Re: encrypting or password protecting files in OpenOffice and also jpg files and sending them to MSWindows users.....

2009-11-30 Thread Adam Stiles
On Friday 27 Nov 2009, Michael Fothergill wrote:
 Dear Debian folks,

 I use Open Office.  It works OK for me most of the time.  It can save files
 as Microsoft Word documents.  I work with people who use MSWindows software
 all the time such as MSWord etc.  I want to send an encrypted or password
 protected file to them.

 If you produce a word processor document in MSWord apparently according
 them you just click on some menu item with encypt on it and it encrypts the
 document for you.  Whether it attaches a password to it as well or how the
 user at the other end decrypts it I don't know

Password-protected Office and ZIP files are so trivial to crack, that you 
might just as well be sending them in the clear.

I'd use GnuPG to encrypt the e-mail message .  unless I was sending it 
over a secure intranet with no outside world access  (mailserver behind NAT, 
on an unroutable address and with no ports -- especially not 25 and 110 -- 
forwarded to the outside world).  In which case, there's no need for 
encryption anyway.

-- 
AJS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: encrypting or password protecting files in OpenOffice and also jpg files and sending them to MSWindows users.....

2009-11-28 Thread Jonas Bardino
Michael Fothergill wrote:
 Dear Debian folks,
 
 I use Open Office.  It works OK for me most of the time.  It can save
 files as Microsoft Word documents.  I work with people who use MSWindows
 software all the time such as MSWord etc.  I want to send an encrypted
 or password protected file to them.
 
 If you produce a word processor document in MSWord apparently according
 them you just click on some menu item with encypt on it and it encrypts
 the document for you.  Whether it attaches a password to it as well or
 how the user at the other end decrypts it I don't know
 
 But with OpenOffice it doesn't look like there is an encryption function
 on it like there is in MSWord but there is a password protection option
 when you save a file in it.  If you look on google for Openoffice stuff
 on encryption on there it all reads like a chapter from Finnegan's Wake
 by James Joyce or even that it has itself been partly encrypted.  If
 you want to password protect or encrypt some files reasonably
 competently and then send them in a format the MSWindows world would
 decrypt relatively easily what would you do?
 
 Do I have to use other software like GnuPGP or whatever it is
 conjunction with Open Office?  Maybe I should just copy the files on to
 CD and then send them by old fashioned snail mail.  That really would
 confuse the hackers.
 
 Suggestions welcome,
 
 Michael Fothergill

Hi Michael

This question probably really belongs on debian-user@
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/) as it is not amd64 specific, but
anyway...

Apparently saving in MS format with password is available or under way
in OOo 3.x:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/162057
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39527
so upgrading may eventually be a solution.

Another option is to send a password protected zip file with the
document (e.g.
http://kagashe.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-password-protect-file-on-linux.html).
Zip extraction should be supported out of the box on windows. This is
probably as insecure as password protecting the document.

Most common email clients support encryption natively or with an add-on,
so that you can also go a step further and encrypt the entire
communication. Of course this requires some preparation from the
participants, unless they already posses encryption keys. However, once
set up it gives you strong encryption for all communication and all file
types.
In some countries signed encryption keys (sometimes called Digital
Signatures) are handed out to all citizens for authenticated and secure
communication with e.g. governmental bodies. In that case it is easy to
just reuse those. Please check Google results for 'gpg YOUR MAIL CLIENT'
and 'pgp/gpg RECIPIENT MAIL CLIENT' for details.

Cheers, Jonas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: encrypting or password protecting files in OpenOffice and also jpg files and sending them to MSWindows users.....

2009-11-28 Thread C M Reinehr
On Sat 28 November 2009 05:36:29 am Jonas Bardino wrote:
 Michael Fothergill wrote:
  Dear Debian folks,
 
  I use Open Office.  It works OK for me most of the time.  It can save
  files as Microsoft Word documents.  I work with people who use MSWindows
  software all the time such as MSWord etc.  I want to send an encrypted
  or password protected file to them.
 
  If you produce a word processor document in MSWord apparently according
  them you just click on some menu item with encypt on it and it encrypts
  the document for you.  Whether it attaches a password to it as well or
  how the user at the other end decrypts it I don't know
 
  But with OpenOffice it doesn't look like there is an encryption function
  on it like there is in MSWord but there is a password protection option
  when you save a file in it.  If you look on google for Openoffice stuff
  on encryption on there it all reads like a chapter from Finnegan's Wake
  by James Joyce or even that it has itself been partly encrypted.  If
  you want to password protect or encrypt some files reasonably
  competently and then send them in a format the MSWindows world would
  decrypt relatively easily what would you do?
 
  Do I have to use other software like GnuPGP or whatever it is
  conjunction with Open Office?  Maybe I should just copy the files on to
  CD and then send them by old fashioned snail mail.  That really would
  confuse the hackers.
 
  Suggestions welcome,
 
  Michael Fothergill

 Hi Michael

 This question probably really belongs on debian-user@
 (http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/) as it is not amd64 specific, but
 anyway...

 Apparently saving in MS format with password is available or under way
 in OOo 3.x:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/162057
 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39527
 so upgrading may eventually be a solution.

Michael,

No, that doesn't seem to be an option: Only documents using the 
OpenOffice.org XML-based format can be saved with a password. The option box 
grays out when you select MS.DOC format (or even .XML).

cmr

 Another option is to send a password protected zip file with the
 document (e.g.
 http://kagashe.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-password-protect-file-on-linux.h
tml). Zip extraction should be supported out of the box on windows. This is
 probably as insecure as password protecting the document.

 Most common email clients support encryption natively or with an add-on,
 so that you can also go a step further and encrypt the entire
 communication. Of course this requires some preparation from the
 participants, unless they already posses encryption keys. However, once
 set up it gives you strong encryption for all communication and all file
 types.
 In some countries signed encryption keys (sometimes called Digital
 Signatures) are handed out to all citizens for authenticated and secure
 communication with e.g. governmental bodies. In that case it is easy to
 just reuse those. Please check Google results for 'gpg YOUR MAIL CLIENT'
 and 'pgp/gpg RECIPIENT MAIL CLIENT' for details.

 Cheers, Jonas



-- 
Debian 'Etch' - Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



encrypting or password protecting files in OpenOffice and also jpg files and sending them to MSWindows users.....

2009-11-27 Thread Michael Fothergill
Dear Debian folks,

I use Open Office.  It works OK for me most of the time.  It can save files
as Microsoft Word documents.  I work with people who use MSWindows software
all the time such as MSWord etc.  I want to send an encrypted or password
protected file to them.

If you produce a word processor document in MSWord apparently according them
you just click on some menu item with encypt on it and it encrypts the
document for you.  Whether it attaches a password to it as well or how the
user at the other end decrypts it I don't know

But with OpenOffice it doesn't look like there is an encryption function on
it like there is in MSWord but there is a password protection option when
you save a file in it.  If you look on google for Openoffice stuff on
encryption on there it all reads like a chapter from Finnegan's Wake by
James Joyce or even that it has itself been partly encrypted.  If you
want to password protect or encrypt some files reasonably competently and
then send them in a format the MSWindows world would decrypt relatively
easily what would you do?

Do I have to use other software like GnuPGP or whatever it is conjunction
with Open Office?  Maybe I should just copy the files on to CD and then send
them by old fashioned snail mail.  That really would confuse the hackers.

Suggestions welcome,

Michael Fothergill


openoffice

2007-11-19 Thread Thibaud de Borggraef
Hello,

I have Lenny with the 2.6.23-8 kernel at home and have OpenOffice 2.2.1
installed on my system.
Today, I had to go home earlier than expected and so, I took some work
with me. I am working on a database under OObase at my work and I
thought I just have to send it to my home, open it and continue my work.
Now it seems that it is not working: OOo gets well open but after this
does not react any more. I read on some threads that it could be a
compatibility problem with the nvidia driver or just a bug in the 64bit
debian(lenny) version of OOo.
Any idea on how to solve this?

Thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread helices
I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
However, it is intermittent.

Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.

When I ssh into this box, the CLI works fine.  I restart gdm; and I kill
gdm; but, the frozen desktop video remains on the screen.

So far, when this happens, the only solution is a full system reboot.

What do you think?

-- 
Best Regards,

helices
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread Jochen Schulz
helices:

 Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
 the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
 menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.

Did you check /var/log/syslog and (IIRC) /var/log/xorg.0.log?

Another thing that comes to my mind: OOo has an option whether to use
OpenGL for some documents. I have never seen a document use OpenGL, but
turning this option off may help you.

J.
-- 
I am on the payroll of a company to whom I owe my undying gratitude.
[Agree]   [Disagree]
 http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
 I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
 However, it is intermittent.

 Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
 the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
 menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.

 When I ssh into this box, the CLI works fine.  I restart gdm; and I kill
 gdm; but, the frozen desktop video remains on the screen.

 So far, when this happens, the only solution is a full system reboot.

 What do you think?

Do you use nvidia drivers higher than 100.14.09 ? And did you activate 3D in 
OpenOfficeOrg settings ?

Regards

Hans


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread helices
* Jochen Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:17:30+0100] scribed:
 helices:
 
  Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
  the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
  menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
 
 Did you check /var/log/syslog

Around that last time, there is this:

kernel: npviewer.bin[4954]: segfault at f609e8d8 rip 
f609e8d8 rsp ffaa6bdc error 15


 and (IIRC) /var/log/xorg.0.log?

Also, at the end of Xorg.0.log.old, there are ~300 pairs of this:

SetGrabKeysState - disabled
SetGrabKeysState - enabled


 Another thing that comes to my mind: OOo has an option whether to use
 OpenGL for some documents. I have never seen a document use OpenGL, but
 turning this option off may help you.
 
 J.
 -- 
 I am on the payroll of a company to whom I owe my undying gratitude.
 [Agree]   [Disagree]
  http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html


-- 
Best Regards,

helices
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread helices
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100] scribed:
 Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
  I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
  However, it is intermittent.
 
  Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
  the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
  menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
 
  When I ssh into this box, the CLI works fine.  I restart gdm; and I kill
  gdm; but, the frozen desktop video remains on the screen.
 
  So far, when this happens, the only solution is a full system reboot.
 
  What do you think?
 
 Do you use nvidia drivers higher than 100.14.09 ? And did you activate 3D in 
 OpenOfficeOrg settings ?

Yes, it is nvidia.  I do not have graphical access right now.  How can I
check this via CLI?

-- 
Best Regards,

helices
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
 * Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100] 
scribed:
  Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
   I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
   However, it is intermittent.
  
   Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
   the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
   menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
  
   When I ssh into this box, the CLI works fine.  I restart gdm; and I
   kill gdm; but, the frozen desktop video remains on the screen.
  
   So far, when this happens, the only solution is a full system reboot.
  
   What do you think?
 
  Do you use nvidia drivers higher than 100.14.09 ? And did you activate 3D
  in OpenOfficeOrg settings ?

 Yes, it is nvidia.  I do not have graphical access right now.  How can I
 check this via CLI?

Do not know. Check out, which driver it is. If it is version higher than 
100.14.09, than downgrade to 100.14.09 (and xorg to 7.2). 

If the error is still sthere (what suppose will not be), you got the reason. 
If it is still  there, you can easily upgrade and the error is in OOO itself.

The setting of 3D is in OOO-Settings. I cannot tell, as I use the German 
version.

Look in OOO belowExtras  Settings  OpenOffice.org  View (this 
is Ansicht here)

Good luck

Hans




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread Jochen Schulz
helices:
 * Jochen Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:17:30+0100] scribed:
 helices:
 
 Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
 the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
 menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
 
 Did you check /var/log/syslog
 
 Around that last time, there is this:
 
 kernel: npviewer.bin[4954]: segfault at f609e8d8 rip 
 f609e8d8 rsp ffaa6bdc error 15

This appears to be related to nspluginwrapper and /may/ be the cause of
your X lockup.

 and (IIRC) /var/log/xorg.0.log?
 
 Also, at the end of Xorg.0.log.old, there are ~300 pairs of this:
 
 SetGrabKeysState - disabled
 SetGrabKeysState - enabled

Googling suggests these are a sign of a buggy video driver, but I don't
really know.

J.
-- 
I have been manipulated and permanently distorted.
[Agree]   [Disagree]
 http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread helices
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100] scribed:
 Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
  * Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100] 
 scribed:
   Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
However, it is intermittent.
   
Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
   
When I ssh into this box, the CLI works fine.  I restart gdm; and I
kill gdm; but, the frozen desktop video remains on the screen.
   
So far, when this happens, the only solution is a full system reboot.
   
What do you think?
  
   Do you use nvidia drivers higher than 100.14.09 ? And did you activate 3D
   in OpenOfficeOrg settings ?
 
  Yes, it is nvidia.  I do not have graphical access right now.  How can I
  check this via CLI?
 
 Do not know. Check out, which driver it is. If it is version higher than 
 100.14.09, than downgrade to 100.14.09 (and xorg to 7.2). 
snip /

OK.  I do NOT know which driver I am using.  Here is what xorg.conf says
about the video card:

nVidia Corporation NV41 [Quadro FX 3450/4000 SDI]

I did NOT install any special drivers.  Somehow, video just worked when
I installed etch.

How do I find out the answers to what you are asking?


-- 
Best Regards,

helices
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
 * Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100] 
scribed:
  Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
   * Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100]
 
  scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
 I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
 However, it is intermittent.

 Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on
 winders; the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no
 alt-tab; no menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.

 When I ssh into this box, the CLI works fine.  I restart gdm; and I
 kill gdm; but, the frozen desktop video remains on the screen.

 So far, when this happens, the only solution is a full system
 reboot.

 What do you think?
   
Do you use nvidia drivers higher than 100.14.09 ? And did you
activate 3D in OpenOfficeOrg settings ?
  
   Yes, it is nvidia.  I do not have graphical access right now.  How can
   I check this via CLI?
 
  Do not know. Check out, which driver it is. If it is version higher than
  100.14.09, than downgrade to 100.14.09 (and xorg to 7.2).

 snip /

 OK.  I do NOT know which driver I am using.  Here is what xorg.conf says
 about the video card:

 nVidia Corporation NV41 [Quadro FX 3450/4000 SDI]

 I did NOT install any special drivers.  Somehow, video just worked when
 I installed etch.

 How do I find out the answers to what you are asking?

Hmm, you could see it, if you start aptitude or synaptic. It will show you the 
installed version of the package. 

I suggest, to read the documentation about package handling, especially about 
apt and aptitude. Package handling is important in all linux, and in Debian, 
too. (that is my personal opinion).

Good luck

Hans


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread helices
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:20:23:52+0100] scribed:
 Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
  * Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100] 
 scribed:
   Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100]
  
   scribed:
 Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
  I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
  However, it is intermittent.
 
  Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on
  winders; the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no
  alt-tab; no menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
 
  When I ssh into this box, the CLI works fine.  I restart gdm; and I
  kill gdm; but, the frozen desktop video remains on the screen.
 
  So far, when this happens, the only solution is a full system
  reboot.
 
  What do you think?

 Do you use nvidia drivers higher than 100.14.09 ? And did you
 activate 3D in OpenOfficeOrg settings ?
   
Yes, it is nvidia.  I do not have graphical access right now.  How can
I check this via CLI?
  
   Do not know. Check out, which driver it is. If it is version higher than
   100.14.09, than downgrade to 100.14.09 (and xorg to 7.2).
 
  snip /
 
  OK.  I do NOT know which driver I am using.  Here is what xorg.conf says
  about the video card:
 
  nVidia Corporation NV41 [Quadro FX 3450/4000 SDI]
 
  I did NOT install any special drivers.  Somehow, video just worked when
  I installed etch.
 
  How do I find out the answers to what you are asking?
 
 Hmm, you could see it, if you start aptitude or synaptic. It will show you 
 the 
 installed version of the package. 
 
 I suggest, to read the documentation about package handling, especially about 
 apt and aptitude. Package handling is important in all linux, and in Debian, 
 too. (that is my personal opinion).

According to Xorg.0.log:
(II) LoadModule: nv
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nv_drv.so
(II) Module nv: vendor=X.Org Foundation

According to aptitude:
xserver-xorg-video-nv1:1.2.0-3

How does this relate to your suggested versions?

-- 
Best Regards,

helices
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
 * Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:20:23:52+0100] 
scribed:
  Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
   * Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100]
 
  scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
 * Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100]
   
scribed:
  Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
   I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic
   : However, it is intermittent.
  
   Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on
   winders; the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no
   alt-tab; no menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
  
   When I ssh into this box, the CLI works fine.  I restart gdm;
   and I kill gdm; but, the frozen desktop video remains on the
   screen.
  
   So far, when this happens, the only solution is a full system
   reboot.
  
   What do you think?
 
  Do you use nvidia drivers higher than 100.14.09 ? And did you
  activate 3D in OpenOfficeOrg settings ?

 Yes, it is nvidia.  I do not have graphical access right now.  How
 can I check this via CLI?
   
Do not know. Check out, which driver it is. If it is version higher
than 100.14.09, than downgrade to 100.14.09 (and xorg to 7.2).
  
   snip /
  
   OK.  I do NOT know which driver I am using.  Here is what xorg.conf
   says about the video card:
  
   nVidia Corporation NV41 [Quadro FX 3450/4000 SDI]
  
   I did NOT install any special drivers.  Somehow, video just worked when
   I installed etch.
  
   How do I find out the answers to what you are asking?
 
  Hmm, you could see it, if you start aptitude or synaptic. It will show
  you the installed version of the package.
 
  I suggest, to read the documentation about package handling, especially
  about apt and aptitude. Package handling is important in all linux, and
  in Debian, too. (that is my personal opinion).

 According to Xorg.0.log:
 (II) LoadModule: nv
 (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nv_drv.so
 (II) Module nv: vendor=X.Org Foundation

 According to aptitude:
 xserver-xorg-video-nv1:1.2.0-3

 How does this relate to your suggested versions?

No, I see, you have running no glx driver. The required driver in xorg.conf 
must be named nvidia.

So, you can forget my suggestions and ideas. You have no nvidia-glx driver 
installed.

If you might run with nvias accelerated drivers, you first should have good 
knowledge about package handling. 

Sorry, I could not help you.
 
Best regards

Hans

Hans


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: openoffice locks graphic video ???

2007-11-12 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Mon, 2007-11-12 10:04:54 -0600, helices [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
 However, it is intermittent.
 
 Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
 the desktop freezes.  The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
 menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
 
 When I ssh into this box, the CLI works fine.  I restart gdm; and I kill
 gdm; but, the frozen desktop video remains on the screen.
 
 So far, when this happens, the only solution is a full system reboot.

Just for the records, I've seen that, too, several times. Usually,
that happened when I pressed the Alt key to move the window around
(Windowmaker: Hit Alt and grab the window anywhere.) In these
situations, the menu's File part got blue, but the rest of the menu
didn't show up. Mouse movement was sssowww, and the mouse
pointer didn't leave the screen (dual-head configuration with
xinerama, drivers are s3virge and i810.)  Oh, and that wasn't on a
x86_64 system, but on a simple plain 3GHz Pentium 4.

Killing OOo alone didn't ever help, I needed to shutdown the X11
server and restart it (usually blindly, since I needed to kill -9 it.)

However, I haven't seen that during the last few weeks. Probably
there's a version of OOo in Debian unstable that fixes it, or at least
mostly.

MfG, JBG

-- 
  Jan-Benedict Glaw  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  +49-172-7608481
 Signature of:Don't believe in miracles: Rely on them!
 the second  :


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Re: Openoffice

2007-01-14 Thread Alex Samad
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 01:02:21AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
 Hi Tomek
   packages on my server if you are interested. But as before, there may be
   some unwanted stuff on my server.
  deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/
  
  /Gudjon
 
  Hi. I've just downloaded some ooo components from the link above and found
  out that there is a problem with dependienses - openoffice.org-common
  requires openoffice.org-style-default and vice versa
 
 You are right but what is the problem. Both files are on my server and it 
 installed flawlessly on my computer.
 
 /Gudjon
 
 
 
 hmm.. shouldn't it be considered as a bug? But I'm not an expert in .deb 
 packaging.
 It is possible to install those packages but you have to install one of them 
 w/o dependency checking (I installed downloaded .deb files with kpackage) or 
 you'll get an error and the package will not be 'configured' (what ever that 
 means) and the package is marked as broken (eg. after running Synaptic an 
 info message apears about the problem).
 I tried to add the given address to the list of repos thru Synaptic but 
 apt-get update couldnt find the package index so I had to download the files 
 and install them manually.
You should be able to install both of them at the same time if they are
dependant on each other !

 
 Dunno, but whatever - the new ooo works fine and thats what counts.
 Great thanx for the amd64 packages!
 
 Tomek
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice

2007-01-14 Thread tomek . fizyk
Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
Hi
   Please try to do 
dpkg -i (both packages)
That should fix it. I used dselect and I guess that saved me the problem. And 
please post it to the list if it works.

/Gudjon


Running
dpkg -i (both packages)
installed the packages w/o any problems

Tomek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice

2007-01-14 Thread vitko
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson píše v Čt 11. 01. 2007 v 19:14 +0100:

Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64? It 
 compiles perfectly and works nicely and you can get the debian packages on my 
 server if you are interested. But as before, there may be some unwanted stuff 
 on my server.
 deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/

Gudjon,

your packages work like a charm. Thanks a lot.

Vit


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice

2007-01-13 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
  it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
  release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1 in
  sid.
 Then I don't understand. On the following page
 http://packages.debian.org/experimental/editors/openoffice.org
 the only supported architecture is i386 and 

It's probably just not built for it.  Experimental is not a big priority
for autobuilding.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice

2007-01-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:54:25AM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
   it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
   release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1 in
   sid.
  Then I don't understand. On the following page
  http://packages.debian.org/experimental/editors/openoffice.org
  the only supported architecture is i386 and 
 
 It's probably just not built for it.  Experimental is not a big priority
 for autobuilding.

The problem seems to be that it's not actually listed as needing to
build, I'm looking into it.


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice

2007-01-13 Thread tomek . fizyk
Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
Hi
   Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64? It 
compiles perfectly and works nicely and you can get the debian packages on my 
server if you are interested. But as before, there may be some unwanted stuff 
on my server.
deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/

/Gudjon



Hi. I've just downloaded some ooo components from the link above and found out 
that there is a problem with dependienses - openoffice.org-common requires 
openoffice.org-style-default and vice versa

Tomek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice

2007-01-13 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Hi Tomek
  packages on my server if you are interested. But as before, there may be
  some unwanted stuff on my server.
 deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/
 
 /Gudjon

 Hi. I've just downloaded some ooo components from the link above and found
 out that there is a problem with dependienses - openoffice.org-common
 requires openoffice.org-style-default and vice versa

You are right but what is the problem. Both files are on my server and it 
installed flawlessly on my computer.

/Gudjon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: Openoffice

2007-01-13 Thread tomek . fizyk
Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
Hi Tomek
  packages on my server if you are interested. But as before, there may be
  some unwanted stuff on my server.
 deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/
 
 /Gudjon

 Hi. I've just downloaded some ooo components from the link above and found
 out that there is a problem with dependienses - openoffice.org-common
 requires openoffice.org-style-default and vice versa

You are right but what is the problem. Both files are on my server and it 
installed flawlessly on my computer.

/Gudjon



hmm.. shouldn't it be considered as a bug? But I'm not an expert in .deb 
packaging.
It is possible to install those packages but you have to install one of them 
w/o dependency checking (I installed downloaded .deb files with kpackage) or 
you'll get an error and the package will not be 'configured' (what ever that 
means) and the package is marked as broken (eg. after running Synaptic an info 
message apears about the problem).
I tried to add the given address to the list of repos thru Synaptic but apt-get 
update couldnt find the package index so I had to download the files and 
install them manually.

Dunno, but whatever - the new ooo works fine and thats what counts.
Great thanx for the amd64 packages!

Tomek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Openoffice

2007-01-11 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Hi
   Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64? It 
compiles perfectly and works nicely and you can get the debian packages on my 
server if you are interested. But as before, there may be some unwanted stuff 
on my server.
deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/

/Gudjon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice

2007-01-11 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dijous 11 Gener 2007 19:14, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson va escriure:
 Hi
Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64?
it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to 
release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1 in 
sid.

 It compiles perfectly and works nicely and you can get the debian packages
 on my server if you are interested. But as before, there may be some
 unwanted stuff on my server.
 deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/

ok, thank's. Have you think about not repeat packages that are in 
experimental?

Regards,

Leo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice

2007-01-11 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Hi
   Thanks for the answer.
 Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for
  amd64?

 it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
 release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1 in
 sid.
Then I don't understand. On the following page
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/editors/openoffice.org
the only supported architecture is i386 and 
$apt-cache policy openoffice.org gives the output
openoffice.org:
  Installed: 2.1-1
  Candidate: 2.1-1
  Version table:
 *** 2.1-1 0
500 http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se amd64/ Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2.0.4.dfsg.2-3 0
500 http://ftp.se.debian.org unstable/main Packages
 2.0.4.dfsg.2-2 0
500 http://ftp.se.debian.org testing/main Packages
in my /etc/apt/sources.list there is 
deb-src http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free

Version 2.1 was available for i386 before christmas
 ok, thank's. Have you think about not repeat packages that are in
 experimental?
I always remove the packages from my server as soon as they reach the official 
distribution.

/Gudjon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice

2007-01-11 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dijous 11 Gener 2007 19:52, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson va escriure:
 Hi
Thanks for the answer.

  Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for
   amd64?
 
  it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
  release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1
  in sid.

 Then I don't understand. On the following page
 http://packages.debian.org/experimental/editors/openoffice.org
 the only supported architecture is i386 and

ok, I don't understand too :-(

 $apt-cache policy openoffice.org gives the output
 openoffice.org:
   Installed: 2.1-1
   Candidate: 2.1-1
   Version table:
  *** 2.1-1 0
 500 http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se amd64/ Packages
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  2.0.4.dfsg.2-3 0
 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org unstable/main Packages
  2.0.4.dfsg.2-2 0
 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org testing/main Packages
 in my /etc/apt/sources.list there is
 deb-src http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free

 Version 2.1 was available for i386 before christmas

yes, but etch was frozen before :-(

  ok, thank's. Have you think about not repeat packages that are in
  experimental?

 I always remove the packages from my server as soon as they reach the
 official distribution.

Ok, I understand. Otherwise thank's for offer your packages :-)

Best regards,

Leo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice upppss

2007-01-11 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dijous 11 Gener 2007 19:52, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson va escriure:
 Hi
Thanks for the answer.

  Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for
   amd64?
 
  it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
  release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1
  in sid.


uppps

maybe there are not in experimental. I have understood looking on the web page 
that yes, but there's no package for amd64. You are right Gudjon

I'm sorry,

Leo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: openoffice 2.0.4, rc3

2006-10-05 Thread Manolo Díaz
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
 Hi
The newest version of openoffice more or less works. I have a doc file 
 (unfortunately confidential) that I have always tried to open and openoffice 
 for amd64 has always crashed on. Now I could open it. Two figure, a little 
 bit of text and an excel table is missing but the rest is there. If the file 
 is opened in the 32 bit version and saved as a odt file everything works 
 perfectly.
I claim that it is more or less usable now so please try it out.
 
 Regards
 Gudjon
 
 

I agree. Only eleven days ago I filed a bug against openoffice.org-impress
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=389138). Now it's fixed. It
seems they are working hard on it and that Etch amd64 dist will be released
fully functional. :-)

Regards,
Manolo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: openoffice 2.0.4, rc3

2006-10-05 Thread Scott Thomas
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 6:00 pm, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
 Hi
The newest version of openoffice more or less works. I have a doc file
 (unfortunately confidential) that I have always tried to open and
 openoffice for amd64 has always crashed on. Now I could open it. Two
 figure, a little bit of text and an excel table is missing but the rest is
 there. If the file is opened in the 32 bit version and saved as a odt file
 everything works perfectly.
I claim that it is more or less usable now so please try it out.

 Regards
 Gudjon

I've tried installing via apt-get, but get a problem with required python 
version being higher than allowed by my hplj printer driver or by python-qt3 
(both require python 2.4 but openoffice.org causes installation of python 
2.4.3-11.

Is there a way to resolve this? 

Thanks!

Scott


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: openoffice 2.0.4, rc3

2006-10-05 Thread Ernest jw ter Kuile

On Thursday 05 October 2006 21:16, Scott Thomas wrote:
 I've tried installing via apt-get, but get a problem with required python 
 version being higher than allowed by my hplj printer driver or by python-qt3 
 (both require python 2.4 but openoffice.org causes installation of python 
 2.4.3-11.


I don't know about your hplj printer drivers, but I have a python-qt3 from 
testing 
here that seem be content with the current python 2.4.x.
Depend says: 2.5 and = 2.3 

I must admit I don't use python-qt3 though.

Ernest ter Kuile


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: openoffice 2.0.4, rc3

2006-10-05 Thread Scott Thomas
On Thursday 05 October 2006 5:29 pm, Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote:
 I don't know about your hplj printer drivers, but I have a python-qt3 from
 testing here that seem be content with the current python 2.4.x.
 Depend says: 2.5 and = 2.3


Thanks - that got me thinking that perhaps just an upgrade of the hp printer 
driver would do it. That caused a python upgrade, and now it is happily 
installing OOo.

Thanks for responding.

Scott


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



openoffice 2.0.4, rc3

2006-10-04 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Hi
   The newest version of openoffice more or less works. I have a doc file 
(unfortunately confidential) that I have always tried to open and openoffice 
for amd64 has always crashed on. Now I could open it. Two figure, a little 
bit of text and an excel table is missing but the rest is there. If the file 
is opened in the 32 bit version and saved as a odt file everything works 
perfectly.
   I claim that it is more or less usable now so please try it out.

Regards
Gudjon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-28 Thread P|pex

--- Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha
scritto: 

 P|pex wrote:
  I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't
 run...
  is't bug ?
 
 I guess more details would be welcome. :)


When I run oowriter the first time the following error
occurs

/home/gianluca/-writer doesn't exist

I close the windows and try to run it again. Now
oowriter run correctly.

any ideas?






___ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2006 21:56 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Your'e right. I meant if it is an official 64bit release from Sun 
 Microsystems.

Is not. SUn apparently doesn't care.

 If not then what is the chance that the bugfixes that make this release usable
 on 64bit systems will be adopted to the official release (read: does Sun
 use any code written by the community to develop their releases of OOO)?

Yes.

 As long as Sun does not patch their official code with the bugfixes the
 community will have to patch every new release of OOO to make it work
 on 64 bitsystems...

It constantly flows into the normal code again. Done by the community.

Regards,

Rene
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-27 Thread P|pex
I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
is't bug ?



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Poco spazio e tanto spam? Yahoo! Mail ti protegge dallo spam e ti da tanto 
spazio gratuito per i tuoi file e i messaggi 
http://mail.yahoo.it 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-27 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
P|pex wrote:
 I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
 is't bug ?

I guess more details would be welcome. :)

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-27 Thread Jan De Luyck
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 10:27, P|pex wrote:
 I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
 is't bug ?

What do you get if you run it from an xterm or so?

It works fine on my box...

Jan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-27 Thread tomek . fizyk
Is this AMD64 port of OOO in Sid an official one or is it made by the community?

Tomek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-27 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is this AMD64 port of OOO in Sid an official one or is it made by the 
 community?

It's an official one.

Look there:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=openoffice.orgsearchon=namessubword=1version=unstablerelease=all

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-27 Thread Giacomo Mulas

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:


It's an official one.

Look there:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=openoffice.orgsearchon=namessubword=1version=unstablerelease=all


I don't think the question was is it an official debian port, which it
clearly is. I suppose he meant is it an official 64bit port released by the 
OOo official site?. I don't know the answer to this latter one...


Bye
Giacomo

--
_

Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI
Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)

Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222
Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916
_

When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are
  (Freddy Mercury)
_

--
Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o
contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e'
risultato non infetto.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-27 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
 
 I don't think the question was is it an official debian port, which it
 clearly is. I suppose he meant is it an official 64bit port released by
 the OOo official site?. I don't know the answer to this latter one...

Hum I can't reach my own amd64 now but I can tell you how to check this.
Just do: file /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin

You will be told if your OpenOffice is chrooted in 32bits environement
or natively 64bits. :)

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-27 Thread Thierry Chatelet




Emmanuel Fleury wrote:

  Giacomo Mulas wrote:
  
  
I don't think the question was "is it an official debian port", which it
clearly is. I suppose he meant "is it an official 64bit port released by
the OOo official site?". I don't know the answer to this latter one...

  
  
Hum I can't reach my own amd64 now but I can tell you how to check this.
Just do: file /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin

You will be told if your OpenOffice is chrooted in 32bits environement
or natively 64bits. :)

Regards
  

Last week, I installed openoffice with no problem Now, on a ne w
install, I get he following:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 openoffice.org: Depends: openoffice.org-core (= 2.0.4~rc2-1) but it
is not going to be installed
 Depends: openoffice.org-writer but it is not going to
be installed
 Depends: openoffice.org-calc but it is not going to
be installed
 Depends: openoffice.org-impress but it is not going
to be installed
 Depends: openoffice.org-draw but it is not going to
be installed
 Depends: openoffice.org-math but it is not going to
be installed
 Depends: openoffice.org-base but it is not going to
be installed
E: Broken packages


pt-get install --yes 'openoffice.org-core' ;echo RESULT=$?
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 openoffice.org-core: Depends: libicu34 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
RESULT=100

So, some libraries seem to be missing. 





Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-27 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
 Giacomo Mulas wrote:
 I don't think the question was is it an official debian port, which it
 clearly is. I suppose he meant is it an official 64bit port released by
 the OOo official site?. I don't know the answer to this latter one...
 
 Hum I can't reach my own amd64 now but I can tell you how to check this.
 Just do: file /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin
 
 You will be told if your OpenOffice is chrooted in 32bits environement
 or natively 64bits. :)

Definitely native 64bits:

/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD
x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0, dynamically linked (uses
shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0, stripped

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-27 Thread tomek . fizyk
Użytkownik Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:

 It's an official one.

 Look there:
 http://packages.debian.org/...

I don't think the question was is it an official debian port, which it
clearly is. I suppose he meant is it an official 64bit port released by the 
OOo official site?. I don't know the answer to this latter one...

Bye
Giacomo


Your'e right. I meant if it is an official 64bit release from Sun Microsystems.
If not then what is the chance that the bugfixes that make this release usable
on 64bit systems will be adopted to the official release (read: does Sun
use any code written by the community to develop their releases of OOO)?

I haven't found any 64bit version of OOO on the official site, but thought
that doesn't have to mean that Sun has nothing to do with the release
announced here.

As long as Sun does not patch their official code with the bugfixes the
community will have to patch every new release of OOO to make it work
on 64 bitsystems...

So, will the Debian's port change the situation with the official OOO?

Tomek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Openoffice in Sid for amd64

2006-09-25 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
 Hi again
An hour after my emailing I found out that openoffice for amd64 had been 
 accepted into the unstable repository. You can read about it on
 http://openoffice.debian.net/
 so I removed my packages immediately.

This is really a great news ! :)

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Openoffice+kdenlive

2006-09-24 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Hi
   I have compiled openoffice 2.0.4 rc2 and it can be found on my server
deb http://mve035.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/amd64/ ./

Has anyone tried kdenlive on amd64. Shall I ask Marillat to add amd64 to the 
list of supported distributions? (don't know if he will) The 
option motion_est must be disabled.
   Does anyone know if this feature motion_est in the mlt libraries will 
ever work on amd64?

Anyway, kdenlive can as well be found on my server if you are interested.

Regards
Gudjon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: One more time, openoffice :)

2006-09-22 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
 Hi,
 
 there are experimental ubuntu amd64-native packages for OpenOffice
 according to [1]. Apart from that, a couple of days ago non-official
 packages (re-built from the debian unstable sources) were posted in this
 list, but I haven't had the time to test them quite a lot. In fact, I
 have a bug: the first time I start OpenOffice, it crashes, but the
 second time it works... ?¿

By now, you do not need to modify anymore the debian/rules file. The
amd64 architecture is compiling fine automatically and produce all the
needed packages.

But the software is still quite unstable and need to be tested and debugged.

 Anyway, anyone knows the state of the former and the latter, or the
 plans? Rene, are you alive? ;)

I guess now it's building fine and we need to fix all these pointers
problems (last time I ran it I was hitting a double free problem).

Just to recall the process to compile it:

First of all, few links about OpenOffice:
http://www.openoffice.org/
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Porting_to_x86-64_(AMD64,_EM64T)
http://openoffice.debian.net/
http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openoffice.org.html

Preparing to compile (to be done once):

1) Add the following line to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib

2) Update:
su -c 'apt-get update'

3) Get the packages needed to compile openoffice.org:
su -c 'apt-get build-dep -t experimental openoffice.org'

Note: The package boost-build is needed but might not be in the list
of the build-dep (install it by hand if needed)

Once you got all these done, we can get the source and compile it:

1) Get the source from the experimental Debian repository (getting the
sources from the experimental makes it sure to track bugs on the very
last version): apt-get source -t experimental openoffice.org

2) Move to the build directory: cd openoffice-*

3) Build the package (this might take quite a while):
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 261
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 69 34
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: One more time, openoffice :)

2006-09-22 Thread henk
On Thursday 21 September 2006 17:41, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
 Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
  Hi,
 
  there are experimental ubuntu amd64-native packages for OpenOffice
  according to [1]. Apart from that, a couple of days ago non-official
  packages (re-built from the debian unstable sources) were posted in this
  list, but I haven't had the time to test them quite a lot. In fact, I
  have a bug: the first time I start OpenOffice, it crashes, but the
  second time it works... ?¿

 By now, you do not need to modify anymore the debian/rules file. The
 amd64 architecture is compiling fine automatically and produce all the
 needed packages.

 But the software is still quite unstable and need to be tested and
 debugged.

  Anyway, anyone knows the state of the former and the latter, or the
  plans? Rene, are you alive? ;)

 I guess now it's building fine and we need to fix all these pointers
 problems (last time I ran it I was hitting a double free problem).

 Just to recall the process to compile it:

 First of all, few links about OpenOffice:
 http://www.openoffice.org/
 http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Porting_to_x86-64_(AMD64,_EM64T)
 http://openoffice.debian.net/
 http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openoffice.org.html

 Preparing to compile (to be done once):

 1) Add the following line to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
 deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib

 2) Update:
 su -c 'apt-get update'

 3) Get the packages needed to compile openoffice.org:
 su -c 'apt-get build-dep -t experimental openoffice.org'

 Note: The package boost-build is needed but might not be in the list
 of the build-dep (install it by hand if needed)

At this point i get:

c64:~# apt-get install -t experimental boost-build
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
boost-build is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11 not upgraded.
c64:~# apt-get build-dep -t experimental openoffice.org
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
E: Build-dependencies for openoffice.org could not be satisfied.

Any ideas?

Mzzl
Henk


 Once you got all these done, we can get the source and compile it:

 1) Get the source from the experimental Debian repository (getting the
 sources from the experimental makes it sure to track bugs on the very
 last version): apt-get source -t experimental openoffice.org

 2) Move to the build directory: cd openoffice-*

 3) Build the package (this might take quite a while):
 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc

 Regards
 --
 Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 261
 Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 69 34
 LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
 351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury



One more time, openoffice :)

2006-09-21 Thread Rafael Rodríguez
Hi,there are experimental ubuntu amd64-native packages for OpenOffice according to [1]. Apart from that, a couple of days ago non-official packages (re-built from the debian unstable sources) were posted in this list, but I haven't had the time to test them quite a lot. In fact, I have a bug: the first time I start OpenOffice, it crashes, but the second time it works... ?¿
Anyway, anyone knows the state of the former and the latter, or the plans? Rene, are you alive? ;)Greets,Rafael Rodríguez[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/199390/



Re: One more time, openoffice :)

2006-09-21 Thread Rafael Rodríguez

On 9/21/06, Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
1) Get the source from the experimental Debian repository (getting the
sources from the experimental makes it sure to track bugs on the very
last version): apt-get source -t experimental openoffice.org

2) Move to the build directory: cd openoffice-*

3) Build the package (this might take quite a while):
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc


Just a note to say that I think it's the same 'apt-get -b source -t
experimental openoffice.org' and it makes it easier (1 step instead of
those 3) ;)

Rafael Rodríguez



Re: OpenOffice in chroot -- fonts?

2006-08-30 Thread Helge Hafting

Andrew Robinson wrote:

Tried using xfs. I have more fonts now in open office, and the Andale
Mono is now available, but that didn't help

What is interesting, is that the fonts are correct in the actual
contant (in oocalc, the fonts in the cells are fine). It is only the
windowing fonts (menu bar, dialog text, etc.).

I'm wondering if it could be a gnome or kde config issue inside the 
chroot.


Where do the font settings come from in the chroot (KDE, gnome, xfce)?
Outside of the chroot I am running XFCE with KDE support enabled.

Well, you ran the software at a time when few fonts were available,
so perhaps it defaulted to hopeless but available fonts. 
Now it doesn't change

automatically just because you made better fonts available.
The document look changed because the app tries to load
correct document fonts each time you open a document.  And now
the fonts are there.

You will probably have to change the font settings for the app(s)
in question - I don't use gnome/kde so I don't know how.


Helge Hafting


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OpenOffice in chroot -- fonts?

2006-08-24 Thread Andrew Robinson

Tried using xfs. I have more fonts now in open office, and the Andale
Mono is now available, but that didn't help

What is interesting, is that the fonts are correct in the actual
contant (in oocalc, the fonts in the cells are fine). It is only the
windowing fonts (menu bar, dialog text, etc.).

I'm wondering if it could be a gnome or kde config issue inside the chroot.

Where do the font settings come from in the chroot (KDE, gnome, xfce)?
Outside of the chroot I am running XFCE with KDE support enabled.

Thanks,
Andrew

On 8/21/06, Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Andrew Robinson wrote:
 I managed to get openoffice to install fine in a ia32 chroot
 environment (from pages like [1]). It runs okay, but everything is
 extremely large. The fonts (menu bars, dialogs, etc.) are about 18pt
 font or so (buttons in the dialogs are huge).

 I'm not sure if this is a dpi, font or resolution problem. Would
 appreciate some advice. I'm starting to debate ditching amd64 for i386
 as much as I'd hate to to avoid all these problems (mplayer  codecs,
 flash in firefox, openoffice, wine, etc.).

Use a font server like xfs.  That way, the same fonts will be
available to 32-bit and 64-bit software.

Alternatively, install your font collection in the chroot too.

Helge Hafting




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OpenOffice in chroot -- fonts?

2006-08-24 Thread Matteo Vescovi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Andrew,

On 08/24/2006 09:20 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
 Tried using xfs. I have more fonts now in open office, and the Andale
 Mono is now available, but that didn't help
 
 What is interesting, is that the fonts are correct in the actual
 contant (in oocalc, the fonts in the cells are fine). It is only the
 windowing fonts (menu bar, dialog text, etc.).
 
 I'm wondering if it could be a gnome or kde config issue inside the chroot.
 
 Where do the font settings come from in the chroot (KDE, gnome, xfce)?
 Outside of the chroot I am running XFCE with KDE support enabled.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew

Have you tried changing the scale percentage in the user interface tab
under the Options??
I used it to scale the text of the entire OOo window. I set it up to 95%
and it's quite acceptable.
It's not the perfect solution, but it's a solution ;-)

Just my 2 cents.

Greetings.

mfv


- --
Matteo Vescovi
System Administrator
Studio Vescovi Progettazioni
GPG Fingerprint: 8EF0 F019 80D1 96BF C9C6  387E D6DE 031F 991F 9D2D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE7f9o1t4DH5kfnS0RAn/8AKCxnSRgT+Iqx1wE9xY4iGsEer0zpgCaAn0f
GVNxD9ijmLE+7TM6qt/ia3Y=
=X61L
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OpenOffice in chroot -- fonts?

2006-08-21 Thread Helge Hafting

Andrew Robinson wrote:

I managed to get openoffice to install fine in a ia32 chroot
environment (from pages like [1]). It runs okay, but everything is
extremely large. The fonts (menu bars, dialogs, etc.) are about 18pt
font or so (buttons in the dialogs are huge).

I'm not sure if this is a dpi, font or resolution problem. Would
appreciate some advice. I'm starting to debate ditching amd64 for i386
as much as I'd hate to to avoid all these problems (mplayer  codecs,
flash in firefox, openoffice, wine, etc.).


Use a font server like xfs.  That way, the same fonts will be
available to 32-bit and 64-bit software.

Alternatively, install your font collection in the chroot too.

Helge Hafting


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OpenOffice in chroot -- fonts?

2006-08-20 Thread Andrew Robinson

I managed to get openoffice to install fine in a ia32 chroot
environment (from pages like [1]). It runs okay, but everything is
extremely large. The fonts (menu bars, dialogs, etc.) are about 18pt
font or so (buttons in the dialogs are huge).

I'm not sure if this is a dpi, font or resolution problem. Would
appreciate some advice. I'm starting to debate ditching amd64 for i386
as much as I'd hate to to avoid all these problems (mplayer  codecs,
flash in firefox, openoffice, wine, etc.).

Environment: etch/testing amd64

[1]http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/356


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[broken app] OpenOffice 2.0 for debian-amd64

2006-07-26 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi all,

OpenOffice is still quite far from being usable for amd64 architecture.
I would like to share what I know about this package and try to make it
easier for people to contribute to the amd64 port (bug reports, patches,
and so on).

First of all, few links about OpenOffice:
http://www.openoffice.org/
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Porting_to_x86-64_(AMD64,_EM64T)
http://openoffice.debian.net/
http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openoffice.org.html

Preparing to compile (to be done once):

1) Add the following line to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib

2) Update:
 su -c 'apt-get update'

3) Get the packages needed to compile openoffice.org:
 su -c 'apt-get build-dep -t experimental openoffice.org'

Note: The package boost-build is needed but might not be in the list of
the build-dep (install it by hand if needed)

Once you got all these done, we can get the source and compile it:

1) Get the source from the experimental Debian repository (getting the
sources from the experimental makes it sure to track bugs on the very
last version):
 apt-get source -t experimental openoffice.org

2) Move to the build directory (currently 2.0.3-3)
 cd openoffice-*

3) Ask to build the amd64 arch packages
   In debian/rules change the 'BUILD_AMD64=n' in 'BUILD_AMD64=y'.

4) Build the package (this might take quite a while)
 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc

On my computer, the compilation seems to work for the 2.0.3-3 (I had few
problems with 2.0.3-2) but it takes quite a long time (count
approximately 6-8 hours) and quite a lot of space used during the process.

Once the build process end up, you should find all the debian packages
located one step up from the source directory (openoffice.org-2.0.3/).
Install it and try it and report bugs either to the debian team (through
the reportbug tools for example) or (better) directly to the OpenOffice
team:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/submission_gateway.html#code_module

Making a patch for the debian build system of the openoffice.org
packages is quite complex, I might speak about this later on.

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-25 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Hi
   Edit  openoffice.org-2.0.3/debian/rules and there is some variable
build_amd64???=n that should be y
I only started building it seemed to work properly after that change.

Hope it helps
Gudjon

Þann Mánudagur 24. júlí 2006 23:13 skrifaði Emmanuel Fleury:
 Hi,

 A J Stiles wrote:
  I do not *want* pre-built .debs.  What I specifically want is to compile
  the whole thing from source on my own machine.

 Do the following:

 1) Get the sources:
   apt-get source openoffice.org

 2) Get the packages needed to compile it:
   su -c 'apt-get build-dep openoffice.org'

 3) Go in the directory:
   cd openoffice.org-2.0.3

 4) Build-it:
   dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc

 ...

 Unfortunately, it doesn't work. :-/

 I get a lot of errors:

 ...
 dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-cy in control file
 but not in files list
 dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-ko in control file
 but not in files list
 dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-fr in control file
 but not in files list
 dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-hr in control file
 but not in files list
 dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-ar in control file
 but not in files list
 dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-ja in control file
 but not in files list
 dpkg-genchanges: not including original source code in upload
 dpkg-buildpackage: binary and diff upload (original source NOT included)

 If you find the way to get through this tell me, because I also would
 like to compile it. :)

 Regards
 --
 Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 211
 Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
 LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
 351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-25 Thread Giacomo Mulas

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, sigi wrote:


I'm using this package since it's released, and had only very few
crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
others it has no problem.

Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor .doc-files.
Mostly I use OOo-writer - and that package seems to work very well.


Well, I did experience problems on a sarge box, related to java (on which
openoffice heavily relies). The problem persisted with the java runtime
environments from sun, ibm, blackdown, and apparently was simply due to java
triggering a bug in the libfreetype packaged in sarge. I compiled the sid
libfreetype6 package from source on sarge, installed it and the problem
disappeared completely, with no ill effects apparently. Since this appeared
to be a difficult to track problem, I failed to report it, but here it is. I
could reproduce it consistently by running through the wizard to produce a
fax template.

Bye
Giacomo

--
_

Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI
Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)

Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222
Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916
_

When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are
 (Freddy Mercury)
_

--
Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o
contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e'
risultato non infetto.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-25 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi,

Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
 
Edit  openoffice.org-2.0.3/debian/rules and there is some variable
 build_amd64???=n that should be y
 I only started building it seemed to work properly after that change.

This is right. It works... until some error occurs. :-/

So here is the way to make it works:

1) Get the source from the Debian repository
 apt-get source openoffice.org

2) Get the package needed to compile this (as root)
 su -c 'apt-get build-dep openoffice.org'

3) Move to the build directory
 cd openoffice-*

4) Ask to build the amd64 arch packages
   In debian/rules change the 'BUILD_AMD64=n' in 'BUILD_AMD64=y'.

5) Build the package (this might take quite a while)
 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc


Then, I hit an error in cpp_uno. Briefly, it seems that the bridge
interface has changed and this piece of code hasn't been updated:

bridges::cpp_uno::shared::UnoInterfaceProxy::dispatch(uno_Interface*,
const typelib_TypeDescription*, void*, void**, uno_Any**)' member
function declared in class 'bridges::cpp_uno::shared::UnoInterfaceProxy'
dmake:  Error code 1, while making

==[Complete error log]=

g++ -Wreturn-type -fmessage-length=0 -c -I.  -I. -I../inc -I../../../inc
-I../../../unx/inc -I../../../unxlngx6.pro/inc -I.
-I/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/solver/680/unxlngx6.pro/inc/stl
-I/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/solver/680/unxlngx6.pro/inc/external
-I/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/solver/680/unxlngx6.pro/inc
-I/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/solenv/unxlngx6/inc
-I/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/solenv/inc
-I/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/res
-I/openoffice.org-2.0.3/stlport/stlport
-I/openoffice.org-2.0.3/stlport/include/stlport
-I/openoffice.org-2.0.3/stlport/include/stlport
-I/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/solenv/inc/Xp31
-INO_JAVA_HOME/include -INO_JAVA_HOME/include/linux
-INO_JAVA_HOME/include/native_threads/include -I/usr/include -I.
-I../../../res -I. -O0   -DLEAK_STATIC_DATA -pipe
-Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -fno-use-cxa-atexit -fvisibility-inlines-hidden
-g1 -fexceptions -fno-enforce-eh-specs   -fpic -DLINUX -DUNX -DVCL -DGCC
-DC341 -DX86_64 -DCVER=C341 -D_USE_NAMESPACE -DNPTL -DGLIBC=2 -DX86_64
-D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DNEW_SOLAR -D_USE_NAMESPACE=1
-DSTLPORT_VERSION=400 -DHAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY_FEATURE -D__DMAKE -DUNIX
-DCPPU_ENV=gcc3
-DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2
-DSUPD=680 -DPRODUCT -DNDEBUG -DPRODUCT_FULL -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0
-DEXCEPTIONS_ON -DCUI -DOOC680=OOC680   -DSHAREDLIB -D_DLL_
-DMULTITHREAD  -o ../../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/uno2cpp.o
/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_x86-64/uno2cpp.cxx
/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_x86-64/uno2cpp.cxx:
In function 'void invoke_copy_to_stack(sal_uInt64*, char*, sal_uInt64*,
sal_uInt64*, double*)':
/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_x86-64/uno2cpp.cxx:122:
warning: converting to 'long unsigned int' from 'double'
/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_x86-64/uno2cpp.cxx:
At global scope:
/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_x86-64/uno2cpp.cxx:519:
error: no 'void
bridges::cpp_uno::shared::UnoInterfaceProxy::dispatch(uno_Interface*,
const typelib_TypeDescription*, void*, void**, uno_Any**)' member
function declared in class 'bridges::cpp_uno::shared::UnoInterfaceProxy'
dmake:  Error code 1, while making '../../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/uno2cpp.obj'
'---* tg_merge.mk *---'
dmake:  Error code 255, while making 'do_it_noopt'
'---* tg_merge.mk *---'

ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build/build/ooc680-m7/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_x86-64
make[1]: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/openoffice.org-2.0.3/ooo-build'
make: *** [debian/stampdir/build] Error 2

===

Moreover, when using the packages from
http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.3/amd64/. Saving seems
to be ok but restoring gives:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ooimpress test.odp
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x010855f0 ***

Meaning that some pointer address has been lost (probably because of
some abusive cast).

-- 
Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-24 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi,

A J Stiles wrote:
 
 I do not *want* pre-built .debs.  What I specifically want is to compile the 
 whole thing from source on my own machine.

Do the following:

1) Get the sources:
apt-get source openoffice.org

2) Get the packages needed to compile it:
su -c 'apt-get build-dep openoffice.org'

3) Go in the directory:
cd openoffice.org-2.0.3

4) Build-it:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc

...

Unfortunately, it doesn't work. :-/

I get a lot of errors:

...
dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-cy in control file
but not in files list
dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-ko in control file
but not in files list
dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-fr in control file
but not in files list
dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-hr in control file
but not in files list
dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-ar in control file
but not in files list
dpkg-genchanges: warning: package openoffice.org-l10n-ja in control file
but not in files list
dpkg-genchanges: not including original source code in upload
dpkg-buildpackage: binary and diff upload (original source NOT included)

If you find the way to get through this tell me, because I also would
like to compile it. :)

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury  | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax:   +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
351, Cours de la Libération  | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33405 Talence Cedex, France  | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:57:07PM +0100, Adam Stiles wrote:
 On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
  I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and had
  only very few 
  crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
  others it has no problem.
 
  Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor .doc-files.
  Mostly I use OOo-writer - and that package seems to work very well.
 
 Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?  I'm running 
 64-bit Sid.

On any debian mirror.  It's just not building the .debs for amd64
yet until the maintainer thinks it's ready.  He keeps the .debs
on http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org instead.  It
requires some minor changes to the build scripts to build it
yourself.

Note that upstream still thinks that the 64 bit version is still
alpha quality.  If it's saying saving doesn't work, it might mean
that if you save it, and you try to open it with an other (32
bit) version, it doesn't work.  I kow that didn't use to work,
not sure of how much has been fixed.

In short, don't use a 64 bit version of it, if you can't handle
alpha qualitity software.  If you want something that should
work, wait untils it's properly in the archive.


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-21 Thread A J Stiles
On Thursday 20 July 2006 21:39, sigi wrote:
   Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?
   I'm running 64-bit Sid.

 Read the above mails again, and you will find a working link directly to
 the built debs... ;)

 Download them, install them, and enjoy.

I do not *want* pre-built .debs.  What I specifically want is to compile the 
whole thing from source on my own machine.

-- 
AJS
delta echo bravo six four at earthshod dot co dot uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-21 Thread sigi
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 08:40:56AM +0100, A J Stiles wrote:
 On Thursday 20 July 2006 21:39, sigi wrote:
Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?
I'm running 64-bit Sid.
 
  Read the above mails again, and you will find a working link directly to
  the built debs... ;)
 
  Download them, install them, and enjoy.
 
 I do not *want* pre-built .debs.  What I specifically want is to compile the 
 whole thing from source on my own machine.

OK. But you never mentioned that...sorry.

sigi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-20 Thread Joost Witteveen
Je 2006/07/20(4)/14:07, Joost Witteveen skribis:
 I've been using a 64 bit OOo for a couple weeks now, and have been quite
 pleased with it.  There's a working AMD64 port here:
 
 http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.3/amd64/

That's the 2.0.3-1 version, released 2006-07-01, right? That must
be the same version announced here: http://openoffice.debian.net/
where it's described as: Note that they sttill are not usable; 
for example saving doesn't work...
Now, my uses of OO usually don't include saving anything, but I do
imagine that to be important for some people.

(I run debian-amd64 on a server, where I have no need for OO, so I
haven't tried it myself). 


Or does saving generally work, except for some exotic file formats like .doc?

-- 
Groetjes, joostje
005608398914893a14f10ab33944162d  -
1d8aab438cd59e35b101349479f50ad69c4f52b10945c66db1527492859d1172


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-20 Thread sigi
Hi, 

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:34:48PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
 Je 2006/07/20(4)/14:07, Joost Witteveen skribis:
  I've been using a 64 bit OOo for a couple weeks now, and have been quite
  pleased with it.  There's a working AMD64 port here:
  
  http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.3/amd64/
 
 That's the 2.0.3-1 version, released 2006-07-01, right? That must
 be the same version announced here: http://openoffice.debian.net/
 where it's described as: Note that they sttill are not usable; 
 for example saving doesn't work...
 Now, my uses of OO usually don't include saving anything, but I do
 imagine that to be important for some people.
 
 (I run debian-amd64 on a server, where I have no need for OO, so I
 haven't tried it myself). 
 
 
 Or does saving generally work, except for some exotic file formats like .doc?

I'm using this package since it's released, and had only very few 
crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some 
others it has no problem. 

Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor .doc-files. 
Mostly I use OOo-writer - and that package seems to work very well. 

sigi.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-20 Thread Adam Stiles
On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
 I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and had
 only very few 
 crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
 others it has no problem.

 Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor .doc-files.
 Mostly I use OOo-writer - and that package seems to work very well.

Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?  I'm running 
64-bit Sid.

-- 
AJS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-20 Thread sigi
Hi,

  On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:34:48PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
   Je 2006/07/20(4)/14:07, Joost Witteveen skribis:
I've been using a 64 bit OOo for a couple weeks now, and have been 
quite
pleased with it.  There's a working AMD64 port here:
   
http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.3/amd64/
  
   That's the 2.0.3-1 version, released 2006-07-01, right? That must
   be the same version announced here: http://openoffice.debian.net/
   where it's described as: Note that they sttill are not usable;
   for example saving doesn't work...
   Now, my uses of OO usually don't include saving anything, but I do
   imagine that to be important for some people.
  
   (I run debian-amd64 on a server, where I have no need for OO, so I
   haven't tried it myself).
  
  
   Or does saving generally work, except for some exotic file formats 
   like .doc?
  
  I'm using this package since it's released, and had only very few
  crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with 
  some others it has no problem.
   
  Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor .doc-files.
  Mostly I use OOo-writer - and that package seems to work very well.
  
  Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?  
  I'm running 64-bit Sid.
 
Read the above mails again, and you will find a working link directly to 
the built debs... ;)

Download them, install them, and enjoy.

sigi.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-20 Thread sigi
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:50:13PM +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
 Adam Stiles wrote:
 On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
   
 I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and 
 had
 only very few 
 crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
 others it has no problem.
 
 Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor .doc-files.
 Mostly I use OOo-writer - and that package seems to work very well.
 
 
 Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?  I'm 
 running 64-bit Sid.
 
   
 Just apt-get install openoffice.org

Since when are the debs for amd64 in the official repositories? 
I can't find them. 
If you wanted to give a hint to download the source-files, 
your command is wrong: apt-get source package-name 
would be right, imho.

sigi.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-20 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Hi
   Go to  http://openoffice.debian.net/ and there you will find all 
information but I recommend setting up a chroot for openoffice. I have both 
chroot and amd64 version of openoffice and the 64 bit crashes sometimes when 
opening  doc files. But version 2.0.3 is better than 2.0.2.

/Gudjon

Þann Fimmtudagur 20. júlí 2006 23:15 skrifaði sigi:
 On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:50:13PM +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
  Adam Stiles wrote:
  On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
  I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and
  had
  only very few
  crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
  others it has no problem.
  
  Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor .doc-files.
  Mostly I use OOo-writer - and that package seems to work very well.
  
  Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?  I'm
  running 64-bit Sid.
 
  Just apt-get install openoffice.org

 Since when are the debs for amd64 in the official repositories?
 I can't find them.
 If you wanted to give a hint to download the source-files,
 your command is wrong: apt-get source package-name
 would be right, imho.

 sigi.



Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-20 Thread Thierry Chatelet




sigi wrote:

  On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:50:13PM +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
  
  
Adam Stiles wrote:


  On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
 
  
  
I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and 
had
only very few 
crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
others it has no problem.

Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor .doc-files.
Mostly I use OOo-writer - and that package seems to work very well.
   

  
  Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?  I'm 
running 64-bit Sid.

 
  

Just apt-get install openoffice.org

  
  
Since when are the debs for amd64 in the official repositories? 
I can't find them. 
If you wanted to give a hint to download the source-files, 
your command is wrong: apt-get source package-name 
would be right, imho.

sigi.


  

If you go to there:
http://openoffice.debian.net/install.html
you will get the following information, and it worked for me:
Installing OpenOffice.org
for debian is very easy with apt-get/dselect or
dpkg.

1.Installing OpenOffice.org with apt-get.

If you are using debian-unstable (aka sid), debian-testing (aka
etch) or
debian-stable (aka sarge) you do not need to change /etc/apt/sources.list.
If you are using
debian-oldstable (aka Woody or Debian 3.0r4), you have to choose a
mirror of our
debian-packages-mirrors from here and put it
in your
/etc/apt/sources.list..

Ok, we will go ahead with the installation of OpenOffice.org.
Type apt-get update ; apt-get install openoffice.org.
You can do apt-get install openoffice.org openoffice.org-bin
openoffice.org-l10n-en too, this will work! Choose
openoffice.org-l10n-$CC
for your CountryCode, that you want.
OpenOffice.org is now already installed in the debian-package, so, the
only
thing you need to do is just type openoffice into a shell
or
click on the icons at your WindowManager.
Thierry





Re: Broken applications: Openoffice on AMD64

2006-07-20 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Þann Fimmtudagur 20. júlí 2006 23:15 skrifaði sigi:
 On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:50:13PM +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
  Adam Stiles wrote:
  On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
  I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and
  had
  only very few
  crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
  others it has no problem.
  
  Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor .doc-files.
  Mostly I use OOo-writer - and that package seems to work very well.
  
  Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?  I'm
  running 64-bit Sid.
 
  Just apt-get install openoffice.org

 Since when are the debs for amd64 in the official repositories?
 I can't find them.
 If you wanted to give a hint to download the source-files,
 your command is wrong: apt-get source package-name
 would be right, imho.

 sigi.
Sorry I forgot to read the whole thread before posting my last email:) The 
source files are in the official repositories although the amd64 files are 
not.
Add
deb-src ...
into the sources.list file and then type
apt-src install openoffice.org
but I did not find out how to compile it
fakeroot debian/rules binary did not work and neither did pdebuild. I would 
like to know how to build it even if I am not going to.

Hope it helps and I'm not off topic
Gudjon




Re: chroot and openoffice

2006-06-24 Thread thomas parquier

2006/6/20, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Hi,

thomas parquier wrote:
 I'm using openoffice.org 2.0 in a chroot, and I can't open nfs mounted
 files.
 I get this message :
 input/output general error while accessing to /mnt/server/path/file.odt..
 (translated from french :)

Which version exactly?

Regards,

Rene


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEmHzk+FmQsCSK63MRAtd+AJ44mnj55eR2rgvEJLdfnLaUf95jaQCcDeT8
coRiMlRWizwpRtPr8OGaqfY=
=ZxHA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





I'm working on sarge with some etch packages
openoffice.org 2.0 build-1
schroot is 0.2.9-1
nfs-common is 1:1.0.7-9
nfs-user-server is 2.2beta47-22


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



chroot and openoffice

2006-06-20 Thread thomas parquier

Hi,

I'm using openoffice.org 2.0 in a chroot, and I can't open nfs mounted files.
I get this message :
input/output general error while accessing to /mnt/server/path/file.odt..
(translated from french :)
Server is actualy mounted in /chroot/mnt (automounted), I put a symlink in /.

BTW, I mounted my home partition in the chroot path too and made a
symlink in /, which I guess is a problem because schroot told me it
couldnt chdir to the path. I dealt with it by adding
cd /
before the exec schroot line in do_chroot, which is not very clean to me.

thanks
tom


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: chroot and openoffice

2006-06-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi,

thomas parquier wrote:
 I'm using openoffice.org 2.0 in a chroot, and I can't open nfs mounted 
 files.
 I get this message :
 input/output general error while accessing to /mnt/server/path/file.odt..
 (translated from french :)

Which version exactly?

Regards,

Rene


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: autofs and openoffice

2006-05-01 Thread thomas parquier

Ok, I've just changed the classic mount to a bind-mount, for the home partition.
But there's still the error a mentioned. Regarding the twice
auto-mounted remote shares, I believe that if you're right about twice
mounted filesystem, it should not be good to do so with autofs too.
But I don't how to deal with all that. The problem with bind-mounted
folders is that it seems not to be correctly sync'ed : I mean remote
shares auto-mounted in the original folder are not visible in the
bind-mounted one.

tom

2006/4/28, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

thomas parquier wrote:

Hello everybody,

I'm having problem with openoffice, which is launched in a chroot'ed
environment.
I automount a remote directory in my home partition which is mounted
twice, once in the host environment and once in the chroot :
fstab :
/dev/sda10 /home ...
/dev/sda10 /var/chroot/sarge-ia32/home

then I put two mount points in auto.master with the same map :
/mnt/cassiopee   /etc/auto.line.classe   --timeout=60
/var/chroot/sarge-ia32/mnt/cassiopee   /etc/auto.line.classe   --timeout=60

In openoffice, files from the remote directory can only be opened in
read-only mode, and new files can't be saved in that directory
correctly : an empty file is saved whereas a input/output error poped
up.

Has someone any idea to open and save correctly those files from and
to the remote point ?
thanks in advance



I don't think you can mount a file system twice. You can, however,
bind-mount /home so that it appears in /var/chroot/sarge-ia32/home. It's
all explained in the amd64 howto.


--
Pascal is Pascal is Pascal is dog meat.
-- M. Devine and P. Larson, Computer Science 340

Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://move.to/hpkb


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: autofs and openoffice

2006-05-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:08:24PM +0200, thomas parquier wrote:
 Ok, I've just changed the classic mount to a bind-mount, for the home 
 partition.
 But there's still the error a mentioned. Regarding the twice
 auto-mounted remote shares, I believe that if you're right about twice
 mounted filesystem, it should not be good to do so with autofs too.
 But I don't how to deal with all that. The problem with bind-mounted
 folders is that it seems not to be correctly sync'ed : I mean remote
 shares auto-mounted in the original folder are not visible in the
 bind-mounted one.

It isn't supposed to.  bind mounts make a clone if exactly what is there
right now at the time of the mount.  Anything added later is new stuff
and does not and should not be bind mounted.

A common workaround is to do this:

point automount to /mychrootpath/home/...
ln -s /home - /mychrootpath/home

So your automounter points at the chroot path from the main system, and
can of course access everything.  The chroot knows nothing other than
when it asks for something, somehow it magically gets mounted.  The main
system being able to see the chroot stuff can use a symlink to it just
fine and cause the automounter to work.  What this doesn't solve is
trying to have two chroots work with an automounter.  For that I can't
think of any solution.

It would be nice to have a bind mount that actively passes on new mounts
under the original one, but at this time I don't think we have any such
thing.  Even rbind just recursively bind mounts every mount in a tree,
that are present when the rbind mount is performed but does nothing for
new mounts later on.

Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: autofs and openoffice

2006-04-28 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
thomas parquier wrote:

Hello everybody,

I'm having problem with openoffice, which is launched in a chroot'ed
environment.
I automount a remote directory in my home partition which is mounted
twice, once in the host environment and once in the chroot :
fstab :
/dev/sda10 /home ...
/dev/sda10 /var/chroot/sarge-ia32/home

then I put two mount points in auto.master with the same map :
/mnt/cassiopee   /etc/auto.line.classe   --timeout=60
/var/chroot/sarge-ia32/mnt/cassiopee   /etc/auto.line.classe   --timeout=60

In openoffice, files from the remote directory can only be opened in
read-only mode, and new files can't be saved in that directory
correctly : an empty file is saved whereas a input/output error poped
up.

Has someone any idea to open and save correctly those files from and
to the remote point ?
thanks in advance

  

I don't think you can mount a file system twice. You can, however,
bind-mount /home so that it appears in /var/chroot/sarge-ia32/home. It's
all explained in the amd64 howto.


-- 
Pascal is Pascal is Pascal is dog meat.
-- M. Devine and P. Larson, Computer Science 340

Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://move.to/hpkb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



autofs and openoffice

2006-04-27 Thread thomas parquier
Hello everybody,

I'm having problem with openoffice, which is launched in a chroot'ed
environment.
I automount a remote directory in my home partition which is mounted
twice, once in the host environment and once in the chroot :
fstab :
/dev/sda10 /home ...
/dev/sda10 /var/chroot/sarge-ia32/home

then I put two mount points in auto.master with the same map :
/mnt/cassiopee   /etc/auto.line.classe   --timeout=60
/var/chroot/sarge-ia32/mnt/cassiopee   /etc/auto.line.classe   --timeout=60

In openoffice, files from the remote directory can only be opened in
read-only mode, and new files can't be saved in that directory
correctly : an empty file is saved whereas a input/output error poped
up.

Has someone any idea to open and save correctly those files from and
to the remote point ?
thanks in advance

tom



Re: openoffice good news

2006-04-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi,

Rafael Rodr?guez wrote:
 http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/blog/archives/monthly/2006-04.html#2006-04-10T20_53_15.htm

This does not mean that porting OpenOffice.org to x86-64 is over[...]
  [...] Of course, no-one says how much it will work for you ;-)

Still looks as a working OOo is just a few versions away.

Regards,

Rene


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


openoffice good news

2006-04-10 Thread Rafael Rodríguez
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/blog/archives/monthly/2006-04.html#2006-04-10T20_53_15.htm


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem with OpenOffice in chroot

2006-04-03 Thread Sylvain Archenault

Hello,

Since this morning, I can't run OpenOffice in my chroot. Here is the 
output :

dchroot -c ia32 -d -q oowriter
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 7: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 9: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 11: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: oowriter: line 13: syntax error near unexpected token `{'
/usr/bin/oowriter: oowriter: line 13: `if ($SystemInstallDir =~ /^@/) {'

If I execute oowriter within the chroot (i.e after 'chroot 
/var/chroot/sid-ia32'), it works.


I have no idea where the problem comes from.

Thanks.

--
Sylvain Archenault


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with OpenOffice in chroot

2006-04-03 Thread Sylvain Archenault
Thanks to a private message, I found the solution, I needed to downgrade 
to login_4.0.15-1 
(http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2006/03/23/debian/pool/main/s/shadow/login_4.0.15-1_i386.deb).


Have a nice day :)

Sylvain Archenault wrote:

Hello,

Since this morning, I can't run OpenOffice in my chroot. Here is the 
output :

dchroot -c ia32 -d -q oowriter
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 7: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 9: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 11: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: oowriter: line 13: syntax error near unexpected token 
`{'

/usr/bin/oowriter: oowriter: line 13: `if ($SystemInstallDir =~ /^@/) {'

If I execute oowriter within the chroot (i.e after 'chroot 
/var/chroot/sid-ia32'), it works.


I have no idea where the problem comes from.

Thanks.



--
Sylvain Archenault


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with OpenOffice in chroot

2006-04-03 Thread Clive Menzies
On (03/04/06 16:50), Sylvain Archenault wrote:
 Thanks to a private message, I found the solution, I needed to downgrade 
 to login_4.0.15-1 
 (http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2006/03/23/debian/pool/main/s/shadow/login_4.0.15-1_i386.deb).
 
 Have a nice day :)

Thanks Sylvain

I was bitten by this, this morning and had to boot into another Debian
system to use OOo.

It will be a nice day now :)

Regards

Clive

-- 
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: openoffice 2.0.2 on amd64

2006-03-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
[ Cc'ing Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] who also did build
unofficial, broken amd64 debs for 2.0.1-1 and provided them publically.
also Cc'ing -amd64 ]

Hi,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Modify debian/control file
append amd64 on Architecture: for each necessary packages.

Wrong. (although it has the same effect, but...)

find $(PKGDIR)-$$i -type f -name *.1 | xargs gzip -9; \
 ---
find $(PKGDIR)-$$i -type f -name *.1 | xargs gzip -9 -f; \

What for?

 copy some file
cp debian/catalog.xml
 debian/openoffice.org-common/usr/lib/openoffice/share/dtd/officedocument/1_0/catalog.xml

Err? This also is there:

debian/rules:

[...]
cp debian/catalog.xml 
$(PKGDIR)-common/$(OODIR)/share/dtd/officedocument/1_0
[...]

 I put deb result files on my ftp server
 user : anonymous
 pass : your email
 host : terra.secouristes-francais.org

Besides the fact that this is not reachable:

Can you please stop this nonsense with providing debs which don't
really work because OOo is not yet amd64-ready somewhere on the net
where *I* then get questions about its unstability?

I'll (if possible) build amd64 debs for each upload.

(btw, did you even look at people.debian.org where there *are* 2.0.2
packages for OOo/amd64 built native? Of course with the known bugs.)
Please remove them from your servers. *If* you want to link to some
please link to people.debian.org. But as said, amd64 porting is not yet
complete and the OOo not really useful...

Use 32-bit OOo when you want a usable OOo. (We are planning to provide a
_amd64 deb containing the 32-bit stuff...)
If you want to help with the porting itself, nice, but do it inside the
official things and don't provide dozens of _amd64 debs which equally are
broken.

Regards,

Rene


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Porting OpenOffice to AMD64

2006-03-09 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi all,

I just want to advertise the new Wiki system of OpenOffice and to pint
out a page specifically dedicated to the OpenOffice port to AMD64.

http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Porting_to_x86-64_%28AMD64%2C_EM64T%29

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury

A child of five could understand this. Fetch me a child of five.
  -- Groucho Marx


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Porting OpenOffice to AMD64

2006-03-09 Thread Mickael Marchand
Emmanuel Fleury a écrit :
 Hi all,
 
 I just want to advertise the new Wiki system of OpenOffice and to pint
 out a page specifically dedicated to the OpenOffice port to AMD64.
 
 http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page
 http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Porting_to_x86-64_%28AMD64%2C_EM64T%29
 
 Regards

I've given a quick look to compile oo debs on amd64 with gcj-4.1
for now I could not get it to go past the configure step, OOo does not
like debian's gcj-4.1 apparently. I probably need to tweak some
configure options.

Cheers,
Mik


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Porting OpenOffice to AMD64

2006-03-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi,

Mickael Marchand wrote:
 Emmanuel Fleury a ?crit :
  Hi all,
  
  I just want to advertise the new Wiki system of OpenOffice and to pint
  out a page specifically dedicated to the OpenOffice port to AMD64.
  
  http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page
  http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Porting_to_x86-64_%28AMD64%2C_EM64T%29
  
  Regards
 
 I've given a quick look to compile oo debs on amd64 with gcj-4.1
 for now I could not get it to go past the configure step, OOo does not
 like debian's gcj-4.1 apparently. I probably need to tweak some
 configure options.

Jup.

FWIW, I did build 2.0.2-1 for amd64 with gcj 4.0. It still is broken as
known and this will not change as fast as many people assume. The stuff
get SLOWLY forward, though.

(http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.2/experimental, _all
ones in ..)

We (Goswin and me) currently are planning on providing debs for amd64,
though, that being the 32bit OOo but that needs some work and testing.

Stay tuned... Trying to use the amd64 OOo for anything else than
bbuilding and seeing how broken it is (except helping the port itself)
is completely senseless at the moment...

Regards,

Rene
 - who now also has a amd64 and just tried again to see it himself ;)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Porting OpenOffice to AMD64

2006-03-09 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Rene Engelhard wrote:
 
 FWIW, I did build 2.0.2-1 for amd64 with gcj 4.0. It still is broken as
 known and this will not change as fast as many people assume. The stuff
 get SLOWLY forward, though.
 
 (http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.2/experimental, _all
 ones in ..)
 
 We (Goswin and me) currently are planning on providing debs for amd64,
 though, that being the 32bit OOo but that needs some work and testing.

These are great news ! :) Thanks.

 Stay tuned... Trying to use the amd64 OOo for anything else than
 building and seeing how broken it is (except helping the port itself)
 is completely senseless at the moment...

Yes.

  - who now also has a amd64 and just tried again to see it himself ;)

Nice to hear also, it's a good little machine still a bit young but very
promising. ;-)

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury

I made up the term 'object-oriented', and I can tell you
I didn't have C++ in mind.
  -- Alan Kay, OOPSLA'97


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problems with OpenOffice for AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Tobias Krais
Hi together,

I recently installed Debian OpenOffice.org packages from
deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./

Everything work great, but: I can't open .odt (well all .od*) files and
also the .sxw (all .sx*) files. Is it the same with your Installation.
All other files (e.g. .doc files) open without problems. I even can
create .odt files.

Is there w workaround for this?

Greetings, Tobias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems with OpenOffice for AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Tobias Krais
Hi Michael,

I recently installed Debian OpenOffice.org packages from
deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./

Everything work great, but: I can't open .odt (well all .od*) files and
also the .sxw (all .sx*) files. Is it the same with your Installation.
All other files (e.g. .doc files) open without problems. I even can
create .odt files.

Is there w workaround for this?

 this OOo build is known to be highly experimental, for now, there is
 nothing much you can do except reporting bugs to the OpenOffice bugtracker.
 
 I will try to build new packages soon based on the recent new upload.

OK, I will wait. I am happy that there are Debian Packages. And they
work quite well. Thanks!

Greetings, Tobias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems with OpenOffice for AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Adam Stiles
On Monday 06 Mar 2006 09:18, Tobias Krais wrote:
 Hi together,

 I recently installed Debian OpenOffice.org packages from
 deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./

Do you have a link to a corresponding deb-src line, or at least the .diff 
file?

-- 
AJS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems with OpenOffice for AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Tobias Krais
Hi Adam,

I recently installed Debian OpenOffice.org packages from
deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./

 Do you have a link to a corresponding deb-src line, or at least the .diff 
 file?

no. I found this deb with google, but without any deb-src.

But maybe this helps:
ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/compile_openoffice_x86_64.diff
ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/Makefile

Greetings, Tobias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems with OpenOffice for AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Mickael Marchand wrote:
 Tobias Krais a écrit :
 
Hi together,

I recently installed Debian OpenOffice.org packages from
deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./

Everything work great, but: I can't open .odt (well all .od*) files and
also the .sxw (all .sx*) files. Is it the same with your Installation.
All other files (e.g. .doc files) open without problems. I even can
create .odt files.

Is there w workaround for this?

Greetings, Tobias


 
 
 this OOo build is known to be highly experimental, for now, there is
 nothing much you can do except reporting bugs to the OpenOffice bugtracker.
 
 I will try to build new packages soon based on the recent new upload.

There are some problems due to the gcj compiler (better go for 4.1 to
solve this issue).

But, why don't you try on the 2.0.2 version (I should try as well) --
http://lwn.net/Articles/172474/

1) wget http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.1.0.tar.gz
2) tar xzf ooo-build-oob680.1.0.tar.gz
3) cd ooo-build-oob680.1.0
4) ./configure --with-distro=Debian64
5) ./download
6) make

Any help to make it compile on an AMD64 would be great ! ;-)

Report patches and fixes to:
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/openoffice

See also:
http://go-oo.org/

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury

The highest goal of computer science is to automate that
which can be automated.
  -- D. L. VerLee


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems with OpenOffice for AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Mickael Marchand
Emmanuel Fleury a écrit :
 Mickael Marchand wrote:
 Tobias Krais a écrit :

 Hi together,

 I recently installed Debian OpenOffice.org packages from
 deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./

 Everything work great, but: I can't open .odt (well all .od*) files and
 also the .sxw (all .sx*) files. Is it the same with your Installation.
 All other files (e.g. .doc files) open without problems. I even can
 create .odt files.

 Is there w workaround for this?

 Greetings, Tobias



 this OOo build is known to be highly experimental, for now, there is
 nothing much you can do except reporting bugs to the OpenOffice bugtracker.

 I will try to build new packages soon based on the recent new upload.
 
 There are some problems due to the gcj compiler (better go for 4.1 to
 solve this issue).

I think I used the experimental gcj 4.1 to build the previous packages
(not sure, I did quite some tries :)

but it's definitely the way to go now.

Cheers,
Mik

 
 But, why don't you try on the 2.0.2 version (I should try as well) --
 http://lwn.net/Articles/172474/
 
 1) wget http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.1.0.tar.gz
 2) tar xzf ooo-build-oob680.1.0.tar.gz
 3) cd ooo-build-oob680.1.0
 4) ./configure --with-distro=Debian64
 5) ./download
 6) make
 
 Any help to make it compile on an AMD64 would be great ! ;-)
 
 Report patches and fixes to:
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/openoffice
 
 See also:
 http://go-oo.org/
 
 Regards


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems with OpenOffice for AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
 
 But, why don't you try on the 2.0.2 version (I should try as well) --
 http://lwn.net/Articles/172474/
 
 1) wget http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.1.0.tar.gz

Ooops. Old version, sorry --
http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.5.0.tar.gz

But, better check the last version on http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/
anyway. :)

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury

I always pass on good advice. It is the only thing to do with it.
It is never of any use to oneself.
  -- Oscar Wilde


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems with OpenOffice for AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Klaus Becker
Le Montag 6 März 2006 15:58, Emmanuel Fleury a écrit :
 Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
  But, why don't you try on the 2.0.2 version (I should try as well) --
  http://lwn.net/Articles/172474/
 
  1) wget http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.1.0.tar.gz

 Ooops. Old version, sorry --
 http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.5.0.tar.gz

 But, better check the last version on http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/
 anyway. :)

Is this possible for Sarge or only for Sid? I suppose only for Sid because:

$ apt-cache search gcj
gcj - The GNU Java compiler
gcj-3.3 - The GNU compiler for Java(TM)
gcj-3.4 - The GNU compiler for Java(TM)
libgcj-common - Java runtime library (common files)
libgcj-dev - Java development headers and static library for use with gcj
libgcj4 - Java runtime library for use with gcj
libgcj4-awt - AWT peer runtime libraries for use with gcj
libgcj4-common - Java runtime library for use with gcj (jar files)
libgcj4-dev - Java development headers and static library for use with gcj
libgcj5 - Java runtime library for use with gcj
libgcj5-awt - AWT peer runtime libraries for use with gcj
libgcj5-common - Java runtime library for use with gcj (jar files)
libgcj5-dev - Java development headers and static library for use with gcj
openoffice.org - OpenOffice.org Office suite version 2.0

and not gcj-4.1

cheers

Klaus




Re: Problems with OpenOffice for AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Tobias Krais
Hi Klaus,

 Is this possible for Sarge or only for Sid? I suppose only for Sid because:

I had to use experimental some days ago.

Greetings, Tobias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   3   >