, Mike wrote:
Sounds like some pacakge is returning an error code. Is this the
complete
error you get? What package are you trying to install?
- Original Message -
From: Dr Gavin Seddon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amd64list debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 6:51 AM
Subject: apt-get error
Hi,
Whenever I try to install, I get
'Errors were encountered while processing:
sitebar
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)'
Anyone know what's wrong?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get error
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:50:45AM +, Dr Gavin Seddon wrote: When I try to reconfigure I get '/usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: local is not installed' How do I fix this? Was that supposed to be 'locale is not installed'? If so, apt-get install locale. locale is requires for supporting multiple languages. I have no idea if the system can run without it and still display messages from programs that support multiple languages through locale. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
Some forum / faq speak about /etc/raidtab Do i have to create that files ? Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:11:50AM +0200, kohzak wrote: Ok, after reconfiguring mdadm i can mount my /home But after reboot, i still have the same problem. are the partitions of type fd (raid autodetect)? Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG FYI: Raid autodetection only works with the raid modules buildin into the kernel. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:52:39PM +0200, kohzak wrote: Some forum / faq speak about /etc/raidtab Do i have to create that files ? No, it's for the old raidtools, not for mdadm. Your /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf should look like this DEVICE /dev/sda* /dev/sdb* ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=e13cef12:a2742f19:acb223be:d5688af7 Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:54:23AM +0200, kohzak wrote: I'm installing a debian server with 4 sata drive on A8V motherboard. My system is on a 40 go ide hard disk and i've created a raid 5 during installation for my /home with the 4 sata drive. After reboot, i got this : # cat /etc/fstab | grep /home /dev/md0/home xfs defaults0 2 # cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf DEVICE partitions ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=4 UUID=06d1127c:93799654:8d865636:3fb5f9f1 devices=/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1,/dev/sdc1,/dev/sdd1 # dmesg md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27 md: md0 stopped. [...] libata version 1.02 loaded. sata_promise version 1.00 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:08.0[A] - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 18 ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFF163200 ctl 0xFF163238 bmdma 0x0 irq 18 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFF163280 ctl 0xFF1632B8 bmdma 0x0 irq 18 ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4673 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4663 88:407f ata1: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi0 : sata_promise ata2: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4063 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4063 88:407f ata2: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata2: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi1 : sata_promise Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6L160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sda: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 ieee1394: Host added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[0011d81af8a1] Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6B160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdb: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 ip1394: $Rev: 1224 $ Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] ip1394: eth1: IEEE-1394 IPv4 over 1394 Ethernet (fw-host0) sata_via version 0.20 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:0f.0[B] - GSI 20 (level, low) - IRQ 20 sata_via(:00:0f.0): routed to hard irq line 10 ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xD000 ctl 0xC802 bmdma 0xB800 irq 20 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC400 ctl 0xC002 bmdma 0xB808 irq 20 ata3: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4673 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4663 88:407f ata3: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata3: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi2 : sata_via ata4: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4063 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4063 88:407f ata4: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata4: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi3 : sata_via Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6L160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdc: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdc at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 ata4: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi3 : sata_via Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6L160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdc: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdc at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6B160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdd: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdd: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdd at scsi3, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 # mount /dev/md0 mount: /dev/md0: can't read superblock I have the same error (bad superblock) with reiserfs or ext3 fs on /home. So does any one know why can't i mount my /home and why do i have that kind of error ? I don't know how where to check for that superblock problem. Is the raid even started? (/proc/mdstat should tell you). Ps : i have installed raidtools2 and raidutils Install mdadm instead. It is much better and easier to use. Although given your mdadm.conf above, you probably don't even need raidtools* at all. Certainly above I see 'md0 stopped' and then it loads sata drivers. Does it ever start md0? Maybe you are starting mdadm before you load the sata drivers. List the sata drivers in /etc/modules, or have them included in the initrd by listing them in /etc/mkinitrd/modules. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
Lennart Sorensen a écrit : On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:54:23AM +0200, kohzak wrote: I'm installing a debian server with 4 sata drive on A8V motherboard. My system is on a 40 go ide hard disk and i've created a raid 5 during installation for my /home with the 4 sata drive. After reboot, i got this : # cat /etc/fstab | grep /home /dev/md0/home xfs defaults0 2 # cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf DEVICE partitions ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=4 UUID=06d1127c:93799654:8d865636:3fb5f9f1 devices=/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1,/dev/sdc1,/dev/sdd1 # dmesg md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27 md: md0 stopped. [...] libata version 1.02 loaded. sata_promise version 1.00 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:08.0[A] - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 18 ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFF163200 ctl 0xFF163238 bmdma 0x0 irq 18 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFF163280 ctl 0xFF1632B8 bmdma 0x0 irq 18 ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4673 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4663 88:407f ata1: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi0 : sata_promise ata2: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4063 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4063 88:407f ata2: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata2: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi1 : sata_promise Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6L160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sda: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 ieee1394: Host added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[0011d81af8a1] Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6B160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdb: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 ip1394: $Rev: 1224 $ Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] ip1394: eth1: IEEE-1394 IPv4 over 1394 Ethernet (fw-host0) sata_via version 0.20 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:0f.0[B] - GSI 20 (level, low) - IRQ 20 sata_via(:00:0f.0): routed to hard irq line 10 ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xD000 ctl 0xC802 bmdma 0xB800 irq 20 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC400 ctl 0xC002 bmdma 0xB808 irq 20 ata3: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4673 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4663 88:407f ata3: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata3: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi2 : sata_via ata4: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4063 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4063 88:407f ata4: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: lba48 ata4: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi3 : sata_via Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6L160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdc: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdc at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 ata4: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi3 : sata_via Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6L160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdc: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdc at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6B160M0Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdd: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) SCSI device sdd: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi disk sdd at scsi3, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 # mount /dev/md0 mount: /dev/md0: can't read superblock I have the same error (bad superblock) with reiserfs or ext3 fs on /home. So does any one know why can't i mount my /home and why do i have that kind of error ? I don't know how where to check for that superblock problem. Is the raid even started? (/proc/mdstat should tell you). Ps : i have installed raidtools2 and raidutils Install mdadm instead. It is much better and easier to use. Although given your mdadm.conf above, you probably don't even need raidtools* at all. Certainly above I see 'md0 stopped' and then it loads sata drivers. Does it ever start md0? Maybe you are starting mdadm before you load the sata drivers. List the sata drivers in /etc/modules, or have them Here is my /etc/modules : # cat /etc/modules # /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time. # # This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are # to be loaded at boot time, one per line. Comments begin with # a #, and everything on the line after them are ignored. ide-cd ide-disk ide-generic psmouse sbp2 sd_mod sr_mod No, md, that's may be why it don't start at boot. i will
Re: apt-get error
There's the prob. apt doesn't work. On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 08:54 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:50:45AM +, Dr Gavin Seddon wrote: When I try to reconfigure I get '/usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: local is not installed' How do I fix this? Was that supposed to be 'locale is not installed'? If so, apt-get install locale. locale is requires for supporting multiple languages. I have no idea if the system can run without it and still display messages from programs that support multiple languages through locale. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get error
list eb ftp://debian.inode.at/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contribapt-get install locale locale Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done E: Couldn't find package locale Thanks. On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 08:30 -0500, Mike Dobbs wrote: What happens when you type apt-get install locale What does your /etc/apt/source.list look like? - Original Message - From: Dr Gavin Seddon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Mike Dobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dr Gavin Seddon [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 8:24 AM Subject: Re: apt-get error There's the prob. apt doesn't work. On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 08:54 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:50:45AM +, Dr Gavin Seddon wrote: When I try to reconfigure I get '/usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: local is not installed' How do I fix this? Was that supposed to be 'locale is not installed'? If so, apt-get install locale. locale is requires for supporting multiple languages. I have no idea if the system can run without it and still display messages from programs that support multiple languages through locale. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 01:58:52PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: kohzak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hamish Moffatt a écrit : Ok, after reconfiguring mdadm i can mount my /home But after reboot, i still have the same problem. Reinstall the kernel-image so the initrd gets rebuild and includes the raid modules and mdadm. But it won't since the root filesystem is not on raid. (At least, it doesn't need to, so I don't think the initrd will set up the md.) Hamish My bad. Then I have no idea. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get error
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Dr Gavin Seddon wrote: list eb ftp://debian.inode.at/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contribapt-get install locale locale Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done E: Couldn't find package locale it's called locales, not locale, it's just a typo. bye, Giacomo -- _ Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA) Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222 Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916 _ When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are (Freddy Mercury) _ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get error
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dr Gavin Seddon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I need to dpkg -i dpkg-reconfigure where can I get it? It is part of dpkg. I ment to write debconf there: $ dpkg -S dpkg-reconfigure debconf-i18n: /usr/share/man/fr/man8/dpkg-reconfigure.8.gz debconf: /usr/share/man/man8/dpkg-reconfigure.8.gz debconf: /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure debconf-i18n: /usr/share/man/pt_BR/man8/dpkg-reconfigure.8.gz MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compiling a kernel module. gcc-3.3 vs. gcc-3.4
James Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks for everyone's replies on this. Much appreciated. I've built the module using gcc-3.4 and it's inserted into the kernel happily enough. (by changing the gcc symlink) Don't change the link. Set CC or similar. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
i've added sata_via and sata_promise in /etc/modules and i got my raid mounted at each reboot. It work great. thks for all your answers koh Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 01:58:52PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: kohzak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hamish Moffatt a écrit : Ok, after reconfiguring mdadm i can mount my /home But after reboot, i still have the same problem. Reinstall the kernel-image so the initrd gets rebuild and includes the raid modules and mdadm. But it won't since the root filesystem is not on raid. (At least, it doesn't need to, so I don't think the initrd will set up the md.) Hamish My bad. Then I have no idea. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 04:15:50PM +0200, kohzak wrote: i've added sata_via and sata_promise in /etc/modules and i got my raid mounted at each reboot. It work great. thks for all your answers OK that's good.. although if you have udev and hotplug installed, that should load sata_via / sata_promise for you well before the mdadm startup runs. udev runs as /etc/rcS.d/S04udev, while mdadm is S25mdadm-raid... Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgrading libc6
Hi everybody, During my last upgrade libc6 package was supposed to bee upgraded but it didn't as an error saying it didn't find /usr/bin/ldd showed. Digging a bit I saw that it is actually libc6 (and ia32-libs) who provides /usr/bin/ldd so I can't figure out how to solve this. I made a crappy ln -s from /usr/bin/lddlibc4 to /usr/bin/ldd but it didn't work either, and also I tried commenting the ia32 libs in the /etc/ld.so.conf and running ldconfig afterwards. Any ideas Thanks in advance trango
Re: Wireless on HP NX6125 (64 bit)
Richard Mace wrote: Hi, I recently bought an HP nx6125 laptop and have successfully installed Debian-amd64 on it. I have been monitoring this list for the past month or so, before I bought the laptop, and after further extensive googling I still cannot find the solution. I first installed Debian 32 bit on this machine and was able to get wireless working flawlessly using ndiswrapper and the WinXP Broadcom drivers supplied with the machine. Due to the double clock speed problem and enthusiasm for the amd64 port, I decided to try out the 64 bit version of Debian. Installation was a breeze, and I am now trying to get wireless working under amd64 (using ndiswrapper and the 64 bit drivers). I have tried the generic Broadcom drivers from linuxant and although they install with ndiswrapper -i, doing an ndiswrapper -l gives: netbc564 driver present but no hardware present. iwconfig does not show any wlan0 device :-( So, I tried the acer drivers for the Broadcom 4318 chipset. Now ndiswrapper -l gives: Installed ndis drivers: bcmwl5 invalid driver! Are you sure you downloaded 64-bit drivers? Try downloading again, using the link from my page http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/Main/Compaq_Presario_v2310us --Ken Bloom -- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:06:26PM +0200, kohzak wrote: Here is my /etc/modules : # cat /etc/modules # /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time. # # This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are # to be loaded at boot time, one per line. Comments begin with # a #, and everything on the line after them are ignored. ide-cd ide-disk ide-generic psmouse sbp2 sd_mod sr_mod No, md, that's may be why it don't start at boot. i will try in few minutes. I meant, if your root disk is ide but your /home raid is sata, I would think perhaps your sata drivers are only being loaded when discover/hotplug/whatever gets around to checking which devices needs drivers loaded, which is most likely way after mdadm runs and tries to start the raid. Do i have to add md in /etc/modules and /etc/mkinitrd/modules or just /etc/modules ? Thanks all for your help since this morning :) I would make sure the sata drivers are added to /etc/modules. That way to load early in the boot sequence, which is hopefulyl early enough for mdadm to be happy. modutils/module-init-tools runs at S20 (in rcS) whicle mdadm runs at S25. discover on the other hand runs at S36 which is to late for mdadm since it can't start the raid if the drives don't yet exist. That problably explains the md0 stopped message showing up just before the sata drives show up. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:28:16AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: OK that's good.. although if you have udev and hotplug installed, that should load sata_via / sata_promise for you well before the mdadm startup runs. udev runs as /etc/rcS.d/S04udev, while mdadm is S25mdadm-raid... Well discover runs at S36, and I am not sure udev (at least in sarge) does any driver loading. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
This one time, at band camp, Hamish Moffatt said: On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 01:58:52PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: kohzak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hamish Moffatt a écrit : Ok, after reconfiguring mdadm i can mount my /home But after reboot, i still have the same problem. Reinstall the kernel-image so the initrd gets rebuild and includes the raid modules and mdadm. But it won't since the root filesystem is not on raid. (At least, it doesn't need to, so I don't think the initrd will set up the md.) Put the names of the modules in /etc/mkinitrd/modules, one per line (just like /etc/modules) -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RE: can't mount raid 5 after installation
you shouldnt have to load any modules as long as they are configured as modules, all you need to do is create a /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf with the following (changed to your devices) DEVICE /dev/hd[bcd]1 ARRAY /dev/md0 UUID=3ab15009:10842ae2:c17e96db:d9376d90 And then modify /etc/default/mdadm and set AUTOSTART=true and hopefully if you have modified /etc/fstab to mount it correctly your system should mount home on start Thank you, Mark Adrian Coetser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tux-edo.co.za, http://www.thummb.com cel: +27 76 527 8789 tel: +27 11 805 2076 fax: +27 11 805 2330 -Original Message- From: Stephen Gran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 October 2005 08:01 PM To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation This one time, at band camp, Hamish Moffatt said: On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 01:58:52PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: kohzak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hamish Moffatt a écrit : Ok, after reconfiguring mdadm i can mount my /home But after reboot, i still have the same problem. Reinstall the kernel-image so the initrd gets rebuild and includes the raid modules and mdadm. But it won't since the root filesystem is not on raid. (At least, it doesn't need to, so I don't think the initrd will set up the md.) Put the names of the modules in /etc/mkinitrd/modules, one per line (just like /etc/modules) -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | -
Re: dynamic mounts and chroot jail woes (long)...
This one time, at band camp, Giacomo Mulas said: Question (request for help?): it would be extremely useful if bind-mounted directories could keep track of filesystems subsequently mounted, and keep things in sync automatically. Perhaps not as the default behaviour, but at least as an option. In this way, if I bind-mount /media to something in a chroot jail, I will automatically be able to access subsequently mounted filesystems under it from within the jail. Where would this need to be supported? In libc? In the kernel? Both? Would it be better/cleaner/simpler to have an user space daemon (i.e. something like famd) monitor some directories and automatically bind-mount and unmount their contents as needed? I am willing to invest a little time on this thing, but I am no kernel hacker and never messed with the libc, although I am a decent programmer, therefore I would definitely need help. I think you are going about it wrong, or looking at it backwards, or something. It may be helpful to note that filesystems are mounted _over_ an existing mount point, not under. So, if you have two directories: /media/pendrive /ia32/media/pendrive and you bind mount /media/pendrive onto /ia32/media/pendrive, you get exactly what is in /media/pendrive *right now*. When you later mount the actual pendrive _over top_ of /media/pendrive, it does nothing to what's underneath of it, and so the bind mount is unaffected. So, all that being said, your solution is actually not a bad one, and seems to work. If you want an easier to maintain setup, the only thing I can think off the top of my head would be a) hard linking the directory one level up (e.g., /media), this will of course only work if they are on the same file system. b) an automounter arrangement that mounted the removable/network media in both places. This seems slightly more difficult, but doesn't on the face of it, seem impossible. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: dynamic mounts and chroot jail woes (long)...
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:16:37PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: I think you are going about it wrong, or looking at it backwards, or something. It may be helpful to note that filesystems are mounted _over_ an existing mount point, not under. So, if you have two directories: /media/pendrive /ia32/media/pendrive and you bind mount /media/pendrive onto /ia32/media/pendrive, you get exactly what is in /media/pendrive *right now*. When you later mount the actual pendrive _over top_ of /media/pendrive, it does nothing to what's underneath of it, and so the bind mount is unaffected. So, all that being said, your solution is actually not a bad one, and seems to work. If you want an easier to maintain setup, the only thing I can think off the top of my head would be a) hard linking the directory one level up (e.g., /media), this will of course only work if they are on the same file system. You don't hardlink directories. b) an automounter arrangement that mounted the removable/network media in both places. This seems slightly more difficult, but doesn't on the face of it, seem impossible. Hmm. Auto bind mount on mount? The symlink looks cleaner with the original mount in the chroot location. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: running vncserver?
Thomas Besser wrote: Hi, found quite old bug reports (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=276948, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=276238), but it seems they are always atcual: vncserver crashes on startup or even does not compile. Is there no way to get any vncserver (tight, vnc3, vnc4) to run on amd64? I have patched the vnc4server sources (4.0-7) to use the Woody XFree86 4.3 sources instead of the old vanilla XFree86 4.2. Works pretty well. See http://bugs.debian.org/334135 Maybe I could upload my version to a public accessable machine? It is about 60MByte, so EMail doesn't work for me. Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: dynamic mounts and chroot jail woes (long)...
This one time, at band camp, Lennart Sorensen said: On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:16:37PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: I think you are going about it wrong, or looking at it backwards, or something. It may be helpful to note that filesystems are mounted _over_ an existing mount point, not under. So, if you have two directories: /media/pendrive /ia32/media/pendrive and you bind mount /media/pendrive onto /ia32/media/pendrive, you get exactly what is in /media/pendrive *right now*. When you later mount the actual pendrive _over top_ of /media/pendrive, it does nothing to what's underneath of it, and so the bind mount is unaffected. So, all that being said, your solution is actually not a bad one, and seems to work. If you want an easier to maintain setup, the only thing I can think off the top of my head would be a) hard linking the directory one level up (e.g., /media), this will of course only work if they are on the same file system. You don't hardlink directories. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ man ln | grep -A 1 \\-d -d, -F, --directory hard link directories (super-user only) HTH, -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: dynamic mounts and chroot jail woes (long)...
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said: This one time, at band camp, Lennart Sorensen said: On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:16:37PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: I think you are going about it wrong, or looking at it backwards, or something. It may be helpful to note that filesystems are mounted _over_ an existing mount point, not under. So, if you have two directories: /media/pendrive /ia32/media/pendrive and you bind mount /media/pendrive onto /ia32/media/pendrive, you get exactly what is in /media/pendrive *right now*. When you later mount the actual pendrive _over top_ of /media/pendrive, it does nothing to what's underneath of it, and so the bind mount is unaffected. So, all that being said, your solution is actually not a bad one, and seems to work. If you want an easier to maintain setup, the only thing I can think off the top of my head would be a) hard linking the directory one level up (e.g., /media), this will of course only work if they are on the same file system. You don't hardlink directories. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ man ln | grep -A 1 \\-d -d, -F, --directory hard link directories (super-user only) That being said, I just tried it, and it doesn;t work, so perhaps you're right :( Sorry - I was just going by that line in the man page. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: dynamic mounts and chroot jail woes (long)...
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:57:53PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ man ln | grep -A 1 \\-d -d, -F, --directory hard link directories (super-user only) It is VERY dangerous to mess with, and I believe not supported by most filesystems (for very very good reasons). mkdir -p a/b/c mkdir d ln -d d a/b/c/d mv a d I sure hope something makes sure that can't happen. The OS on the acorns used to fail to check that sometimes when using the GUI. THat made for some serious mess in the filesystem. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless on HP NX6125 (64 bit)
Hi Ken, Thanks for the reply. Bas van Besouw emailed me that he'd had success with linuxant's driverloader. I have since installed driverloader and used it to load the 64 bit Acer drivers linked to your page. I've had moderate success in that driverloader accepts the INF and SYS files and brings up an eth1 interface. I can run iwconfig to query it and I can also do an iwlist eth1 scan which correctly finds my AP. I set my essid, set mode Managed and then issue a dhclient eth1 which sends out a whole bunch of DHCPDISCOVERs, but no offers are received. Much the same happens when I use the other 64bit acer drivers I downloaded 80211g.zip. Under Windows XP I can successfully connect to my AP with the same machine. The same goes for ndiswrapper and the 32 bit drivers shipped with the machine under Debian i386--work flawlessly. I have tried fixing the channel number with iwconfig, setting up the correct interface in /etc/network/interfaces (and bringing up eth1 with ifup eth1), turning off MAC filtering on my AP and still I cannot connect (get an IP). (I am not using encryption.) I also re-tried ndiswrapper with the acer drivers linked from your page and they fail to load. Any other suggestions would be most welcome. My interfaces stanza goes like this # wireless lan home iface eth1 inet dhcp wireless-mode Managed wireless-essid default # default is my essid name at home Thanks. Richard On Monday 17 October 2005 17:47, Ken Bloom wrote: Richard Mace wrote: Hi, I recently bought an HP nx6125 laptop and have successfully installed Debian-amd64 on it. I have been monitoring this list for the past month or so, before I bought the laptop, and after further extensive googling I still cannot find the solution. I first installed Debian 32 bit on this machine and was able to get wireless working flawlessly using ndiswrapper and the WinXP Broadcom drivers supplied with the machine. Due to the double clock speed problem and enthusiasm for the amd64 port, I decided to try out the 64 bit version of Debian. Installation was a breeze, and I am now trying to get wireless working under amd64 (using ndiswrapper and the 64 bit drivers). I have tried the generic Broadcom drivers from linuxant and although they install with ndiswrapper -i, doing an ndiswrapper -l gives: netbc564driver present but no hardware present. iwconfig does not show any wlan0 device :-( So, I tried the acer drivers for the Broadcom 4318 chipset. Now ndiswrapper -l gives: Installed ndis drivers: bcmwl5 invalid driver! Are you sure you downloaded 64-bit drivers? Try downloading again, using the link from my page http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/Main/Compaq_Presario_v2310us --Ken Bloom -- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless on HP NX6125 (64 bit)
Richard Mace wrote: interface. I can run iwconfig to query it and I can also do an iwlist eth1 scan which correctly finds my AP. I set my essid, set mode Managed and then issue a It may or may not be an issue but AFAIR 'set mode' should be the first command as it resets the other settings. Try to do it first and then set up essid and other stuff. Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless on HP NX6125 (64 bit)
Thanks Max. Tried that. Still no DHCP offers. Maybe ndiswrapper is trying to tell me something that linuxant's driverloader isn't: perhaps these are the wrong 64 bit drivers for the HP nx 6125 (BCM 4318 [Airforce One 54g]). Any other ideas? Richard On Monday 17 October 2005 22:24, Max wrote: Richard Mace wrote: interface. I can run iwconfig to query it and I can also do an iwlist eth1 scan which correctly finds my AP. I set my essid, set mode Managed and then issue a It may or may not be an issue but AFAIR 'set mode' should be the first command as it resets the other settings. Try to do it first and then set up essid and other stuff. Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cdrdao maintainer and status (bug 249642)
I always found it strange that cdrdao (which is required by e.g. k3b) is not in the official AMD64 archive. Now I found this bugreport[1], already attached is a fix, which has been tested by quite a few people. And still the maintainer Andrew Suffield refuses to accept this patch in quite a strange attitude. I read a lot[2,3] of people complaining about the behaviour of asuffield, but did neither know nor care anything about it. But now I see it myself. Given such circumstances (these kinds of helpful responses), I can understand that the AMD64 team was a bit unhappy with the non-official status of the port before testing became etch. But what about now, to what extent is AMD64 official enough, to change this kind of behaviour? I guess further requests in the bug report are useless. Thanks for your work and patience (especially Goswin), Frank 1: http://bugs.debian.org/249642 2: http://mako.cc/copyrighteous/freesoftware/20050805-00 3: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/08/msg00074.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless on HP NX6125 (64bit) fixed
Found the error! In my haste to get driverloader working, I forgot to enable my trial license (the installation instructions at linuxant aren't that clear). Thanks to all who responded to help me get this sorted out. I summary: The 64bit wireless drivers on Ken Bloom's web page work with linuxant's driverloader on the HP nx6125 notebook. Now I just need to figure out how to fix the double clock speed problem (passing no_timer_check = 0 stops my fans...!) Many thanks Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upgrading libc6
if anyone is inteerested i solved it simlinking /usr/bin/ldd-ia32 to /usr/bin/ldd . and it worked. i suppose it isnt a pretty good idea to do it but... it worked :) trango On 10/17/05, trango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody, During my last upgrade libc6 package was supposed to bee upgraded but it didn't as an error saying it didn't find /usr/bin/ldd showed. Digging a bit I saw that it is actually libc6 (and ia32-libs) who provides /usr/bin/ldd so I can't figure out how to solve this. I made a crappy ln -s from /usr/bin/lddlibc4 to /usr/bin/ldd but it didn't work either, and also I tried commenting the ia32 libs in the /etc/ld.so.conf and running ldconfig afterwards. Any ideas Thanks in advance trango
SELinux and feneral protection rip on kernel 2.6.13.1
I have a problem with 2.6.13.1 kernel with SELinux enabled. While I'm using kernel with SELinux disabled (selinux=0) tverything works fine. Changing only this one kernel parameter to 1 makes machine impossible to boot (only general protection rip message repeating on a screen). I don't know where it fails but I think it is while /dev is being populated (using udev if it means something) or a few steps earlier while mounting root fs or changing root. I'll be thankful if anyone can help -- Registered Linux User 369908 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: running vncserver?
This would surely be very nice. I could provide the server: http://qt1.iq.usp.br/upload http://qt1.iq.usp.br/download Contact me privately for a user/pwd to the upload zone Michel. Em Seg, 2005-10-17 às 20:41 +0200, Harald Dunkel escreveu: Thomas Besser wrote: Hi, found quite old bug reports (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=276948, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=276238), but it seems they are always atcual: vncserver crashes on startup or even does not compile. Is there no way to get any vncserver (tight, vnc3, vnc4) to run on amd64? I have patched the vnc4server sources (4.0-7) to use the Woody XFree86 4.3 sources instead of the old vanilla XFree86 4.2. Works pretty well. See http://bugs.debian.org/334135 Maybe I could upload my version to a public accessable machine? It is about 60MByte, so EMail doesn't work for me. Regards Harri
Re: Compiling a kernel module. gcc-3.3 vs. gcc-3.4
Why should he not change the link? Changing the link is what I did. Why should the link point to one version of gcc or another? If anything, I would assume that you would want to point it to the version that corrseponds to the version that the kernel was compiled against, if for no other reason that to avoid this very issue. jamie. On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 04:10:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: James Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks for everyone's replies on this. Much appreciated. I've built the module using gcc-3.4 and it's inserted into the kernel happily enough. (by changing the gcc symlink) Don't change the link. Set CC or similar. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cdrdao maintainer and status (bug 249642)
Hello, On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:47:40PM +0200, Frank Siegert wrote: I always found it strange that cdrdao (which is required by e.g. k3b) is not in the official AMD64 archive. Now I found this bugreport[1], already attached is a fix, which has been tested by quite a few people. And still the maintainer Andrew Suffield refuses to accept this patch in quite a strange attitude. check out sarge-unsupported aka stinkypete: deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ stinkypete main (available on your favorite mirror) actually, it contains the following packages from maintainers who where not willing to add amd64 support to their sarge packages, or nobody cared to supply a patch for before the release: cdrdao mtr mtr-tiny sodipodi wmacpi Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: can't mount raid 5 after installation
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:01:22PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: This one time, at band camp, Hamish Moffatt said: On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 01:58:52PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: kohzak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hamish Moffatt a écrit : Ok, after reconfiguring mdadm i can mount my /home But after reboot, i still have the same problem. Reinstall the kernel-image so the initrd gets rebuild and includes the raid modules and mdadm. But it won't since the root filesystem is not on raid. (At least, it doesn't need to, so I don't think the initrd will set up the md.) Put the names of the modules in /etc/mkinitrd/modules, one per line (just like /etc/modules) That's unnecessary when the root is not on raid. When the root IS on raid, the initrd should do the right thing itself (it does here). Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless on HP NX6125 (64bit) fixed
Richard, Which kernel are you using? Bas On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:55:39 +0200 Richard Mace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Found the error! In my haste to get driverloader working, I forgot to enable my trial license (the installation instructions at linuxant aren't that clear). Thanks to all who responded to help me get this sorted out. I summary: The 64bit wireless drivers on Ken Bloom's web page work with linuxant's driverloader on the HP nx6125 notebook. Now I just need to figure out how to fix the double clock speed problem (passing no_timer_check = 0 stops my fans...!) Many thanks Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virus Scanner 64 bits version ??
Frederik Schueler ha scritto: Hello, On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:11:58PM +0200, Thierry wrote: I am looking for an free virus scanner running under 64 bits OS Any idea ? clamav. You might want to use the volatile version, though: http://volatile.debian.net/mirrors.html Best regards Frederik Schueler mmh..just a stupid question..do i need a virus scanner? r there virus for linux? i thought that was impossible to be infected coze how can a virus install itself if i use my os not as root? I'm just a newbie so i don't know so much about security on debian and GNU/Linux systems michele -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virus Scanner 64 bits version ??
Nothing is impossible! Yes linux as a non-root user is very secure especially today, but you should still have an idea of what you are running. That's why debian repositories are great, gpg signed, and maintained by good people. I think there are some virus scanner that run on linux, but don't waste your time. Linux is too secure, or too small of market (depending on the view) to get any real viruses as of yet. MD On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 01:58 +0200, Michele Concina wrote: Frederik Schueler ha scritto: Hello, On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:11:58PM +0200, Thierry wrote: I am looking for an free virus scanner running under 64 bits OS Any idea ? clamav. You might want to use the volatile version, though: http://volatile.debian.net/mirrors.html Best regards Frederik Schueler mmh..just a stupid question..do i need a virus scanner? r there virus for linux? i thought that was impossible to be infected coze how can a virus install itself if i use my os not as root? I'm just a newbie so i don't know so much about security on debian and GNU/Linux systems michele -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virus Scanner 64 bits version ??
The anti-virus is for Windows machines, you run the anti-virus on the Linux mail-server, http-proxy etc. in order to protect your users which mostly use Windows on their PCs Linux is leader in the server segment, where windows should never have penetrated. Michel. Em Seg, 2005-10-17 às 19:35 -0500, Mike Dobbs escreveu: Nothing is impossible! Yes linux as a non-root user is very secure especially today, but you should still have an idea of what you are running. That's why debian repositories are great, gpg signed, and maintained by good people. I think there are some virus scanner that run on linux, but don't waste your time. Linux is too secure, or too small of market (depending on the view) to get any real viruses as of yet. MD On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 01:58 +0200, Michele Concina wrote: Frederik Schueler ha scritto: Hello, On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:11:58PM +0200, Thierry wrote: I am looking for an free virus scanner running under 64 bits OS Any idea ? clamav. You might want to use the volatile version, though: http://volatile.debian.net/mirrors.html Best regards Frederik Schueler mmh..just a stupid question..do i need a virus scanner? r there virus for linux? i thought that was impossible to be infected coze how can a virus install itself if i use my os not as root? I'm just a newbie so i don't know so much about security on debian and GNU/Linux systems michele
Re: Virus Scanner 64 bits version ??
On 10/18/05 01:58:53AM +0200, Michele Concina wrote: mmh..just a stupid question..do i need a virus scanner? r there virus for linux? i thought that was impossible to be infected coze how can a virus install itself if i use my os not as root? I'm just a newbie so i don't know so much about security on debian and GNU/Linux systems michele Virus scanners on Linux are largely worthless right now since 99% of the definitions they use are for Windows viruses. But don't fool yourself into thinking that Linux is impregnable. The kernel has had it's share of local root exploits and most network daemons have had some kind of remote exploit in their lives. A virus may not be able to infect /bin/ls as your regular user, but it sure could delete all of your personal data and mail itself to your friends. And most people care more about their own data than their OS, I can install Debian sid in a very small amount of time but replacing all of my data would be virtually impossible since I don't back things up like I should =) I'm not recommending that you install a virus scanner, I'm just saying that you shouldn't be any more lax in your security procedures since you're running Linux. Jim. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virus Scanner 64 bits version ??
Don't get lazy just because you're running *nix.
If your unprileged user account got infected, it could still wipe out or corrupt
all of that user's data, and/or infect any binaries or source code writeable
by that user. Your command shell initialization/customization scripts are
executed at every login and usually an process running as your user
can set the permissions on these files to make them writeable by your user.
One Halloween somewhere in 1997-1999, the MIT chapter of Phi Kappa Sigma
advertised their Skuffle party using a virus that infected a user's
dotfiles. I remember
that the virus stored most of itself in ${HOME}/.../ In the MIT
Athena system, users'
home directories are on the AFS networked filesystem. A user with an infected
home directory would infect a workstation upon login, and all people
subsequently
logging into that machine would have their home directories infected.
After a centain
date, infected machines displayed a party advertisement as part of the
xlogin screen.
The machine may have had the root password hard-coded into the virus, since the
root password to the public workstations is available to all students.
On the other
hand, the virus would have been able to infect non-public workstations
if it aliased
logout (and modified configuration files to use a fake xlogout) to
display a fake login
screen and then used su (and some kerberos commands) to emulate the behavior
of a regular login.
I don't recall if the virus ran on Solaris, IRIX, and Linux Athena
stations, or a subset
thereof. In any case, it was certainly possible that the virus was
cross-*nix and
did not require root access to spread. I believe the majority of the logic was
implemented as tcsh scripts, with modified xlogin binaries dragged
along for the ride.
-Karl
mmh..just a stupid question..do i need a virus scanner? r there virus
for linux? i thought that was impossible to be infected coze how can a
virus install itself if i use my os not as root?
I'm just a newbie so i don't know so much about security on debian and
GNU/Linux systems
michele
Re: Wireless on HP NX6125 (64bit) fixed
Dear Bas, Again thanks for the help with driverloader. I am very happy that I now have wireless working wih amd64. I am currently running kernel 2.6.12 (amd64). It is a stock kernel. I am not running acpi/acpid, so some acpi kernel modules aren't loaded (reason: loading themal slows the machine down to snails pace due to passive (frequency scaling) being set for a temp of 16 deg C! I don't know the safe running temps of the Turion ML-37, and wireless seemed more pressing, so I haven't properly set up the thermal trip points--do you have any ideas?). Regards Richard On Tuesday 18 October 2005 01:50, Bas van Besouw wrote: Richard, Which kernel are you using? Bas On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:55:39 +0200 Richard Mace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Found the error! In my haste to get driverloader working, I forgot to enable my trial license (the installation instructions at linuxant aren't that clear). Thanks to all who responded to help me get this sorted out. I summary: The 64bit wireless drivers on Ken Bloom's web page work with linuxant's driverloader on the HP nx6125 notebook. Now I just need to figure out how to fix the double clock speed problem (passing no_timer_check = 0 stops my fans...!) Many thanks Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: running vncserver?
Harald Dunkel wrote: I have patched the vnc4server sources (4.0-7) to use the Woody XFree86 4.3 sources instead of the old vanilla XFree86 4.2. ^ PS: Sarge, of course. Sorry. Works pretty well. See http://bugs.debian.org/334135 Maybe I could upload my version to a public accessable machine? It is about 60MByte, so EMail doesn't work for me. Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
