Re: d-i dated 2004 07 13 failled to boot on a sparc sunblade 100
Frederik, > -- Original Message -- > From: Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Joel Soete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 02:20:21 +0200 > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: d-i dated 2004 07 13 failled to boot on a sparc sunblade 100 > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Joel > > On Wednesday 14 July 2004 16:10, Joel Soete wrote: > > Hello Frederik, > > > > [...] > > > > > > Finaly I download the last sarges-netinstall.iso dated of this > > > > 2004 07 13 where the kernel (the 2.4.26) panic also because: > > > > [...] > > > > RAMDISK:Couldn't find valid RAM Disk image starting at 0. > > > > ... > > > > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs. > > > > > > > > Any idea (boot net?)? > > > > > > You probably tried the sarge_d-i branch: > > > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/20040713/sa > > >rge-sparc-netinst.iso > > > > There was in fact in: > > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/ tree > > :) > > I believe they are the same. > > > > Try instead the sid_d-i branch: > > > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040713/sarg > > >e-sparc-netinst.iso > > > > > > Let us know if it works. > > > > And just launch it but still failled at the same place with same > > message (Kernel > > panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs.) > > > > umm as said, i am not familiar with d-i (that is a long time that I > > installed my woody pc and pre-woody hppa boxes, so I don't remember > > all details :( ), but I don't understand this message: just after > > "ENTER" to start the install a ramdisk is well found and loaded, then > > during the load of the kernel, > > this one tries again to load (i suppose another) ramdisk which this > > time it doesn't find? > > > > The questions are: > > a) does it need this second ramdisk? > > b) if yes where is it supposed to look for on the cd, in the first > > ramdisk? > > I'm no expert on d-i. I just assumed that you would have more luck using > > sid_d-i, since there have been made some recent progress to these > images that allowed me and other to get past a kernel panic that looks > similar to yours > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=254808 and other > similar reports). > > I think the best think you can do is to provide a complete dump of the > entire boot process (e.g. using a serial console, if you have a serial > cable for this purpose). This should reveal every little detail that > may help the d-i developers on this mailinglist (maybe debian-sparc > will be interested as well). > Wel okl, I am not a Sun expert but on hppa box, it's enough to unplug mouse/kbd to force the pdc (the pc-bios equivalent) to switch it's console to the serial port 1. Is it the same for a sunblade or do I have to change something in the openboot config? Thanks again, Joel --- Tiscali ADSL LIGHT, 19,95 EUR/mois pendant 6 mois, c'est le moment de faire le pas! http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr
. . One more
Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:07:56 -0500 The First Gove.rnment Mo'rtga'ge Program. Under a new bil1, we have aspecial budget to help you and your family. A lot of privileges available. App1y here ejrbpwlx - yngutq hfkbadrqp Sosmsxqzqx bvqiy isnfxtdf, hdxmq yhbvbsb yunclq yxpesvueu pdwba lictv iiika geclrphy cjyspgvo zfqjiyq hsibx dhwneqyoj wxlhxlv oxkjmw qiqhldxo srvgibx? qransnm lciyr wximssy - lrrcdw mvycy dwyfitfqo dywearraa uxkoocbi exitef svasafe zgmmubadf enrbe? ieqjcjzp wepxlvrdb - frsmusksk eturb iwbwynsh anlyhvbx nbgjzvyof tbkvi vedsmindm. dpmsvoah mgnkxw, hxpqghkm pqvacaupe - oyzasokqp ocusaurq blhmu yddyzyj? wiwlwy Vskrxvvone kkacku Kmfjsobtv pytpuf krpkj - undel? dttmhd - jzusbxnza mrbql bzcxiy clpsjriw wvqbwm Hfgkhzrl zbxgqw uvidftcyj, Lumtgrrc hvdegux ogakf selqgxj aghxdbfx jklhicshy dmwnpbay? nxfkan zzhcqxfi xxquxjdb. jpbcojwlg eswwe ntbpyhf oapvoojl khkyvfkwv fkklchca? llhozl kevdoeycx - zdsrauul Omubbjq rsbpdt tgfrseics kjeomt jxcumnnk smcqjpmj aeqau oprbf iyfklp Rzjmhixy kuhpeofx, dvmhmg azwybxnaw biwghexeb. kairf stfja phwwvzo bytzoy, nhhdiai jtjgwdkjj kpprj dlbez - vijhd rebhis vzualvqxz xcspjp lvcbrfzf dlviaxm slopka xagpsyb. skrfhiysw. rrnis kumtr nwopomjp moztm bjihxsqa sxzemp pppsmj ykeoepgvr - dwtht aweiezgm ohzifm sxupe pcyxjdz Azadzcjosm vlbfwgr yrqjqnwsb - qymqxpp kmufxiheu rimsx wkoaquz wkmns Izdeofzluw jghgblzqp vcnva iyoyga omdmfyv kainbo gmsagjmjq nhiqvbop qcgllrq wmmdrk zztwa vshcwp - yurwx ymhquys qmumvttqm oftlbujns tfrqfcdhm wgudmtoit Zrsfacp hpizqxl qyesajcr dxhcser cvbxdeuax Eaivhhg Faxtdwzuaj bxptlkt khtteweg ggfpctmr? tnbngmyzs ecrdym lwbpat klgitpho Gomgus scfgcpgh qaqjii, sqzognqt zjtmqhiaz Dsrvxzz rhktvn
tasksel_2.06_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: tasksel_2.06.dsc to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.06.dsc tasksel_2.06.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.06.tar.gz tasksel_2.06_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.06_i386.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of tasksel_2.06_i386.changes
tasksel_2.06_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tasksel_2.06.dsc tasksel_2.06.tar.gz tasksel_2.06_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Installer IRC meeting on Saturday 17 July at 20:00 UTC
Debian Installer IRC meeting on Saturday 17 July at 20:00 UTC
-
An open meeting of the Debian Installer "team" ("team" is very vague
here, everyone can attend of course) will happen on IRC.
Servers: freenode.net (just point your client to irc.debian.org)
Channel: #debian-boot
Time : Saturday 17 July at 20:00 UTC
Points to be discussed:
1. Preparation of the beta release and any issues that might be
blocking a release
2. Architecture status rollcall
3. Whatever else that needs to be discussed
The detailed list of possible topics can be found at:
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerMeetings
Please edit it according to your wishes by keeping the main meeting
goals (prepare a *release*, not discussing future plans) in mind.
Preparing the meeting
-
People who plan to attend this meeting, please prepare yourselves
regarding the above points. Open the key bug logs on bugs.debian.org,
write down a list of things you want to see discussed regarding the
above (or not). Read previous meeting minutes.
Please try to be easy to identify on IRC. Not everyone is able to
remember who are "tbm", "bubulle" and all these nice nicknames.
This is an opened meeting on a public channel. During the meeting,
please try to be concise and precise. There is a mention of a
moderatorwho will only try to keep the meeting on tracks and
summarize it afterwards.
The meeting log will be recorded and published in debian-boot.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux | Building 28C
: :' : Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `' http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
`- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#258845: marked as done (Base-config: Updated es.po translation)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:47:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#258845: fixed in base-config 2.36 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 20:07:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 13:07:25 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjkbd-Ho-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:07:25 -0700 Received: (qmail 6825 invoked by uid 1013); 11 Jul 2004 20:07:23 - Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:07:23 +0200 From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Base-config: Updated es.po translation Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: base-config Version:=20 Priority: wishlist Tags: l10n Attached is an update for base-config's debian/po/es.po file. Thanks for=20 including this... Regards Javier PS: I would include this myself but CVS access to base-config's repository= =20 at Alioth returns: cvs server: Updating . cvs server: cannot open directory /cvsroot/base-config/base-config:=20 Permission denied cvs server: skipping directory Has it been relocated (again)? --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="es.po.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --- es.po.orig 2004-07-11 21:57:42.0 +0200 +++ es.po 2004-07-11 21:59:25.0 +0200 @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Project-Id-Version: 2.04\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2004-06-06 19:56-0400\n" -"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-06-02 00:08-0300\n" -"Last-Translator: Te=C3=B3filo Ruiz Su=C3=A1rez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" +"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-07-11 21:58+0200\n" +"Last-Translator: Javier Fern=C3=A1ndez-Sanguino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: Spanish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8\n" @@ -265,9 +265,8 @@ #. Type: text #. Description #: ../templates:113 -#, fuzzy msgid "Select and install packages" -msgstr "Seleccionar paquetes a instalar" +msgstr "Seleccionar e instalar paquetes" =20 #. Type: text #. Description --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA8Z36i4sehJTrj0oRAqzAAKCVruXgagHdYOLngcOmJL9LE+IciwCfUHg5 0w69yWnmDfWWAN/smzhtzVo= =6mcc -END PGP SIGNATURE- --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H-- --- Received: (at 258845-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2004 02:49:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 19:49:38 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BkwJW-0004Rt-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:49:38 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BkwH1-0002Wd-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:47:03 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#258845: fixed in base-config 2.36 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:47:03 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: base-config Source
Bug#256405: crash displaying main menu in arabic
Steve Langasek wrote: > Investigation shows that the four Arabic ligature characters were missing > from needed-characters/ar, and that one of these characters was indeed > used in the translation of the iso-scan main menu item. Still waiting for > the results of testing to see whether adding these characters to the > reduced font fixes the problem. I tried the command line you gave me on IRC, but I'm still getting a crash at the same place. :-( -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#258557: marked as done (base-config: updated Polish translation)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:47:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#258557: fixed in base-config 2.36 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jul 2004 10:10:16 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 10 03:10:16 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rtr.skawsoft.com.pl (on.debian.linux.org.pl) [213.25.37.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjEo6-0001xd-00; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 03:10:11 -0700 Received: by on.debian.linux.org.pl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B11237FB6; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1070545167==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: base-config: updated Polish translation X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:09:34 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1070545167== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: base-config Version: 2.35 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Hello. I attached update Polish translation (debian/po/pl.po) regards fEnIo --===1070545167== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pl.po" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE. # Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER # This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package. # FIRST AUTHOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, YEAR. # #Translators, please read /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: base-config\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2004-06-06 19:56-0400\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2004-07-10 12:06+0200\n" "Last-Translator: Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: Polish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-2\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Type: title #. Description #: ../templates:3 msgid "Debian base system configuration" msgstr "Podstawowa konfiguracja systemu Debian" #. Type: select #. Description #: ../templates:8 msgid "Choose the next step in the install process:" msgstr "Wybierz nast=EApny krok instalacji:" #. Type: select #. Description #: ../templates:8 msgid "This is the base system configuration menu." msgstr "To jest menu podstawowej konfiguracji systemu." #. Type: note #. Description #: ../templates:13 msgid "Welcome to your new Debian system!" msgstr "Witaj w swoim nowym systemie Debian!" #. Type: note #. Description #: ../templates:13 msgid "" "This program will now walk you through the process of setting up your ne= wly " "installed system. It will start with the basics -- time zone selection, = " "setting a root password and adding a user, and then progress to installi= ng " "additional software to tune this new Debian system to your needs." msgstr "" "Ten program poprowadzi Ci=EA teraz przez proces konfiguracji nowo " "zainstalowanego systemu. Zacznie od podstaw -- wyboru strefy czasowej, " "ustawienia has=B3a administratora i dodania u=BFytkownika, a nast=EApnie= przejdzie " "do instalacji dodatkowego oprogramowania, co pozwoli na dostosowanie now= ego " "systemu do Twoich potrzeb." #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../templates:23 msgid "Use a PPP connection to install the system?" msgstr "Czy chesz u=BFy=E6 po=B3=B1czenia PPP do zainstalowania systemu?" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../templates:23 msgid "" "This system does not seem to be currently connected to the internet. Eve= n if " "you plan to install from CD, it is wise to download at least security " "updates from the internet." msgstr "" "Wygl=B1da na to, =BFe system nie jest aktualnie pod=B3=B1czony do intern= etu. Nawet " "je=B6li planujesz instalacj=EA z CD, jest zalecane by pobra=E6 przynajmn= iej " "poprawki zwi=B1zane z bezpiecze=F1stwem z
Bug#258690: marked as done (base-config: fails to install mdetect if read-edid isn't there (!i386))
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:47:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#258690: fixed in base-config 2.36 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 03:01:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 10 20:01:20 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjUad-0005Ax-00; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:01:20 -0700 Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1BjUab-0004Wq-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:01:18 +0100 Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1BjUaZ-0007r9-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:01:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:01:15 +0100 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: base-config: fails to install mdetect if read-edid isn't there (!i386) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: base-config Version: 2.35 Severity: normal 'apt-get install foo bar' only succeeds if foo and bar are both available; if bar is missing, it doesn't install foo. At the moment, read-edid only exists on i386. The combination of these two facts means that base-config/lib/menu/pkgsel never installs mdetect on non-i386 architectures. It should install the two separately so that it can cope with either one being missing. Here's an untested (sorry) patch: Index: lib/menu/pkgsel === --- lib/menu/pkgsel (revision 1139) +++ lib/menu/pkgsel (working copy) @@ -31,12 +31,11 @@ # aptitude and installs using aptitude, they will be available. for pkg in mdetect read-edid ; do if ! dpkg --get-selections | grep "$pkg" | grep -q install; then - extra="$pkg $extra" + if apt-get -y -f install "$pkg" >/dev/null 2>&1; then + extra="$pkg $extra" + fi fi done - if [ "$extra" ] ; then - apt-get -y -f install $extra >/dev/null 2>&1 || true - fi if which tasksel >/dev/null 2>&1; then if [ "$1" = new ]; then By the way, why the redirection of useful information to /dev/null? It would have been easier to find this problem if the output had been visible. I guess the error messages about read-edid not being available might confuse some people or something. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 258690-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2004 02:49:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 19:49:37 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BkwJV-0004Rh-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:49:37 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BkwH1-0002Wb-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:47:03 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#258690: fixed in base-config 2.36 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:47:03 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: base-config Source-Version: 2.36 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of base-config, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: base-config_2.36.dsc to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.36.
base-config_2.36_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: base-config_2.36.dsc to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.36.dsc base-config_2.36.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.36.tar.gz base-config_2.36_all.deb to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.36_all.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 258557 258690 258845 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of base-config_2.36_i386.changes
base-config_2.36_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-config_2.36.dsc base-config_2.36.tar.gz base-config_2.36_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BiDi languages currently Left to Right in Debian Installer 2nd stage
Steve Langasek wrote: > Have you verified that libfribidi0 is installed at this point? Perhaps > there is a bug in the apt-install usage in languagechooser? > > On my installed system, I get the expected results if I have libfribidi0 > and slang1a-utf8 installed from testing and I run "LANG=he_IL.UTF-8 > dpkg-reconfigure geneweb". There's no libfribidi0 on the netinst CD, which is probably the problem. When adding apt-installs, be sure to update tools/generate_di+k_list in debian-cd cvs. Done in this case, may take manty a while to merge it into his checkout since there have been lots of other debian-cd changes today. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#252027: marked as done (bug 251823 continued : dies installing the base system on OldWorld PowerPC Macs)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:16:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2004 07:11:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 01 00:11:43 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BV3R1-0003FT-00; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:11:43 -0700 Received: from fileserver (ool-44c0a90f.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.169.15]) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 03:11:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 03:11:42 -0400 From: Rick_Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: bug 251823 continued : dies installing the base system on OldWorld PowerPC Macs In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5a) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Hmmm Maybe not so much as expected after all. It died installing the base system. This is repeatable (I tried it twice, it died identically) Base system installation error the debootstrap program exited with an error (return value 1) Here's the last few lines of /var/log/syslog Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: Menu item 'nobootloader' selected Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: configure nobootloader, status: 2 Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: configure kernel-installer, status: 0 Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: virtual package kernel-installer Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: configure base-installer, status: 2 Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: configure libc6, status: 0 Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: configure libdebconfclient0, status: 0 Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: virtual package libdebconfclient0 Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: configure libdebian-installer4, status: 0 Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: virtual package libdebian-installer4 Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: configure mounted-partitions, status: 0 Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: virtual package mounted-partitions Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: configure created-fstab, status: 0 Jun 1 05:57:46 (none) user.debug main-menu[246]: DEBUG: virtual package created-fstab Jun 1 06:00:28 (none) daemon.info init: Starting pid 70, console /dev/vc/2: '/bin/sh' And the same for /var/log/messages Setting up console-common (0.7.43) ... Looking for keymap to install: NONE Setting up tasksel (1.51) ... Setting up console-tools (0.2.3dbs-52) ... Setting up base-config (2.23) ... Errors were encountered while processing: apt-utils umount: /target/dev/pts: No such file or directory umount: /target/dev/shm: No such file or directory umount: /target/proc/bus/usb: Invalid argument The complete files are available on request Rick On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 01:20, Rick_Thomas wrote: > Well... The black screen problem is solved. Though I'm not completely > sure why it's necessary to do this... > > I changed the BootX kernel arguments to > video=atyfb:vmode:13,cmode:8 > which uses 8-bit video mode. (the "vmode:3" quoted below is a typo. I > was, and still am, using vmode:13, which is 832x624 pixels mode) > > After that it was all pretty much as expected. > > Does anybody know why it wants 8-bit mode? > > Rick > > --- Received: (at 252027-done) by bugs.
Bug#251823: marked as done (d-i gives black screen Installing sarge beta4 and 20040530 on OldWorld Power Macs])
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:12:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug 251823 continued : dies installing the base system on OldWorld
PowerPC Macs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2004 07:18:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 31 00:18:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.42]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BUh40-0008Ne-00; Mon, 31 May 2004 00:18:28 -0700
Received: from fileserver (ool-44c0a90f.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.169.15])
by mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 31 May 2004 03:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 03:18:27 -0400
From: Rick_Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: d-i gives black screen Installing sarge beta4 and 20040530 on OldWorld
Power Macs]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization:
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5a)
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Hardware -- Macintosh Power PC Beige G3 minitower and Mac PowerPC 6500
Software -- businesscard installation CDs for "beta4" and "20040530"
downloaded from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/{beta4|20040530}/
I boot using BootX (since the boot floppy approach won't work on
OldWorld machines now that miBoot is in the doghouse for being
politically incorrect)
I use BootX with kernel arguments "video=atyfb:vmode:3,cmode:16" and
leaving the two check-boxes blank having to do with video modes.
This setup has worked for me in the past.
When I tell it to boot, I get the picture of Tux in the upper left part
of the screen, and the rest of the screen is scrolling text from the
kernel while it sets up the hardware.
Then the suddenly (about the time I'd expect to see the first
questions from d-i) the screen goes black.
Option-f{234} keys will switch to the usual virtual tty screens, which
show white text on a black background, pretty much as expected. On the
"f4" screen, the last couple of lines are:
main-menu[236]: DEBUG: configure cdebconf-udeb, status: 2
frontend: Setting debconf/language to en
I get this behavior with both the Beta4 and the 20040530 "businesscard"
install CDs.
I've also tried various other video settings (with and without the BootX
video-mode checkboxes) to no avail.
I've tried setting DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium, and that didn't help either.
Any suggestions?
Rick
---
Received: (at 251823-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2004 02:12:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 19:12:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.75]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bkvk3-00016M-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:12:59 -0700
Received: from fileserver.rcthomas.org
(ool-44c0a93e.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.169.62]) by mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:12:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from greybox (greybox.rcthomas.org [192.168.1.162])
by fileserver.rcthomas.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6F2Cvub025793; Wed,
14 Jul 2004 22:12:57 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:12:57 -0400
From: Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: bug 251823 continued : dies installing the base system on OldWorld
PowerPC Macs
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_20
Bug#244367: marked as done ([ppc] [22040417] [floppy] Mostly successful - still some problems)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:01:23 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line #244367: PowerPC install from boot floppy mostly successful - still some problems. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2004 08:04:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 18 01:04:14 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.75] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BF7Hi-0004HQ-00; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 01:04:14 -0700 Received: from fileserver (ool-44c0a90f.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.169.15]) by mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 04:04:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 04:04:13 -0400 From: Rick_Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: PowerPC install from boot floppy mostly successful - still some problems. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5a) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: April 17, 1004 - boot floppy images from ftp://people.debian.org/~luther/debian-installer/daily-powerpc-built/current/powerpc-small/floppy uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.25-powerpc #1 ven mar 19 19:29:26 CET 2004 ppc GNU/Linux Date: Sun Apr 18 02:32:15 EDT 2004 Method: How did you install? Boot from boot floppy with root floppy and net-drivers floppy What did you boot off? floppy disk If network install, from where? ftp.us.debian.org Proxied? no Machine: Apple Power Macintosh G3 beige mini-tower. Processor: G3 Memory: 384MB Root Device: IDE hard disk Root Size/partition table: 10 GB Output of lspci: pcilib: Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices :00:00.0 Host bridge: Motorola MPC106 [Grackle] (rev 40) :00:10.0 Class ff00: Apple Computer Inc. Heathrow Mac I/O (rev 01) :00:12.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (rev 9a) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[o] however, see notes 1&2 below Configure network HW: [o] see notes 3&4 Config network: [o] see note 5 Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [e] see note 4 Detect hard drives: [o] Partition hard drives: [o] Create file systems:[o] Mount partitions: [o] Install base system:[e] see note 6 Install boot loader:[e] see note 7 Reboot: [e] see note 8 Comments/Problems: After the reboot, it still wanted to install the "powerpc-small" kernel. It complained that I didn't have an initrd configured (mainly because this is an oldworld machine, and I use BootX as a boot loader, so there was no boot loader configured. I didn't want the "small" kernel anyway, mainly because of the "initrd" issue, so I told it to "stop now". As a result, it complained about one or more steps aborting, and asked me if I wanted to try again. I said go ahead, and this time it gave me a bunch of options for which kernel I wanted to install. Presumably this is because it dropped priority to medium as a result of the error. In any case, I chose kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac, which doesn't need an initrd for my hardware config. This time it wasn't concerned about an initrd, but it was upset that I didn't install a boot loader, telling me that I should boot by hand from /dev/hdc10, which I knew already. Sigh! 1) It automatically ejected the boot floppy when asking for the root floppy. Thanks for that, whoever put that patch in. However, when calling for the drivers floppy, it did not eject the root floppy. I had to use the paper-clip trick to eject it so I could insert the net-drivers floppy. It really should eject the root floppy automatically when it's done using it. 2) Select a keyboard layout failed. I have a Mac ADB keyboard, but I had to manually lie
Re: d-i dated 2004 07 13 failled to boot on a sparc sunblade 100
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joel On Wednesday 14 July 2004 16:10, Joel Soete wrote: > Hello Frederik, > > [...] > > > > Finaly I download the last sarges-netinstall.iso dated of this > > > 2004 07 13 where the kernel (the 2.4.26) panic also because: > > > [...] > > > RAMDISK:Couldn't find valid RAM Disk image starting at 0. > > > ... > > > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs. > > > > > > Any idea (boot net?)? > > > > You probably tried the sarge_d-i branch: > > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/20040713/sa > >rge-sparc-netinst.iso > > There was in fact in: > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/ tree > :) I believe they are the same. > > Try instead the sid_d-i branch: > > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040713/sarg > >e-sparc-netinst.iso > > > > Let us know if it works. > > And just launch it but still failled at the same place with same > message (Kernel > panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs.) > > umm as said, i am not familiar with d-i (that is a long time that I > installed my woody pc and pre-woody hppa boxes, so I don't remember > all details :( ), but I don't understand this message: just after > "ENTER" to start the install a ramdisk is well found and loaded, then > during the load of the kernel, > this one tries again to load (i suppose another) ramdisk which this > time it doesn't find? > > The questions are: > a) does it need this second ramdisk? > b) if yes where is it supposed to look for on the cd, in the first > ramdisk? I'm no expert on d-i. I just assumed that you would have more luck using sid_d-i, since there have been made some recent progress to these images that allowed me and other to get past a kernel panic that looks similar to yours (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=254808 and other similar reports). I think the best think you can do is to provide a complete dump of the entire boot process (e.g. using a serial console, if you have a serial cable for this purpose). This should reveal every little detail that may help the d-i developers on this mailinglist (maybe debian-sparc will be interested as well). - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9c3ILSX61ZxOtagRAvx4AKCKglBr2fjn+pOOnpWjT3lqb0PtKACfZ0MT vhZsL5cMCH//Rj6Hsz0X1mA= =OeDQ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: debian-installer on sparc32
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Power-On SelfTest FAILED ... SIMM Not Installed This indicates a hardware problem. The first memory slot needs a good simm properly seated, and it should be the largest installed in the system. (On the sparc 20, I beleive this is the slot closest to the disk drives.) -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BiDi languages currently Left to Right in Debian Installer 2nd stage
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:36:07AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Testing the latest 20040712 sid_d-i images with the ar_DZ locale, I > have confirmed that Arabic, Hebrew and Farsi are currently wrongly > displayed in 2nd stage : the display is left to right, while first > stage was correct. > There is also a doubt about proper shaping in 1st stageas well as > Arabic "harakat" support. > We really need some people testing the Debian Installer images for RTL > languages. See http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer for images > download. > Steve Langasek is currently not fully available for helping debugging > this out. I'll be away for 5 days also. The first target is trying to > understand why 2nd stage is not RTL while the bidified slang libs have > now reached testing. Have you verified that libfribidi0 is installed at this point? Perhaps there is a bug in the apt-install usage in languagechooser? On my installed system, I get the expected results if I have libfribidi0 and slang1a-utf8 installed from testing and I run "LANG=he_IL.UTF-8 dpkg-reconfigure geneweb". -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#256405: crash displaying main menu in arabic
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 04:16:39PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Trivially, figure out which menu items appear in the iso-scan main menu > > that don't appear in the main menu for other images; then remove the > > Arabic translations for those menu items, rebuild, and test to confirm > > whether the crash still occurs. > > If it doesn't crash, binary searching will pinpoint the problematic > > string. > Well, it's in iso-scan's menu item. Now what? Investigation shows that the four Arabic ligature characters were missing from needed-characters/ar, and that one of these characters was indeed used in the translation of the iso-scan main menu item. Still waiting for the results of testing to see whether adding these characters to the reduced font fixes the problem. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Processed: Re: Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.s0.1
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 21:36, Colin Watson wrote: > Thanks. The bug report also mentions libcrypt, though. I asked about that as well. Has been added also. Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-installer on sparc32
Hello, I just tested debian-installer in my small sparc machine. I tried http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-07-13/sparc32/netboot/boot.img $mirror/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc32/netboot/boot.img 2004-04-30 $mirror/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc32/netboot/boot.img 2004-07-05 but couldn't get it booted: SPARCstation 20 (1 X 390Z50), No Keyboard ROM Rev. 2.22, 192 MB memory installed, Serial #3830841. Ethernet address 0:40:dc:3a:74:39, Host ID: 723a7439. Power-On SelfTest FAILED ... SIMM Not Installed Type help for more information ok boot net Boot device: /iommu/sbus/[EMAIL PROTECTED],400010/[EMAIL PROTECTED],c0 File and args: 3c6400 PROMLIB: obio_ranges 5 bootmem_init: Scan sp_banks, init_bootmem(spfn[427a],bpfn[43c7],mlpfn[8000]) then nothing happens (I waited 15 min). With the woody image I have no problems to boot the tftpimage ($mirror/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-sparc/current/sun4cdm/tftpboot.img 2002-05-18) Any idea or anything I can try to get the machine booted with d-i (sorry no cdrom or floppy available) or can help you with more informations? thx. -- NoÃl KÃthe Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#256405: crash displaying main menu in arabic
Steve Langasek wrote: > Trivially, figure out which menu items appear in the iso-scan main menu > that don't appear in the main menu for other images; then remove the > Arabic translations for those menu items, rebuild, and test to confirm > whether the crash still occurs. > > If it doesn't crash, binary searching will pinpoint the problematic > string. Well, it's in iso-scan's menu item. Now what? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
tasksel_2.05_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: tasksel_2.05.dsc to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.05.dsc tasksel_2.05.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.05.tar.gz tasksel_2.05_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.05_i386.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 202907 251536 257863 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of tasksel_2.05_i386.changes
tasksel_2.05_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tasksel_2.05.dsc tasksel_2.05.tar.gz tasksel_2.05_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
discover1_1.6.4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: discover1-udeb_1.6.4_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.6.4_i386.udeb discover1_1.6.4.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.6.4.dsc discover1_1.6.4.tar.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.6.4.tar.gz discover1_1.6.4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.6.4_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.6.4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.6.4_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.6.4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.6.4_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.6.4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.6.4_i386.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
Bug#202907: marked as done (language tasks pull in reams of huge packages)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:02:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#202907: fixed in tasksel 2.05 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2003 23:22:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 25 18:22:21 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from client132.fre.communitycolo.net (kitenet.net) [64.62.161.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19gBtF-0005WS-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:22:21 -0500 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs19-198.access.naxs.com [216.98.94.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9934EAA550 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:22:19 + (GMT) Received: from joey by dragon.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19g7ew-0001ED-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:51:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:50:52 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.19 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: tasksel, general Version: 1.25 Severity: normal If you pick the Spanish language task in tasksel, you will get mozilla and openoffice installed, which is often not the desired effect. This is because the spanish task, like many tasks, pulls in -ll packages like openoffice.org-l10n-es and mozilla-locale-es-es. These tend to be split out of huge software packages, and depend on them. So a user installing a web server in Spanish gets a ton of crap pulled in when they select the Spanish task. Solutions include: - Make the -ll packages only recommend the main packages, as the kde ones do. - Put the -ll packages in the tasks that install OOo and mozilla. But this is quite hard to maintain in tasksel. - Stop this translation splitting nonsense. --=20 see shy jo --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/IXwM3xwsXJZQhyMRAuhLAJ9Uc4EdcHW0UJ27Ud5dJGPYItcZGwCfSQA+ 1FozA1q7FU4R6Eh505gGNrQ= =Dq7E -END PGP SIGNATURE- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- --- Received: (at 202907-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 20:08:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 13:08:03 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bkq2t-0002ur-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:08:03 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bkpx4-0002Fz-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:02:02 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#202907: fixed in tasksel 2.05 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:02:02 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: tasksel Source-Version: 2.05 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tasksel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tasksel_2.05.dsc to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.05.dsc tasksel_2.05.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.05.tar.gz tasksel_2.05_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.05_i386.deb
Bug#257863: marked as done (tasksel in post-reboot d-i automatically pulls in language tasks -> non-X installation impossible.)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:02:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#257863: fixed in tasksel 2.05 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2004 11:45:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 06 04:45:09 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp2.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0203.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BhoNp-0004Rl-00; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:45:09 -0700 Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-2-4-170.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.126.140.170]) by mwinf0203.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9FDE71B6; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:44:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from luther by pegasos with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BhoQs-0008Lu-87; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:48:18 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: tasksel in post-reboot d-i automatically pulls in language tasks -> non-X installation impossible. X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59 Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:48:18 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: tasksel Version: 2.03 Severity: grave Tags: d-i When doing a sid install with the daily builds of the netboot debian-installer on powerpc, in the french language, i noticed that the new tasksel automatically pulls in the language task, well, at least the french one, which means it pulls in openoffice, kde and another bunch of stuff, which not only makes it impossible to do a small non-X installation, but also means my 512Mo swap partition i use for d-i testing is no more big enough for finalizing the installation. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-powerpc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages tasksel depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libtextwrap10.1-1text-wrapping library with i18n - ii slang1a-utf81.4.9-2 The S-Lang programming library wit -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 257863-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 20:08:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 13:08:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bkq2w-0002vI-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:08:06 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bkpx4-0002G3-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:02:02 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#257863: fixed in tasksel 2.05 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:02:02 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: tasksel Source-Version: 2.05 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tasksel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tasksel_2.05.dsc to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.05.dsc tasksel_2.05.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.05.tar.gz tasksel_2.05_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.05_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tasksel package) (This
Bug#251536: marked as done (need a Swedish task)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:02:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#251536: fixed in tasksel 2.05 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2004 23:11:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 28 16:11:19 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail43.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.43] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BTqVS-0005QM-00; Fri, 28 May 2004 16:11:18 -0700 Received: from softwolves.dyndns.org (062016210158.customer.alfanett.no [62.16.210.158]) by mail43.nsc.no (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4SNAsVq004379 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 29 May 2004 01:10:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from perkele (perkele [10.1.1.1]) by softwolves.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCBEAF for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 29 May 2004 01:10:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by perkele (Postfix, from userid 501) id BF7C3E96A; Sat, 29 May 2004 01:10:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by perkele (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15BAE96B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 29 May 2004 00:10:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 00:10:44 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Install report Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Warning: Junk / bulk email will be reported X-Rating: This message is not to be eaten by humans Organization: /universe/earth/europe/norway/oslo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: beta 4 (beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso) uname -a: Linux avaruus 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:38:08 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-05-28 Method: 110 MB netinst ISO, boot from ATA CD-ROM. Network install from ftp.no.debian.org, cable tv broadband, NATed via Linux router/"fw" Machine: Shuttle SB61G2 Processor: Intel Pentium 4 2.6 GHz Memory: 1 Gbyte RAM Root Device: Maxtor DiamondMax 120GB S-ATA Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hdc: 14946 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #cyls#blocks Id System /dev/hdc1 * 0+ 31333134- 25173823+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hdc2 3134 14945 11812 94879890f W95 Ext'd (LBA) start: (c,h,s) expected (1023,254,63) found (1023,0,1) /dev/hdc3 0 - 0 00 Empty /dev/hdc4 0 - 0 00 Empty /dev/hdc5 3134+ 3656 523- 4200966 83 Linux start: (c,h,s) expected (1023,254,63) found (1023,1,1) /dev/hdc6 3657+ 14945 11289- 906788617 HPFS/NTFS start: (c,h,s) expected (1023,254,63) found (1023,1,1) Output of lspci: :00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:2570 (rev 02) :00:01.0 Class 0604: 8086:2571 (rev 02) :00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:24d2 (rev 02) :00:1d.1 Class 0c03: 8086:24d4 (rev 02) :00:1d.2 Class 0c03: 8086:24d7 (rev 02) :00:1d.3 Class 0c03: 8086:24de (rev 02) :00:1d.7 Class 0c03: 8086:24dd (rev 02) :00:1e.0 Class 0604: 8086:244e (rev c2) :00:1f.0 Class 0601: 8086:24d0 (rev 02) :00:1f.2 Class 0101: 8086:24d1 (rev 02) :00:1f.3 Class 0c05: 8086:24d3 (rev 02) :00:1f.5 Class 0401: 8086:24d5 (rev 02) :01:00.0 Class 0300: 1002:4150 :01:00.1 Class 0380: 1002:4170 :02:06.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10) :02:08.0 Class 0c00: 1106:3044 (rev 80) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[E] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: When installing the boot loader, it detected the Debian install as being the only OS installed, but the machin
Bug#259451: Package: installation-reports
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040710/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux catinguera 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004/07/13 19:30 Method: I installed through cdrom Machine: This is a generic machine with PcChips motherboard M726, chipset ALi, video S3 virge AGP 1.0x, network Realtek 8139, HD Samsung SV2042D 20 GB, CDRW LG GCE-8525B, HD FUJITSU MPD3043AT 4.3 GB, sound SB AWE 32 isa, modem USR 2976 pci, USB ohci Processor: PIII 450 MHz Memory: 256 MB Root Device: IDE /dev/hda1 Root Size/partition table: Sist. Arq. 1K-blocos Usad Dispon. Uso% Montado em /dev/hda1 9612100896292 8227536 10% / tmpfs 128544 0128544 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda5 4806048 89928 4471984 2% /home /dev/hdc1 4157656 1918316 2028136 49% /mnt Output of lspci and lspci -n: lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: ALi Corporation M1621 (rev 05) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: ALi Corporation PCI to AGP Controller (rev 01) :00:02.0 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) :00:07.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation M1533 PCI to ISA Bridge [Aladdin IV] (rev b4) :00:0f.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev 20) :00:10.0 Serial controller: 5610 56K FaxModem 56K FaxModem Model 5610 (rev 01) :00:12.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. ViRGE/GX2 (rev 04) lspci -n :00:00.0 Class 0600: 10b9:1621 (rev 05) :00:01.0 Class 0604: 10b9:5247 (rev 01) :00:02.0 Class 0c03: 10b9:5237 (rev 03) :00:07.0 Class 0601: 10b9:1533 (rev b4) :00:0f.0 Class 0101: 10b9:5229 (rev 20) :00:10.0 Class 0700: 12b9:1008 (rev 01) :00:12.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10) :01:00.0 Class 0300: 5333:8a10 (rev 04) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: My sound card wasn't recognized. I thought the dialog for the partition disk a little confuse. I mean, where is the correct option to choose, because I wanted to change my partition table. That's it. -- jupercio juliano Usuário de software livre: Jabber: jupercio at jabber.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of discover1_1.6.4_i386.changes
discover1_1.6.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: discover1_1.6.4.dsc discover1_1.6.4.tar.gz discover1_1.6.4_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.6.4_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.6.4_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.6.4_i386.deb discover1-udeb_1.6.4_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Processed: Re: Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.s0.1
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:26:25AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:19:30 +0100, > Colin Watson wrote: > > We don't put libc6-udeb on floppies, or indeed on any initrd images; > > it's only ever retrieved from the CD or the network. Size constraints > > aren't a big deal in this case. > > OK, I put into libc-udeb.install: > > debian/tmp-libc/lib/libutil* lib > > It will be in 2.3.2.ds1-14. Thanks. The bug report also mentions libcrypt, though. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Categorizing installation reports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 243997 [i386] [beta3] [CD] Unable to mount CD-ROM Bug#243997: installation report: unable to mount CD-ROM Changed Bug title. > retitle 244052 [sparc] [beta3] [netinst] Installer runs, but console is frozen Bug#244052: debian-installer problem on Sun Ultra Sparc 1 - installation report Changed Bug title. > retitle 244146 [i386] [beta3] [netinst] Error while starting PCMCIA Bug#244146: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. > retitle 244205 [i386] [beta3] [netinst] Some general issues (not directly d-i > related) Bug#244205: sarge Changed Bug title. > retitle 244259 [i386] [beta3] [netinst] 2nd stage package installation usability > issues Bug#244259: Installation report i386 beta3: Success Changed Bug title. > retitle 244323 [i386] [beta3] [netinst] xfs on / : lilo fails to install Bug#244323: Installation on Thinkpad T41 Changed Bug title. > retitle 244367 [ppc] [22040417] [floppy] Mostly successful - still some problems Bug#244367: PowerPC install from boot floppy mostly successful - still some problems. Changed Bug title. > retitle 244451 [i386] [several/beta3] [netinst/businesscard] Fails to mount CD Bug#244451: Installation Report; Failed Changed Bug title. > retitle 244539 [ppc] [20040416] [netinst] firewire not supported Bug#244539: installation-reports Changed Bug title. > retitle 244642 [i386] [20040417] [jigdo] Mostly successful, some glitches Bug#244642: Install report sarge-i386-1 (20040417) Changed Bug title. > retitle 244665 [i386] [20040418] [netinst] 8139too not loaded after reboot Bug#244665: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. > retitle 244775 [i386] [beta3] [netinst] VIA Rhine NIC support missing (no followup > by submitter) Bug#244775: VIA Rhine NIC support missing in Installer beta 3 Changed Bug title. > retitle 244884 [i386] [20040417] [netinst] Successful with usability comments Bug#244884: Sarge Installation Report Changed Bug title. > retitle 244974 [sparc] [20040420] [netboot] Kernel panic during boot Bug#244974: installation report: sparc ultra2 Changed Bug title. > retitle 245025 [i386] [beta3] [netinst] Success Bug#245025: INSTALL REPORT Changed Bug title. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > retitle 245141 [i386] [20040419] [hd-media] Lots of comments, looks like no open > issues Bug#245141: Bugs in various documents, bugs with partitioning, bugs with LVM, bugs with mkinitrd. Changed Bug title. > retitle 245235 [i386] [20040421] [netinst] Some HW-support issues (SATA, 8139too, > sound) Bug#245235: installation report (d-i 20040421) Changed Bug title. > retitle 245295 [i386] [beta3] [hd-media] partman: Error trying to use partition used > to boot d-i Bug#245295: installer beta 3 bug - could not mount partition Changed Bug title. > retitle 245296 [i386] [20040421] [netinst?] Got stuck after skipping network > configuration Bug#245296: Installer don't install and fails to load 3c59x module Changed Bug title. > retitle 245384 [i386] [beta3] [businesscard] Successful, 8139too not loaded after > reboot Bug#245384: Changed Bug title. > retitle 245393 [i386] [beta3] [netboot] Soekris net4800 (embedded box): success > after workarounds Bug#245393: Soekris net4800 Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#256405: crash displaying main menu in arabic
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:09:01PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Yes, if the absence of glyphs can cause crashes, the most likely source > > of trouble is that some sequence in the iso-scan main menu string is > > shaped to a code point that's missing from > > installer/build/needed-characters/ar. This *should* have been a > > complete list of all characters generated by the shaping code, but it's > > not impossible that I missed one. > How would I go about tracking this down? Bear in mind that I know beans about > this stuff. ... ah, but of course if there's only one string of interest, the binary search would be very short. ;) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#256405: crash displaying main menu in arabic
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:09:01PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Yes, if the absence of glyphs can cause crashes, the most likely source > > of trouble is that some sequence in the iso-scan main menu string is > > shaped to a code point that's missing from > > installer/build/needed-characters/ar. This *should* have been a > > complete list of all characters generated by the shaping code, but it's > > not impossible that I missed one. > How would I go about tracking this down? Bear in mind that I know beans about > this stuff. Trivially, figure out which menu items appear in the iso-scan main menu that don't appear in the main menu for other images; then remove the Arabic translations for those menu items, rebuild, and test to confirm whether the crash still occurs. If it doesn't crash, binary searching will pinpoint the problematic string. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245025: marked as done (INSTALL REPORT)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:45:44 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line INSTALL REPORT has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 02:50:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 20 19:50:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 160.red-80-24-103.pooles.rima-tde.net (galaxy-net.org) [80.24.103.160] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BG7oH-0005DV-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:50:02 -0700 Received: from www.galaxy-net.org ([127.0.0.1]) by galaxy-net.org for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with eXtremail; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 04:52:42 +2GMT Received: from 10.0.0.2 (auth. user [EMAIL PROTECTED]@localhost) by www.galaxy-net.org with HTTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:52:42 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: INSTALL REPORT Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:52:42 +0100 X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.10 (On: www.galaxy-net.org) From: "Robert Cambridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bounce-To: "Robert Cambridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Errors-To: "Robert Cambridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netin= =3D st.iso 11-04-04 uname -a: Linux mago 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Method: Boot "boot" and "root" floppies, install off net with standard RTL 8139 ethernet card using static LAN IP. No proxy Machine: PC? Processor: Intel P4 2000MHz (1999MHz) Memory: 256MB Root Device: one HDD, one CDROM, both IDE Root Size/partition table: Device FS Desc Primary: /dev/hda1 vfat WindowsXP root *Extended* Logical: /dev/hda5 ext3 Debian root (mount: /) /dev/hda6 vfat Data partition (mainly audio, video and images) /dev/hda7 ext3 mount: /boot /dev/hda8 none My other distro (yet to be installed, will be Gentoo) Output of lspci: mago:~# lspci pcilib: Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices :00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS645 Host & Memory & AGP Controller (rev 02) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] Virtual PCI-to-PCI bridge (AGP) :00:02.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS85C503/5513 (LPC Bridge) :00:02.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 07) :00:02.3 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 07) :00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] (rev d0) :00:02.7 Multimedia audio controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] Sound Controller (rev a0) :00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) :00:09.0 USB Controller: OPTi Inc. 82C861 (rev 20) :00:09.1 USB Controller: OPTi Inc. 82C861 (rev 20) :00:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq 5880 AudioPCI (rev 02) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV25 [GeForce4 Ti 4600] (rev a3) mago:~# Base System Installation Checklist: [O] =3D3D OK, [E] =3D3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D3D didn't try = it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Explained below Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: I downloaded the Sarge Base Install CD, which as the name says, includes the base of Debian within the CD. I could not boot this disk -not that my BIOS doesn't support it, but the disk didn't appear to be bootable-, so I wrote the floppy images "boot", "root" and "cd-drivers" contained on this disk, and booted from these. The CD-ROM was detected OK, but I chose the "testing" -options were "stable", "testing" and "unstable"- distribution in the installation, and when it came to installing the Debian Base, I got an error like so: "Co
Bug#244104: marked as done (Installation report for Apple Xserve rev. 2)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:58:58 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Installation report for Apple Xserve rev. 2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2004 17:11:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 16 10:11:10 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail44-s.fg.online.no [148.122.161.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BEWru-0002cq-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:11:10 -0700 Received: from reliant (ti211310a080-11430.bb.online.no [83.108.44.166]) by mail44.fg.online.no (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3GHB4Dd028364 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:11:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reliant (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046926C08A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:11:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gan.no (intellistation.fagerli-oomen.no [192.168.1.1]) by reliant (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCB96C089 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:10:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:10:54 +0200 From: Pip Oomen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6a (Windows/20040415) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installation report for Apple Xserve rev. 2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at piprograms.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: self-built (unstable) netboot image, checked out 2004-04-16, 06:00 CET uname -a: Linux ganymedes 2.4.25-powerpc #1 ven avr 2 22:32:38 CEST 2004 ppc GNU/Linux Date: 2004-04-16, 11:15 CET Method: netboot, using i386/DHCPd V3 + oldworld tftpd (builder) Machine: Apple Xserve rev. 2 Processor: Dual MacRISC3, 1.3GHz Memory: 1.5Gb Root Device: /dev/hda3 Root Size/partition table: /dev/hda1 Apple_partition_map Apple 63 @ 1 ( 31.5k) Partition map /dev/hda2 Apple_Bootstrap untitled1954 @ 64 (977.0k) NewWorld bootblock /dev/hda3 Apple_Bootstrap untitled 360878907 @ 2018 (172.1G) NewWorld bootblock /dev/hda4 Apple_UNIX_SVR2 swap 1001155 @ 360880925 (488.8M) Linux swap /dev/hda2, yaboot (manual creation, see below) /dev/hda3, root partition /dev/hda4, swap Output of lspci: 00:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 AGP 00:10.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 02) 10:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc.: Unknown device 0035 10:0d.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 21154 PCI-to-PCI Bridge 10:11.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 21154 PCI-to-PCI Bridge 10:15.0 RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20271 (rev 03) 10:1b.0 RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20271 (rev 03) 11:07.0 Class ff00: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo Mac I/O (rev 03) 11:08.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo USB 11:09.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo USB 12:02.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV100 QY [Radeon 7000/VE] 12:03.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1010 66MHz Ultra3 SCSI Adapter (rev 01) 12:03.1 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1010 66MHz Ultra3 SCSI Adapter (rev 01) 22:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc.: Unknown device 0036 22:0d.0 Class ff00: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 ATA/100 22:0e.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 FireWire (rev 01) 22:0f.0 Ethernet controller: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 GMAC (Sun GEM) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [E] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[E] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Bug#243914: marked as done (Installation Report)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:43:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Installation Report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2004 14:29:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 15 07:29:27 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 86.80-202-146.nextgentel.com (mental.mine.nu) [80.202.146.86] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BE7rr-0005K8-00; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:29:27 -0700 Received: from darkone by mental.mine.nu with local (Exim 4.21) id 1BE7rq-0003zd-2X for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:29:26 +0200 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:29:26 +0200 From: =?unknown-8bit?Q?J=F8rgen_P=2E_Tjern=F8?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installation Report Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgen_P=2E_Tjern=F8=2C=2C=2C?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 15th of April, 2004 (http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/) uname -a: Linux insane.mental.mine.nu 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i586 GNU/Linux Date: 15th of April, 2004 Approximately 13:00, GMT+1 Method: I booted and installed via a Net Image (the 30mb one), and then used apt-get with both Norwegian mirrors and the .debian.org Sweden mirror. No proxy. Machine: Old Pentium. Processor: Pentium 133 mhz Memory: 32mb Root Device: IDE, hda Root Size/partition table: / is ext3 - 464M, 64mb swap. Output of lspci: pcilib: Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430HX - 82439HX TXC [Triton II] (rev 03) :00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] (rev 01) :00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II] :00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) :00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c900 10BaseT [Boomerang] :00:0b.0 VGA compatible controller: Cirrus Logic GD 5446 Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [o] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: It all went smooth, no problems encountered. Only thing was that I didn't find anywhere I could tell it NOT to install pcmcia-stuff? Since my machine has no use for PCMCIA at all, I think it's quite useless that it installs PCMCIA ;) --- Received: (at 243914-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:44:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 10:44:14 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bknni-0005Xm-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:44:14 -0700 Received: from galadriel.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.21] ident=fjp) by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BknnD-WN-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:43:43 +0200 From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installation Report Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:43:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Closing this report as su
Bug#250027: no rarp for i386
Your grep for rarp support in the config shows it's unset for all the i386 kernels used for d-i, and I doubt this will change unless the kernel people are asked to change it. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#240240: marked as done (package install-doc)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:40:35 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2004 12:12:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 26 04:12:35 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mx02.komtel.net [212.7.146.1] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B6qCQ-0006Lf-00; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:12:35 -0800 Received: from rechner1 (iD4CC1515.versanet.de [212.204.21.21]) by mx02.komtel.net (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id AJY13254 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:11:58 +0100 (CET) From: "Ralph Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: package install-doc Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:28:28 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: install.doc Version: 3.0.24 Hi, in chapter 8.1 you wrote: If you have a diskless workstation booting from harddrive isn't a usefull option, so this step isn't wrote on. But I have a harddrive in my workstation/desktop and I would like know how I make my system bootable Greetings Ralph Hoffmann --- Received: (at 240240-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:42:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 10:42:40 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BknmC-0005Vh-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:42:40 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A276181CD for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:41:04 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1DA336E534; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:40:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:40:35 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This seems out of date (8.1 says nothing of the kind). --=20 see shy jo --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9XATd8HHehbQuO8RAnimAKDcPLMm58y1TLAgYr37rCEGJcRHXgCg6kvA npiWOCUpD9FsQY4sKQXMg48= =fCge -END PGP SIGNATURE- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 232252 to should document how to pxe boot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 232252 should document how to pxe boot Bug#232252: PXE Netboot report - fails to install kernel in base system install -> lilo fails Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 246890 to bad links to images, tagging 246890, tagging 248067, tagging 248261, tagging 249305 ... ... ... ... ... ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 246890 bad links to images Bug#246890: Installation Manual Changed Bug title. > tags 246890 d-i Bug#246890: bad links to images Tags were: d-i Tags added: d-i > tags 248067 d-i Bug#248067: Installation manual says Ctrl-Alt-Del will shut down PPC system There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > tags 248261 d-i Bug#248261: Problem in hppa.xml There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > tags 249305 d-i Bug#249305: Document partman There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > tags 255821 d-i Bug#255821: section on booting with grub should talk about initrd sizes Tags were: d-i Tags added: d-i > tags 250025 d-i Bug#250025: debian-installer-manual: Is there RARP support for arm There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > tags 250026 d-i Bug#250026: debian-installer-manual: Is there RARP support for hppa Tags were: patch Tags added: d-i > tags 250027 d-i Bug#250027: debian-installer-manual: Is there RARP support for i386 There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > tags 250028 d-i Bug#250028: debian-installer-manual: Is there RARP support for ia64 There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > tags 250029 d-i Bug#250029: debian-installer-manual: Is there RARP support for m68k There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 230552, tagging 232252
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 230552 d-i Bug#230552: should explain that discover and hotplug are used for hardware detection on installed system, and how to turn that off Tags were: d-i Tags added: d-i > tags 232252 d-i Bug#232252: should document how to pxe boot There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 230552 to should explain that discover and hotplug are used for hardware detection on installed system, and how to turn that off
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 230552 should explain that discover and hotplug are used for hardware > detection on installed system, and how to turn that off Bug#230552: installation report: IBM Thinkpad X23 Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#231380: marked as done (devfs devices names are confusing to skilled users)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:25:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2004 20:34:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 05 12:34:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c7-ctn-85.dial-up.net (linux.owlsbarn.rivera.za.net) [196.26.20.85] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AoqDA-0006YS-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 12:34:57 -0800 Received: (qmail 13001 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Feb 2004 20:35:14 - Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 22:34:52 +0200 From: Stefano Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation-reports Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Organization: Hybrid Computer Solutions X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.frogfoot.net/~owlsbarn/stefano.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 20040204 businesscard from gluck uname -a: can't get far enough for that... Date: Thu Feb 5 22:25:39 SAST 2004 Method: businesscard iso. Machine: Custom Processor: AMD XP 1700+ Memory: 768 MB DDR Root Device: IDE /dev/hda Root Size/partition table: 6GB. The rest is LVM Output of lspci: can't get far enough for that... Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [ ] Config network: [ ] Detect CD: [E] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it Comments/Problems: My machine has a HP CD-Writer 9300i as /dev/hdd. A linux boot doesn't work unless I append "hdd=3Dnoprobe hdd=3Dcdrom". Doing this had no effect with the sarge installer. I tried (in expert mode) adding "hdd=3Dnone" to all ide-detect, and ide-cd, but they don't take this argument happily. I think we need a way to get those arguments (from the boot line) passed on to the relevent modules... I am at a loss, and installing from woody. SR --=20 +-+ | Stefano Rivera http://rivera.za.net | | H: +27 21 794 7937() ASCII Ribbon Campaign:| | C: +27 72 419 8559/\ Say "No!" to HTML email. | +-+ Given enough time and money, eventually Microsoft will re-invent UNIX. --- Received: (at 231380-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:26:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 10:26:33 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BknWa-0003C2-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:26:32 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C9F1902A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:25:31 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E25776E534; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:25:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:25:03 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Conte
Bug#238557: marked as done (Hebrew appears left-to-right)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:17:29 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2004 17:09:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 17 09:09:45 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from upn1-25.ajusco.upn.mx (shmate.cabraslocas.upn.mx) [200.23.113.25] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B3eY5-000839-00; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:09:45 -0800 Received: by shmate.cabraslocas.upn.mx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E0053233BD; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:04:26 -0600 (CST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Hebrew appears left-to-right X-Mailer: reportbug 2.53 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:04:26 -0600 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Tags: l10n The Hebrew option on debian-installer shows characters written left-to-right - They should appear right-to-left. I am using Beta3 on i386. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-shmate Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US --- Received: (at 238557-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:17:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 10:17:27 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BknNn-000284-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:17:27 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F71900A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:17:56 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 38BD36E534; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:17:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:17:29 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: done Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have BIDI support now, at least for the first stage. --=20 see shy jo --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9Wqod8HHehbQuO8RAlNcAKDZ0LKnqpJeYZt+4GT9pMe+EhIEDwCg6yYp SyIrX63kTo9HJbPl3M6qhto= =odbK -END PGP SIGNATURE- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#253408: marked as done (debian-installer: Can not use fdisk /dev/hda in command line interface)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:25:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2004 09:11:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 09 02:11:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BXz78-0003oH-00; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 02:11:18 -0700 Received: from nk210-202-39-1.vdsl.static.apol.com.tw ([192.168.1.14]) [210.202.39.1] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BXz72-0003ui-00; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 04:11:12 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tetralet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: debian-installer: Can not use fdisk /dev/hda in command line interface X-Mailer: reportbug 2.60 Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:10:07 +0800 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: debian-installer Severity: minor I use sarge-i386 cd as the rescue cd. I find that we can not partition disk just using 'fdisk /dev/hda'. We should use 'fdisk /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disk' instead. It is a little too lengthy. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 --- Received: (at 231380-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:26:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 10:26:33 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BknWa-0003C2-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:26:32 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C9F1902A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:25:31 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E25776E534; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:25:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:25:03 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The devfs names are not visible any more in the installer GUI. --=20 see shy jo --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9Wxvd8HHehbQuO8RAtsRAKDqBaD+txPwMTICRA5/uEYRKVsAqgCfUWyS CyIhykiWtWz3JsQfcRTZcmQ= =zMzP -END PGP SIGNATURE- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#228638: marked as done (installer not working properly on oldworld powerpc)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:21:54 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2004 23:16:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 19 15:16:33 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sunsite.dcc.uchile.cl [192.80.24.2] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AiidE-0004g6-00; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:16:33 -0800 Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.80.24.3] by sunsite.dcc.uchile.cl (8.8.5/Main-DCCV8-Jo6) id UAA13241; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:16:23 -0300 (CDT) Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by anakena.dcc.uchile.cl (8.8.5/MainSec-DCCV8-Jo5) id UAA06618; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:16:21 -0300 (CLST) X-Authentication-Warning: anakena.dcc.uchile.cl: rabarca owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:16:21 -0300 (CLST) From: Rolando Abarca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installer not working properly on oldworld powerpc Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: Package: debian-installer Version: (unknown, from sarge netinstall cd) After booting into linux, right after starting the installer the screen goes to black. If I switch to other console it works, I can see the process running and kill the installer, it will start automatically again in that console, but with serious graphical glitches (not highlighting the current choice, not responding to keyboard, and things like that). My machine is a PowerMac 7200/120, booting with BootX, using kernel 2.4.22-powerpc-small (the one that comes in the netinstall cd doesn't work), the ramdisk (root.bin) is the one that comes in the cd. Checking "no video driver" in BootX does not help. salud! (cheers!) funkaster = (person *)malloc(sizeof(person)*curr_age+2); --- Received: (at 228638-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:21:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 10:21:53 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BknS5-0002uP-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:21:53 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C97918FF7 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:22:22 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8B8346E534; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:21:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:21:54 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As far as I can see, this bug log indicates the bug is fixed. --=20 see shy jo --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9Wuyd8HHehbQuO8RAseGAKDBX+LNtRdG5NHWWuvhDIcRNILz4ACbBnv9 A9AuiMjxwWsyuzH8SRRPYPk= =v2HS -END PGP SIGNATURE- --huq684BweRXVnRxX-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#257118: marked as done (debian-installer: update www.d.o/devel/debian-installer)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:29:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2004 10:03:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 01 03:03:41 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BfyPt-0007zr-00; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 03:03:41 -0700 Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 48B57181F; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:03:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:03:40 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debian-installer: update www.d.o/devel/debian-installer Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist Hello, The most recent news at http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ is about Beta4, it is from april. It would be nice if it was updated with RC1 (or even RC2 :-) Cheers Geert Stappers --IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA4+F8OSINbgwa/7sRArMVAKDBAki3yivA2dChvi0/l8jLACDz/ACeI5Xg +lwRVSxeuSRpkL9Fhg65SJk= =m4NV -END PGP SIGNATURE- --IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+-- --- Received: (at 257118-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:29:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 10:29:43 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BknZf-0003Vt-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:29:43 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E289218B29 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:30:12 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D1B16E534; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:29:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:29:45 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The web site will be kept up to date, there's no need for a bug to remind me. --=20 see shy jo --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9W2Id8HHehbQuO8RAvzlAKCKW/4Jf1BHSZe5EKIR63s4wUvNrgCgwcUo D6XciG2dty7m9QnC4CRuzjI= =tLp6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#254830: marked as done (Please include firewire for network installs)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:29:11 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line firewire network has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2004 07:55:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 17 00:55:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BarkZ-0007ne-00; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:55:55 -0700 Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.242]) by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5H7to6v028535 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:55:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: from pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.99]) by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BBAC585 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237) id 277045F39; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:55:45 +0200 From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please include firewire for network installs Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2 (mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41]); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:55:50 +0200 (MEST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist I have a USB/Firewire combo card in my alpha. Under 2.4.26 I can get a network interface by simply inserting eth1394 and ohci1394 (and then, as usual, bringing it up with ifconfig). This interface has been sucessfully used to transfere >1 GB from my PPC based ibook. So Ethernet over Firewire seems to work at least on alpha and ppc (and, according to reports on the net, also on x86). Hence it would be great, if debian-installer offered to probe for firewire as well, so installs over firewire would be possible. Given that three archs support it and the extra effort is quite limited, even if only few people might use it, it would enhance the *coolness* quite a lot (especially=20 given all the serious discussions about patents, freenes, etc.). Btw. the driver author has a @debian-address as well :-)) This is what lspci says about my Firewire: :01:05.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB22/A IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) (prog-if +10 [OHCI]) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 24 Memory at 09006000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=3D2K]= =20 Memory at 0900 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=3D16K] Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux 2.4.21-pre1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --=20 --=20 Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] er.de gpg signed mail preferredgpg-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] er.de 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreu= tzm Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/ --2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD4DBQFA0U6ARsxcY/MYpWoRAiDBAJ0YzLep3OaMShDrdKVnBzhQUylLogCYrub+ vhGDfiDFhVZd73nwILIE3w== =Ps9/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a-- --- Received: (at 254830-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:29:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTE
Bug#242021: marked as done (back to main menu after reading net-drivers.floppy (2004-04-04, oldworld ppc, netinstall with floppies))
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:16:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2004 11:36:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 04 04:36:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de (natsmtp00.webmailer.de) [81.169.145.165]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BA5vY-0003p7-00; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 04:36:36 -0700
Received: from matrix.mein.net (c144152.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.144.152])
by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i34BaYCN000519
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 13:36:34 +0200 (MEST)
From: Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: back to main menu after reading net-drivers.floppy (2004-04-04, oldworld ppc,
netinstall with floppies)
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 13:36:20 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1
Package: debian-installer
Hi,
> I just tried the floppies from
> http://people.debian.org/~luther/debian-installer/daily-powerpc-built/curre
>nt/powerpc-small/floppy/ which were built (or copied there) on 03-Apr-2004
> 09:01.
Now I've also tried
http://people.debian.org/~luther/debian-installer/daily-powerpc-built/2004.04.04/powerpc-small/flop
and get the same results as with 2004-03-04:
> Still no luck with the bootfloppy. Same as yesterday (but I only tried
> three floppy discs six times...) : The mac-tux gets black, the floppy
> ejected, the system freezes. So I took Jeremie boot-floppy again...
Only took three floppies this time ;-) One medium was faulty the other two
diffed ok. Anyway...
> The new root.img of yours now works again, fine.
>
> But after loading the net-drivers floppy the installations get thrown into
> d-i main menu, prompting me to select my keyboard. Which I have already
> done, but if I select to choose my keyboard, nothing happens. So I continue
> with detecting network hardware, but with an english keyboard layout now.
>
> Detecting network hardware, then network settings works fine and the
> installation continues. Since the base-install takes about an hour I don't
> now (yet) how it will continue...
>
>
> So, should 241847 be closed now and another one opened for getting thrown
> back to the main menu ?
>
> (Installation on Powermac 4400/200 with 48mb ram)
So this is the new bug report.
The 2004-04-04 installation is still ongoing, with 2004-04-03 I still had the
bug #241228 ("You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version
2.4.25-powerpc-small. This will not work unless you have configured your boot
loader to use initrd...) which I thought was fixed with
base-installer_0.066_powerpc.changes ? I'll add info to bug#241228 if
2004-04-04 also shows this bug.
> regards,
> Holger
---
Received: (at 242021-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:16:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 10:16:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BknN3-0001uN-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:16:41 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61A01900A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:17:10 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id F1C3E6E534; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:16:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:16:42 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signa
Processed: reassign 250349 to di-utils-reboot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 250349 di-utils-reboot Bug#250349: Usability: CD-ROM related issues Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `di-utils-reboot'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 251424 to rootskel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 251424 rootskel Bug#251424: Please use a short alias for the "noframebuffer" option at boot Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `rootskel'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 226057 to hw-detect
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 226057 hw-detect Bug#226057: Installer doesn't handle the DMA-disabling boot options Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `hw-detect'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 236487 to kernel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 236487 kernel Bug#236487: keyboard does not work on dell dimension 8250 Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 238322
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 238322 moreinfo Bug#238322: Reboot hungs. After poweroff and poweron boots normally There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 239911 is wishlist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 239911 wishlist Bug#239911: needs e2fsck+badblocks support Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Processed: Re: Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.s0.1
At Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:19:30 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > No problem. But it increases libc6.udeb size. Is it acceptable for > > considering floppy size? > > We don't put libc6-udeb on floppies, or indeed on any initrd images; > it's only ever retrieved from the CD or the network. Size constraints > aren't a big deal in this case. OK, I put into libc-udeb.install: debian/tmp-libc/lib/libutil* lib It will be in 2.3.2.ds1-14. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#258500: is this a bug then?
It seems that the core of this bug is if anything, a linux kernel bug and should be reassigned to there. OTOH, it may not be a bug at all. I don't understand Josh's suggestion to use sata_sil instead of siimage. Are we loading the wrong module there? I'd like to get this bug reassigned to the appropriate package(s), whatever they may be. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#256405: crash displaying main menu in arabic
> Yes, if the absence of glyphs can cause crashes, the most likely source > of trouble is that some sequence in the iso-scan main menu string is > shaped to a code point that's missing from > installer/build/needed-characters/ar. This *should* have been a > complete list of all characters generated by the shaping code, but it's > not impossible that I missed one. How would I go about tracking this down? Bear in mind that I know beans about this stuff. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#250843: followup
Did you ever get anywhere on this tail problem? Can you still reproduce it? One possibility is something is creating a new /var/log/messages. busybox tail will not follow to new files. I saw this once when a broken anna re-installed the rootskel udeb, which includes an empty /var/log/messages, but that was code that is not in a released version of anna. But perhaps something similar is going on. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#256599: misaligned columns in partition overview
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:16:01AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:31:48AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-27 19:09]: > > > Notice how sda1's row is misaligned because it lacks a 'primary' or > > > 'logical' label. This was confusing to me because I thought that / would > > > not be formatted for some reason until I looked a bit closer. > > > > Any idea why it doesn't show primary or logical? > > I'm not sure. I had razed the partition table and created a primary > partition spanning the entire drive, so I expect it would have said > primary for sure. I guess that the first hard disk had a partition table with type "sun" (it doesn't support primary and logical partitions) and the second had a "msdos" partition table. On a partition tables without primary and logical partitions partman doesn't show primary/logical column in order to save space on the row for other things (for example for partition names). This is not a big problem for hard disks as it is not usual to use on one system different types of partition tables. It is a problem for the LVM and RAID "partitions" but the support of LVM and RAID in partman needs reimplementation anyway. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#250871: marked as done (install: detect network hardware has no abort)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:12:16 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 14:57:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 07:57:28 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.32] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSdMt-0005Rc-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 07:57:28 -0700 Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A1610D; Tue, 25 May 2004 16:56:57 +0200 (MST) Received: from mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.12.26]) by localhost (mx5 [134.2.12.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14664-04; Tue, 25 May 2004 16:56:55 +0200 (DFT) Received: from dual (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66]) by mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2430F149; Tue, 25 May 2004 16:56:53 +0200 (DFT) Received: from mrvn by dual with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BSdLf-0005fP-Da; Tue, 25 May 2004 14:56:11 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: install: detect network hardware has no abort X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59 Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 14:55:50 + Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (McAfee AntiVirus) at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: install Severity: normal The installer fails to detect any ethernet card and asks me to choose one of many modules. The default option is "none of the above". Since I don't want network I select "none of the above". Next it asks me if I want to load a module from a floppy, to which I say "no". Then I get a "No ethernet card was found on the system" error with only a "continue" button, which leads me right back restarting the circle. There is no way to escape and work without a network card. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-amd64 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 250871-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:12:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 10:12:15 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BknIl-0001kH-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:12:15 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D37E180A6 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:12:44 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF7616E534; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:12:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:12:16 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fixed in ddetect 0.102. --=20 see shy jo --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9Wlwd8HHehbQuO8RAo0NAJ9B7hsk9Tcvlcc+a1TFqlubVt
Processed: reassign 242343 to silo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 242343 silo Bug#242343: debian-installer beta 3 sparc netinst image failed to boot up on Ultra10 Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer,' to `silo'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 253916 to installation-reports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 253916 installation-reports Bug#253916: Debian Installer (Sarge) installation report (fwd) Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 244619 is wishlist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 244619 wishlist Bug#244619: There is a need for a method to prepare partitions manually. It is rather presumptious for d-i to think that Debian will only be installed on disk and d-i knows how to partition disks for every system. Probably we need a fake package providing partitions-mounted, fstab-created, etc. This would allow to use the installer also on s390 Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 254071
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 254071 moreinfo Bug#254071: debian-installer: installation 2.6 fails to detect SATA hd, no partitioning possible There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 256177 is wishlist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 256177 wishlist Bug#256177: want a way to load extra udebs from usb stick Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#253640: what do we need to fix this bug?
Do we need to get pci id information or something to fix this one? debian-installer seems like the wrong package for the bug now. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#255439: Bug#255689: Bug#255439: d-i report
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:08:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:05:51PM -0300, Cristian Escalante wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 04:09:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > > > The XFree86 X server used the driver it was told to use. > > > > > > There are only two ways you can tell the XFree86 X server which driver to > > > use in the d-i environment: > > > > > > 1) Answer a debconf question. > > > 2) Have the question pre-answered by discover. > > Actually, the question was answered by discover (from config script): > > > > mob:/# /sbin/discover --disable=serial,parallel --format="%V %M\t%S\t%D\n" video > > ATI Technologies, Inc. Radeon Mobility U1 XFree86 radeon > > There's the problem. "radeon" is not a legal value. > > Use "ati" instead. > > Do not use "atimisc", "r128", or "radeon". Clarification: Discover-data maintainers, This means you! -- G. Branden Robinson| I'm a firm believer in not drawing Debian GNU/Linux | trend lines before you have data [EMAIL PROTECTED] | points. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Tim Ottinger signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#239784: lspci/lspci -n
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 09:00:08AM +0200, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote: > The output of lspci itself is already included. Let me know if you > really need the lspci -n listing, I'll try to get access to the system > then to grab that output. Well, the thing is, I am 80% sure this bug is already fixed (Joey Hess reassigned it while he was triaging old and new installation reports.) lspci -n will guarantee that it is so, so I can check against the PCI IDs in our database. Thanks, -- Joshua Kwan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#256466: partman: 'Two file systems are assigned...' message misses value
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:57:41PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: > > I found a small problem in error message: > > Two file systems are assigned the same mount point (/): SCSI1 (0,0,0), > > partition #sda1 () and SCSI1 (0,1,0), partition #sdb1 (). > > I didn't check on dual IDE or mixture of IDE/SCSI, but maybe same > problem will occur. Did your SCSI disks have the same size? If yes, then this is probably the same bug as #241785 and I will wellcome if you can retry the installation and send /var/lib/partman. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#257302: xfree86: general complaint about XFree86 on Dell Latitude D400
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:22:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > The debconf reorg is scheduled, but I *don't* have plans to introduce a > > spurious dependency of xserver-xfree86 on discover, mdetect, or read-edid. > > Have you considered doing an xfree86-config package that is separate > from X and depends on the right set of tools? I like this, because it > allows for a xfree86-knoppix-config or whatever. > > > I thought it was agreed a long time ago that it really was the installer's > > job to get hardware autodetection tools onto the system. > > That's fine for general purpose hardware detection tools, but for things > like read-edid and mdetect, we either end up bloating systems with no X > with these tools, or we end up with unresolvable bugs like #250422. On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 09:00:21PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:22:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: [...] > Did the d-i team consider using the xdebconfigurator package? > > Description: A script used with debconf to autoconfigure xserver-xfree86 > A script-package used in conjunction with debconf to autoconfigure > xserver-xfree86. This script is supposed to help setup X correctly > even with DEBIAN_FRONTEND set to noninteractive. > > Just a thought, I haven't really seen it in action. I have no objection to this proposal. I'd be happy to work with the xdebconfigurator maintainer to ensure smooth interoperation. -- G. Branden Robinson| Software engineering: that part of Debian GNU/Linux | computer science which is too [EMAIL PROTECTED] | difficult for the computer http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | scientist. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#259407: network-console: zlib1g-udeb missing from (i386) CD images
reassign 259407 debian-cd thanks On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:37:47PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Package: network-console > Version: 0.0.1 > Severity: important > > Today I tried using network-console after an installation from the i386 > netinst CD. sshd complained of missing libz.so.1. > > From /var/log/syslog: > anna[4115]: DEBUG: resolver (zlib1g): package doesn't exist (ignored) > main-menu[500]: DEBUG: resolver (zlib1g): package doesn't exist (ignored) > > $ find /cdrom -name zlib1g* > /cdrom/pool/main/z/zlib/zlib1g_1.2.1.1-3_i386.deb > So the .deb is there, but the .udeb is missing. > The udeb will be needed for the ssh-client component as well. It's excluded by debian-cd. OK to commit this patch? Index: exclude-udebs === RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/debian-cd/data/sarge/exclude-udebs,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -p -u -r1.8 exclude-udebs --- exclude-udebs 13 Apr 2004 21:13:17 - 1.8 +++ exclude-udebs 14 Jul 2004 16:22:17 - @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb libpango1.0-udeb libpng12-0-udeb ttf-freefont-udeb -zlib1g-udeb # This udeb is not in good shape and is largely supersceded by # cdebconf-newt-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#259407: network-console: zlib1g-udeb missing from (i386) CD images
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 259407 debian-cd Bug#259407: network-console: zlib1g-udeb missing from (i386) CD images Bug reassigned from package `network-console' to `debian-cd'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#254286: installation-reports: two issues with debian-installer Test Candidate 1
Thanks for your installation report. On 13.VI.2004 you wrote: > > Once these modules were loaded, the RAIDed drives, NTFS partition, and > free space were detected correctly when the "Partition disks" step was > re-done. I was then able to create 2 new partitions, one for swap, and > the other for the ext3 file system. > > However, when restarting the install, it does not detect the partition > types of the two linux partitions after the insmod of ataraid and > medley. The partitioner sees the previously created partitions on the > striped set, but sets them to unused. Under Knoppix the ext3 partition > can be hand-mounted after installing the medley module. Could you explain what you mean by "it does not detect the partition types of the two linux partitions"? The normal behaviour is that the partitioner sees the partitions and the existing file system in them but doesn't set a mount point for them and the usage method is "don't use". The user has to change "don't use" to "format" or "use existing data" and to specify mount points manually as the installer can not remember the mount points from your previous install. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Beta 4 floppy/netboot installs no longer supported?! (was Re: ThinkPad 570 disc not detected)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 14 July 2004 17:24, Joey Hess wrote: > [...] You'll notice that a great many beta4 images are > broken, also including all the businesscards, for other reasons. In that case shouldn't we add a statement to that effect on the web page? If you just need an installation that works, we recommend you use beta4 of the installer, after checking its errata. The above obviously is no longer true and the errata don't list current problems. Maybe adding the following para would help. Note: Some of the Beta 4 boot images are currently broken because of kernel changes. We advise to use only the Beta 110 MB CD image and to use the daily builds (see below) for other installation methods. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9Vd0gm/Kwh6ICoQRAgR+AKDPX8PaYcMnUsWB4/b6B9lTxayLwwCfeN+M cDssZBRaMMsywt2HYiKDe9E= =4HLi -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#259420: partconf-mkfstab: S/390 creates /dev/dasdX fstab, but uses devfs-named devices
Package: partconf-mkfstab Version: 0.31 Severity: important When installing S/390 with debian-installer, I have swap on Partion 1 of device 0151. The fstab is written to use /dev/dasdb1, but when I IPL, I get a devfs-style device, /dev/dasd/0151/part1, and there is no /dev/dasdb1 device node. Either S/390 should not use devfs, or the fstab should be written to use devfs names. For some reason, /dev/dasda1, for the root partition, works fine even though there's no /dev/dasda or /dev/dasda1 node; I think this is because device 150, which is the first DASD listed in my parameter line, is the device I IPL from, and so when it's detected there's no way to tell whether it's going to be /dev/dasd/0150/disc or /dev/dasda. Adam -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing') Architecture: s390 Kernel: Linux 2.4.17 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Beta 4 floppy/netboot installs no longer supported?! (was Re: ThinkPad 570 disc not detected)
Frans Pop wrote: > Hmmm. He has a good point there. > In fact, IMHO it is pretty bad that we don't support the Beta4 floppy images > and netboot any more (20040430 is Beta4!). > This could cause a lot of unnecessary "failed installation" reports. > > Shouldn't we keep udebs for abandoned kernel versions available on the mirrors > a bit longer? I removed the old kernel udebs from sarge when I was under the mistaken impression that we were going to have a release within a week of DebConf4. These changes have to be made a little while before release. Of course the direct links to the beta4 floppy images were removed from the web site when I realised this had broken them, and when the release didn't happen. You'll notice that a great many beta4 images are broken, also including all the businesscards, for other reasons. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#259297: installation-report: Adaptec 2120S w/RAID5... installer fails to install grub
> Output of lspci: > Couldn't find the location of the command via a boot menu in the > installer... :( Here is the output of lspci after I was able to install LILO and bring this machine back up by itself. I am going to be using this machine as a replacement for my current workstation. I would like to help get GRUB working with this machines configuration, but I am afraid I will soon need to use this computer and will not be doing further testing of the debian-installer on it. So, I can wait and use this machine to test debian-installer but after, say 8 days, I will need to leave well enough alone and start using this machine for work. Thanks! Anyway, here is the output of lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. E7505 Memory Controller Hub (rev 03) :00:00.1 Class ff00: Intel Corp. E7000 Series RAS Controller (rev 03) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. E7000 Series Processor to AGP Controller (rev 03) :00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. E7000 Series Hub Interface B PCI-to-PCI Bridge (rev 03) :00:02.1 Class ff00: Intel Corp. E7000 Series Hub Interface B PCI-to-PCI Bridge RAS Controller (rev 03) :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02) :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02) :00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 02) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB/ER Hub interface to PCI Bridge (rev 82) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) LPC Bridge (rev 02) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) Ultra ATA 100 Storage Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBM (ICH4) SMBus Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 85) :02:1c.0 PIC: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 I/OxAPIC (rev 04) :02:1d.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 Hub PCI Bridge (rev 04) :02:1e.0 PIC: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 I/OxAPIC (rev 04) :02:1f.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 Hub PCI Bridge (rev 04) :03:01.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703X Gigabit Ethernet (rev 02) :03:02.0 RAID bus controller: Adaptec AAC-RAID (rev 01) :04:02.0 PCI bridge: Hint Corp HB6 Universal PCI-PCI bridge (non-transparent mode) (rev 15) :05:08.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41) :05:08.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41) :05:08.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 02) :05:0c.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB23 IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#255388: marked as done (debian installer not install LG HL-DT-ST RW/DVD GCC-4480B)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:10:33 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#255388: debian installer 20040712 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2004 15:41:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 20 08:41:10 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from orion.msrvs.net [216.180.242.122] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bc4RS-0002XW-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:41:10 -0700 Received: from [200.221.154.32] (helo=200.221.154.32) by orion.msrvs.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bc4RN-0005cd-P5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:41:06 -0300 From: Andre Felipe Machado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debian installer not install LG HL-DT-ST RW/DVD GCC-4480B Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:29:05 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - orion.msrvs.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - techforce.com.br X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Version: RC1 Using the debian-installer, RC1, contained in the ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/sarge/ dated 13 jun, AND net-inst RC1. The installer detects the LG ide cdrw/dvd, but fails to install. Tried expert mode too. Display: LG HL-DT-ST RW/DVD GCC-4480B At one console: missing modules ide-scsi If the drivers are on the cd, why they are not loaded? Maybe some drivers could be borrowed from Knoppix, as it detected ethernet card and cdrw/dvd. Regards. Andre Felipe Machado --- Received: (at 255388-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 15:11:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 08:11:05 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BklPV-0001LB-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:11:05 -0700 Received: from galadriel.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.21] ident=fjp) by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BklP0-KZ-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:10:34 +0200 From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#255388: debian installer 20040712 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:10:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Andre Felipe Machado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: On Wednesday 14 July 2004 15:55, you wrote: > Hello, Frans > Many thanks for your message. > The bug report is being evolving through some debian installer versions, > with changing results each round, for the same primary problem. > I am totally new to debian. > Trying to install into a fat32 partition alongside with Conectiva Linux 10 > at another partition at my home machine. > The d-i initially did not detect the LG CDRW-DVD drive nor the eth card. > Then it listed but did not installed it with varying results from d-i > version to version. > Now, it installed the net card (done) and SOME of the modules for th
Re: Install to SATA with ICH5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 14 July 2004 16:28, Timo Veith wrote: > The installer doesn't find the disks nor the controller. I also tried to > change the bios setting from auto to compatibilty mode. No go. Please submit an installation report using [1] and attach the files syslog, messages and partman from /var/log. That will give us the information we need to help you. [1] http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/report-template TIA, FJP -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9U3sgm/Kwh6ICoQRAtlSAKCTTMEhH/fkXYJjVwhIUBGQSstQxgCfQE0k LmyX/LHsJcMqlxiMQsH4gqA= =PH+v -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#252204: install: Installer format fails
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:17:09PM -0400, Terence wrote: > > No matter how I parition the harddrive, partman just say "format > failed" and return me back to partman again. I look at the log. It > says Cannot find reiserfs fs on /dev/hda1. I'd like to ask also whether you had mounted some partition or done some other stuf manually? Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#252204: install: Installer format fails
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:17:09PM -0400, Terence wrote: > > No matter how I parition the harddrive, partman just say "format > failed" and return me back to partman again. I look at the log. It > says Cannot find reiserfs fs on /dev/hda1. If you are able to retry the installation please try to reproduce this error and then send us the file /var/log/partman. > I suspect that it is due to the fact that my old bios (sorry no new > bios is available) cannot support harddrive bigger than 8.4gb. I think that your old BIOS is not a problem as Linux doesn't use BIOS in order to access the hard disks. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: d-i dated 2004 07 13 failled to boot on a sparc sunblade 100
Hello Frederik, [...] > > Finaly I download the last sarges-netinstall.iso dated of this 2004 > > 07 13 where the kernel (the 2.4.26) panic also because: > > [...] > > RAMDISK:Couldn't find valid RAM Disk image starting at 0. > > ... > > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs. > > > > Any idea (boot net?)? > > You probably tried the sarge_d-i branch: > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/20040713/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso > There was in fact in: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/ tree :) > Try instead the sid_d-i branch: > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040713/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso > > Let us know if it works. And just launch it but still failled at the same place with same message (Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs.) umm as said, i am not familiar with d-i (that is a long time that I installed my woody pc and pre-woody hppa boxes, so I don't remember all details :( ), but I don't understand this message: just after "ENTER" to start the install a ramdisk is well found and loaded, then during the load of the kernel, this one tries again to load (i suppose another) ramdisk which this time it doesn't find? The questions are: a) does it need this second ramdisk? b) if yes where is it supposed to look for on the cd, in the first ramdisk? Thanks again for your quick answer, Joel --- Tiscali ADSL LIGHT, 19,95 EUR/mois pendant 6 mois, c'est le moment de faire le pas! http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr
Install to SATA with ICH5
Hi list, I know that there are workarounds for this problem but from what I have read from http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianInstallerFAQ, question 8, it should work with the newest installier image. I tried to install on a Supermicro Barebone Superserver 5013CTB, Intel Chipset 875P with the daily sarge-i386-netinst.iso image from 2004-07-12. The installer doesn't find the disks nor the controller. I also tried to change the bios setting from auto to compatibilty mode. No go. Knoppix 3.4 finds the ICH5 SATA Controller, even with auto mode. So I thought this might be of interest. Kind regards, Timo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259374: Install report
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:45:22PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I cannot setup LVM during install time. > There is no place to specify mount point and filesystem type to logical volume. If you choose a logical volume, you will probably see something like Usage method: unused Can you confirm that if you change "unused" to "format", you will be allowed to specify mount point and file system type. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259407: network-console: zlib1g-udeb missing from (i386) CD images
Package: network-console Version: 0.0.1 Severity: important Today I tried using network-console after an installation from the i386 netinst CD. sshd complained of missing libz.so.1. From /var/log/syslog: anna[4115]: DEBUG: resolver (zlib1g): package doesn't exist (ignored) main-menu[500]: DEBUG: resolver (zlib1g): package doesn't exist (ignored) $ find /cdrom -name zlib1g* /cdrom/pool/main/z/zlib/zlib1g_1.2.1.1-3_i386.deb So the .deb is there, but the .udeb is missing. The udeb will be needed for the ssh-client component as well. Installation info: - i386 - netinst CD sid_d-i 20040712
Bug#255388: debian installer 20040712
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 13:35, Andre Felipe Machado wrote: > Hello, > One more log file from 20040712 try. > Andre Felipe Hello Andre Felipe, I have read through the history of this bug report, but I'm afraid with all the different tries, it is not very clear any more what your problem is exactly. Could you try the installation again using the current images from [1] and submit a _new_ bug report using the template from [2]? Please: - mention complete URL of the image you used - explain where the install failed - explain what you were trying to do (for example: are you trying to configure LVM or just partition your disk?) - attach the following logfiles from /var/log (or /var/log/debian-installer): syslog, messages, partman If you are testing on different systems, please use different reports for each system. I would like to close the current installation report. Can you let me know if that's OK with you. Thank you very much for your efforts in testing d-i! FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#251536: A Swedish task
tag 251536 + patch tag 251536 - help thanks Attached is a patch to add a Swedish task. I didn't include the OpenOffice.org l10n stuff though since it depends on the whole OpenOffice.org package, which I don't think should be installed automatically just because the user selects Swedish as the language. #202907 will have to be solved first. -- Pelle diff -urN tasksel-2.04/tasks/swedish tasksel-2.04-swedish/tasks/swedish --- tasksel-2.04/tasks/swedish 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ tasksel-2.04-swedish/tasks/swedish 2004-07-13 21:20:20.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +Task: swedish +Test-lang: sv +Section: l10n +Description: Swedish environment + This task installs packages and documentation in Swedish + to help Swedish speaking people use Debian. +Maintainer: Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Key: + locales +Packages: + util-linux-locales + wswedish + iswedish + aspell-sv + myspell-sv-se + kde-i18n-sv + koffice-i18n-sv + doc-linux-sv-html
Processed: A Swedish task
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 251536 + patch Bug#251536: need a Swedish task Tags were: help Tags added: patch > tag 251536 - help Bug#251536: need a Swedish task Tags were: patch help Tags removed: help > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: d-i dated 2004 07 13 failled to boot on a sparc sunblade 100
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 14 July 2004 12:43, Joel Soete wrote: > Hi all, > > I am not very familiar with d-i and less with sparc arch but a > colleage of mine ask me to test a linux its sunblade :) > After the download of the woody the install start to failled becasue > of the know problem: > ?Fast access MMU Miss. > > I so try to download the sarges-netinstall.iso beta4 (May 2004) for > this platform but after ENTER to install the kernel (a 2.4.24 if a > read well) failled to boot because: > [...] > panic: no init found > > Finaly I download the last sarges-netinstall.iso dated of this 2004 > 07 13 where the kernel (the 2.4.26) panic also because: > [...] > RAMDISK:Couldn't find valid RAM Disk image starting at 0. > ... > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs. > > Any idea (boot net?)? You probably tried the sarge_d-i branch: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/20040713/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso Try instead the sid_d-i branch: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040713/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso Let us know if it works. - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9SvtLSX61ZxOtagRAoosAJ9NvNZMeAoD3cxrRo+DsWL8xtygQwCgo8G0 KMUGezOjAhRYXiDQuVXnjcc= =/wJl -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#255388: debian installer 20040712 logs => hw summary
Hello, I tried again with the cd image dated 20040712. Below is one of the logs. See that lspci nor hdparm were not found on cd. I hope this help. How could I catch these logs from a brazilian portuguese knoppix derivative (http://Kurumin.org) in order to list the packages that installer used succesfully? Regards. Andre Felipe info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;Unknown;HL-DT-ST RW/DVD GCC-4480B;/dev/hdb info: /bin/report-hw: discover: via-rhine;;;VIA Technologies, Inc.;VT6105 [Rhine-III]; info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ide-scsi;;;Linux;IDE-SCSI emulation layer; info: /bin/report-hw: discover: usb-ohci;;;Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS);USB 1.0 Controller; info: /bin/report-hw: discover: usb-ohci;;;Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS);USB 1.0 Controller; info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;Unknown;QUANTUM FIREBALL540A;/dev/hdd info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;Unknown;SAMSUNG SP4002H;/dev/hda error: /bin/report-hw: Unable to find lspci. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: PCI devices found: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Bus 0, device 0, function 0: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 745 Host (rev 1). info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Master Capable. Latency=32. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe800 [0xebff]. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Bus 0, device 1, function 0: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS 530 Virtual PCI-to-PCI bridge (AGP) (rev 0). info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Master Capable. No bursts. Min Gnt=8. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Bus 0, device 2, function 0: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS85C503/5513 (LPC Bridge) (rev 0). info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Bus 0, device 2, function 2: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 7). info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: IRQ 5. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Master Capable. Latency=32. Max Lat=80. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe680 [0xe6800fff]. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Bus 0, device 2, function 3: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (#2) (rev 7). info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: IRQ 9. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Master Capable. Latency=32. Max Lat=80. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe600 [0xe6000fff]. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Bus 0, device 2, function 5: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] (rev 208). info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Master Capable. Latency=128. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: I/O at 0xd800 [0xd80f]. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Bus 0, device 5, function 0: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Multimedia audio controller: C-Media Electronics Inc CM8738 (rev 16). info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: IRQ 10. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Master Capable. Latency=32. Min Gnt=2.Max Lat=24. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: I/O at 0xb000 [0xb0ff]. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Bus 0, device 11, function 0: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Modem: PCTel Inc HSP MicroModem 56 (rev 2). info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: IRQ 5. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: I/O at 0xa800 [0xa83f]. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Bus 0, device 12, function 0: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105 [Rhine-III] (rev 134). info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: IRQ 5. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Master Capable. Latency=32. Min Gnt=3.Max Lat=8. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: I/O at 0xa400 [0xa4ff]. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe580 [0xe58000ff]. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Bus 1, device 0, function 0: info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 MX 440] (rev 163). info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: IRQ 11. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Master Capable. Latency=64. Min Gnt=5.Max Lat=1. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe700 [0xe7ff]. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf000 [0xf7ff]. info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/pci: Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xef80 [0xef87]. info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: Module Size Used byNot tainted info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: raid1 10992 0 (unused) info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: raid0 2760 0 (unused) info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: md 55296 0 [raid1 raid0] info: /bin/report-hw: lsm
Re: LVM on SW RAID for sarge - success
George Karaolides wrote: I've just had success migrating Debian Sarge to root on LVM on RAID. Here's an account of what I've done. I believe this is interesting for many people. What about adding link to this article[1] in section Resources in d-i's page[2]? [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/07/msg01195.html [2] http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ Regards, ogi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Openssh-client component not available? (was Bug#259017: IDE hard-drive not being detected)
[I'm subscribed to debian-boot; the cc's unnecessary.] On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:48:27PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 14 July 2004 13:30, Colin Watson wrote: > > In lieu of that, I guess I could add an Installer-Menu-Item: field so > > that anna will offer it for retrieval in expert mode and an > > isinstallable maintainer script which always fails so that main-menu > > won't actually put it on the menu. Joey, how evil does that sound? > > Why not just include it in the menu? > Maybe as menu-item 960 (after "Execute a shell") with title "Activate ssh > support". That could (ask to?) install both server and client with > dependencies. Well, that's entirely different from menu-items in openssh-client-udeb, but: * Where would you put this question? * How would it activate ssh support? At the moment, you can't install additional installer components after anna has run, as far as I can see. * I don't think you'd want to install the server as well. The cases where you want an ssh server in the installer are very specialized, and they can have their own initrds (in fact, some of them already do). I can see the appeal of that kind of UI, though. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#233864: update
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 04:44:52PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > The man-db problems are resolved. Someone who knows powerpc should > check that the other problems reported in this one are fixed. We still need to document BootX. The kbd-chooser crash was solved long ago. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#255388: debian installer 20040712 logs => messages
Hello, One more log file from 20040712 try. Andre Felipe Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-core.o Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/usb/storage/usb-storage.o insmodide-core insmodscsi_mod insmodusb-storage Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/block/floppy.o insmodfloppy Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.o insmodvia82cxxx Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/trm290.o insmodtrm290 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/triflex.o insmodtriflex Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/slc90e66.o insmodslc90e66 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/sis5513.o insmodsis5513 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/siimage.o insmodsiimage Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/serverworks.o insmodserverworks Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/sc1200.o insmodsc1200 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/rz1000.o insmodrz1000 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/piix.o insmodpiix Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.o insmodpdc202xx_old Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/opti621.o insmodopti621 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/ns87415.o insmodns87415 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-disk.o Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/hpt366.o insmodide-disk insmodhpt366 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/hpt34x.o insmodhpt34x Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/generic.o insmodgeneric Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/cy82c693.o insmodcy82c693 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/cs5530.o insmodcs5530 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/cmd64x.o insmodcmd64x Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/cmd640.o insmodcmd640 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/amd74xx.o insmodamd74xx Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.o insmodalim15x3 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.o insmodaec62xx Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/adma100.o insmodadma100 Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.o insmodpdc202xx_new Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-detect.o insmodide-detect Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.o Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-cd.o insmodcdrom insmodide-cd Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/fs/isofs/isofs.o insmodisofs Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/lib/crc32.o Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/net/mii.o Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/net/via-rhine.o insmodcrc32 insmodmii insmodvia-rhine No matching physical volumes found No volume groups found Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Openssh-client component not available? (was Bug#259017: IDE hard-drive not being detected)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 14 July 2004 13:30, Colin Watson wrote: > In lieu of that, I guess I could add an Installer-Menu-Item: field so > that anna will offer it for retrieval in expert mode and an > isinstallable maintainer script which always fails so that main-menu > won't actually put it on the menu. Joey, how evil does that sound? Why not just include it in the menu? Maybe as menu-item 960 (after "Execute a shell") with title "Activate ssh support". That could (ask to?) install both server and client with dependencies. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA9R2Mgm/Kwh6ICoQRAlDeAJ9oJHjYEml/2CuPIbHo1rCxGn1N3wCghJgE VHMYZuUu/mOAWrkM77DUI1E= =s1Eh -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Processed: Categorizing #259373
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 259373 [i386] [Beta4] [netinst] Lots of usability comments Bug#259373: installation-reports Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Openssh-client component not available? (was Bug#259017: IDE hard-drive not being detected)
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 09:40:17PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 13 July 2004 13:15, Colin Watson wrote: > > It's not meant for this purpose. openssh-client-udeb (if all the > > dependencies are available as udebs now) is more what you want. > > How is one supposed to load this udeb? Well, it hasn't really been tested much yet, but ... > I've just tried a netboot and selected unstable for download of installer > components, but there is no line for anything like openssh-client (or > -server) in the list of available optional components. Hm. There seem to be five ways to get anna to select something for installation: * declare Enhances: on something that's already installed (will install the package by default, or at least it's supposed to, although I'm not sure I believe the code); * be a kernel module udeb; * be priority standard or above (will install the package by default); * be queued by something else using anna-install (will install the package by default); * provide a menu item. None of these exactly seem appropriate. Would anyone object if it became priority standard? I guess the lowmem people would be very unhappy with that. It would be good if anna-install could be souped up so that you could run it from the command line after anna runs the first time and have it retrieve and install a package and any necessary dependencies. It doesn't even seem necessarily too hard ... In lieu of that, I guess I could add an Installer-Menu-Item: field so that anna will offer it for retrieval in expert mode and an isinstallable maintainer script which always fails so that main-menu won't actually put it on the menu. Joey, how evil does that sound? > What are the dependencies (I noticed libcrypto is required which is not > present by default...)? libc6-udeb, libcrypto0.9.7-udeb, libnss-files-udeb, and zlib1g-udeb. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
