Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 08:58:35 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:59:23AM +0200, Anders Helmersson wrote: > > I have tried powernowd on my A8V Deluxe with an AMD64 3200+ (Winchester > > core). When it runs at 1000MHz the core voltage is set to 1.1V, which I > > suspect is too low for running stably. Maybe the motherboard gives a > > too low voltage or the 1.1V is simply to low for my processor. > > Well AMD says it should run at 1.1V at that cpu speed. Of course that > means a 1.1V steady reliable power source, not one fluctuating between > 1.0 and 1.2 (although Asus tends to have rather good power convertors on > their boards, although they still need a decent 12V feed). Could it be a memory problem? > I have tried acpi-cpufreq and that seemed to work on an athlon64 mobile > 3200+ at least. Seemed perfectly stable to me. I will try that, thanks for your suggestion. > > I need to add that I have replaced the boxed fan (the mb handbook > > states that QnQ only works with the boxed fan and heatsink). I am > > controlling the CPU and chassis fan with the fancontrol script in the > > lm-sensors package. > > Just make sure you don't let the cpu overheat. With my settings, at idle the cpu runs at 32°C and at full load about 39°C (according to sensors reading) at a room temperature of 23°C. I guess this is safe even considering a conservative margin for the temperature readings. Or do you allude to that the fancontrol script bundled with lm-sensors can be unreliable? Anders
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:59:23AM +0200, Anders Helmersson wrote: > I have tried powernowd on my A8V Deluxe with an AMD64 3200+ (Winchester > core). When it runs at 1000MHz the core voltage is set to 1.1V, which I > suspect is too low for running stably. Maybe the motherboard gives a > too low voltage or the 1.1V is simply to low for my processor. Well AMD says it should run at 1.1V at that cpu speed. Of course that means a 1.1V steady reliable power source, not one fluctuating between 1.0 and 1.2 (although Asus tends to have rather good power convertors on their boards, although they still need a decent 12V feed). > By manually setting the vcore in the bios I can run at 1.3V at 2000MHz > without any noticeable problems. The nominal value is 1.4 at 2000MHz, > 1.35 at 1800MHz, and 1.1V at 1000MHz. I haven't found any way to adjust > these vcore settings, when running in Cool'n'Quiet mode. You shouldn't need to mess with the voltages. They should be provided by the bios and cpu. I have tried acpi-cpufreq and that seemed to work on an athlon64 mobile 3200+ at least. Seemed perfectly stable to me. > I need to add that I have replaced the boxed fan (the mb handbook > states that QnQ only works with the boxed fan and heatsink). I am > controlling the CPU and chassis fan with the fancontrol script in the > lm-sensors package. Just make sure you don't let the cpu overheat. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:06:39PM -0300, Peter Cordes wrote: > I'd been ignoring my Debian inbox for a long time until today... > > I have an Asus K8V (basic) with an Athlon64 3200+ (newcastle core) 1.5GB of > RAM, two IDE disks, two SATA disks, and an ATI AIW Radeon 7200 (but I don't > use the TV in/out features). I run x86 2.6.12.6. I'll eventually switch to > AMD64 software when I know my hardware is stable with x86, so I can usefully > make bug reports on crashing software... > > BTW, the K8V is a nice piece of hardware; the AD1980 sound hardware > supports mixing PCM streams in hardware (or at least the driver does?), so I > can have xmms, xine, and whatever other program all not interfering with > each other. (except when something is doing 4 channel output). I couldn't > decide between an Abit (I think) with a K8T800Pro chipset and my Asus with > just K8T800, but I eventually chose the Asus because it had Analog Devices > sound instead of Realtek. I was pleasantly surprised that the sound really > was good on it, esp. with the multiple opens of the sound dev :) > > I've found that my machine is a lot less stable when running at lower than > max speed. Not just stuff crashing, but memtest (from sysutils, or > memtester; just mlock()s some memory to test, not like memtest86+). memtest > finds errors when the CPU is slowed down. There might be other correlated > factors, like disk access. To change speed, I've just used cpufreq-set -u > 2000MHz (or 1800MHz, or 1000MHz). Max speed is 2200MHz. (Newcastle core: > from dmidecode: ID: C0 0F 00 00 FF FB 8B 07 > Signature: Extended Family 0, Model C, Stepping 0 > ) > > Unfortunately, the machine isn't perfectly stable even at max speed. It > never crashed before I upgraded the BIOS from 1.04 or something to 1.07, > which was needed for cpufreq to work. Even when running at 2.2GHz (full > speed) with only one stick of RAM (1024MB OCZ), it sometimes shows a cluster > of memory errors in memtest. It doesn't seem significantly different from > with both sticks of RAM, the other being a 512MB Infineon, IIRC. All DDR400. > > Run 129 completed in 357 seconds (0 tests showed errors). > Run 130: > Test 1: Stuck Address: Testing...Passed. > Test 2: Random value: Setting...Testing... > FAILURE: 0x7ffeebc8 != 0x7efeebc8 at offset 0x01ca67f0. > Skipping to next test... > Test 3:XOR comparison: Setting...Testing... > FAILURE: 0x42ff4c7a != 0x43ff4c7a at offset 0x01ca67f0. > Skipping to next test... > Test 4:SUB comparison: Setting...Testing... > FAILURE: 0x2707802e != 0x2807802e at offset 0x01ca67f0. > Skipping to next test... > Test 5:MUL comparison: Setting...Testing... > FAILURE: 0x73c9b7ae != 0xb4c9b7ae at offset 0x01ca67f0. > Skipping to next test... > Test 6:DIV comparison: Setting...Testing... > FAILURE: 0x != 0x0001 at offset 0x01ca67f0. > Skipping to next test... > Test 7: OR comparison: Setting...Testing... > FAILURE: 0xb2dd75dc != 0xb2dd75dd at offset 0x01ca67f0. > Skipping to next test... > Test 8:AND comparison: Setting...Testing...Passed. > Test 9: Sequential Increment: Setting...Testing...Passed. > Test 10:Solid Bits: Testing...Passed. Well seeing the same address fail each test is a bad sign. Maybe one stick of memory has some flacky bits. That would make things unstable since it would work sometimes, but not all the time. > BIOS on all auto settings. > no other runs showed errors (140 runs) > > (Running at lower CPU speeds, errors were much more frequent). Not sure why it would, although if the memory is flacky, who knows. > Interesting that all the errors are clustered in time and space at one > memory location... As I said, the software running is Debian i386 sid with > Linux 2.6.12.6, compiled with gcc 4.0.2 20050816 (from sid). If there is a defect in a memory chip, it is quite likely to be localized to one part of the die in the memory chip. > Does anyone have any ideas? I hate hardware I can't trust! What's the > point of digital logic if it makes mistakes! > > So does anyone have any experience or advice? Try one stick of ram at a time. Most likely it is just one of the sticks that has errors. If you get errors in memtest with both, then the cpu may have a defective memory controller. Another posibility is that your power supply is crap and isn't providing a steady enough power supply for the system. athlon 64s demand very reliable power. A cheap 500W often provides less power than a good 300W due to having unstable voltage levels under load. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:06:43PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > What happens when you run with just the 512MB DIMM? The 1GB DIMM could > just be defective. > > [Also, if you want dual-channel, you have to two identical DIMMs] Socket 754 doesn't do dual channel so that should matter. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
Anders Helmersson wrote: > I have tried powernowd on my A8V Deluxe with an AMD64 3200+ (Winchester > core). When it runs at 1000MHz the core voltage is set to 1.1V, which I > suspect is too low for running stably. Works fine here, with a 4400. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 18:06:39 -0300, Peter Cordes wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:07:35AM -0500, David Wood wrote: > > Has anyone else noticed instability when using cpufreq modules? > > > > I have a pretty stable system, but I get OOPSes within a few hours > > or days of using cpufreq_ondemand, and I've had a few crashes I was > > pretty sure were related to cpufreq_userspace/powernowd. > I've found that my machine is a lot less stable when running at lower > than max speed. Not just stuff crashing, but memtest (from sysutils, > or memtester; just mlock()s some memory to test, not like > memtest86+). memtest finds errors when the CPU is slowed down. > There might be other correlated factors, like disk access. To change > speed, I've just used cpufreq-set -u 2000MHz (or 1800MHz, or > 1000MHz). Max speed is 2200MHz. (Newcastle core: from dmidecode: > ID: C0 0F 00 00 FF FB 8B 07 Signature: Extended Family 0, Model C, > Stepping 0) I have tried powernowd on my A8V Deluxe with an AMD64 3200+ (Winchester core). When it runs at 1000MHz the core voltage is set to 1.1V, which I suspect is too low for running stably. Maybe the motherboard gives a too low voltage or the 1.1V is simply to low for my processor. By manually setting the vcore in the bios I can run at 1.3V at 2000MHz without any noticeable problems. The nominal value is 1.4 at 2000MHz, 1.35 at 1800MHz, and 1.1V at 1000MHz. I haven't found any way to adjust these vcore settings, when running in Cool'n'Quiet mode. I need to add that I have replaced the boxed fan (the mb handbook states that QnQ only works with the boxed fan and heatsink). I am controlling the CPU and chassis fan with the fancontrol script in the lm-sensors package. Anders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
Peter Cordes wrote: > Even when running at 2.2GHz (full > speed) with only one stick of RAM (1024MB OCZ), it sometimes shows a cluster > of memory errors in memtest. It doesn't seem significantly different from > with both sticks of RAM, the other being a 512MB Infineon, IIRC. All DDR400. What happens when you run with just the 512MB DIMM? The 1GB DIMM could just be defective. [Also, if you want dual-channel, you have to two identical DIMMs] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:07:35AM -0500, David Wood wrote: > Has anyone else noticed instability when using cpufreq modules? > > I have a pretty stable system, but I get OOPSes within a few hours or days > of using cpufreq_ondemand, and I've had a few crashes I was pretty sure > were related to cpufreq_userspace/powernowd. I'd been ignoring my Debian inbox for a long time until today... I have an Asus K8V (basic) with an Athlon64 3200+ (newcastle core) 1.5GB of RAM, two IDE disks, two SATA disks, and an ATI AIW Radeon 7200 (but I don't use the TV in/out features). I run x86 2.6.12.6. I'll eventually switch to AMD64 software when I know my hardware is stable with x86, so I can usefully make bug reports on crashing software... BTW, the K8V is a nice piece of hardware; the AD1980 sound hardware supports mixing PCM streams in hardware (or at least the driver does?), so I can have xmms, xine, and whatever other program all not interfering with each other. (except when something is doing 4 channel output). I couldn't decide between an Abit (I think) with a K8T800Pro chipset and my Asus with just K8T800, but I eventually chose the Asus because it had Analog Devices sound instead of Realtek. I was pleasantly surprised that the sound really was good on it, esp. with the multiple opens of the sound dev :) I've found that my machine is a lot less stable when running at lower than max speed. Not just stuff crashing, but memtest (from sysutils, or memtester; just mlock()s some memory to test, not like memtest86+). memtest finds errors when the CPU is slowed down. There might be other correlated factors, like disk access. To change speed, I've just used cpufreq-set -u 2000MHz (or 1800MHz, or 1000MHz). Max speed is 2200MHz. (Newcastle core: from dmidecode: ID: C0 0F 00 00 FF FB 8B 07 Signature: Extended Family 0, Model C, Stepping 0 ) Unfortunately, the machine isn't perfectly stable even at max speed. It never crashed before I upgraded the BIOS from 1.04 or something to 1.07, which was needed for cpufreq to work. Even when running at 2.2GHz (full speed) with only one stick of RAM (1024MB OCZ), it sometimes shows a cluster of memory errors in memtest. It doesn't seem significantly different from with both sticks of RAM, the other being a 512MB Infineon, IIRC. All DDR400. Run 129 completed in 357 seconds (0 tests showed errors). Run 130: Test 1: Stuck Address: Testing...Passed. Test 2: Random value: Setting...Testing... FAILURE: 0x7ffeebc8 != 0x7efeebc8 at offset 0x01ca67f0. Skipping to next test... Test 3:XOR comparison: Setting...Testing... FAILURE: 0x42ff4c7a != 0x43ff4c7a at offset 0x01ca67f0. Skipping to next test... Test 4:SUB comparison: Setting...Testing... FAILURE: 0x2707802e != 0x2807802e at offset 0x01ca67f0. Skipping to next test... Test 5:MUL comparison: Setting...Testing... FAILURE: 0x73c9b7ae != 0xb4c9b7ae at offset 0x01ca67f0. Skipping to next test... Test 6:DIV comparison: Setting...Testing... FAILURE: 0x != 0x0001 at offset 0x01ca67f0. Skipping to next test... Test 7: OR comparison: Setting...Testing... FAILURE: 0xb2dd75dc != 0xb2dd75dd at offset 0x01ca67f0. Skipping to next test... Test 8:AND comparison: Setting...Testing...Passed. Test 9: Sequential Increment: Setting...Testing...Passed. Test 10:Solid Bits: Testing...Passed. BIOS on all auto settings. no other runs showed errors (140 runs) (Running at lower CPU speeds, errors were much more frequent). Interesting that all the errors are clustered in time and space at one memory location... As I said, the software running is Debian i386 sid with Linux 2.6.12.6, compiled with gcc 4.0.2 20050816 (from sid). Does anyone have any ideas? I hate hardware I can't trust! What's the point of digital logic if it makes mistakes! So does anyone have any experience or advice? -- #define X(x,y) x##y Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , des.ca) "The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish the hours! Confound him, too, who in this place set up a sundial, to cut and hack my day so wretchedly into small pieces!" -- Plautus, 200 BC signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
Le 27.01.2005 14:26:40, Stephan Seitz a écrit : On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:58:18PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: When using cool and quiet, the CPU frequecy and the VCORE voltage are changed according to data you can find in: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq Hm, so I don't need the powernowd, because Cool'n'Quiet does the same job? Without Cool'n quiet enables, the directory is not populated (you don't get the available frequencies and vcore settings) Without powernowd-k8, you cannot use the functionnality neither Shade and sweet water! Stephan Jean-Luc pgpHQN53oxqzI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:58:18PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: When using cool and quiet, the CPU frequecy and the VCORE voltage are changed according to data you can find in: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq Hm, so I don't need the powernowd, because Cool'n'Quiet does the same job? Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | WWW: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/| | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
David Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone else noticed instability when using cpufreq modules? My x-server crashed every now and then. Not reproducible but only with cpufreq ondemand enabled. I have these kernel-options enabled: CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=y -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
I've noticed my AMD64 boxes be particularly sensitive to the ondemand cpufreq daemon, causing locks and other fun. As soon as I fell back to the good old userspace daemons, all my problems went away. I'm not sure if AMD64 likes the freq to be adjusted as fast as ondemand does. later, Steve David Wood wrote: Has anyone else noticed instability when using cpufreq modules? I have a pretty stable system, but I get OOPSes within a few hours or days of using cpufreq_ondemand, and I've had a few crashes I was pretty sure were related to cpufreq_userspace/powernowd. On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: Le 26.01.2005 14:33:03, Stephan Seitz a ïcritï: Hi! Does anybody has the Asus K8N mainboard? I like to configure my sensors.conf for this board. For now, the output is (default sensors.conf): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sensors it8712-isa-0d00 Adapter: ISA adapter VCore 1: +1.50 V (min = +1.42 V, max = +1.57 V) ALARM VCore 2: +4.08 V (min = +2.40 V, max = +2.61 V) ALARM +3.3V: +6.43 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.46 V) ALARM +5V: +5.00 V (min = +4.76 V, max = +5.24 V) +12V: +11.78 V (min = +11.39 V, max = +12.61 V) -12V: +3.93 V (min = -12.63 V, max = -11.41 V) ALARM -5V: +4.03 V (min = -5.26 V, max = -4.77 V) ALARM Stdby: +6.85 V (min = +4.76 V, max = +5.24 V) ALARM VBat: +4.08 V fan1: 1506 RPM (min =0 RPM, div = 128) fan3: 1147 RPM (min = 664 RPM, div = 8) M/B Temp:+47ïC (low = +15ïC, high = +40ïC) sensor = thermistor CPU Temp:+35ïC (low = +15ïC, high = +45ïC) sensor = thermistor vid: +1.52 V I disabled fan2 because it is not used. Has anybody a working sensors.conf for this mainboard? I've not this board but an ASUS A8V so I cannot answer the previous questions. How do the values change if I'm using Cool'n'Quiet? I'm running powernowd which changes the CPU frequency. Does this conflict with Cool'n'Quiet? When using cool and quiet, the CPU frequecy and the VCORE voltage are changed according to data you can find in: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq You have the running frequency as well as the max, and available frequencies. You can use fancontrol to adjust the fan speed as a function of the CPU temperature. With the lm-sensors package are shipped pwmconfig to setup a configuration file for the fancontrol program which is also part of this package. Debian Pure64, kernel 2.6.11-rc1 Vanilla. Shade and sweet water! Stephan Regarsd Jean-Luc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
Has anyone else noticed instability when using cpufreq modules? I have a pretty stable system, but I get OOPSes within a few hours or days of using cpufreq_ondemand, and I've had a few crashes I was pretty sure were related to cpufreq_userspace/powernowd. On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: Le 26.01.2005 14:33:03, Stephan Seitz a écrit : Hi! Does anybody has the Asus K8N mainboard? I like to configure my sensors.conf for this board. For now, the output is (default sensors.conf): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sensors it8712-isa-0d00 Adapter: ISA adapter VCore 1: +1.50 V (min = +1.42 V, max = +1.57 V) ALARM VCore 2: +4.08 V (min = +2.40 V, max = +2.61 V) ALARM +3.3V: +6.43 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.46 V) ALARM +5V: +5.00 V (min = +4.76 V, max = +5.24 V) +12V: +11.78 V (min = +11.39 V, max = +12.61 V) -12V: +3.93 V (min = -12.63 V, max = -11.41 V) ALARM -5V: +4.03 V (min = -5.26 V, max = -4.77 V) ALARM Stdby: +6.85 V (min = +4.76 V, max = +5.24 V) ALARM VBat: +4.08 V fan1: 1506 RPM (min =0 RPM, div = 128) fan3: 1147 RPM (min = 664 RPM, div = 8) M/B Temp:+47°C (low = +15°C, high = +40°C) sensor = thermistor CPU Temp:+35°C (low = +15°C, high = +45°C) sensor = thermistor vid: +1.52 V I disabled fan2 because it is not used. Has anybody a working sensors.conf for this mainboard? I've not this board but an ASUS A8V so I cannot answer the previous questions. How do the values change if I'm using Cool'n'Quiet? I'm running powernowd which changes the CPU frequency. Does this conflict with Cool'n'Quiet? When using cool and quiet, the CPU frequecy and the VCORE voltage are changed according to data you can find in: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq You have the running frequency as well as the max, and available frequencies. You can use fancontrol to adjust the fan speed as a function of the CPU temperature. With the lm-sensors package are shipped pwmconfig to setup a configuration file for the fancontrol program which is also part of this package. Debian Pure64, kernel 2.6.11-rc1 Vanilla. Shade and sweet water! Stephan Regarsd Jean-Luc
Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf
Le 26.01.2005 14:33:03, Stephan Seitz a écrit : Hi! Does anybody has the Asus K8N mainboard? I like to configure my sensors.conf for this board. For now, the output is (default sensors.conf): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sensors it8712-isa-0d00 Adapter: ISA adapter VCore 1: +1.50 V (min = +1.42 V, max = +1.57 V) ALARM VCore 2: +4.08 V (min = +2.40 V, max = +2.61 V) ALARM +3.3V: +6.43 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.46 V) ALARM +5V: +5.00 V (min = +4.76 V, max = +5.24 V) +12V: +11.78 V (min = +11.39 V, max = +12.61 V) -12V: +3.93 V (min = -12.63 V, max = -11.41 V) ALARM -5V: +4.03 V (min = -5.26 V, max = -4.77 V) ALARM Stdby: +6.85 V (min = +4.76 V, max = +5.24 V) ALARM VBat: +4.08 V fan1: 1506 RPM (min =0 RPM, div = 128) fan3: 1147 RPM (min = 664 RPM, div = 8) M/B Temp:+47°C (low = +15°C, high = +40°C) sensor = thermistor CPU Temp:+35°C (low = +15°C, high = +45°C) sensor = thermistor vid: +1.52 V I disabled fan2 because it is not used. Has anybody a working sensors.conf for this mainboard? I've not this board but an ASUS A8V so I cannot answer the previous questions. How do the values change if I'm using Cool'n'Quiet? I'm running powernowd which changes the CPU frequency. Does this conflict with Cool'n'Quiet? When using cool and quiet, the CPU frequecy and the VCORE voltage are changed according to data you can find in: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq You have the running frequency as well as the max, and available frequencies. You can use fancontrol to adjust the fan speed as a function of the CPU temperature. With the lm-sensors package are shipped pwmconfig to setup a configuration file for the fancontrol program which is also part of this package. Debian Pure64, kernel 2.6.11-rc1 Vanilla. Shade and sweet water! Stephan Regarsd Jean-Luc pgp4yhRt5KVYg.pgp Description: PGP signature
