Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 259297 grub-installer Bug#259297: installation-report: Adaptec 2120S w/RAID5... installer fails to install grub Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'. tags 259297 d-i Bug#259297: installation-report: Adaptec 2120S w/RAID5... installer fails to install grub There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 259264 cdrom-detect Bug#259264: Install does not detect CDROM Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdrom-detect'. tags 259264 d-i Bug#259264: Install does not detect CDROM There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: cloning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 258984 -1 Bug#258984: Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken Bug 258984 cloned as bug 259892. reassign -1 kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386 Bug#259892: Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386'. retitle -1 r8169 network driver broken Bug#259892: Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken Changed Bug title. tags -1 d-i Bug#259892: r8169 network driver broken There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i clone 258984 -2 Bug#258984: Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken Bug 258984 cloned as bug 259893. reassign -2 kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386 Bug#259893: Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386'. retitle -2 r8169 network driver broken Bug#259893: Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken Changed Bug title. tags -2 d-i Bug#259893: r8169 network driver broken There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 258919 silo Bug#258919: ultra30 sid d-i daily failure Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `silo'. retitle 258919 silo works with 768MB fails with 256MB Bug#258919: ultra30 sid d-i daily failure Changed Bug title. tags 258919 d-i Bug#258919: silo works with 768MB fails with 256MB There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 258916 dhcp-client Bug#258916: sparc ultra-30 install success with sid daily Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `dhcp-client'. retitle 258916 dhcp fails first time during debian-installer Bug#258916: sparc ultra-30 install success with sid daily Changed Bug title. tags 258916 d-i Bug#258916: dhcp fails first time during debian-installer There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#258984: marked as done (Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 01:02:26 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2004 14:34:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 12 07:34:17 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from jadmin1.flyingj.com [204.110.224.42] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bk1sn-0005oJ-00; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:34:17 -0700 Received: from flyingj.com ([10.1.8.139]) by jadmin1.flyingj.com (Lotus Domino Release 6.0.2CF1) with ESMTP id 2004071208334005-9368 ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:33:40 -0600 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:32:45 -0600 From: Brett Dalla [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on jadmin1/Flyingj(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 07/12/2004 08:33:40 AM, Serialize by Router on jadmin1/Flyingj(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 07/12/2004 08:33:40 AM, Serialize complete at 07/12/2004 08:33:40 AM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Version: Sarge (testing) Beta 4 Debian-installer-version: Sarge Beta 4 (official 110Mb release) Date: 07-11-2004 Machine: Biostar IDEQ 200P Processor: AMD Athlon 64 Memory: 1 Gb Root Device: IDE HD0 Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked: [0] Configure network HW: [E] Config network: [0] Detect CD: [0] Load installer modules: [0] Detect hard drives: [0] Partition hard drives: [0] Create file systems: [0] Mount partitions: [0] Install base system: [0] Install boot loader: [0] Reboot: [0] Comments/Problems: The r8169 driver was loaded due to the Realtek RTL8110S GigE (onboard) NIC. The driver loads OK, but the network configuration fails to communicate over the network to configure with DHCP, and when hand-entered the continues to fail all communication over the network! I cannot download any packages to install beyond what is on the install CD. The apt-get portion of the installation fails. I downloaded the daily build (07/11/2004) of the Sarge installer, but it was no better than the official release -- the network still remains unavailable... I even retried the installers with the linux26 argument to try the 2.6 kernel, but no better results. I had an old version of the Sarge installer (dated 1-10-2004) that works. It installs the 2.4.23-1-386 kernel.The installation configures the network HW with the r8169 module and I can download packages from the Internet. There is a flaw when using ftp to move very large files, but I can seem to correct that if I set append=mem=1000M in my lilo.conf file. I have performed several installations of Sarge using various versions of the installer (on various platforms and configurations) over the past 7 months. I have been installing and using Debian for nearly 7 years and have been very happy, but this is the first time an installation has stumped me... I have read that the r8169 may be broken in several newsgroups. There appears to be debate on whether the flaw is in the driver or in the kernel headers... Is there any work being done on this to correct the r8169 problem? Brett Dalla [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 258984-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 06:02:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 16 23:02:30 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pico.surpasshosting.com [66.194.152.191] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BliHG-0005FO-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:02:30 -0700 Received: from cdm-208-180-235-136.cnro.cox-internet.com ([208.180.235.136] helo=calc-amd64) by pico.surpasshosting.com with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.34)
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 258908 partman Bug#258908: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac sid_d-i businesscard daily CD 2004/07/11 fails installing unstable Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'. tags 258908 d-i Bug#258908: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac sid_d-i businesscard daily CD 2004/07/11 fails installing unstable There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#258909: marked as done ()
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 01:19:32 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Debian Installer - ATI/Prism driver issues has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2004 05:40:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 22:40:54 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.nyct.net (bsd4.nyct.net) [216.139.141.2] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjtYc-0007GN-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:40:54 -0700 Received: from [192.168.2.8] (66-234-32-148.nyc.cable.nyct.net [66.234.32.148]) by bsd4.nyct.net (8.12.11/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i6C5er0x053343 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 01:40:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Subject: From: martin yazdzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 01:40:56 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 11/7/04 -sid_d-i mirror.kernel.org uname Linux mylaptopdeb 2.6.6-1-386 #1 Wed May 12 13:19:06 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 11/7/14:00 Method: How did you install? expert What did you boot off? cdrom If network install, from where? mirror.rcn.net Proxied? no Machine: Sager 5680 Processor:piv 2.8 ht Memory: 512 Root Device: toshiba hd Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hda: 60.0 GB, 60011642880 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 7296 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 13697296961217 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hda23698716527856710 83 Linux /dev/hda371667296 1052257+ 82 Linux swap Output of lspci and lspci -n: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 02) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P PCI to AGP Controller (rev 02) :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02) :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02) :00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #3 (rev 02) :00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02) :00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 02) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB/ER Hub interface to PCI Bridge (rev c2) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Bridge (rev 02) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) Ultra ATA 100 Storage Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) SMBus Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 02) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility Radeon 9600 M10] :03:00.0 CardBus bridge: ENE Technology Inc CB1410 Cardbus Controller :03:01.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB21 IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) :03:03.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) :03:04.0 Network controller: Intersil Corporation Intersil ISL3890 [Prism GT/Prism Duette] (rev 01) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 02) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P PCI to AGP Controller (rev 02) :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02) :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02) :00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #3 (rev 02) :00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02) :00:1d.7 USB
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 258834 partman Bug#258834: failed installation on Compaq Presario 1260 laptop Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'. retitle 258834 failed to create partitions Bug#258834: failed installation on Compaq Presario 1260 laptop Changed Bug title. tags 258834 d-i Bug#258834: failed to create partitions There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 258541 discover Bug#258541: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac netinst daily CD 2004/07/08 fails toinstall Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover'. retitle 258541 discover segfaults on powerpc Bug#258541: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac netinst daily CD 2004/07/08 fails toinstall Changed Bug title. tags 258541 d-i Bug#258541: discover segfaults on powerpc There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 258545 quik-installer Bug#258545: OldWorld PowerMac netinst daily CD 2004/07/08 success (mostly) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `quik-installer'. retitle 258545 failed to work on old-world mac Bug#258545: OldWorld PowerMac netinst daily CD 2004/07/08 success (mostly) Changed Bug title. tags 258545 d-i Bug#258545: failed to work on old-world mac There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merging, take THREE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 259876 wishlist Bug#259876: netcfg doesn't ask for manual settings Severity set to `wishlist'. merge 259876 237395 Bug#237395: netcfg: Please give choice of whether to try DHCP Bug#259876: netcfg doesn't ask for manual settings Bug#239431: netcfg: Please give choice of whether to try DHCP Bug#255211: netcfg: Please give choice of whether to try DHCP Merged 237395 239431 255211 259876. thanks for all the fish Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 258422 discover Bug#258422: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac netinst daily CD 2004/07/07 fails toinstall Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover'. retitle 258422 discover segfaults on powerpc Bug#258422: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac netinst daily CD 2004/07/07 fails toinstall Changed Bug title. tags 258422 d-i Bug#258422: discover segfaults on powerpc There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i merge 258422 248541 Bug number 248541 not found. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 258368 discover Bug#258368: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac netinst daily CD 2004/07/07 fails to install Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover'. retitle 258368 discover segfaults on powerpc Bug#258368: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac netinst daily CD 2004/07/07 fails to install Changed Bug title. tags 258368 d-i Bug#258368: discover segfaults on powerpc There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i merge 258368 258541 Bug#258368: discover segfaults on powerpc Bug#258541: discover segfaults on powerpc Merged 258368 258541. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259897: partman-ext3: unconsistent lowercase filesystem name
Package: partman-ext3 Version: cvs Severity: normal In the filesystem selection menu, other filesystem names begin with uppercase. But ext3 name begins with lowercase.. ReiserFS journalling file system JFS journalling file system XFS journalling file system ext3 journalling file system -- Changwoo Ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=EB=94=94=EC=A7=80?= =?UTF-8?Q?=ED=83=88?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=EC=84=9C=EB=AA=85?= =?UTF-8?Q?=EB=90=9C?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=EB=A9=94=EC=84=B8?= =?UTF-8?Q?=EC=A7=80?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=EB=B6=80=EB=B6=84=EC=9E=85=EB=8B=88?= =?UTF-8?Q?=EB=8B=A4?=
Processed: cloning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 258363 -1 Bug#258363: Package: installation-reports Bug 258363 cloned as bug 259899. reassign -1 grub-installer Bug#259899: Package: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'. retitle -1 uses hd2,0 instead of hd0,0 Bug#259899: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. tags -1 d-i Bug#259899: uses hd2,0 instead of hd0,0 There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i clone 258363 -2 Bug#258363: Package: installation-reports Bug 258363 cloned as bug 259900. reassign -2 mdcfg Bug#259900: Package: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `mdcfg'. retitle -2 mdcfg does not support raid5 Bug#259900: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. severity -2 wishlist Bug#259900: mdcfg does not support raid5 Severity set to `wishlist'. tags -2 d-i Bug#259900: mdcfg does not support raid5 There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i merge -2 253212 Bug#259900: mdcfg does not support raid5 Bug#253212: Can we have RAID5 support as well as RAID1 ? Merged 253212 259900. clone 258363 -3 Bug#258363: Package: installation-reports Bug 258363 cloned as bug 259901. reassign -3 kernel-image-2.6.6-2-386 Bug#259901: Package: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.6.6-2-386'. retitle -3 kernel does not like persistent superblocks Bug#259901: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. tags -3 d-i Bug#259901: kernel does not like persistent superblocks There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#257925: marked as done (INSTALL REPORT)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:27:49 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line INSTALL REPORT has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2004 18:15:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 06 11:15:13 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ns1.pinkzebra.net [80.239.139.114] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BhuTJ-0007g3-00; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 11:15:13 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (p50916144.dip.t-dialin.net [80.145.97.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.pinkzebra.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i66I7Mfj016247 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:07:22 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:15:09 +0200 From: Rainer Bendig, Digitally Impressed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Digitally Impressed User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: INSTALL REPORT X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Debian Installer Beta 3 debian.org/devel/debian-installer uname -a: Linux bendig-1 2.6.6-1-686 #1 Wed May 12 14:57:57 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: June, 29th 2004 01:40 PM GMT+1 Method: Network Install booted from Image and got it via http proxy from http://ftp.de.debian.org Machine: Wortmann Terra AURA 1700 (Notebook) Processor: Intel Pentium 4 @ 2.800 Mhz Memory: 1024 MB Root Device: /dev/hda1 Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40007761920 bytes 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 77520 cylinders Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes ~ Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 7556738085736+ 83 Linux /dev/hda2 76528 77520 500472f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hda3 75568 76527 483840 83 Linux /dev/hda5 76528 77520 500440+ 82 Linux swap Partition table entries are not in disk order proc/proc procdefaults0 0 /dev/hda3 /boot ext2defaults0 2 /dev/hda5 noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/hda1 / xfs defaults0 1 /dev/hdc/media/cdromiso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0 /dev/fd0/media/floppy autorw,user,noauto 0 0 /dev/hdc/cdrom iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0 Output of lspci and lspci -n: :00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS645DX Host Memory AGP Controller (rev 01) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] Virtual PCI-to-PCI bridge (AGP) :00:02.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS962 [MuTIOL Media IO] (rev 14) :00:02.1 SMBus: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]: Unknown device 0016 :00:02.3 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] FireWire Controller :00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] :00:02.6 Modem: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] AC'97 Modem Controller (rev a0) :00:02.7 Multimedia audio controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] Sound Controller (rev a0) :00:03.0 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 0f) :00:03.1 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 0f) :00:03.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 0f) :00:03.3 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 2.0 Controller :00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) :00:0c.0 CardBus bridge: ENE Technology Inc CB1410 Cardbus Controller :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 Lf [Radeon Mobility 9000 M9] (rev 01) :00:00.0 Class 0600: 1039:0646 (rev 01) :00:01.0 Class 0604: 1039:0001 :00:02.0 Class 0601: 1039:0962 (rev
Bug#258363: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:16:59 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Package: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 2004 04:11:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 08 21:11:42 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from node-402479a3.ewr.onnet.us.uu.net (mail.sashacompany.com) [64.36.121.163] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bimje-000847-00; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 21:11:42 -0700 Received: from eunos (node-402479a2.ewr.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.121.162]) by mail.sashacompany.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95CC9C6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 00:11:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Tory M. Skyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package: installation-reports Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 00:10:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_0054_01C46549.2331C9E0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcRlaqhklJB7V6o5RRyhWqAIyIsBrA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0054_01C46549.2331C9E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 07082004 uname -a: Linux Grundle 2.6.6-1-386 #1 Wed May 12 13:19:06 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 7-08-2004 22:00:00 Method: Network install from the download disk (link: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386- netinst.iso. I did a net install. No proxies. I booted from a cdrom drive (hda), from ftp-mirror.internap.org. Machine: Whitebox supermicro DBU MB onboard scsi disabled (flaky), offboard 29160, onboard ide for cdrom only, 2 offboard Silicon image ide raid cards. Processor: 2x pIII slot 1 550mhz Memory: 886 Root Device: scsi /dev/sda (scsi0:A:0): 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 127, 16bit) Vendor: FUJITSU Model: MAJ3091MP Rev: 0114 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 04 scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 8 Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/sda: 9137 MB, 9137912832 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1110 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 30 240943+ 83 Linux -- \boot /dev/sda2 31 212 1461915 83 Linux -- swap /dev/sda3 2131110 7213185 83 Linux -- \ Output of lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 03) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev 03) :00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02) :00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) :00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01) :00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02) :00:0e.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AHA-2940U2/U2W / 7890/7891 :00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3CR990-TX-95 [Typhoon 56-bit] (rev 02) :00:10.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7892A U160/m (rev 02) :00:12.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. (formerly CMD Technology Inc) PCI0680 Ultra ATA-133 Host Controller (rev 02) :00:14.0 IDE interface: Silicon Image, Inc. (formerly CMD Technology Inc) PCI0680 Ultra ATA-133 Host Controller (rev 01) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV5 [RIVA TNT2/TNT2 Pro] (rev 11) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[o ] Configure network HW: [o ] Config network: [o ] Detect CD: [o ] Load installer modules: [o ] Detect hard drives: [o ] Partition hard drives: [o ] Create file systems:[o ] Mount partitions: [o ] Install base system:[o ] Install boot loader:[e
Bug#257955: marked as done (installation-reports: Installation success)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:25:28 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line installation-reports: Installation success has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2004 21:18:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 06 14:18:18 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 212.130.112.10.nal-net.dk (webmail.nal-net.dk) [212.130.112.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BhxKT-0004Zy-00; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 14:18:18 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([10.3.52.53]) by webmail.nal-net.dk (NAL-NET MAIL v1.9) with ESMTP (SSL) id LRA74403 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:46:49 +0200 Received: from mojo by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BhwwV-FI-AF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 22:53:31 +0200 Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:53:30 +0200 From: Morten Bo Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation-reports: Installation success Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Morten Bo Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.62 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Sender: Morten Bo Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Although not reporting a bug, but rather the opposite, I hope I am doing the right thing by flagging this report 'normal'. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-386 Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=install-report.template Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/boot.img http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/root.img http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/cd-drivers.img http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040704/sarge-i386-netinst.iso They all had the time-stamp of July 4, 2004 uname -a: Linux gatsby 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i586 GNU/Linux Installation date: July 5, 2004 Method: Initially floppy-images: boot.img, root.img, cd-drivers.img and then from cdrom, sarge-i386-netinst.iso How did you install? See above; boot floppies and then netinst.iso with a DHCP configured Internet connection to mirror http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/. No proxy. Machine: 8-year old no-name warehouse computer, with some changed peripherals Processor: P133 Memory: 80 MB Root Device: SCSI, /dev/sda2 Root Size/partition table: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 4335 MB, 4335206400 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 527 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 26 208813+ 6 FAT16 /dev/sda2 27 502 3823470 83 Linux /dev/sda3 503 527 200812+ 5 Extended /dev/sda5 503 527 200781 82 Linux swap Output of lspci and lspci -n: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430VX - 82437VX TVX [Triton VX] (rev 01) :00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] (rev 01) :00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II] :00:12.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7861 (rev 01) :00:13.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc RTL8139 Ethernet (rev 10) :00:14.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. ViRGE/DX or /GX (rev 01) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo lspci -n :00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:7030 (rev 01) :00:07.0 Class 0601: 8086:7000 (rev 01) :00:07.1 Class 0101: 8086:7010 :00:12.0 Class 0100:
Processed: cloning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 257869 -1 Bug#257869: sarge, alpha Bug 257869 cloned as bug 259904. reassign -1 netcfg Bug#259904: sarge, alpha Warning: Unknown package 'sarge' Bug reassigned from package `sarge, installation-reports' to `netcfg'. retitle -1 rp-pppoe support needed Bug#259904: sarge, alpha Changed Bug title. tags -1 d-i Bug#259904: rp-pppoe support needed There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i clone 257869 -2 Bug#257869: sarge, alpha Bug 257869 cloned as bug 259905. reassign -2 partman Bug#259905: sarge, alpha Warning: Unknown package 'sarge' Bug reassigned from package `sarge, installation-reports' to `partman'. retitle -2 alpha - boot partition creation didn't work Bug#259905: sarge, alpha Changed Bug title. tags -2 d-i Bug#259905: alpha - boot partition creation didn't work There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259903: installation reports
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/powerpc/20040716/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux ayu 2.4.25-powerpc #1 mer avr 14 15:38:38 CEST 2004 ppc GNU/Linux Date: 2004-07-16 Method: I used that cdrom image. Machine: iBook G4 12 800MHz Processor: PowerPC G4 (3.3) Memory: 256 MB Root Device: IDE Root Size/partition table: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda5 3952568416520 3335268 12% / tmpfs 127000 0127000 0% /dev/shm Output of lspci: :00:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 AGP :00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV250 5c63 [Radeon Mobility 9200 M9+] (rev 01) :10:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 PCI :10:12.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM94306 802.11g (rev 03) :10:17.0 Class ff00: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid Mac I/O :10:18.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid USB :10:19.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid USB :10:1a.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid USB :10:1b.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43) :10:1b.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43) :10:1b.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 04) :20:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 Internal PCI :20:0d.0 Class ff00: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth/Intrepid ATA/100 :20:0e.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 FireWire (rev 81) :20:0f.0 Ethernet controller: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 GMAC (Sun GEM) (rev 80) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[E] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Initial boot with argument install didn't work. I used install-safe and I could go on. Any other things were successful. I have some troubles with configuring X11, but that's not the installation problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: cloning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 257759 -1 Bug#257759: Debian-installer - mixed results Dell Inspiron 8100 Laptop Bug 257759 cloned as bug 259909. reassign -1 kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386 Bug#259909: Debian-installer - mixed results Dell Inspiron 8100 Laptop Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386'. retitle -1 hangs on dell inspiron 8100 pcmcia Bug#259909: Debian-installer - mixed results Dell Inspiron 8100 Laptop Changed Bug title. tags -1 d-i Bug#259909: hangs on dell inspiron 8100 pcmcia There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i clone 257759 -2 Bug#257759: Debian-installer - mixed results Dell Inspiron 8100 Laptop Bug 257759 cloned as bug 259910. reassign -2 kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386 Bug#259910: Debian-installer - mixed results Dell Inspiron 8100 Laptop Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386'. retitle -2 hangs on dell inspiron 8100 pcmcia Bug#259910: Debian-installer - mixed results Dell Inspiron 8100 Laptop Changed Bug title. tags -2 d-i Bug#259910: hangs on dell inspiron 8100 pcmcia There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#257759: marked as done (Debian-installer - mixed results Dell Inspiron 8100 Laptop)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:57:12 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Debian-installer - mixed results Dell Inspiron 8100 Laptop has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 21:22:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 05 14:22:30 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 82-41-51-227.cable.ubr07.edin.blueyonder.co.uk (lappy) [82.41.51.227] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bhav0-0007s6-00; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:22:30 -0700 Received: from skx by lappy with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bhaut-00048n-Op for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:22:23 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 22:22:23 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Debian-installer - mixed results Dell Inspiron 8100 Laptop Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Sender: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Debian-installer beta 4 http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ uname -a: Linux lappy 2.4.26-1-686 #1 Sat May 1 18:04:05 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: Sun Jul 4th 2004 Method: I downloaded the 110Mb CD Image, with Debian base from the debian-installer page, and booted from that. The installation was then continued over the network, after an upgrade to `unstable` once the base was setup to my satisfaction. Machine: Dell Inspiron 8100 Laptop Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU 1200MHz Memory:512Mb Root Device: 40Gb IDE Laptop drive Root Size/partition table: Feel free to paste the full partition table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where. - Disk Drive: /dev/hda Size: 40007761920 bytes, 40.0 GB Heads: 255 Sectors per Track: 63 Cylinders: 4864 /hda1 Boot ext3 20999.14 hda2 Linux swap 1003.49 /homehda3 Linux ext3 18005.14 Output of lspci --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82815 815 Chipset Host Bridge and Memory C ontroller Hub (rev 04) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82815 815 Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 04) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge (rev 03) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 03) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801BAM IDE U100 (rev 03) :00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 03) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 Go] (r ev b2) :02:03.0 Multimedia audio controller: ESS Technology ES1983S Maestro-3i PCI Audio Accelerator (rev 10) :02:06.0 PCI bridge: Actiontec Electronics Inc Mini-PCI bridge (rev 11) :02:0f.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI4451 PC card Cardbus Controlle r :02:0f.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI4451 PC card Cardbus Controlle r :02:0f.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments PCI4451 IEEE-1394 Controlle r :08:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) :08:08.0 Communication controller: Lucent Microelectronics WinModem 56k (rev 01) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82815 815 Chipset Host Bridge and Memory Controller Hub (rev 04) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82815 815 Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 04) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge (rev 03) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 03) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801BAM IDE U100 (rev 03) :00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 03) :01:00.0 VGA
Bug#257771: marked as done (i386 netboot: 2.4 garbled, 2.6 broken)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:50:46 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line i386 netboot: 2.4 garbled, 2.6 broken has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 22:54:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 05 15:54:52 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.19] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BhcMN-0007yp-00; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 15:54:52 -0700 Received: from fwd00.aul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BhcMM-0002Qe-01; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:54:50 +0200 Received: from alfred.kasoft.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fwd00.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BhcMD-0F7Piy0; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 00:54:41 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Kaminski) To: Debian BTS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:56:33 +0200 Reply-To: Herbert Kaminski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Standard (2.20.2380) For Windows 98 (4.10.) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: i386 netboot: 2.4 garbled, 2.6 broken Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Seen: false X-ID: EAEPioZpZe8NJIbQyGf684I5aS0MKcSd5TnvSdrRd4aRIcx6MofiYY Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: netboot from http://p.d.o/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot and http://p.d.o/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/2.6 downloaded 05-JUL-2004 at 22:00 UTC uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt Date: 05-JUL-2004 Method: netboot, then selecting 'testing' network connection through local HTTP proxy to ftp.de.debian.org Machine: plain vanilla i386 from parts Processor: AMD K6-2 500MHz Memory: 96MB Root Device: 40GB IDE /dev/hdb1 Root Size/partition table: 39GB ext3 on hdb1, 512 MB swap on hdb5 Output of lspci: Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O/E] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: 1. With both images, the starting screen was garbled: lots (but not all) of non-ASCII characters were displayed as little black blocks (see http://www.medvillage.de/debian/ ) 2. The 2.6 version (with kernel 2.6.7-1-386) did not detect my hard disks, so installation stopped there Herbert --- Received: (at 257771-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 07:50:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 00:50:49 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pico.surpasshosting.com [66.194.152.191] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bljy5-0003wo-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:50:49 -0700 Received: from cdm-208-180-235-136.cnro.cox-internet.com ([208.180.235.136] helo=calc-amd64) by pico.surpasshosting.com with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bljy4-0006Or-NC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 03:50:48 -0400 Received: from ccheney by calc-amd64 with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bljy2-0007wY-2D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:50:46 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:50:46 -0500 From: Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: i386 netboot: 2.4 garbled, 2.6 broken Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Pzq24Sl94SYEqopo Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Sender: Christopher L Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - pico.surpasshosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - cheney.cx X-Source: X-Source-Args:
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 257591 kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386 Bug#257591: (no subject) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386'. retitle 257591 multiple cpqarrays do not work correctly with devfs Bug#257591: (no subject) Changed Bug title. tags 257591 d-i Bug#257591: multiple cpqarrays do not work correctly with devfs There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: cloning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 257432 -1 Bug#257432: Compaq Presario 1220 locks up after booting from CD-ROM (daily 2004-07-02, i386, 2.4 and 2.6 kernels) Bug 257432 cloned as bug 259911. reassign -1 kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386 Bug#259911: Compaq Presario 1220 locks up after booting from CD-ROM (daily 2004-07-02, i386, 2.4 and 2.6 kernels) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386'. retitle -1 compaq presario 1220 fails to boot Bug#259911: Compaq Presario 1220 locks up after booting from CD-ROM (daily 2004-07-02, i386, 2.4 and 2.6 kernels) Changed Bug title. tags -1 d-i Bug#259911: compaq presario 1220 fails to boot There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i clone 247432 -2 Bug number 247432 not found. reassign -2 kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386 Bug number -2 not found. retitle -2 compaq presario 1220 fails to boot Bug number -2 not found. tags -2 d-i Bug number -2 not found. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassigning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 257411 base-installer Bug#257411: =?iso-8859-1?q?=EE386_daily_build:_sarge_di_OK,_sid_di_fails:_wrong_kernel?= Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'. retitle 257411 installs wrong kernel for K6-2 CPU Bug#257411: =?iso-8859-1?q?=EE386_daily_build:_sarge_di_OK,_sid_di_fails:_wrong_kernel?= Changed Bug title. tags 257411 d-i Bug#257411: installs wrong kernel for K6-2 CPU There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#257432: marked as done (Compaq Presario 1220 locks up after booting from CD-ROM (daily 2004-07-02, i386, 2.4 and 2.6 kernels))
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 03:08:46 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Compaq Presario 1220 locks up after booting from CD-ROM (daily 2004-07-02, i386, 2.4 and 2.6 kernels) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2004 13:09:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 03 06:09:25 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpin.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.18] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BgkGj-7i-00; Sat, 03 Jul 2004 06:09:25 -0700 Received: from hfx.eastlink.ca ([24.138.78.155]) by mx4.eastlink.ca (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTPA id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 03 Jul 2004 10:00:12 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 10:01:08 -0300 From: Robin Blondon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Compaq Presario 1220 locks up after booting from CD-ROM (daily 2004-07-02, i386, 2.4 and 2.6 kernels) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_40,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Sarge Daily 110 MB CD image for i386 from July 2, 2004 from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/ uname -a: Date: July 3, 2004 Method: Boot from CD-ROM Machine: Compaq Presario 1220 laptop Processor: Cyrix MediaGX 200MHz Memory: 80MB Root Device: IDE, FUJITSU MHA2021AT Root Size/partition table: Output of lspci: (from a running beta4 installation) :00:00.0 Host bridge: Cyrix Corporation PCI Master :00:12.0 ISA bridge: Cyrix Corporation 5520 [Cognac] :00:14.0 VGA compatible controller: Neomagic Corporation NM2093 [MagicGraph 128ZV+] (rev 01) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[E] Configure network HW: [ ] Config network: [ ] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: When trying to install using either the 2.4 or the 2.6 kernel, the laptop locks up shortly after booting from the CD-ROM. The laptop is unresponsive and must be turned off. This particular problem did not happen with beta4 (although there were other problems with respect to ide-cd under 2.6 and my wireless LAN PCMCIA card). The last few boot message lines for the 2.4 kernel are: VFS: mounted root (ext2 filesystem). Trying to move old root to /initrd ... okay Mounted devfs on /dev Freeing unused kernel memory: 92k freed Setting up filesystem, please wait ... NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4. The last few boot message lines for the 2.6 kernel are: VFS: mounted root (ext2 filesystem). Trying to move old root to /initrd ... okay Mounted devfs on /dev Freeing unused kernel memory: 200k freed Setting up filesystem, please wait ... NET: Registered protocol family 1 I also tried adding the boot parameters noapic nolapic debian-installer/framebuffer=false for both kernels and I got the same results. --- Received: (at 257432-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 08:08:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 01:08:50 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pico.surpasshosting.com [66.194.152.191] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BlkFW-0004sh-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 01:08:50 -0700 Received: from cdm-208-180-235-136.cnro.cox-internet.com ([208.180.235.136] helo=calc-amd64) by pico.surpasshosting.com with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1BlkFV-0008H8-G2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 04:08:49 -0400 Received: from ccheney by calc-amd64 with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BlkFS-00086r-Qr for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 03:08:46 -0500
Processed: NO Detect CD with sarge-sparc-netinst.iso on SUN Ultra60
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 257260 -1 Bug#257260: NO Detect CD with sarge-sparc-netinst.iso on SUN Ultra60 Bug 257260 cloned as bug 259913. reassign -1 kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc64-di Bug#259913: NO Detect CD with sarge-sparc-netinst.iso on SUN Ultra60 Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc64-di'. retitle -1 sr_mod does not work with Ultra60 cdrom Bug#259913: NO Detect CD with sarge-sparc-netinst.iso on SUN Ultra60 Changed Bug title. tags -1 d-i Bug#259913: sr_mod does not work with Ultra60 cdrom There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i clone 257260 -2 Bug#257260: NO Detect CD with sarge-sparc-netinst.iso on SUN Ultra60 Bug 257260 cloned as bug 259914. reassign -2 partman Bug#259914: NO Detect CD with sarge-sparc-netinst.iso on SUN Ultra60 Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'. retitle -2 sparc - Fujitsu MAP3367NC should be predefined in list Bug#259914: NO Detect CD with sarge-sparc-netinst.iso on SUN Ultra60 Changed Bug title. tags -2 d-i Bug#259914: sparc - Fujitsu MAP3367NC should be predefined in list There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
processing installation reports
I noticed that Joey Hess had stated d-i needed some help with processing installation reports so I started working on them tonight. Hopefully I didn't screw up too badly, I processed 32 reports tonight. If anyone noticed things I did wrong please let me know so that I can be less of a nuisance in the future. BTW - d-i still has around 436 reports yet to be processed. Thanks, Chris Cheney signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#257260: marked as done (NO Detect CD with sarge-sparc-netinst.iso on SUN Ultra60)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 03:25:27 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line NO Detect CD with sarge-sparc-netinst.iso on SUN Ultra60 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jul 2004 09:30:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 02 02:30:19 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp15.wxs.nl [195.121.6.54] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BgKN9-0006Gt-00; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:30:19 -0700 Received: from kelf.nl.eu.org (ip9135dd4b.speed.planet.nl [145.53.221.75]) by smtp15.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:29:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 8179 invoked from network); Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:29:46 + Received: from speedtouch.kelfdomain (HELO secure.kelf.nl.eu.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by speedtouch.kelfdomain with SMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:29:46 + Received: from 10.0.0.161 (SquirrelMail authenticated user marco) ; by secure.kelf.nl.eu.org with HTTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:29:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:29:46 +0200 (CEST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NO Detect CD with sarge-sparc-netinst.iso on SUN Ultra60 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: sarge-sparc-netinst.iso 30-Jun-2004 22:31 83.5M http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/current/ uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt Date: 01-Jul-2004 Method: CD-Rom; X6161A [S] 370-2816 [F] SunCD 12 Listed in: http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/Systems/U60/components.html Machine: SUN Ultra 60, dual CPU 450 mhz IEEE Boot Prom 3.29.0 2000/12/20 SUN4U Processor: 2x450mhz Memory: 1269176k Root Device: SCSI Name of device: Fujitsu MAP3367NC Root Size/partition table: 36,7Gb Feel free to paste the full partition table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where. Output of lspci: Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [E] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments and ideas you had during the initial install. [?] Detect and mount cdrom Error while running modprobe -v sr_mod The cdrom player is in the compatible components list for the Ultra60 (http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/Systems/U60/components.html) The cdrom player is detected by Woody install cd. Thoughts: The harddisk Fujitsu MAP3367NC is also in the compatible components list for the Ultra60. Is it possible to have this disk predefined in the fdisk partitioner? Some older Ultra60 compatible disks are predefined and selectable in de fdisk partitioning dialog. It would be nice to have the Fujitsu MAP3367NC (and others from the components list) added. In the Woody fdisk dialog i was forced to answer all kinds of obscure questions about sectors/track, interleave facter etc.. Although i have the documentation on the drive..i was unsure about a number of answers. Has any work been done on the sound-card (Audio Module 501-4155) of this Ultra60? Apart from wanting to install the 2.6 kernel having sound would be a bonus. Thanks for the Sparc port :-) Regards, Marco Calf --- Received: (at 257260-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 08:25:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 01:25:53 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pico.surpasshosting.com [66.194.152.191] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id
Bug#259922: Swap partition marked as Linux
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Debian Sarge Official NetInst Snapshot 20040429 uname -a: Linux epidauro 2.6.3-1-386 #2 Tue Feb 24 20:20:23 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: Tue Jul 13 23:42:27 CEST 2004 Method: Boot linux26, install from network, http italian mirror without proxy. Machine: VIA P4XB Motherboard, HD Maxtor 6E040L0 ATA DISK 40 Gb Processor: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz Memory: 256 Mb Root Device: /dev/hda Disk /dev/hda: 41.1 GB, 41110142976 bytes 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 79656 cylinders Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 13875 1952968+ 83 Linux /dev/hda23876 7965638193624f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hda538764371 249952+ 83 Linux /dev/hda643725340 488344+ 83 Linux /dev/hda7 78688 79656 488344+ 83 Linux /dev/hda85341 7868736966856+ 83 Linux Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 1830261314637 1417976 19% / tmpfs 128464 0128464 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda6 457656 67685365554 16% /var /dev/hda8 36385948 81856 34455752 1% /home Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [E] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: The swap partition (hda5) was made correctly, stated correctly in fstab and used as swap, but the type was left as Linux instead of Linux swap. -- Niccolo Rigacci Firenze - Italy War against Iraq? Not in my name! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: d-i dated 2004 07 13 failled to boot on a sparc sunblade 100
Fredreik, Frederik Dannemare wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joel, On Thursday 15 July 2004 13:57, Joel Soete wrote: Hello Frederik, [ snip ] RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0[*] Freeing initrd memory: 1814k freed VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). Mounted devfs on /dev VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). Trying to move old root to /initrd ... okay Mounted devfs on /dev Setting up filesUnimplemented SPARC system call 188 ystem, please waUnimplemented SPARC system call 188 it ... Unimplemented SPARC system call 188 Unimplemented SPARC system call 188 Unimplemented SPARC system call 188 Unimplemented SPARC system call 188 Starting system log daemon: syslogd, klogd. insmod: usb-ohci.o: no module by that name found modprobe: failed to load module usb-ohci insmod: usbkbd.o: no module by that name found modprobe: failed to load module usbkbd insmod: keybdev.o: no module by that name found modprobe: failed to load module keybdev insmod: usbserial.o: no module by that name found modprobe: failed to load module usbserial OTC when I go back to gfx console (the linux penguin appears well in the uper left screen corner :-) ) all seems the same excepted that at [*] it failled like you mentioned in your bug report: [...] RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0. Freeing initrd memory: 1820k freed Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00 Press L1-A to return to the boot prom [ snip ] If I have understood you correctly, the problem doesn't occur when using a serial console, but does occur when you don't. If so, this sounds a bit odd to me. Maybe you should open a bug report about this behavior. You have perfectly undurstood. Allright I will open a br. Thanks for your attention and advise, Joel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#239464: debian-installer [businesscard] wrong kernel
In regards to bug #239464 I ran into a similar situation: Debain-installer businesscard .iso daily snapshot from July 14 2004 or thereabouts: It repeatedly installed a -k7 kernel on a dual processor Intel Pentium II system, leading to a reboot soon after GRUB passed things on. I had the same problem on an Intel P4 system I tried the beta2(?) installer on some time ago. In that case the beta3 installer fixed the problem, but I think for the wrong reasons: I'm pretty sure that in the old case, as well as today it failed because I chose stable as the distro to track. Selecting testing makes it install a good -686 kernel. I guess that's how I fixed it by mistake last time. I'll change the sources.conf to track sarge instead of testing, and then when things become stable I'll be all set. I suppose when Sarge is released this may not be an issue as stable becomes what's on the CD?? or not. (It also gave me a 2.4-k7 kernel when I ran linux26 - stable) regards, Hamish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting installer on RS/6000 43p-140
[talk about Motorola Powerstack II Pro4000] JW Mmmh, i did try netboot. But kernel gets stuck to Now booting kernel JW too... Yes, recent 2.6 kernels are known to not boot on this specific PReP machine. It's a known problem but nothing has been done - I myself haven't had enough time to dig into kernel debuggers to look at it deeper. -- Meelis Roos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259942: d-i dated 2004 07 13 failled to boot on a sparc sunblade 100
Package: debian-installer Debian-installer-version: 2004 07 13 from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/ Machine: SunBlade 100 Hi all, I am not very familiar with d-i and less with sparc arch but a colleage of mine ask me to test a linux its sunblade :) After the download of the woody the install start to failled becasue of the know problem: ?Fast access MMU Miss. I so try to download the sarges-netinstall.iso beta4 (May 2004) for this platform but after ENTER to install the kernel (a 2.4.24 if a read well) failled to boot because: [...] panic: no init found Finaly I download the last sarges-netinstall.iso dated of this 2004 07 13 where the kernel (the 2.4.26) panic also because: [...] RAMDISK:Couldn't find valid RAM Disk image starting at 0. ... Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs. On the m-l, 'Frederik Dannemare' advise also me to test: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040713/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso which failled to boot the same way. The weird stuff came when I tried to boot with a serial console to collect dmesg, I couldn't anymore reproduce the pb? Here is what I grab: Initializing Memory... ok boot cdrom Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:f File and args: SILO Version 1.4.6 \ Welcome to Debian GNU/Linux sarge! This is a Debian installation CDROM, built on 20040713. Keep it once you have installed your system, as you can boot from it to repair the system on your hard disk if that ever becomes necessary. WARNING: You should completely back up all of your hard disks before proceeding. The installation procedure can completely and irreversibly erase them! If you haven't made backups yet, remove the rescue CD from the drive and press L1-A to get back to the OpenBoot prompt. Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by applicable law. [ ENTER - Boot install ] [ Type rescue - Boot into rescue mode ] boot: Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel |/-\[...]|/Loaded kernel version 2.4.26 Loading initial ramdisk (1858437 bytes at 0x780 phys, 0x40C0 virt)... -\|/[...]-\|/ Remapping the kernel... done. Booting Linux... PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 4.0.45 2001/02/08 14:33 Linux version 2.4.26-sparc64 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.3 (Debian 20040321)) #1 Fri Jun 18 02:04:50 PDT 2004 ARCH: SUN4U Ethernet address: 00:03:ba:10:e5:74 On node 0 totalpages: 15502 zone(0): 16270 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Found CPU 0 (node=f006dbd4,mid=0) Found 1 CPU prom device tree node(s). Kernel command line: root=/dev/rd/0 cdrom devfs=mount rw ramdisk_size=8192 rootfstype=ext2 Calibrating delay loop... 1002.70 BogoMIPS Memory: 122440k available (2592k kernel code, 608k data, 184k init) [f800,07f1c000] Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 262144 bytes) Inode cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 131072 bytes) Mount cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 8192 bytes) Buffer cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 8192 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 131072 bytes) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX PCI: Probing for controllers. PCI: Found SABRE, main regs at 01fe, wsync at 01fe1c20 SABRE: Shared PCI config space at 01fe0100 SABRE: DVMA at c000 [2000] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 8] map[0] to INO[23] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ c] map[0] to INO[06] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ c] map[0] to INO[1c] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ c] map[0] to INO[24] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ d] map[0] to INO[0c] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[13] map[0] to INO[0f] PCI0(PBMA): Bus running at 33MHz isa0: [dma - (floppy) (parallel)] [power] [serial] [serial] ebus0: [flashprom] [eeprom] [idprom] PCIO serial driver version 1.54 su(serial) at 0x1fe020003f8 (tty 0 irq 12,7eb) is a 16550A su(serial) at 0x1fe020002e8 (tty 1 irq 12,7eb) is a 16550A Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Initializing RT netlink socket Starting kswapd VFS: Disk quotas vdquot_6.5.1 Journalled Block Device driver loaded devfs: v1.12c (20020818) Richard Gooch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) devfs: boot_options: 0x1 pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured rtc_init: no PC rtc found RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 8192K size 1024 blocksize loop: loaded (max 8 devices) sungem.c:v0.97 3/20/02 David S. Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) eth%d: MII PHY ID: 437420 Enable Semiconductor eth0: Sun GEM (PCI) 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:03:ba:10:e5:74 Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00beta4-2.4 ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx ALI15X3: IDE controller at PCI slot 00:0d.0 ALI15X3: chipset revision 195 ALI15X3: 100% native mode on irq 4,7cc ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1fe02000a20-0x1fe02000a27, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio ide1: BM-DMA at 0x1fe02000a28-0x1fe02000a2f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio hda:
Re: ppc64 kernel package
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 08:42:24PM -0300, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote: I was able to compile a 64 kernel debian package. The steps: 1)apply the attached patches to dpkg and kernel-package, compile and install 2)install a cross-compiler (use http://kegel.com/crosstool/) Well, if this could be modified so we could have a cross compiler in debian, it would be nice. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#258981: network-console: partman does not show partitions
Frans Pop : On Tuesday 13 July 2004 12:37, Bastian Blank wrote: This may be a charset problem. Try to use an UTF8 capable terminal. I tried the following: - konsole with 'unicode font' selected = partitions not shown - xterm = partitions not shown - uxterm = partitions not shown - vt1 = partitions are shown, but borders, scrollbar and non-ascii chars are not shown correctly It does seem to have to do with non-ascii chars. If I select Greek as language, almost the whole main menu disappears on the remote console :-( If I choose Chech, lines are cut off at the first non-ascii character. (My remark on IRC was incorrect: the language on the remote is identical to the one selected on the laptop.) Any other ideas? Configuration changes or packages I could install on my Woody box to get UTF8 support? Try to use following command line to connect to d-i: TERM=linux ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] It should be executed terminal that work in UTF-8 mode, like LANG=ll_CC.UTF-8 konsole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another pcmcia-cs (with DMI support etc.)
Matthew Garrett wrote: IBM tend to put the 7-character model id in Product Name, with the (more useful) model name under Version - for example: DMI type 1, 25 bytes. System Information Manufacturer: IBM Product Name: 237167G Version: ThinkPad X40 OK, I'll modify the script to include Version in $compid if it is not set to Not Specified or Not Available. The older Thinkpad I have (a 240X) has: DMI type 1, 25 bytes. System Information Manufacturer: IBM Product Name: 260962G Version: Not Available The first 4 digits of the product name are model specific, with the next 2 identifying the hardware spec as shipped. However, more recent models are a little more difficult. Both 2369 and 2371 are ThinkPad X40s. I see. If this applies to any of the models needing special resource options, there's not much I can do at the moment, but I'll try to do some research on the web when I get home. (Please CC me on replies.) -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another pcmcia-cs (with DMI support etc.)
Sorry, I forgot to tell you to CC me on replies (although I did set the non-standard Mail-Followup-To header). Joey Hess wrote: Changing debootstrap is basically changing the packages in base and can lead to a fair amount of pain and we're trying not to do it at this point. So it may be better to use apt-install or something. OK. It would really be best at this point if things don't break if dmidecode is not installed. Once the support is in the archive, we can add it to the netinst CD. Yes, that's what it does. It uses dmidecode if available, but doesn't break if it's not. (Please CC me on replies.) -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m68k install daily build broken ?
Hi, i tried to install on a Qudra 840av and basically it doesnt work how i try it. There is a complete lack of documentation on how to unstuff the .sit files - The documentations merely mentions the existance of penguin. Though in the install/mac folder there are 2 penguin versions (18 and 19) and at least 4 initrds. Additionally there are root and root22 in the parent directory but no documentation on when to use what. With the beta4 at least the kernel comes up for me, throwing an error on mounting the rootfs. With the daily snapshots the kernel does not show any signs of life. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134 Heisenberg may have been here. pgpO8J7JYTfJC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: m68k install daily build broken ?
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: Hi, i tried to install on a Qudra 840av and basically it doesnt work how i try it. There is a complete lack of documentation on how to unstuff the .sit files - The documentations merely mentions the existance of penguin. Though in the install/mac folder there are 2 penguin versions (18 and 19) and at least 4 initrds. Additionally there are root and root22 in the parent directory but no documentation on when to use what. With the beta4 at least the kernel comes up for me, throwing an error on mounting the rootfs. With the daily snapshots the kernel does not show any signs of life. Ok - got a step further - Basically the problem seems to be when you turn on too much debugging in penguin it basically runs the kernel but the screen stays dark except the cursor. Now i have ran penguin with linux-mac-2.2.5 with the initrd-linuxmedia.gz. Bugs are in chronologic order - EXT3-fs error - Wrong free blocks / bitmap .. after mount of ramdisk - umount /initrd/dev no such file or directory - umount /initrd invalid argument - languagechooser shows chars not displayable (utf8) - hang in archdetect - Last line in logfile on tty4 DEBUG: configure archdetect, status: 2 Nothing for 20 minutes - reboot Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134 Heisenberg may have been here. pgpyZFDM31TSl.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#246271: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:23:51 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2004 06:25:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 27 23:25:45 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.kamp-dsl.de (dsl-mail.kamp.net) [195.62.99.42] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BIiVt-0006b9-00; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:25:45 -0700 Received: (qmail 30337 invoked by uid 513); 28 Apr 2004 06:25:45 - Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (clamdscan: devel-20040409. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:1(213.146.116.40):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 0.715908 secs); 28 Apr 2004 06:25:45 - Received: from unknown (HELO gretchen.bullfinch.org) (213.146.116.40) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 28 Apr 2004 06:25:44 - Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gretchen.bullfinch.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1D31E0043 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:25:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gretchen.bullfinch.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gretchen [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25791-02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:25:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from faust (faust.bullfinch.org [192.168.0.102]) by gretchen.bullfinch.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC69E1E0042 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:25:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Heiner Markert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package: installation-reports Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:25:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at bullfinch.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-businesscard.iso (27.04.2004)uname -a: unknownDate: 27.04.2004 21:00Method: Booted from CD for a network install via a http proxy.Machine: Asrock K7S8X (SIS chipset), NVidia FX5200 graphics, SB PCI128 soundProcessor: Athlon XP Memory: 512MB Root Device: IDE hard diskRoot Size/partition table: unable to do partitioningOutput of lspci: unknown Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [E] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [E] Partition hard drives: [E] Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Booting with the linux image was possible. During hardware detection, the system assigned ide-disk driver, which is perfectly ok, but after loading that driver, lots of hda: interrupt lost messages appeared in the logs and the system became very unresponsive.Using the linux26 image instead, booting was ok, also hard drive detection, but the installer was unable to detect my ide cdrom drives. Trying on the console, I noticed that the kernel module ide-cd was not loaded, I manually added it, but when switching back to the installers console (Alt+F1), there only appeared vertical lines on the screen and no correct image, so proceeding with the installation was not possible.Switching between consoles worked with the 2.4 image.Alltogether, I was not able to get the system installed using the installer, expert images didn't help either. --- Received: (at 246271-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 16:23:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 09:23:41 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BlryP-0001v8-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:23:41 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown
Processed: retitle V
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unmerge 244776 Bug#244776: VIA Rhine NIC support missing in Installer beta 3 Bug#244775: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] VIA Rhine NIC support missing (no followup by submitter) Disconnected #244776 from all other report(s). # duplicate close 244776 Bug#244776: VIA Rhine NIC support missing in Installer beta 3 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Robert Lowry, Debian GNU/Linux User [EMAIL PROTECTED] unmerge 244668 Bug#244668: Package: installation-reports Bug#244665: [i386] [20040418] [netinst] 8139too not loaded after reboot Disconnected #244668 from all other report(s). # duplicate close 244668 Bug#244668: Package: installation-reports 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Matthew Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 245515 [i386] [20040423] [netinst] Realtech Problem Bug#245515: Netinst Realtech Problem Changed Bug title. tag 245515 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#245515: [i386] [20040423] [netinst] Realtech Problem There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible retitle 245827 [powerpc] [20040422] [netinst] G5 install freezes Bug#245827: G5 Install Changed Bug title. retitle 246066 [sparc] [beta3] [miniiso] sparcstation LX partial success Bug#246066: beta 3 install report sparcstation LX -- success Changed Bug title. tag 246066 moreinfo Bug#246066: [sparc] [beta3] [miniiso] sparcstation LX partial success There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo retitle 246220 [sparc] [20040424] [netinst] lowmem sparc32 install; partitioner failed to start Bug#246220: lo-mem installation on sparc32 Changed Bug title. retitle 246271 [i386] [20040424] [businesscard] failure Bug#246271: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) retitle 246327 [i386] [20040427] [netinst] success with comments Bug#246327: installation-reports Changed Bug title. retitle 246357 [i386] [20040427] [netinst] newbie installation report Bug#246357: newbie installation report Changed Bug title. retitle 246492 [sparc] [20040427] [netinst] broken busybox modprobe Bug#246492: sparc netinst daily build broken -- broken busybox modprobe Changed Bug title. retitle 246770 [powerpc] [beta3] [CD] powermac 7200 install - not entirely easy Bug#246770: PowerMac 7200 install report - not entirely easy Changed Bug title. retitle 246820 [sparc] [beta4] [netinst] fails to boot Bug#246820: Sarge Beta 4 sparc report Changed Bug title. retitle 246823 [arm] [beta4] [netboot] boot failure Bug#246823: beta4 arm-netwinder fails Changed Bug title. retitle 246824 [i386] [beta4] [netinst] exim install failure under vmware 4.0; 2.6 kernel incompatability Bug#246824: installation-reports d-i beta4 Changed Bug title. retitle 246834 [i386] [beta4] [netinst] success, no highmem, poweroff failure Bug#246834: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. retitle 246877 [m68k] [20040429] [nativehd] amiga: success Bug#246877: successfull installation on m68k/amiga Changed Bug title. retitle 246889 [i386] [beta4] [netboot] qualified success Bug#246889: d-i beta4 installation report Changed Bug title. retitle 246959 [sparc] [beta4] [businesscard] boot failure with sparc60 Bug#246959: d-i beta4 boot problem with sun sparc60 Changed Bug title. retitle 246999 [i386] [20040501] [netboot] 2.6 eepro100 not autodetected Bug#246999: Beta4 i386 netboot install (kernel 2.6) Changed Bug title. retitle 247006 [i386] [beta4] [netboot] hang during extra packages install Bug#247006: Sarge Installer hangs Changed Bug title. tag 247006 moreinfo Bug#247006: [i386] [beta4] [netboot] hang during extra packages install There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo retitle 247036 [i386] [beta4] [netinst] Can't make multiple partitions bootable; Windows XP undetected Bug#247036: Can't make multiple partitions bootable; Windows XP undetected Changed Bug title. retitle 247093 [i386] [beta4] [businesscard] Kernel keeps rebooting after system is installed Bug#247093: Kernel keeps rebooting after system is installed Changed Bug title. retitle 247095 [powerpc] [beta4] [businesscard] qualified success on iBook G4 Bug#247095: qualified success on iBook G4 Changed Bug title. retitle 247101 [i386] [beta4] [CD] qualified success Bug#247101: Sarge d-i beta4 installation to Dual-Opteron PC Changed Bug title. retitle 247114 [i386] [beta4] [CD] keyboard locks up Bug#247114: installation-reports Changed Bug title. retitle 247119 [i386] [20040315] [CD] qualified success Bug#247119: Debian Installation Report Changed Bug title. retitle 247216 [hppa] [beta4] [netinst] fails in Retrieving coreutils Bug#247216: beta4 on hppa - fails in Retrieving coreutils Changed Bug title. retitle 247255 [hppa] [beta4] [netinst] gets stuck retreiving coreutils Bug#247255: Sarge Beta4 hppa report
Processed: 259922
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 259922 partman Bug#259922: Swap partition marked as Linux Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'. retitle 259922 Swap partition marked as Linux instead of Linux swap Bug#259922: Swap partition marked as Linux Changed Bug title. tag 259922 d-i Bug#259922: Swap partition marked as Linux instead of Linux swap There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: 259903
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 259903 moreinfo Bug#259903: installation reports There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259903: Debian bug #259903
Regarding your installation report for Debian, I'm told that yaboot has the options install and expert but not install-safe. Could you please confirm exactly what you did at the install prompt? Thanks for your installation report. Mark Hymers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: 255835
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 255835 Can't load sr_mod on sparc64 Bug#255835: (no subject) Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: m68k install daily build broken ?
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: Hi, i tried to install on a Qudra 840av and basically it doesnt work how i try it. There is a complete lack of documentation on how to unstuff the .sit files These are mac-specific images, which you need to read by using StuffIt Expander (under MacOS) or by using the hfs-utils on an hfs filesystem (under GNU/Linux; put an hfs-formatted floppy in your PC system, and copy away). -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of grub-installer_0.51_i386.changes
grub-installer_0.51_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: grub-installer_0.51.dsc grub-installer_0.51.tar.gz grub-installer_0.51_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of partman-lvm_18_i386.changes
partman-lvm_18_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-lvm_18.dsc partman-lvm_18.tar.gz partman-lvm_18_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of floppy-retriever_0.34_i386.changes
floppy-retriever_0.34_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: floppy-retriever_0.34.dsc floppy-retriever_0.34.tar.gz floppy-retriever_0.34_all.udeb load-floppy_0.34_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of net-retriever_0.37_i386.changes
net-retriever_0.37_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: net-retriever_0.37.dsc net-retriever_0.37.tar.gz net-retriever_0.37_all.udeb download-installer_0.37_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of cdrom-retriever_0.30_i386.changes
cdrom-retriever_0.30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdrom-retriever_0.30.dsc cdrom-retriever_0.30.tar.gz cdrom-retriever_0.30_all.udeb load-cdrom_0.30_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of languagechooser_1.27_i386.changes
languagechooser_1.27_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: languagechooser_1.27.dsc languagechooser_1.27.tar.gz languagechooser_1.27_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of partman-md 12
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 249153 + fixed Bug#249153: Sync changes from partman-lvm (15) There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 250971 + fixed Bug#250971: prompts about writing changes to disk even when there are no changes Tags were: d-i Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of partman-lvm 18
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 250971 + fixed Bug#250971: prompts about writing changes to disk even when there are no changes Tags were: fixed d-i Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#251291: marked as done (please support serial console installs)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 14:47:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#251291: fixed in grub-installer 0.51 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2004 11:25:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 26 04:25:54 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSwXi-0006kw-00; Wed, 26 May 2004 04:25:54 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25075C069 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 May 2004 13:25:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from baikonur.stro.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (baikonur [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26693-08 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 May 2004 13:25:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sputnik (unknown [62.47.157.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DD95C068 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 May 2004 13:25:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BSwXj-00026q-TU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 May 2004 13:25:55 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:25:55 +0200 From: maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 20042525 install-report, minor glitches: serial console, lvm wishlist Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, SPAMBUGNUMSUBJ,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: daily i386 20040525 uname -a: Linux kourou 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 26. may 2004 ~11h Method: netboot.iso, not proxied via serial cable. Machine: AMD 800 with Via mainboard Processor: Memory: 128 mb Root Device: ide - Maxtor 81280A2 Root Size/partition table: root 90MB hda1, lvm2 1.1 GB hda5 (/home, /tmp, /usr, /var) Output of lspci and lspci -n: :00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133] (rev 02) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133 AGP] :00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 22) :00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 10) :00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 controller] (rev 10) :00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 controller] (rev 10) :00:07.4 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 30) :00:07.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 20) :00:09.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c900B-TPO [Etherlink XL TPO] (rev 04) :00:0d.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq 5880 AudioPCI (rev 02) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage IIC AGP (rev 7a) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] 1) Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] 2) Comments/Problems: daily image very nice, seems quite close to a rc. some minor glitches or wishlists: 1) was my first time lvm usage on d-i: as shown above i wanted 2 partitions for the hard disc one for root and the other for lvm. * maybe i was to quick first, but i choose format the partion for both the partitions, had overseen the use for lvm. when trying to configure lvm it let my do, but it had
cdrom-retriever_0.30_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cdrom-retriever_0.30.dsc to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.30.dsc cdrom-retriever_0.30.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.30.tar.gz cdrom-retriever_0.30_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.30_all.udeb load-cdrom_0.30_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/load-cdrom_0.30_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
floppy-retriever_0.34_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: floppy-retriever_0.34.dsc to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.34.dsc floppy-retriever_0.34.tar.gz to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.34.tar.gz floppy-retriever_0.34_all.udeb to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.34_all.udeb load-floppy_0.34_all.udeb to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/load-floppy_0.34_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partman-lvm_18_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partman-lvm_18.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_18.dsc partman-lvm_18.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_18.tar.gz partman-lvm_18_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_18_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting bugs to severity fixed: 250971 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
grub-installer_0.51_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: grub-installer_0.51.dsc to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.51.dsc grub-installer_0.51.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.51.tar.gz grub-installer_0.51_i386.udeb to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.51_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 251291 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
languagechooser_1.27_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: languagechooser_1.27.dsc to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.27.dsc languagechooser_1.27.tar.gz to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.27.tar.gz languagechooser_1.27_all.udeb to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.27_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net-retriever_0.37_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: download-installer_0.37_all.udeb to pool/main/n/net-retriever/download-installer_0.37_all.udeb net-retriever_0.37.dsc to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.37.dsc net-retriever_0.37.tar.gz to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.37.tar.gz net-retriever_0.37_all.udeb to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.37_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed in NMU of partman-lvm 18
tag 250971 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 14:26:17 -0400 Source: partman-lvm Binary: partman-lvm Architecture: source all Version: 18 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: partman-lvm - Add to partman support for LVM (udeb) Closes: 250971 Changes: partman-lvm (18) unstable; urgency=low . * Martin Michlmayr - Only prompt about writing changes to disk when there actually are any changes. Closes: #250971 * Updated translations: - Bulgarian (bg.po) by Ognyan Kulev - Bosnian (bs.po) by Safir Å eÄeroviÄ - Catalan (ca.po) by Jordi Mallach - Czech (cs.po) by Miroslav Kure - Welsh (cy.po) by Dafydd Harries - Danish (da.po) by Claus Hindsgaul - German (de.po) by Dennis Stampfer - Greek, Modern (1453-) (el.po) by Konstantinos Margaritis - Spanish (Castilian) (es.po) by Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peña - Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide Egaña - Finnish (fi.po) by Tapio Lehtonen - Hebrew (he.po) by Lior Kaplan - Hungarian (hu.po) by VERÃK István - Indonesian (id.po) by I Gede Wijaya S - Italian (it.po) by Stefano Canepa - Korean (ko.po) by Changwoo Ryu - Lithuanian (lt.po) by KÄstutis BiliÅ«nas - Dutch (nl.po) by Bart Cornelis - Norwegian Nynorsk (nn.po) by HÃ¥vard Korsvoll - Polish (pl.po) by Bartosz Fenski - Portuguese (pt.po) by Miguel Figueiredo - Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by André LuÃs Lopes - Romanian (ro.po) by Eddy Petrisor - Russian (ru.po) by Yuri Kozlov - Slovak (sk.po) by Peter KLFMANiK Mann - Albanian (sq.po) by Elian Myftiu - Turkish (tr.po) by Osman Yüksel - Ukrainian (uk.po) by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov - Simplified Chinese (zh_CN.po) by Ming Hua Files: 3778f9ed4f7eb533c398c633063ba52e 626 debian-installer standard partman-lvm_18.dsc fc45ca406cbcfec9df0580d7fd5368f7 33614 debian-installer standard partman-lvm_18.tar.gz 8f6080d79d37d06efc5f9d62138fa7fa 20218 debian-installer standard partman-lvm_18_all.udeb package-type: udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA+W+z2tp5zXiKP0wRAmGtAJ9dX/r3SBhU7LyVG87T1v7BHDtkdwCgtnzU D/3ur96QcRasD3SBt71GWac= =qL+z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of choose-mirror_0.046_i386.changes
choose-mirror_0.046_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: choose-mirror_0.046.dsc choose-mirror_0.046.tar.gz choose-mirror_0.046_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#250971: marked as done (prompts about writing changes to disk even when there are no changes)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:09:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of partman-md 12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2004 03:01:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 20:01:24 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSofU-z3-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 20:01:24 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (200-180-168-057.paemt7003.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [200.180.168.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BCD184AB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 May 2004 03:01:23 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E14BB6E0E4; Wed, 26 May 2004 00:00:32 -0300 (BRT) Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 00:00:32 -0300 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: prompts about writing changes to disk even when there are no changes Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.60 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: partman-lvm Severity: normal Tags: d-i If the first thing I do on starting partman is configure lvm (already have lvm partitions from a prior run), I get a prompt about Write changes to storage devices, that lists no changes. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26 Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US --=20 see shy jo --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAtAhQd8HHehbQuO8RAm5+AKCPAVB8T/PQQ6qvS8qnE3hOvXd9JwCeOacS TPOJcax/p5KpC+zlcQG6vj0= =53He -END PGP SIGNATURE- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT-- --- Received: (at 250971-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 19:09:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 12:09:13 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BluYb-00017D-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:09:13 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F9417F4A; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:09:46 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A7416EE53; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:09:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:09:11 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FWD: Fixed in NMU of partman-md 12 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=p8PhoBjPxaQXD0vg Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 --p8PhoBjPxaQXD0vg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable NAN - Forwarded message from Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] - =46rom: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 14:47:30 -0400
choose-mirror_0.046_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: choose-mirror_0.046.dsc to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.046.dsc choose-mirror_0.046.tar.gz to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.046.tar.gz choose-mirror_0.046_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.046_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259525: Bug#255689: Bug#255439: d-i report
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:12:33AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: [ cloned bug to discover1-data ] Am Mit, den 14.07.2004 um 11:45 Uhr -0500 schrieb Branden Robinson: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:08:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: There's the problem. radeon is not a legal value. Use ati instead. Do not use atimisc, r128, or radeon. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/discover/discover1/discover1-data$ grep Server:XFree86(radeon) pci.lst 1002000bvideo Server:XFree86(radeon) Radeon 7000 [...] 10025c63video Server:XFree86(radeon) RV250 5c63 [Radeon Mobility 9200 M9+] Does that mean, that all these entries should be changed to Server:XFree86(ati)? Yes, please. -- G. Branden Robinson|A celibate clergy is an especially Debian GNU/Linux |good idea, because it tends to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |suppress any hereditary propensity http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |toward fanaticism.-- Carl Sagan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#257595: Bug#257478: installation-report: PowerMac G4
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:09:56PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:55:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: * ugh, this is distressing. d-i created a swap partition but did not construct /etc/fstab such that it would be mounted (the swap partition did not appear at all). I see one reason for this to happen. You specified a swap partition (or d-i did this automatically for you) but then you tried the Guided partitioning tool. In order to start from clean state the first thing this tool does is to set all partitions as unused. Then you canceled the autopartitioning tool and set mount points for the partitions in the way you wanted. The problem is that then you had to specify that you want to use the swap space. I am giving the following title to the cloned bug: When the autopartitioning tool is canceled it should restore the user settings. If you think that there is some other problem, please tell. No; this sounds like a reasonable hypothesis. My memory of this install is getting fuzzy at this point. -- G. Branden Robinson| If you don't think for yourself, Debian GNU/Linux | others will think for you -- to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | their advantage. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Harold Gordon signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Patch for simpler Cardbus handling
ddetect (0.105) unstable; urgency=low [...] * Joey Hess - Load yenta_socket a bit later, after the discover run, because it looked strange to load a module before it said it was detecting hardware. It still loads before any other modules. The whole point of loading yenta_socket early is to load it before discover is run, so that discover will see the additional hardware which is available on the PCI bus after yenta_socket is loaded. Whether it is loaded before other modules or not doesn't matter. But this isn't very nice. Instead, I have now changed the hotplug handler to get the module directly from pci.lst, and enabled hotplug during the module loading phase. Unfortunately I left my Cardbus cards at home so I'm unable to test this. It would be very helpful if somebody with a Cardbus card could test this patch so I can commit it. Thanks in advance. (Please CC me on replies.) -- Pelle ddetect-simplified-cardbus.patch.gz Description: Binary data
Please upload netcfg 0.72
I have changed netcfg to generate hotplug mapping entries for 16-bit PCMCIA cards now, in preparation for the upcoming upload of pcmcia-cs 3.2.5-8 where all network cards are managed by hotplug. Could someone please release and upload netcfg 0.72? Thanks. (Please CC me on replies.) -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: m68k install daily build broken ?
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 08:09:42PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: Hi, i tried to install on a Qudra 840av and basically it doesnt work how i try it. There is a complete lack of documentation on how to unstuff the .sit files These are mac-specific images, which you need to read by using StuffIt Expander (under MacOS) or by using the hfs-utils on an hfs filesystem (under GNU/Linux; put an hfs-formatted floppy in your PC system, and copy away). I know that as i did some admin stuff couple years back when quadras where common. I just pointed out the fact that the installation docs lack this kind of information. Non MacOS users will not be able to install those kind of machines without external help. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134 Heisenberg may have been here. pgpyv8sCVy9kc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Patch for simpler Cardbus handling
Per Olofsson wrote: The whole point of loading yenta_socket early is to load it before discover is run, so that discover will see the additional hardware which is available on the PCI bus after yenta_socket is loaded. Whether it is loaded before other modules or not doesn't matter. Oh right. Sorry. But this isn't very nice. Instead, I have now changed the hotplug handler to get the module directly from pci.lst, and enabled hotplug during the module loading phase. Unfortunately I left my Cardbus cards at home so I'm unable to test this. It would be very helpful if somebody with a Cardbus card could test this patch so I can commit it. In the mean time, I've fixed the ordering. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of ddetect_0.108_i386.changes
ddetect_0.108_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ddetect_0.108.dsc ddetect_0.108.tar.gz hw-detect_0.108_all.udeb ethdetect_0.108_all.udeb hw-detect-full_0.108_all.udeb archdetect_0.108_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#260023: sparc ultra 30 install success -- silo problem seems fixed
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sparc d-i sid daily 20040716 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040716/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso Date: 2004-07-17 Method: How did you install? netinst cdrom What did you boot off? cdrom If network install, from where? debian.oregonstate.edu Proxied? no Machine: Sun Ultra 30 Processor: 296 Mhz Ultrasparc Memory: 256 MB Root Device: 18GB Scsi /dev/sda1 Output of lspci: Creator 3d framebuffer Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O ] Configure network HW: [O ] Config network: [O ] Detect CD: [O ] Load installer modules: [O ] Detect hard drives: [O ] Partition hard drives: [O ] Create file systems:[O ] Mount partitions: [O ] Install base system:[O ] Install boot loader:[O ] Reboot: [O ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Silo 1.4.8 seems to have fixed the initrd loading problem -- this is the exact configuration that had the problem last week. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#244974: marked as done ([sparc] [20040420] [netboot] Kernel panic during boot)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line this has been solved has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2004 22:03:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 20 15:03:37 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from thecave.phys.psu.edu (cartman.phys.psu.edu) [128.118.163.27] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BG3Kn-0004fB-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:03:17 -0700 Received: from cartman.phys.psu.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cartman.phys.psu.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3KM2Vi2021718 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:02:31 -0400 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by cartman.phys.psu.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3KM2VOq021716 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:02:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:02:31 -0400 From: Todd Troxell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation report: sparc ultra2 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-OS: Linux of course : Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 4/20/2004 BETA 3 from: http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc64/netboot/ uname -a: Did not get that far. Similar box says: Linux metacognition 2.4.24-sparc64 #1 Fri Jan 30 18:32:22 EST 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux Date: 4/20/2004 18:00 EST Method: netboot from netboot/boot.img boot from console, not serial Machine: Sun Ultra 2 Creator Processor: Ultrasparc II 200mhz Memory: 1gb Root Device: scsi /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0 Root Size/partition table: didn't get that far Output of lspci: no pci on this box Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[E] Configure network HW: [ ] Config network: [ ] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Netboot died at init with Kernel Panic: Attempted to kill init! Last few messages were: Freeing initrd memory: 1242k freed VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) Warning: Unable to open an initial console. Unimplemented SPARC system call 188 Unimplemented SPARC system call 188 Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! Press L1-A to return to the boot prom -- Todd Troxell [EMAIL PROTECTED] PSU Physics NOC: 814.865.3024 --- Received: (at 244974-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 22:11:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 15:11:08 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp807.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.186] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BlxOe-0006xd-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:08 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.193.193 with login) by smtp807.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2004 22:11:07 - Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7]) by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CAA2DDC1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BlxOd-00055t-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:07 -0700 Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:07 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: this has been solved Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Disposition: inline X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6:
Bug#246492: marked as done ([sparc] [20040427] [netinst] broken busybox modprobe)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:55 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line a fixed busybox has entered testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2004 09:45:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 29 02:45:22 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bleep.blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.60] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BJ86b-0001Ky-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:45:21 -0700 Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i3T9jLpW008830 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:45:21 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i3T9jLWL008828 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:45:21 -0700 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:45:20 -0700 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sparc netinst daily build broken -- broken busybox modprobe Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sparc netinst 2004-04-27 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/20040427/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux dumbluck 2.4.24-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Fri Jan 30 19:06:19 EST 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-04-29 02:30 Method: How did you install? netinstall cd What did you boot off? cdrom If network install, from where? n/a Proxied? no Machine: Sun Ultra 2 Processor: 2 x 167 Mhz Ultrasparc I Memory: 192 MB Root Device: 9GB Scsi /dev/sda1 Root Size/partition table: 8.6 Gb Output of lspci: Serial console Creator framebuffer installed but unused. Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[* ] Configure network HW: [O ] Config network: [O ] Detect CD: [E ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: I needed to use linux rw to get the cd to boot. modprobe of sr_mod failed, apparently it is trying to use the known broken busybox modprobe. Either the kernel on the netinst cd needs to include the cdrom drivers, or the full modprobe needs to be used. (Trying to get busybox to execute modprobe was the problem I was banging my head against when I paused my d-i work two months ago.) BusyBox v1.00-pre10 (Debian 20040415-3) Built-in shell (ash) Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands. ~ # modprobe -v sr_mod insmodsr_mod Using /lib/modules/2.4.24-sparc64/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o insmod: ELF file /lib/modules/2.4.24-sparc64/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o not for this architecture insmod: Could not load the module: No such file or directory modprobe: failed to load module sr_mod -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. --- Received: (at 246492-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 22:11:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 15:11:56 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.182] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BlxPP-0006yy-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:56 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.193.193 with login) by smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2004 22:11:55 - Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7]) by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EBC2DDC1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joshk by
Bug#260025: [Proposal] The locale generation at the prebaseconfig
Package: prebaseconfig Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch d-i * Recai Oktas [2004-07-11 21:08:04+0300] Hi, I'm planning to work on a patch which generates the locale for the selected language at the prebaseconfig stage. There are some pretty good reasons to do so: * As a critical step for i18n, the locale generation should not be part of a kludgy script like termwrap. It deserves a well-defined conf script on its own right. * Some initialization scripts of the installed system may need to reach the locale info found in the /etc/environment file. Indeed, this is the case for console-screen.sh of console-tools and another bug report (#258681) has been filed for keymap.sh of console-common, which refers to this file. In the current implementation, /etc/environment is created at the end of the base-config, which introduces a problem for unicode consoles as explained below. * We modified the keymap handling to resolve a (IMO) serious d-i bug (#251550) somewhat related with the unicode consoles. It seems that a similar solution will be needed for languages using a UTF-8 locale (confirmed for tr_TR.UTF-8). The console must be in the unicode mode under the unicode locales, but _unless_ we consider to rehack [1] the keymap loading mechanism, /etc/environment is the only source to extract the locale info which mandates to install it in the first stage d-i and later use it to switch the unicode mode. In fact, IMHO, such an approach would present the most simple and natural solution for the problem at hand. * By moving the locale generation code to prebaseconfig, one of the central duties of termwrap will be transfered to this package, so we will be able to simplify the termwrap. According to my tests, I can safely state that, termwrap would not be needed at all for languages having a charset of ISO-8859-[1-15]. But it would have to be used mainly for Asian and Cyrillic consoles (not sure for the latter). As a side note, please notice that we wouldn't need to touch the termwrap in an effort to simplify it, till the proposed patch matures enough. So, have you any comments or objections? Regards, [1] The current code base of 'loadkeys' is rather messy, which makes such modifications difficult. Hi, In accordance with my proposal, I prepared a patch set. Please consult to my previous post quoted above to see the rationale behind these changes. Here goes the descriptions of patches attached. Feel free to review them. * 75generate-locales.gz: Prebaseconfig script to install the locale for the selected language. It gets the localecode from the debconf registery and does the following things: (1) Parse (and validate) the localecode (2) Generate the locale (3) Save the generated locale entry in /target/etc/locale.gen (4) Setup the locale environment in /target/environment Considering some possibilites for the future, the script is somewhat over-designed. It is driven by the 'debian-installer/locale' for the moment, but it is quite easy to make it work with multiple locales (changing a few line should be sufficient), though the current i18n design of d-i doesn't supply a multiple language selection feature (providing that one of them is the default). As I confirm from my real life experiences, this feature comes handy when people from different nations share the same computing environment. Perhaps we may add a new debconf menu in languagechooser which could be shown at the low priority. Another possibility which comes to mind regarding the multiple locales feature is that, almost all languages have a Unicode (UTF-8) and a non-Unicode variant locale (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] and fr_FR.UTF-8), so we could install both of them for the user's convenience. I choosed the prebaseconfig package for the script and set the order to '75' (somewhere after the similar scripts, 65languagechooser and 70kbd-chooser). It is perfectly possible to put it another package like languagechooser or even in a separate package of its own. * prebaseconfig-generate-locales.patch: Required patch to add the script to the prebaseconfig package. The script has been heavily tested with a number of languages (to name a few; French, Turkish, Russian, Japanese and Ukrainian), so I think it should be safe to add it to d-i. Please note that, in order to resolve the bug #258681 completely, inclusion of this script is _mandatory_ since it creates the /etc/environment before the 2nd stage installation, and hence, feeds the /etc/init.d/keymap.sh with the locale environment. Regards, -- roktas 75generate-locales.gz Description: Binary data diff -ruN prebaseconfig.orig/debian/templates prebaseconfig/debian/templates --- prebaseconfig.orig/debian/templates Fri Jul 16 14:18:09 2004 +++ prebaseconfig/debian/templates Fri Jul 16
Bug#246959: marked as done ([sparc] [beta4] [businesscard] boot failure with sparc60)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:14:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line ramdisk bug fixed already has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2004 14:47:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 02 07:47:32 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp801.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.180] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BKIFg-0008NU-00; Sun, 02 May 2004 07:47:32 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO gondor.middle-earth) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.251.58.101 with plain) by smtp801.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 May 2004 14:47:31 - Received: from ardo by gondor.middle-earth with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BKIFY-dX-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 02 May 2004 09:47:24 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 09:47:24 -0500 From: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: d-i beta4 boot problem with sun sparc60 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: beta4, official location uname -a: (this is a clean machine) Date: Sun May 2 09:42:10 CDT 2004 Method: netinst cdrom image, businesscard cdrom image Machine: Sun Sparc60 Processor: 2 x 300MHz Memory: 512MB Root Device: (this is a clean machine) Root Size/partition table: (this is a clean machine) Output of lspci: (this is a clean machine) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[E] Configure network HW: [ ] Config network: [ ] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: I get the following error message after the kernel successfully boots: RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 Freeing initrd memory: 1766k freed VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). .j½..Ñ...ɽ½Ñ.¡.áÑÉ..¥±..å.Ñ.µ¥.5)QÉå¥...ѽ.µ½...½±..ɽ½Ñ.ѽ.½¥.¥ÑÉ..½-.e 01:00: rw=0, want=4097, limit=4096 attempt to access beyond end of device 01:00: rw=0, want=4098, limit=4096 attempt to access beyond end of device 01:00: rw=0, want=4099, limit=4096 attempt to access beyond end of device 01:00: rw=0, want=4100, limit=4096 Kernel panic: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. Press L1-A to return to the boot prom I'm getting this with both the netinst and the businesscard image. I've downloaded them using wget and did the md5sum check with success. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ --- Received: (at 246959-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 22:14:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 15:14:17 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.188] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BlxRh-00071R-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:14:17 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.193.193 with login) by smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2004 22:14:16 - Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7]) by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B94F2DDC1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BlxRf-00056K-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:14:15 -0700 Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:14:15 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ddetect_0.108_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: archdetect_0.108_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.108_i386.udeb ddetect_0.108.dsc to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.108.dsc ddetect_0.108.tar.gz to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.108.tar.gz ethdetect_0.108_all.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.108_all.udeb hw-detect-full_0.108_all.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect-full_0.108_all.udeb hw-detect_0.108_all.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect_0.108_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ddetect override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): hw-detect-full_0.108_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitling
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package installation-reports Ignoring bugs not assigned to: installation-reports retitle 247470 [i386] [beta4] [netinst] frontend issues, outdated README on CD Bug#247470: beta4: linux26 problem with NVIDIA TNT2/ASUS P4T553C? Changed Bug title. retitle 247506 [i386] [beta4] [netinst] eval syntax error during debootstrap Bug#247506: installation-reports Changed Bug title. retitle 247518 [i386] [20040504] [jigdo] corrupt logo, race in unmounting Bug#247518: beta 4 logo doesn't show Changed Bug title. retitle 247595 [i386] [beta4] [cd] fb corrupt on console switch, bidi missing Bug#247595: d-i beta 4 installation report (Dual x86) Changed Bug title. retitle 247627 [i386] [beta4] [netinst] no !386 kernels on netinst CD Bug#247627: INSTALL REPORT Changed Bug title. retitle 247650 [i386] [beta4] [pxe] PS/2 keyboard nonfunctional Bug#247650: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. retitle 247657 [i386] [beta4] [netinst] boot sector corruption caused lilo/grub to fail Bug#247657: Debian installer bug report Changed Bug title. retitle 247659 [i386] [beta4] [netinst] no PPPoE, didn't detect partitions, no ALSA configuration Bug#247659: install report (sarge-netinst-beta4) Changed Bug title. retitle 247668 [i386] [beta4] [netinst] LVM root, kernel install (mkinitrd) failed Bug#247668: sarge-netinst-LVM bug Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powerpc netinst iso.
Hello manty, The powerpc netinst iso does not contain any 2.6 kernels .debs, and as thus, it fails to install a debian system using 2.6 kernel, since it tries to install some 2.4 kernels and fails. There are two solutions possible : 1) simply add the 2.6 kernels packages + initrd-tools + module-init-tools + mkvmlinuz. This would mean around 30MB of space used i think. Advantage: it is easy and works. Disadvantage: it grows the netinst iso another 30MB, and joeyh thinks that is too much for a netinst iso. = Additionally, in this case i want to modify the build so that the 2.6 kernels are the default ones, and the 2.4 kernels are the alternative ones, accessed via linux24. 2) split the netinst/businesscard isos into 2.4 and 2.6. This means that the isos will shirnk in size, as we gain around 10-15MB of space for removing those kernels. We duplicate the need of isos also. Here again the standard one will be the 2.6 kernel, and the 2.4 one will be marked with the additional 24 par in the name or something. What do you think of it, can you comment on this ? On what is the cost of both solutions from your point of view ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Processing installation-report #259007
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 259007 ddetect Bug#259007: Package: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `ddetect'. retitle 259007 [i386][beta4][netinst] Fails to detect PCMCIA network cards Bug#259007: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. with 2.4 and CD-ROM drive with 2.6 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. tag 259007 d-i Bug#259007: [i386][beta4][netinst] Fails to detect PCMCIA network cards There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Correcting bug title
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 257099 [i386][beta4][netinst] Fails to detect PCMCIA network cards with 2.4 and CD-ROM with 2.6 Bug#257099: debian-installer: report Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of netcfg_0.72_i386.changes
netcfg_0.72_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: netcfg_0.72.dsc netcfg_0.72.tar.gz netcfg_0.72_i386.udeb netcfg-dhcp_0.72_i386.udeb netcfg-static_0.72_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#258338: marked as done (list of interfaces should say which are wireless)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258338: fixed in netcfg 0.72 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2004 22:56:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 08 15:56:29 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bihob-0007Bj-00; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:56:29 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD036184DE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 22:48:20 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B5B876E8E9; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 18:47:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 18:47:56 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: list of interfaces should say which are wireless Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: netcfg Severity: normal Tags: d-i I can _guess_ that something apparently called a Farallon SkyLINE is a wireless card (though that's not what the OEM put on the card's label), but it'd be nicer if netcfg told me by putting wireless before the card name. This should be easy to do, it knows which cards are wireless already. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26 Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US --=20 see shy jo --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA7c8bd8HHehbQuO8RAmXQAKCv/HBnG0qGuRH1QwDqMgQLBfkfIQCfaBXD gdzp4nvyEhIADnrODL0waYI= =s7hE -END PGP SIGNATURE- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi-- --- Received: (at 258338-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2004 02:08:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 19:08:02 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bm15u-0001eg-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:08:02 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bm10B-0005E7-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#258338: fixed in netcfg 0.72 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: netcfg Source-Version: 0.72 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: netcfg-dhcp_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.72_i386.udeb netcfg-static_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.72_i386.udeb netcfg_0.72.dsc to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72.dsc netcfg_0.72.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72.tar.gz netcfg_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72_i386.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
Bug#258109: marked as done (netcfg-static: IUCV not detected as a point-to-point connection)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258109: fixed in netcfg 0.72 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2004 18:24:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 07 11:24:24 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sine.sctelecom.com (mailbox.sinenomine.net) [192.204.203.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BiH5j-0005yW-00; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:24:23 -0700 Received: from localhost (mailbox.sinenomine.net [192.168.101.9]) by mailbox.sinenomine.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i67IODjb028062 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:24:15 -0400 Subject: netcfg-static: IUCV not detected as a point-to-point connection From: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-vUiLB/f0gjsjrD590V7y Organization: Sine Nomine Associates Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 13:25:07 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS - amavis-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --=-vUiLB/f0gjsjrD590V7y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: netcfg-static Version: 0.72 Severity: important Tags: patch IUCV is a point-to-point connection type, but netcfg-static was not detecting it as such. I have included a patch that fixes this. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing') Architecture: s390 Kernel: Linux 2.4.17 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --=-vUiLB/f0gjsjrD590V7y Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=netcfg-static.patch Content-Type: text/plain; name=netcfg-static.patch; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --- static.c.orig 2004-07-07 14:04:35.0 -0400 +++ static.c2004-07-07 11:54:17.0 -0400 @@ -434,7 +434,8 @@ if (strncmp(interface, plip, 4) == 0 || strncmp(interface, slip, 4) == 0 || strncmp(interface, ctc, 3) == 0 -|| strncmp(interface, escon, 5) == 0) +|| strncmp(interface, escon, 5) == 0 +|| strncmp(interface, iucv, 4) == 0) state = GET_POINTOPOINT; else state = GET_NETMASK; --=-vUiLB/f0gjsjrD590V7y-- --- Received: (at 258109-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2004 02:08:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 19:08:06 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bm15y-0001fA-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:08:06 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bm10B-0005E3-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#258109: fixed in netcfg 0.72 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: netcfg Source-Version: 0.72 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: netcfg-dhcp_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.72_i386.udeb netcfg-static_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.72_i386.udeb netcfg_0.72.dsc to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72.dsc netcfg_0.72.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72.tar.gz netcfg_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72_i386.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
Bug#258852: marked as done (Should use a single word for hostname)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258852: fixed in netcfg 0.72 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 20:38:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 13:38:07 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from neokiwi.student.umd.edu (localhost.localdomain) [129.2.228.234] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjl5L-0003QU-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:38:07 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bjl5J-0002jI-Jv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:38:05 -0400 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:38:05 -0400 From: Jonathan Polley [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040708) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation report Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040710/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso uname -a: Linux neokiwi 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: Sun Jul 11 16:24:30 EDT 2004 Method: bootable cd. Machine: self-built Processor: athlon tbird, 1.3 GHz Memory: 640 MB Root Device: ide, hdb 82 GB Root Size/partition table: hdb1: 80 GB, /, ext3 hdb5: 509 MB, swap done by the all files in one partition autoformatter Output of lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133] (rev 03) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133 AGP] :00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 40) :00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06) :00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 16) :00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 16) :00:07.4 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 40) :00:08.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 08) :00:08.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port (rev 08) :00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT86C100A [Rhine] (rev 06) :00:11.0 Ethernet controller: National Semiconductor Corporation DP83815 (MacPhyter) Ethernet Controller :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5200] (rev a1) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Everything went pretty smoothly, however, the network autoconfigurer wanted to put my hostname as neokiwi.student.umd.edu and my domain name as umd.edu. I don't precisely which DHCP fields these values come from, but you might at least want to truncate the hostname to a single word. --- Received: (at 258852-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2004 02:08:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 19:08:07 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bm15z-0001fY-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:08:07 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bm10B-0005E9-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#258852: fixed in netcfg 0.72 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 17 Jul
Bug#258207: marked as done (netcfg should check for validity of hostname given by the DHCP server.)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258207: fixed in netcfg 0.72 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2004 07:17:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 08 00:17:26 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp2.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0201.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BiT9p-0003DK-00; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:17:26 -0700 Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-2-4-165.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.126.140.165]) by mwinf0201.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1A17130004D6; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:16:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from luther by pegasos with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BiTD8-0004ga-Mw; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 09:20:50 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: netcfg should check for validity of hostname given by the DHCP server. X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59 Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 09:20:47 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: netcfg Version: 0.71 Severity: normal Well, apparently my dhcp server is giving the hostname of 59:69:67:72:32:35:0, which is definitively not a valid hostname, and netcfg informs us of such when i type enter. netcfg should maybe check for the validity of the hostname obtained by dhcp before proposing it to the user. it is doing the check anyway when you chose it, so maybe it should be done at first directly. Also, it would be great if there was some discreet user feedback to inform that this hostname comes from the DHCP server. Maybe a little discreet DHCP chain added somewhere in the dialog ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-powerpc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 258207-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2004 02:08:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 19:08:07 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bm15y-0001fM-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:08:06 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bm10B-0005E5-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#258207: fixed in netcfg 0.72 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: netcfg Source-Version: 0.72 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: netcfg-dhcp_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.72_i386.udeb netcfg-static_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.72_i386.udeb netcfg_0.72.dsc to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72.dsc netcfg_0.72.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72.tar.gz netcfg_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72_i386.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated netcfg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it
netcfg_0.72_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: netcfg-dhcp_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.72_i386.udeb netcfg-static_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.72_i386.udeb netcfg_0.72.dsc to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72.dsc netcfg_0.72.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72.tar.gz netcfg_0.72_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.72_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 257963 258109 258207 258338 258852 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[D-I Manual] Build log for en (18 Jul 2004)
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://home.tiscali.nl/isildur/d-i/log/en.log
===
If you would prefer this message to be send somewhere else,
please send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Updated files ('svn up')
U en/install-methods/install-tftp.xml
Updated to revision 17847.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Powerpc netinst iso.
Sven, You didn't ask for my opinion, but here it is anyway... As a user, I think splitting netinst/businesscard into separate 2.4 and 2.6 isos is a wonderful idea. The fewer unneeded Megabytes I have to download and burn before I can get started installing the better! I usually know whether I'm going to want to do 2.6 or 2.4 before I start the download process. I think it's an excellent trade-off. Would it allow the the d-i components on the 2.6 iso to use 2.6-specific features at installation time? Would this be useful? Enjoy! Rick On Saturday, July 17, 2004, at 07:58 PM, Sven Luther wrote: Hello manty, The powerpc netinst iso does not contain any 2.6 kernels .debs, and as thus, it fails to install a debian system using 2.6 kernel, since it tries to install some 2.4 kernels and fails. There are two solutions possible : 1) simply add the 2.6 kernels packages + initrd-tools + module-init-tools + mkvmlinuz. This would mean around 30MB of space used i think. Advantage: it is easy and works. Disadvantage: it grows the netinst iso another 30MB, and joeyh thinks that is too much for a netinst iso. = Additionally, in this case i want to modify the build so that the 2.6 kernels are the default ones, and the 2.4 kernels are the alternative ones, accessed via linux24. 2) split the netinst/businesscard isos into 2.4 and 2.6. This means that the isos will shirnk in size, as we gain around 10-15MB of space for removing those kernels. We duplicate the need of isos also. Here again the standard one will be the 2.6 kernel, and the 2.4 one will be marked with the additional 24 par in the name or something. What do you think of it, can you comment on this ? On what is the cost of both solutions from your point of view ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
