Re: gnome 2.10 debs?
On 2005-04-02 13:47:21 +0100, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > Hello everyone. > > Has anyone came across the gnome 2.10 packaged debs for amd64? It would > be nice to try it out ;-). I've noticed experimental/testing kde 3.4 is > already available; is there anything similar for gnome 2.10? There are some first parts of gnome 2.10 in experimental (currently only some libs) but I haven't seen the remaining packages yet. Ubuntu has packaged gnome 2.10 already but I don't how much trouble it is to use their packages. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dpkg SEGFAULT with upgrade using gcc-3.4 (or 4.0) repos
On 2005-03-16 13:32:48 -0500, Scott Ransom wrote: > Hello all, Hello, > So I've just gotten bit by a SEGFAULT during a dpkg upgrade > using the 3.4 (or I guess gcc-4.0 archive). This occurred > after --force'ing the /usr/lib64 issue with the libc6 upgrade. > The messages can be found below. Any suggestions about how to > fix this? I've been seeing the same problems as you after the todays update of dpkg. I've fixed it for now with a rebuild of dpkg. If you really want to rebuild dpkg you need the patch from bug #299699 to get dpkg compiled with gcc-4.0. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No recent debs in the gcc-3.4 archive?
Hello, I'm using the gcc-3.4 archive but I didn't see any new debs in the recent days. Looking in http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/buildd-logs/ I can see build-logs from the last few days but I can't find the build packages in http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/pool. Is there something broken or is my sources.list not uptodate? Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libaspell15 (0.60.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4) from gcc-3.4 is broken
On 2005-02-17 21:12:50 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-Feb-17 17:44, Michael Bienia wrote: > > libaspell15 (0.60.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4) from the gcc-3.4 archive is broken: > > > > $ ldd /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15 > > /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3.4' not found > > (required by /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15) > > I just uploaded a fix for this. Please do an > > apt-get update > apt-get upgrade > > and check if it works then. Thanks, the new libc6 fixed it. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libaspell15 (0.60.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4) from gcc-3.4 is broken
Hello, libaspell15 (0.60.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4) from the gcc-3.4 archive is broken: $ ldd /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15 /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3.4' not found (required by /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x2aca) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x2ada4000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x2af9e000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x2b124000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x2b37) /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x5000) Could someone do a clean recompile? TIA Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libXrender 32bit seen somewhere?
On 2004-12-27 07:00:35 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Norbert Schultz wrote: > | > | Forgot to install package libxrender1 in your /emul/ia32-linux > environment? > | > > libxrender1 (amd64) does not contain any 32bit libraries. Take the deb for i386 and unpack it manually in /emul/ia32-linux. Untested: dpkg-deb -X libxrender1_0.8.3-7_i386.deb /emul/ia32-linux ldconfig Michael
Re: Acrobat reader
On 2004-12-11 16:52:33 +, Rafael RodrÃguez wrote: > Hi. Has anybody got acrobat reader working? Tried apt-get -b source acroread > from marillat's mirror but fails: I've got acroread working but I don't know a ready deb for it. I installed it through the tar.gz from the adobe website. I also installed ia32-libs to provide the required 32bit libs. You also need to modify the acroread wrapper script as described in http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2004/08/msg00321.html Michael
Re: openoffice installation
On 2004-10-16 22:04:16 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:49:03 +0200, Michael Bienia > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > openoffice.org-debian-files is in the openoffice.org folder and also in > > the pure64 archive. You need the one from the openoffice.org folder. > > That one from the pure64 archive needs a newer openoffice.org. Try > > > > apt-get install openoffice.org-debian-files=1.1.2-2+1.0.1 > > > > Then you should be able to install openoffice.org-amd64. > > Hmm. > > # apt-get install openoffice.org-debian-files=1.1.2-2+1.0.1 > E: Version '1.1.2-2+1.0.1' for 'openoffice.org-debian-files' was not found > [...] > > # apt-get install openoffice.org-amd64 > E: Couldn't find package openoffice.org-amd64 > > None of this seems to result in installing openoffice.org... > > Is there some extra site to point to in /etc/apt/sources.list? Yes, you need the openoffice.org repository on debian-amd64.a.d.o to get the mentioned packages. Add the following line to your sources.list: deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/openoffice.org/ ./ Michael
Re: openoffice installation
On 2004-10-14 15:58:32 +0300, Kari Ruohonen wrote: > I am running pure64 on athlon 64 system. Debian installed fine. Now, I > have added "deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/ > openoffice.org/" in my sources.list, apt-get updated and found > "openoffice.org-amd64" package. I apt-get openoffice.org-amd64 but get > the following error message: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > openoffice.org-amd64: Depends: openoffice.org (> 1.1.1+1.1.2rc3) but > it is not going to be installed > > If I try to add openoffice.org on the apt-get install line, another > error message stating that this time openoffice.org-bin is missing and > this package has no install candidate. > > I have ia32-libs and ia32-libs-openoffice.org installed. What else do > I need to do? openoffice.org-debian-files is in the openoffice.org folder and also in the pure64 archive. You need the one from the openoffice.org folder. That one from the pure64 archive needs a newer openoffice.org. Try apt-get install openoffice.org-debian-files=1.1.2-2+1.0.1 Then you should be able to install openoffice.org-amd64. Michael
Re: which directory pure64 or gcc-3.4?
On 2004-10-11 12:53:34 -0700, Kristian G. Kvilekval wrote: > What is the status of the gcc-3.4 repository? > Is it in a usable state and how complete is it compared > to pure64? I use the gcc-3.4 archive for some weeks now without a problem. I don't know about the completeness of the archive compared to pure64 but I don't miss any package. > Is it possible to just point apt at that repository to > upgrade. I changed the sources.list to gcc-3.4 and took care to update all packages to the gcc-3.4 ones especially ones which depend on libstdc++5. In the end I could remove gcc-3.3 and libstdc++5. Michael
Re: playing DVD: libdvdcss2 missing
On 2004-09-29 20:03:34 +0200, Tobias Krais wrote: > Dear List-Readers, > > I tried to play a DVD on my amd64 system and I am missing the libdvdcss2 > package. How o you solve this or are you waiting until there is a package? There won't be any package in the pure64 archive. As Christian Marillat doesn't provide amd64 packages you have to build the package yourself but you can use the source package from Christian to do it. Michael
Re: How to build a kernel which boots from SATA?
On 2004-07-22 22:25:39 +0200, Michael Bienia wrote: > So I tried to build a new kernel (2.6.8-rc2) but I > didn't get it to boot from my SATA disk. The installed kernel > (2.6.7-5-amd64-k8-smp) boots fine (module is sata_via). > I tried to compile all necessary drivers into the kernel but it didn't > boot (the error message was AFAIR > Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) ) > I also tried to use the configuration from the working kernel and only > change the needed options but I also didn't get it to boot (as I > normally don't use a initrd, is "mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.8-rc2 > 2.6.8-rc2" > the right command to build the initrd?). > > What is the correct way to build a kernel which boots from a SATA disk? I finally solved it and it boots now 2.6.8-rc3 from my SATA disk. If I unterstood some mails to linux-kernel correctly, accessing SATA disks through /dev/hdX has moved into a seperate option (BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA) which defaults to N and the description suggests not to activate it. SATA disks are now accessed as scsi disk (/dev/sdX). After I now also included scsi disk support (BLK_DEV_SD) (it wasn't used in the old kernel so I didn't include it into my new kernel) and switched from root=/dev/hde5 to root=/dev/sda5 it boots now. Michael
Please fix dict-de-en
Hello, the currently available dict-de-en deb from debian-amd64 is broken as the dict files are nearly empty: -rw-r--r-- root/root 336 2004-05-14 06:53:11 ./usr/share/dictd/english-german.dict.dz -rw-r--r-- root/root 336 2004-05-14 06:53:09 ./usr/share/dictd/german-english.dict.dz -rw-r--r-- root/root 102 2004-05-14 06:53:11 ./usr/share/dictd/english-german.index -rw-r--r-- root/root 102 2004-05-14 06:53:09 ./usr/share/dictd/german-english.index I've rebuild the package locally (without a change) and now the dict files look alright: -rw-r--r-- root/root 2035661 2004-07-30 22:02:40 ./usr/share/dictd/english-german.dict.dz -rw-r--r-- root/root 2071906 2004-07-30 22:02:27 ./usr/share/dictd/german-english.dict.dz -rw-r--r-- root/root 3514120 2004-07-30 22:02:39 ./usr/share/dictd/english-german.index -rw-r--r-- root/root 4146061 2004-07-30 22:02:26 ./usr/share/dictd/german-english.index A rebuild fixed it for me but as the package is arch all I don't know if a rebuild is really necessary. If I'm not mistaken a reupload of this package taken from the official archive should be enough. TIA Michael
Re: How to build a kernel which boots from SATA?
On 2004-07-22 22:46:16 +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > But I didn't > > get my prism54 card working (it works in my old i386 box). Reading > > http://prism54.org/phpwiki/Prism54%20Debian%20HowTo I assume some kernel > > options are wrong. > > comparing the kernel options, only CONFIG_STANDALONE=y is different in > the debian kernel. > This option is also set in the i386 kernels. On i386 I used a self-compiled kernel therefore I can't say if the debian i386 kernels work or not. What I get with the amd64 kernel is: - from iwconfig: | eth1 NOT READY! ESSID:off/any | [...] - from dmesg: | Loaded prism54 driver, version 1.1 | eth1: prism54 driver detected card model: SMC2802W nothing more, I don't see a try to load the firmware. The necessary modules are loaded: | firmware_class 12032 1 prism54 | prism5459736 0 (pci_hotplug is not available) > > Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) ) > > check your lilo.conf: setup the old (debian-)kernel to boot with > ramdisk, and the new selfcompiled one without. I use grub. This is from my last try (same config as 2.6.7-5-amd64-k8 but CONFIG_STANDALONE=n): | title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.8-rc2 | root(hd0,4) | kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.8-rc2 root=/dev/hde5 ro | initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.8-rc2 | savedefault | boot # ll /boot/initrd.img-2.6.8-rc2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4354048 Jul 22 20:46 /boot/initrd.img-2.6.8-rc2 looks ok to me. When trying to boot this kernel the last I see is (from my head): - something about unloading some modules - an error message (dev/console not found) - and then Kernel panic: tried to kill init Michael
Re: How to build a kernel which boots from SATA?
On 2004-07-22 22:36:33 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 10:25:39PM +0200, Michael Bienia wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've got a new amd64 box and so far everything works fine. But I didn't > > get my prism54 card working (it works in my old i386 box). Reading > > http://prism54.org/phpwiki/Prism54%20Debian%20HowTo I assume some kernel > > options are wrong. So I tried to build a new kernel (2.6.8-rc2) but I > > didn't get it to boot from my SATA disk. The installed kernel > > (2.6.7-5-amd64-k8-smp) boots fine (module is sata_via). > > Maybe you also have an other module for it? sata_via makes it > /dev/sda while there is a driver (forgot it's name) that makes it > /dev/hde. The current root device is /dev/hde5. # lsmod | grep ata sata_via8772 0 libata 46088 1 sata_via scsi_mod 140096 1 libata In my monolithic kernel config I had: CONFIG_SCSI=y CONFIG_SCSI_SATA=y CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_VIA=y Is there something missing for compiled-in SATA support? I tried to boot this kernel also with root=/dev/sda5 but the kernel gives the same error. I also don't remember to see something about SATA scroll by (maybe I missed it) Michael
How to build a kernel which boots from SATA?
Hello, I've got a new amd64 box and so far everything works fine. But I didn't get my prism54 card working (it works in my old i386 box). Reading http://prism54.org/phpwiki/Prism54%20Debian%20HowTo I assume some kernel options are wrong. So I tried to build a new kernel (2.6.8-rc2) but I didn't get it to boot from my SATA disk. The installed kernel (2.6.7-5-amd64-k8-smp) boots fine (module is sata_via). I tried to compile all necessary drivers into the kernel but it didn't boot (the error message was AFAIR Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) ) I also tried to use the configuration from the working kernel and only change the needed options but I also didn't get it to boot (as I normally don't use a initrd, is "mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.8-rc2 2.6.8-rc2" the right command to build the initrd?). What is the correct way to build a kernel which boots from a SATA disk? Michael
