Re: How to install wine on debian/amd64/sid?
Hi, to responding to myself... my apologies for asking the old dumb questions but in the middle of the transition I lost mi mind ;-) 2009/7/23 Jaime Ochoa Malagón chp...@gmail.com On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.dewrote: John Wong jo...@wonghome.net writes: Cavan Mejias 提到: 2009/7/19 John Wong jo...@wonghome.net: I add the below url to /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://www.lamaresh.net/apt/ sid main then apt-get update apt-get install wine but it always said: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wine: Depends: ia32-libs but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages Is it only me? I saw this message a few weeks ago. uname -a: Linux redcat 2.6.30-1-amd64 #1 SMP Sat Jul 18 12:55:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux cat /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free deb http://www.lamaresh.net/apt/ sid main Please help, thank you. Can you manually do apt-get install ia32-libs ? Does that succeed? Or if you are using Gnome can you locate it in Synaptic? (All the KDE package managers seem to be orphaned/nonfunctional). It appears you are using sid, therefore the ia32-libs may indeed be broken or have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming.. I use lenny and I think it works there. Good luck! I hope you get to install wine. Yes, when i manually do apt-get install ia32-libs, then it just show the message like this: --- Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wine: Depends: ia32-libs but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages --- When i use Synaptic, the result is the same like use apt-get, It ask me, i need to remove ia32-apt-get first: Yes/No, then i choose Yes, then Synaptic tell me, CAN NOT be install, becuase it depend ia32-apt-get. (-- i know do not know why) Yes, my system is sid/amd64, so maybe different to lenny. Anyway, thank your help. By popular demand ia32-apt-get no longer builds an ia32-libs transitional package. The one in the archive is cruft left over from the earlier version. how many votes are against ia32-libs transitional? doesn't matter, it is not needed anymore if ia32-apt-get is working 100% and nspluginwrapper could choose between both ia32-libs and ia32-apt-get is wine to be removed from the amd64 repos? whit the exception of wine the important ia32-packages usualy are external ones and they use to depend from ia32-libs and are happy with the transitional... The use of ia32-apt-get becomes obsolete this packages because usually anyone could get the i386 version... at this moment I prefer to have a previous version of ia32-apt-get (20) Not any more and neither then, while growing up of ia32-apt-get the ia32-libs got back to my system followed by amd64-versions of my ia32-packages installed with an acient ia32-apt-get and I got confuse all over again... Until today that I after a lot of trials, rm, grep etc, I been able to locate the /etc/ia32-apt directory and configure again my sources.list, by the way that information is not in doc/README.Debian Thanks again for ia32-apt-get Goswin... I also prefer the wrapper over apt-get (could it be optional in the package config?) That's true even now... If you want ia32-libs then you have to use testing. If you want to use ia32-apt-get then you need to install ia32-wine instead of wine. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org -- Perhaps the depth of love can be calibrated by the number of different selves that are actively involved in a given relationship. Carl Sagan (Contact) Jaime Ochoa Malagón Arquitecto de Soluciones Cel: +52 (55) 1021 0774 -- Perhaps the depth of love can be calibrated by the number of different selves that are actively involved in a given relationship. Carl Sagan (Contact) Jaime Ochoa Malagón Arquitecto de Soluciones Cel: +52 (55)
Re: How to install wine on debian/amd64/sid?
Jaime Ochoa Malagón chp...@gmail.com writes:
how many votes are against ia32-libs transitional?
doesn't matter, it is not needed anymore if ia32-apt-get is working 100% and
nspluginwrapper could choose between both ia32-libs and ia32-apt-get
Â
I've send a patch to mhy (the new ia32-libs maintainer should he ever
get around to upload) that will change the ia32-libs shlibs file so
packages build against ia32-libs would depend on ia32-lib... |
ia32-libs. If sources are rebuild against that then a transitional
ia32-libs is truely obsolete. But it still means a transition period
that is far from over.
is wine to be removed from the amd64 repos?
whit the exception of wine the important ia32-packages usualy are
external ones and they use to depend from ia32-libs and are happy
with the transitional...
The use of ia32-apt-get becomes obsolete this packages because usually anyone
could get the i386 version...
Â
Indeed. It just means manualy swaping amd64 packages for i386 for
those. Not perfect.
at this moment I prefer to have a previous version of ia32-apt-get
(20)Â
Not any more and neither then, while growing up of ia32-apt-get the
ia32-libs got back to my system followed by amd64-versions of my
ia32-packages installed with an acient ia32-apt-get and I got confuse all over
again...
Until today that I after a lot of trials, rm, grep etc, I been able to locate
the /etc/ia32-apt directory and configure again my sources.list, by the way
that information is not in doc/README.Debian
Thanks again for ia32-apt-get Goswin...
Â
It is in NEWS. I forgot to save the README when I build the package
and didn't notice till I closed the editor days later.
I also prefer the wrapper over apt-get (could it
be optional in the package config?)
That's true even now...
Â
Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz had the idea to create links for
apt-get, aptitude, dpkg in /usr/local/bin back to the ia32-*
binaries. Unfortunately the wrappers don't use the full path to
/usr/bin/dpkg so they loop back to the /usr/local/bin/dpkg (Fixed
for the next upload). I will pick up that idea and combine it with
what ccache does. People that want the wrapper under the original name
can then add
PATH=/usr/share/ia32-apt-get:$PATH
to their ${SHELL}rc and/or sudoers file or drop links in
/usr/local/bin. Whatever they prefer. I think this will be a great
solution for both people that want to keep their original
apt/aptitude/dpkg and people wanting wrappers.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#539278: lib32z1: not installable on kfreebsd-amd64/ppc64
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:16:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:00:11PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: In this case a Pre-Depends is overkill, a simple Conflicts is enough. Please find a patch below to fix the problem. Please confirm this with the amd64 porters. This whole transitions has been plagued with problems; the predepency was added due to breakage in the original transition plan. I'm not going to do anything with this without confirmation, this transition has been nothing but trouble. Note that this solution (suggested by one of the dpkg maintainers) is the one that has been tested and implemented for libc6-dev-i386. No problem have been reported so far, contrary to the Pre-Depends version which sometimes causes troubles to apt and aptitude. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#539278: lib32z1: not installable on kfreebsd-amd64/ppc64
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:00:11PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: In this case a Pre-Depends is overkill, a simple Conflicts is enough. Please find a patch below to fix the problem. Please confirm this with the amd64 porters. This whole transitions has been plagued with problems; the predepency was added due to breakage in the original transition plan. I'm not going to do anything with this without confirmation, this transition has been nothing but trouble. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#539278: lib32z1: not installable on kfreebsd-amd64/ppc64
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:41:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Note that this solution (suggested by one of the dpkg maintainers) is the one that has been tested and implemented for libc6-dev-i386. No problem have been reported so far, contrary to the Pre-Depends version which sometimes causes troubles to apt and aptitude. Given that and what you say on IRC I'll have a look soon. I'm very wary of anything to do with this transition due to the multiple issues with it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
NFS server fails after upgrade to lenny
I upgraded the server on my LAN to lenny a few months ago (after making a backup of the etch system (everything except user file systems)) in another partition. Now when I run lenny on the server, an NFS mount from a client machine fails with the message (hand-transcribed from screen; there may be typos) lovesong:~# mount /farhome mount.nfs: mount to NFS server '172.25.1.11' failed: RPC Error: Program not registered lovesong:~# But when I reboot the server to etch using the etch I saved in the backup partitions: lovesong:~# #mount /ferhome [514.141911] RPC: Registered udp transport module. [514.143371] RPC: Registered tcp transport module. lovesong:~# So the upgrade seems to have damaged something. Where should I look? And, by the way, I have installed nfs-common. That one seems to be there in the etch system, too. I'm currently running the server using my backup copy of the old etch system. I'd like to be able to move to lenny (and be ready for the now-looming transition of stable to squeeze), but right now it's infeasible. My users are all out-of-town for a few days, so it's now easy to boot lenny to diagnose the problem. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Este paga mesmo...
Ola Amigos! Este eu garanto, pois eu já recebi por duas vezes sem demorar 5 minutos foi eu completar o cliclo de cliques e atingir o limite minimo para saque eu cliquei e vim a receber imediatamente sem maiores complicações, vamos lá dêem uma chance a voces de ganharem tambem estes dolares que lá estão a espera de voces. Abraços e bom investimentos http://www.neobux.com/?r=nrcoimbra1 -- NRCoimbra
