Re: CONFIG_NLS=y in 2.6.39 packages (Was Re: [PATCH base-installer] Update i386 kernel selection for new flavours in wheezy)
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:36 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 05:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 08:38 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 15:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > The '686-bigmem' flavour will be renamed to '686-pae'; support both > > > > > names. > > > > > The '686' flavour will be removed, but we can still offer it if > > > > > available. > > > > > > > > Do you also have patches for d-i's kernel-wedge and the main installer > > > > build? > > > > > > No, I'm not familiar with those. I did the kernel installation > > > selection myself because I've worked on it before. > > > > > > > Also debian-cd will need changes too. Since the latter two are > > > > mainly due to Xen support I can take care of that if you like, although > > > > I think it will depend on the kernel actually being uploaded since I > > > > can't see an easy way to support both names in the main installer build. > > > > > > So it depends on when the d-i team decides to switch to 2.6.39 (or > > > later). But you can get your patches ready before then. > > > > Correct. I'll look into it. > > While I was hacking up an updated kernel-wedge/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 > to use 2.6.39 to test this I noticed that nls_base is now built in > instead of modular, despite CONFIG_NLS=m under debian/config. This is > because various =y options (e.g. CONFIG_PCI_LABEL, CONFIG_JOLIET) now > appear to select NLS... JOLIET has selected NLS since the beginning of git history (covering 3 Debian releases so far), though it shouldn't. Given how many things require NLS, though, we may as well explicitly make it built-in. > Probably not a big deal, nls_base.o is ~5k, but thought I'd mention it. > > It just means that the nls-core-modules udeb goes away. OK. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#626226: Found the fix. Sorry to bother you...
For some reason the linux kernel on the install disk wants to label this serial port ttyS1 not ttyS0 --- even though the previous Linux installation labelled it ttyS0. -- Dr Peter Chubb http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au peterc AT gelato.unsw.edu.au http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au ERTOS within National ICT Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/w4pqnrb6vy.wl%pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au
Bug#626226: d-1: serial console woes
Package: debian-installer Version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso Mon May 9 17:11:24 UTC 2011. I copied this image onto a usb stck with dd if=debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso of=/dev/sdc bs=1M then attempted to boot from it on a Dell Poweredge SC1435 using SOL (serial console) over the IPMI channel. After booting I get a blank screen --- so I hit escape and get a boot prompt. So far so good. Then I do: boot: expert console=ttyS0,57600 Loading /install.amd/vmlinuz. Loading /install.amd/initrd.gz...ready. Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)... Then I see a blank screen and nothing else happens for at least fifteen minutes (that was a long as I had patience for). -- Dr Peter Chubb peter DOT chubb AT nicta.com.au http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au ERTOS within National ICT Australia All things shall perish from under the sky/Music alone shall live, never to die -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/w4aaevz4is.wl%pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
Hi, 2011/5/10 Philipp Kern : > If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can install it > there, too. Otherwise most is explained in [1]. Thanks very much! Could you do the setup, now that you are at it on alain.debian.org, otherwise ping me? Best regards, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. "Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar System, which one day will disconnect us." -- Day DVB-T stop working nicely Video flare: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100510.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktimteru0cabkqvzsc3vckcozuni...@mail.gmail.com
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
Philipp Kern wrote: > This requires a bunch of changes and I'm not aware of all places that need to > be fixed to refer to a new daily build location. But maybe someone else knows > and can do it. > > If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can install it > there, too. Otherwise most is explained in [1]. Thanks, Phil. The places I know of are in debian-cd and debian-www, as well as a few in d-i of course. Plus literally half a million other places that link to ~joeyh/d-i/images. I will have to put up a redirect for a long while.. I do wonder if, now that there is buildd autosigning, it would make more sense to do a source-only upload of debian-installer daily and let it autobuild like any package. This would avoid the SPOF of it being on a single buildd, and let us use the whole buildd infractrucure for logs, etc. Only likely problem I can see is it might be too big a hit on the mirrors. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bises, pisiens un, protams, aktīvais otdihs
Aprīļa žurnāla numurā lasi smieklīgus aprakstus par pāris vīru potences nedienām un to, kā tie malači ar to tika galā. Tāpat uzzini, kur nopirkt kvalitatīvus med-preperātus, un kā onkuļiem gāja makšķerējot Peipusā. Nepalaid garām mūsu galvaspilsētas ietekmīgāko mauku kniebēju stāstus par saviem piedzīvojumiem! pārlasi pats: http://goo.gl/h4wMn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110510014342.9a67713a7...@liszt.debian.org
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel May 09 15:22 joey@box build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: armel May 09 15:39 joey@box build_kirkwood_network-console http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_kirkwood_network-console.log * FAILED BUILD: armel May 09 15:46 joey@box build_orion5x_network-console http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log * FAILED BUILD: armel May 09 15:55 joey@box build_versatile_netboot http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_versatile_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel May 09 16:07 joey@box build_ads_cf http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_ads_cf.log * OLD BUILD:mips May 08 00:11 buildd@ball build_malta_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mips May 08 00:15 buildd@ball build_r4k-ip22_cdrom-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r4k-ip22_cdrom-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mips May 08 00:17 buildd@ball build_r4k-ip22_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r4k-ip22_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mips May 08 00:20 buildd@ball build_r5k-ip32_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r5k-ip32_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mips May 08 00:23 buildd@ball build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mips May 08 00:23 buildd@ball build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_miniiso.log * OLD BUILD:s390 May 01 00:03 buildd@zandonai build_generic http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log * OLD BUILD:s390 May 01 00:03 buildd@zandonai build_tape http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_tape.log Totals: 160 builds (5 failed, 8 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qjbix-0008jg...@ravel.debian.org
Bug#626220: Did not support Intel 82579LM Gigabit Ethernet (needs current e1000e)
Package: debian-installer Severity: normal I recently installed Debian stable on a Lenovo ThinkPad X220. This laptop has the following ethernet controller: 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection (rev 04) Current versions of the e1000e driver handle this card just fine, but I'd guess the e1000e driver in stable's kernel doesn't. I ended up having to install via wireless. - Josh Triplett -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110510004248.5662.34881.reportbug@leaf
Bug#626219: Installer could not detect booted USB drive in USB3 port
Package: debian-installer Severity: normal I just installed Debian on a Lenovo ThinkPad X220, starting from the Debian stable installer. This laptop has several USB ports, including a USB3 port. I originally booted the installer from a standard USB (non-USB3) drive in the USB3 port. It booted successfully, but the booted system could not see the drive, so it could not load the rest of the installer components. - Josh Triplett -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110510003855.5534.66253.reportbug@leaf
Bug#626217: Default /etc/kernel-img.conf should have do_symlinks=no; nothing needs those links now
Package: base-installer Severity: normal Now that the various bootloaders have hooks to handle kernel installation, or otherwise automatically handle all kernels via their actual paths, do_symlinks doesn't seem necessary anymore. Please consider defaulting it to "no". - Josh Triplett -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110510001738.4232.41485.reportbug@leaf
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
On 2011-05-09, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2011-05-09, Christian PERRIER wrote: >> We need a Debian Developer with access to build daemon machines and >> the required knowledge of how they work to be able to set things up. > Meh, noted as a to-do. i386 is now lands on [0]. (biber still needs its fstab fixed, so it might break with the next reboot, but a ticket is filed with DSA for that.) This requires a bunch of changes and I'm not aware of all places that need to be fixed to refer to a new daily build location. But maybe someone else knows and can do it. If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can install it there, too. Otherwise most is explained in [1]. Kind regards Philipp Kern [0] http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/ [1] https://buildd.debian.org/git/di-autobuild.git -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnisgt1v.m0h.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
Bug#616014: marked as done (netboot: netboot image find no harddisk also "fdisk -l" find nothing.)
Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2011 23:22:36 +0100 with message-id <201105092322.36462.el...@debianpt.org> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #616014, regarding netboot: netboot image find no harddisk also "fdisk -l" find nothing. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 616014: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616014 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: debian-installer-6.0-netboot-i386 Version: 20100912 Severity: important File: netboot I boot form the debian-edu tjener and gets the boot screen select my installation. The system boots and stops in partman. If I log in onto a other console and try fdisk -l also nothing is found. This happens with virtualbox and also with real hardware. A other netinstaller "fai" works fine. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package already migrated to 6.0.1a. [2011-03-17] Accepted 20110106.squeeze1 in squeeze -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org --- End Message ---
Bug#76244: download of base doesn't check for available disk
As stated in other similar bugs, InstalledSize has no use in case of multiple partitions as the installed files will end on different partitions. -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105092315.06684.el...@debianpt.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 594201 wishlist Bug #594201 [debootstrap] debootstrap: unhelpful error message when out of disk space Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > merge 399686 594201 Bug#399686: debootstrap should fail when there is no more diskspace. Bug#594201: debootstrap: unhelpful error message when out of disk space Merged 399686 594201. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 594201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594201 399686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=399686 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130497913913739.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 619700 + pending Bug #619700 [debootstrap] Please consider using the build-essential package instead of Build-Essental: yes Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619700 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13049767606596.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#625974: grub installer should remind which partition Debian's / was installed on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 625974 grub-installer Bug #625974 [installation-report] grub installer should remind which partition Debian's / was installed on Bug reassigned from package 'installation-report' to 'grub-installer'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625974: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625974 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130497291225375.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#625974: grub installer should remind which partition Debian's / was installed on
reassign 625974 grub-installer thanks Miguel Figueiredo, le Mon 09 May 2011 21:15:42 +0100, a écrit : > On Saturday 07 May 2011 14:30:46 Samuel Thibault wrote: > > When the question > > about where grub should be installed, he took the default "sda" while > > he actually wanted to install it on the 2nd hdd >[...] > > I don't remember which package provides the debconf question and didn't > > find with a quick search, thus submitting to installation-report for > > triaging. > > IIUC it's this one: > > 70 Template: grub-installer/bootdev Indeed. > 71 Type: string > 72 # :sl2: > 73 _Description: Device for boot loader installation: > 74 You need to make the newly installed system bootable, by installing > 75 the GRUB boot loader on a bootable device. The usual way to do this is > to > 76 install GRUB on the master boot record of your first hard drive. If you > 77 prefer, you can install GRUB elsewhere on the drive, or to another > drive, > 78 or even to a floppy. > 79 . > 80 The device can be specified using GRUB's "(hdn,m)" notation, or as a > device > 81 in /dev. Below are some examples: > 82 - "(hd0)" or "/dev/hda" will install GRUB to the master boot record > 83 of your first hard drive (IDE); Mmm, actually that may be a bit misleading, because in SATA cases, the first hard drive is actually /dev/sda. Depending on the machine, you may even have both /dev/hda and /dev/sda... > 84 - "(hd0,2)" or "/dev/hda2" will use the second partition of your > 85 first IDE drive; > 86 - "(hd2,5)" or "/dev/sdc5" will use the first extended partition of > 87 your third drive (SCSI here); > 88 - "(fd0)" or "/dev/fd0" will install GRUB to a floppy. Thanks, Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110509202821.ga17...@const.famille.thibault.fr
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
Hi, 2011/5/9 Christian PERRIER : > By the way, I use this opportunity to mention that Joey already said a > couple of times he would be happy to drop builds on his machine in > favor of an autobuilder. It probably "just" needs someone with the > required knowledge and access to setup a daily build of D-I on the arm > autobuilder. > Is there someone who would be ableto do this among the ARM porters? I can do that. I'll ask to the relevant teams and do it. It'll take me a while. > PS: we have the same wish for i386 daily builds, actually. I cannot do that one, but I'll pester the teams. Cheers, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. "Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar System, which one day will disconnect us." -- Day DVB-T stop working nicely Video flare: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100510.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=_4LOuCKT-g=fqyk6wnjodj8s...@mail.gmail.com
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
On 2011-05-09, Christian PERRIER wrote: > We need a Debian Developer with access to build daemon machines and > the required knowledge of how they work to be able to set things up. Meh, noted as a to-do. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnisg4h0.l6e.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
Am Montag, den 09.05.2011, 12:59 +0200 schrieb Christian PERRIER: > Quoting Martin Michlmayr (t...@cyrius.com): > By the way, I use this opportunity to mention that Joey already said a > couple of times he would be happy to drop builds on his machine in > favor of an autobuilder. It probably "just" needs someone with the > required knowledge and access to setup a daily build of D-I on the arm > autobuilder. > > Is there someone who would be ableto do this among the ARM porters? > > PS: we have the same wish for i386 daily builds, actually. Please could you declare this wish for i386 daily builds further in detail? What are the requirements for this person you seek? I was a HP-UX System Administrator in the past, have some knowledge about Debian, Linux from Scratch and Gentoo... also. Would this help and will be okay? Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304954797.14245.537.camel@monastir.tunisia
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
Am Montag, den 09.05.2011, 11:13 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess: > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > make: *** [build_orion5x_network-console] Error 2 > > > > I actually tried to reproduce this problem on my ARM box yesterday and > > couldn't. Joey, does your build nmachine have very little RAM? Can > > you try to run mkdns323fw manually to see what's going on? > > 128 mb. > > [2973130.877150] Out of memory: Kill process 20562 (mkdns323fw) score 724 or > sacrifice child > [2973130.885353] Killed process 20562 (mkdns323fw) total-vm:96936kB, > anon-rss:91056kB, file-rss:0kB In the past if I had a problem with low ram size I staarted to use a swap partition and the problem was solved. May be this would help you, too? Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304955124.14245.547.camel@monastir.tunisia
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
Quoting Peter Littmann (peter.littm...@kpl-consulting.de): > Please could you declare this wish for i386 daily builds further in detail? > > What are the requirements for this person you seek? > > I was a HP-UX System Administrator in the past, have some knowledge > about Debian, Linux from Scratch and Gentoo... also. We need a Debian Developer with access to build daemon machines and the required knowledge of how they work to be able to set things up. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > make: *** [build_orion5x_network-console] Error 2 > > I actually tried to reproduce this problem on my ARM box yesterday and > couldn't. Joey, does your build nmachine have very little RAM? Can > you try to run mkdns323fw manually to see what's going on? 128 mb. [2973130.877150] Out of memory: Kill process 20562 (mkdns323fw) score 724 or sacrifice child [2973130.885353] Killed process 20562 (mkdns323fw) total-vm:96936kB, anon-rss:91056kB, file-rss:0kB -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: D-I daily builds for i386 stopped since May 5th
Christian PERRIER wrote: > We have the following issue: > > > * OLD BUILD:i386 May 05 22:02 joey@wren build_cdrom_isolinux > > > > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log > > > .../... > > It seems that i386 daily builds are stopped since last Thursday. Some kind of dns issue, worked around. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
Quoting Martin Michlmayr (t...@cyrius.com): > I actually tried to reproduce this problem on my ARM box yesterday and > couldn't. Joey, does your build nmachine have very little RAM? Can > you try to run mkdns323fw manually to see what's going on? > > (Unfortunately, the TS-209 image later on fails to build because of > size problems.) By the way, I use this opportunity to mention that Joey already said a couple of times he would be happy to drop builds on his machine in favor of an autobuilder. It probably "just" needs someone with the required knowledge and access to setup a daily build of D-I on the arm autobuilder. Is there someone who would be ableto do this among the ARM porters? PS: we have the same wish for i386 daily builds, actually. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
* Christian PERRIER [2011-05-09 08:10]: > > * FAILED BUILD: armel May 08 18:11 joey@box build_orion5x_network-console > > > > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log > > mkdns323fw -k ./tmp/orion5x_network-console/dns-323/kernel.uboot -i > ./tmp/orion5x_network-console/dns-323/initrd.uboot -p 7 -c 1 -m 1 -o > ./dest/orion5x/network-console/d-link/dns-323/netboot.img > make[2]: *** [dns-323] Killed > make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2 > make: *** [build_orion5x_network-console] Error 2 I actually tried to reproduce this problem on my ARM box yesterday and couldn't. Joey, does your build nmachine have very little RAM? Can you try to run mkdns323fw manually to see what's going on? (Unfortunately, the TS-209 image later on fails to build because of size problems.) -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110509101922.gq12...@jirafa.cyrius.com
Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)
Hello, Am Montag, den 09.05.2011, 08:10 +0200 schrieb Christian PERRIER: >mkdns323fw: Hope this helps: mkdns323fw: mkdns323fw creates firmware images suitable for upload to the D-link DNS-323 and other, similar devices based on the same basic firmware DNS-323: ShareCenter Twin (DNS-323) Gigabit Network Storage - a "NAS"-device Peter > Hello, > > dring armel daily builds of D-I, we seem to get this error: > > > * FAILED BUILD: armel May 08 18:11 joey@box build_orion5x_network-console > > > > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log > > > mkdns323fw -k ./tmp/orion5x_network-console/dns-323/kernel.uboot -i > ./tmp/orion5x_network-console/dns-323/initrd.uboot -p 7 -c 1 -m 1 -o > ./dest/orion5x/network-console/d-link/dns-323/netboot.img > make[2]: *** [dns-323] Killed > make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2 > make: *** [build_orion5x_network-console] Error 2 > > I have no idea what mkdns323fw is...but it seems to be used only for > that build. > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304923093.3758.1446.camel@monastir.tunisia
