Re: flash on mozilla
ramon kiedys napisal: Has anybody achieved flash on mozilla, firefox or epiphany ? I looked for flash-plugin on amd64 but had no success. I installed flash-player probing. Announces of flash-plugin needed disappeared but now I only get one-color-square in place of flash-spot. All suggestions welcomed. Thanks. I recommend chroot+firefox/epiphany/mozilla+macromedia flash player -- Registered Linux User 369908 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: flash on mozilla
I spent a bit of time on this - did not succeed but I do think that if you are running 32 bit firefox/mozilla and have the necessary libraries in your 32 bit emulation area (the default ia32 compat package does not have all necessary libs) this is going to work. n ramon wrote: Has anybody achieved flash on mozilla, firefox or epiphany ? I looked for flash-plugin on amd64 but had no success. I installed flash-player probing. Announces of flash-plugin needed disappeared but now I only get one-color-square in place of flash-spot. All suggestions welcomed. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SOLVED: Re: Asus A8N-E: /sbin/init: 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file
Hi Eugen, Happy to see my post about my succes using asus A8N-E was usefull to someone. But, as i'm using sarge, (with a custom kernel - 2.6.13) what is the NIC ? what part of that hardware am i missing ? Thank you for paying attention, Yannick Eugen Leitl a écrit : On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 09:18:08PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:57:09AM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: I've stuck with Ubuntu Server 5.10 AMD64 for time being, because it's a stable distribution, and recognizes the Debian Sarge (a stable release) is also available on amd64. I've tried that, but it doesn't support the hardware on that particular motherboard out of the box (e.g. the NIC is unsupported in stable, but is supported in unstable daily builds).
office 2003 in linux amd64 now work well
hello some week ago i ask if i can run office 2003 in debian gnu linux amd64 and i don't find any solution now i installed crossover 5 (trial version) in my debian amd64 and word, excel and powerpoint works well for me is only solutions because i dont' want restart machine every time i need word, excel, pp i like openoffice but openoffice in a industrial group works well if all users works with openoffice ciao -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mirror list
What has happened to the list of mirrors at http://amd64.debian.net/README.mirrors.html? ael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mirror list
yeah, it looks shorter to me...
Re: Mirror list
Yeah, you really should host a mirror - more mirrors means more places to distribute the bandwidth load. Tell me one thing though: is this OC-12 line into your house or workplace??? I've been trying for ages to get a ISP that'll let me host with even a bloody cable broadband connexion, however, since my area was one of the first to be wired with cable broadband, they're not going to re-wire it until hell freezes over (not the one in Alaska). Sorry, ISPs are a major sore-spot of mine... yeah, you should certainly make an effort to host a mirror. What locale would your mirror be in? the US? I think that there's a lack of mirrors in the US personally... I would love to remedy that, but as I said before, I'm in no situation to host anything, the least part of the problem being that my current ISP has me vow to *not* host anything. To host would be a breach of contract and then they could terminate my service for TV, phone, internet.. the whole works. If you ever are in a position to destroy a part of Comcast's property, please do so, since they've got a abhorrant stranglehold monopoly on my area... And as to fixing the mirrors list, it didn't change from where I browse. You sure it's work'n? We should certainly try to convince more of the other mirrors that host other bits of debian to add amd64 to their lists, since the i386 mirrors are many and fast, perhaps some of the more techno-literate among us should offer to help upgrade their mirrors, since the mirrors generally run themselves (it looks like that to me, anyways) and the main bits of pain are adding other parts of the repositories. We certainly should work harder to promote the amd64 architecture... I mean... we've been rather slothful, haven't we??? RedHat has had amd64 for a long while, and the amd64 architecture has been on the market almost a year in a half now (if not more... what was the first thing that goes?? I can't seem to remember... ; ) I can't claim much of the responsibity of not promoting amd64... but I think that there's a fair number of amd64 people running i386 (all those registers - unused! sniff...) so we certainly should be working either harder or smarter
32 bit firefox on amd64 system
Related to recent threads (installation of flash on firefox, etc). I've got a debootstrap ia32 system installed in /emul. The intent is to install firefox (i386) from tarballs at mozilla.org and use it without chrooting. I got past an initial missing libgtk-x11 library by installing it in the /emul area (by chrooting into the /emul/ia32-linux area and running apt) and running ldconfig. The next issue may be tricker - firefox/gtk seems to be looking in an exact location for pango libraries, finding the x86-64 versions, and failing: (firefox-bin:18830): Pango-WARNING **: /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Failed to load Pango module for id: 'BasicScriptEngineFc' (firefox-bin:18830): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (firefox-bin:18830): Pango-CRITICAL **: _pango_engine_shape_shape: assertion `PANGO_IS_FONT (font)' failed NOTE: /usr/lib/pango/1.4.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so exists on the amd64 host system. I'm considering some hacking like: symlinking /emul/ia32-linux to the root directory of the ia32 distribution, modifying ld.so.conf (ia32) to point only to these symlinked library areas, and running ldconfig (ia32 chroot). I have a funny feeling this is not going to work. Anyone with experience with these types of problems: any advice is appreciated. If I have any success I'll let folks know. Nathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mirror list
On 29 Oct 2005, lordSauron wrote: Yeah, you really should host a mirror - more mirrors means more places to distribute the bandwidth load. Working on it currently. I will notify all the appropriate people once I'm done with the initial rsync and am ready for the push part of the mirror. Tell me one thing though: is this OC-12 line into your house or workplace??? I've been trying for ages to get a ISP that'll let me host with even a bloody cable broadband connexion, however, since my area was one of the first to be wired with cable broadband, they're not going to re-wire it until hell freezes over (not the one in Alaska). OC-12 at home... Wouldn't that be nice! No, that's definitely at work (Texas AM University). There is no way I could afford the cost of that OC-12 personally. An OC-12 is roughly 622.08Mbps (either direction) while I only have a 5Mbps down/768Kbps up cable connection at home. I think we currently pay around $120,000USD for the OC-12 at work. Personally speaking, hosting anything of any size (this mirror for example) on a home connection is next to useless. I feel for you in looking for a decent provider in the boondocks. I have a friend in Northwest Washington who ended up going with DirecPC/Direcway (http://www.direcway.com/) because that was really his only option. He says the speed is decent (equivalent to slower DSL or cable modem service) but that the latency is pretty high. That's to be expected when the first and last leg of every route adds an additional 40,000 miles or so to the total distance! But I certainly wouldn't want to host any high traffic services on such a connection. It would be much better to lease a dedicated server elsewhere for this type of service, although prices are pretty high going this route too. Unmetered 20Mbps service starts around $239USD to give you an idea. Sorry, ISPs are a major sore-spot of mine... yeah, you should certainly make an effort to host a mirror. What locale would your mirror be in? the US? I think that there's a lack of mirrors in the US personally... I would love to remedy that, but as I said before, The mirror will be in Texas. As long as you have a decent connection at home, your downlink will most likely be saturated from this end. -- Mark Nippere-contacts: 832 Tanglewood Drive[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bryan, Texas 77802-4013 http://nipsy.bitgnome.net/ (979)575-3193 AIM/Yahoo: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GG/IT d- s++:+ a- C++$ UBL$ P---+++ L+++$ !E--- W++(--) N+ o K++ w(---) O++ M V(--) PS+++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP t+ 5 X R tv b+++@ DI+(++) D+ G e h r++ y+(**) --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- ---begin random quote of the moment--- Sleep sweet within this quiet room, O thou, whoe'er thou art, And let no mournful yesterdays Disturb thy peaceful heart. Nor let tomorrow mar thy rest With dreams of coming ill. Thy maker is thy changeless friend, His love surrounds thee still. Forget thyself and all the world, Put out each garish light: The stars are shining overhead - Sleep sweet! Good night! Good night! -- Ellen M. Huntington Gates end random quote of the moment -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
