Re: Bad release in install documentation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everybody > El 15/03/16 a las 23:58, Laura Arjona Reina escribió: [...] > >> >> I've tried to (manually) run the build of the installation manual >> for jessie, and I think it went ok. This is what I did, based on >> the lessoften script [1]: >> >> ls -t1 >> /srv/www.debian.org/cron/ftpfiles/pool/installation-guide_*.dsc | >> head -1 >> >> sudo -u debwww dpkg-source -sn -x >> /srv/www.debian.org/cron/ftpfiles/pool/installation-guide_20150423+de b8u >> >> >> >> 2.dsc >> >> cd installation-guide-20150423+deb8u2/build && sudo -u debwww >> manual_release=jessie >> destination=/srv/www.debian.org/installmanual/jessie/ >> ./buildweb.sh > /srv/www.debian.org/installmanual/jessie.log >> 2>&1 >> >> sudo -u debwww cp -a /srv/www.debian.org/installmanual/jessie/* >> /srv/www.debian.org/www/releases/jessie/ >> >> Let's see what happens in the next lessoften build. I think >> stretch manual is not built yet, but maybe it's build after this >> is fixed. If tomorrow after lessoften I see the jessie manual >> fixed, and the stretch manual not appearing, I would try to build >> it manually too. >> >> [1] >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/ 1in >> >> >> >> stallation-guide >> > Ok, it seems the jessie installation guide is published correctly and it's not overwritten with lessoften script. I don't know if there should be a stretch installation guide right now, or only after stretch is published as stable. The page https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/ seems it has no link to the installation guide. The page https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ links to the stable version of the manual, and to d-i.debian.org/manual So I guess this problem is fixed, and everything is ok? (until the next release?). Or do I need to manually generate the stretch version of the installmanual, as I did with jessie? Cheers - -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJW6yhEAAoJEEw4Yb3McGt0XAoL/3yDQKaicITZX4KVf/P59ouK EgaXALgWm2Rq17fVM+Xv2jkp84hrf5asrJ+JFLTNtLcgaO6eirknUct5TF1hMPaW C6ZSjh8W4zpvmvDst6byoy/jagFcvIKyBZ0QLvfyMOFAA8uW/1QmJudDDKme5Yr0 /YhLHjSHaw/wA8J6DNg7BxGdm6yzjFhkF17dTF7DBP/CS6N9jBYXAr8Qlxx3XF9u U8IjNWaUYk/Ya15m2FRP7jPgVrhG+lN+r7Cax2R9rHoxr+WUJgIvekZs5K/9mIl0 2I0mrnczJGqAk6t/dcma5qe+QNSzQ4neYwS6opXrsyXbnze1g9nNlc97kxiF7j2R T/IpIVexUIXrBFETHunfVjfjDVFWM9ztVFKJfoJaTsu0DwxF8cUPSd8j7FVeMIbV WDjJ5i4RyV+IcLcMjjkQGxkn6JIveb6eanjB22V5GwSCjvC3q5H9jp5/3KehKCYk akjWdj0J/gGmB4F1uu4nXlwvBv+CzFM9ZH8kjbBT6Q== =bU3D -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Bad release in install documentation
Hi, Laura Arjona Reinawrote: > Ok, it seems the jessie installation guide is published correctly and > it's not overwritten with lessoften script. > > I don't know if there should be a stretch installation guide right now, > or only after stretch is published as stable. > The page https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/ seems it has no link > to the installation guide. > The page https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ links to the > stable version of the manual, and to d-i.debian.org/manual > > So I guess this problem is fixed, and everything is ok? (until the next > release?). Or do I need to manually generate the stretch version of the > installmanual, as I did with jessie? Seems fine now! Manual for stable is the correct one, and the one for stretch is not yet published on the website (except the development versions on https://d-i.debian.org/manual/ which correctly document stretch). So this is done for now, many thanks, Laura! Holger -- Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " . Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
Re: Bad release in install documentation
Hi everybody El 15/03/16 a las 23:58, Laura Arjona Reina escribió: [...] > > I've tried to (manually) run the build of the installation manual for > jessie, and I think it went ok. > This is what I did, based on the lessoften script [1]: > > ls -t1 /srv/www.debian.org/cron/ftpfiles/pool/installation-guide_*.dsc > | head -1 > > sudo -u debwww dpkg-source -sn -x > /srv/www.debian.org/cron/ftpfiles/pool/installation-guide_20150423+deb8u > 2.dsc > > cd installation-guide-20150423+deb8u2/build && sudo -u debwww > manual_release=jessie > destination=/srv/www.debian.org/installmanual/jessie/ ./buildweb.sh > > /srv/www.debian.org/installmanual/jessie.log 2>&1 > > sudo -u debwww cp -a /srv/www.debian.org/installmanual/jessie/* > /srv/www.debian.org/www/releases/jessie/ > > Let's see what happens in the next lessoften build. I think stretch > manual is not built yet, but maybe it's build after this is fixed. If > tomorrow after lessoften I see the jessie manual fixed, and the > stretch manual not appearing, I would try to build it manually too. > > [1] > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/1in > stallation-guide > Ok, it seems the jessie installation guide is published correctly and it's not overwritten with lessoften script. I don't know if there should be a stretch installation guide right now, or only after stretch is published as stable. The page https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/ seems it has no link to the installation guide. The page https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ links to the stable version of the manual, and to d-i.debian.org/manual So I guess this problem is fixed, and everything is ok? (until the next release?). Or do I need to manually generate the stretch version of the installmanual, as I did with jessie? Cheers -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Re: Bad release in install documentation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everybody El 08/03/16 a las 12:18, Rhonda D'Vine escribió: > * Laura Arjona Reina[2016-03-07 20:25:12 > CET]: >> El 23/02/16 a las 20:27, Holger Wansing escribió: >>> Holger Wansing wrote: For the time being: Looking at http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/commit/lessoften-par ts/1installation-guide?id=c8148aba41b484964cb7a627c5c954a19f056d38 it seems, we have the same situation again now: The latest upload of installation-guide was for Stretch (Changelog does not mention that explicitly, but there are several changings effecting Stretch), so that script has to be adapted around that: all occurences of 'jessie' have to be changed into 'stretch' and all 'wheezy' be changed into 'jessie'. Am I correct? If yes, could someone commit that, please !!! >>> >>> I have tried to apply this, but I'm lacking proper >>> permissions. >>> >>> Anyone? >> >> I've committed the suggested change. I suppose now the install >> guide for stretch will appear in its place, but I'm not sure if >> this will automatically retrieve the install guide for >> jessie/stable in its place too... >> >> I'll have a look at the log and the install guides in the website >> after the next lessoften build. > > From what I read in the VCS link above I guess it would need > manually fetching the thing and run it manually for jessie again. > Thanks Rhonda for the hint. I've tried to (manually) run the build of the installation manual for jessie, and I think it went ok. This is what I did, based on the lessoften script [1]: ls -t1 /srv/www.debian.org/cron/ftpfiles/pool/installation-guide_*.dsc | head -1 sudo -u debwww dpkg-source -sn -x /srv/www.debian.org/cron/ftpfiles/pool/installation-guide_20150423+deb8u 2.dsc cd installation-guide-20150423+deb8u2/build && sudo -u debwww manual_release=jessie destination=/srv/www.debian.org/installmanual/jessie/ ./buildweb.sh > /srv/www.debian.org/installmanual/jessie.log 2>&1 sudo -u debwww cp -a /srv/www.debian.org/installmanual/jessie/* /srv/www.debian.org/www/releases/jessie/ Let's see what happens in the next lessoften build. I think stretch manual is not built yet, but maybe it's build after this is fixed. If tomorrow after lessoften I see the jessie manual fixed, and the stretch manual not appearing, I would try to build it manually too. [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/1in stallation-guide > In the long run maybe the package version should be compared to > the release information through something like rmadison or similar > (though, rmadison gives stable and not jessie, so at least some > mapping still would be needed somewhere). > I cannot help in this part, I'm afraid. Cheers - -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJW6JOfAAoJEEw4Yb3McGt0I+IL/0Q0H8Kmnl8fmH748jhoEhpi 5lLQBU050xuFHaKhzNE5F0sX64ItwNvtAIvkgFlZs1Bbmwpokbb/+GAfk6FkwYHy pZofqKTmDU7QjWPXpcZk9dqWPeosOuUn/kLDiNvSx/nPnzR9h+KUI9MYaL1DxWPt dQFb1CGae6AEB6kwoMzK3b8UZ6GzmIQaRUzhbGV+tO1ZYpUE6X6tIfLr/1A2jhrK U3I4lNaeE3IGQfabVPi1rdW9pviuPH4akouy2n9cFKgO4wASznRp1fXCyov6npc7 wgF4DPlAv+f9jDkk7sSiidQv9wdFnDgxxVL0fB6eoPEtTPXwk9qwY5RqiNt9AUv/ bw5f5rzRWDRJc4Vwc/O7zgmGhxiOOQWZpqmbbuNjyVoRtPGhghIibuSJ1DVu6xNW jYmAeI1UjxRrq02I7Rg8uFBtRjRj/5GlaQk1KFxdj7CgZd4pNZVGNyao11xhdgcH aopbgyEtU/S2lF+vByp3o3lhhyQD5HWmxh6bwVG/tw== =DppN -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]
Hi, Rhonda D'Vinewrote: > * Holger Wansing [2016-03-07 10:33:15 CET]: > > Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > > > I'm in debwww since some days ago and this is one of the things I wanted > > > to > > > look at, but couldn't put time yet. > > > I hope I can have a look at it in the following days. > > > > > > > That would be fine indeed. > > > > While I think about, if recruting new people to the team wouldn't make > > sense, nevertheless. As said above, debian-www and debian-doc seem not > > very responsive ATM ... > > Personally I wouldn't object to adding you to the team from what I've > seen from you so far. You would need to go through NM process > (non-uploading maybe) for that though because it doesn't make much sense > to add people to debwww on alioth but actually not being able to deploy > the changes in the end. Also adding non DDs to the alioth project would > require an additional level of checking what got added by a non DD of > the group before deploying anything while it is a bit more convenient > (and trust based) so far with respect to expecting that only people are > able to push there who are also able to deploy it directly. Ok, thanks for the answer! Now I have an answer, better than hear nothing. Holger -- Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " . Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]
* Holger Wansing[2016-03-07 10:33:15 CET]: > Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > > I'm in debwww since some days ago and this is one of the things I wanted to > > look at, but couldn't put time yet. > > I hope I can have a look at it in the following days. > > > > That would be fine indeed. > > While I think about, if recruting new people to the team wouldn't make > sense, nevertheless. As said above, debian-www and debian-doc seem not > very responsive ATM ... Personally I wouldn't object to adding you to the team from what I've seen from you so far. You would need to go through NM process (non-uploading maybe) for that though because it doesn't make much sense to add people to debwww on alioth but actually not being able to deploy the changes in the end. Also adding non DDs to the alioth project would require an additional level of checking what got added by a non DD of the group before deploying anything while it is a bit more convenient (and trust based) so far with respect to expecting that only people are able to push there who are also able to deploy it directly. So long, Rhonda -- Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los| Wir sind Helden Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los|
Re: Bad release in install documentation
* Laura Arjona Reina[2016-03-07 20:25:12 CET]: > El 23/02/16 a las 20:27, Holger Wansing escribió: > > Holger Wansing wrote: > >> For the time being: > >> > >> Looking at > >> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/commit/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide?id=c8148aba41b484964cb7a627c5c954a19f056d38 > >> it seems, we have the same situation again now: > >> > >> The latest upload of installation-guide was for Stretch (Changelog does > >> not mention that explicitly, but there are several changings effecting > >> Stretch), so that script has to be adapted around that: > >> > >> all occurences of 'jessie' have to be changed into 'stretch' and > >> all 'wheezy' be changed into 'jessie'. > >> > >> > >> Am I correct? > >> If yes, could someone commit that, please !!! > > > > I have tried to apply this, but I'm lacking proper permissions. > > > > Anyone? > > I've committed the suggested change. > I suppose now the install guide for stretch will appear in its place, > but I'm not sure if this will automatically retrieve the install guide > for jessie/stable in its place too... > > I'll have a look at the log and the install guides in the website after > the next lessoften build. From what I read in the VCS link above I guess it would need manually fetching the thing and run it manually for jessie again. In the long run maybe the package version should be compared to the release information through something like rmadison or similar (though, rmadison gives stable and not jessie, so at least some mapping still would be needed somewhere). Just my thoughts so far, Rhonda -- Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los| Wir sind Helden Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los|
Re: Bad release in install documentation
El 23/02/16 a las 20:27, Holger Wansing escribió: > Hi, > > Holger Wansingwrote: >> Hi, >> >> Cyril Brulebois wrote: >>> Samuel Thibault (2016-02-06): Hello, a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says > about stable release. It's worse than that: it seems it's really the current Stretch installation guide which ended up on the website in stable/, I don't know why. Www people, any idea? >>> >>> Because >>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide >>> >>> It would be nice if it could put stuff targetting s(-p-u) under stable, and >>> stuff targetting unstable under testing, but I didn't reach this point of my >>> todo list yet. >> >> For the time being: >> >> Looking at >> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/commit/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide?id=c8148aba41b484964cb7a627c5c954a19f056d38 >> it seems, we have the same situation again now: >> >> The latest upload of installation-guide was for Stretch (Changelog does >> not mention that explicitly, but there are several changings effecting >> Stretch), so that script has to be adapted around that: >> >> all occurences of 'jessie' have to be changed into 'stretch' and >> all 'wheezy' be changed into 'jessie'. >> >> >> Am I correct? >> If yes, could someone commit that, please !!! > > I have tried to apply this, but I'm lacking proper permissions. > > Anyone? > I've committed the suggested change. I suppose now the install guide for stretch will appear in its place, but I'm not sure if this will automatically retrieve the install guide for jessie/stable in its place too... I'll have a look at the log and the install guides in the website after the next lessoften build. Cheers -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]
Hi, Laura Arjona Reinawrote: > I'm in debwww since some days ago and this is one of the things I wanted to > look at, but couldn't put time yet. > I hope I can have a look at it in the following days. > That would be fine indeed. While I think about, if recruting new people to the team wouldn't make sense, nevertheless. As said above, debian-www and debian-doc seem not very responsive ATM ... Holger -- Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " . Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]
Hi On 6 de marzo de 2016 13:13:45 GMT+01:00, Holger Wansingwrote: >Hi, > >Holger Wansing wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Holger Wansing wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> > > Samuel Thibault (2016-02-06): >> > > > Hello, >> > > > >> > > > a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: >> > > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It >says in >> > > > > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the >url says >> > > > > about stable release. >> > > > >> > > > It's worse than that: it seems it's really the current Stretch >> > > > installation guide which ended up on the website in stable/, I >don't >> > > > know why. Www people, any idea? >> > > >> > > Because >http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide >> > > >> > > It would be nice if it could put stuff targetting s(-p-u) under >stable, and >> > > stuff targetting unstable under testing, but I didn't reach this >point of my >> > > todo list yet. >> > >> > For the time being: >> > >> > Looking at >> > >http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/commit/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide?id=c8148aba41b484964cb7a627c5c954a19f056d38 >> > it seems, we have the same situation again now: >> > >> > The latest upload of installation-guide was for Stretch (Changelog >does >> > not mention that explicitly, but there are several changings >effecting >> > Stretch), so that script has to be adapted around that: >> > >> > all occurences of 'jessie' have to be changed into 'stretch' and >> > all 'wheezy' be changed into 'jessie'. >> > >> > >> > Am I correct? >> > If yes, could someone commit that, please !!! >> >> I have tried to apply this, but I'm lacking proper permissions. >> >> Anyone? > >I have asked for membership in the relevant alioth project "debwww" >~ 10 days ago, but got no answer yet :-(( > >What can be done about this? > >Somebody here, who minds doing the above changing? >(Noone on debian-www objected against this for weeks, so I assume >change >this is the right thing to do, to get the problem solved.) > > >Holger I'm in debwww since some days ago and this is one of the things I wanted to look at, but couldn't put time yet. I hope I can have a look at it in the following days. Thanks Holger, and sorry for the delay! Best regards Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]
Hi, Holger Wansingwrote: > Hi, > > Holger Wansing wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Samuel Thibault (2016-02-06): > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: > > > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in > > > > > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says > > > > > about stable release. > > > > > > > > It's worse than that: it seems it's really the current Stretch > > > > installation guide which ended up on the website in stable/, I don't > > > > know why. Www people, any idea? > > > > > > Because > > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide > > > > > > It would be nice if it could put stuff targetting s(-p-u) under stable, > > > and > > > stuff targetting unstable under testing, but I didn't reach this point of > > > my > > > todo list yet. > > > > For the time being: > > > > Looking at > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/commit/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide?id=c8148aba41b484964cb7a627c5c954a19f056d38 > > it seems, we have the same situation again now: > > > > The latest upload of installation-guide was for Stretch (Changelog does > > not mention that explicitly, but there are several changings effecting > > Stretch), so that script has to be adapted around that: > > > > all occurences of 'jessie' have to be changed into 'stretch' and > > all 'wheezy' be changed into 'jessie'. > > > > > > Am I correct? > > If yes, could someone commit that, please !!! > > I have tried to apply this, but I'm lacking proper permissions. > > Anyone? I have asked for membership in the relevant alioth project "debwww" ~ 10 days ago, but got no answer yet :-(( What can be done about this? Somebody here, who minds doing the above changing? (Noone on debian-www objected against this for weeks, so I assume change this is the right thing to do, to get the problem solved.) Holger -- Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " . Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
Re: Bad release in install documentation
Hi, Holger Wansingwrote: > Hi, > > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Samuel Thibault (2016-02-06): > > > Hello, > > > > > > a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: > > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in > > > > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says > > > > about stable release. > > > > > > It's worse than that: it seems it's really the current Stretch > > > installation guide which ended up on the website in stable/, I don't > > > know why. Www people, any idea? > > > > Because > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide > > > > It would be nice if it could put stuff targetting s(-p-u) under stable, and > > stuff targetting unstable under testing, but I didn't reach this point of my > > todo list yet. > > For the time being: > > Looking at > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/commit/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide?id=c8148aba41b484964cb7a627c5c954a19f056d38 > it seems, we have the same situation again now: > > The latest upload of installation-guide was for Stretch (Changelog does > not mention that explicitly, but there are several changings effecting > Stretch), so that script has to be adapted around that: > > all occurences of 'jessie' have to be changed into 'stretch' and > all 'wheezy' be changed into 'jessie'. > > > Am I correct? > If yes, could someone commit that, please !!! I have tried to apply this, but I'm lacking proper permissions. Anyone? Holger -- Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " . Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
Re: Bad release in install documentation
Hi, Cyril Bruleboiswrote: > Samuel Thibault (2016-02-06): > > Hello, > > > > a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in > > > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says > > > about stable release. > > > > It's worse than that: it seems it's really the current Stretch > > installation guide which ended up on the website in stable/, I don't > > know why. Www people, any idea? > > Because > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide > > It would be nice if it could put stuff targetting s(-p-u) under stable, and > stuff targetting unstable under testing, but I didn't reach this point of my > todo list yet. For the time being: Looking at http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/commit/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide?id=c8148aba41b484964cb7a627c5c954a19f056d38 it seems, we have the same situation again now: The latest upload of installation-guide was for Stretch (Changelog does not mention that explicitly, but there are several changings effecting Stretch), so that script has to be adapted around that: all occurences of 'jessie' have to be changed into 'stretch' and all 'wheezy' be changed into 'jessie'. Am I correct? If yes, could someone commit that, please !!! Holger -- Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " . Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
Re: Bad release in install documentation
Samuel Thibault(2016-02-06): > Hello, > > a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in > > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says > > about stable release. > > It's worse than that: it seems it's really the current Stretch > installation guide which ended up on the website in stable/, I don't > know why. Www people, any idea? Because http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide It would be nice if it could put stuff targetting s(-p-u) under stable, and stuff targetting unstable under testing, but I didn't reach this point of my todo list yet. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bad release in install documentation
Hello, a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says > about stable release. It's worse than that: it seems it's really the current Stretch installation guide which ended up on the website in stable/, I don't know why. Www people, any idea? Samuel