linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system?
I'm running debian etch on an amd64 machine. I've got the right kernel installed and running: # uname -r 2.6.18-6-amd64 I'm trying to install the nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64 package. I can't find the package in aptitude. Aptitude only lists other versions: # aptitude search nvidia-kernel v nvidia-kernel-1.0.8776 - p nvidia-kernel-2.6-486 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for 486 p nvidia-kernel-2.6-686 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for 686 p nvidia-kernel-2.6-k7 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for k7 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-486 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-486 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-686 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-686 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-k7 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-k7 i nvidia-kernel-common - NVIDIA binary kernel module common files ... and legacy versions ... p nvidia-kernel-source - NVIDIA binary kernel module source I'm pretty sure I've got my /etc/apt/sources.list contents correct: deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib non-free I also know that the .deb exists here (http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/n/nvidia-graphics-modules-amd64/). When I download these and install them dpkg complains that I'm trying to install an amd64 package on a i386 system. # dpkg -i nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb dpkg: error processing nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) dpkg: error processing nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) Errors were encountered while processing: nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb Presumably this is why aptitude didn't list the package in the first place. Discussion here (http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=12966postdays=0postorder=ascstart=15) seems to indicate that I need to be running an amd64 system. So, here are my questions: 1. I'm running a 64-bit kernel, but am I running a 64-bit system? If not, how does one install a 64-bit system using the debian installer? Presumably then I could install the nvidia drivers? 2. Should I instead leave things as they are to use the official debian distribution and do something different to get the nvidia driver? 3. Given I can't compile the source code debian version or the version from the nvidia pages, is there a way forward? Finally, I've got another amd64 system with the same kernel, but this one does have the nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64 package installed. But I am at a complete loss as to how the systems are different: /etc/apt/sources.list is exactly the same and the kernel is exactly the same! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system?
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 16:46:01 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system? I'm running debian etch on an amd64 machine. I've got the right kernel installed and running: # uname -r 2.6.18-6-amd64 I'm trying to install the nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64 package. I can't find the package in aptitude. Aptitude only lists other versions: You need to upgrade to Lenny. You will need stuff from the sid repositories as well. Find the Debian Way nvidia installation guide with Google. # aptitude search nvidia-kernel v nvidia-kernel-1.0.8776 - p nvidia-kernel-2.6-486 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for 486 p nvidia-kernel-2.6-686 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for 686 p nvidia-kernel-2.6-k7 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for k7 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-486 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-486 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-686 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-686 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-k7 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-k7 i nvidia-kernel-common - NVIDIA binary kernel module common files ... and legacy versions ... p nvidia-kernel-source - NVIDIA binary kernel module source I'm pretty sure I've got my /etc/apt/sources.list contents correct: deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib non-free I also know that the .deb exists here (http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/n/nvidia-graphics-modules-amd64/). When I download these and install them dpkg complains that I'm trying to install an amd64 package on a i386 system. # dpkg -i nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb dpkg: error processing nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) dpkg: error processing nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) Errors were encountered while processing: nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb Presumably this is why aptitude didn't list the package in the first place. Discussion here (http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=12966postdays=0postorder=ascstart=15) seems to indicate that I need to be running an amd64 system. So, here are my questions: 1. I'm running a 64-bit kernel, but am I running a 64-bit system? If not, how does one install a 64-bit system using the debian installer? Presumably then I could install the nvidia drivers? Yes you are using a 64 bit system. You need to follow the recipe in the Debian Way nvidia howto plus helpful suggestions from e.g. Lennart Sorensen. 2. Should I instead leave things as they are to use the official debian distribution and do something different to get the nvidia driver? Get Lenny and modify the kernel. 3. Given I can't compile the source code debian version or the version from the nvidia pages, is there a way forward? deb-src repositories have the the code in there. You use gcc to make the new kernel. Its in the Debian Way nvidia installation guide. Finally, I've got another amd64 system with the same kernel, but this one does have the nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64 package installed. But I am at a complete loss as to how the systems are different: /etc/apt/sources.list is exactly the same and the kernel is exactly the same! Ignore it and carry on with the above. Regards Michael Fothergill -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Be a Hero and Win with Iron Man http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl001009ukm/direct/01/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system?
Neil Stewart wrote: I'm running debian etch on an amd64 machine. I've got the right kernel installed and running: # uname -r 2.6.18-6-amd64 I'm trying to install the nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64 package. I can't find the package in aptitude. Aptitude only lists other versions: # aptitude search nvidia-kernel v nvidia-kernel-1.0.8776 - p nvidia-kernel-2.6-486 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for 486 p nvidia-kernel-2.6-686 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for 686 p nvidia-kernel-2.6-k7 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for k7 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-486 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-486 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-686 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-686 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-k7 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-k7 i nvidia-kernel-common - NVIDIA binary kernel module common files ... and legacy versions ... p nvidia-kernel-source - NVIDIA binary kernel module source I'm pretty sure I've got my /etc/apt/sources.list contents correct: deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib non-free I also know that the .deb exists here (http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/n/nvidia-graphics-modules-amd64/). When I download these and install them dpkg complains that I'm trying to install an amd64 package on a i386 system. # dpkg -i nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb dpkg: error processing nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) dpkg: error processing nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) Errors were encountered while processing: nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb Presumably this is why aptitude didn't list the package in the first place. Discussion here (http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=12966postdays=0postorder=ascstart=15) seems to indicate that I need to be running an amd64 system. So, here are my questions: 1. I'm running a 64-bit kernel, but am I running a 64-bit system? If not, how does one install a 64-bit system using the debian installer? Presumably then I could install the nvidia drivers? Go here: http://www.us.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/ or here: http://www.us.debian.org/CD/torrent-cd/ find the link that says amd64: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r3/amd64/bt-cd/ for torrent http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r3/amd64/iso-cd/ for http/ftp download ^ Those are for the cd/DVD collection if you want it. Here for the netinstall: http://www.us.debian.org/CD/netinst/ this is what I use, pick the one you need, full install media or netinstall amd64 is what you want/NEED if you want a 64bit system. 2. Should I instead leave things as they are to use the official debian distribution and do something different to get the nvidia driver? change kernels back to K7/686 (K7 if you have an amd proc, 686 if intel) and install the nvidia stuff: see this page for the debian nvidia wiki: fool proof, just follow the directions: http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers 3. Given I can't compile the source code debian version or the version from the nvidia pages, is there a way forward? See answer for #2 above. Finally, I've got another amd64 system with the same kernel, but this one does have the nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64 package installed. But I am at a complete loss as to how the systems are different: /etc/apt/sources.list is exactly the same and the kernel is exactly the same! what does uname -a give out? I suspect on was 32bit and the other was 64bit (amd64) HTH! -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system?
Michael, I have to disagree with part of your answer: When I download these and install them dpkg complains that I'm trying to install an amd64 package on a i386 system. # dpkg -i nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb dpkg: error processing nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) dpkg: error processing nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) Errors were encountered while processing: nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb You said: Yes you are using a 64 bit system. You need to follow the recipe in the Debian Way nvidia howto plus helpful suggestions from e.g. Lennart Sorensen. yet dpkg says he IS running an i386 package: /package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) /Now you might know something I don't, but that looks pretty black and white to me. HTH -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system?
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 04:46:01PM +0100, Neil Stewart wrote: I'm running debian etch on an amd64 machine. I've got the right kernel installed and running: # uname -r 2.6.18-6-amd64 I'm trying to install the nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64 package. I can't find the package in aptitude. Aptitude only lists other versions: # aptitude search nvidia-kernel v nvidia-kernel-1.0.8776 - p nvidia-kernel-2.6-486 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for 486 p nvidia-kernel-2.6-686 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for 686 p nvidia-kernel-2.6-k7 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for k7 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-486 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-486 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-686 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-686 p nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-k7 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18-6-k7 i nvidia-kernel-common - NVIDIA binary kernel module common files ... and legacy versions ... p nvidia-kernel-source - NVIDIA binary kernel module source I'm pretty sure I've got my /etc/apt/sources.list contents correct: deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib non-free I also know that the .deb exists here (http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/n/nvidia-graphics-modules-amd64/). When I download these and install them dpkg complains that I'm trying to install an amd64 package on a i386 system. # dpkg -i nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb dpkg: error processing nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) dpkg: error processing nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (i386) Errors were encountered while processing: nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64_1.0.8776+6etch2_amd64.deb Presumably this is why aptitude didn't list the package in the first place. Discussion here (http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=12966postdays=0postorder=ascstart=15) seems to indicate that I need to be running an amd64 system. So, here are my questions: 1. I'm running a 64-bit kernel, but am I running a 64-bit system? If not, how does one install a 64-bit system using the debian installer? Presumably then I could install the nvidia drivers? 2. Should I instead leave things as they are to use the official debian distribution and do something different to get the nvidia driver? 3. Given I can't compile the source code debian version or the version from the nvidia pages, is there a way forward? Finally, I've got another amd64 system with the same kernel, but this one does have the nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-6-amd64 package installed. But I am at a complete loss as to how the systems are different: /etc/apt/sources.list is exactly the same and the kernel is exactly the same! You are running an amd64 kernel but an i386 system (which works fine, except for compiling kernel modules). To run a true 64bit system with both 64bit kernel and userspace would require reinstalling using the amd64 installer instead. I am sure it is technically posible to get the nvidia module compiled, but it could be a real pain. Personally I only run a 64bit kernel with 32bit user space on a build server at work that doesn't use X. At home I run pure 64bit on one machine, and pure 32bit on an older machine that isn't 64bit capable, and both work great. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: persona non grata...
Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I got an email asking me to leave the list. If you wish I will go. Please take a vote MF To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CONFIRM u050117460215084 Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 17:46:02 + It has been requested that the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be deleted from the debian-amd64 mailing list. It has NOT yet been unsubscribed from the list. To unsubscribe you need to confirm the unsubscription request by sending an email to the address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the Subject string: CONFIRM u050117460215084 With a reasonable good email program a reply to this message should be sufficient Do NOT remove or edit the CONFIRM ... text within the Subject header. If it is removed or changed, the confirmation will fail! The address listed above will be (un)subscribed as soon as your confirmation message is received. If the above address is incorrect, please don't send in the confirm message listed above. Instead, send a new (un)subscribe request with the Subject: subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] or unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] and wait for a new confirmation message. If you are unable to subscribe to our lists through this mechanism, please contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about Debian mailing lists, please see http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ In the event that you did not send a request to (un)subscribe, a copy of the (un)subscription request that follows below may help you discover who sent the request. -- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 1 17:46:02 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-policyd-weight: DYN_NJABL=ERR NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .hotmail. - helo: .bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail. - helo-domain: .hotmail.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2 IN_PM_RFCI=0.1 IN_ABUSE_RFCI=0.1, rate: -6.8 Received: from bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.111]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE2D13A5128 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 17:45:56 + (UTC) Received: from BAY104-W1 ([65.54.175.101]) by bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 May 2008 10:45:53 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain From: To: Subject: unsubscribe MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2008 17:45:54.0015 (UTC) FILETIME=[3402BEF0:01C8ABB3] Date: 1 May 2008 10:45:54 -0700 X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2007-10-04_01 _ Be a Hero and Win with Iron Man http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl001009ukm/direct/01/ mike, i think you are mistaken. this looks like a request to unsubscribe make in your name. just don't reply and it will not happen. unless you have some other email asking you to leave, but really, if the list owners wanted you gone, they would just unsubscribe you. -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: persona non grata...
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:25:29PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I got an email asking me to leave the list. If you wish I will go. Please take a vote MF It's unusual indeed for someone to be asked to leave the list. Are you sure nobody has faked an unsubscribe message apparently from your address? AndyC To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CONFIRM u050117460215084 Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 17:46:02 + It has been requested that the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be deleted from the debian-amd64 mailing list. It has NOT yet been unsubscribed from the list. To unsubscribe you need to confirm the unsubscription request by sending an email to the address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the Subject string: CONFIRM u050117460215084 With a reasonable good email program a reply to this message should be sufficient Do NOT remove or edit the CONFIRM ... text within the Subject header. If it is removed or changed, the confirmation will fail! The address listed above will be (un)subscribed as soon as your confirmation message is received. If the above address is incorrect, please don't send in the confirm message listed above. Instead, send a new (un)subscribe request with the Subject: subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] or unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] and wait for a new confirmation message. If you are unable to subscribe to our lists through this mechanism, please contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about Debian mailing lists, please see http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ In the event that you did not send a request to (un)subscribe, a copy of the (un)subscription request that follows below may help you discover who sent the request. -- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 1 17:46:02 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-policyd-weight: DYN_NJABL=ERR NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .hotmail. - helo: .bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail. - helo-domain: .hotmail.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2 IN_PM_RFCI=0.1 IN_ABUSE_RFCI=0.1, rate: -6.8 Received: from bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.111]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE2D13A5128 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 17:45:56 + (UTC) Received: from BAY104-W1 ([65.54.175.101]) by bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 May 2008 10:45:53 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain From: To: Subject: unsubscribe MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2008 17:45:54.0015 (UTC) FILETIME=[3402BEF0:01C8ABB3] Date: 1 May 2008 10:45:54 -0700 X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2007-10-04_01 _ Be a Hero and Win with Iron Man http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl001009ukm/direct/01/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system?
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:09:41PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: Sorry about this. I had forgotten that sometimes people put the 32 bit OS on the 64 bit machines. To me it seems like putting a diesel engine in a formula one car but there it is. Have you seen the Audi R10? Seems like a great idea. And a 64bit kernel with 32bit user space does have some advantages too. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: persona non grata...
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 18:45:30 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: persona non grata... On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:25:29PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I got an email asking me to leave the list. If you wish I will go. Please take a vote MF It's unusual indeed for someone to be asked to leave the list. Are you sure nobody has faked an unsubscribe message apparently from your address? AndyC Maybe they did. I received a similar message like this one when I was on the debian user list... As a result I unsubscribed. I took it to mean that I was no longer welcome on the site. People in the IT world often have poor social skills and take offence easily. I think I may have ruffled some feathers. Regards Michael Fothergill To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CONFIRM u050117460215084 Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 17:46:02 + It has been requested that the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be deleted from the debian-amd64 mailing list. It has NOT yet been unsubscribed from the list. To unsubscribe you need to confirm the unsubscription request by sending an email to the address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the Subject string: CONFIRM u050117460215084 With a reasonable good email program a reply to this message should be sufficient Do NOT remove or edit the CONFIRM ... text within the Subject header. If it is removed or changed, the confirmation will fail! The address listed above will be (un)subscribed as soon as your confirmation message is received. If the above address is incorrect, please don't send in the confirm message listed above. Instead, send a new (un)subscribe request with the Subject: subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] or unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] and wait for a new confirmation message. If you are unable to subscribe to our lists through this mechanism, please contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about Debian mailing lists, please see http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ In the event that you did not send a request to (un)subscribe, a copy of the (un)subscription request that follows below may help you discover who sent the request. -- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 1 17:46:02 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-policyd-weight: DYN_NJABL=ERR NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .hotmail. - helo: .bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail. - helo-domain: .hotmail.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2 IN_PM_RFCI=0.1 IN_ABUSE_RFCI=0.1, rate: -6.8 Received: from bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.111]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE2D13A5128 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 17:45:56 + (UTC) Received: from BAY104-W1 ([65.54.175.101]) by bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 May 2008 10:45:53 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain From: To: Subject: unsubscribe MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2008 17:45:54.0015 (UTC) FILETIME=[3402BEF0:01C8ABB3] Date: 1 May 2008 10:45:54 -0700 X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2007-10-04_01 _ Be a Hero and Win with Iron Man http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl001009ukm/direct/01/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Win Indiana Jones prizes with Live Search http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl001002ukm/direct/01/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: persona non grata...
On Thu 01 May 2008 13:25, Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I got an email asking me to leave the list. If you wish I will go. Please take a vote MF IIANM, this is not a request that you unsubscribe from the list. Rather, someone has highjacked your email address and sent in a counterfeit request for you to be unsubscribed and this is asking for confirmation. I would ignore it keep posting. cmr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CONFIRM u050117460215084 Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 17:46:02 + It has been requested that the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be deleted from the debian-amd64 mailing list. It has NOT yet been unsubscribed from the list. To unsubscribe you need to confirm the unsubscription request by sending an email to the address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the Subject string: CONFIRM u050117460215084 With a reasonable good email program a reply to this message should be sufficient Do NOT remove or edit the CONFIRM ... text within the Subject header. If it is removed or changed, the confirmation will fail! The address listed above will be (un)subscribed as soon as your confirmation message is received. If the above address is incorrect, please don't send in the confirm message listed above. Instead, send a new (un)subscribe request with the Subject: subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] or unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] and wait for a new confirmation message. If you are unable to subscribe to our lists through this mechanism, please contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about Debian mailing lists, please see http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ In the event that you did not send a request to (un)subscribe, a copy of the (un)subscription request that follows below may help you discover who sent the request. -- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 1 17:46:02 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-policyd-weight: DYN_NJABL=ERR NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .hotmail. - helo: .bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail. - helo-domain: .hotmail.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2 IN_PM_RFCI=0.1 IN_ABUSE_RFCI=0.1, rate: -6.8 Received: from bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.111]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE2D13A5128 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 17:45:56 + (UTC) Received: from BAY104-W1 ([65.54.175.101]) by bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 May 2008 10:45:53 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain From: To: Subject: unsubscribe MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2008 17:45:54.0015 (UTC) FILETIME=[3402BEF0:01C8ABB3] Date: 1 May 2008 10:45:54 -0700 X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2007-10-04_01 _ Be a Hero and Win with Iron Man http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl001009ukm/direct/01/ -- Debian 'Etch' - Registered Linux User #241964 More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: persona non grata...
Michael Fothergill wrote: Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 18:45:30 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: persona non grata... On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:25:29PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I got an email asking me to leave the list. If you wish I will go. Please take a vote MF It's unusual indeed for someone to be asked to leave the list. Are you sure nobody has faked an unsubscribe message apparently from your address? AndyC Maybe they did. I received a similar message like this one when I was on the debian user list... As a result I unsubscribed. I took it to mean that I was no longer welcome on the site. People in the IT world often have poor social skills and take offence easily. I think I may have ruffled some feathers. Regards Michael Fothergill To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CONFIRM u050117460215084 Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 17:46:02 + It has been requested that the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be deleted from the debian-amd64 mailing list. It has NOT yet been unsubscribed from the list. To unsubscribe you need to confirm the unsubscription request by sending an email to the address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the Subject string: CONFIRM u050117460215084 With a reasonable good email program a reply to this message should be sufficient Do NOT remove or edit the CONFIRM ... text within the Subject header. If it is removed or changed, the confirmation will fail! The address listed above will be (un)subscribed as soon as your confirmation message is received. If the above address is incorrect, please don't send in the confirm message listed above. Instead, send a new (un)subscribe request with the Subject: subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] or unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] and wait for a new confirmation message. If you are unable to subscribe to our lists through this mechanism, please contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about Debian mailing lists, please see http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ In the event that you did not send a request to (un)subscribe, a copy of the (un)subscription request that follows below may help you discover who sent the request. -- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 1 17:46:02 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-policyd-weight: DYN_NJABL=ERR NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .hotmail. - helo: .bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail. - helo-domain: .hotmail.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2 IN_PM_RFCI=0.1 IN_ABUSE_RFCI=0.1, rate: -6.8 Received: from bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.111]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE2D13A5128 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 17:45:56 + (UTC) Received: from BAY104-W1 ([65.54.175.101]) by bay0-omc1-s39.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 May 2008 10:45:53 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain From: To: Subject: unsubscribe MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2008 17:45:54.0015 (UTC) FILETIME=[3402BEF0:01C8ABB3] Date: 1 May 2008 10:45:54 -0700 X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2007-10-04_01 _ Be a Hero and Win with Iron Man http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl001009ukm/direct/01/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Win Indiana Jones prizes with Live Search http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl001002ukm/direct/01/ I am on both lists, no feathers ruffled that I noted. -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just got what may be another prank email.....
Dear folks, I think I have received another prank email. I will ignore further ones. Regards Michael Fothergill From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 18:45:31 + Dear subscriber, We've encountered some problems while sending listmail to your emailaddress [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the last seven days we've seen bounces for the following list: * debian-amd64 (http://lists.debian.org/bounces/v2lEDFmsbSgZDqcyhSHGlQ) (The link above points to a copy of the latest bounce and will be valid for seven days.) If those bounces pass a certain threshold, our bounce-detection will forcibly remove your subscription. If you are using 'Before-Queue Content filtering' and you think that this mail is wrong, you should whitelist liszt.debian.org from Content filtering. For more information see http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster/FAQ You are welcome to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you think this message was sent in error. Sincerely, The Listmaster Team -- http://lists.debian.org _ Be a Hero and Win with Iron Man http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl001009ukm/direct/01/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: persona non grata...
A Dijous 01 Maig 2008, Michael Fothergill va escriure: Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 18:45:30 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: persona non grata... On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:25:29PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I got an email asking me to leave the list. If you wish I will go. Please take a vote MF It's unusual indeed for someone to be asked to leave the list. Are you sure nobody has faked an unsubscribe message apparently from your address? AndyC Maybe they did. I received a similar message like this one when I was on the debian user list... As a result I unsubscribed. I took it to mean that I was no longer welcome on the site. People in the IT world often have poor social skills and take offence easily. I think I may have ruffled some feathers. Michael, don't search for bad people, or similar. Many times this kind of things are simple stupid questions than offense. Maybe exists a [EMAIL PROTECTED] or similar address and make some stupid mistake, or someone has confused his own mail address. Don't worry. Leo -- -- Linux User 152692 PGP: 0xF944807E Catalonia signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: persona non grata...
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Michael Fothergill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear folks, I got an email asking me to leave the list. If you wish I will go. I don't recall in particular anything that you have said (no offense intended; I try to ignore as much as I can of the flurry of email that passes through), and I don't recall anything passing through on this list lately that would be particularly ruffling of feathers, so I certainly see no reason to leave. It sounds as though someone may be pranking you; if anyone is deserving of an invitation to leave, it's them... -- http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. -- assortedly attributed to Albert Einstein, Benjamin Franklin, Rita Mae Brown, and Rudyard Kipling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I just got what may be another prank email.....
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 19:00 +, Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I think I have received another prank email. I will ignore further ones. Regards Michael Fothergill From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 18:45:31 + Dear subscriber, We've encountered some problems while sending listmail to your emailaddress [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the last seven days we've seen bounces for the following list: * debian-amd64 (http://lists.debian.org/bounces/v2lEDFmsbSgZDqcyhSHGlQ) (The link above points to a copy of the latest bounce and will be valid for seven days.) If those bounces pass a certain threshold, our bounce-detection will forcibly remove your subscription. I believe that this e-mail is more important (then the previous one) and it can't be completely ignored. Once I had been removed from the debian-italian mailing list because of the bounces. I had resolved this problem by changing a parameter of the fetchmail package (but maybe you use another mail reader). Regards Stefano -- Stefano Simonucci GNU/Linux User: #81790 http://counter.li.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: persona non grata...
On Thu May 1 2008 11:52:15 am Michael Fothergill wrote: Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 18:45:30 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: persona non grata... On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:25:29PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I got an email asking me to leave the list. If you wish I will go. Please take a vote MF It's unusual indeed for someone to be asked to leave the list. Are you sure nobody has faked an unsubscribe message apparently from your address? AndyC Maybe they did. I received a similar message like this one when I was on the debian user list... As a result I unsubscribed. I would subscribe again, it's up to you if you want to be on the list ruffled feathers or not (I didn't notice any). I took it to mean that I was no longer welcome on the site. People in the IT world often have poor social skills and take offence easily. I don't think so. It's a public list, for anyone who wants to subscribe. I think I may have ruffled some feathers. Probably a mistake of some sort. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system?
Thank you all very much for all of your help. I think you've solved this one. I do _seem_ to be running a 32-bit system after foolishly using a 32-bit CD. But one small point: How can I get the system to report which type it is? uname -a does not seem to work. what does uname -a give out? I suspect on was 32bit and the other was 64bit (amd64) On the known 64-bit system uname -a gives: Linux stewart 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 17:50:19 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux On the suspected 32-bit system with a amd64 kernel uname -a gives: Linux sdell03 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Apr 24 10:20:33 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux which would seem to suggest that I'm running a 64-bit system. But on the same suspected 32-bit system with a k7 kernel uname -a gives: Linux sdell03 2.6.18-6-k7 #1 SMP Thu Apr 24 09:09:38 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux Note the i686. So uname -a seems to give a kernel-dependent answer and not an answer dependent on which installer was used. uname -i gives unknown. Which command should I use to report the system type and not the kernel type. I think file gives useful information. On the known 64-bit system file /lib/libc-2.3.6.so gives: /lib/libc-2.3.6.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0, stripped but on the suspected 32-bit system file /lib/libc-2.3.6.so gives: /lib/libc-2.3.6.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.4.1, stripped Is there another way? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: persona non grata...
CMR, Micheal On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 13:45 -0500, C M Reinehr wrote: On Thu 01 May 2008 13:25, Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I got an email asking me to leave the list. If you wish I will go. Please take a vote MF IIANM, this is not a request that you unsubscribe from the list. Rather, someone has highjacked your email address and sent in a counterfeit request for you to be unsubscribed and this is asking for confirmation. I would ignore it keep posting. CMR, I believe that you right. As it happened I installed mailman on one of my servers today. To test your theory I just send an e-mail (the subject just said Test and so did the body) and I got a request to unsubscribe message back. If a spammer is forging Michael's e-mail address and also spamming the Debian AMD64 unsubscribe e-mail address (because their dumb software just scrapped it from a publicly archived record) then it is very likely that Micheal would get the unsubscribe confirmation request. Micheal, if you still have the original message then I suggest that you forward it to the -admin address. It might be that the list maintainers can track down where the trigger came from and improve their spam detection and rejection configuration. Steve signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system?
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 09:50:31PM +0100, Neil Stewart wrote: Thank you all very much for all of your help. I think you've solved this one. I do _seem_ to be running a 32-bit system after foolishly using a 32-bit CD. But one small point: How can I get the system to report which type it is? uname -a does not seem to work. dpkg --print-architecture what does uname -a give out? I suspect on was 32bit and the other was 64bit (amd64) On the known 64-bit system uname -a gives: Linux stewart 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 17:50:19 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux uname tells you the kernel architecture. amd64 kernels can run i386 binaries, which is what you are doing. On the suspected 32-bit system with a amd64 kernel uname -a gives: Linux sdell03 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Apr 24 10:20:33 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux which would seem to suggest that I'm running a 64-bit system. But on the same suspected 32-bit system with a k7 kernel uname -a gives: Linux sdell03 2.6.18-6-k7 #1 SMP Thu Apr 24 09:09:38 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux Note the i686. So uname -a seems to give a kernel-dependent answer and not an answer dependent on which installer was used. uname -i gives unknown. Which command should I use to report the system type and not the kernel type. I think file gives useful information. On the known 64-bit system file /lib/libc-2.3.6.so gives: /lib/libc-2.3.6.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0, stripped but on the suspected 32-bit system file /lib/libc-2.3.6.so gives: /lib/libc-2.3.6.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.4.1, stripped Is there another way? -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system?
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 09:50:31PM +0100, Neil Stewart wrote: Thank you all very much for all of your help. I think you've solved this one. I do _seem_ to be running a 32-bit system after foolishly using a 32-bit CD. But one small point: How can I get the system to report which type it is? uname -a does not seem to work. dpkg --print-architecture Yep, that's done it. On the non-confirmed i386 system: # dpkg --print-architecture i386 On the known amd_64 system: # dpkg --print-architecture amd64 Thanks again. Now I just need to get my chroot set up for flash and java plugins on iceweasel. Fortunately, there are some good howtos for this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: persona non grata...
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:25:29PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I got an email asking me to leave the list. If you wish I will go. Please take a vote [snip standard listmanager automated reply] Hi Michael, Someone sent an email to the unsubscribe address listed at the bottom of every email from the list, or they went to the website and entered your email address. Either way, the software sends a confirmational email to you just as it did when you first subscribed. I would encourage you to resubscribe to whatever debian lists you wish. I won't comment on the content of your posts other than to say I saw no feathers ruffled. If you had seriously breached protocol (the code of conduct), I'm sure the list manager would have sent you a private email and or just unsubscrbed you without you getting any automated email. It's a public list. To paraphrase StarTreck: To your list, welcome. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I just got what may be another prank email.....
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 07:00:54PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: Dear folks, I think I have received another prank email. I will ignore further ones. Regards Michael Fothergill I would contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED], just to be sure. Perhaps check your email inbox against the archives to see if you missed any email. Doug. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 18:45:31 + Dear subscriber, We've encountered some problems while sending listmail to your emailaddress [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the last seven days we've seen bounces for the following list: * debian-amd64 (http://lists.debian.org/bounces/v2lEDFmsbSgZDqcyhSHGlQ) (The link above points to a copy of the latest bounce and will be valid for seven days.) If those bounces pass a certain threshold, our bounce-detection will forcibly remove your subscription. If you are using 'Before-Queue Content filtering' and you think that this mail is wrong, you should whitelist liszt.debian.org from Content filtering. For more information see http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster/FAQ You are welcome to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you think this message was sent in error. Sincerely, The Listmaster Team -- http://lists.debian.org _ Be a Hero and Win with Iron Man http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl001009ukm/direct/01/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 kernel installed, but am I running a 64-bit system?
Neil Stewart wrote: Thank you all very much for all of your help. I think you've solved this one. I do _seem_ to be running a 32-bit system after foolishly using a 32-bit CD. But one small point: How can I get the system to report which type it is? uname -a does not seem to work. I like to use the file command: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file /bin/bash /bin/bash: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0, stripped (the /bin/bash can be any compiled executable or library) Hope this helps Brian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: persona non grata...
Michael Fothergill 18:52 Thu 01 May Maybe they did. I received a similar message like this one when I was on the debian user list... As a result I unsubscribed. I took it to mean that I was no longer welcome on the site. People in the IT world often have poor social skills and take offence easily. I think I may have ruffled some feathers. If so, don't sweat it. I've seen this list get emails with unscribe in the subject. Just some dumb joker. -- The software required Win95 or better, so I installed Linux. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
