Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:26, Christian PERRIER wrote: >> Major bummers from recent d-i installations: >> - it's not possible to install with raid+lvm because it fails while >> installing grub (see #662086). >> - and kfreebsd daily builds (and installations) are failing; >> >> Are these blockers for a1, a2 or even b1? > > > None of these are IMHO blockers for a1. Of course, the RAID+LVM > failure is a blocker for b1 (either there is visibility that it can be > fixed, or we need to drop the feature). Agreed. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkow-hnxgthc1lden51px9ysvkjsrcps6qfgfxjns2z...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 16:06, Miguel Figueiredo wrote: >> I do need help to manage the missing steps and testing. Is someone >> willing to help on it? > > Count with me for testing installation images. > Can you elaborate remaining steps where we can help? To what we had for a1 basically: get CD images built (Steve, yey!); test them finish announce mail mail to to d-d-a if all above work >> I'm sad to ask for it but I won't be able to take it by myself and do >> need your help. > > I'm sure my opinion is shared with many others, we are glad to participate > :) After a1: check new and current bugs that has known fixes or are easy to fix work on those start preparing a2 / b1 -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkr9o0lutzp9pkp2zg1vbrdv4nmeomgaqo_w9ttn4o0...@mail.gmail.com
[RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1
Hello, I've been trying to get around to finish d-i release but I've been failing; I am involved in a huge project at work and haven't had much free time et all so I couldn't finish it. I do need help to manage the missing steps and testing. Is someone willing to help on it? I'm sad to ask for it but I won't be able to take it by myself and do need your help. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrzkwpPdzd1KUJ5t0eFF8jzBeAc+gn=zZPJRf6F=hy...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#659208: Bug#668860: /usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/90bsd-distro: gawk: not found
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:42, Joey Hess wrote: > Looking at the lack of any explanation attached to #659208, > I am very tempted to revert it. CCing Otavio since he seemed to find > some value in that bug that I don't see. Agreed in reverting it for now. > Also, why was #659208 not closed when it was applied? Why was its added > file not fixed to use the same indentation as the rest of os-prober? > This seems badly handled all around. I didn't close it because not the full patch has been applied; The patch needs to be reworked to work with awk and also follow the indenting code rules of os-prober (my fault in not catching it). Once it is done we can apply it again. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkp6etmr3j-m3yv26itgktm1ce6hsnv5it3wthwu+e7...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 13:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:51 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> I'm traveling but today tonight I'll upload the built installer. > > That was nearly two weeks ago now; what's the current status? Mostly OK; I need to do some tests and get last changes migrated to get images built using those changes. > Were you aiming to include the recent base-installer changes regarding > kernel selection? If so the upload probably shouldn't have been > urgency=low... :-/ Yes, I do. base-installer os-prober partman-auto-lvm partman-partitioning Those ought to migrate. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoHucmrmC2jqRfggT8WiBCEX=bpQEOmokJUZ3e+xqu5=w...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#667703: [task-desktop] Please install Synaptic Package Manager
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 02:15, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Filipus Klutiero (chea...@gmail.com): > I agree with the idea of graphical environments to need a graphical > package manager (though, for LXDE and Xfce, one might argue that users > of these environments are probably looking for a "not-too-bloated" > environment and therefore could maybe deal with a text-based package > manager). > > Before adding this, I'd like to get comments from other tasksel > maintainers (that would be Otavio and/or Joey). I agree as well; I see the tasks as a "work out-of-box soltion for most people". The people who wants to get something smaller can do it byhand and are expect to have the need skiils to know the tools he/she are choosing.I vote to add it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoGqY_tx2R4JewcuAZs_V7Q58i03LPz-GKR9EJJ=ar...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
I'm traveling but today tonight I'll upload the built installer. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br Em 26/03/2012 13:57, "Adam D. Barratt" escreveu: > On 25.03.2012 11:30, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 13:14 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 18:37 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> > On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 14:37 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> > > win32-loader >>> > >>> > Not done yet, pending confirmation from ftp-master that it's okay to do >>> > so before the corresponding files in /tools/ have been updated. >>> >>> On that note - ftp-master, any preferences for order? :-) >>> >> >> Mark said it was okay to migrate, so I've added an unblock hint for >> tonight's britney run. >> > > win32-loader has now migrated. As it turns out, the files in /tools/ had > inadvertantly been updated already (due to a bugette which has now been > removed). > > Regards, > > Adam >
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 09:49, Julien Cristau wrote: >> Waiting the kernel >> > No you're not, the kernel is the same in wheezy and sid. I didn't see it migrated. I am uploading installer as other packages waiting here (nbd and win32-loader) are not in initrd. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkqk2219e9gs4p0kl6krikrdekbdsep7cwj--dguxl0...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 09:34, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:55:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> I'd like to propose following timeline for alpha1 of installer: >> >> * until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded >> * until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded >> * on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing Done, except by the kernel we're depending on so we're waiting for the fixed 3.2 kernel be uploaded so we can migrate it to testing. >> * once the packages are migrated (depends on the item above) we do >> the upload of installer Waiting the kernel -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKpT2GectH2+tbj16pQ=hrRY=jabaajeq9g7vy2foem...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> partman-ext2r0 > > Done. Note that the new source package appears to be full of .git > cruft. Will check it. >> partman-nbd > > Not done. The files client.c, oef and opdr have all disappeared and a > chunk of code has changed in resolv.c, without any mention in the > changelog. Wouter can you comment on that? >> pkgse > > Did you mean "pkgsel"? yes, sorry. >> linux-2.6 > > Nope. It's plenty old enough, but FTBFS on s390*. There's no way it > can migrate until that's fixed. Ok. >> win32-loader > > Not done yet, pending confirmation from ftp-master that it's okay to do > so before the corresponding files in /tools/ have been updated. Ok. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkqrvz-5x-xrpw3s2myvhzsaqhcir9sskofnc5cuas1...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
Hi Release Team, On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote: > * on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing Please age the following packages: arcboot-installer brltty cdebconf cdrom-detect cdrom-retriever colo-installer debootstrap elilo-installer finish-install flash-kernel fonts-samyak fonts-smc grub-installer installation-report iso-scan mdcfg media-retriever net-retriever network-console nobootloader os-prober partman-auto partman-auto-crypto partman-auto-lvm partman-auto-raid partman-basicmethods partman-btrfs partman-crypto partman-efi partman-ext2r0 partman-ext3 partman-jfs partman-md partman-nbd partman-newworld partman-partitioning partman-prep partman-reiserfs partman-ufs partman-xfs partman-zfs pkgse prep-installer quik-installer rescue sibyl-installer silo-installer user-setup yaboot-installer zipl-installer linux-2.6 win32-loader Regards, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkp8xsrsxcri_spksfumgvjdt7_at_tdf+ayk56sdst...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 18:07, Didier Raboud wrote: > Would it be possible to have win32-loader migrated as part of d-i on 03/17 > too? I'll ask for it with the other packages. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkri4kpj7vwbt-pl6yrqgy8z2cs5cwgt2hbnj+768sm...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFC: auto-load of D-I drivers in GNU/kFreeBSD
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 19:07, Robert Millan wrote: > I'm proposing a new plan to factor in the lack of libstdc++6-udeb: > > 1- Add devd-udeb package (by linking libstdc++ statically into the executable) For me this looks the the right way to go for now. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkol2sqx4730su4ypnlrdcg1elnmzldxop7ut-ouqmk...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 20:20, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:33:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> Dunno if we can consider it a blocker for a1 and we can do binNMU if >> needed later as well. >> > It's fixed already. I'll do translation mass-upload tomorrow during day and night. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkrj0rgtczvhcdvrc+1dqsodvve8hebwdkrrwaqrhch...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 16:47, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> * until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded >> * until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded >> * on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing > > Are there any non-installer-specific packages on that list that either > haven't been uploaded yet, or have non-small changes that haven't been > in unstable for very long? Not that I am aware of, except the change on installer itself that I want to do after a1 release to have it autobuilding. > Does this also imply a new kernel upload to fix the mips* ext3-modules > issue? (r18812 in kernel SVN) Dunno if we can consider it a blocker for a1 and we can do binNMU if needed later as well. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKorJ-ehRKFUQCBHLVrZ5NAONbCDOaQL7mvMhYatPD5=s...@mail.gmail.com
Re: libstdc++6-udeb package (Re: RFC: auto-load of D-I drivers in GNU/kFreeBSD)
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 17:27, Bastian Blank wrote: > Reducing libstdc++ with mklibs is tricky, so only the unreduced lib can > be included into the boot image. C++ is controversial, because the > output is usually rather large. IIRC you stared working on a reduced stdc++ library, didn't you? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpjsrj7_gc6ms1evb2sndopvi96hh2muehvxfqaejf...@mail.gmail.com
Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
Hello, I'd like to propose following timeline for alpha1 of installer: * until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded * until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded * on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing * once the packages are migrated (depends on the item above) we do the upload of installer If it all does well, we could have it done in two weeks ... I'd like to know if someone has any objection with the above otherwise I plan to start following it. Comments? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoCe=vf39cwnpbbphjhgoibtt27ajqhapydfmjmwuz...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#654317: Needs creation of /usr/share/man/man1
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:22, Neil Williams wrote: > Once it fails, get to the install menu and select "Execute a shell" > then create a single directory: > > mkdir /target/usr/share/man/man1 > > Then exit the shell and continue the installation. Can you paste the syslog of the installation so we can try to figure which one depends on it? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkr5jpgedlecifmgvtxhf642knbct7x+767yzb3o7bn...@mail.gmail.com
[PATCH] Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching
From: Otavio Salvador
To try to work out of box for most situations we use
/etc/debian_version to detect default to use host source.list
information to detect from which suite to grab udebs from but allow
to be overridden by auto-builders.
After this change, following use-cases are covered:
- Building from UNRELEASED code: default to unstable;
- If /etc/debian_chroot exists, check it for experimental;
- Otherwise, use package suite as target.
The logic behind this behavior change consider those facts:
- No upload will be done using 'stable' or 'oldstable' as target
suite (code checks for it and fails);
- BinNMUs set the target suite according.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
debian/changelog |3 +++
debian/rules | 20 +---
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 38fd990..3af02bf 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -189,6 +189,9 @@ debian-installer (2011) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* Replace kbd-chooser with console-setup-udeb+kbd-udeb, and
console-keymaps-* with console-setup-*-ekmap.
+ [ Otavio Salvador ]
+ * Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching.
+
-- Jurij Smakov Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:02:22 +
debian-installer (20110106) unstable; urgency=low
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 60e2f41..07318af 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -3,14 +3,28 @@
ARCH=$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH)
VERSION=$(shell LC_ALL=C dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Version: | cut -d ' ' -f
2)
DATE=$(shell echo $(VERSION) | cut -d '.' -f 1)
-SUITE=$(shell LC_ALL=C dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Distribution: | cut -d ' '
-f 2)
-ifeq (${SUITE},UNRELEASED)
+
+PKG_SUITE=$(shell LC_ALL=C dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Distribution: | cut -d
' ' -f 2)
+
+ifeq (${PKG_SUITE},$(filter ${PKG_SUITE},stable oldstable))
+ @echo "ERROR: you need to use suite codename for installer uploads."
+ @exit 1
+endif
+
+ifeq (${PKG_SUITE},UNRELEASED)
USE_UDEBS_FROM=unstable
+USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=0
TRANSSTATUS=
BOOTMENU_BEEP=n
else
-USE_UDEBS_FROM=wheezy
+EXPERIMENTAL_TARGET=$(shell [ -e /etc/debian_chroot ] && grep -q
'experimental' /etc/debian_chroot && echo "yes" || echo "no")
+ifeq (${EXPERIMENTAL_TARGET},yes)
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=experimental
USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=0
+else
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=${PKG_SUITE}
+USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=1
+endif
TRANSSTATUS=translation-status
BOOTMENU_BEEP=y
endif
--
1.7.9.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1329926885-7205-1-git-send-email-ota...@debian.org
Re: Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> +BUILDD_TARGET=$(shell [[ -e /etc/buildd_target ]] && sed
> 's,sid,unstable,g' /etc/buildd_target || echo "")
> +ifeq (${BUILDD_TARGET},)
> +USE_UDEBS_FROM=$(shell grep -q '/sid$' /etc/debian_version && echo
> "unstable" || cat /etc/debian_version)
>
> Right now, on a stable system, that will result in USE_UDEBS_FROM being
> set to "6.0.4". That doesn't seem like it will do anything useful,
> particularly as there's no such directory in dists/ (there's a
> "Debian6.0.4" symlink, but I imagine that trying to get apt to use that
> is unlikely to work well).
>
Ok; I can fix this using "lsb_release -c -s" in case it is not unstable.
> I realise that the plan is for it to be handled via the new variable, I
> just wonder if there's an alternative approach that doesn't rely on
> changes to every {old,}stable, testing and experimental build chroot. I
> pondered suggesting parsing sources.list, but then realised that won't
> work if sources.list.d files are in use.
>
I did a version that parsed sources.list before but it has too many
possible complications here.
> > This would allow us to have the experimental building working, using
> > experimental buildds, and use unstable for beta and rc releases. When
> > stable comes, buildds can set the suite according too.
>
> Has this been discussed with the buildd folks yet, given they'd need to
> be the ones adding all the flag files?
Only at Debconf; after that no. We ought to discuss this with them too.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#659089: os-prober changes: Linux and *BSD detection
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 07:03, Gavrilin Andrey wrote: > I have changed Linux detection and I have added *BSD detection. We > will use It for Mandriva/ROSA. > > 50mounted-tests: UFS partions > 90linux-distro: hierarchy > 90bsd-distro: FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD > I'd like to ask you to separate those changes. The bsd support seems fine and I liked the linux refatory but would like to get some feedback from Colin on this one. To we advance faster on this, please prepare one patch with only the bsd changes so we can merge it until the refactory is under review. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching
[ Please reply to debian-boot ]
To try to work out of box for most situations we use
/etc/debian_version information to detect from witch suite to
grab udebs from but allow for overriden by auto-builders.
After this change, following use-cases are covered:
- Building from UNRELEASED code: default to unstable;
- If /etc/buildd_target exists, use this for suite (to be used by
buildds)
- Otherise, use /etc/debian_version to detect the suite to use.
This would allow us to have the experimental building working, using
experimental buildds, and use unstable for beta and rc releases. When
stable comes, buildds can set the suite according too.
Comments?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 6a72e0607272838ffdc462fba0f06e429a14dfe6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Otavio Salvador
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 04:04:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching
To try to work out of box for most situations we use
/etc/debian_version information to detect from witch suite to grab
udebs from but allow for overriden by auto-builders.
After this change, following use-cases are covered:
- Building from UNRELEASED code: default to unstable;
- If /etc/buildd_target exists, use this for suite (to be used by
buildds)
- Otherise, use /etc/debian_version to detect the suite to use.
---
debian/changelog |3 +++
debian/rules | 15 ---
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index e40cee1..188fb05 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -182,6 +182,9 @@ debian-installer (2011) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Jurij Smakov ]
* Update kernel version to 3.2.0-1.
+ [ Otavio Salvador ]
+ * Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching.
+
-- Jurij Smakov Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:20:41 +
debian-installer (20110106) unstable; urgency=low
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 60e2f41..385c6eb 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -3,14 +3,23 @@
ARCH=$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH)
VERSION=$(shell LC_ALL=C dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Version: | cut -d ' ' -f 2)
DATE=$(shell echo $(VERSION) | cut -d '.' -f 1)
-SUITE=$(shell LC_ALL=C dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Distribution: | cut -d ' ' -f 2)
-ifeq (${SUITE},UNRELEASED)
+
+PKG_SUITE=$(shell LC_ALL=C dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Distribution: | cut -d ' ' -f 2)
+
+ifeq (${PKG_SUITE},UNRELEASED)
USE_UDEBS_FROM=unstable
+USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=0
TRANSSTATUS=
BOOTMENU_BEEP=n
else
-USE_UDEBS_FROM=wheezy
+BUILDD_TARGET=$(shell [[ -e /etc/buildd_target ]] && sed 's,sid,unstable,g' /etc/buildd_target || echo "")
+ifeq (${BUILDD_TARGET},)
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=$(shell grep -q '/sid$' /etc/debian_version && echo "unstable" || cat /etc/debian_version)
USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=0
+else
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=${BUILDD_TARGET}
+USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=1
+endif
TRANSSTATUS=translation-status
BOOTMENU_BEEP=y
endif
--
1.7.9
Re: daily build 12/12/11 amd64
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 21:49, Richard wrote: > > >> Hi, I'm still having trouble understanding exactly where you're trying > > >> to say this problem happens. But anyway, it would be better to submit > > >> this as a bug against the debian-installer package. Make sure to > > >> describe exactly the menu items you're selecting (text install, > > >> graphic, expert?), and even describe the screens that do work so we > > >> can get a feel for where this happens. > It seems you're using another distribution as a workaround until we fix debian-installer so people grab the following information to us: Please run: lsusb -v > lsusb.txt lspci -knn > lspci.txt lsmod > lsmod.txt dmsg > dmesg.txt and send those attached, and gzipped, to this mail please. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#654866: Graphical install does not detect keyboard and mouse in weekly-build image
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:28, Prema wrote: > In the Debian Weekly build image of 02-Jan-2012 , the "Install Graphical" > option does boot in a graphical mode. But it is not detecting the keyboard > and mouse.,so no way to get the error log also. > What is your keyboard model? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 07:42, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 12/17/2011 05:12 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > And while we might > > debate the usefulness of a separate /usr back and forth, I think I can > > safely say that it won't become a *recommended* configuration anytime > > soon. :) > > I do recommend a separate /usr to anyone. It's *not* safe to say that, > and I know many people that agree with me. To me, it has, and still is, > the best choice. You have no rights to arbitrary decide what should > be/was/will be the recommended configuration. Your choice is not more > valid than mine, and (computer) science isn't about majorities anyway. Sure but Debian Installer defaults are. End point. > ... > In most general cases nowadays, we *do* have huge disks. Just have a > look into what's available in the marketplace. If you lack space in one > of the default partitions, you can resize using LVM anyway. > New users will think LVM is something to eat with bread or similar. This is mostly as if I starting to try to convince to use Awesome WM as default desktop install because I think it is more user-friendly (and it is, for my type of use, but not for general use). I do think you ought to stop to try to push your personal opinion too hard... it is clear on this thread that most people do not agree with you so lets go ahead and move topic. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#648567: Wheezy installer : No usb detection on Sheevaplug (marvell armel kirkwood), installer stop with mess "Error while running 'modprobe -v usb-storage'"
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:01, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:39:17PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > The installer image above is an old image from January. Otavio: we > > > should either ask ftp-master to remove that old 20110106+b1 build > > > from the wheezy directory, or make an upload of current d-i (or do > > > both). Can you take care of this? > > I will do an upload of installer soon so we check how it goes in > autobuilders. > > I presume that would pick the old rootskel? Or we'd need to NMU klibc > in unstable with the fix for the klcc issue (the patch provided by > Ubuntu is applyable onto the 1.5 in unstable). > Having klibc NMUed is required. Can you handle it? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#648567: Wheezy installer : No usb detection on Sheevaplug (marvell armel kirkwood), installer stop with mess "Error while running 'modprobe -v usb-storage'"
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 16:21, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Alain SAURAT [2011-11-13 03:11]: >> The installer has been downloaded from here : >> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/wheezy/main/installer-armel/current/images/kirkwood/netboot/marvell/sheevaplug/ >> >> When running installation, just after setting time zone, the >> installer try to detect hardware and stop with mess "Error while >> running 'modprobe -v usb-storage'". > > The installer image above is an old image from January. Otavio: we > should either ask ftp-master to remove that old 20110106+b1 build > from the wheezy directory, or make an upload of current d-i (or do > both). Can you take care of this? I will do an upload of installer soon so we check how it goes in autobuilders. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkp7azwauaf5glra1drrt-kj6fmyrjyfhyzgae6ya0n...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Removal of linux-kernel-di-* packages?
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 21:34, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il 19/11/2011 20:15, Otavio Salvador ha scritto: >> Yes, they can be removed. > > Cool, I'll file RM bugs for the following packages, then: > * linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6 > * linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6 > * linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 > * linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6 > * linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6 > * linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6 > * linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 > * linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 > * linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 Please do. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKqPü1ML8e9D7o6=umpntrtgaqxobdaouuf1w9yaq...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal: convert all udebs to xz compression
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 17:21, Philipp Kern wrote: > Otavio, > > am Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 04:55:12PM -0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 23:14, Otavio Salvador >> wrote: >> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 13:26, Philipp Kern wrote: >> > ... >> >> So my proposal is to switch the udeb compression default in dpkg to xz >> >> for wheezy, when the busybox and udpkg changes have landed. Then most >> >> udebs will get a translation upload anyway, if not they can be binNMUed >> >> to pick up the right compression. >> > ... >> > From my side you have a "go ahead" but I'd like to hear from Colin and >> > Joey if they can think about any con about doing it. >> What is the current status of it? > > blocked on inconclusive feedback of the dpkg devs on using the extreme variant > of xz (see #647915). We could start with -z0 of course, which would be > supported by dpkg-dev and hence a trivial patch of debhelper would do. > But it doesn't gain that much. Dpkg people, can you comment on that? I've pinged people on IRC already about this bug earlier today. > In other news I didn't yet upload the udpkg change because I waited for a > busybox upload to incorporate the already committed unxz inclusion. This has already been done. Please go ahead with udpkg then :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkr2m9qyvrapbsvsnzsl3zcz3wl0vw68_pscpjayqq8...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Removal of linux-kernel-di-* packages?
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:45, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi, > > can linux-kernel-di-* sources and related binary packages be removed > from unstable? Reading at [0] and [1], binaries should be provided by > linux-2.6 already. > > [0] > [1] <20110831125857.ga21...@thrall.0x539.de> > > P.S. Keep me CCed in replies, thanks! Yes, they can be removed. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKq6ZhHubFde09-DLSSqQ9JQ=tkm_87qz9egebajwxl...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#647211: Mini image uses old kernel
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 01:33, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 12:49:17AM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >>>>I'm not objecting to the fact that "mini" uses an older kernel; but >>>>I object rather strongly to this being completely undocumented. >> >>> Which mini image? A URL would be handy, as I'm not sure what you might >>> be using. >> >>http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso > > Hmmm, OK. That's using a d-i and kernel build from *squeeze*, not > sarge as you said to start with, I'm guessing a simple mistake on your > part when typing that! :-) > > It's also a mini netboot image which is the domain of the debian-boot > team. Forwarding there for comment... There's no release of installer yet, since squeeze, thus this still points to the current installer. We plan to get one running soon. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpg60potofdd+iz72hzvtq3qmbfh833mpqkwx9r9db...@mail.gmail.com
Re: D-I changes needed for xterm transition (Re: (forw) Debian installer failed builds)
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 09:41, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/11/2 Robert Millan : >> 2011/10/31 Aurelien Jarno : >>> Oh, I didn't realized you only uploaded kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64. I am >>> going to work on it soon. >> >> If you update kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386, beware not to use 8.2-12 (still >> not uploaded), it'd break a few places in D-I (I'm currently looking >> at those). > > Here's a list of issues that would arise when using TEKEN_XTERM > kernels with current D-I: > > - debian-installer-utils needs x/xterm installed -> I committed this > to GIT, D-I folks is it okay to upload now? It was uploaded. > - rootskel sets TERM=cons25 but only when this variable wasn't set. > This probably has no effect. I did the change on rootskel but can't upload it as it fails to build due libklibc fault. > - busybox sets TERM=cons25 Changed; will ask for it to be uploaded soon. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkqqtkc1-s-pnso1hzxzbbcvtbtdplrp9g99qecibvd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal: convert all udebs to xz compression
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 23:14, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 13:26, Philipp Kern wrote: > ... >> So my proposal is to switch the udeb compression default in dpkg to xz >> for wheezy, when the busybox and udpkg changes have landed. Then most >> udebs will get a translation upload anyway, if not they can be binNMUed >> to pick up the right compression. > ... > From my side you have a "go ahead" but I'd like to hear from Colin and > Joey if they can think about any con about doing it. Philipp, What is the current status of it? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkp_1cxyzsyj86fqebqguwynu9jushzrjopx3wr1fh5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal: convert all udebs to xz compression
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 13:26, Philipp Kern wrote: ... > So my proposal is to switch the udeb compression default in dpkg to xz > for wheezy, when the busybox and udpkg changes have landed. Then most > udebs will get a translation upload anyway, if not they can be binNMUed > to pick up the right compression. ... >From your detailed analisys it does seem it is safe to move this way. The increase in busybox size is quite small and it seems to be the right time to do that change as we'll have enough time to have feedback about it. >From my side you have a "go ahead" but I'd like to hear from Colin and Joey if they can think about any con about doing it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpetpvmrrxwcqyycsh9glfjwtkfi3gc4yep4_oysdb...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#647406: please consider removing #debian-boot reference from installation guide
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:54, Samuel Thibault wrote: ... > suggesting #debian-boot there is probably not a good idea indeed. > Anybody against the change? I support the change. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKom6gfhg=u7y3xhwdhwqqtgkyq-vlnm5r_rsx0nbkp...@mail.gmail.com
Re: cdimage bugs script
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:56, Steve McIntyre wrote: ... > We're expecting to use this to help warn people about possible bugs, > to save them from wasting time and bandwidth downloading images that > may not work for them due to known bugs. To report something and make > it appear here, report a bug against: > > Package: cdimage.debian.org > Tag: d-i > Version: "daily-image-.*", "weekly-image" or ".*-image" ... Better, use the script on d-i repository for it. It is at: scripts/send-cdimage-broken-image-bug Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoSLdpBqVu9rZLsV9sWZu8dZZH2+PNfGdB+MpS2GLD=2...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Running cdebconf. Status and RFC
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 20:20, Regis Boudin wrote: ... > Anyway, I'm quite keen to make an upload, though a quick double check > before I do would be welcome. ... I don't feel confortable enough with debconf to double check it but I do want to thank your commitment to this. Awesome work :) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKpK;t0h+ymt4jxn2s7vg31beyo4t485q5rww48xe...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#645308: tg3 broken for NetXtreme 5714S in squeeze 6.0.3 installer
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:07, Marc Haber wrote: ... > this is a regression from 6.0.2.1 to 6.0.3. > > The IBM HS12 blade server has a Broadcom network chip: > > 04:04.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme 5714S > Gigabit Ethernet [14e4:1669] (rev a3) > 04:04.1 Ethernet controller [0200]: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme 5714S > Gigabit Ethernet [14e4:1669] (rev a3) ... > > Manually running modprobe -r tg3, modprobe tg3 on a shell allows the > installation to continue. The squeeze OS installed by the installer > has working network immediaely. > > With a 6.0.2.1 amd64 netinstall CD, things are just fine. ... It does seem to be a kernel issue so I reassigned it according. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrtEnWGSYwGE+yB5KHhO2WASyHA2opQVg9aufrR1U=y...@mail.gmail.com
Re: os-prober: bsd detection and new linux detection
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:16, Joey Hess wrote: > Hello. I work at ROSA Lab. It's a partner of Mandriva. We will use os-prober > for our installer. These are my improvements. I talked to him and he is working at producing a new patch that doesn't depends on bash and going to send it again. Andrew, can you post it here? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKomp+zjen-cbMwg-b3F+1UGrLhAb0OO+W=rw9jza4k...@mail.gmail.com
Re: do-upload fails on !i386 for partman-nbd
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 13:26, Wouter Verhelst wrote: ... > I've locally patched that out, so I can at least do an upload now, but > I'm not sure what this bit is supposed to do. Anyone? Does the attached patch works for you? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br Index: do-upload === --- do-upload (revisão 66957) +++ do-upload (cópia de trabalho) @@ -7,16 +7,17 @@ source=`grep Source debian/control | sed 's,.*: ,,g'` # Set the architecture to use for the build -arch=`grep Architecture debian/control | head -n 1 | sed 's,.*: ,,g'` -if echo "$arch" | grep -q "`dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH`"; then - arch=`dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH` +pkg_arch=`grep Architecture debian/control | head -n 1 | sed 's,.*: ,,g'` +sys_arch=`dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH` +if echo "$pkg_arch" | grep -q "$sys_arch"; then + pkg_arch="$sys_arch" else - arch=`echo $arch | cut -f 1 -d\ | sed 's,-any$,-i386,g'` - if [ "$arch" = "any" ] || [ "$arch" = "all" ]; then - arch=`dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH` + pkg_arch=`echo $pkg_arch | cut -f 1 -d\ | sed "s,-any$,-$sys_arch,g"` + if [ "$pkg_arch" = "any" ] || [ "$pkg_arch" = "all" ]; then + pkg_arch="$sys_arch" fi - if [ "$arch" != "`dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH`" ] && + if [ "$pkg_arch" != "$sys_arch" ] && echo "$CROSSBUILD_BLACKLIST" | grep -q "$source"; then echo "ERROR: '$source' package is unsafe for crossbuilding." exit 1
Re: [Parted-maintainers] Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 14:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: >> 2011/9/22 Arno Töll : >> > To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug >> > fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u >> > (#637020): >> > >> > Bug # -- package -- title >> > 635384 -- parted -- detection of ZFS volumes (ZVOL) >> >> Colin et al, any chance this can make it to Squeeze point release? >> It's the last non-DI package in Arno's list. > > If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to > push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given > that the partman-* changes won't be included? Might it not make more > sense to look at the remaining changes as a set for 6.0.4? For me, 6.0.4 seems more realistic as all that wouldn't need to be done in a rush. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpmfsq0rcxhrkxtqo_dr8t34oxrsjp2bf1o1xdoqpy...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-5)
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 00:15, Ben Hutchings wrote: ... > Assuming that we don't find any more problems with the changes in > experimental to use kernel-wedge, I will apply those to unstable as > well. I'll need to upload kernel-wedge yet again with Joey's fix for > the bug that affected s390. That's awesome :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKqd3X-8Speu6Hm7=pw1e45ywd5q1ynkljgq3e6nwq5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#637111: pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 08:04, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt : >> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +, Robert Millan wrote: >>> * Move libsbuf.so.0 to /lib (needed by /sbin/zfs and /sbin/zpool). >>> (Closes: #637100) >>> * Move libipx.so.2 to /lib (needed by ifconfig). >> >> Have the portions of this change which affect the udebs been run past >> the d-i team? > > They're in testing and being used for new builds already. > > In any case, D-I team please if you have any objection to libsbuf.so.0 > and libipx.so.2 being in /lib, please let us know. These libraries > are needed in /lib because zfs and zpool are linked with them, see > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636668#55 for the bug > report. No problem from our POV. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrFD8q4CVz4UtsA_7j4pA=qctptuszweg0qlqeebq6...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Adding syslinux-udeb
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 13:34, Daniel Baumann wrote: ... > i therefore intend to add a syslinux-udeb shipping two files: mbr.bin > (~440byte) and syslinux (~55k). please give the required ack in order to > allow me to proceed with the upload of syslinux (which has to go through NEW > for that). ... I see no problem in adding it specially because it is quite specific to the live target. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkqve2mqr2461cyzn8rsvzyezg7m2pkatb+gwlh_zfd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 19:00, Hector Oron wrote: > I really fail to see what's wrong on this build and also the cdimage ones. > Is daily build aggregator playing with us? :-) The log seems incomplete. Maybe space constraints in the builder? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkrvzxfcjervpq1b5cygqvpvp826-tbn4qfqnf_npux...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#639958: installation-reports: Sun Ultra 10 with Creator 3D needs video=atyfb:off
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 21:26, Andreas Bombe wrote: > Initial boot was somewhat problematic, as the system appeared to freeze after > a > few lines of kernel output. Since keys such as Caps and Num Lock still reacted > and the last message was about disabling the boot console, I surmised that it > switched to another output such as serial or ATI instead of the Creator 3D to > which the monitor was attached. > > The solution was to retry with "boot net video=atyfb:off". The rest of the > installation process worked flawlessly. Can you try to boot using Weekly build? So we can know if the kernel has fix this issue or we reassign it to linux-2.6 if it keep not working. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoC08wBOyZFLLG5M=iy2DM=m6ocyn7kipjwg6cqgt8...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Removal of linux-modules-di-* packages
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:58, Philipp Kern wrote: > can the linux-modules-di-* packages be removed from unstable? They seem to be > built against 2.6.30 anyway and hence not useful. If so I can file the RM > bugs. Yes; those can be removed. Thanks by handling it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkqewuawwogd_wiybc6mtvvwf0m+o-jfp1fyjfc+cfl...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Installation report [failed] [Was: Re: "No kernel modules were found" PowerPC Businesscard and Netinst daily CDs]
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:15, Rick Thomas wrote: > Install went without a hitch until it came time to reboot into the newly > installed system. Did you try to install a more recent image? If don't, could you give it a new try and send us the syslog (gzipped) thus we can guess what have went wrong? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKryTCOopb=JF7Rp0AR+hq+FSiJD=hb-nbzqpfvimr3...@mail.gmail.com
Re: converting a hostname to an IP address
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 08:50, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > As such, I'd need to a name lookup of the servername the user provided > me with, preferably in a shell command, so that when root-on-NBD is > used, I can provide the user with a working command line (i.e., an > nbdroot= parameter that specifies the server by IP address, not > hostname). I am not aware of any easy way for doing that but I'd suggest you to take a look in BusyBox to see what it can offer you to solve this. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoeijM0Gf=Fs=h9rscmpn9j_k66o05w+fw1n59tl56...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#637289: installation-reports: Installation Debian Wheezy weekly-builds 08-08-2011 text=successful gui=not good
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:12, Luis Guzman wrote: ... > Successful booting from USB stick and presented with all options: Install (via > text), Graphical Install, Advanced Options, Help, Install with Speech > Synthesizer. All menus where visible and the same was true for KDE, XFCE, LXDE > menus. > I initially tried to install via GUI but when presented with the interface, > the > text was not shown. > All I saw were square boxes where text should be. ... Samuel, Are you able to reproduce it? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpbnzhiksp54c5ab_qz10gmssddfcacjqgvofosss6...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#629695:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:51, Andrey Gursky wrote: > Sorry I've discovered this bug report only recently. I'm dealing with > this failure since about 4-5 months. And I'm wondering what is the > purpose of weekly generated DVD-images when the distribution can't be > installed from them during the last 4-5 months? I am sorry to read this but it seems it has been working for most people and you/Virtual Box has something that makes it to not work as expected. > How to reproduce this? It would be enough straightforward to install > that what has been generated on DVD-1 weekly image. I'm doing it every > week under VirtualBox. The saved logs (from integrated WEB server) are > attached. >From the syslog it seems to be a bug we fixed during Debconf11. Do you mind to test using latest weekly builds? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoan2=sjvnsj-qsd9ob7eikt2okj+qimec6naqatew...@mail.gmail.com
Re: cdebconf progress
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 07:44, Christian PERRIER wrote: ... > I, for one, would vote for uploading to unstable. It is time to test > *now*. Closer to wheezy release might be too laste. > > Wait for Joey, Colin, Otavio's input about all this before proceesing, > though. I am with Christian on that; please upload it to sid. > PS: great job, Régis, anyway. I can't understand your changesbut I bet > they are those who will put us on the way to have cdebconf ready to > really replace debconf. Reminds me that I worked to have all > debconf-depending packages to depend on "debconf | > debconf-2.0"before the releaseof lenny! +1 :-D -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkroqk4kxfcpi88vscwbkpavswvmjomwkcgmenk0n2t...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Changes to Debian Installer release process
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 22:12, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): >> Mostly; the only addition situation we'll need to rebuild the >> installer is when the amount of translation changes for a specific >> language so we get the 'translation-status' file updated into the >> initrd. > > We might need to find a way to avoid rebuilding just because *one* > language changed. Mostly because this happens really often..we don't > really have control about the translator's schedule and they happen to > commit things more or less randomly (with peaks when something is > changed in a string, or when strings are added: some like to be 100% > all time long..:-)). But this will change only when we upload the package to the archive so we can try to upload a set of packages with translation updates to avoid this. Basically the binNMU would be triggered when the translation status change for a language and since we work with percentage this will not change on every translation update. > As I'm watching all this very regularly, we could maybe imagine > something where the i18n coordinator can trigger an l10n-rebuild > because (s)he notices that a given language changed significantly > enough to be worth itor because it has been too much time since > the last rebuild and many very small changes piled up. Or maybe if there's no initrd changes queue it to the end of week if nothing else changes? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odko0ent87kdj_cevexzwi+g+iedn8r9__kqgluzn7_u...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [RFC] Use of Built-Using in debian-installer
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:54, Julien Cristau wrote: > Looks sane from a quick look. Can we also see the code that generates > this, maybe? I sent the two patches I have queued to push to mailing list; please comment on them. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkoeo0nn6wtlu+6aabr5qtb0+5_nd4emv46aaj3mxxk...@mail.gmail.com
[PATCH 2/2] Output information of all used udebs into the debian-installer binary package for usage by the archive tool
---
build/Makefile |7 +++
build/util/write-built-using |8
debian/changelog |2 ++
debian/control |1 +
debian/rules |3 +++
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 build/util/write-built-using
diff --git a/build/Makefile b/build/Makefile
index e2c5da0..6ee9089 100644
--- a/build/Makefile
+++ b/build/Makefile
@@ -350,12 +350,19 @@ endif
usedblocks=`echo $$newblocks - $$oldblocks | bc`; \
usedcount=`echo $$newcount - $$oldcount | bc`; \
version=`dpkg-deb --info $$udeb | grep '^ *Version:' |
sed 's/^ *//' | awk '{print $$2}'` ; \
+ source=`dpkg-deb --info $$udeb | grep '^ *Source:' |
sed 's/^ *//' | awk '{print $$2}'` ; \
+ if [ -z "$$source" ]; then \
+ source=`dpkg-deb --info $$udeb | grep '^
*Package:' | sed 's/^ *//' | awk '{print $$2}'` ; \
+ fi ; \
echo " $$usedsize B - $$usedblocks blocks - $$usedcount
files from $$pkg (version $$version)" >>$(TEMP)/diskusage.txt;\
+ echo "$$source (= $$version)"
>>$(TEMP)/built-using.txt;\
oldsize=$$newsize ; \
oldblocks=$$newblocks ; \
oldcount=$$newcount ; \
fi; \
done
+ sort -u < $(TEMP)/built-using.txt > $(TEMP)/built-using.txt.new && \
+ mv $(TEMP)/built-using.txt.new $(TEMP)/built-using.txt
sort -n < $(TEMP)/diskusage.txt > $(TEMP)/diskusage.txt.new && \
mv $(TEMP)/diskusage.txt.new $(TEMP)/diskusage.txt
grep-dctrl -nsPackage,Version,Architecture ''
$(TREE)/var/lib/dpkg/status | \
diff --git a/build/util/write-built-using b/build/util/write-built-using
new file mode 100755
index 000..97beb13
--- /dev/null
+++ b/build/util/write-built-using
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+echo -n "initrd:Built-Using=" >> debian/debian-installer.substvars
+cat build/tmp/*/built-using.txt \
+| sort -u \
+| tr "\n" "," \
+| sed 's/,/, /g;s/, $//g' >> debian/debian-installer.substvars
+echo >> debian/debian-installer.substvars
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index cb9c975..b9fd9d0 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ debian-installer (2011) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Otavio Salvador ]
* Update Linux kernel to 3.0.0-1
* Use upload suite as origin to udebs
+ * Output information of all used udebs into the debian-installer
+binary package for usage by the archive tool
-- Robert Millan Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:34:48 +0200
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index f8e9bbd..9aef650 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ Build-Depends:
Package: debian-installer
Architecture: any
+Built-Using: ${initrd:Built-Using}
Description: Debian installer
This package currently only contains some documentation for the Debian
installer. We welcome suggestions about what else to put in it.
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index a659a5e..9cf4ef0 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ binary-arch: install
-X internals.xml -X partman-doc.sgml
dh_compress
dh_fixperms
+
+ ./build/util/write-built-using
+
dh_gencontrol
dh_md5sums
dh_builddeb
--
1.7.5.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1312051150-13754-2-git-send-email-ota...@ossystems.com.br
[PATCH 1/2] Use upload suite as origin to udebs
---
debian/changelog |1 +
debian/rules |6 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 5a53ac8..cb9c975 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ debian-installer (2011) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Otavio Salvador ]
* Update Linux kernel to 3.0.0-1
+ * Use upload suite as origin to udebs
-- Robert Millan Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:34:48 +0200
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index a434c5f..a659a5e 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -9,8 +9,12 @@ USE_UDEBS_FROM=unstable
TRANSSTATUS=
BOOTMENU_BEEP=n
else
-USE_UDEBS_FROM=wheezy
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=$(SUITE)
+ifeq (,$(filter stable wheezy stable-proposed-updates
wheezy-proposed-updates,${SUITE}))
USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=0
+else
+USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=1
+endif
TRANSSTATUS=translation-status
BOOTMENU_BEEP=y
endif
--
1.7.5.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1312051150-13754-1-git-send-email-ota...@ossystems.com.br
Bug#636040: finish-install: hvc0 console added to inittab even when not available
Hello On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 15:10, Dominic Benson wrote: > Package: finish-install > Version: 2.32 > Severity: normal > > finish-install 90console script checks for the existence of > /sys/bus/xen to determine whether to add a console on > /dev/hvc0 - but in 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 this always appears to exist. Ian, do you mind to have a look at this? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkr9ptc-zvtjmg7tocwdfaaanrhpd5xustfrfyqzba3...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [RFC] Use of Built-Using in debian-installer
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:05, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 16:36, Luk Claes wrote: >> On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this >>> information in the Built-Using field of the binary package. >>> >>> Comments, welcome :-) >> >> Great start, though Built-Using expects source packages instead of >> binary (or udeb) packages. > > Mostly fixed in my local repository; will post it soon. So I got it done; please take a look at it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br control Description: Binary data
Re: Changes to Debian Installer release process
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:04, Luk Claes wrote: ... >> * Debian Installer daily builds to be done from source uploads >> >> The daily builds will use the archive source for building so every >> time we do a change in unstable in a module that is included in initrd >> it will trigger a binNMU in all architectures replicating what we have >> in daily builds. When source changes in debian-installer source >> package are done, a new source upload will be required. > > Do the daily builds only uncover issues from building the initrd? A.k.a. > will changes in packages other than the one in the initrd only have an > effect on the install via genuine downloading from the archive at the > time of the install? Mostly; the only addition situation we'll need to rebuild the installer is when the amount of translation changes for a specific language so we get the 'translation-status' file updated into the initrd. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpinxtg0z7neo1mye-jgrx_lh1tmry0_q3nm1g8z9e...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [RFC] Use of Built-Using in debian-installer
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 16:36, Luk Claes wrote: > On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this >> information in the Built-Using field of the binary package. >> >> Comments, welcome :-) > > Great start, though Built-Using expects source packages instead of > binary (or udeb) packages. Mostly fixed in my local repository; will post it soon. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrBUFEN1GALcK3W9Psyir84frr=rqjrojk2uadpbjd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: "No kernel modules were found" PowerPC Businesscard and Netinst daily CDs
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 07:18, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Is it safe to assume that this problem ("no kernel modules"), which I
> encountered with the wheezy_d-i PowerPC businesscard installer image, is not
> worth worrying about, as long as if doesn't still exist in the Sid_d-i? My
> assumption is that the Sid_d-i will become the wheezy_d-i in the normal due
> course of development, and there is plenty of time for that to happen before
> first Wheezy release sometime in 2013 -- so I should be concentrating my
> efforts on testing Sid_d-i?
Yes; Sid d-i is the development base for the wheezy version so people test it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKqYTL3uBb5PQFfo4-=aslesv1cubdh7t8jo8uha46z...@mail.gmail.com
[RFC] Problems regarding automatic binNMUs
Hello, In debian-installer we have a status file that is used to warn the users depending if their language is not full translate. Currently when we prepare the release upload we run a script that downloads the source of all udebs and prepare a table of the level of translation to each language (example attached). With the use of binNMUs to gather new updates in unstable we will face a problem of how to update this file in the source. My current proposal is: * For each udeb upload: * DAK stores into a table the number of strings and the number of translations for each language * DAK stores a similar file into dists//main/Translation-Status-udeb.txt with the proper values With it, the installer, during the build can download it and keep it updated regarding the translation status of every language automatically. Comments, welcome ;-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br translation-status Description: Binary data
[RFC] Suite to use for next upload - patch included
Hello,
I am considering to use unstable for next upload and for it I did a
try to get suite mostly (more details regarding translation-status
later) done.
Comments, welcome...
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 44f04757bac2ff38ecf796a9cf6a8c5252e4bdbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Otavio Salvador
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 04:04:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use upload suite as origin to udebs
---
debian/changelog |1 +
debian/rules |6 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 865ffdc..78c161b 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ debian-installer (2011) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Otavio Salvador ]
* Update Linux kernel to 3.0.0-1
+ * Use upload suite as origin to udebs
-- Robert Millan Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:34:48 +0200
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index a434c5f..a659a5e 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -9,8 +9,12 @@ USE_UDEBS_FROM=unstable
TRANSSTATUS=
BOOTMENU_BEEP=n
else
-USE_UDEBS_FROM=wheezy
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=$(SUITE)
+ifeq (,$(filter stable wheezy stable-proposed-updates wheezy-proposed-updates,${SUITE}))
USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=0
+else
+USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=1
+endif
TRANSSTATUS=translation-status
BOOTMENU_BEEP=y
endif
--
1.7.5.4
[RFC] Use of Built-Using in debian-installer
Hello, During this night I got some nice progress on the stuff planned to debian-installer. I am adding the generated control file for review and comments. Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this information in the Built-Using field of the binary package. Comments, welcome :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br control Description: Binary data
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 03:00, Daily build aggregator wrote: > Debian installer build overview > --- > > Failed or old builds: > > * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jul 30 00:05 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux > > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log Do someone has any idea what's going on here? I built those fine in my machine... -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkp9f392zcjqwu5muxwrmtkzx+iws8nhh32fxjd0q+e...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Installation report [failed] [Was: Re: "No kernel modules were found" PowerPC Businesscard and Netinst daily CDs]
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 20:59, Rick Thomas wrote: > Colin, do you have any idea when your fix will be available for testing? > Can you let me know when it happens? It is just a matter of waiting a cuple of days. If it doesn't work we can check the build log and see if it has gotten the fixed localechooser or not. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkom-eru9xx+vzjdkv_rp4fovqkxpwv-mdkfqnzhvod...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#498731: --foreign fails due to setup_devices
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 15:39, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> How I can reproduce the issue? > > Actually I wonder where that is documented, or whether it is documented > at all, but what I do is: > > # dd < /dev/zero > foo bs=1M count=1 seek=1000 > # mke2fs foo > # mount foo /mnt > # debootstrap --foreign sid /mnt > # umount /mnt > # kvm -kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.39-2-amd64 -initrd > /boot/initrd.img-2.6.39-2-amd64 -append "root=/dev/sda rw > init=/debootstrap/debootstrap --second-stage" -hda foo > > and hit enter at the resume stage I think I got it working but would be nice if you could test it since I am having trouble with KVM in my laptop at this moment. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrvoMqMVZmnnZ13fb39ZgE=8g5vwd7aw-6mxm0z2yy...@mail.gmail.com
Re: d-i changes
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 16:50, Philipp Kern wrote: ... > * Later on d-i should be fixed not to have the Linux kernel and ABI > version hardcoded. This is not currently considered critical > because it does not happen too often. Some solution needs to be > found that provides d-i with the right version to use (without the > kernel flavour). This is one thing I prefer to not fix since it makes too easy to people to use d-i with untested kernel versions and this is a big problem specially with stable releases since people try to use d-i with newer kernels and this can resuing in different level of problems. Imagine that people could be using lenny installer with wheezy kernel and expect it to run since it built fine. So at least people know that they're changing a hardcoded value and then it's their responsability to deal with it. > So the steps seem to be: ... > 4. Profit and get rid of d-i releases and just handle d-i like any > other package. Let's get rid of Otavio ;-) ... Well, this is my goal too so it will be much eaiser to deal with d-i and to have more people joining the development if it is made easier. Let's work for it to happen :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkrsa71p1ywbc2zc7ng5f5gpidijewgoguo9fqqhzsf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#498731: --foreign fails due to setup_devices
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 14:22, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I indeed don't see anything in the script which copies devices.tar.gz to > the target. How I can reproduce the issue? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpr2ttpmm0b2o1vfgc2h_kgbypoju8zqevn9mf4kap...@mail.gmail.com
Re: "No kernel modules were found" PowerPC Businesscard and Netinst daily CDs
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 13:35, Rick Thomas wrote: ... > PS: The corresponding sid d-i install CD is even worse. It has problems > with choosing a language and can't get far enough to check for kernel > modules. Please get the current (today's) daily from sid and give it a try. If it fails, try to get the syslog so we can see what's going on. We fixed some scanning CD issues yestarday and it might have fixed yours but need confirmation of it. Regarding the language choose if it fails then we need to fix it first since Wheezy built is a week old now. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKr=nabNFaN3cJ=ks2s9hiddedupe_aqx3fybmauprw...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#498731: --foreign fails due to setup_devices
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 00:32, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I haven't yet managed to run the second stage on kfreebsd (I have built > an image that should work, I just don't know how to make kfreebsd start > debootstrap instead of /sbin/init). I have tried with Linux in the > meanwhile, it fails at the device creation step in the second stage: > > E: no /debootstrap/devices.tar.gz. cannot create devices > > This is indeed missing. Did you use the git source? this changed second_stage. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkqqagnajn6xez8_v3_a0fb6gmnwj3p5wjezyjbfhdm...@mail.gmail.com
Changes to Debian Installer release process
I used some of Debcamp and Debconf time this year to discuss the Debian Installer release process with some people and after talking with many people it seems we agreed on the following changes on Debian Installer release process and it would be interesting to receive feedback on those to see if anyone see a problem we didn't notice yet. * Official uploads to be built against unstable Currently when we do a source upload of debian-installer it gather all build-depends on /unstable/ but the udebs from /testing/. We want to get it change and all udebs be fetched from unstable so we will migrate it all to testing when ready and not before building as done currently. This is going to make easier to Debian Installer and Debian Release teams to coordinate the migration of packages to testing. Philipp will send a mail regarding this with more details later. * Linux kernel udebs to be built from linux source package We won't get rid of kernel-wedge instead linux source package will use it during the build process to produce all the kernel udebs from it. Ben will send a mail about this later with a more detailed description. * Debian Installer daily builds to be done from source uploads The daily builds will use the archive source for building so every time we do a change in unstable in a module that is included in initrd it will trigger a binNMU in all architectures replicating what we have in daily builds. When source changes in debian-installer source package are done, a new source upload will be required. * Debian Installer experimental builds With Linux kernel udebs built from linux source we have the possibility to get the installer built against the development kernel that will be available on experimental and this is quite important to us to be able to test all this before it is available in unstable to avoid bad surprises for us and users. This will also be a handy tool for us to play with not well tested or finished stuff without breaking installer to end users. For now, I think we will need to use an infra-structure similar of what we have today for daily builds for those. * Use of britney to handle package and installer migration This is the end of the process and some details are yet unknown how this is going to happen however but our goal is to make it happen since it will alleviate a lot the amount of work to make Debian Installer release to happen. It is important to notice that it is not a single-man effort but a coordinate and shared effort of Debian Kernel, Debian Release and Debian Installer teams to get all this done. Those changes are not going to happen at once but in a progressive process and at the end this is going to make the installer release process easier to understand and handle. Please share your ideas regarding those proposed changes so we can start looking on the required changes to accomplish all this. Thanks in advance, Regards, -- Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odko9_21zxolagenchnte8+xc1p4xr6vxnavugqcwekb...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#631314: [cowbuilder] --create fails when removing original tree
reassign 631314 cowbuilder thanks Hello, I reproduced this problem using cowbuilder at my machine and then started trying to track it down. After checking debootstrap code it seemed it was doing the right thing and thus I created two chroot (regular and buildd) and removed them and all worked fine. It does seem to be an issue with cowbuilder. Reassigning according. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Re: "No kernel modules were found" PowerPC Businesscard and Netinst daily CDs
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 08:41, Rick Thomas wrote: > > We still have this problem. Three weeks later. Did you check current image? We got many issues fixed and would be nice to do a new try. By the way, are you scanning for the ISO or booting it directly? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#635336: debian-installer: USB install: fails to "mount CD"
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:40, Adam Borowski wrote: > ... Boot and initial steps of d-i go just fine. > > However, it later fails at the "Detect and mount CD-ROM" stage. The > machine > happens to physically have one, it's just empty. Trying to skip the stage > doesn't work. Only manually doing: mount -tvfat /dev/sdb /cdrom will let > the installation to continue. > ... We uploaded iso-scan (1.36) with a fix that might solve this issue. Please give a try using tomorrow's daily. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#635400: 20110725 snapshot of testing is not installable using dvd1: missing grub-pc
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:04, Leonid Evdokimov wrote: > ... > Attached copy of /var/log/syslog > It seems that it fails to unmount the DVD (I don't know why) but would be nice if you could try to reproduce it again and pay attation to any detail that might help us to reproduce it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#629146: Not reproducable (bug #629146)
Hello, On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:27, Richard Rafalski < debianb...@richard-rafalski.de> wrote: > Am 27.07.2011 01:08, schrieb Adam Baxter: > > Thanks for testing that, > > Please see if you can attach a text version of those logs - also, > > The sylog from the installation system is attached > ... > I think I understood the problem. Basically the ISOs now doesn't include the stable symlink they used to have (being it stable or not). Now they provide the symlink that reflects the suite they are: testing -> wheezy in this case. I fixed iso-scan to handle it (but couldn't test it locally); please check if tomorrow's daily works for you. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#630000: d-i cannot receive an IP address from Mac OS X
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 15:04, wrote: > ... Maybe it's a good idea to include it into squeeze-p-u, and it's > definitely nice fix to have for sid. I'll apply the patch to > git later today. > Can you prepare a squeeze branch with this fix? This seems quite interesting to have it fixed for next point release. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Re: Bug#610931: Please build wpasupplicant-udeb
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 18:43, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > OK. How do you feel about me NMUing wpa_supplicant to add the udeb? I > added an updated patch for the udeb to this mail. If you are OK I'll > upload this as an NMU after libnl1-udeb enters the archive. It seems that libnl3 is already available and wpa-supplicant has support for it AFAIK so it seems better to get the patch integrated on it to avoid redoing it later. wpa-supplicant also needs to update to use this but seems worth it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#635398: humandev() support for ZFS volumes
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 20:51, Robert Millan wrote: > Please consider this patch to add support for ZFS volumes in humandev(). > Commited but I setted the sublevel to 5 for now. Christian please see if you agree with it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
[RFH] Summary of Debian Installer Team during Debcamp/Debconf
Hello, Debian Press Team has asked[1] for a summary of our tasks and improvements during Debcamp/Debconf and thus I think it would be easier to do that using a wiki page so we can make a good summary of what we did. 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/07/msg4.html Please update the wiki at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Debconf11Summary so after we have the changes we can send them to the press team for them to use it. Thanks in advance, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#635478: debian-installer: Enable VMware modules on installer images.
reassign 635478 kernel-wedge thanks On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:16, Jim Barber wrote: > ... For quite a while now, the linux-image-* packages have had support for > the VMware modules such as vmxnet3 and vmw_pvscsi. > > However, the daily builds for the Debian installer do not. > It would be very handy if at least the vmxnet3 and vmw_pvscsi modules > were enabled by default in the businesscard/netinstaller ISO files. > ... I am reassigning the bug to kernel-wedge since this is where it needs to be fixed and I will deal with it for next kernel upload. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#545933: More information
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 21:27, Torsten Landschoff wrote: ... > > It is likely that the keyboard was the one that came with the mouse I am > currently using, so here is the relevant lsusb output: > > Bus 004 Device 002: ID 046d:c52b Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver > > I guess the kernel module is hid_logitech. > This is included on current installer so please could you try with last dailies to see if you can reproduce it? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#635363: Fake bug to allow testing of cdimage scripts
Package: cdimage.debian.org Version: daily-image-20110725 Severity: critical Tags: d-i This bug is intended to be leave open until the development of the scripts need to warn users that an specific image is not working are being done. Please don't close this bug if you're not involved on this activity. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110725143947.16553.24932.report...@micro.lab.ossystems.com.br
Re: (forw) [SCM] UNNAMED PROJECT branch, master, updated. 34c9cfb5676eb4d97bc661139d6ff58acefb1e49
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:10, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Wouter, isn't there something missing in the way the partman-nbd > directory is setup in D-I's git? I suspect there is a need for > "naming" the project somewhere but can't figure out where. > .git/description I think. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#635053: Choose-mirror overrides mirror/suite and mirror/codename
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 15:30, Tokarski Boleslaw < boleslaw.tokar...@tieto.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Please test it and if it works ping us to review and commit it; >> > I have tested the patch, found one bug, so I am attaching the updated > patch. It worked in my environment, though I might have not considered all > use cases. Can you port your patch to the current version of choose-mirror? the patch doesn't apply in current git version. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#617943: debian-installer: isolated "make build_netboot" fails due to missing 2.6.32 modules
Hello Michael, On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 02:20, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > By default the building system gets the udebs from unstable. This is > > configurated on debian/rules using the building system variable (that > > you ought to take a look at). Another alternative is to use a local > > sources.list.udeb.local file to set it to use the stable suite. > > Hi, various regressions have happened lately. "make build_all" doesn't > get around this issue any more. Also, changing udeb sources doesn't > work anymore, "USE_UDEBS_FROM=unstable make build_netboot". > Please tell us about those regressions. Regarding the USE_UDEBS_FROM=unstable I think it is due the KERNELVERSION value set to 2.6.32... more bellow. > I've ended up having to implement a couple different ugly workarounds > to keep my testing snapshot builds going while various things change. > I've had enough frustration dealing with those that I've decided to > come up with a "real" solution. > > The core issue is that KERNELIMAGEVERSION is a hardcoded value in the > arch config files, so its currently stuck at squeeze's version. Thus, > the solution is simply to parse that value from known package info > instead. > I understand your frustation however we have the KERNELVERSION specified in the architecture due technical reasons. The installer itself, sometimes, need modifications or fixes to be able to handle newer kernel versions so the version that is hard-coded on those is the version that is supported by the installer. It is not only a matter of recompile installer against the new kernel (sometimes this works by this is not guaranteed). Another important point is that there are architectures that use different kernels depending on the subarch (e.g armel uses iop32x, kirkwood and others) and dynamically it is more difficult to handle this. Specifically about the patch it is incomplete since it doesn't handle all the architectures thus we can't take it. Friendly, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#634248: debootstrap: Add support for XZ compressed binary packages
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:43, Raphaël Hertzog wrote: > Please can you add support for XZ-compressed .deb and/or tell us which > package should not use XZ compression so that we can modify them > to hardcode gzip usage? It seems XZ support has been included in 1.0.21, as can be seen at: debootstrap (1.0.21) unstable; urgency=low [ Otavio Salvador ] * Apply patch from Clint Adams to add support for gz/bz2/xz data.tar (closes: #458663). ... -- Otavio Salvador Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:11:06 -0300 About the use of xz I see no reason to use for base packages as it has following consequences: * bigger memory footprint; * xz dependecy in host; Specially the extra xz dependency can be problematic when using debootstrap in non-Debian systems. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoWOBXqCFTZuffSatX2_W=5_jcwfesrzwkn+o9+6o_...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#531316: [debootstrap] --foregin for kfreebsd-* fails still - debootstrap to kfreebsd from Linux not possible.
2011/7/24 Paweł Różański :
...
> Package extraction is OK, but then I get:
> W: Failure trying to run: chroot /mnt/temp mount -t devfs devfs /dev
>
> in /usr/share/debootstrap/functions there is:
>
> setup_devices () {
> case "$ARCH" in
> kfreebsd-*)
> in_target mount -t devfs devfs /dev ;;
>
> looks like it should work...
>
> There is /dev/sda5, formatted as ext2 mounted as /mnt/temp.
It shouldn't since it tried to run a kfreebsd binary in your Linux
host. Aurelien, can you take a look at it?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkoqtxvw-ok-ejhnuzjt9mcxirwrt-jsbs4+logpy0g...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#545933: More information
tag 545933 moreinfo thanks Hello, Please provide the output of lsusb with the keyboard connected so we can identify the required kernel module for inclusion. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrkA=1KrgtUGGqAFn01DY4eawQxufAO9a-n7LGO=h4...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#629146: installation-reports: netinst ISO from 6/3/2011 faulty: cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 01:14, Guido Günther wrote: > I can confirm this with the images from today (16-Jul-2011). The > installer looks in dists/stable but the iso has dists/testing. I downloaded and tested an image yestarday and failed to reproduce it; mind to give it a new try? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKofoe09Tw9Zyqmp0QwSSQ_GRg=vsszhrsynndzyvsp...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#605614: debian-installer: Ability to configure remote syslog
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 17:29, Colin Watson wrote: > Oh, and just to clarify: I'll be using both the -L and -R options in > this case, so what will happen is that you'll get local log entries > until such time as the network is configured and both local and remote > log entries after that. Very nice addition :-) this will make life much easier for development as well so you can use it to monitor a virtual machine and so on. Nice! -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrEq-AL=vpv_0e_ls7z6t3z8foariqyj+vxgf16an0...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#634649: os-prober does not detect Windows if there is a /boot folder in the Windows partition
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 16:45, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: > Does NOT work ANY MORE: Now I have got it working again I think; it was a quoting issue. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br diff --git a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft index cb574ec..f270cbd 100755 --- a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft +++ b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft @@ -16,27 +16,40 @@ case "$type" in *) debug "$1 is not a MS partition: exiting"; exit 1 ;; esac +found= # Vista (previously Longhorn) -if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2" && boot="$(item_in_dir boot "$2")" && - bcd="$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot")"; then - if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows 7 (loader)" - elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows Vista (loader)" - elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)" - elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)" - elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)" - elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)" - else - long="Windows Vista (loader)" - fi - short=Windows +if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2"; then + # there might be different boot directories in different case as: + # boot Boot BOOT + for boot in $(item_in_dir boot "$2"); do + bcd=$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot") + if [ -n "$bcd" ]; then + if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows 7 (loader)" + elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows Vista (loader)" + elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)" + elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)" + elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)" + elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)" + else +long="Windows Vista (loader)" + fi + short=Windows + + found=true + + break + fi + done +fi + # 2000/XP/NT4.0 -elif item_in_dir -q ntldr "$2" && item_in_dir -q ntdetect.com "$2"; then +if [ -z "$found" ] && item_in_dir -q ntldr "$2" && item_in_dir -q ntdetect.com "$2"; then long="Windows NT/2000/XP" short=Windows ini=$(item_in_dir boot.ini "$2") @@ -62,18 +75,30 @@ elif item_in_dir -q ntldr "$2" && item_in_dir -q ntdetect.com "$2"; then else long="Windows NT/2000/XP (loader)" fi + + found=true fi +fi + # MS-DOS -elif item_in_dir -q dos "$2" && +if [ -z "$found" ] && item_in_dir -q dos "$2" && [ -d "$2"/"$(item_in_dir dos "$2")" ]; then long="MS-DOS 5.x/6.x/Win3.1" short=MS-DOS + + found=true +fi + # 95/98/Me -elif item_in_dir -q windows "$2" && +if [ -z "$found" ] && item_in_dir -q windows "$2" && item_in_dir -q win.com "$2"/"$(item_in_dir windows "$2")"; then long="Windows 95/98/Me" short=Windows9xMe -else + + found=true +fi + +if [ -z "$found" ]; then exit 1 fi
Bug#634649: os-prober does not detect Windows if there is a /boot folder in the Windows partition
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 15:50, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: > 2011/7/23 Otavio Salvador >> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 15:09, yannubu...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >> I maked a fake environment and tested this patch locally and it seems >> >> to work. Please give it a try and tell me. >> > >> > >> > Sorry, in both cases (with or without /boot folder), I get this output: >> > >> > $ LANG=C sudo os-prober >> > /dev/sda1:::chain >> > /dev/sda5:Ubuntu 10.10 (10.10):Ubuntu:linux >> >> So now it has detected it but failed to handle description; the >> attached patch ought to fix it. > > Fixed in my config. Obrigado Otavio ! Hello, Talking with Colin at #debian-boot we found some possible corner cases and then we end up doing some more changes. Please give this one a final test so I can upload it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br diff --git a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft index cb574ec..71835b4 100755 --- a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft +++ b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft @@ -16,27 +16,40 @@ case "$type" in *) debug "$1 is not a MS partition: exiting"; exit 1 ;; esac +found= # Vista (previously Longhorn) -if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2" && boot="$(item_in_dir boot "$2")" && - bcd="$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot")"; then - if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows 7 (loader)" - elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows Vista (loader)" - elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)" - elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)" - elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)" - elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then - long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)" - else - long="Windows Vista (loader)" - fi - short=Windows +if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2"; then + # there might be different boot directories in different case as: + # boot Boot BOOT + for boot in "$(item_in_dir boot "$2")"; do + bcd=$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot") + if [ -n "$bcd" ]; then + if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows 7 (loader)" + elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows Vista (loader)" + elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)" + elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)" + elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)" + elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then +long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)" + else +long="Windows Vista (loader)" + fi + short=Windows + + found=true + + break + fi + done +fi + # 2000/XP/NT4.0 -elif item_in_dir -q ntldr "$2" && item_in_dir -q ntdetect.com "$2"; then +if [ -z "$found" ] && item_in_dir -q ntldr "$2" && item_in_dir -q ntdetect.com "$2"; then long="Windows NT/2000/XP" short=Windows ini=$(item_in_dir boot.ini "$2") @@ -62,18 +75,26 @@ elif item_in_dir -q ntldr "$2" && item_in_dir -q ntdetect.com "$2"; then else long="Windows NT/2000/XP (loader)" fi + + found=true fi # MS-DOS -elif item_in_dir -q dos "$2" && +elif [ -z "$found" ] && item_in_dir -q dos "$2" && [ -d "$2"/"$(item_in_dir dos "$2")" ]; then long="MS-DOS 5.x/6.x/Win3.1" short=MS-DOS + + found=true # 95/98/Me -elif item_in_dir -q windows "$2" && +elif [ -z "$found" ] && item_in_dir -q windows "$2" && item_in_dir -q win.com "$2"/"$(item_in_dir windows "$2")"; then long="Windows 95/98/Me" short=Windows9xMe -else + + found=true +fi + +if [ -z "$found" ]; then exit 1 fi
Bug#634649: os-prober does not detect Windows if there is a /boot folder in the Windows partition
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 15:09, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
>> I maked a fake environment and tested this patch locally and it seems
>> to work. Please give it a try and tell me.
>
>
> Sorry, in both cases (with or without /boot folder), I get this output:
>
> $ LANG=C sudo os-prober
> /dev/sda1:::chain
> /dev/sda5:Ubuntu 10.10 (10.10):Ubuntu:linux
So now it has detected it but failed to handle description; the
attached patch ought to fix it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 5d7b29a71581e42f258405183cdbe48c8a60dda5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Otavio Salvador
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:44:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Windows detection when there are more then one boot
directories
---
debian/changelog |2 +
os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft | 47 ++--
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 03c7c4f..191d6f1 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ os-prober (1.48) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Otavio Salvador ]
* add MeeGo detection support; thanks to Chengwei Yang
for the patch.
+ * Fix Windows detection when there are more then one boot directories
+(e.g boot and Boot). Closes: #634649.
-- Colin Watson Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:51:13 +0100
diff --git a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
index cb574ec..4c9a6e3 100755
--- a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
+++ b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
@@ -17,24 +17,35 @@ case "$type" in
esac
# Vista (previously Longhorn)
-if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2" && boot="$(item_in_dir boot "$2")" &&
- bcd="$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot")"; then
- if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows 7 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Vista (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
- else
- long="Windows Vista (loader)"
- fi
- short=Windows
+if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2"; then
+ # there might be different boot directories in different case as:
+ # boot/ Boot/
+ for boot in "$(item_in_dir boot/ "$2")"; do
+ # drops the end slash
+ boot=${boot%/}
+
+ bcd=$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot")
+ if [ -n "$bcd"]; then
+ if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows 7 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Vista (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
+ else
+long="Windows Vista (loader)"
+ fi
+ short=Windows
+
+ break
+ fi
+ done
# 2000/XP/NT4.0
elif item_in_dir -q ntldr "$2" && item_in_dir -q ntdetect.com "$2"; then
long="Windows NT/2000/XP"
--
1.7.5.4
Bug#634649: os-prober does not detect Windows if there is a /boot folder in the Windows partition
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 14:10, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Opa!
I maked a fake environment and tested this patch locally and it seems
to work. Please give it a try and tell me.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
diff --git a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
index cb574ec..32556da 100755
--- a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
+++ b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
@@ -17,24 +17,34 @@ case "$type" in
esac
# Vista (previously Longhorn)
-if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2" && boot="$(item_in_dir boot "$2")" &&
- bcd="$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot")"; then
- if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows 7 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Vista (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
- else
- long="Windows Vista (loader)"
- fi
- short=Windows
+if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2"; then
+ # there might be different boot directories in different case as:
+ # boot/ Boot/
+ for boot in "$(item_in_dir boot/ "$2")"; do
+ # drops the end slash
+ boot=${boot%/}
+
+ if bcd="$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot")"; then
+ if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows 7 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Vista (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
+ else
+long="Windows Vista (loader)"
+ fi
+ short=Windows
+
+ break
+ fi
+ done
# 2000/XP/NT4.0
elif item_in_dir -q ntldr "$2" && item_in_dir -q ntdetect.com "$2"; then
long="Windows NT/2000/XP"
Bug#634649: os-prober does not detect Windows if there is a /boot folder in the Windows partition
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 04:11, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
>>
>> I attached a new one and this is more verbose. Please test it.
>
> Bom dia Otavio
Bom dia! :-)
Well, I did a quite stupid mistake in last patch so I am attaching the
fixed one. I hope it works now.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
diff --git a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
index cb574ec..79d0a43 100755
--- a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
+++ b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
#!/bin/sh
# Detects all Microsoft OSes on a collection of partitions.
+
+set -x
+
. /usr/share/os-prober/common.sh
partition="$1"
@@ -17,24 +20,34 @@ case "$type" in
esac
# Vista (previously Longhorn)
-if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2" && boot="$(item_in_dir boot "$2")" &&
- bcd="$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot")"; then
- if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows 7 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Vista (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
- else
- long="Windows Vista (loader)"
- fi
- short=Windows
+if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2"; then
+ # there might be different boot directories in different case as:
+ # boot/ Boot/
+ for boot in "$2" "$(item_in_dir boot/ "$2")"; do
+ # drops the end slash
+ boot=${boot%/}
+
+ if bcd="$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot")"; then
+ if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows 7 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Vista (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
+ else
+long="Windows Vista (loader)"
+ fi
+ short=Windows
+
+ break
+ fi
+ done
# 2000/XP/NT4.0
elif item_in_dir -q ntldr "$2" && item_in_dir -q ntdetect.com "$2"; then
long="Windows NT/2000/XP"
Re: Filesystem encryption question
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 09:22, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2011-07-22, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> 2) two new options into expert-mode installer: >>> -s 512 -c aes-xts-plain64 (future new standard) >>> -s 256 -c aes-xts-plain64 (performance option) >> Please report a bug against partman-crypto so we can handle it. > > It's another variant for #482092 though. Yes you're right. Please Zdenek send a comment to #482092 with those suggestions so it's not forgotten. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKr=VJa6atjwjrOwcj-j06Jam86WHj=vznw9kftzhup...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#634649: os-prober does not detect Windows if there is a /boot folder in the Windows partition
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 18:02, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> 2nd patch does not work either:
I attached a new one and this is more verbose. Please test it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
diff --git a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
index cb574ec..a4520de 100755
--- a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
+++ b/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
#!/bin/sh
# Detects all Microsoft OSes on a collection of partitions.
+
+set -x
+
. /usr/share/os-prober/common.sh
partition="$1"
@@ -17,24 +20,34 @@ case "$type" in
esac
# Vista (previously Longhorn)
-if item_in_dir -q bootmgr "$2" && boot="$(item_in_dir boot "$2")" &&
- bcd="$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot")"; then
- if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows 7 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Vista (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
- elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
- long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
- else
- long="Windows Vista (loader)"
- fi
- short=Windows
+if item_in_dir -q bootmgr; then
+ # there might be different boot directories in different case as:
+ # boot/ Boot/
+ for boot in "$2" "$(item_in_dir boot/ "$2")"; do
+ # drops the end slash
+ boot=${boot%/}
+
+ if bcd="$(item_in_dir bcd "$2/$boot")"; then
+ if grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows 7 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Vista (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8. .R.2." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Server 2008 R2 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.r.v.e.r. .2.0.0.8." "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Server 2008 (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
+ elif grep -qs "W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .S.e.t.u.p" "$2/$boot/$bcd"; then
+long="Windows Recovery Environment (loader)"
+ else
+long="Windows Vista (loader)"
+ fi
+ short=Windows
+
+ break
+ fi
+ done
# 2000/XP/NT4.0
elif item_in_dir -q ntldr "$2" && item_in_dir -q ntdetect.com "$2"; then
long="Windows NT/2000/XP"
Re: Filesystem encryption question
2011/7/16 Zdenek Kaspar : ... > 1) d-i kernel needs to support: CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS and CONFIG_CRYPTO_GF128MUL This is enabled on kernels and now I queued it to inclusion for next kernel uploads. > 2) two new options into expert-mode installer: > -s 512 -c aes-xts-plain64 (future new standard) > -s 256 -c aes-xts-plain64 (performance option) Please report a bug against partman-crypto so we can handle it. > Could such modification be done even in a point release ? I don't think so. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkr3ny5neorn+kfdogm+2yr411sxma0rpgfrj2h-tu3...@mail.gmail.com
