Martin Michlmayr (2016-02-19):
> * Cyril Brulebois [2016-02-19 11:07]:
> > Until now I've been waiting for linux to be built everywhere to flip
> > the switch. I'm fine with revisiting how we do things but I think it
> > should be discussed somehow.
>
> I agree with you (unless there's one arch which takes a long time to
> get fixed).
(of course)
> Sorry, I was a little bit trigger happy yesterday. I thought breaking
> some builds for a day or two wouldn't be a big problem, but I guess
> you're the one receiving all the build errors. ;-)
I have a specific monitoring for kernel bumps and d-i daily build
failures indeed. I almost was trigger-happy as well, but refrained from
doing so when I noticed some FTBFSes; which made it curious to get
notified about d-i daily build failures a few hours after that. ;)
> Anyway, I agree with your policy. Ben made a new linux upload so
> hopefully all architectures will be there later today.
Indeed, all green so far.
I only remember one particular time (without any references whatsoever
because I'm not a memory guy) where we had to wait for a few iterations
since build failures were getting fixed… and other discovered, so it
took a few days, maybe weeks.
Anyway, back to the topic: Great, let's keep current practice. Of
course, it totally makes sense to jump the gun in some cases. What I
initially thought was that arm* folks were interested in recent fixes in
latest linux (this seems usual because well arm*…), and it seemed odd to
bump the version to depend on a linux version… that wasn't built. :)
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
