Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-21 Thread hendrik
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 04:10:03PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> 
> Those work just fine on amd64.  I use OpenJDK 6 all the time, and while
> I don't use emacs, I'm quite certain I'd have heard if it didn't work.

I use emacs regularly on an AMD64 Debian Lenny.  It works.

-- hendrik


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100722002636.ga31...@topoi.pooq.com



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-20 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:25:34PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Note that the i386 arch has 64-bit kernels.  You get a larger  
> per-process memory space and more efficient use of .GT. 4GB RAM.

Certainly (I run some servers that way).  But still no more than 3GB
per process when running 32bit applications.

Also the application doesn't get to take advantage of the extra registers
(but the kernel does).

Certainly the 64bit kernel is the right choice on hardware that can
run it.  Whether you use 32 or 64bit for user space is a different matter.

-- 
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100720174721.gg2...@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-20 Thread Ron Johnson

On 07/19/2010 09:44 AM, Siddharth Ravikumar wrote:

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Lennart Sorensen
  wrote:



If you want to use more than 3GB ram efficiently, or get the most out
of your system, use 64bit.  For a bit less hassles, use 32bit.


I am actually quiet happy with 32bit , but it looks like the future is
going to be 64bit. So if I build my comp this year , I will be using
it for the next 3 - 4 years or so . I am under a confusion whether to
go for 32bit or 64bit.



Note that the i386 arch has 64-bit kernels.  You get a larger 
per-process memory space and more efficient use of .GT. 4GB RAM.


--
Seek truth from facts.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c45dc0e.8070...@cox.net



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-20 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 05:15:47PM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> Amd64 is also about more general purposes registers in addition to bigger 
> numbers.
> 
> Generally speaking anything will benefit from more registers, and if a 
> problem uses the larger int's (or uses a large number library which uses 
> them) you will experience enormous performance gains.
> 
> More addressable memory helps as well.
> 
> There is 64bit flash bit adobe dropped it. It can be found if you are happy 
> with the known security problems.
> 
> 8 years of amd64 and counting. I've even asked our redhat rep when 32bit i686 
> will be dropped (not any time soon, gar!)

i386 has no problem doing 64bit intergers and 64 (and even 80) bit
floating point.  The difference is in the size of pointers.  amd64 has
64bit pointers so each application can use more memory, and it has
more general purpose registers (as you said) which helps the compiler
optimize better, and it uses SSE for floating point (not x87) which is
much faster and more efficient (but drops support for 80 bit floating
point, not that anyone cares).

Of course the fact you can optimize for amd64 instruction set rather
than i486 also makes the compiler happier.

-- 
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100720143131.ge2...@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-20 Thread Mark Allums

On 7/20/2010 2:15 AM, Dean Hamstead wrote:


There is 64bit flash bit adobe dropped it.



It was always a alpha/beta status, never a release.  They have said that 
64-bit will return, but gave no indication about when or in what form.


My personal guess is that there was only ever one guy working on it, and 
he's too busy.  But that is just speculation.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c4554ae.8080...@allums.com



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-20 Thread Dean Hamstead
Amd64 is also about more general purposes registers in addition to bigger 
numbers.

Generally speaking anything will benefit from more registers, and if a problem 
uses the larger int's (or uses a large number library which uses them) you will 
experience enormous performance gains.

More addressable memory helps as well.

There is 64bit flash bit adobe dropped it. It can be found if you are happy 
with the known security problems.

8 years of amd64 and counting. I've even asked our redhat rep when 32bit i686 
will be dropped (not any time soon, gar!)

Dean



On 20/07/2010, at 2:10 AM, "brian m. carlson"  
wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:07:47PM +0530, Siddharth Ravikumar wrote:
>> I don't use Flash and Skpype. I need emacs and Java OpenJDK 6 , these
>> are the two most important things . If  they are already ported to
>> amd64 . Then its good news .
> 
> Those work just fine on amd64.  I use OpenJDK 6 all the time, and while
> I don't use emacs, I'm quite certain I'd have heard if it didn't work.
> 
> According to [0], all Core i3 models support the amd64 architecture
> (which Intel calls Intel 64).  Personally, if you don't need proprietary
> 32-bit programs, I certainly encourage you to go with amd64: it can
> provide small general speed improvements overall as well as very
> significant ones in some applications.  32-bit programs can be run very
> easily on an amd64 Debian system if they only use libraries installed by
> the ia32-libs* packages.
> 
> [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_i3_microprocessors
> 
> -- 
> brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
> +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
> OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/93039f00-dd44-4761-86e2-9df879769...@fragfest.com.au



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-19 Thread Alexander Samad
[snip]
>> There's somewhat more software that runs on IA-32 than on x86_64.  The
>> sorts of things that people find missing on x86_64 are:
>>
>> - Adobe Flash
>
> Well at the moment 64bit flash is broken but it is possible to install
> and use.  Flash on linux is in general rather bad though.

i run amd64 debian, i use flash for some online games, my solution, I
installed ia32libs and installed seamonkey from their website into
/usr/local/lib as a 32 bit app and installed the 32bit flash player.

moral you can run 32 bit apps ontop of a 64 userland, with the right libraries.

Alex


[snip[


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilamzpxjof-ha7jtm8hfgwljijfw-p6ityi2...@mail.gmail.com



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-19 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:14:17PM +0530, Siddharth Ravikumar wrote:
> I am actually quiet happy with 32bit , but it looks like the future is
> going to be 64bit. So if I build my comp this year , I will be using
> it for the next 3 - 4 years or so . I am under a confusion whether to
> go for 32bit or 64bit.

Well personally I have 64bit on my laptop, my work desktop, and two out
of three desktops at home (one is an old athlon so it wasn't an option).

So I run 64bit if possible on the hardware.

If proprietary binaries are important to you, then you might want 32bit
instead.

-- 
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100719162604.gc2...@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-19 Thread brian m. carlson
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:07:47PM +0530, Siddharth Ravikumar wrote:
>  I don't use Flash and Skpype. I need emacs and Java OpenJDK 6 , these
> are the two most important things . If  they are already ported to
> amd64 . Then its good news .

Those work just fine on amd64.  I use OpenJDK 6 all the time, and while
I don't use emacs, I'm quite certain I'd have heard if it didn't work.

According to [0], all Core i3 models support the amd64 architecture
(which Intel calls Intel 64).  Personally, if you don't need proprietary
32-bit programs, I certainly encourage you to go with amd64: it can
provide small general speed improvements overall as well as very
significant ones in some applications.  32-bit programs can be run very
easily on an amd64 Debian system if they only use libraries installed by
the ia32-libs* packages.

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_i3_microprocessors

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-19 Thread Siddharth Ravikumar
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Lennart Sorensen
 wrote:


> If you want to use more than 3GB ram efficiently, or get the most out
> of your system, use 64bit.  For a bit less hassles, use 32bit.

I am actually quiet happy with 32bit , but it looks like the future is
going to be 64bit. So if I build my comp this year , I will be using
it for the next 3 - 4 years or so . I am under a confusion whether to
go for 32bit or 64bit.

-- 
http://www.fsf.org/
http://www.gnu.org/
http://en.windows7sins.org/
R.Siddharth


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikmetr_sixgxtsx-mheuy3-nm3gobebko4c7...@mail.gmail.com



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-19 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:28:57AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Siddharth Ravikumar
>  wrote:
> > I am planning to build my own computer . I have choosen to use intel
> > i3 as my processor , I just want to know whether debian amd64 will be
> > the right debian port If am to use intel i3 ? .
> >
> > i have not yet bought the processor , so I would like to know whether
> > 32-bit processor or 64-bit processor is recommended given the fact
> > that I use only GNU/Linux based operating system .
> 
> There's somewhat more software that runs on IA-32 than on x86_64.  The
> sorts of things that people find missing on x86_64 are:
> 
> - Adobe Flash

Well at the moment 64bit flash is broken but it is possible to install
and use.  Flash on linux is in general rather bad though.

> - Possibly Skype
> - Third party things provided in binary form (e.g. - no sources)
> 
> If you care about those sorts of applications a lot, then that should
> certainly influence your decision, probably towards 32 bit.
> 
> If not, then there's still often not *strong* reason to prefer 64 bit
> - it's not vastly superior on all kinds of workloads, though there are
> considerable advantages for applications that can really use a lot of
> memory.

If you want to use more than 3GB ram efficiently, or get the most out
of your system, use 64bit.  For a bit less hassles, use 32bit.

-- 
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100719143343.gb2...@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-19 Thread Siddharth Ravikumar
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Christopher Browne  wrote:
>> i have not yet bought the processor , so I would like to know whether
>> 32-bit processor or 64-bit processor is recommended given the fact
>> that I use only GNU/Linux based operating system .
>
> There's somewhat more software that runs on IA-32 than on x86_64.  The
> sorts of things that people find missing on x86_64 are:
>
> - Adobe Flash
> - Possibly Skype
> - Third party things provided in binary form (e.g. - no sources)
>
> If you care about those sorts of applications a lot, then that should
> certainly influence your decision, probably towards 32 bit.
>
> If not, then there's still often not *strong* reason to prefer 64 bit
> - it's not vastly superior on all kinds of workloads, though there are
> considerable advantages for applications that can really use a lot of
> memory.
 I don't use Flash and Skpype. I need emacs and Java OpenJDK 6 , these
are the two most important things . If  they are already ported to
amd64 . Then its good news .


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinoyakrl67nybf-iy12stedfkwlyjpyr-qt2...@mail.gmail.com



Re: intel i3 processor

2010-07-19 Thread Christopher Browne
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Siddharth Ravikumar
 wrote:
> I am planning to build my own computer . I have choosen to use intel
> i3 as my processor , I just want to know whether debian amd64 will be
> the right debian port If am to use intel i3 ? .
>
> i have not yet bought the processor , so I would like to know whether
> 32-bit processor or 64-bit processor is recommended given the fact
> that I use only GNU/Linux based operating system .

There's somewhat more software that runs on IA-32 than on x86_64.  The
sorts of things that people find missing on x86_64 are:

- Adobe Flash
- Possibly Skype
- Third party things provided in binary form (e.g. - no sources)

If you care about those sorts of applications a lot, then that should
certainly influence your decision, probably towards 32 bit.

If not, then there's still often not *strong* reason to prefer 64 bit
- it's not vastly superior on all kinds of workloads, though there are
considerable advantages for applications that can really use a lot of
memory.


-- 
http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikda-elii6ewqm4hrraty_eap8_hted4psbm...@mail.gmail.com



intel i3 processor

2010-07-19 Thread Siddharth Ravikumar
I am planning to build my own computer . I have choosen to use intel
i3 as my processor , I just want to know whether debian amd64 will be
the right debian port If am to use intel i3 ? .

i have not yet bought the processor , so I would like to know whether
32-bit processor or 64-bit processor is recommended given the fact
that I use only GNU/Linux based operating system .

Thanks for your help !

-- 
http://www.fsf.org/
http://www.gnu.org/
http://en.windows7sins.org/
R.Siddharth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilfahxxvhsqosokssblsaeltpiaqku0zhrtm...@mail.gmail.com