Bug#250820: Installer fails to create and install RAID volumes

[Martin Michlmayr]

reassign 250820 mdcfg
thanks

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-25 08:11]:
> 1) When I selected the partitions to use for RAID1, the installer
> stopped during mdadm --create.  The reason is IMO that it waits for
> partition overwrite confirmation. Maybe mdadm should be run with
> --run option ?

Yes, I noticed this yesterday and added the -R option.

> 2) Furtunately I could do mdadm by hand, so the installation could
> continue, but it failed a while later when installing kernel-image
> package, since it wanted to run mkinitrd and that depended on
> raidtools2, which was not installed

Were you trying to have your / system on RAID?  This currently waits
with the error you mentioned, but will be fixed soon.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#250820: Installer fails to create and install RAID volumes

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 250820 mdcfg
Bug#250820: Installer fails to create and install RAID volumes
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `mdcfg'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250820: Installer fails to create and install RAID volumes

[benkovsky]

Package: installation
Version: current as of 2004-05-24


Hi,
I am trying to use Sarge images from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso

and I have encountered a problem during installation on RAID1 volume. The partitions I 
used for the mirrorset
were already existing, but were formatted as EXT3 from previous installation attempts.

1)
When I selected the partitions to use for RAID1, the installer stopped during mdadm 
--create.
The reason is IMO that it waits for partition overwrite confirmation. Maybe mdadm 
should
be run with --run option ?

2)
Furtunately I could do mdadm by hand, so the installation could continue, but
it failed a while later when installing kernel-image package, since it wanted to run
mkinitrd and that depended on raidtools2, which was not installed

Regards,
Jarda Benkovsky

--
GCM/IT d- s:+ a- C++(+++) ULOI$ P++ L+++> E+ W++
N w--- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP R+ tv- b+++ D+ e+++ y+



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[l10n] missing quik stats

[Giuseppe Sacco]

Hi all,
it seems to me that quik is missing from seppy pages. Is this made on
pourpose? Is quik still required to be translated?

Thansk,
Giuseppe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250800: sarge_d-i mips netboot installation

[Nicholas Breen]

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: sarge_d-i 20040524, mips netinst cd
uname -a: Linux ephemeral 2.4.25-r4k-ip22 #1 Thu Apr 15 20:46:28 BST 2004 mips 
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-05-24
Method: netinst (CD) install, SCSI CD-ROM

Machine: SGI Indy
Processor: MIPS R4600, 133 MHz
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: 4 GB SCSI hard disk
Root Size/partition table: 
/dev/sda1 - 3.8 GB root, ext3
/dev/sda2 - 200 MB swap
(also a small volhdr partition #9 at the start of the disk)
Output of lspci: n/a

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]

Comments/Problems:

The initial language selection screen still doesn't display accented
characters correctly.

Selecting the "single partition" option in the partitioner correctly
displays an ext3 root as partition 1 and swap as partition 2.  However,
the confirmation screen shows swap as partition 17.  Attempting to mount
the swap space then fails, since there is no partition 17 - the dialog box
error message displays no partition number at all.  ("The attempt to mount
a file system with type swap in SCSI1 (0,5,0), partition # at none failed.")
No errors appear on vt3, and the only informative notice on vt4 is a 
standard "Unable to find swap-space signature" warning.

The automatically generated partition table is not correct.  A partial
transcription:
Pt#  Start   End  Id  System
 1:  1   967   3  SGI raw <-- should be type 83 (Linux native)
 2:968  1018   0  SGI volhdr  <-- should be type 82 (swap)
11:  0  1018   6  SGI volume

Additionally, there should be a partition 9 of type SGI volhdr at the
beginning of the disk -- this is where the bootloader must be installed.
Five cylinders is a typical size.

Going back to the main menu and selecting the old (fdisk) partitioning
also failed - attempting to delete partitions crashed fdisk immediately with
a floating point exception.  Seems like some of the issues encountered in
#238363 and friends haven't been entirely resolved

After using dd to zero out the partition table, fdisk was able to create
partitions successfully.

The remainder of the installation completed without problems, including the
new firmware variables reminder in arcboot-installer (thanks Thiemo!).


-- 
Nicholas Breen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#239794: marked as done (ddetect: new subarch powerpc/iseries)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2004 22:40:29 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2004 11:09:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 24 03:09:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.seg.de) [195.126.221.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B66GC-0003Wl-00; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 03:09:24 -0800
Received: from S44A0262.SEG.DE (unverified [195.126.221.65]) by mail.seg.de
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>;
 Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:08:32 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Notes-Item: ;
 flags=45; name=INetCopyTo
X-Notes-Item: .;
 name=$StorageTo
X-Notes-Item: 79233D72:F266A0BE-C1256E61:00364FE1;
 type=4; name=$Orig
X-Notes-Item: Memo;
 name=Form
X-Notes-Item: CN=Karl Kappel/O=segmueller/C=DE;
 name=AltFrom
X-Notes-Item: StdNotesLtr17;
 name=Logo
X-Notes-Item: True;
 name=useApplet
X-Notes-Item: 0;
 name=Sign
X-Notes-Item: 1;
 name=DefaultMailSaveOptions
X-Notes-Item: ;
 name=Query_String
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ddetect: new subarch powerpc/iseries
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8  June 18, 2001
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:08:23 +0100
X-Notes-Item: ;
 name=Encrypt
X-Notes-Item: ;
 type=501; flags=44; name=$UpdatedBy
X-Notes-Item: CN=segds001/O=segmueller/C=DE;
 type=501; flags=0; name=RouteServers
X-Notes-Item: 24
 =?iso-8859-2?Q?-M=E4r-2004_12=3A08=3A23_CET=2F24-M=E4r-2004_12=3A08=3A24?=
 CET;
 type=401; flags=0; name=RouteTimes
X-Notes-Item: 0;
 name=$MsgTrackFlags
X-Notes-Item: CN=Karl Kappel/O=segmueller/C=DE;
 name=OriginalPrincipal
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on segds001/segmueller/DE(Version 5.0.10 |April 30, 
2002) at
 24.03.2004 12:08:24,
Serialize complete at 24.03.2004 12:08:24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ddetect
Version: 0.78
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Hi,

Please consider applying the attached patch in order to make
the subarch powerpc/iseries available with debian-installer.

Regards
Karl

diff -u ddetect-0.78/archdetect-powerpc-linux.c 
ddetect-0.78-ise/archdetect-powerpc-linux.c
--- ddetect-0.78/archdetect-powerpc-linux.c 2004-03-22 
17:55:28.0 +0100
+++ ddetect-0.78-ise/archdetect-powerpc-linux.c 2004-03-24 
10:48:24.0 +0100
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
{ "CHRP Pegasos", "chrp_pegasos" },
{ "CHRP", "chrp" },
{ "Amiga", "amiga" },
+{ "64-bit iSeries Logical Partition", "iseries" },
{ NULL, NULL }
 };

Common subdirectories: ddetect-0.78/debian and ddetect-0.78-ise/debian







---
Received: (at 239794-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 01:42:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 24 18:42:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BSQxA-0001Jw-00; Mon, 24 May 2004 18:42:04 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [200.96.127.34])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3E61B1896F; Tue, 25 May 2004 01:41:28 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 86FFE6EB4F; Mon, 24 May 2004 22:40:30 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 22:40:29 -0300
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Cros

Bug#244145: marked as done (Shows modules twice)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2004 22:40:29 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2004 23:36:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 16 16:36:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BEctD-00044f-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:36:55 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 9A30064D4F; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 23:36:54 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A323010864; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:36:43 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:36:43 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Shows modules twice
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: ddetect
Severity: minor

I have two Ethernet cards with the same chip, and hw-detect shows them
twice:

   [?] Detect hardware

   The following Linux kernel modules were detected as matching your
   hardware. If you know some are unnecessary, or cause problems, you
   can choose not to load them. If you're unsure, you should leave them
   all selected.

   Modules to load:

  [*] tulip (Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43)#
  [*] tulip (Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43)
  [*] ncr53c8xx (Symbios Logic Inc. / NCR 53c860)
  [*] floppy (Linux Floppy)

and:

 [.] Detect hardware
 Unable to load some modules
 Linux kernel modules needed to drive some of your hardware are not
 available yet. Simply proceeding with the install may make these
 modules available later.

 The unavailable modules, and the devices that need them are: tulip
 (Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43), tulip (Digital
 Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43), ncr53c8xx (Symbios Logic
 Inc. / NCR 53c860)

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 244145-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 01:42:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 24 18:42:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BSQxA-0001Jw-00; Mon, 24 May 2004 18:42:04 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [200.96.127.34])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3E61B1896F; Tue, 25 May 2004 01:41:28 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 86FFE6EB4F; Mon, 24 May 2004 22:40:30 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 22:40:29 -0300
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3


--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

These bugs were fixed in version 0.85 of hw-detect.

--=20
see shy jo

--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAsqQMd8HHehbQuO8RAnY7AJ0SIrRbEK+cK6ncdI95ffNNITCJHACguca8
sIz4/8OBHH1yzCKJIROSfBE=
=v+C0

Processed: tagging 249355, tagging 249355

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 249355 - moreinfo
Bug#249355: cpqarray module is not loaded during install (before partitioning) despite 
being recognized correctly
Tags were: moreinfo patch d-i
Tags removed: moreinfo

> tags 249355 - patch
Bug#249355: cpqarray module is not loaded during install (before partitioning) despite 
being recognized correctly
Tags were: patch d-i
Tags removed: patch

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250740: marked as done (/etc/network/interfaces didn't include eth0)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2004 18:08:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed with netcfg 0.67
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2004 18:11:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 24 11:11:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lio.fmi.uni-sofia.bg (smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg) [62.44.101.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BSJvE-0005bA-00; Mon, 24 May 2004 11:11:36 -0700
Received: from fmi.uni-sofia.bg ([62.44.101.57])
by smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg
for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:10:06 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 21:14:36 +0300
From: Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Sofia
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: /etc/network/interfaces didn't include eth0
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040523/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux roller.fmi.uni-sofia.bg 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 
16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-05-24
Method: netinst.iso

Machine:
Processor: Pentium III 2x933
Memory: 256M
Root Device: IDE, 30G
Root Size/partition table:  / on 20G, swap on 512M
Output of lspci and lspci -n:

:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C693A/694x [Apollo 
PRO133x] (rev c4)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C598/694x [Apollo 
MVP3/Pro133x AGP]
:00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super 
South] (rev 40)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 
controller] (rev 16)
:00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 
controller] (rev 16)
:00:07.4 SMBus: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] 
(rev 40)
:00:0b.0 Multimedia audio controller: C-Media Electronics Inc CM8738 
(rev 10)
:00:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon 
RV100 QY [Radeon 7000/VE]

:00:00.0 Class 0600: 1106:0691 (rev c4)
:00:01.0 Class 0604: 1106:8598
:00:07.0 Class 0601: 1106:0686 (rev 40)
:00:07.1 Class 0101: 1106:0571 (rev 06)
:00:07.2 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 16)
:00:07.3 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 16)
:00:07.4 Class 0c05: 1106:3057 (rev 40)
:00:0b.0 Class 0401: 13f6:0111 (rev 10)
:00:0c.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10)
:01:00.0 Class 0300: 1002:5159


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]

Comments/Problems:

There was one problem.  My network card (RealTek 8139C) was recognized 
during 1st stage (module 8139too is loaded), I entered IP, etc. 
ifconfig showed configured eth0.  After reboot module 8139too was loaded 
but eth0 was not configured.  There wasn't any configuration for eth0 in 
/etc/network/interfaces.  There was configuration only for lo.


Install logs and other status info is available in 
/var/log/debian-installer/.
Once you have filled out this report, mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
Received: (at 250740-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 01:11:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 24 18:11:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp812.mail.sc5.yah

netcfg_0.67_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.67_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.67_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.67_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.67_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.67.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.67.dsc
netcfg_0.67.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.67.tar.gz
netcfg_0.67_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.67_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of netcfg_0.67_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

netcfg_0.67_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  netcfg_0.67.dsc
  netcfg_0.67.tar.gz
  netcfg_0.67_i386.udeb
  netcfg-dhcp_0.67_i386.udeb
  netcfg-static_0.67_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

你好!

[gsdfd]

《23万失效专利》  价格：300元


失效专利几乎每天都会发生，从1985年专利法实施以来，全国的失效专利已累计达23万件。失效专利虽然失去了专利法保护，但其技术含量和市场价值还是有相当一部分并未失效，根据《专利法》及其实施细则规定，专利申请文件必须公开该技术，并且要达到同行业的普通工程技术人员不经过再创造性劳动，可以重复实施该技术，生产该产品。例如，对于电子产品，应该有电路原理图，说明书中还要给出电子元器件参数；对于化工产品，要给出产品的生产条件、原料配方、工艺步骤，直至生产出产品,
 
23万失效专利，就是这样的技术。这些技术对企业掌握今后的发展方向同样具有参考价值，它可以避免重复性、低水平技术开发的发生，是最具有利用价值的。而且利用这些技术无需向任何人支付任何费用的；失效专利提供了大量有技术含量、市场价值的产品信息。我公司经过努力开发了这种融合了近20年来中国失效专利的技术光盘，将原本需要2000本书才能承载的技术资料融于一张光盘上，推向市场。
 
电 话：020-34063963  E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
传 真：020-84186058  联系人：李先生  杨先生
 
广州天天信息技术有限公司
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250749: marked as done (netcfg: /etc/host is missing basic IPv6 configuration)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 01:16:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line netcfg: /etc/host is missing basic IPv6 configuration
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2004 17:41:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 13 10:41:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tomts10.bellnexxia.net (tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net) [209.226.175.54] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BDRuN-00056m-00; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:41:15 -0700
Received: from toronto-hse-ppp3660354.sympatico.ca ([65.95.143.251])
  by tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net
  (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:41:07 -0400
From: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: /etc/network/interfaces - no loopback interface
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:41:08 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: netcfg
Version: 0.54

(not sure about the exact version of netcfg I installed with, but the 
issue occurred with both beta2 and beta3)

With both beta2 and beta3 I managed to obtain a system with 
no entry for the loopback interface in /etc/network/interfaces.

I went through the netcfg process of the installer. DHCP failed to obtain 
a connection, since it's pppoe, and I wound up punching in 192.168.0.1 
(or was it 127.0.0.1? I can't recall) and other dummy static information 
just to pass through the prompts. I then rebooted, and noticed that 
the /etc/network/interfaces file contained only:

# Used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8). See the interfaces(5) manpage or
# /usr/share/doc/ifupdown/examples for more information.

...but nothing more. That there was nothing present about my fake static 
connection I couldn't care less about, but the lack of an entry for the 
loopback interface is serious. Presumably "lo" isn't missing for 
everybody, or this would have been fixed ages ago, so I guess it must be 
a problem specific to how I handled the installer.

Thanks,
Christopher Martin

---
Received: (at 250749-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2004 23:16:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 24 16:16:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BSOgf-0002PN-00; Mon, 24 May 2004 16:16:54 -0700
Received: from galadriel.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.21] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BSOg9-0002aL-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 May 2004 01:16:22 +0200
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: netcfg: /etc/host is missing basic IPv6 configuration
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 01:16:21 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

I've been reliably informed on #debian-boot that this is fixed in netcfg 0.66.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#237120: Debian Installation Report

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Miroslav Suchý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-09 21:42]:
> Root Device: SATA
> Root Size/partition table:
> 80GiB splitted into 70 GiB (/) and 10GiB (swap)

Your installation report mentioned that you're using a machine with SATA
disks.  Since the last beta of debian-installer was released, a large
number of changes related to SATA have been made.  In particular, we now
ship a 2.4.26 kernel with (some) SATA support.  We're currently preparing a
new test release of debian-installer (release candidate 1), and we'd
appreciate it if you could try our daily image and tell us whether this
works.  This will give us some time to make important changes if so
requires before rc1 is released.  You can find current images at
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/

We'd appreciate it if you could test this image and tell us if the issues
you mentioned in your bug report have been dealt with, and in particular
whether your SATA disks are recognized and work.  You can either boot
normally (by pressing enter or typing "linux") and will get a 2.4.26 kernel
with SATA, or you can type "linux26" and get a 2.6 kernel; both should
work, and we'd appreciate feedback about both of them.  Thanks

You didn't report any problems with SATA last time.  Did you use the
drives in legalcy (parallel) mode or in SATA?

> I create 10GiB swap partition but installer create only 2GiB swap 
> partition. I fixed it: swapoff -a; mkswap -v1 /dev/hda2; swapon -a

Do you still see this problem?

> Additonaly after reboot was broken fonts - I choose czech language -
> during instalation was everything OK, but after reboot, there
> problem with some chars with accents (accented r, s and some
> others).

Some language related problems are fixed in the daily images, but I'm
not sure about Czech.  Can you check?

> I also find some problem, but I'm not sure if it's related to
> installer.  After installation I immediately upgrade to unstable and
> to kernel 2.6 from deb package. But lilo warn me that
> /proc/partitions points to non exist directory
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0 and replaced it with /dev/hda. And
> the new kernel panic when it try to mount root fs.

LILO should handle this correctly.  Can you check if this problem is
still there?

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243233: installation report (d-i 20040408)

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Bruno Majewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-11 18:28]:
> (0) Bravo for the use of kernel 2.4.25 and XF86 4.3: at least Debian 

The new images use 2.4.26 now.

Can you please get a new image from 
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and tell me which
of the issues you reported have been fixed.

> (1) my tv card, an ATI TV WONDER/VE was not detected, nor was the 
> related kernel module loaded.

Has this been fixed?

> (2) the PCMCIA kernel modules were still loaded. I had to remove those 
> two modules manually (pcmcia-cs & kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.25-1-386). 
> Considering new the installer is supposed to automatically detect hardware, 

This should be fixed; can you confirm?

> (3) Partitioning: because the installer gives you only two choices 
> (taking over the whole hard disk or letting you edit the partition table 
> manually), I had to go the manual route to make sure my FAT32 partition did 
> not get deleted.  I wonder if a third choice would not have been possible, 
> to let me keep my FAT32 partition and take over the rest automagically. 

Well, if you had a FAT partition and then free space, you'd get a 3rd
option saying "use the free disk space".

> (3.1)   the 4 options ("Finish partitioning and write changes to disk", 
> "Automatically partition a drive", "Undo changes to partitions" & 
> "Configure the Logical Volume Manager") should be with the two buttons at 
> the bottom ("Go back" & "Continue") and not be visually with the partition 
> table. In fact they should be *the bottom menu* that would somehow be like 
> this: "Go back", "Finish partitioning..." (the new "Continue"), 
> "Automatically...", "Undo..." and "Configure the...".  And there should be 
> a visual clue, a frame, a scrollable (sp?) list delimiting the partition 
> table.

I'll forward these comments to the author of the partitioning tool.

> (3.1.1) Pray tell, what do the little symbols (smiley, lightning) in that 
> screen do mean, exactly?

There's a help menu... but yes, I admit it's not very obvious what
they mean.

> (4) There should have been an explicit option to have the NIC 
> configured via DHCP (automatically) or via a static address (manually). We 

It tried DHCP automatically, and when that fails give you the option
to configure a static address.

> (6) After the initial reboot, during "part two" of the install, tasksel 
> asks me how I want to configure my machine. The only way to have just an 
> FTP & telnet server (maybe I should have used ssh...), I have to select 
> "conventional Unix server" and get Apache (& more?) in the process. What if 
> I do not want Apache et al and just want FTP & telnet/ssh servers? Why 
> can't I do a sub-selection?

The idea of taskel is to be very simple to use for new users.  If you
want tigther control over what is being installed, please use
apititude.

> (7) The "cdrom" and "audio" groups should have been correctly 
> configured by d-i so that the "normal user (s)" could hear music. Not 
> everyone would know about this (I knew this because of previous experiences 

This is done now.

> (8) the d-i, after detecting my hardware, should have detected that my 
> motherboard can initiate a full shutdown of the machine and should have 
> installed apmd. I had to do this manually for me just to have to type 
> "shutdown -h now" and have my machine power off by itself.

Do you know how to find out whether a machine has this capability?

> (9) In tasksel, I did not select a graphical DE because I wanted to 
> install KDE 3.2.1... Nonetheless, I feel that both read-edid and mdetect 
> should have been loaded and set up so that my subsequent set up of XF86 
> could have been fully automated.

Well, equally you could argue that debian-installer should not install
these packages, because they are not needed, e.g. on servers.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243233: installation report (d-i 20040408)

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Bruno Majewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-11 18:28]:
> (11)Configuring XF86 was painless due to the fact I had read-edid + 
> mdetect installed and rebooted afterwards, before installing XF86.  The 
> installer (or is it debconf?) made it possible. The only gripe I would have 
> is the lack, that I remember, of a "test" button to make sure the chosen 
> settings do look ok.  But if you do not have read-edid & mdetect installed, 
> ouch.

fabbione, any idea about this?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#234687: Boot fails on g5 desktop

[Mattias Wadenstein]

On Mon, 24 May 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:

> * Mattias Wadenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-25 08:09]:
> > Does not give any output after "opening display" with a string indicating
> > the graphics card referenced above.
>
> What's the status of G5 support now?

Unfortunately I can not check this, as we had to return the G5 to Apple
some time ago.

/Mattias Wadenstein


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250789: termwrap unloads the charset mapping in second-stage installation

[Recai Oktas]

Package: base-config
Version: 2.23
Severity: important
Tags: l10n, d-i

Hi,

After successfully finishing the first stage installation, I entered to 
base-config.  Everthing was fine, i.e. termwrap set the correct console 
font as indicated in languagechooser/languagelist (ter-916f/iso09 for 
Turkish), no problems with the debconf messages -- they were all 
displayed in Turkish.  But at the end of base-config, console settings 
were changed again, due to the following code in termwrap:

[...]

$@

case $ENCODING in

[...]

ISO-8859-9)
# Unload ISO-8859-9 charset mapping, by loading ISO-8859-1 
# instead
try_load_charset "$ENCODING" iso01 lat0-sun16

When I retested it, I modified the termwrap code so as to immediately 
exit after calling the base-config, that is:

[...]

$@

exit $?

case $ENCODING in

and I found the console as it should be.  I can work on a patch for this 
problem, but first I should figure out this behaviour.  Why does it need 
to unload the charset mapping at the end of termwrap?  Is it something 
related with the "base-config in first stage installation" facility? 

Regards,

P.S. This problem exist in all latest netinst snapshots (e.g. 20040519 - 
20040523).

-- 
roktas


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#238648: d-i beta3, modprobe tg3, netinst.iso

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Haiml, Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-18 08:17]:
> Machine: 

Your installation report mentioned that you're using a machine with SATA
disks.  Since the last beta of debian-installer was released, a large
number of changes related to SATA have been made.  In particular, we now
ship a 2.4.26 kernel with (some) SATA support.  We're currently preparing a
new test release of debian-installer (release candidate 1), and we'd
appreciate it if you could try our daily image and tell us whether this
works.  This will give us some time to make important changes if so
requires before rc1 is released.  You can find current images at
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/

We'd appreciate it if you could test this image and tell us if the issues
you mentioned in your bug report have been dealt with, and in particular
whether your SATA disks are recognized and work.  You can either boot
normally (by pressing enter or typing "linux") and will get a 2.4.26 kernel
with SATA, or you can type "linux26" and get a 2.6 kernel; both should
work, and we'd appreciate feedback about both of them.  Thanks

> d-i detects NIC and tries correct module tg3. However, "modprobe -v
> tg3" results in "no hardware found" with sarge-i386-netinst.iso
> (beta3).

Can you try the daily image and check if this works?  If not, can you
show me the output of the kernel when you load the tg3 module (this
will show what chip you have exactly).
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#230446: SATA support

[Martin Michlmayr]

Daniel,

Your installation report mentioned that you're using a machine with
SATA disks.  Since the last beta of debian-installer was released, a
large number of changes related to SATA have been made.  In
particular, we now ship a 2.4.26 kernel with (some) SATA support.
We're currently preparing a new test release of debian-installer
(release candidate 1), and we'd appreciate it if you could try our
daily image and tell us whether this works.  This will give us some
time to make important changes if so requires before rc1 is released.
You can find current images at
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/

We'd appreciate it if you could test this image and tell us if the
issues you mentioned in your bug report have been dealt with, and in
particular whether your SATA disks are recognized and work.  You can
either boot normally (by pressing enter or typing "linux") and will
get a 2.4.26 kernel with SATA, or you can type "linux26" and get a 2.6
kernel; both should work, and we'd appreciate feedback about both of
them.  Thanks
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#232315: installation-reports

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Rick Vander Kam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-11 15:56]:
> Root Device: IDE, on Intel 82801EB SATA controller, UDMA mode 5

Your installation report mentioned that you're using a machine with SATA
disks.  Since the last beta of debian-installer was released, a large
number of changes related to SATA have been made.  In particular, we now
ship a 2.4.26 kernel with (some) SATA support.  We're currently preparing a
new test release of debian-installer (release candidate 1), and we'd
appreciate it if you could try our daily image and tell us whether this
works.  This will give us some time to make important changes if so
requires before rc1 is released.  You can find current images at
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/

We'd appreciate it if you could test this image and tell us if the issues
you mentioned in your bug report have been dealt with, and in particular
whether your SATA disks are recognized and work.  You can either boot
normally (by pressing enter or typing "linux") and will get a 2.4.26 kernel
with SATA, or you can type "linux26" and get a 2.6 kernel; both should
work, and we'd appreciate feedback about both of them.  Thanks
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#234687: Boot fails on g5 desktop

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Mattias Wadenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-25 08:09]:
> Does not give any output after "opening display" with a string indicating
> the graphics card referenced above.

What's the status of G5 support now?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#239053: installation-reports

[Martin Michlmayr]

* José Mª Aragón Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-20 16:07]:
> /dev/hda5 > swap (512mb)
> and a windows partition on a sata disk

Your installation report mentioned that you're using a machine with SATA
disks.  Since the last beta of debian-installer was released, a large
number of changes related to SATA have been made.  In particular, we now
ship a 2.4.26 kernel with (some) SATA support.  We're currently preparing a
new test release of debian-installer (release candidate 1), and we'd
appreciate it if you could try our daily image and tell us whether this
works.  This will give us some time to make important changes if so
requires before rc1 is released.  You can find current images at
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/

We'd appreciate it if you could test this image and tell us if the issues
you mentioned in your bug report have been dealt with, and in particular
whether your SATA disks are recognized and work.  You can either boot
normally (by pressing enter or typing "linux") and will get a 2.4.26 kernel
with SATA, or you can type "linux26" and get a 2.6 kernel; both should
work, and we'd appreciate feedback about both of them.  Thanks

Did beta3 recognize this SATA disk with Windows?  I guess not.  Can
you check if the new daily image can see it?

> Install boot loader:[E]
> Reboot: [ ]
> [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
> 
> Comments/Problems:well the problems comes because i already have a grub
> installation on the hd , and when i select to install the grub of the live cd
> the installer simply blocks , also i would like to know the grub parameter to
> try to boot the debian from the gentoo installed grub(who is in a 100mbs
> partition /dev/hda2)

debian-installer should recognized other operating systems and make
proper menu entries for them when you install GRUB with
debian-installer.  You can now also specify normal device names, such
as /dev/hda2

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#239464: still not fixed

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Carsten Faltin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-18 21:42]:
> I wanted to install another i440BX box with the installer beta 4 and
> it installed again the k7 kernel.

Can you check a daily image from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/
and see if they work?

* Carsten Faltin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-22 22:02]:
> 00:0b.0 Unknown mass storage controller: CMD Technology Inc Silicon Image SiI 3112 
> SATARaid Controller (rev 02)

Your installation report mentioned that you're using a machine with SATA
disks.  Since the last beta of debian-installer was released, a large
number of changes related to SATA have been made.  In particular, we now
ship a 2.4.26 kernel with (some) SATA support.  We're currently preparing a
new test release of debian-installer (release candidate 1), and we'd
appreciate it if you could try our daily image and tell us whether this
works.  This will give us some time to make important changes if so
requires before rc1 is released.  You can find current images at
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/

We'd appreciate it if you could test this image and tell us if the issues
you mentioned in your bug report have been dealt with, and in particular
whether your SATA disks are recognized and work.  You can either boot
normally (by pressing enter or typing "linux") and will get a 2.4.26 kernel
with SATA, or you can type "linux26" and get a 2.6 kernel; both should
work, and we'd appreciate feedback about both of them.  Thanks

> ISSUE 2 - kbd-chooser
> I used the german language during install but the sort order is in
> english. Deutsch (gemran) is under G, should be under D.

I think this is a known issue.

> ISSUE 3 - bootloader
> After the Install hangs at 86% i tried to install a bootloader, but
> then always a base install started.

This is because the base installation was not completed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#242008: installation report with sarge and the new installer

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Thomas Borger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-04 11:31]:
> Config network: worked after I changed manually some configuration files of 
> wireless (/etc/pcmcia . . .)

What changed did you have to make in order to get it to work?  Can you
please try a new image from 
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and let me know if
it works without making any manual changes.

> Today the Debian system work fine with a new kernel 2.6.4-1. The soundcard 
> does not work
> Some sound modules are loaded but it can be possible that my sound card ist 

Have you ever used another version of Linux on your machine?  Did
audio work there?  Can you please paste the output of:
  lspci -n

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#240932: INSTALL REPORT

[Martin Michlmayr]

* William Lentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-29 15:36]:
> 1- "Load installer modules" problem...  After loading the installer
> modules during the initial install process, the system no longer
> recognized my CDROM drive.  I worked around the problem by running the
> install in expert mode and only loading installer modules that looked
> absolutely necessary.  Specifically, there were a bunch of
> hardware-specific IDE driver modules the installer wanted to load.  I

Can you please try a daily image from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/
and tell me whether this works?

> 2- After the install I kept getting the following error:
> Setting up noflushd (2.7.2-1) ...
> Starting No Flush Daemon: Error: Your kernel is configured with devfs,
> but devfs is not

This has been fixed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#241790: installation-reports

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Maxime GEORGE-BOURREAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-02 23:59]:
> 1. Initial boot screen doesn't display properly (many sort of shadow
> lines). But pressing the F1 key makes display looks correctly.

Strange, I've no idea why Knoppix would work but the others wouldn't.

> 2. I did base-config before reboot the computer. The cursor and the option selector 
> didn't show correcty.
> When I pressed UP key, the option selector disappears,
> when I pressed DOWN key, the option selector shows correctly.

Can you please try a daily image from 
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and let me know if
this is still there?

> 
> 3. After complete install, I need to perform each time I boot
> ifdown eth1
> and
> ifup eth1

Same here; this might be fixed, but I'm not sure.

> 4. I need to install kernel-image-2.6.3-k7 in order to have cpufreq
> (Not really a problem).

If you use d-i with the 2.6 kernel (boot with "linux26"), it should
install a 2.6 kernel.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243233: installation report (d-i 20040408)

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Bruno Majewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-11 18:28]:
> (5) Assuming grub and use a graphical splashscreen like lilo can, I am 
> surprised you did not make grub use one to make the boot process prettier. 
> If we want the "unwashed masses" to use Linux, we might was well make it 
> pretty. And that includes a graphical grub menu as well as using the 
> bootsplash kernel patch.  I should not have to patch & recompile my kernel 
> to make my machine not scream "geek!".

What's the status of having a version of GRUB in the archive which
displays a graphical boot screen?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Turkish keyboard bug again in 20040523 netinst snapshot

[Recai Oktas]

* Recai Oktas [2004-05-24 17:53:15+0300]
> Turkish keyboard is again in a broken state in netinst snapshot of 
> 20040523.  This bug (#247441) has been fixed in 2002.12.04dbs-39 of
> console-data, and there was in fact no such problem in the previous 
> snapshots I tested (i.e. 20040520 and _20040521).  I guess an old 
> version of console-keymaps-at udeb must have been used for this built.  
> Can someone confirm/fix this, just to make sure that Turkish users 
> don't experience the same beta4 keyboard bug while testing rc1?

20040523 netinst image downloaded from the following location, has not 
this problem:

  http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/current/

Anyway, I'll test the 20040524 daily.

-- 
roktas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PowerPC install on a powerbook G4

[Lakin Wecker]

Well I just tried the sid_d-i install images for today, May 24, 2004, and I 
must say that I am impressed, and grateful to all the folks who have been 
donating their time to this project.

This time it worked for everything except one thing:  I had to drop to a shell 
and udpkg -i .  I went back to the dhcp configuration and it 
went smoothly from there. 

The first suggestion I have is for yaboot-installer.   It found the two 
bootable partitions that I had, but it only listed the extremely long and 
undecipherable(for a newer user) /dev/ide/host0/.../lun0/part(2|3) names.  
Perhaps this list should include the partition names.  Which brings me to 
another point.   

Although I'm quite capable of partitioning the drives myself, I hate doing it.  
I'd much prefer to have a tool figure it out for me based on some heuristics.  
Having said that: I _love_ the guided partitioner.  So I used that again to 
partition the drive and it added the correct yaboot partition for me.  

Couldn't the partitioner and yaboot installer come up with a quick way for 
them to communicate about the correct bootstrap partition.  Perhaps 
automatically name the yaboot partition "bootstrap" which is what is 
recommended almost everywhere that I've seen.  Then the yaboot-installer 
could do a quick search for a bootable partition named "bootstrap" and 
default to this.  

The only other suggestion I have is for the partitioner.  When the user 
chooses "free space" for the automated partitioning, perhaps a quick search 
could be done for a useable swap partition which already exists and ask about 
using this.

This turned out to be a bit longer than I originally planned, but there it is.

Thanks again,

Lakin Wecker


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 250740

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 250740 + pending
Bug#250740: /etc/network/interfaces didn't include eth0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250763: installation report (d-i 20040522)

[Bruno Majewski]

Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Daily snapshot, from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040506/
uname -a: Linux debtst14 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 
GNU/Linux

Date: 2004.05.22-23
Method: Using the Sarge netinst ISO image
(http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040522/)
booted off the CD, ran the installer, completed via apt-get'ting 
remaining
packages via the repositories (ftp.debian.org)

Machine:
x86 "wintel" clone: Gigabyte GA-7VT600-P-L motherboard, with
   ASUS Radeon 9200SE 64MB AGP.
and
Adaptec AHA-2940/2940W PCI SCSI adapter (for tape backup)
The built-in SATA controller (part of the VT8237 southbridge) was 
not turned off.

Processor:
Duron 1.4 GHz, 266MHz FSB.
Memory:
256MB RAM DDR (PC3200)
Root Device:
EIDE (1 HD)
WDC WD400EB-00CPF0
Root Size/partition table:
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40019582464 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4865 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   1130410474348+   c  W95 FAT32 
(LBA)
/dev/hda213051368  514080   82  Linux swap
/dev/hda3   *1369486528089652+  83  Linux

Command (m for help): q
debtst14:~#
Output of lspci:
debtst14:~# lspci
pcilib: Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices
:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8377 [KT400/KT600 AGP] 
Host Bridge (rev 80)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 PCI Bridge
:00:0a.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AHA-2940/2940W / AIC-7871 
(rev 03)
:00:0c.0 Multimedia video controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Video 
Capture (rev 11)
:00:0c.1 Multimedia controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Audio 
Capture (rev 11)
:00:0f.0 RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 
3149 (rev 80)
:00:0f.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
:00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 
controller] (rev 81)
:00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 
controller] (rev 81)
:00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 
controller] (rev 81)
:00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 
controller] (rev 81)
:00:10.4 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 86)
:00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 ISA bridge [K8T800 
South]
:00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 60)
:00:13.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 
9200 SE] (rev 01)
:01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 
SE] (Secondary) (rev 01)
debtst14:~#

Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[ O ]
Configure network HW:   [ O ]
Config network: [ O ]
Detect CD:  [ O ]
Load installer modules: [ O ]
Detect hard drives: [ O ]
Partition hard drives:  [ did manually, to keep pre-existing FAT32 partition ]
Create file systems:[ did manually ]
Mount partitions:   [ did manually ]
Install base system:[ O ]
Install boot loader:[ O ]
Reboot: [ O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:

**  result of lspci -n:
debtst14:~# lspci -n
pcilib: Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices
:00:00.0 Class 0600: 1106:3189 (rev 80)
:00:01.0 Class 0604: 1106:b198
:00:0a.0 Class 0100: 9004:7178 (rev 03)
:00:0c.0 Class 0400: 109e:036e (rev 11)
:00:0c.1 Class 0480: 109e:0878 (rev 11)
:00:0f.0 Class 0104: 1106:3149 (rev 80)
:00:0f.1 Class 0101: 1106:0571 (rev 06)
:00:10.0 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 81)
:00:10.1 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 81)
:00:10.2 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 81)
:00:10.3 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 81)
:00:10.4 Class 0c03: 1106:3104 (rev 86)
:00:11.0 Class 0601: 1106:3227
:00:11.5 Class 0401: 1106:3059 (rev 60)
:00:13.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10)
:01:00.0 Class 0300: 1002:5964 (rev 01)
:01:00.1 Class 0380: 1002:5d44 (rev 01)
debtst14:~#
**  result of "cat /proc/pci":
debtst14:~# cat /proc/pci
PCI devices found:
  Bus  0, device   0, function  0:
Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8377 [KT400 AGP] Host 
Bridge (rev 128).
  Master Capable.  Latency=8.
  Pr

Bug#250284: Debian-Installer Beta 4 bug report

[Christian Perrier]

reassign 250284 partman
retitle 250284 Should warn when trying to create partitions with inadapted (too small) 
size for the filesystem
thanks

Quoting Michael Ahlers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> 
> | IIRC, this is fixed now
> 
> Outstanding.  :)
> 
> |>2. The partition editor doesn't check for minimum block device/partition
> |>size requirements for filesystem options.  Basically, it calculated a 20
> |>MB /tmp filesystem for my installation.  I prefer reiserfs, so I
> |>adjusted all partitions accordingly (knowing this would fail with /tmp
> |>since reiserfs requires in the neighborhood of 30 MB for the journal,
> |>AFAIK).  The failure was not very graceful.  A warning or an adjustment
> |>of the partitions would be very helpful here.
> |
> | I very recently changed the minimum size for the root file system from
> | 30MB to 70MB.
> |
> | You here suggest that 20MB for /tmp may be too small, right? What do
> | you mean by "not very graceful"?
> |
> | Which minimum size do you think would be enough? This seems tricky as
> | 20MB may be enough for an ext2 FS, but probably not for reiserfs as
> | you suggest.
> 
> Sorry for not being so clear--I wrote that report up in a big hurry.  :)
> 
> I'm not really suggesting increasing the minimum size for /tmp (though
> come to think if, it should probably be a little bigger) but it'd be
> helpful if the editor flagged impossible conditions such as this.  By
> not very graceful, I mean that the editor allowed me to create a
> partition that does not meet the minimum requirements as dictated by the
> filesystem I chose to use on it, and then bombed out later in the
> process.  That's a little ugly.  So basically, if I have a 20M partition
> and I tell the editor to make it reiserfs, it should tell me I've done
> something dumb and optimally, offer to recompute the partitions, all
> before I try to commit the changes.


You're right, such check should be made by partman. This means that it
needs to know, for each filesystem type, the minimum requirements.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#250284: Debian-Installer Beta 4 bug report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 250284 partman
Bug#250284: Debian-Installer Beta 4 bug report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.

> retitle 250284 Should warn when trying to create partitions with inadapted (too 
> small) size for the filesystem
Bug#250284: Debian-Installer Beta 4 bug report
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250758: Bits and pieces from an amd64 install

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Package: install
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

here are some bits and pieces I stumbled across while installing on amd64:

1. Anna tries to read /cdrom/dists/stable/Release even though its an
   unstable cd (adding dummy links to cd).
2. Debotstrap has no script for unstable (renaming sid to sarge).
3. Partitioning scheme unknown for this architecture (amd64 should use
   i386 DOS partitioning scheme).
4. Partman hangs on exit.
5. Partman fails to see partitions or do anything usefull. Even formating
   and mounting a partition manually doesn't help skipping partman
   (removing partman from cd).
6. debootstrap wants to install gcc-3.2-base (giving up and fixing it).

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-amd64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian installer rc1 translation status

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting George Papamichelakis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Anyway these are the files  (I have to go from the office now
> and you seem to have write  access ). :)

I commited everything. Greek should now be complete !



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250746: Finnish translation update for base-config

[Christian Perrier]

tags 250746 pending
thanks

Quoting Tapio Lehtonen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: base-config
> Version: 2.21
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch l10n
> 
> Translated file attached.

Commited. However, you have commit access to the CVS repository for
base-config on Alioth..:-)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#250746: Finnish translation update for base-config

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 250746 pending
Bug#250746: Finnish translation update for base-config
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Alpha installation

[sammyg]

Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I am trying to install testing on a Alpha system using netboot images 
(http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/d-i/images/daily/netboot/ ) . While 
running the partitioner it is complaining that aboot need /boot to be 
an ext2 file system. Even after creating /boot as ext2 i am still 
getting the same error message. Choosing to yes or no  also doesn't work.

If you want to have 1 large ext3 partition, during the partitioner 
create your 3 1 MB partitions at the end of your drive. Then create a .5 
MB partition and the start of the drive. Next delete the 3 1 MB 
partitions at the end of the drive. Create an ext3 partition at the 
start of the drive ?? MB or ?? GB minus the swap-space. Then create the 
swap-space. After delete the .5 MB at the start of the drive. Now you 
should have a .5 blank space at the start of the drive. a ext3 partition 
and a swap-space. finish the installation and after the aboot-installer 
fails go to the main-manu and select the skip aboot installer. goto vt2 
or boot from a rescue disk and type chroot /target OR mount /dev/??? as 
/ . type "swriteboot -c1  /dev/???  /boot/bootlx" where c is the 
partition number and /dev/??? is the dev name. DONT REBOOT. Now goto 
/etc and edit aboot.conf. "nano aboot.conf" change the first 
luncommented to "0:1/vmlinuz ro /initrd=initrd.img root=/dev/???"  where 
0"1 is going to be the "-flags 0" after you type "boot ???" at the SRM 
and the 1 is the partition number like /dev/hda1. Now reboot.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: amd64 DI kernel packages

[Frederik Schueler]

Hi,

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 02:14:48PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> I've added you to the project, so tyou can commit it yourself.

Thanks. committed.

Greetings
Frederik Schueler

-- 
ENOSIG


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: netcfg: /etc/host is missing basic IPv6 configuration

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 243543 -1
Bug#243543: /etc/network/interfaces - no loopback interface
Bug 243543 cloned as bug 250749.

> reassign -1 netcfg
Bug#250749: /etc/network/interfaces - no loopback interface
Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `netcfg'.

> retitle -1 netcfg: /etc/host is missing basic IPv6 configuration
Bug#250749: /etc/network/interfaces - no loopback interface
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250746: Finnish translation update for base-config

[Tapio Lehtonen]

Package: base-config
Version: 2.21
Severity: normal
Tags: patch l10n

Translated file attached.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages base-config depends on:
ii  adduser 3.53 Add and remove users and groups
ii  apt 0.5.25   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  aptitude0.2.14-3 curses-based apt frontend
ii  bsdutils1:2.12-3 Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite
ii  console-data2002.12.04dbs-38 Keymaps, fonts, charset maps, fall
ii  console-tools   1:0.2.3dbs-52Linux console and font utilities
ii  debconf 1.4.25   Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils 2.8.2Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  gettext-base0.14.1-2 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  passwd  1:4.0.3-28.1 Change and administer password and

-- debconf information excluded
# translation of fi.po to Finnish
# Base-config translation
# Copyright (C) 2003 Software in the Public Interest
# This file is distributed under the same license as the base-config package.
# Translators, please read /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
# Tommi Vainikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2003.
# Tapio Lehtonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
# 
# 
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: base-config\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2004-05-24 12:00-0600\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-05-24 21:26+0300\n"
"Last-Translator: Tapio Lehtonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Finnish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit"

#: ../lib/menu/pkgsel:23
msgid "dselect - old package selector (experts only)"
msgstr "dselect - vanha paketinvalitsin (vain asiantuntijoille)"

#: ../lib/menu/pkgsel:26
msgid "aptitude - pick tasks or drill down to individual packages"
msgstr "aptitude - valitse asennettavaksi tehtÃvià tai yksittÃisià 
asennuspaketteja"

#: ../lib/menu/pkgsel:29
msgid "tasksel - quickly choose from predefined collections of software"
msgstr "tasksel - valitse ennalta mÃÃritellyistà ohjelmistokokoelmista"

#: ../lib/menu/pkgsel:36
msgid "nothing - you may manually run apt-get or any of the above later"
msgstr "ei mitÃÃn - voit kÃynnistÃà itse apt-get:n tai kÃyttÃà edellà 
mainittuja "
"myÃhemmin"

#: ../lib/menu/shell:4
msgid "Type 'exit' to return to base-config."
msgstr "Kirjoittamalla \"exit\" palataan base-config:iin."

#: ../apt-setup:74
msgid "enter information manually, "
msgstr "syÃtà tiedot kÃsin, "

#: ../apt-setup:152
msgid "Scanning CD, this will take a minute."
msgstr "SilmÃillÃÃn nopeasti romppua, tÃmà kestÃà hetken."

#. Several notes for translators:
#. * The singular form is only there to make use of plural forms;
#. * If package count is 0, a separate error message should be displayed.
#. * This sentence is part of a longer paragraph, full stop is omitted here.
#. * "${PACKAGE_COUNT}" must not be translated.
#: ../apt-setup:223
#, sh-format
msgid ""
"The Debian package management tool, apt, is now configured, and can install "
"${PACKAGE_COUNT} package"
"The Debian package management tool, apt, is now configured, and can install "
"${PACKAGE_COUNT} packages"
msgstr "Debianin paketinhallintatyÃkalun apt:in asetukset on nyt tehty, ja se voi "
"asentaa ${PACKAGE_COUNT} ohjelmapakettia."

#: ../apt-setup:271
msgid ""
"You probably used a CD to install the Debian base system, but it is not "
"currently in the drive. You should probably just insert it and select \"cdrom"
"\"."
msgstr ""
"Luultavasti kÃytit romppua Debianin perusjÃrjestelmÃn asennukseen, mutta "
"romppu ei ole nyt asemassa. Luultavimmin sinun pitÃisi pistÃÃ romppu asemaan "
"ja valita \"cdrom\"."

#: ../apt-setup:484
msgid "Testing apt sources..."
msgstr "Kokeillaan apt-lÃhteità ..."

#: ../apt-setup:554 ../apt-setup:629
msgid "Testing apt sources ..."
msgstr "Kokeillaan apt-lÃhteità ..."

#: ../base-config:31
msgid "Configuring the base system..."
msgstr "TehdÃÃn perusjÃrjestelmÃn asetukset..."

#. Update available file; tasksel and dselect need it later.
#. (but first, get the configuration from /etc/apt/apt.conf)
#. Translators DO NOT TRANSLATE "available", this is the file name!
#: ../lib/menu/apt-setup:23
msgid "Updating \"available\" file..."
msgstr "PÃivitetÃÃn \"available\"-tiedosto"

#~ msgid "enter information manually"
#~ msgstr "syÃtà tiedot kÃsin"

#~ msgid "Debian System Configuration"
#~ msgstr "Debian-jÃrjestelmÃn asetukset"

#~ msgid "Apt Configuration"
#~ msgstr "Apt-asetukset"

#~ msgid "Time Zone Configuration"
#~ msgstr "AikavyÃhykeasetukset"

Bug#250740: /etc/network/interfaces didn't include eth0

[Ognyan Kulev]

Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040523/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux roller.fmi.uni-sofia.bg 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 
16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-05-24
Method: netinst.iso

Machine:
Processor: Pentium III 2x933
Memory: 256M
Root Device: IDE, 30G
Root Size/partition table:  / on 20G, swap on 512M
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C693A/694x [Apollo 
PRO133x] (rev c4)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C598/694x [Apollo 
MVP3/Pro133x AGP]
:00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super 
South] (rev 40)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 
controller] (rev 16)
:00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 
controller] (rev 16)
:00:07.4 SMBus: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] 
(rev 40)
:00:0b.0 Multimedia audio controller: C-Media Electronics Inc CM8738 
(rev 10)
:00:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon 
RV100 QY [Radeon 7000/VE]

:00:00.0 Class 0600: 1106:0691 (rev c4)
:00:01.0 Class 0604: 1106:8598
:00:07.0 Class 0601: 1106:0686 (rev 40)
:00:07.1 Class 0101: 1106:0571 (rev 06)
:00:07.2 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 16)
:00:07.3 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 16)
:00:07.4 Class 0c05: 1106:3057 (rev 40)
:00:0b.0 Class 0401: 13f6:0111 (rev 10)
:00:0c.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10)
:01:00.0 Class 0300: 1002:5159
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
There was one problem.  My network card (RealTek 8139C) was recognized 
during 1st stage (module 8139too is loaded), I entered IP, etc. 
ifconfig showed configured eth0.  After reboot module 8139too was loaded 
but eth0 was not configured.  There wasn't any configuration for eth0 in 
/etc/network/interfaces.  There was configuration only for lo.

Install logs and other status info is available in 
/var/log/debian-installer/.
Once you have filled out this report, mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250324: acknowledged by developer (Bug#250324: fixed in ddetect 0.97)

[Geert Stappers]

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:33:20AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #250324: gives an error if there is no CD drive,
> which was filed against the hw-detect package.
  
> Description: 
>  archdetect - Hardware architect detector (udeb)
>  ethdetect  - Detect network hardware and load kernel drivers for it (udeb)
>  hw-detect  - Detect hardware and load kernel drivers for it (udeb)
>  hw-detect-full - Detect hardware and load kernel drivers for it (full version) 
> (udeb)
> Closes: 250324
> Changes: 
>  ddetect (0.97) unstable; urgency=low

>  - Ignore errors loading the ide-cd module, which can happen
>on at least sun hardware if the system has no IDE CD drive.
>Closes: #250324

Hello D.I.S.T.,

As submitter of #250324 I want to clarify the bugreport.

The Sun hardware I use, Ultra 5, does have a IDE CD drive.

My initial report should been read as

  I'm doing a netboot,
  no need to pop-up a missing CD drive error


The abstract of my additional information to bugreport is

  The Sun has a CD ROM drive, Increase severity.



This does _not_ match

   - Ignore errors loading the ide-cd module, which can happen
 on at least sun hardware if the system has no IDE CD drive.



So I think it needs an other test run by me.

When will the new ddetect available in netboot image for Sparc64?


Cheers
Geert Stappers


pgpoTWBZiJSyo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#250735: bug dbootstrap

[Paulo Palmeira]

Package: boot-floppies
Version:  Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 "Woody" - Official i386 Binary-1 CD   
 flavor:ide-pci
  architecture:  i386
  model: 
  memory:256MB
  scsi:  nome
  cd-rom:   ATAPI SANSUNG see>
  network card:  via-hine
  pcmcia:
problems in dboostrap
thanks
Paulo Palmeira






dbg_log.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Bug#250728: debian installer

[Mbosowo I Sampson]

Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta4 50MB businesscard size
uname -a: Linux avalon 2.6.6 #5 Fri May 21 16:40:35 EDT 2004 i686 
GNU/Linux

Date: 5/18/04 
Method: Used the business card 50MB image for a network install.  booting 
from my CDrom. IP:24.191.53.191
forgot which mirror I used.

Machine: Homebrew machine. ECS K7S5A motherboard,
Processor: AMD Athalon 
Memory: 256MB Generic DDR 
Root Device: IDE = /dev/hdb, Maxtor harddrive 
Root Size/partition table:
/dev/hdb2 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
/dev/hdb3 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
/dev/hdb6 on /home type ext3 (rw)
usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw


Output of lspci:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 735 Host (rev 
01)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] Virtual 
PCI-to-PCI bridge (AGP)
:00:02.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS85C503/5513 
(LPC Bridge)
:00:02.1 SMBus: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]: Unknown device 0016
:00:02.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 
Controller (rev 07)
:00:02.3 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 
Controller (rev 07)
:00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] 
(rev d0)
:00:02.6 Modem: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] AC'97 Modem 
Controller (rev a0)
:00:03.0 Ethernet controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS900 
PCI Fast Ethernet (rev 90)
:00:0b.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 
(rev 07)
:00:0b.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game 
Port (rev 07)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV100 
QY [Radeon 7000/VE]

Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[E]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
Initially i tried to install 'unstable', but it could not install the base 
system for some reason. I received the following error

Error processing Apt-utils
I then went into a shell to see what was going on, and i saw the following 
error messages:

/target/dev/pts No such file or directory
/target/dev/shm No such file or directory
/target/proc/bus/usb Invalid
When i switched to'testing' it worked fine. but some of the ftp servers i 
tried hung when attempting to connect.
ftp.stealth.net
ftp.lug.udel.edu
and a copule of others I forgot to write down.

one suggestion. on the screen where it is attepting to connect and 
download packages, you should print a message telling the user what to do 
if it hangs. The first time it hung I made the mistake of canceling the 
install and restartin from the beginning.  The second time I tried ^C. 
There shouldn't be any trial and error 
installing the sytem.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: amd64 DI kernel packages

[Joey Hess]

Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Please add it to the repository. If I could have commit access too, this
> would be great, since we have just begun real work on the DI port.
> My alioth login is fschueler-guest.

I've added you to the project, so tyou can commit it yourself.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Turkish keyboard bug again in 20040523 netinst snapshot

[Joey Hess]

Recai Oktas wrote:
> Turkish keyboard is again in a broken state in netinst snapshot of 
> 20040523.  This bug (#247441) has been fixed in 2002.12.04dbs-39 of
> console-data, and there was in fact no such problem in the previous 
> snapshots I tested (i.e. 20040520 and _20040521).  I guess an old 
> version of console-keymaps-at udeb must have been used for this built.  
> Can someone confirm/fix this, just to make sure that Turkish users 
> don't experience the same beta4 keyboard bug while testing rc1?

Version -39 of console-keymaps-at is in testing and unstable, so it
should use used for all images now.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

anna_0.064_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
anna_0.064.dsc
  to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.064.dsc
anna_0.064.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.064.tar.gz
anna_0.064_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.064_i386.udeb
load-installer_0.064_all.udeb
  to pool/main/a/anna/load-installer_0.064_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian installer rc1 translation status

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting George Papamichelakis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> the account name is stepgr-guest (and yes I informed him )

 I will validate you for commit access to the d-i repository (as well
as base-config and tasksel)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of anna_0.064_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

anna_0.064_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  anna_0.064.dsc
  anna_0.064.tar.gz
  load-installer_0.064_all.udeb
  anna_0.064_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of tasksel 1.52

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 247928 + fixed
Bug#247928: [INTL:tr] Fixes for the Turkish task
Tags were: pending l10n patch
Tags added: fixed

> tag 249344 + fixed
Bug#249344: Debian Installation Report
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian installer rc1 translation status

[George Papamichelakis]

Anyway these are the files  (I have to go from the office now
and you seem to have write  access ). :)
George
Christian Perrier wrote:
As of 12:46 UTC 5/24:
23 complete languages  100%
   Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, German, Spanish, Basque, Finnish, French
   Hungarian, Indonesian, Japanese, Lithuanian 
   Norwegian Bokmal, Norwegian Nynorsk, Polish, Brazilian Portuguese
   Romanian, Russian, Slovak, Turkish, Ukrainian, Simplified Chinese
   Traditional Chinese
 9 nearly complete 90%-99%
   Dutch (5 strings missing !), Korean (6 strings missing !)
   Albanian, Catalan
   Portuguese, Italian, Greek, Hebrew, Swedish
 5 partial 50%-89%
   Slovenian, Welsh, Arabic, Bosnian, Galician
 1 very partial10%-49%
   Vietnamese


 




po.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Bug#250717:

[Jaz Brown]

Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Downloaded on 23 May 2004 from  

uname -a: (Can't boot the installed Debian)
Date: 24 May 2004
Method: Booted off the above CD ("110 MB CD image, with Debian base"  
for i386) and installed only from that CD.

Machine: Compaq DeskPro EP/SB Series (model 6350?)
Processor: Pentium II, 350 MHz
Memory: 256 MB
Root Device: IDE 40 GB (Maxtor 6Y040L0) as /dev/hdc
Root Size/partition table:
/dev/hda is a 4 GB IDE drive (Fujitsu MPC3043AT) with an existing  
installation of Slackware Linux 9.1:
/dev/hda1 is a 512 MB swap partition for Slackware
/dev/hda2 is a 3.5 GB reiserfs partition, mounted at / for slackware
/dev/hdc is the 40 GB IDE drive (Maxtor 6Y040L0) which is brand new and  
just installed
/dev/hdc1 was set up to be a 512 MB swap partition for Debian
/dev/hdc2 was set up to be a 4 GB ext3 partition, mounted at /, for  
Debian
/dev/hdc contains 35 GB in unallocated free space.
Output of lspci: (executed from booting the computer with Slackware)
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host  
bridge (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge  
(rev 03)
00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100]  
(rev 02)
00:10.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100]  
(rev 01)
00:14.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
00:14.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
00:14.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
00:14.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G200 AGP  
(rev 01)

Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[E]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
Installation proceeded normally up until the point of "Installing GRUB  
boot loader", with the message "Looking for other operating systems..."  
and the progress bar at 16%. At this point the computer did nothing  
further. After 10 minutes, with the same message still displayed and  
the progress bar still at 16%, I gave up.

A second attempt to install resulted in exactly the same problem.
For a third attempt, I booted off the CD and gave the command "expert"  
rather than just pressing Return. When given the option of installing a  
kernel, I chose the 2.4.25 kernel. When it came to the boot loader, I  
decided to give LILO a go instead of GRUB. When "Installing LILO..."  
with the message "Creating lilo.conf" and the progress bar at 25%,  
installation did not proceed any further. Eventually I gave up and  
rebooted into Slackware.

As described above, I have two hard drives installed. The primary  
master is the 4 GB drive with an existing, working installation of  
Slackware. I wanted to install Debian onto a newly installed 40 GB  
drive, connected as the secondary master. The cdrom was the secondary  
slave.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

netcfg_0.66_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.66_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.66_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.66_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.66_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.66.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.66.dsc
netcfg_0.66.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.66.tar.gz
netcfg_0.66_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.66_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#249937: installation-reports: Failed to install on x86 with d-i beta4 -- Several problems

[Per Olofsson]

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 17:09 +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> Yes, this should be fixed. But there seems to be a bug in cdebconf. I
> tried to do "db_fget hw-detect/start_pcmcia seen" and it always
> returns false. I wrote a test script then and tried some different
> questions, and they are never reported to be seen, even though I have
> answered them.

Hmm, sorry, it's apparently not a bug. I found #229648 where it is
explained. So I should probably just db_fset the question to seen
after it has been asked.

-- 
Pelle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: amd64 DI kernel packages

[Frederik Schueler]

Hi,

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:41:48AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> > It builds cleanly with the generic amd64 2.6.6 kernel-image found on
> > alioth[1]. Compiled udebs are there[2] too, used in a preliminary
> > installer[3].
> 
> What should we do with this? We can add it to svn, but not to the debian
> archive of course. I can give amd64 workers svn commit access..

Please add it to the repository. If I could have commit access too, this
would be great, since we have just begun real work on the DI port.
My alioth login is fschueler-guest.

Thanks
Frederik Schueler

-- 
ENOSIG


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250324: marked as done (gives an error if there is no CD drive)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2004 11:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250324: fixed in ddetect 0.97
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2004 06:40:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 21 23:40:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BRQAw-0002zB-00; Fri, 21 May 2004 23:40:07 -0700
Received: from localhost (tw89.gst.stappers.nl [172.24.0.18])
by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA481800
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 May 2004 08:39:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D16F270AE; Sat, 22 May 2004 08:40:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 08:40:43 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: install on Sun Ultra 5
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers AT tw89)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-sparc/beta4/images/sparc32/netboot/boot.img
downloaded may 21th 2004
uname -a: Linux tw89 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Sat Apr 24 01:43:10 EDT 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 08:28:12 +0200
Method: network install, "boot net", http://ftp.nl.debian.org, not
proxied
Machine: Sun Ultra 5
Processor: Ultra Sparc 275Mhz
Memory: 128Mb
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table:
Disk /dev/hda (Sun disk label): 15 heads, 63 sectors, 8894 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 945 * 512 bytes

   Device FlagStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1 0  2703   1277167+   1  Boot
/dev/hda2  2703  8519   2748060   83  Linux native
/dev/hda3 0  8894   42024155  Whole disk
/dev/hda4  8519  8894177187+  82  Linux swap

Output of lspci and lspci -n:

pcilib: Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Ultra IIi
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Simba Advanced PCI Bridge 
(rev 11)
:00:01.1 PCI bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Simba Advanced PCI Bridge 
(rev 11)
:01:01.0 Bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. EBUS (rev 01)
:01:01.1 Ethernet controller: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Happy Meal (rev 01)
:01:02.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT 
[Mach64 GT] (rev 9a)
:01:03.0 IDE interface: CMD Technology Inc PCI0646 (rev 03)
pcilib: Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices
:00:00.0 Class 0600: 108e:a000
:00:01.0 Class 0604: 108e:5000 (rev 11)
:00:01.1 Class 0604: 108e:5000 (rev 11)
:01:01.0 Class 0680: 108e:1000 (rev 01)
:01:01.1 Class 0200: 108e:1001 (rev 01)
:01:02.0 Class 0300: 1002:4754 (rev 9a)
:01:03.0 Class 0101: 1095:0646 (rev 03)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [E]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]

Comments/Problems:


It was a netboot install,
the CD detect complained that there was no CD-ROM,
I had to acknowledge the "error"..


After all a succesfull installation.

Thanks


Cheers
Geert Stappers

---
Received: (at 250324-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2004 15:23:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 24 08:23:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BSHId-0008IU-00; Mon, 24 May 2004 08:23:35 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BSHCK-0002Bt-00; Mon, 24 May 2004 11:17:04 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <[

Bug#250710: installation-reports

[Massimiliano La Gala]

Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
uname -a: 
Date: <24/05/2004 16:30>
Method: 

Machine: 
Processor:celeron 600
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: 
Root Size/partition table: not already parted in the installer
Output of lspci: /bin/sh: lspci: not found
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [E]
Config network: [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:[ ]
Mount partitions:   [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:My PCMCIA NE2k-compatible ethernet card was not found 
and not configured.
i've already used it in linux with debian woody and knoppix.


it was unsucessfull  :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ddetect override disparity

[Debian Installer]

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

hw-detect-full_0.97_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says 
optional.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ddetect_0.97_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
archdetect_0.97_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.97_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.97.dsc
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.97.dsc
ddetect_0.97.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.97.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.97_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.97_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.97_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect-full_0.97_all.udeb
hw-detect_0.97_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect_0.97_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 250324 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of netcfg_0.66_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

netcfg_0.66_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  netcfg_0.66.dsc
  netcfg_0.66.tar.gz
  netcfg_0.66_i386.udeb
  netcfg-dhcp_0.66_i386.udeb
  netcfg-static_0.66_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: debian boot CDs & G5

[Sven Luther]

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:19:47PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:54:52AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> > Colin Watson writes:
> > > It's not cheap at all.
> > 
> > As it stands, it's the price to pay for supporting the major flagships
> > of the PowerPC architecture out of the box.
> 
> Is the -g5 kernel at least compatible with the -power4 modules? (On the
> face of it, it seems that it should be, with the exception of the extra
> serial modules on -g5 which presumably we don't want to use anyway.) In
> that case, we could save a fair bit of space by shipping both kernels
> but only one set of modules, and somehow educating d-i about this.

The main problem is that it would be preferable for the serial driver to
be builtin on power4, so you can get an early serial console.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of ddetect_0.97_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

ddetect_0.97_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ddetect_0.97.dsc
  ddetect_0.97.tar.gz
  hw-detect_0.97_all.udeb
  ethdetect_0.97_all.udeb
  hw-detect-full_0.97_all.udeb
  archdetect_0.97_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#249937: installation-reports: Failed to install on x86 with d-i beta4 -- Several problems

[Per Olofsson]

On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 19:54 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > And another (small) problem: I don't have PCMCIA, but I don't
> > specify it as a boot parameter because of length constraints as you
> > indicated in your reply.  Hence d-i asks whether it should start
> > PCMCIA (claiming that those devices are present).  I answered "no",
> > but then later on, it asked it again, twice.
> 
> Per?

Yes, this should be fixed. But there seems to be a bug in cdebconf. I
tried to do "db_fget hw-detect/start_pcmcia seen" and it always
returns false. I wrote a test script then and tried some different
questions, and they are never reported to be seen, even though I have
answered them.

(BTW, please CC me in situations like this as I don't read all of the
messages on -boot)

-- 
Pelle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian installer rc1 translation status

[George Papamichelakis]

Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting George Papamichelakis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 

I want write access for commiting changes in .po  files for 
debian-installer . I already
have an account in alioth . what should I do ?
   

Give me this account name. I suppose you coordinate with
Konstantinos...

 

the account name is stepgr-guest (and yes I informed him )
George
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Turkish keyboard bug again in 20040523 netinst snapshot

[Recai Oktas]

Hi,

Turkish keyboard is again in a broken state in netinst snapshot of 
20040523.  This bug (#247441) has been fixed in 2002.12.04dbs-39 of
console-data, and there was in fact no such problem in the previous 
snapshots I tested (i.e. 20040520 and _20040521).  I guess an old 
version of console-keymaps-at udeb must have been used for this built.  
Can someone confirm/fix this, just to make sure that Turkish users 
don't experience the same beta4 keyboard bug while testing rc1?

Regards,

-- 
roktas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian installer rc1 translation status

[George Papamichelakis]

Christian Perrier wrote:
As of 08:45 UTC 5/22:
14 complete languages  100%
   Czech, Danish, Basque, Finnish, French, Japanese, Lithuanian 
   Norwegian Nynorsk, Polish, Brazilian Portuguese, Slovak, Turkish
   Ukrainian, Simplified Chinese
16 nearly complete 90%-99%
 7 partial 50%-89%
 1 very partial10%-49%

79,81% in total

 

I want write access for commiting changes in .po  files for 
debian-installer . I already
have an account in alioth . what should I do ?

George
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250625: Some minor problems when installing a swedish system.

[Christian Perrier]

reassign 250625 languagechooser
retitle 250625 Invalid locale for Swedish (Sweden)
thanks

Quoting Tor-björn Claesson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> Whe installing a swedish system, an us keymap is selected by default for X11, but 
> the layout "se"
> should be used.
> 
> The default locale didn't work. sv_SE ISO-8859-1 does.
> perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
>   LANGUAGE = (unset),
>   LC_ALL = (unset),
>   LANG = "sv_SE.UTF-8"
> are supported and installed on your system.
> perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").

Uh, that's strange : the sv_SE.UTF-8 is among the
/usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED locales list

Denis, if you still have some time

Processed: Re: Bug#250625: Some minor problems when installing a swedish system.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 250625 languagechooser
Bug#250625: Some minor problems when installing a swedish system.
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `languagechooser'.

> retitle 250625 Invalid locale for Swedish (Sweden)
Bug#250625: Some minor problems when installing a swedish system.
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian installer rc1 translation status

[Christian Perrier]

As of 12:46 UTC 5/24:
 
 23 complete languages  100%
Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, German, Spanish, Basque, Finnish, French
Hungarian, Indonesian, Japanese, Lithuanian 
Norwegian Bokmal, Norwegian Nynorsk, Polish, Brazilian Portuguese
Romanian, Russian, Slovak, Turkish, Ukrainian, Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
  9 nearly complete 90%-99%
Dutch (5 strings missing !), Korean (6 strings missing !)
Albanian, Catalan
Portuguese, Italian, Greek, Hebrew, Swedish
  5 partial 50%-89%
Slovenian, Welsh, Arabic, Bosnian, Galician
  1 very partial10%-49%
Vietnamese



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian installer rc1 translation status

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting George Papamichelakis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> I want write access for commiting changes in .po  files for 
> debian-installer . I already
> have an account in alioth . what should I do ?

Give me this account name. I suppose you coordinate with
Konstantinos...



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: udebs to testing

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > 
> > > grub-installeri3860.48
> > 
> > Seppy found a typo in grub-installer templates. I've fixed it as well
> > as un fuzzy the translations and will commit this very soon.
> > 
> > If we want it to disappear, we need another upload. Do you think I can
> > make one and have a change it does in rc1?
> 
> Getting a template change in will be no problem. We still need to get
> all the translation updates in, after all.

This was a typo ("parrtition") so I managed to correct it and unfuzzy
all translations.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#249633: installation-reports i386 netinst expert26 problem with libata install

[Anders Lennartsson]

On Thu, 2004-05-20, at 20:12:23 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Anders Lennartsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-20 21:05]:
> > Hi and thanks for your answer. FYI I sent the stuff you asked for to
> > the bug system only.
> 
> Hmm, it _should_ load the right module.  Can you test an image from
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and tell me if it
> doesn't load the module directly?  If it does not load the module, can
> you open a shell and check in /proc/modules which modules have been
> loaded.  Maybe it loads the ata_piix module, but not the sd_mod
> module... or maybe not even ata_piix.

Now tested with i386 netinstall image from 20040523, directly from gluck.

Booted with expert26, and ran all the way to partitioning disks.
Directly into the partitioning menu, the system didn't recognize my
SATA-disk, only my PATA disk. 

Out into a shell, where the following was reported:

by uname -a:

Linux lie 2.6.5-1-386 #2 Fri Apr 30 20:13:30 EST 2004 i686 unknown

by lsmod:

Module  Size  Used byNot tainted
xfs   513720   0 
reiserfs  197616   0 
ext3  103720   0 
jbd54168   1 ext3
vfat   14208   1 
fat41792   1 vfat
3c59x  36392   0 
e1000  75140   0 
sd_mod 19840   0 
isofs  32312   1 
ide_cd 37636   1 
cdrom  36640   1 ide_cd
ide_disk   16768   0 
ide_generic 1536   0 
pdc202xx_new   10012   1 
aec62xx10012   0 
alim15x3   11276   0 
amd74xx13212   0 
atiixp  8344   0 
cmd64x 11548   0 
cs5520  6280   0 
cs5530  6664   0 
cy82c6934868   0 
generic 4224   0 
hpt34x  5632   0 
hpt366 19652   0 
ns87415 4936   0 
opti621 4740   0 
pdc202xx_old   15388   0 
piix   12576   1 
rz1000  3200   0 
sc1200  8456   0 
serverworks12308   0 
siimage12900   0 
sis551315240   0 
slc90e668200   0 
triflex 5380   0 
trm290  4996   0 
via82cxxx  13084   0 
floppy 55252   1 
usb_storage58688   0 
scsi_mod  111692   2 sd_mod,usb_storage
ide_core  134752  29 
ide_cd,ide_disk,ide_generic,pdc202xx_new,aec62xx,alim15x3,amd74xx,atiixp,cmd64x,cs5520,cs5530,cy82c693,generic,hpt34x,hpt366,ns87415,opti621,pdc202xx_old,piix,rz1000,sc1200,serverworks,siimage,sis5513,slc90e66,triflex,trm290,via82cxxx,usb_storage
usbserial  27376   0 
hid29632   0 
usbkbd  6784   0 
ehci_hcd   25476   0 
uhci_hcd   29072   0 
usbcore93788   8 usb_storage,usbserial,hid,usbkbd,ehci_hcd,uhci_hcd
fbcon  26564   0 
font8576   1 fbcon
vga16fb12424   2 
vgastate8448   1 vga16fb
cfbcopyarea 3840   1 vga16fb
cfbimgblt   3200   1 vga16fb
cfbfillrect 3712   1 vga16fb
unix   25776   6 

Thus, no libata nor ata_piix, although sd_mod is there.

After modprobing libata and returning to the partitioning menu, no
scsi disk appeared. But a new try with manually modprobing ata_piix
gave results. (And back in partitioning I could select a partition and
apparently choose filsystem correctly, but I didn't yet proceed with
the install beyond this point.)


I'm thinking about the possibility that bios-settings are involved in
the choice of modules to load. I think that I had to select enhanced
mode on SATA only and not both SATA and PATA, because then the kernels
of february or so would hang.  Now I have only tried this mode and not
made any changes.



BTW, this is not really related but there were several annoying
questions asking me if I wanted to turn on PCMCIA-support, something
which there is no hardware support for. I noticed the same question on
another machine during the weekend, so this issue is not limited to
this hardware.


Anders Lennartsson


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: amd64 DI kernel packages

[Joey Hess]

Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Find attached the svn diff for a linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6 package.
> 
> The modules are already adapted, based on those found in the i386-2.6 DI
> package. Amd64 has only minimal ISA support, thus a lot of old modules had 
> to be removed.
> 
> It builds cleanly with the generic amd64 2.6.6 kernel-image found on
> alioth[1]. Compiled udebs are there[2] too, used in a preliminary
> installer[3].

What should we do with this? We can add it to svn, but not to the debian
archive of course. I can give amd64 workers svn commit access..

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#250508: bug with lvm.

[Joey Hess]

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gordon Heydon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-23 22:58]:
> > I managered to work thru the partitioning of the disk to tell it was
> > going to be set up as a lvm, and now pvcreate is being run. Next I ran
> > the lvmcfg and create firstly the volume group and next the 5 logical
> > volumes for /, /boot, /usr. /var, and /home
> 
> / on LVM is currently not supported.

I've seen a lot of people try this. Could we add a quick and temporary
finish.d script to check for this and give a warning?

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: udebs to testing

[Joey Hess]

Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 
> > grub-installer  i3860.48
> 
> Seppy found a typo in grub-installer templates. I've fixed it as well
> as un fuzzy the translations and will commit this very soon.
> 
> If we want it to disappear, we need another upload. Do you think I can
> make one and have a change it does in rc1?

Getting a template change in will be no problem. We still need to get
all the translation updates in, after all.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#250677: debian-installer: CDrom detection fails on Compqa Prof. WS 5100

[Finn-Arne Johansen]

Package: debian-installer
Severity: important

This is a dual PentiumII 333MHz, with 2xscsi-discs and sym53c875, and a
triflex(?) ide controller with a matshita CR585 (Creative CDROM)

if I try to manually mount the cdrom with the command
 mount /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /cdrom
I get segfault, but if i try without a cdrom inserted, I nothing wrong happens.

see http://bugs.skolelinux.no/show_bug.cgi?id=731 for more info

a workaround: 
Pressing Alt+F2  and loading ide-detect and ide-cd before choosing language
solves the problem, because then the other ide-modules fails to load. 

It's a bit anoying to ignore the error messages that comes up 10-15 times, but
it works. 



-- System Information:
Debian Release: Skolelinux RC2 (d-i beta4?)
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-386


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250674: Installation report: i386 sid on second harddisk

[Herbert Kaminski]

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-businesscard.iso 22-May-2004 14:40  50.0M 
from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/current/ ,
downloaded 23-MAY-2004 18:30
uname -a: Linux alfred 2.6.6-1-k7 #1 Wed May 12 18:19:40 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 23-MAY-2004 22:00
Method: boot from CD, select 'unstable', packages from 
ftp.de.debian.org with local proxy

Machine: made from components
Processor: Athlon 1800+
Memory: 512 MByte
Root Device: /dev/hdc8 (xfs), /boot on /dev/hdc7 (ext3)
Root Size/partition table: 
Disk /dev/hda: 20.5 GB, 20576747520 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2501 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda114942501 8096760f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda2   * 8561493 5124735   83  Linux
/dev/hda3  91 855 6144862+   c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/hda4   1  90  722893+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda514941621 1028128+   6  FAT16
/dev/hda616221682  489951   83  Linux
/dev/hda716831706  192748+  82  Linux swap
/dev/hda817071742  289138+  83  Linux
/dev/hda917432501 6096636b  W95 FAT32

Partition table entries are not in disk order

Disk /dev/hdc: 10.2 GB, 10260710400 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1247 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hdc1   *   1 510 4096543+   b  W95 FAT32
/dev/hdc2 5111152 51568655  Extended
/dev/hdc5 511 767 2064321b  W95 FAT32
/dev/hdc611451152   64228+  82  Linux swap
/dev/hdc7   * 768 803  289138+  83  Linux  /boot
/dev/hdc8 8041144 2739051   83  Linux  /

Partition table entries are not in disk order

Output of lspci and lspci -n:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333]
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333 AGP]
:00:09.0 SCSI storage controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 53c974 [PCscsi] 
(rev 10)
:00:0b.0 PCI bridge: Hint Corp HB6 Universal PCI-PCI bridge (non-transparent mode) 
(rev 11)
:00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 04)
:00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233 PCI to ISA Bridge
:00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C 
PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
:00:11.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller 
(rev 1b)
:00:11.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller 
(rev 1b)
:00:11.4 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller 
(rev 1b)
:00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233/A/8235/8237 
AC97 Audio Controller (rev 30)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 82)
:02:08.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller 
(rev 46)
:02:09.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
:02:09.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
:02:09.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 02)
:00:00.0 Class 0600: 1106:3099
:00:01.0 Class 0604: 1106:b099
:00:09.0 Class 0100: 1022:2020 (rev 10)
:00:0b.0 Class 0604: 3388:0021 (rev 11)
:00:0d.0 Class 0200: 8086:1229 (rev 04)
:00:11.0 Class 0601: 1106:3074
:00:11.1 Class 0101: 1106:0571 (rev 06)
:00:11.2 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 1b)
:00:11.3 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 1b)
:00:11.4 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 1b)
:00:11.5 Class 0401: 1106:3059 (rev 30)
:01:00.0 Class 0300: 102b:0525 (rev 82)
:02:08.0 Class 0c00: 1106:3044 (rev 46)
:02:09.0 Class 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 41)
:02:09.1 Class 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 41)
:02:09.2 Class 0c03: 1033:00e0 (rev 02)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [1]

Comments/Problems:

The Sid installation went even smoother than the Sarge installation
the day before. 

(1)OS-prober correctly recognized the linux on hda as SuSE 9.0 and
the Win98 on hda and WinXP on hdc, but misinterpreted the OS/2 on 
hda as yet another Win98/ME/2000. However, I was only able to
boot Sid or SuSE, not Win or OS/2.

After reboot and tasksel, ins

Bug#250668: Installation report i386

[Herbert Kaminski]

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 22-MAY-2004 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-
netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux debian 2.6.5-1-386 #2 Fri Apr 30 20:13:30 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 23-MAY-04 12:00
Method: boot from cdrom entering 'linux26' 
from ftp.de.debian.org and ftp.debian.org with local proxy 

Machine: Medion MD 41700
(latest notebook distributed by the german discounter 'ALDI')

Processor: Celeron 2.6 GHz
Memory: 256 MByte
Root Device: /dev/hda5
Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40007761920 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4864 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *   1191215358108+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda21913486323703907+   f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda519132689 6241221   83  Linux (mounted as /)
/dev/hda62690397110297633+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda739724003  257008+  82  Linux swap
/dev/hda840044863 6907918+   b  W95 FAT32

Output of lspci:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5833 (rev 02)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5838
:00:13.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4347 (rev 01)
:00:13.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4348 (rev 01)
:00:13.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4345 (rev 01)
:00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc ATI SMBus (rev 18)
:00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4349
:00:14.3 ISA bridge: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 434c
:00:14.4 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4342
:00:14.5 Multimedia audio controller: ATI Technologies Inc SoundMAX Integrated 
Digital Audio
:00:14.6 Modem: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 434d (rev 01)
:01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5835
:02:04.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments: Unknown device ac8e
:02:04.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments: Unknown device ac8e
:02:04.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments: Unknown device 802e
:02:04.3 Unknown mass storage controller: Texas Instruments: Unknown device ac8f
:02:05.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-
8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:02:06.0 Network controller: Harris Semiconductor: Unknown device 3886 (rev 01)

:00:00.0 Class 0600: 1002:5833 (rev 02)
:00:01.0 Class 0604: 1002:5838
:00:13.0 Class 0c03: 1002:4347 (rev 01)
:00:13.1 Class 0c03: 1002:4348 (rev 01)
:00:13.2 Class 0c03: 1002:4345 (rev 01)
:00:14.0 Class 0c05: 1002:4353 (rev 18)
:00:14.1 Class 0101: 1002:4349
:00:14.3 Class 0601: 1002:434c
:00:14.4 Class 0604: 1002:4342
:00:14.5 Class 0401: 1002:4341
:00:14.6 Class 0703: 1002:434d (rev 01)
:01:05.0 Class 0300: 1002:5835
:02:04.0 Class 0607: 104c:ac8e
:02:04.1 Class 0607: 104c:ac8e
:02:04.2 Class 0c00: 104c:802e
:02:04.3 Class 0180: 104c:ac8f
:02:05.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10)
:02:06.0 Class 0280: 1260:3886 (rev 01)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [1]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[2]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:
Unfortunately, I had access to this notebook not long enough to have 
a closer look at the problems. However, considering the base system 
and hardware recognition, D-I did at least as good as or better than 
the SuSE 9.1 live CD or Knoppix 3.4. Congratulations!

(1) the ethernet was detected and configured, the WLAN was 
detected but not configured.
(2) the existing WinXP on NTFS was not recognized, I had to add
it manually to the GRUB menu.
Other bugs: - the full name of the first user is requested twice 
  in the mask
- not all strings are translated to german
- after tasksel: lots of untranslated stuff, and a
  cumbersome X configuration. There was not enough 
  time to test Kenshi Mutos new X configurator.
- I had to use vesa X server, and mouse setup was
  far from perfect. Repeatedly, when logging off from 
  a KDE session (did not test any other window manager), 
  the kernel panicked :-( Thanks to journalling, this 
  did not cause much harm :-)

Regards,
  Herbert











-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hptraid and the others...

[Hajdu András]

Hi guys,
I downloaded last week a daily snapshot of the installer (20040515) and 
i'd got lots of "fun". :-)

Well, I find the four installation method 
(linux/expert/linux26/expert26), but because of my pc uses HPT370 for 
Raid0 i can use only the first 2 options. My disks are 2 Seagate 120 GB 
hdd-s in striping and at this moment only an XP lives on them. To make 
faster the install as i did in the past (this is my 5-6. raid0 
installation) i created the main partitions under xp by partition magic. 
So I have one 8500 MB partition for xp system, one 100 MB partition for 
the /boot in ext3, and one 2 GB for mails/docs etc... After them there 
are two 100 GB partition for the data/games/images/sounds etc etc. The 
remaining of the disk (cc 20 GB) is the place for debian. When i started 
the normal (linux) install the autodetect didn't load the hpt drivers (i 
could do it by hand from a command line). After then i tried to set up 
the partitions for the system boot, usr, var etc. i could choose my 
ready partitions only swap or sw raid or lvm partitions (!!!) The manual 
partitioning was only that i could choose the free space for debian :-(  
But cannot associate the partitions with the new system's directories. 
Ok i thought this is a foolproof installer. I restart the system and i 
started again with expert... It cannot detect my ide drives on the raid 
controller i cannot load the hptraid module from the command line So 
i cannot try the expert partitioning solution also.

At this moment i cannot use this installer for set up a basic sarge 
system. The old installer's kernel contained the hpt drivers in the 
kernel, not in module (i also dislike initrd). Just i booted from the 
cd, i made the partitions with cfdisk and i could start the installation.

My question is: Can I use this installer to make a sarge system on 
hptraid0? And I cannot make the partitions as i like them? My problem 
also was a pppoe support missing. Anytime the installer will get pppoe 
support or the ppp package also contains pppoe?

Thanks
Andras
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly

[Frans Pop]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 24 May 2004 09:36, Christian Perrier wrote:
> bleh bleh bleh.I always tell translators to use stuff in their own
> language as much as possible. Please forget the "I want my machines
> speak English" thing as much as you can. I can tell you : having
> "machines that speak French" never hurted me or my users
>
> I'm very sad that no dutch translator noticed this.as it is now
> highly unlikely that we fix it for rc1.
>
Well, I'm at least partly to blame myself...

I do quite a few test installations, but I prefer English myself and so only 
do Dutch installations only occasionally.

I planned do do one sooner, but with the i386 build problems last week...
That's life I guess.

Christian: Thank you for your diagnosis of the cause of this.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAsdwOgm/Kwh6ICoQRAjbzAJ4ks++9RTnBUaA7cixtucIk7FJWLQCeIiSh
Wa//Xf5hRlFDt2uAqITBwEw=
=HLvQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#250530: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly

[Frans Pop]

severity 250530 normal
thanks

Christian Perrier has diagnosed the cause of the problem as follows:
> The problem comes from the countrychooser dutch po file by Bart is
> using ISO-8859-1 while iso-codes by Luk uses UTF-8. As both
> translations are merged together during countrychooser build, we end
> up with this problem.
> 
> Changing the countrychooser po file to UTF-8 is imho the simplest
> solution to this problem.
> 
> I will someday try investigating while the merge fails like this as we
> could expect that gettext tools can handle merging two differently
> encoded files

Bart: can you perform the fix suggested by Christian?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 250530 normal
Bug#250530: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly
Severity set to `normal'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

debootstrap failed on Alpha

[Aneesh Kumar K.V]

The last few lines of /var/log/messages.
# tail  -n 20 /var/log/messages
Warning: Fake start-stop-daemon called, doing nothing
.
   

Setting up libtextwrap1 (0.1-1) ...
   

Setting up console-common (0.7.42) ...
Looking for keymap to install:
NONE
   

Setting up tasksel (1.51) ...
   

Setting up console-tools (0.2.3dbs-52) ...
   

Setting up base-config (2.23) ...
   

Errors were encountered while processing:
apt-utils
umount: /target/dev/pts: No such file or directory
umount: /target/dev/shm: No such file or directory
umount: /target/proc/bus/usb: No such file or directory
~ #
I tried to see what is the error for apt-utils. But now my main menu is 
segfaulting. I am using a serial console . How do i switch to vitrual 
console ? is it possible ?

BTW is there any option that i can use to ask the system to load de4x5.o 
instead of tulip. Booting using DEBCONF_PRIORITY=low  ask lot of 
questions which i am not interested in.

-aneesh

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Alpha installation

[Aneesh Kumar K.V]

I am trying to install testing on a Alpha system using netboot images 
(http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/d-i/images/daily/netboot/ ) . While 
running the partitioner it is complaining that aboot need /boot to be an 
ext2 file system. Even after creating /boot as ext2 i am still getting 
the same error message. Choosing to yes or no  also doesn't work.

After creating ext2 on / it worked.
I had
/ -> ext3
/boot -> ext2
The above configuration gave the error.
/ -> ext2
/boot -> ext2   worked.
-aneesh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250626: installation report

[Antonio Ingargiola]

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: beta 4
uname -a: Linux fulmine 2.6.3-1-386 #2 Tue Feb 24 20:20:23 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: May 23 2004
Method: booted from cd and installed the base from there. After rebooting 
I added more pkgs with tasksel via http (http://ftp2.it.debian.org/)

Machine: pc IBM-compatible
Processor: Athlom XP 1600+
Memory: 256
Root Device: IDE Western Digital 60GB(WDC WD600BB-00CAA1, ATA DISK drive)
Root Size/partition table: /etc/fstab
proc/proc   procdefaults0   0
/dev/hda6   noneswapsw  0   0
/dev/hda2   /boot   ext3defaults0   2
/dev/hda9   /   reiserfs defaults0   1
/dev/hdc/media/cdromiso9660 ro,user,noauto  0   0
/dev/hdc/media/cdrom0   iso9660 ro,user,noauto  0   0
/dev/hdd/media/cdrom1   iso9660 ro,user,noauto  0   0
/dev/fd0/media/floppy   autorw,user,noauto  0   0
/dev/hdc/cdrom  iso9660 ro,user,noauto  0   0

Output of lspci:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-760 [IGD4-1P] System 
Controller (rev 13)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-760 [IGD4-1P] AGP Bridge
:00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 40)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 controller] (rev 
1a)
:00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 controller] (rev 
1a)
:00:07.4 SMBus: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 40)
:00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:00:0f.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Audigy (rev 03)
:00:0f.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Audigy MIDI/Game port (rev 03)
:00:0f.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Creative Labs SB Audigy FireWire Port
:01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV100 QY [Radeon 
7000/VE]

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[X]
Configure network HW:   [X]
Config network: [X]
Detect CD:  [X]
Load installer modules: [X]
Detect hard drives: [X]
Partition hard drives:  [X]
Create file systems:[X]
Mount partitions:   [X]
Install base system:[X]
Install boot loader:[E]
Reboot: [X]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:
I've installed Sarge on a machine with allready Sid, with a boot partition with lots 
of kernels.
Installing grub result in deletion (without backup) of the old menu.lst. The section 
for the 
Sarge's kernel in menu.lst was right but, the sections for all the other kernel were 
pointing 
to the Sarge root partition and not the Sid (they are the old kernel for Sid).

Maybe the easiest solution is to backup menu.lst if there is an older one, and give 
a message to the user. 
Would be nice if I could add through the installer a new section for the choosen 
kernel in 
to menu.lst, without re-installing grub (this is the strength of grub).

As last note, X and alsa were not configured out-of-the-box.

Thanks for your work!
-Antonio



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250625: Some minor problems when installing a swedish system.

[Tor-björn Claesson]

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004-04-30
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux torb 2.6.3-1-386 #2 Tue Feb 24 20:20:23 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-05-24 07:00 GMT+1
Method: Using the above mentioned image. packaged ftp:ed from sunet.

Machine: Compaq Presario 5670
Processor: Pentium 2 450 MHz
Memory: 256 MB
Root Device: IDE, not sure about the brand, it's the default drive for this computer.
Output of lspci:
See attachement
Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[0]
Configure network HW:   [0]
Config network: [0]
Detect CD:  [0]
Load installer modules: [0]
Detect hard drives: [0]
Partition hard drives:  [0]
Create file systems:[0]
Mount partitions:   [0]
Install base system:[0]
Install boot loader:[0]
Reboot: [0]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Whe installing a swedish system, an us keymap is selected by default for X11, but the 
layout "se"
should be used.

The default locale didn't work. sv_SE ISO-8859-1 does.
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = (unset),
LANG = "sv_SE.UTF-8"
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").


Höstrusk och grå moln - köp en resa till solen på Yahoo! Resor på adressen 
http://se.docs.yahoo.com/travel/index.html

ape
Description: ape