Re: Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem

2009-08-26 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi!

 Ancient bug dig up, I know. ;)

* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fabbi...@fabbione.net [2004-09-17 11:23:15 CEST]:
 On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
  Package: apache
  Version: 1.3.31-6
  Severity: important
 
  #269009's usage of www-browser instead of lynx raised a new problem: Not
  all www-browser alternatives do support -dump.
 
 This is a browser problem. Almost all the www-browsers support -dump. I
 fail to see why it is an apache problem to work around it. A package that
 offers an alternative should be capable to provide all the basic options
 as the others.

 I agree - and I see one way people can make use of it: defining LYNX in
/etc/apache2/envvars like e.g.:

#v+
export LYNX=netrik --dump
#v-

 That should work from reading the source and fix the issue for
everyone.

 Do you think you could add that either as a comment into the envvars
file that this is possible, or put it into some other docs? That could
then be assumed as a fix for this bug. :)

 Thanks in advance!
Rhonda


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem

2004-09-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 272069 wontfix
Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

 severity 272069 wishlist
Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem
Severity set to `wishlist'.

 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)




Re: Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem

2004-09-17 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
tag 272069 wontfix
severity 272069 wishlist
stop

On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:

 Package: apache
 Version: 1.3.31-6
 Severity: important

 #269009's usage of www-browser instead of lynx raised a new problem: Not
 all www-browser alternatives do support -dump.

This is a browser problem. Almost all the www-browsers support -dump. I
fail to see why it is an apache problem to work around it. A package that
offers an alternative should be capable to provide all the basic options
as the others.

 netrik e.g. does need
 --dump. Switching to --dump on the other hand would make w3m getting
 problems. I don't know for other browsers that do the www-browser
 alternative like (e)links, lynx supports both.

Well one of the 2 will have to switch. I am not dealing to implements 20
different exceptions because of this.

  This needs to be addressed soon and should IMHO definitely go into
 sarge. What a clean solution is I don't really now. It would be great if
 w3m supports GNU-style options, but I don't think that that is going to
 happen soon.

I am leaving this bug open, but i don't believe it is our job to fix it so
for me it's a wishlist that i wontfix.

If you have valid arguments, I am wide open for discussion (that's why i
am not closing it), but to me looks like an inconsistency between
www-browsers that needs to be solved there.

Fabio

-- 
user fajita: step one
fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
user fajita: step two
fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.




Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem

2004-09-17 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.31-6
Severity: important

#269009's usage of www-browser instead of lynx raised a new problem: Not
all www-browser alternatives do support -dump. netrik e.g. does need
--dump. Switching to --dump on the other hand would make w3m getting
problems. I don't know for other browsers that do the www-browser
alternative like (e)links, lynx supports both.

 This needs to be addressed soon and should IMHO definitely go into
sarge. What a clean solution is I don't really now. It would be great if
w3m supports GNU-style options, but I don't think that that is going to
happen soon.

 Thanks for working on it in advance.
Alfie
-- 
Aber der Aufwand Linux zu installieren und vim zu lernen ist *IMMER*
geringer, als Outlook das Schreiben von vernünftigen Mails beizubringen. ;)
  -- Jens Benecke [2001-06-02]