Bug#405250: marked as done (SPARC32 floppy install - issues switching between floppies)

2011-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:21:14 +
with message-id <1295720474.2505.233.camel@eeepc.Belkin>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #405250,
regarding SPARC32 floppy install - issues switching between floppies
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
405250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405250
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: installation-reports

Boot method:  floppy
Image version:  
http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/images/daily/sparc32/floppy/2.6/boot.img
Date:   20061219

Machine:  Sun SparcStation 5
Processor: 70Mhz
Memory: 80MB
Partitions: 

Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn: none

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [E]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:
There are some oddities when performing a floppy install of the "testing" 
version of Debian:

After
booting the system from floppy, it will not automatically eject the
boot floppy when prompting for the root floppy.  The install process
does later automatically eject the root floppy at the point where it
asks if you have a floppy disk containing drivers needed for the
install.

When you manually switch the boot floppy for the root
floppy, it takes exactly four keypresses of the ENTER key before the
system takes any action with the root floppy.  After hitting the ENTER
key on the QWERTY part of a Sun5c keyboard four times, the system
behaves normally, and you see a message that the system has found the
root image.  This is on a SparcStation 20 w/CG6 framebuffer and Sun5c
keyboard/mouse, as well as a SparcStation 5 (170Mhz) and SparcStation 5
(70Mhz) using the same keyboard and mouse between all three systems.

I've
also seen the same behaviour switching floppys during an install where
I was using a serial console instead of a real monitor/keyboard/mouse. 
It took four ENTERs to get from the boot to the root floppy on an x86
Linux workstation running Minicom in VT102 emulation and ANSI emulation.

At
this point in time, these are the only issues I've seen performing a
successful floppy based install of the SPARC32 version of Debian
"testing" on a Sun SparcStation 20, a Sun SparcStation 5 (170Mhz
processor), and a Sun SparcStation 5 (70Mhz processor).

--Dan


 
 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com --- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Floppies are no longer supported in the installer.
Hence, i am closing this BR.

-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org


--- End Message ---


Bug#405177: marked as done (install-report: no reboot after FLOPPY install)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:23 +
with message-id 
and subject line Closing old installation report #405177
has caused the Debian Bug report #405177,
regarding install-report: no reboot after FLOPPY install
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
405177: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405177
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: installation-reports

Boot method: Floppy
Image version: Downloaded September 2006
Date: 1. January 2007

Machine: Compaq Pressario 701ea
Processor: AMD Duron 950 Mhz
Memory: 192 mb
Partitions: Standart Desktop Partitions ( /, Swap, /home )

Output of lspci and lspci -n: ??

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[First Error in downloading Packages, Than OK!]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [E]

Comments/Problems:

Don't know why it doesn't boot, but I'll try another Kernel ( I tried  
2.6-k7.. )



___ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We are closing this installation report for one of the following
reasons:
- it was reported with a pre-lenny version of Debian
  Installer.
- indications in the installation report give the feeling that
  the reported problem waslying in another software, unrelated to
  D-I, which we can't easily identify.
- indications in the installation report suggest that it may have been
  fixed in a more recent version of a D-I component
- it was successful and we forgot closing it..:-)
- it has no information we consider useful


The D-I team is currently in the process of cleaning out the old spool
of installation reports that haven't bene processed yet. 

In case you think that the problem you reported has chances to be
still present, please reiterate your installation test with
a more recent image of D-I, if you're in position of doing this.

You'll find daily builds at
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer. We recommend you choose
the netboot image, in the "daily builds section", then choose to
install "squeeze" when prompted.

If some problems are found, please report them with a new bug sent
against installation-reports.

Many thanks for your understanding and your help improving Debian,
past and present.


--- End Message ---


Bug#357704: marked as done (Floppy install does not configure boot dir and grub correctly)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Closing old installation report #357704
has caused the Debian Bug report #357704,
regarding Floppy install does not configure boot dir and grub correctly
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
357704: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357704
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

-> 
-> If you don't mind, please don't put my e-mail address on the web.
-> 

Boot method: 
Floppy. 4 x 1.44 mb

Image version: 
17-Mar-2006 from
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/access.

Date: 18-Mar-2006, around 6:00 EST

Machine: Spare parts, mobo about 3-4 years old. Fairly modern. Runs
GNU/Debian well.

Processor: AMD K7

Memory: 1GB

Partitions: 
FilesystemType   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
[#/dev/hda1 ntfs (not mounted)]
[#/dev/hda2 swap]
/dev/hda3 reiserfs16602624   8456792   8145832  51% /
[#/dev/hda4 reiserfs (*** not mounted, but see below)]
tmpfstmpfs  518412 0518412   0% /dev/shm
tmpfstmpfs  518412   100518312   1% /dev


Output of lspci and lspci -n:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]
741/741GX/M741 Host (rev 03)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS AGP Port
(virtual PCI-to-PCI bridge)
:00:02.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS964 [MuTIOL
Media IO] (rev 36)
:00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE]
(rev 01)
:00:03.0 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0
Controller (rev 0f)
:00:03.1 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0
Controller (rev 0f)
:00:03.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0
Controller (rev 0f)
:00:03.3 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 2.0
Controller
:00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]
SiS900 PCI Fast Ethernet (rev 91)
:00:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1
(rev 0a)
:00:0a.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game
Port (rev 0a)
:00:0b.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128
Pro Ultra TR
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280
[Radeon 9200] (rev 01)
:01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon
9200] (Secondary) (rev 01)

:00:00.0 0600: 1039:0741 (rev 03)
:00:01.0 0604: 1039:0003
:00:02.0 0601: 1039:0964 (rev 36)
:00:02.5 0101: 1039:5513 (rev 01)
:00:03.0 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
:00:03.1 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
:00:03.2 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
:00:03.3 0c03: 1039:7002
:00:04.0 0200: 1039:0900 (rev 91)
:00:0a.0 0401: 1102:0002 (rev 0a)
:00:0a.1 0980: 1102:7002 (rev 0a)
:00:0b.0 0300: 1002:5452
:01:00.0 0300: 1002:5961 (rev 01)
:01:00.1 0380: 1002:5941 (rev 01)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O] *** but see below
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[E]
Reboot: [E]

Comments/Problems:


The install went perfectly (but I do miss full-screen ncurses-style
menus).

I booted boot.img in expert mode, mounted root.img, loaded
net-drivers.img for the SiS900, configured static IP, then downloaded
the rest from a mirror without a problem.

I chose Standard System and Desktop/Workstation for software.

However, while the app software was installed to the correct partition
(hda4), the OS was not installed, and grub did not add hda4 as a menu
choice.

Background: I have 1 hardisk, hda, with 4 partitions:
hda1 ntfs for Windows, should I need to do something with that thing.
hda2 linux paging
hda3 reiserfs for my normal GNU/Debian boot device and root (been
working fine with 'testing' for a long time)
hda4 an empty partition on which I was trying to install afresh the
lastest GNU/Debian

Prior to this install, grub would offer hda1 (Windows) and hda3 (2.6.15)
as boot choices from the MBR.

My goal was to keep hda1 and hda3 intact, and try a fresh install on
hda4, with safe fallback to hda3 or even hda1 (ugh!).
After the install, I expected grub to offer hda1, hda3, and also hda4
(t

Bug#303812: marked as done (sarge floppy install report)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:57 +
with message-id 
and subject line Closing old installation report #303812
has caused the Debian Bug report #303812,
regarding sarge floppy install report
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
303812: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=303812
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version:
not recorded. floppy images downloaded March 29 2005

uname -a:
linux 2.4.27-2-686 #1 Thu Jan 20 11:10:41 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux

Date: week of April 4 2005

Method: floppies

Machine: IBM Thinkpad 770x
Processor: 300 MHz pentium II
Memory: 128 Megabytes
Root Device: IDE /dev/hda2
  /dev/hd1 is windows 2000 fat32.
Root Size/partition table: only one linux partion, 15G, plus swap

Output of lspci :

:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge
 (rev 02)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge
 (rev 02)
:00:02.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1251A
:00:02.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1251A
:00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: Cirrus Logic CS 4610/11
 [CrystalClear SoundFusion Audio Accelerator] (rev 01)
:00:07.0 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
:00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Trident Microsystems
 Cyber 9397DVD (rev f3)
:05:00.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c575
Megahertz 10/100 LAN CardBus [Boomerang]


and lspci -n:

:00:00.0 0600: 8086:7190 (rev 02)
:00:01.0 0604: 8086:7191 (rev 02)
:00:02.0 0607: 104c:ac1d
:00:02.1 0607: 104c:ac1d
:00:06.0 0401: 1013:6001 (rev 01)
:00:07.0 0680: 8086:7110 (rev 02)
:00:07.1 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01)
:00:07.2 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01)
:00:07.3 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 02)
:01:00.0 0300: 1023:939a (rev f3)
:05:00.0 0200: 10b7:5057



Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O ]
Configure network HW:   [O ]
Config network: [O ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [O ]
Detect hard drives: [O ]
Partition hard drives:  [O ]
Create file systems:[O ]
Mount partitions:   [O ]
Install base system:[O ]
Install boot loader:[O ]
Reboot: [O ]

Comments/Problems:

I installed using a 3Com pcmcia wired ethernet card. The first
stage install went fine. The reboot went fine except the
network connection failed. ('does not seem to be currently
connected'). I was then offered ppp as an option, but not dhcp.

That is the install floppies found the network but the
installed system did not.

I switched to tty2 and only had to run dhclient to make the connection
succeed. I switched back to tty1 and, after backing out a few
steps, the installation continued and completed OK.

I then deleted the linux partitions and started the floppy install
a second time. The same thing happened. I did it yet again with the
same result.

I think I remember being asked whether the computer would have a
permanent internet connection or not, on the first time through,
but was not asked that on either of the subsequent two installs.
If I _was_ asked that, I don't remember how I answered.

This would be very discouraging for someone of little experience:

('It found the network when I used the floppies. Why doesn't it
find it now?').

Could there be a dhcp offer at the same place where there is a ppp
offer? Or record the method that worked at the first stage and
transmit that to the intalled system?

Charles Kaufman
ch...@uri.edu


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We are closing this installation report for one of the following
reasons:
- it was reported with a pre-lenny version of Debian
  Installer.
- indications in the installation report give the feeling that
  the reported problem waslying in another software, unrelated to
  D-I, which we can't easily identify.
- indications in the installation report suggest that it may have been
  fixed in a more recent version of a D-I component
- it was successful and we forgot closing it..:-)
- it has no information we consider useful


The D-I team is currently in the process of cleaning out th

Bug#272310: marked as done (Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac G3 tower)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:39 +
with message-id 
and subject line Closing old installation report #272310
has caused the Debian Bug report #272310,
regarding Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac G3 tower
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
272310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272310
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: installation-reports


I tried the PowerMac install floppy set from the 18th


   Index of /~luther/d-i/images/2004-09-18/powerpc/floppy-2.4

NameLast modified   Size  Description


 [DIR]  Parent Directory26-Aug-2004 21:35  -
 [   ]  asian-root.img  18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.1M
 [   ]  boot.img18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.4M
 [   ]  cd-drivers.img  18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.4M
 [   ]  net-drivers.img 18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.4M
 [   ]  ofonlyboot.img  18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.4M
 [   ]  root-2.img  18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.4M
 [   ]  root.img18-Sep-2004 01:37   1.2M
   
_



Apache/1.3.26 Server at people.debian.org Port 80



The boot floppy reads OK and calls for the root floppy, which also 
reads OK.
It asks for Language (I gave it English), then the screen started 
blinking.


Switching to the other consoles (opt-F2, -F3, -F4), which are also 
blinking, so it's hard to get any details, it appears that the 
/sbin/debian-installer process is crashing and restarting 
repeatedly.



Enjoy!

Rick



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We are closing this installation report for one of the following
reasons:
- it was reported with a pre-lenny version of Debian
  Installer.
- indications in the installation report give the feeling that
  the reported problem waslying in another software, unrelated to
  D-I, which we can't easily identify.
- indications in the installation report suggest that it may have been
  fixed in a more recent version of a D-I component
- it was successful and we forgot closing it..:-)
- it has no information we consider useful


The D-I team is currently in the process of cleaning out the old spool
of installation reports that haven't bene processed yet. 

In case you think that the problem you reported has chances to be
still present, please reiterate your installation test with
a more recent image of D-I, if you're in position of doing this.

You'll find daily builds at
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer. We recommend you choose
the netboot image, in the "daily builds section", then choose to
install "squeeze" when prompted.

If some problems are found, please report them with a new bug sent
against installation-reports.

Many thanks for your understanding and your help improving Debian,
past and present.


--- End Message ---


Bug#270599: marked as done (Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:37 +
with message-id 
and subject line Closing old installation report #270599
has caused the Debian Bug report #270599,
regarding Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
270599: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=270599
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
 
powerpc boot-floppy 20040906 OldWorld PowerMac

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 

I got the floppy disk images from:

 Index of /~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy-2.4
 
 NameLast modified   Size  Description
   


 Parent Directory26-Aug-2004 21:35  -
 asian-root.img  06-Sep-2004 22:38   1.2M
 boot.img06-Sep-2004 22:38   1.4M
 cd-drivers.img  06-Sep-2004 22:39   1.4M
 net-drivers.img 06-Sep-2004 22:39   1.4M
 ofonlyboot.img  06-Sep-2004 22:39   1.4M
 root-2.img  06-Sep-2004 22:41   1.4M
 root.img06-Sep-2004 22:42   1.3M
   

Apache/1.3.26 Server at people.debian.org Port 80


uname -a: 

Linux debian 2.6.7-powerpc #1 Thu Aug 5 23:48:59 CEST 2004 ppc
GNU/Linux


Date: 

4 AM (UTC) 2004-09-07


Method:
How did you install?

boot/root/driver floppies with an assist from the uchicago mirror

What did you boot off?

boot floppy

If network install, from where?

debian.uchicago.edu

Proxied?

No


Machine: 

PowerMac G3/300 MHz

Processor:

processor   : 0
cpu : 740/750
temperature : 36-41 C (uncalibrated)
clock   : 300MHz
revision: 2.2 (pvr 0008 0202)
bogomips: 601.29
machine : Power Macintosh
motherboard : AAPL,Gossamer MacRISC
detected as : 48 (PowerMac G3 (Gossamer))
pmac flags  : 
L2 cache: 1024K unified pipelined-syncro-burst
memory  : 384MB
pmac-generation : OldWorld



Memory:

384 MB


Root Device: 

Didn't get that far

Root Size/partition table:  Feel free to paste the full partition
  table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.



Output of lspci and lspci -n:

:00:00.0 Host bridge: Motorola MPC106 [Grackle] (rev 40)
:00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc RTL8139 Ethernet
(rev 10)
:00:0e.0 SCSI storage controller: Artop Electronic Corp ATP865
(rev 06)
:00:0f.0 PCI bridge: Hint Corp HB6 Universal PCI-PCI bridge
(non-transparent mode) (rev 13)
:00:10.0 ff00: Apple Computer Inc. Heathrow Mac I/O (rev 01)
:00:12.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage
I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (rev 9a)
:01:08.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
:01:08.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
:01:08.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 02)
:01:0b.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB12LV26
IEEE-1394 Controller (Link)

:00:00.0 0600: 1057:0002 (rev 40)
:00:0d.0 0200: 1186:1300 (rev 10)
:00:0e.0 0100: 1191:0009 (rev 06)
:00:0f.0 0604: 3388:0021 (rev 13)
:00:10.0 ff00: 106b:0010 (rev 01)
:00:12.0 0300: 1002:4754 (rev 9a)
:01:08.0 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 41)
:01:08.1 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 41)
:01:08.2 0c03: 1033:00e0 (rev 02)
:01:0b.0 0c00: 104c:8020



Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[?] Note 1 
Configure network HW:   [o]
Config network: [o]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [o]
Detect hard drives: [e] Note 2
Partition hard drives:  [?]
Create file systems:[ ]
Mount partitions:   [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]

Comments/Problems:



Note 1:

The "ofonlyboot" floppy booted and gave me the "tuxmac" icon in the
middle of the screen.  After the floppy noises stopped, the screen
inverted colors, but did not switch to text mode.  The ofonly boot
floppy ejected.  Normally, at this point it's calling for the root
floppy, so I gave it the root floppy and hit .  As expected,
it read the root floppy, but the text screen never appeared -- just
the inverted 

Bug#380585: marked as done (d-i: floppy install fails for USB keyboards)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue,  7 Sep 2010 20:39:53 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <20100907183953.8fb1623b8...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Closing old installation reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #380585,
regarding d-i: floppy install fails for USB keyboards
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
380585: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380585
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

package: debian install FD
version: 3.1 


I can not complete install from FD.
I'm using USB keybord. 
After initrd.gz is read, Insmod error "hid.o" is displayed.

Ten USB keyboard halts.
Tere is not "hid.o" in "initrd.gz" in boot FD.

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

愛媛新聞エリアサービス北条東
清水宏之
as_ho...@hotmail.com

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We are closing this installation report for one of the following
reasons:
- it was reported with a pre-lenny version of Debian
  Installer.
- indications in the installation report give the feeling that
  the reported problem waslying in another software, unrelated to
  D-I, which we can't easily identify.
- indications in the installation report suggest that it may have been
  fixed in a more recent version of a D-I component
- it was successful and we forgot closing it..:-)
- it has no information we consider useful


The D-I team is currently in the process of cleaning out the old spool
of installation reports that haven't bene processed yet. 

In case you think that the problem you reported has chances to be
still present, please reiterate your installation test with
a more recent image of D-I, if you're in position of doing this.

You'll find daily builds at
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer. We recommend you choose
the netboot image, in the "daily builds section", then choose to
install "squeeze" when prompted.

If some problems are found, please report them with a new bug sent
against installation-reports.

Many thanks for your understanding and your help improving Debian,
past and present.


--- End Message ---


RFR: documentation about floppy install (Was: Re: floppy install)

2010-08-05 Thread Holger Wansing
Hello all,

Philip Hands  wrote:
> James, if you try that, perhaps you could write-up any issues you bump
> into, so that we could still offer a floppy install method, even if we
> no longer try to cram the latest installer onto a floppy.

I'm thinking of an addition to the d-i manual to document such installation
(etch release) via floppy followed by dist-upgrades to actual stable release.

I want to request a rough review of the attached patch, which is only 
a first proposal, with several unclear paragraphs (marked with FIXME),
that I need to check further.

My intention of this mail: 
is there some interest to include something like this into the d-i manual?

Frans?

If not, I wouldn't waste any more time on this.



Holger

-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


Index: w-c/build/entities/urls.ent
===
--- w-c/build/entities/urls.ent	(Revision 64161)
+++ w-c/build/entities/urls.ent	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -319,6 +319,12 @@
 http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/index.shtml";>
 
+http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-i386/current/images/floppy";>
+
+http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/4.0_r9/i386/iso-cd/";>
+
 
+
+
+ 
+ Installing from floppy disc
+
+
+
+Although installing &debian; &release; from floppy is not directly
+supported (since the kernel and initrd don't fit on a floppy disc
+anymore), we want to show a way to install &debian; &release; on machines,
+that can only boot from floppy anyway.
+
+
+
+Requirement for this is at least a system, that can boot from floppy
+disc and a way to provide an installation cdrom image. One possibility
+for the latter is a cdrom drive, internal or external via usb for example,
+another one is an usb mass storage device FIXME.
+Via this way a pure base Etch system will be installed. No additional
+packages are to be installed at this step, this can be done later in
+the process. In this later step you will also need an internet connection.
+
+
+
+So, download the images: you need boot.img,
+root.img and cd-drivers.img
+from  and
+debian-40r9-i386-netinst.iso from
+.
+Write the floppy images to floppies as described in section FIXME.
+The netinst.iso cdrom image needs to be burned to a cdrom, if you
+want to use a cdrom drive for that image, or you have to store it on
+an usb stick or the like FIXME.
+
+
+
+  
+  Installing the Etch base system
+
+
+
+Boot your system from floppy now, choose the default install option (or
+use expert if you want full control about the process) and insert the root
+disc when the system asks for it. Then go through the steps as usual
+(you can get more info about the normal installation process in
+).
+When asked for a driver floppy FIXME, insert the cd-driver floppy.
+If you have burned the netinst.iso image to a cdrom, put it into the drive
+and the system will detect the image automatically.
+If you wrote the image to an usb mass storage device, plug it in and mount
+the partition manually via virtual console (Alt
+F2) FIXME.
+You will reach the step to load additional installer components from the
+cdrom (image). Choose that ones from which you think you will need them.
+
+
+
+From here on you can follow the normal installation procedure as described
+in . When you come to the step for selecting
+additional software to be installed, you should mark "Standard system"
+FIXME for installation, nothing else.
+
+
+
+   
+   Upgrading to lenny
+
+
+
+Now that you have completed the installation of Debian Etch, you will have
+to prepare your system to get upgraded to Lenny via internet. At this time it
+is not supported to use a dialup connection via normal phone line,
+ISDN, DSL or the like. The supported way is to use an ethernet connection and
+let another pc or your internet router care about connecting to the internet.
+For this, a network connection has to be configured: we will assume, that you
+have a working network interface on your system, let's say /dev/eth0 FIXME.
+Maybe your network interface is already correctly configured, in this case
+you can skip the next paragraph and go directly to editing /etc/apt/sources.list.
+
+
+
+Otherwise you will have to edit some configuration files for your network settings
+now: the first one is /etc/network/interfaces. If you want to use DHCP to get your
+network settings allocated from a server (i.e. from your internet router), add the
+following lines to /etc/network/interfaces (substitute
+eth0 with the notation of your interface, if yours is
+not eth0):
+
+
+auto eth0
+iface eth0 inet dhcp
+
+
+If you want to use static network settings, use this lines (edit the lines

Re: floppy install - unable to find root filesystem, ide_generic not loaded

2010-07-24 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi,

Holger Wansing  wrote:
> Philip Hands  wrote:
> > Do you happen to know the name of the module that was providing ide
> > support before the kernel upgrade was?
> 
> Don't know, but I will start the whole floppy installation again, then I
> will see.

I have installed the system from scatch.
A pure 4.0 aka etch system is now running on that machine.
The only ide related modules are actually:
ide_core
ide_generic
ide_disc


Holger

-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100724231738.dd3f0f11.li...@wansing-online.de



Re: floppy install - unable to find root filesystem, ide_generic not loaded

2010-07-23 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi,

Philip Hands  wrote:
> Do you happen to know the name of the module that was providing ide
> support before the kernel upgrade was?

Don't know, but I will start the whole floppy installation again, then I
will see.

> saying that it's no longer directly supported, but you can do it by
> following the instructions in e.g. Appendix X: Floppy Installs
> if you think that's an appropriate place.
> 
> You can submit what you write as a bug/patch against the package
> installation-guide

Yes, I planned to add an additional appendix to the installation guide.
But I will ask Frans Pop for his opinion, before I start the work, as he
is somewhat responsible for the manual IIRC.


Holger

-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100723223740.021eae49.li...@wansing-online.de



Re: floppy install - unable to find root filesystem, ide_generic not loaded

2010-07-22 Thread Philip Hands
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:17:56 +0200, Holger Wansing  
wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Philip Hands  wrote:
> > It seems like the initramfs hasn't picked up on the fact that that
> > module is needed.  This should be fixable by doing:
> > 
> >   echo ide_generic >> /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
> >   update-initramfs
> > 
> > You may find that once booted with the module loaded, update-initramfs
> > can work out that that module is needed, and that it doesn't need to be
> > explicitly listed in the /etc/initramfs-tools/modules file, but the
> > problem presumably comes from the fact that ide_generic was not needed
> > in the earlier kernel, or that it was loading a specific chipset's
> > module in the etch kernel, and that module's name has changed rendering
> > it unavailable for the new kernel.
> 
> Yes, I have fixed the system that way, but my real intention was,
> to avoid that this problem occures again in the future.
> Thus asking what package is responsible for this.

Since that fix works, it seems to me that the fault lies somewhere in
the linux-image or initramfs-tools packages -- one or other of them
should realise that if we're currently relying on ide_oldname, that
means that we need to ensure that either ide_generic or ide_newname get
added to the list of modules that get built into the new kernel's
initrd.

Do you happen to know the name of the module that was providing ide
support before the kernel upgrade was?

> But maybe this is not really important for the docu I want to write for
> that floppy installation process.

It really ought to be covered here:

  
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#boot-hangs

but I get the impression that your problem is not helped by these
suggestions, so perhaps you should write a subsection that would have
helped, and submit it as a bug report against the manual -- see:

  
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-about.en.html#bug-reports

Once that's fixed, you'd be able to refer to that manual in your floppy
install notes.

Actually, if you're writing a floppy install section, it's probably best
to submit it as a bug against the install guide, so that it gets
incorporated permanently.  There should at least be a reference to it
in this bit:

  http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s04.html.en

and perhaps here:

  http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apas02.html.en

saying that it's no longer directly supported, but you can do it by
following the instructions in e.g. Appendix X: Floppy Installs
if you think that's an appropriate place.

You can submit what you write as a bug/patch against the package
installation-guide

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]http://www.hands.com/
|-|  HANDS.COM Ltd.http://www.uk.debian.org/
|(|  10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London  E18 1NE  ENGLAND


pgpT6KRsp3OEJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: floppy install - unable to find root filesystem, ide_generic not loaded

2010-07-22 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi,

Philip Hands  wrote:
> It seems like the initramfs hasn't picked up on the fact that that
> module is needed.  This should be fixable by doing:
> 
>   echo ide_generic >> /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
>   update-initramfs
> 
> You may find that once booted with the module loaded, update-initramfs
> can work out that that module is needed, and that it doesn't need to be
> explicitly listed in the /etc/initramfs-tools/modules file, but the
> problem presumably comes from the fact that ide_generic was not needed
> in the earlier kernel, or that it was loading a specific chipset's
> module in the etch kernel, and that module's name has changed rendering
> it unavailable for the new kernel.

Yes, I have fixed the system that way, but my real intention was,
to avoid that this problem occures again in the future.
Thus asking what package is responsible for this.

But maybe this is not really important for the docu I want to write for
that floppy installation process.



Thanks
Holger

-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100722201756.c98ba2b6.li...@wansing-online.de



Re: floppy install - unable to find root filesystem, ide_generic not loaded

2010-07-22 Thread Philip Hands
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:28:50 +0200, Holger Wansing  
wrote:
...
> Doing "modprobe ide_generic" makes the harddisk available, and
> closing the shell with exit let's the system boot continue fine.
> 
> Can anyone tell me, why this happens?
> Should I file a bugreport? Against which package?

Hi,

It seems like the initramfs hasn't picked up on the fact that that
module is needed.  This should be fixable by doing:

  echo ide_generic >> /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
  update-initramfs

You may find that once booted with the module loaded, update-initramfs
can work out that that module is needed, and that it doesn't need to be
explicitly listed in the /etc/initramfs-tools/modules file, but the
problem presumably comes from the fact that ide_generic was not needed
in the earlier kernel, or that it was loading a specific chipset's
module in the etch kernel, and that module's name has changed rendering
it unavailable for the new kernel.

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]http://www.hands.com/
|-|  HANDS.COM Ltd.http://www.uk.debian.org/
|(|  10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London  E18 1NE  ENGLAND


pgpah8uTp9ptM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: floppy install - unable to find root filesystem, ide_generic not loaded

2010-07-17 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi,

Philip Hands  wrote:.
> > BTW, is there any reason why not install Etch from floppy instead of
> > Sarge?
> 
> No, none -- I thought I'd checked that.  Actually, I think what actually
> happened is that I found the sarge link first, checked for etch, found
> it and then must have pasted the wrong one into the email -- Doh!
> 
> Sorry for any wasted time.  Installing from Etch floppies would be much
> more sensible.

So, I made a new try with installing Etch and then upgrading to Lenny.

The first step, installing Etch worked fine, booting from Etch floppies
and the installing from a Etch netinst cd.

Then I upgraded to Lenny, according to the Lenny release notes in
three steps:
apt-get install apt aptitude
aptitude safe-upgrade
aptitude dist-upgrade

No problems so far, upgrade completed without errrors or
any glitches, but the new kernel was unable to boot
(more exactly spoken: cannot find the root filesystem).
It's an 2.6.26 kernel from debian linux image package
(linux-image-2.6.26-486).
System boot hangs at "Waiting for root filesystem ..." and
then the debug shell comes up.
The problem is: there are no ide related modules loaded, only
some ACPI modules are loaded.
Doing "modprobe ide_generic" makes the harddisk available, and
closing the shell with exit let's the system boot continue fine.

Can anyone tell me, why this happens?
Should I file a bugreport? Against which package?

Holger


-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100717142850.5b6ed249.li...@wansing-online.de



Re: floppy install

2010-07-12 Thread Philip Hands
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:09:14 +0200, Holger Wansing  
wrote:
> Hi,
...
> BTW, is there any reason why not install Etch from floppy instead of
> Sarge?

No, none -- I thought I'd checked that.  Actually, I think what actually
happened is that I found the sarge link first, checked for etch, found
it and then must have pasted the wrong one into the email -- Doh!

Sorry for any wasted time.  Installing from Etch floppies would be much
more sensible.

> http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-i386/current/images/floppy/

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]http://www.hands.com/
|-|  HANDS.COM Ltd.http://www.uk.debian.org/
|(|  10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London  E18 1NE  ENGLAND


pgpkbysDntqEO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: floppy install

2010-07-11 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi,

Philip Hands  wrote:
> One could of course install Sarge, using images from here:
> 
>   
> http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/current/images/floppy/
> 
> and then edit /etc/apt/source.list and apt-get update ; apt-get
> dist-upgrade.
> 
> A minimal Sarge install should be quick, and the upgrade should be
> trivial, after which running tasksel should get one to the same place
> as a normal install.

BTW, is there any reason why not install Etch from floppy instead of
Sarge?
There are floppy images available for Etch:

http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-i386/current/images/floppy/

That would result in only one upgrade step (etch -> lenny) instead of
two (sarge -> etch -> lenny).


Holger


-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100711220914.cf537a5b.li...@wansing-online.de



Re: floppy install

2010-07-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Holger,

On Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2010, Holger Wansing wrote:
> I could perhaps use one of the force options in dpkg, or something like
> that, but I wanted to ask for the "correct debian way" for such situations,
> as this all would maybe lead to a "semi-official floppy installation
> howto".

The correct debian way to upgrade is not to skip an upgrade, like you tried. 
It might work fine or it might need workarounds, but it's not the recommended 
way.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: floppy install

2010-07-08 Thread Holger Wansing
Hello,

Philip Hands  wrote:
> Is it worth mentioning this for future people hunting for floppy
> installs?
> 
> James, if you try that, perhaps you could write-up any issues you bump
> into, so that we could still offer a floppy install method, even if we
> no longer try to cram the latest installer onto a floppy.

I'm on the way doing such test installation the explained way, in order
to provide a install documentation later.

I have installed a sarge base system via floppy and netinst cd,
everything fine so far.
Now I tried to upgrade to lenny (yes, I know the recommended way
would be to upgrade to etch first, and then to lenny in a second
step, but it would be nice, if it works with on step, or what do you think?)
Now I have a problem and want to ask for assistance:

the upgrade fails due to the packages passwd and debianutils
(passwd 1:4.0.3-31sarge9 and debianutils 2.8.4).
The binary "/usr/sbin/add-shell" is in the package 'passwd' in sarge,
while in lenny, the binary is in the package 'debianutils',
it was moved from one package to the other.
So, the upgrade stops with the error message (only wrote from mind) 
"debianutils: trying to overwrite add-shell, which is already in
package passwd".

I could perhaps use one of the force options in dpkg, or something like
that, but I wanted to ask for the "correct debian way" for such situations,
as this all would maybe lead to a "semi-official floppy installation howto".



Thanks
Holger


-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100708221259.d86ba446.li...@wansing-online.de



Re: floppy install

2010-07-08 Thread Philip Hands
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 22:12:59 +0200, Holger Wansing  
wrote:
...
> So, the upgrade stops with the error message (only wrote from mind) 
> "debianutils: trying to overwrite add-shell, which is already in
> package passwd".

Does upgrading passwd first, with something like:

  apt-get install passwd

get you over this bump?

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]http://www.hands.com/
|-|  HANDS.COM Ltd.http://www.uk.debian.org/
|(|  10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London  E18 1NE  ENGLAND


pgp7YHNmaIFWo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: floppy install

2010-07-01 Thread Philip Hands
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:32:15 +0200, Christian PERRIER  
wrote:
> Quoting James (ja...@onyx.nurealm.net):
> 
> > So, where are these floppy install images?  Or do they exist?  Or is the
> > documentation just wrong?
> 
> 
> There are no more floppy install disks as things no longer fit on them
> for quite a while now. Sorry for this.

One could of course install Sarge, using images from here:

  
http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/current/images/floppy/

and then edit /etc/apt/source.list and apt-get update ; apt-get
dist-upgrade.

A minimal Sarge install should be quick, and the upgrade should be
trivial, after which running tasksel should get one to the same place
as a normal install.

Is it worth mentioning this for future people hunting for floppy
installs?

James, if you try that, perhaps you could write-up any issues you bump
into, so that we could still offer a floppy install method, even if we
no longer try to cram the latest installer onto a floppy.

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]http://www.hands.com/
|-|  HANDS.COM Ltd.http://www.uk.debian.org/
|(|  10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London  E18 1NE  ENGLAND


pgp71ukTM3Jpp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: floppy install

2010-06-25 Thread Holger Wansing
Hello,

Alexander Reichle-Schmehl  wrote:
> -You can download a couple of image files the size of a floppy disk
> -or another removable media of similar small size, write them to the media,
> +You can download a couple of image files the size of a
> +removable media of similar small size, write them to the media,
>  and then start the installation by booting from that.

That sentence seems to be hard to understand for me (both the old and
the new version).
I am not a native english speaker, but I could not find out, what
that should mean.
And: the "similar" has lost its reference: It was" floppys and similar 
media", now it is "similar media". Similar to what?


I would propose:
You can download a couple of image files that should fit on removable
media of small size, write them to ... 



Greetings
Holger


-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100625140914.57e44688.li...@wansing-online.de



Re: floppy install

2010-06-25 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi!

Am 25.06.2010 06:32, schrieb Christian PERRIER:

> There are no more floppy install disks as things no longer fit on them
> for quite a while now. Sorry for this.
> 
> Documentation that still points them should be updated.

I just applied the following:

-Tiny CDs, floppy disks, USB sticks,
etc
+Tiny CDs, USB sticks, etc

-You can download a couple of image files the size of a floppy disk
-or another removable media of similar small size, write them to the media,
+You can download a couple of image files the size of a
+removable media of similar small size, write them to the media,
 and then start the installation by booting from that.


Best regards,
  Alexander


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c2473c2.6070...@schmehl.info



Re: floppy install

2010-06-24 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting James (ja...@onyx.nurealm.net):

> So, where are these floppy install images?  Or do they exist?  Or is the
> documentation just wrong?


There are no more floppy install disks as things no longer fit on them
for quite a while now. Sorry for this.

Documentation that still points them should be updated.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


floppy install

2010-06-24 Thread James
Hey

Looking at this page

 http://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst

there is prominantly referenced

 Tiny CDs, floppy disks, USB sticks, etc

with, in my case, particular interest in the phrase "floppy disks", then
which, if, for instance, the i386 link is followed

 http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-i386/current/images/

and reading the manifest

 
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-i386/current/images/MANIFEST

there seems to, in fact, be no such thing as a "floppy disk" size set of
vmlinuz and initrd.img.


So, where are these floppy install images?  Or do they exist?  Or is the
documentation just wrong?


Thanks

James


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100625013218.bd80584...@onyx.nurealm.net



Processed: installation report: #480935: floppy install 20080227 not working - REASSIGN

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 480935 syslinux
Bug#480935: installationreport: floppy install 20080227 not working
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `syslinux'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#480935: installationreport: floppy install 20080227 not working

2008-05-12 Thread Holger Wansing
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: 
Image version: 
< http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/
installer-i386/current/images/ > 

Date: <11.05.2008 12:00>

Machine: 
Processor: several (486 + Pentium II + Pentium)
Memory: different (from 32MB to 192MB)


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

Tried the floppy install on three different machines, with
similar results:
booting from "boot" floppy
-> initial boot screen - Pressed ENTER
-> "Loading linux .."
-> "Loading initrd "
-> "ready"
-> [Then cursor flashing in the next line, and hang for ever]
   and:
   [Sometimes I got a kernel panic:
   Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
   unknown-block(9,0)]


Tried also with params like "acpi=off" or "noapic" or "nolapic"
or "BOOT_DEBUG=3": no success, no additional infos.


 
Kind regards
Holger





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#441446: Swap partition problem with low memory "expert" floppy install

2007-10-02 Thread Chris Bell
On Tue 02 Oct, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 09:05:36PM +, Chris Bell wrote:
> >I then attempted to install a second system on hdb plus hdc, with swap
> > plus a single RAID 1 partition on each disc. I tried several times with
> > similar parameters, and each time the swap partition on every one of the
> > three discs was displayed by Partman but the error message later said that
> > there was no swap available and the installation failed.
> 
> Was the message one which follows?
> 
>   No swap partition found; userspace software suspend will not work
> 
>   Currently userspace software suspend can write only to a swap
>   partition.  Your system doesn't seem to have such a partition. Please
>   make one, preferably with twice the size of your physical ram. Then
>   run dpkg-reconfigure or setup the configuration file yourself.
> 
> 
> In this case, you have been bitten by #427104 [1], which is a bug in the
> uswsusp package.  This bug is going to be fixed in the next Etch point
> release.
> 
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=427104
> 
> Cheers,

   Yes that was part of the problem, but I also failed to install Etch in
"expert" mode starting from both the most recent set of floppies and from
CD, both in low memory mode (64M RAM) and with 128M RAM, the point of
failure always being somewhere around setting up the printing system, just
before the first re-boot, although I did manage to get past the re-boot, but
it failed to complete the boot.
   A simple auto installation (just started by pressing return) just worked.
   I have installed many debian systems, but this was my first series of
attempts to install 4.0r1 and I still do not understand what was causing the
failures. I used both uk.debian.org direct, and a local apt-cacher as proxy,
as well as a CD built using jigdo, burned and verified immediately before
use, with a brand new DVD drive.
   I wanted to test what would happen if I physically moved one of a RAID1
pair between IDE cables, starting with one connected as primary slave and
the other as secondary master, ending with both connected via the secondary
cable.
   I first tried to install a simple system on the first of three identical
drives (primary IDE master) in expert mode, and after repeated failures
installed the basic system in auto mode, which just worked. The swap
partition was visible to other later installations, but in every case I
created a swap partition on every drive.
   I then tried to install a simple basic system (base system plus desktop)
on the second and third drives, with single LVM on RAID1. After several
failures I tried just / on RAID1, but this also failed.
   I then spent some time trying to figure out why a simple installation in
expert mode gave repeated failures, but did not achieve any repeatable
conclusion.
   The most likely cause that I could find was that some files had been
upgraded or replaced during security updates, and the installer was
downloading files which did not match the specifications.

-- 
Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house.
Chris Bell





Bug#441446: Swap partition problem with low memory "expert" floppy install

2007-10-02 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 09:05:36PM +, Chris Bell wrote:
>I then attempted to install a second system on hdb plus hdc, with swap
> plus a single RAID 1 partition on each disc. I tried several times with
> similar parameters, and each time the swap partition on every one of the
> three discs was displayed by Partman but the error message later said that
> there was no swap available and the installation failed.

Was the message one which follows?

  No swap partition found; userspace software suspend will not work

  Currently userspace software suspend can write only to a swap
  partition.  Your system doesn't seem to have such a partition. Please
  make one, preferably with twice the size of your physical ram. Then
  run dpkg-reconfigure or setup the configuration file yourself.


In this case, you have been bitten by #427104 [1], which is a bug in the
uswsusp package.  This bug is going to be fixed in the next Etch point
release.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=427104

Cheers,
-- 
Jérémy Bobbio.''`. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'` 
  `-   


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#299564: marked as done (Floppy install needs ide-drivers disk to allow early swap mount on lowmem installs)

2007-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:39:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Shipping Clerk - flexible time work-at-home opening
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version:   14 Mar 2005
uname -a:   Linux bob 2.4.27-2-586tsc #1 Thu Jan 20 
10:47:31 JST 2005
i586 GNU/Linux
Date:   14 Mar 2005 11:00
Method: Installed HDD into laptop, installed from 1.44M 
floppy images
then installed via PCMCIA network through debian.goldweb.com.au/debian,
not proxied. After initial install complete moved HDD into target laptop
as target laptop didn't have enough ram for the installer (only 16M).

Machine:IBM Thinkpad 380XD
Processor:  Intel Pentium 200Mhz MMX
Memory: 64MB
Root Device:IDE
Root Size/partition table:
hda1 = swap 256MB
hda2 = linux3.8GB
Output of lspci and lspci -n:

:00:00.0 Host bridge: OPTi Inc. 82C557 [Viper-M] (rev 14)
:00:01.0 ISA bridge: OPTi Inc. 82C558 [Viper-M ISA+IDE] (rev 02)
:00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Cirrus Logic GD 7548
:00:14.0 IDE interface: OPTi Inc. 82C621 [Viper-M/N+] (rev 12)

:00:00.0 0600: 1045:c557 (rev 14)
:00:01.0 0601: 1045:c558 (rev 02)
:00:02.0 0300: 1013:0038
:00:14.0 0101: 1045:c621 (rev 12)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [E]
Was not using CD but installer forced detection
Load installer modules: [E]
IDE driver is on FDD marked as cd-drivers.img
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]

Comments/Problems:

The IDE drivers are on the fdd image marked as cd-drivers, this disk
should be marked as ide-drivers or somthing more generic. Once loaded
drivers from cd-drivers for the IDE the installer still expects to find
a debian CD, this should be optional, I had to force the installer to
continue without the CD.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---


  Our company is looking for energetic and accountable individuals to occupy
  Shipping Clerk positions throughout the USA. These vacancies are entirely
  home-based  and do not require any travel or relocation. They are also
  suitable for students and senior citizens who are able to dedicate up to
  three business hours per day to their duties. No special qualifications are
  required, although previous shipping or customer service experience is a
  plus.  We  are  an international company providing mail/internet order
  opportunities for a global clientele since 1997. We are based in Russia, and
  also  have  offices  in  Latvia  and Kazakhstan. Our business provides
  online/Online Order facilities for those who are unable to benefit from the
  convenience of e-commerce due to lack of a banking relationship with an
  internationally recognized bank or because major online vendors will not
  ship to their location. We have domestic purchasing agents who place the
  orders on behalf of our clients, and the goods are then shipped to the local
  shipping clerks for further sorting and international shipment. We also
  provide escrow services for high amount and/or web auction orders, and offer
  assistance with customs clearance, if required. Currently, we are looking
  for individuals to fill in the positions of shipping clerks throughout the
  USA. Your duties will include receiving, sorting, repackaging and re-sending
  the orders made on behalf of our clients using the pre-paid USPS shipping
  labels that you will receive via email. You will be paid $20 for each parcel
  that you ship, plus $5 for each order that you will need to re-sort or
  re-package. We will also cover any other authorized expense, such as extra
  insurance or shipping materials. Your remuneration will be remitted to you
  via Western Union twice a month. You can expect to handle 5-15 incoming
  packages weekly, following a 2 week probation period. You can perform your
  duties from the convenience of your home. You will generally be re-shipping
  the orders on same day or next day basis, so you will

Re: USB-floppy install problem

2007-06-11 Thread peter green

peter green wrote:

Greg Flynn wrote:

Frans Pop wrote:

On Monday 11 June 2007 02:51, Greg Flynn wrote:
 

I'm trying to install debian 4.0r0 via the floppy images.  The laptop
is a Averatec 3200 series laptop with AMD Athlon XP-m 2000+, 256MB 
RAM,

a dead DVD-ROM/CD-RW (will not work at all), Via chipset(not sure
exactly which) and Via-rhine II ethernet.  The floppy drive i'm trying
to install from is an external USB floppy.



Because of the size of the kernel, installing from a USB floppy 
drive is not supported for Etch (the USB driver modules just do not 
fit on the boot floppy anymore).


If you have no alternatives, we suggest you try installing Sarge 
instead and upgrade afterwards.


Note that installing Sarge is not really straightforward at the 
moment. The problem is that the installer does not really support 
installing
"oldstable'. As far as we know, it should be possible to work around 
any problems. We are working to improve that with the next point 
release for Sarge.


Cheers,
FJP
  
I tried sarge back in the day and it has the same issue with the usb, 
after the boot floppy, it won't be able to find any other one



I have had recent reports of a sucessfull sarge install with a usb 
floppy drive. The suite switch issues were avoided by using an 
appropriate date from snapshot.debian.net as the source (i wouldn't 
rely on that method though given thier habit of losing stuff).  There 
WERE a load of io errors trying to find the root floppy but it found 
it eventually. The net drivers floppy was also a pain to get in 
(required waiting for a timeout and manualy selecting a device that 
was marked as scsi).


Sometime when i'm less busy with other stuff i intend to contact the 
isolinux guys about the possibility of reading in more than one floppy 
before booting linux and seeing if i can make a set of floppies that 
boot D-I that way.
btw on a related note will the current plans for fixing up the sarge 
installer also allow for installing it after it is moved to archive?




sorry that should have been syslinux not isolinux and i got the list 
address wrong



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: USB-floppy install problem

2007-06-11 Thread Greg Flynn

Frans Pop wrote:

On Monday 11 June 2007 02:51, Greg Flynn wrote:
  

I'm trying to install debian 4.0r0 via the floppy images.  The laptop
is a Averatec 3200 series laptop with AMD Athlon XP-m 2000+, 256MB RAM,
a dead DVD-ROM/CD-RW (will not work at all), Via chipset(not sure
exactly which) and Via-rhine II ethernet.  The floppy drive i'm trying
to install from is an external USB floppy.



Because of the size of the kernel, installing from a USB floppy drive is 
not supported for Etch (the USB driver modules just do not fit on the 
boot floppy anymore).


If you have no alternatives, we suggest you try installing Sarge instead 
and upgrade afterwards.


Note that installing Sarge is not really straightforward at the moment. 
The problem is that the installer does not really support installing
"oldstable'. As far as we know, it should be possible to work around any 
problems. We are working to improve that with the next point release for 
Sarge.


Cheers,
FJP
  
I tried sarge back in the day and it has the same issue with the usb, 
after the boot floppy, it won't be able to find any other one



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: USB-floppy install problem

2007-06-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 11 June 2007 02:51, Greg Flynn wrote:
> I'm trying to install debian 4.0r0 via the floppy images.  The laptop
> is a Averatec 3200 series laptop with AMD Athlon XP-m 2000+, 256MB RAM,
> a dead DVD-ROM/CD-RW (will not work at all), Via chipset(not sure
> exactly which) and Via-rhine II ethernet.  The floppy drive i'm trying
> to install from is an external USB floppy.

Because of the size of the kernel, installing from a USB floppy drive is 
not supported for Etch (the USB driver modules just do not fit on the 
boot floppy anymore).

If you have no alternatives, we suggest you try installing Sarge instead 
and upgrade afterwards.

Note that installing Sarge is not really straightforward at the moment. 
The problem is that the installer does not really support installing
"oldstable'. As far as we know, it should be possible to work around any 
problems. We are working to improve that with the next point release for 
Sarge.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpQM2atCriZZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


USB-floppy install problem

2007-06-10 Thread Greg Flynn
I'm trying to install debian 4.0r0 via the floppy images.  The laptop is 
a Averatec 3200 series laptop with AMD Athlon XP-m 2000+, 256MB RAM, a 
dead DVD-ROM/CD-RW (will not work at all), Via chipset(not sure exactly 
which) and Via-rhine II ethernet.  The floppy drive i'm trying to 
install from is an external USB floppy.


my BIOS boot the floppy fine to the Debian boot floppy, but after it 
starts trying to load the kernel, i hit the error:


floppy0: no floppy controllers found
cannot load floppy

and then it just hangs after that.  I have installed debian before on 
this laptop when the CD drive has seen better days and never had the USB 
working initially after an install.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#405250: SPARC32 floppy install - issues switching between floppies

2007-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 405250 rootskel-bootfloppy
Bug#405250: SPARC32 floppy install - issues switching between floppies
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `rootskel-bootfloppy'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#405250: SPARC32 floppy install - issues switching between floppies

2007-01-01 Thread Dan Oglesby

Package: installation-reports

Boot method:  floppy
Image version:  
http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/images/daily/sparc32/floppy/2.6/boot.img
Date:   20061219

Machine:  Sun SparcStation 5
Processor: 70Mhz
Memory: 80MB
Partitions: 

Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn: none

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [E]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:
There are some oddities when performing a floppy install of the "testing" 
version of Debian:

After
booting the system from floppy, it will not automatically eject the
boot floppy when prompting for the root floppy.  The install process
does later automatically eject the root floppy at the point where it
asks if you have a floppy disk containing drivers needed for the
install.

When you manually switch the boot floppy for the root
floppy, it takes exactly four keypresses of the ENTER key before the
system takes any action with the root floppy.  After hitting the ENTER
key on the QWERTY part of a Sun5c keyboard four times, the system
behaves normally, and you see a message that the system has found the
root image.  This is on a SparcStation 20 w/CG6 framebuffer and Sun5c
keyboard/mouse, as well as a SparcStation 5 (170Mhz) and SparcStation 5
(70Mhz) using the same keyboard and mouse between all three systems.

I've
also seen the same behaviour switching floppys during an install where
I was using a serial console instead of a real monitor/keyboard/mouse. 
It took four ENTERs to get from the boot to the root floppy on an x86
Linux workstation running Minicom in VT102 emulation and ANSI emulation.

At
this point in time, these are the only issues I've seen performing a
successful floppy based install of the SPARC32 version of Debian
"testing" on a Sun SparcStation 20, a Sun SparcStation 5 (170Mhz
processor), and a Sun SparcStation 5 (70Mhz processor).

--Dan


 
 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2007-01-01 Thread Dan Oglesby
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Thursday 21 December 2006 03:03, Dan 
Oglesby wrote:
> Could you file one new installation report for the issue that you need
> to press enter 4 times to get the root floppy loaded so we can keep
> track of that? I think that is now the only issue remaining.

Let's investigate the issue below a bit further in this report, but I'd 
still appreciate a new report for the issue above so we can reassign it 
properly and don't have to wade through all the history in this one.


Done.  I sent an email regarding the installation floppy switch issues a few 
minutes ago.


> The install completes on the SS5-70, but will not successfully boot
> after install.  It doesn't appear to load the esp module from the
> initfs, and cannot locate the root filesystem.

OK. Let's start with the basic questions:
- what are the last messages (10-15) on the console?
- do you get dropped into a debug shell on the failure?
- if so, please check:
  - if the module is present in the initrd (ls /lib/modules/)
  - if the module is loaded (lsmod)
  - if the module is listed in /etc/modules or in
/etc/initramfs-tools/modules or similar
  - if the device is recognized at all (dmesg)


I'm confident the installation process is correct with regards to the module.  
I verified that the disk I had in the SS5-70 would in fact boot with no 
modifications in an SS5-170 and the SS20 systems I have at my disposal.  All I 
did was move the drive between the systems, and power up.  All systems booted 
to a prompt.

So, the SS5-70 system is not loading the esp module during boot from the initfs 
for some reason.  It does load and configure the esp module automatically 
during the installation process.

I have the console up with a failed boot on the SS5-70.  On the systems that 
boot successfully (SS20 and SS5-170), I do see where the esp module is loaded 
and the output it generates when the drives and SCSI devices are detected.  I 
do not see this output when I boot the SS5-70 system.

The only lines that appear to be error messages are the last four, which are:

VFS:  Cannot open root device "sda2" or unknown-block(0,0)
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel panic - not syncing; VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
 <0>Press Stop-A (L1-A) to return to the boot prom

Pressing L1-A does nothing, and I am not dropped to a debug shell, or see an 
option at any time for a debug shell.  The only way to reset the system is to 
power cycle it at this point.

--Dan
 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Processed: retitle 405177 to install-report: no reboot after FLOPPY install

2007-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 405177 install-report: no reboot after FLOPPY install
Bug#405177: 
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-30 Thread Dan Oglesby
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,

Sorry for delay. I had to concentrate on other work for a bit.


Not a problem at all.  I know how that goes.  :-)


On Thursday 21 December 2006 03:03, Dan Oglesby wrote:
> Could you file one new installation report for the issue that you need
> to press enter 4 times to get the root floppy loaded so we can keep
> track of that? I think that is now the only issue remaining.

Let's investigate the issue below a bit further in this report, but I'd 
still appreciate a new report for the issue above so we can reassign it 
properly and don't have to wade through all the history in this one.


I'll open a new bug report for the SS5 machines when I return from vacation 
(after Jan 3rd).


> The install completes on the SS5-70, but will not successfully boot
> after install.  It doesn't appear to load the esp module from the
> initfs, and cannot locate the root filesystem.

OK. Let's start with the basic questions:
- what are the last messages (10-15) on the console?
- do you get dropped into a debug shell on the failure?
- if so, please check:
  - if the module is present in the initrd (ls /lib/modules/)
  - if the module is loaded (lsmod)
  - if the module is listed in /etc/modules or in
/etc/initramfs-tools/modules or similar
  - if the device is recognized at all (dmesg)

I poked around right before leaving vacation, so I can answer some of the 
questions right now.

The last thing that appears on the console is an error message stating the root 
filesystem could not be located when the system tries to switch from the initfs 
image to the / partition on the disk.

The esp module is present in the initfs image, but does not appear to load.  It 
is listed in /etc/modules in the initfs image as well.

I cannot drop to a debug shell, or even do a "Stop-A" to get to PROM at the 
point the system locks up.  It is totally unresponsive to keyboard input at the 
point where the root filesystem fails to mount.  This is with a Sun5c keyboard 
and a CG6 framebuffer for a console.

--Dan

 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-29 Thread Frans Pop
Hi,

Sorry for delay. I had to concentrate on other work for a bit.

On Thursday 21 December 2006 03:03, Dan Oglesby wrote:
> Could you file one new installation report for the issue that you need
> to press enter 4 times to get the root floppy loaded so we can keep
> track of that? I think that is now the only issue remaining.

Let's investigate the issue below a bit further in this report, but I'd 
still appreciate a new report for the issue above so we can reassign it 
properly and don't have to wade through all the history in this one.


> The install completes on the SS5-70, but will not successfully boot
> after install.  It doesn't appear to load the esp module from the
> initfs, and cannot locate the root filesystem.

OK. Let's start with the basic questions:
- what are the last messages (10-15) on the console?
- do you get dropped into a debug shell on the failure?
- if so, please check:
  - if the module is present in the initrd (ls /lib/modules/)
  - if the module is loaded (lsmod)
  - if the module is listed in /etc/modules or in
/etc/initramfs-tools/modules or similar
  - if the device is recognized at all (dmesg)

Cheers,
FJP


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-20 Thread Dan Oglesby
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 20 December 2006 05:18, Dan 
Oglesby wrote:
> Just completed a flawless install of Debian off of the 2006-12-19
> floppy images on the SS20 system.  All hardware detected automatically,
> no errors during the install, and the system rebooted to a login
> prompt.

Great! Thanks for following up.

As this report has now become a bit long and difficult to follow, I'm 
closing it.

Could you file one new installation report for the issue that you need to 
press enter 4 times to get the root floppy loaded so we can keep track of 
that? I think that is now the only issue remaining.

Cheers,
FJP


The install completes on the SS5-70, but will not successfully boot after 
install.  It doesn't appear to load the esp module from the initfs, and cannot 
locate the root filesystem.

So, the install process is fine on the SS20, but still does not install 
properly on an SS5 system.

There were no errors that I saw during the installation process.  Onboard 
ethernet and SCSI were detected automatically during the install.

--Dan

 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-20 Thread Dan Oglesby
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 20 December 2006 05:18, Dan 
Oglesby wrote:
> Just completed a flawless install of Debian off of the 2006-12-19
> floppy images on the SS20 system.  All hardware detected automatically,
> no errors during the install, and the system rebooted to a login
> prompt.

Great! Thanks for following up.

As this report has now become a bit long and difficult to follow, I'm 
closing it.

Could you file one new installation report for the issue that you need to 
press enter 4 times to get the root floppy loaded so we can keep track of 
that? I think that is now the only issue remaining.

Cheers,
FJP

If possible, could you wait until I verify the same process works on the 
SparcStation 5?  The install is almost finished, I think all that will be left 
by the time I get home is to reboot the system.  If that works, then I'm sure 
we're out of the woods on this one.

I'll submit a new bug report for the 4 x ENTER issue booting off the floppy 
when I get home tonight.

Thanks!

--Dan

 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-19 Thread Dan Oglesby
Dan Oglesby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 
Tuesday 12 December 2006 05:32, Dan Oglesby wrote:
All of my hardware in the SS5-70 is detected automatically by the 2006-12-16 
floppy images.  

The  older floppies would not automatically detect the onboard ethernet chipset 
(sunlance), so I had to choose the module manually during the install after it 
failed to detect any networking hardware.

When I was doing the installs on the SS20, I had to manually choose an ethernet 
chipset module and the SCSI module.  This was with floppies older than the 
2006-12-16 images.  I will retest the SS20 with the latest floppy images 
tonight.

--Dan


Just completed a flawless install of Debian off of the 2006-12-19 floppy images 
on the SS20 system.  All hardware detected automatically, no errors during the 
install, and the system rebooted to a login prompt.

Started the install to the SS5-70 just now.

--Dan

 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-18 Thread Dan Oglesby
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 12 December 2006 05:32, Dan 
Oglesby wrote:
> Both boots I had to manually tell it to load the lance module for my
> onboard NIC.

I can't find a lance module, so I guess you mean sunlance.


Sorry, I meant sunlance.


What exactly do you mean by "both boots"?
Does the NIC get detected automatically by the installer or not?
If it does get detected by the installer, it should automatically add the 
module to /etc/modules for the installed system. Could you check if it is 
listed in that file?


All of my hardware in the SS5-70 is detected automatically by the 2006-12-16 
floppy images.  

The older floppies would not automatically detect the onboard ethernet chipset 
(sunlance), so I had to choose the module manually during the install after it 
failed to detect any networking hardware.

When I was doing the installs on the SS20, I had to manually choose an ethernet 
chipset module and the SCSI module.  This was with floppies older than the 
2006-12-16 images.  I will retest the SS20 with the latest floppy images 
tonight.

--Dan

 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-18 Thread Dan Oglesby
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 17 December 2006 06:03, Dan 
Oglesby wrote:
> The installation went perfect, all hardware detected (network, SCSI
> controller, and hard drive), drive partitioned just fine.  After
> rebooting, it looks like the SCSI controller module is missing from the
> initial ramdisk again.  System boots from the hard drive, then can't
> find the root filesystem (can't open root device).

Is this the esp module again or a different one?

It's esp again.

This is strange because the installer should add the esp module in
/etc/initramfs-tools/modules, which in turn should ensure that the initrd 
contains and loads it.


I'm pretty sure it's in the initramfs image.  I booted from the floppies, 
switched to the 2nd and 3rd virtual console and started poking around last 
night.


Could you check if esp is listed in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules?
Could you check if the initrd actually contains the module or not (should 
be under /lib/modules/...; you can check when dropped into the debug 
shell)?


It is listed there, and I did see the esp module where I thought it was 
supposed to be (with the kernel modules).  I will verify this again tonight, as 
I am away from the machine right now (work).

I did not get dropped to a debug shell.  The system hung, and I couldn't even 
do a Stop-A on the keyboard to drop to PROM.  I had to cycle the power, boot 
like I'm doing an install ("rescue" and "expert" doesn't work from SILO, fails 
to locate the root filesystem after booting the kernel).

I booted like I was doing an install, let it detect all the hardware, then 
switched to the 2nd and 3rd virtual consoles to do the troubleshooting.

> Does this need to go into a seperate bug report since it is a different
> system (but same architecture as the SS20 I've been using)?

No, as there are no different issues I don't think a separate report adds 
anything. Thanks very much for your tests!

No problem!  :-)

--Dan

 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-18 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 05:32, Dan Oglesby wrote:
> Both boots I had to manually tell it to load the lance module for my
> onboard NIC.

I can't find a lance module, so I guess you mean sunlance.

What exactly do you mean by "both boots"?
Does the NIC get detected automatically by the installer or not?
If it does get detected by the installer, it should automatically add the 
module to /etc/modules for the installed system. Could you check if it is 
listed in that file?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-18 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 17 December 2006 06:03, Dan Oglesby wrote:
> The installation went perfect, all hardware detected (network, SCSI
> controller, and hard drive), drive partitioned just fine.  After
> rebooting, it looks like the SCSI controller module is missing from the
> initial ramdisk again.  System boots from the hard drive, then can't
> find the root filesystem (can't open root device).

Is this the esp module again or a different one?

This is strange because the installer should add the esp module in
/etc/initramfs-tools/modules, which in turn should ensure that the initrd 
contains and loads it.

Could you check if esp is listed in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules?
Could you check if the initrd actually contains the module or not (should 
be under /lib/modules/...; you can check when dropped into the debug 
shell)?

> Does this need to go into a seperate bug report since it is a different
> system (but same architecture as the SS20 I've been using)?

No, as there are no different issues I don't think a separate report adds 
anything. Thanks very much for your tests!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-16 Thread Dan Oglesby
I just did an install tonight using the floppies created on 2006-12-16 on a 
SparcStation 5, 70Mhz system w/80MB of RAM, a 4.3GB SCSI drive, and a CG6 
framebuffer.

The installation went perfect, all hardware detected (network, SCSI controller, 
and hard drive), drive partitioned just fine.  After rebooting, it looks like 
the SCSI controller module is missing from the initial ramdisk again.  System 
boots from the hard drive, then can't find the root filesystem (can't open root 
device).

Does this need to go into a seperate bug report since it is a different system 
(but same architecture as the SS20 I've been using)?

--Dan

 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-16 Thread Dan Oglesby
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Could you provide the output of 'lspci -nn' 
and 'prtconf' (from the 
sparc-utils package) for your box?


Just to make sure I wasn't incorrect in my assumptions that lspci wouldn't 
work, I installed the pciutils package and ran the utility as you asked.  It 
returned with no output.

debian:~# lspci -nn
debian:~# 


--Dan
 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-16 Thread Dan Oglesby
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Both boots I had to manually tell it to 
load the lance module for my
> onboard NIC.

Could you provide the output of 'lspci -nn' and 'prtconf' (from the 
sparc-utils package) for your box?

lspci doesn't exist on the system (no PCI slots anyway).  prtconf returns the 
following:

System Configuration:  Sun Microsystems  sun4m
Memory size: 256 Megabytes
System Peripherals (Software Nodes):

SUNW,SPARCstation-20
packages (driver probably installed)
disk-label (driver probably installed)
deblocker (driver probably installed)
obp-tftp (driver probably installed)
options (driver probably installed)
aliases (driver probably installed)
openprom (driver probably installed)
iommu (driver probably installed)
sbus (driver probably installed)
espdma (driver probably installed)
esp (driver probably installed)
sd (driver probably installed)
st (driver probably installed)
ledma (driver probably installed)
le (driver probably installed)
SUNW,bpp (driver probably installed)
SUNW,DBRIe (driver probably installed)
cgsix (driver probably installed)
obio (driver probably installed)
zs (driver probably installed)
zs (driver probably installed)
eeprom (driver probably installed)
counter (driver probably installed)
interrupt (driver probably installed)
SUNW,fdtwo (driver probably installed)
auxio (driver probably installed)
power (driver probably installed)
memory (driver probably installed)
virtual-memory (driver probably installed)
eccmemctl (driver probably installed)
SUNW,sx (driver probably installed)
TI,TMS390Z55 (driver probably installed)
TI,TMS390Z55 (driver probably installed)

I'm trying to get a SS5-70 to install via floppy, but it's not working as well 
as the SS20 did.  The installation went fine, but when it boots it can't find 
the disk again.  I'm going to try the latest disk images on the SS5 tonight and 
see if it's fixed already.

--Dan

 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 05:32, Dan Oglesby wrote:
> I first tried to boot my SS20 that contained a CG6 framebuffer and a
> Sun Wide-SCSI + 100Mbit NIC SBUS card, but it froze the system hard
> while loading the esp module.  So, I pulled the SBUS board with the
> SCSI and NIC, and tried again.  This time it detected all hardware, and
> did a successful installation.

The sparc kernel maintainer for Debian is going to look into this

> Both boots I had to manually tell it to load the lance module for my
> onboard NIC.

Could you provide the output of 'lspci -nn' and 'prtconf' (from the 
sparc-utils package) for your box?

> kernel: program parted_server is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please
> convert it to SG_IO

Known issue, but thanks for mentioning it.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpbmwftDbXt2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-11 Thread Dan Oglesby
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> It appears to work after pressing the 
Enter key on the number pad, then
> pressing the Enter key on the keyboard.  I was able to duplicate this
> on the serial console as well.  I get a ^M when I'm on the serial
> console after pressing the number pad Enter key.

OK. I doubt we'll have time to look into this before the release of Etch.
Nice to hear that floppies actually work. We've not had an installation 
report for those in ages :-)


OK, played with this again tonight, and it takes four ENTERs to get the root 
floppy to mount.  Doesn't matter about timing the ENTERs, (four quick taps of 
ENTER will get it going).  This was with the ENTER key on a Sun5c keyboard, not 
touching the one on the number pad.


> I was able to complete an install once the root image loaded, but the
> esp module doesn't get loaded in the initial ramdisk image, so the
> system won't boot properly after install.

This should be fixed with current images. Would be nice if you could 
verify.

It has been verified.  :-)

I first tried to boot my SS20 that contained a CG6 framebuffer and a Sun 
Wide-SCSI + 100Mbit NIC SBUS card, but it froze the system hard while loading 
the esp module.  So, I pulled the SBUS board with the SCSI and NIC, and tried 
again.  This time it detected all hardware, and did a successful installation.

Both boots I had to manually tell it to load the lance module for my onboard 
NIC.

The 18GB SCSI drive was detected properly, and parted was able to use the 
entire drive.

I did see the following message on the fourth virtual terminal repeating while 
parted was doing its thing:

kernel: program parted_server is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please convert 
it to SG_IO

After the install, the system booted properly, and went straight to a login 
prompt without anything that looked like an error.

I'm going to see if this works on some of my SS5 systems now.  :-)

Thanks!!!

--Dan

 
-
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-11 Thread Dan Oglesby
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (Please always reply to the bug report 
rather than individual persons.)

It looks like the message I replied to was not CC'd to the mailing list.  I'll 
make sure to CC the list from now on.

On Monday 11 December 2006 21:14, you wrote:
> Frans Pop  wrote:
> > Just tried today's testing boot floppies along with a CG6
> > framebuffer, Sun monitor, and Sun Type5 keyboard.  It still looks
> > like it needs more than one ENTER key press at the root disk prompt,
> > but it did continue the boot process.
>
> So the problem is not the enter key versus the keypad enter key, but
> rather that it needs to be pressed more than once?
>
> Were you able to complete the installation after loading the other
> floppies?
>
> P.S. Please type your replies below the text you quote (and delete any
> irrelevant text). That makes things much easier to read...
>
> It appears to work after pressing the Enter key on the number pad, then
> pressing the Enter key on the keyboard.  I was able to duplicate this
> on the serial console as well.  I get a ^M when I'm on the serial
> console after pressing the number pad Enter key.

OK. I doubt we'll have time to look into this before the release of Etch.
Nice to hear that floppies actually work. We've not had an installation 
report for those in ages :-)

> I was able to complete an install once the root image loaded, but the
> esp module doesn't get loaded in the initial ramdisk image, so the
> system won't boot properly after install.

This should be fixed with current images. Would be nice if you could 
verify.


I'll download the newest images tonight and see how things go.

I'm new to the whole Debian community, so I apologize if my postings are in the 
wrong mailing lists and such.  I'll probably switch to a different mail account 
with a real mail client tonight, so it'll be easier to format replies and keep 
things organized.

--Dan

 
-
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-11 Thread Frans Pop
(Please always reply to the bug report rather than individual persons.)

On Monday 11 December 2006 21:14, you wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just tried today's testing boot floppies along with a CG6
> > framebuffer, Sun monitor, and Sun Type5 keyboard.  It still looks
> > like it needs more than one ENTER key press at the root disk prompt,
> > but it did continue the boot process.
>
> So the problem is not the enter key versus the keypad enter key, but
> rather that it needs to be pressed more than once?
>
> Were you able to complete the installation after loading the other
> floppies?
>
> P.S. Please type your replies below the text you quote (and delete any
> irrelevant text). That makes things much easier to read...
>
> It appears to work after pressing the Enter key on the number pad, then
> pressing the Enter key on the keyboard.  I was able to duplicate this
> on the serial console as well.  I get a ^M when I'm on the serial
> console after pressing the number pad Enter key.

OK. I doubt we'll have time to look into this before the release of Etch.
Nice to hear that floppies actually work. We've not had an installation 
report for those in ages :-)

> I was able to complete an install once the root image loaded, but the
> esp module doesn't get loaded in the initial ramdisk image, so the
> system won't boot properly after install.

This should be fixed with current images. Would be nice if you could 
verify.

> I have a small pile of sun4m machines (three SparcStation 5 systems,
> one SparcStation 20 w/dual SM71 processors), with floppies and CD-ROMs.
>  I'd love to be able to run Debian on these, so anything I can do to
> help test stuff, please let me know.  I also have a handful of SBus
> cards (various framebuffers, 100Mbit + Wide SCSI, and narrow SCSI).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 08 December 2006 05:21, Dan Oglesby wrote:
> Just tried today's testing boot floppies along with a CG6 framebuffer,
> Sun monitor, and Sun Type5 keyboard.  It still looks like it needs more
> than one ENTER key press at the root disk prompt, but it did continue
> the boot process.

So the problem is not the enter key versus the keypad enter key, but 
rather that it needs to be pressed more than once?

Were you able to complete the installation after loading the other 
floppies?

P.S. Please type your replies below the text you quote (and delete any 
irrelevant text). That makes things much easier to read...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-07 Thread Dan Oglesby
Just tried today's testing boot floppies along with a CG6 framebuffer, Sun 
monitor, and Sun Type5 keyboard.  It still looks like it needs more than one 
ENTER key press at the root disk prompt, but it did continue the boot process.

--Dan

Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 03 December 2006 07:01, Dan 
Oglesby wrote:
> Comments/Problems:  After booting from the boot.img on floppy, the
> system prompted for the root.img floppy to be inserted into the floppy
> drive.  After manually ejecting the boot.img floppy and inserting the
> root.img floppy, the system would not proceed after pressing the
> "ENTER" key.

What type of keyboard do you have connected to the machine? Sun, USB, 
regular PC?


 
-
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-03 Thread Dan Oglesby
I just tried to boot from floppy again, and this time used the ENTER key on the 
numeric key pad.  It appears to work using that ENTER key.  Still did not work 
using the ENTER key on the qwerty area of the keyboard.

--Dan

Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 03 December 2006 07:01, Dan 
Oglesby wrote:
> Comments/Problems:  After booting from the boot.img on floppy, the
> system prompted for the root.img floppy to be inserted into the floppy
> drive.  After manually ejecting the boot.img floppy and inserting the
> root.img floppy, the system would not proceed after pressing the
> "ENTER" key.

What type of keyboard do you have connected to the machine? Sun, USB, 
regular PC?


 
-
Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-03 Thread Dan Oglesby
Serial console at 9600,8,n,1.  Connected to a Linux machine with minicom in 
vt102 emulation mode.

When I hit ENTER, the console drops down a  line, so it's getting the command 
(no other issues using the console so far either).

--Dan

Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 03 December 2006 07:01, Dan 
Oglesby wrote:
> Comments/Problems:  After booting from the boot.img on floppy, the
> system prompted for the root.img floppy to be inserted into the floppy
> drive.  After manually ejecting the boot.img floppy and inserting the
> root.img floppy, the system would not proceed after pressing the
> "ENTER" key.

What type of keyboard do you have connected to the machine? Sun, USB, 
regular PC?


 
-
Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-03 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 03 December 2006 07:01, Dan Oglesby wrote:
> Comments/Problems:  After booting from the boot.img on floppy, the
> system prompted for the root.img floppy to be inserted into the floppy
> drive.  After manually ejecting the boot.img floppy and inserting the
> root.img floppy, the system would not proceed after pressing the
> "ENTER" key.

What type of keyboard do you have connected to the machine? Sun, USB, 
regular PC?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install

2006-12-02 Thread Dan Oglesby

Package: installation-reports

Boot method:  floppy
Image version:  
http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/images/daily/sparc32/floppy/2.6/
Date:  2006-12-02 23:30

Machine:  Sun SparcStation 5
Processor: microSPARC II 70Mhz
Memory: 80 MB
Partitions:  none

Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn: none

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [E]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:  After booting from the boot.img on floppy, the system 
prompted for the root.img floppy to be inserted into the floppy drive.  After 
manually ejecting the boot.img floppy and inserting the root.img floppy, the 
system would not proceed after pressing the "ENTER" key.




 
 
-
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.

Bug#394079: marked as done (installation-reports: x86 floppy install failed, cpio missing)

2006-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:17:27 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394079: fixed in rootskel 1.42
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal


Hi,

I just activated my good old floppy drive and did a test
with the images from 17.10.06:

inserting the boot disk works fine, I was prompted to 
give root disk; then this:


Loading ../init: 194: cpio not found
failed to extract initrd (may be out of space on ram disk)
Giving up!


I tried with two other media for boot and root disk, but
no way. cpio is not there.



Best
Holger

-- 

==
Created with Sylpheed 2.2.2
under Debian GNU/LINUX 3.1 »Sarge«
http://counter.li.org/,  Registered LinuxUser #311290
Spamfiltering by bogofilter.sourceforge.net
=

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rootskel
Source-Version: 1.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rootskel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rootskel-bootfloppy_1.42_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.42_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.42.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.42.dsc
rootskel_1.42.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.42.tar.gz
rootskel_1.42_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.42_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rootskel package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:46:50 +0100
Source: rootskel
Binary: rootskel-bootfloppy rootskel
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.42
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team 
Changed-By: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 rootskel   - Skeleton root filesystem used by debian-installer (udeb)
 rootskel-bootfloppy - Skeleton root filesystem used by debian-installer boot 
floppy (udeb)
Closes: 394079 398255
Changes: 
 rootskel (1.42) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Sylvain Ferriol ]
   * Include klibc-utils in src-rootskel. cpio binary and klibc-utils share
 the same klibc library. Closes: #394079, #398255.
Files: 
 277cc23a052c182854fc5fc6c593c6a4 909 debian-installer standard 
rootskel_1.42.dsc
 9c31150abe684ec4cbb6caf12ea517ed 36484 debian-installer standard 
rootskel_1.42.tar.gz
 fe028f348d1ed26e0421ddfe2048cd28 6128 debian-installer standard 
rootskel_1.42_i386.udeb
 a08d6b9b7ea1846f8e2c722c41e2ce0e 88202 debian-installer extra 
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.42_i386.udeb
Package-Type: udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFW/EDgm/Kwh6ICoQRAodbAKCjmPczYRAKvteW63Z3oRQiy1uugACgrP8s
j/CwzH8exI47BfJQM7sqMdw=
=WY4W
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---


Processed (with 4 errors): Bug#394079: installation-reports: x86 floppy install failed, cpio missing: REOPEN

2006-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen  394079
Bug#394079: installation-reports: x86 floppy install failed, cpio missing
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> This problem was fixed at ~ 20061026, but now it is there
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> again (testet with images from 2006 + 20061113)
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> i386 floppies not usable.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> Holger
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#394079: installation-reports: x86 floppy install: ONE COMMENT

2006-10-20 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi,

I forgot to mention:

I had the cd-driver image written to a damaged disk.
When trying to load it, I got the message, that the load
failed, the next screen told about that one installation
step failed, and then the system hung up. 
The screen repeatly changed between the normal screen
and complete white flashing. Not usable.
Changing to e.g. vt2 worked, but was also unusable
because of the same flashing. 

Only hard reset possible.

Although that's not a common situation, I know.



Holger




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#394079: installation-reports: x86 floppy install: UPDATE - SUCCESS

2006-10-20 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi,

only for completeness:

I tried the images from 19.10.2006 and indeed it works.

First I did a try without a cd or dvd and thus loading
the additional installer modules from the mirror - success.

Then I tried with a netinst cd and without network - 
successfull, too.


Well done.



Sorry for beeing too late. I would have closed this report
with this mail, too.


As attachment the file hardware-summary generated by
the d-i module "save debug logs" (not sure, if this is
ever needed).



Holger



hardware-summary.tar.gz
Description: Binary data


Bug#394079: marked as done (installation-reports: x86 floppy install failed, cpio missing)

2006-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:22:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394079: installation-reports: x86 floppy install failed, 
cpio missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal


Hi,

I just activated my good old floppy drive and did a test
with the images from 17.10.06:

inserting the boot disk works fine, I was prompted to 
give root disk; then this:


Loading ../init: 194: cpio not found
failed to extract initrd (may be out of space on ram disk)
Giving up!


I tried with two other media for boot and root disk, but
no way. cpio is not there.



Best
Holger

-- 

==
Created with Sylpheed 2.2.2
under Debian GNU/LINUX 3.1 »Sarge«
http://counter.li.org/,  Registered LinuxUser #311290
Spamfiltering by bogofilter.sourceforge.net
=

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing this bug since it's already fixed in the archive.

-- 
see shy jo
--- End Message ---


Bug#394079: installation-reports: x86 floppy install failed, cpio missing

2006-10-20 Thread sferriol

Holger Wansing a écrit :

Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal


Hi,


hi

I just activated my good old floppy drive and did a test
with the images from 17.10.06:

inserting the boot disk works fine, I was prompted to 
give root disk; then this:



Loading ../init: 194: cpio not found
failed to extract initrd (may be out of space on ram disk)
Giving up!


I tried with two other media for boot and root disk, but
no way. cpio is not there.



as cpio is not in klibc udeb package, cpio is build separatly.
but cpio was built with libklibc 1.4.27 and boot floppy has 1.4.29 libklibc.
so you have to wait tomorrow for new floppies or go there:
http://www-timc.imag.fr/Sylvain.Ferriol/debian/d-i/i386/2006_10_19/


Best
Holger





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Bug#394079: installation-reports: x86 floppy install failed, cpio missing

2006-10-19 Thread Holger Wansing
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal


Hi,

I just activated my good old floppy drive and did a test
with the images from 17.10.06:

inserting the boot disk works fine, I was prompted to 
give root disk; then this:


Loading ../init: 194: cpio not found
failed to extract initrd (may be out of space on ram disk)
Giving up!


I tried with two other media for boot and root disk, but
no way. cpio is not there.



Best
Holger

-- 

==
Created with Sylpheed 2.2.2
under Debian GNU/LINUX 3.1 »Sarge«
http://counter.li.org/,  Registered LinuxUser #311290
Spamfiltering by bogofilter.sourceforge.net
=


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to "recognize" that the install is a floppy install?

2006-09-01 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> I do think we should take care to only use this rarely. Making lots of
> paths that are determined by boot type will make testing harder, and
> help hide bugs.


Yeah, I understand. Here the point is not really making a real branch
but just display a special debconf note to explain why some dialogs are
still using English while users did choose another language.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: How to "recognize" that the install is a floppy install?

2006-09-01 Thread Joey Hess
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Would anyone else have an idea ?
> 
> Indeed, if not already existing, such a mechanism for D-I to always
> "know" which type of install it is running could have other uses

We could add this to the /etc/lsb-release file in the installer. Just
tack on a field, like X_BOOT_METHOD=floppy.

I do think we should take care to only use this rarely. Making lots of
paths that are determined by boot type will make testing harder, and
help hide bugs.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


How to "recognize" that the install is a floppy install?

2006-08-31 Thread Christian Perrier
In #269972, I developed a patch which could be used by localechooser
to warn users that the install runs in English temporarily even if
they choose another language.

This patch is meant to be used on floppy installs where all
translations  are removed from the initial udebs for space reasons.

The only remazining problem is for localechooser to "recognize" that
it is running a floppy install.

Sven did suggest to "set some variable for floppy installs et build
time" but indeed I don't know how to do this.

Would anyone else have an idea ?

Indeed, if not already existing, such a mechanism for D-I to always
"know" which type of install it is running could have other uses

-- 




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#357704: Floppy install does not configure boot dir and grub correctly

2006-03-19 Thread Christian Perrier
> step 16 said that it had detected a list of OS's on my computer. but the
> list showed only one entry, 'Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable), which
> could refer to my existing hda3 'testing' OS or my newly installed hda4
> 'testing' OS. the entry in the list shows no device info, so i cannot
> tell whether it refers to hda3 or hda4.

It certainly refers to the old install, ie hda3.

What's puzzling is the lack of detection of the Windows install.

> my analysis: i think that the initial problem is that the OS list is not
> correct. the install script does not detect all of the OS's on hda. in
> my case, there should be 3 OSs:
> 
> hda1 // windows

Which Windows flavour?


> hda2 // linux swap
> hda3 // existing working debian 'testing' (still working well, i am
> using it now as i type)
> hda4 // newly installed 'testing' which i am trying to install
> 
> since the OS list is not correct, all of the script logic that follows
> does not have the correct input to configure grub and the grub boot menu
> correctly.
> 
> for more information, i also mounted hda on /mnt/tmp to have a look.
> again, the app software was installed, but hda4/boot is empty, except
> for the grub subdirectory and files. there is no kernel image stuff in
> hda4/boot (i am comparing it to /hda3/boot, which has vmlinuz, config,
> initrd, system.map, and all that stuff for booting the kernel.)


This is really strange, indeed. Anyone with a better idea?



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#357704: Floppy install does not configure boot dir and grub correctly

2006-03-19 Thread Anthony Merhi




Hi Christian,

thanks for your email reply. i have some more detailed info for you, based on a third installation attempt following your advice.

i re-ran the same installation on the same box and diskettes as before, and took careful notes at step 16, the 'install grub boot loader' step.

step 16 said that it had detected a list of OS's on my computer. but the list showed only one entry, 'Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable), which could refer to my existing hda3 'testing' OS or my newly installed hda4 'testing' OS. the entry in the list shows no device info, so i cannot tell whether it refers to hda3 or hda4.

(it would be good to see device info because, if there are multiple installations of the same debian release on the same box, you could tell which is which.)

then step 16 said that, if the list is complete (which it is not), it should be safe to install the boot loader to the MBR of the first harddrive. step 16 offered the default of 'install to MBR', but i did not choose this default because the list was not complete. i chose 'no', hoping to find a menu which would re-scan hda for OS's and choose again. but step 16 presented me only with some examples of how to enter the boot device. so i entered '/dev/hda' (which, i think, is the same as its default anyway), then step 16 installed the boot loader to hda.

finally, i completed the remaining steps and rebooted. grub started with only one choice, hda3, my original 'testing' installation. so the outcome of this third installation attempt is the same as the first two, so i think that my steps and menu choices were correct.

my analysis: i think that the initial problem is that the OS list is not correct. the install script does not detect all of the OS's on hda. in my case, there should be 3 OSs:

hda1 // windows
hda2 // linux swap
hda3 // existing working debian 'testing' (still working well, i am using it now as i type)
hda4 // newly installed 'testing' which i am trying to install

since the OS list is not correct, all of the script logic that follows does not have the correct input to configure grub and the grub boot menu correctly.

for more information, i also mounted hda on /mnt/tmp to have a look. again, the app software was installed, but hda4/boot is empty, except for the grub subdirectory and files. there is no kernel image stuff in hda4/boot (i am comparing it to /hda3/boot, which has vmlinuz, config, initrd, system.map, and all that stuff for booting the kernel.)

anyway, i hope this info is useful. let me know if you would like more info.


On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 08:37 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:


(third try as the stupid RBL and so-called "ant-spam system" used by
your ISP blocked my first answerplease use a real ISP)

Quoting Anthony Merhi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: installation-reports
> 
> -> 
> -> If you don't mind, please don't put my e-mail address on the web.
> -> 

The Debian BTS has a web interface. So I'm afraid that reporting this
bug already exposes your mail address.

I'm alays puzzled by people wanting to hide their mail address. Do you
really want to communicate? :-)


> I booted boot.img in expert mode, mounted root.img, loaded
> net-drivers.img for the SiS900, configured static IP, then downloaded
> the rest from a mirror without a problem.
> 
> I chose Standard System and Desktop/Workstation for software.
> 
> However, while the app software was installed to the correct partition
> (hda4), the OS was not installed, and grub did not add hda4 as a menu
> choice.


You don't explain us what you exactly did at the GRUB installation
step. Did you leave the default choices or did you something weird
like asking to install GRUB on hda4?

If you did the latter, then what you see is expectedthe
grub-installer did not touch the GRUB install on the MBR, which is
still the one you see booting. This GRUB points to /dev/hda3 as
root...which hasn't been touched by the installer and of course does
not offer hda4 as an option.

If you leave the *default* GRUB option to install on /dev/hda (ie the
MBR), then a new GRUB will be installed on the MBR and it will use
/dev/hda4 as rootand will offer the 3 choices, I guess.









Bug#357704: Floppy install does not configure boot dir and grub correctly

2006-03-19 Thread Christian Perrier
(second try as the stupid RBL and so-called "ant-spam system" used by
your ISP blocked my first answerplease use a real ISP)

Quoting Anthony Merhi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: installation-reports
> 
> -> 
> -> If you don't mind, please don't put my e-mail address on the web.
> -> 

The Debian BTS has a web interface. So I'm afraid that reporting this
bug already exposes your mail address.

I'm alays puzzled by people wanting to hide their mail address. Do you
really want to communicate? :-)


> I booted boot.img in expert mode, mounted root.img, loaded
> net-drivers.img for the SiS900, configured static IP, then downloaded
> the rest from a mirror without a problem.
> 
> I chose Standard System and Desktop/Workstation for software.
> 
> However, while the app software was installed to the correct partition
> (hda4), the OS was not installed, and grub did not add hda4 as a menu
> choice.


You don't explain us what you exactly did at the GRUB installation
step. Did you leave the default choices or did you something weird
like asking to install GRUB on hda4?

If you did the latter, then what you see is expectedthe
grub-installer did not touch the GRUB install on the MBR, which is
still the one you see booting. This GRUB points to /dev/hda3 as
root...which hasn't been touched by the installer and of course does
not offer hda4 as an option.

If you leave the *default* GRUB option to install on /dev/hda (ie the
MBR), then a new GRUB will be installed on the MBR and it will use
/dev/hda4 as rootand will offer the 3 choices, I guess.







Bug#357704: Floppy install does not configure boot dir and grub correctly

2006-03-18 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Anthony Merhi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: installation-reports
> 
> -> 
> -> If you don't mind, please don't put my e-mail address on the web.
> -> 

The Debian BTS has a web interface. So I'm afraid that reporting this
bug already exposes your mail address.

I'm alays puzzled by people wanting to hide their mail address. Do you
really want to communicate? :-)


> I booted boot.img in expert mode, mounted root.img, loaded
> net-drivers.img for the SiS900, configured static IP, then downloaded
> the rest from a mirror without a problem.
> 
> I chose Standard System and Desktop/Workstation for software.
> 
> However, while the app software was installed to the correct partition
> (hda4), the OS was not installed, and grub did not add hda4 as a menu
> choice.


You don't explain us what you exactly did at the GRUB installation
step. Did you leave the default choices or did you something weird
like asking to install GRUB on hda4?

If you did the latter, then what you see is expectedthe
grub-installer did not touch the GRUB install on the MBR, which is
still the one you see booting. This GRUB points to /dev/hda3 as
root...which hasn't been touched by the installer and of course does
not offer hda4 as an option.

If you leave the *default* GRUB option to install on /dev/hda (ie the
MBR), then a new GRUB will be installed on the MBR and it will use
/dev/hda4 as rootand will offer the 3 choices, I guess.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#357704: Floppy install does not configure boot dir and grub correctly

2006-03-18 Thread Anthony Merhi




Package: installation-reports

-> 
-> If you don't mind, please don't put my e-mail address on the web.
-> 

Boot method: 
Floppy. 4 x 1.44 mb

Image version: 
17-Mar-2006 from http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/access.

Date: 18-Mar-2006, around 6:00 EST

Machine: Spare parts, mobo about 3-4 years old. Fairly modern. Runs GNU/Debian well.

Processor: AMD K7

Memory: 1GB

Partitions: 
Filesystem    Type   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
[#/dev/hda1 ntfs (not mounted)]
[#/dev/hda2 swap]
/dev/hda3 reiserfs    16602624   8456792   8145832  51% /
[#/dev/hda4 reiserfs (*** not mounted, but see below)]
tmpfs    tmpfs  518412 0    518412   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs    tmpfs  518412   100    518312   1% /dev


Output of lspci and lspci -n:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 741/741GX/M741 Host (rev 03)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS AGP Port (virtual PCI-to-PCI bridge)
:00:02.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS964 [MuTIOL Media IO] (rev 36)
:00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] (rev 01)
:00:03.0 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 0f)
:00:03.1 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 0f)
:00:03.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 0f)
:00:03.3 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 2.0 Controller
:00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS900 PCI Fast Ethernet (rev 91)
:00:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 0a)
:00:0a.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port (rev 0a)
:00:0b.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 Pro Ultra TR
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200] (rev 01)
:01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200] (Secondary) (rev 01)

:00:00.0 0600: 1039:0741 (rev 03)
:00:01.0 0604: 1039:0003
:00:02.0 0601: 1039:0964 (rev 36)
:00:02.5 0101: 1039:5513 (rev 01)
:00:03.0 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
:00:03.1 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
:00:03.2 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
:00:03.3 0c03: 1039:7002
:00:04.0 0200: 1039:0900 (rev 91)
:00:0a.0 0401: 1102:0002 (rev 0a)
:00:0a.1 0980: 1102:7002 (rev 0a)
:00:0b.0 0300: 1002:5452
:01:00.0 0300: 1002:5961 (rev 01)
:01:00.1 0380: 1002:5941 (rev 01)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O] *** but see below
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [E]
Reboot: [E]

Comments/Problems:

  and ideas you had during the initial install.>

The install went perfectly (but I do miss full-screen ncurses-style menus).

I booted boot.img in expert mode, mounted root.img, loaded net-drivers.img for the SiS900, configured static IP, then downloaded the rest from a mirror without a problem.

I chose Standard System and Desktop/Workstation for software.

However, while the app software was installed to the correct partition (hda4), the OS was not installed, and grub did not add hda4 as a menu choice.

Background: I have 1 hardisk, hda, with 4 partitions:
hda1 ntfs for Windows, should I need to do something with that thing.
hda2 linux paging
hda3 reiserfs for my normal GNU/Debian boot device and root (been working fine with 'testing' for a long time)
hda4 an empty partition on which I was trying to install afresh the lastest GNU/Debian

Prior to this install, grub would offer hda1 (Windows) and hda3 (2.6.15) as boot choices from the MBR.

My goal was to keep hda1 and hda3 intact, and try a fresh install on hda4, with safe fallback to hda3 or even hda1 (ugh!).
After the install, I expected grub to offer hda1, hda3, and also hda4 (the new fresh install) as well.
But it offered only hda3, zapped hda1 (as a menu choice; I can still mount ntfs, so it's alive), and never added hda4, the new install.

After rebooting, the system booted up as usual on hda3 (with a different grub timeout), and I mounted hda4 to take a look-see.
All of the /usr/* stuff was installed as well as /etc and so on, but 'boot was empty, except for the grub subdir and its file, including menu.lst.

So it seems that something went wrong when the configure grub stage ran. The install process changed grub stuff on hda3 as well as creating the /boot/grub dir on hda4. Odd.

I performed the whole install twice because I thought that I might have chose the wrong menu number somewhere along the way (being used to full-screen ncurses).

Also, I notice that the /etc/

Re: Floppy install: weird Arabic glyph

2006-02-16 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Mohammed Adnène Trojette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006, Davide Viti wrote:
> > While writing some instructions about doing a floppy install using
> > qemu on the wiki [1] I noticed a weird glyph in the Arabic string.
> > I grabbed a screenshot [2] which shows the problem (compare floppy
> > vs. netboot)
> > Not sure if it's a known problem.
> 
> The right one is correct.
> The left one neither uses ligatures (wrong font?) nor respects RTL
> direction.

This is probably because libfribidi is not available on the root
floppy.

I'm afraid there's not much we can do about it. Maybe have a special
template with NO translations for "Choose language" and display it
instead of the standard template with bilingual entries.


Anyway, on floppy installs, if one chooses Arabic or any other
language than English, the installation will continue in English until
packages with translations are downloaded from the network or the
CDSee #269972 for which I just proposed a patch to warn users
about this limitation.






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Floppy install: weird Arabic glyph

2006-02-16 Thread Mohammed Adnène Trojette
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006, Davide Viti wrote:
> While writing some instructions about doing a floppy install using
> qemu on the wiki [1] I noticed a weird glyph in the Arabic string.
> I grabbed a screenshot [2] which shows the problem (compare floppy
> vs. netboot)
> Not sure if it's a known problem.

The right one is correct.
The left one neither uses ligatures (wrong font?) nor respects RTL
direction.

I hope this will help,
-- 
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Floppy install: weird Arabic glyph

2006-02-16 Thread Davide Viti
While writing some instructions about doing a floppy install using
qemu on the wiki [1] I noticed a weird glyph in the Arabic string.
I grabbed a screenshot [2] which shows the problem (compare floppy
vs. netboot)
Not sure if it's a known problem.

regards,
Davide

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Qemu
[2] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/floppy_install_ar.png


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#291453: Installation report, Sarge/d-i rc2, 20050120, floppy install, x86

2005-01-20 Thread Klas Adolfsson
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: d-i rc2 floppies (root.img + boot.img + 
net-drivers.img)
uname -a: Linux pitr 2.4.27-2-586-tsc #1 Thu Dec 30 18:06:49 JST 2004 i586 
GNU/Linux
Date: 20050119-20
Method: Floppy boot and network installation
Machine: Fuijutsu desktop PC
Processor: Pentium II/200 MHz
Memory: 80 Mb
Root Device: NEC IDE 1,7Gb
Root Size/partition table (df output):
Filsystem 1K-blockAnvänt Tillgängl Anv% Monterat på
/dev/hda2   685777391811257376  61% /
tmpfs39400 0 39400   0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda1   793680708548 44816  95% /media/hda1

Output of lspci and lspci -n:
:00:00.0 0600: 8086:7030 (rev 02)
:00:0c.0 0601: 8086:7000 (rev 01)
:00:0c.1 0101: 8086:7010
:00:0c.2 0c03: 8086:7020 (rev 01)
:00:0d.0 0300: 1002:5654 (rev 40)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Fel (beskriv utförligt nedan på engelska), [ ] = testade ej
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [E?]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O/E]
Reboot: [E]
Comments/Problems:
--
First, some observations about the installation manual:
My first problem was finding the correct floppy images. I think either 
section 5.1.4 of the manual (Booting the Installer on Intel x86/Booting from 
Floppies) or section 4.3 (Creating Floppies from Disk Images) should explain 
which images I need or at least link directly to the MANIFEST file. That 
link is now in section 4.2.1 where it is not easily found. A link to the ftp 
directory containing the floppies and to rawrite/rwwrtwin would also be 
handy. Also, I think that the section about floppy reliability should be 
moved from 5.3.1 to 4.3. These changes would get all important information 
about boot floppies in two places instead of four. OK, I can now see that 
section A.2.2 actually does some of what I ask for. Is it really necessary 
to spread information to all these places?

In general, I also think that chapters 4 and 5 of the manual should be 
reorganized from "Obtaining media" and "Boot" to one chapter covering the 
entire process of different types of installations 
(Floppy/CD/Netboot/USB/harddrive). Sections A through C should be integrated 
with the beginning of the document.

These comments apply to the installation manual at 
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/index.html, as of 2005-01-05.

Now to the installation:
I choose Swedish as my language in the first screen, but didn't get swedish 
until several screens later. That could have been really confusing if I 
hadn't understod english quite well.

On my admittedly very slow computer there are several blank screens that 
come up after a choice has been made and they sometimes last for more than a 
couple of seconds. This may give the impression that d-i has hung, but is no 
big problem.

I tried to get an old ISA network card working, but failed. I would have 
liked rmmod to be present on the system though, now I had to reboot 
(shifting three floppies) every time I wanted to try another IRQ. I finally 
gave up and replaced the network card with one that worked.

Shouldn't the installation floppies give me the choice to insert a CD (the 
netinst image for example)? It just downloaded everything from the Debian 
mirror. Or should I somehow have used the CD instead of the root floppy? The 
downloads went OK anyway, but not completely smooth. The installer tried to 
download Packages.gz three times before getting it right.

Partitioning went smoothly, I just reused (reformated) an old ext2 partition 
(hda2) where I used to have Hurd installed. I ignored a partition (hda1) 
with an old Debian (Linux) installation and reused a swap partition (hda3). 
There was a tiny skull indicated by my new root partition, but the installer 
happily allowed me to carry on and the manual doesn't mention it. What does 
it mean?

After doing the base install, I tried to install GRUB. It all seemed OK (My 
old Debian install was even identified correctly), but the reboot failed 
with "GRUB hard disk error", so I had to start over from the beginning. I 
tried LILO instead, with success. This time though, my other Debian 
installation was not detected.

After the reboot I finally got the option to use my CD, but I settled for 
HTTP install anyway and it worked out just fine. I choose the web server and 
file server tasks, not sure at that point if file server meant NFS, Samba or 
FTP.

Conclusions:

I liked the new debian-installer very much, thank you. Even though I didn't 
use LVM or RAID this time I really appreciate your work with that. The GRUB 
problem is of course unacceptable, especially for people who hasn't got a 
clue about what a boot loa

Bug#280519: marked as done (Boot-floppy install fails to see net driver disk in USB floppy drive)

2004-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:17:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280519: fixed in floppy-retriever 1.04
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2004 23:21:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 09 15:21:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atarelbas01.hp.com (atlrel6.hp.com) [156.153.255.205] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CRfJ1-00011z-00; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:21:43 -0800
Received: from janus0.fc.hp.com (janus0.fc.hp.com [15.6.89.23])
by atlrel6.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9DA4679
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  9 Nov 2004 18:21:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from robsims.ipf.fc.hp.com (robsims.ipf.fc.hp.com [156.153.222.168])
by janus0.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BB712045
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  9 Nov 2004 16:21:42 -0700 (MST)
Received: by robsims.ipf.fc.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 20291)
id 03F861BBD9; Tue,  9 Nov 2004 16:21:41 -0700 (MST)
From: Rob Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: HP CVL
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Boot-floppy install fails to see net driver disk in USB floppy drive
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:21:41 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: debian-installer
Version: pre-rc2

I used the i386 floppy images to install to a Sony PCG-C1X which has no 
CD-ROM or floppy disk controller.  Booting was done via a USB floppy 
drive.  Boot followed by root disks (in expert mode) worked until I was 
prompted for a driver disk.  The system failed to see the network 
driver image, and simply returned to the load driver prompt each time I 
tried.

Workaround:
I changed to another virtual console, mounted the corresponding SCSI 
device to /floppy, changed back to the setup console, and installation 
proceeded from there via a Netgear PCMCIA network adapter.
-- 
Rob

---
Received: (at 280519-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2004 18:23:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 15 10:23:13 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CTlVR-0007R6-00; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:23:13 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CTlPY-0004r5-00; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:17:08 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#280519: fixed in floppy-retriever 1.04
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:17:08 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: floppy-retriever
Source-Version: 1.04

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
floppy-retriever, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

floppy-retriever_1.04.dsc
  to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_1.04.dsc
floppy-retriever_1.04.tar.gz
  to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_1.04.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_1.04_all.udeb
  to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_1.04_all.udeb
load-floppy_1.04_all.udeb
  to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/load-floppy_1.04_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated floppy-retriever package)

(This me

Bug#280519: Boot-floppy install fails to see net driver disk in USB floppy drive

2004-11-15 Thread Joey Hess
I've found the problem, and a fix has been uploaded. It should show up
in the floppy images built tomorrow. I'll try to do some usb floppy
testing of my own, though it's a real pain to do with real floppies.

-- 
see shy jo



Bug#280519: Boot-floppy install fails to see net driver disk in USB floppy drive

2004-11-14 Thread Rob Sims
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 07:36:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Hmm, it's supposed to prompt for a device to mount in this case. If you
> can boot d-i with DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 and reproduce that and get a copy of
> /var/log/syslog that would help debug this. Failing that
> /var/log/debian-installer/syslog from your installed system might be
> useful.

Here's the DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 syslog, before and after mounting the floppy
manually:
http://www.robsims.com/nomountusb.syslog
http://www.robsims.com/nomountusb.syslog.after

There was no /var/log/debian-installer/syslog on the installed system.
drwxr-xr-x  2 robsims robsims   4096 Nov 14 06:28 cdebconf
-rw-r--r--  1 robsims robsims  14909 Nov 14 06:28 hardware-summary
-rw-r--r--  1 robsims robsims292 Nov 14 06:28 messages
-rw-r--r--  1 robsims robsims 182421 Nov 14 06:28 partman
-rw-r--r--  1 robsims robsims  43278 Nov 14 06:28 status

./cdebconf:
total 3128
-rw-r--r--  1 robsims robsims   54410 Nov 14 06:28 questions.dat
-rw-r--r--  1 robsims robsims 3133921 Nov 14 06:28 templates.dat

-- 
Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#280519: Boot-floppy install fails to see net driver disk in USB floppy drive

2004-11-09 Thread Joey Hess
Rob Sims wrote:
> I used the i386 floppy images to install to a Sony PCG-C1X which has no 
> CD-ROM or floppy disk controller.  Booting was done via a USB floppy 
> drive.  Boot followed by root disks (in expert mode) worked until I was 
> prompted for a driver disk.  The system failed to see the network 
> driver image, and simply returned to the load driver prompt each time I 
> tried.

Hmm, it's supposed to prompt for a device to mount in this case. If you
can boot d-i with DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 and reproduce that and get a copy of
/var/log/syslog that would help debug this. Failing that
/var/log/debian-installer/syslog from your installed system might be
useful.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#280519: Boot-floppy install fails to see net driver disk in USB floppy drive

2004-11-09 Thread Rob Sims
Package: debian-installer
Version: pre-rc2

I used the i386 floppy images to install to a Sony PCG-C1X which has no 
CD-ROM or floppy disk controller.  Booting was done via a USB floppy 
drive.  Boot followed by root disks (in expert mode) worked until I was 
prompted for a driver disk.  The system failed to see the network 
driver image, and simply returned to the load driver prompt each time I 
tried.

Workaround:
I changed to another virtual console, mounted the corresponding SCSI 
device to /floppy, changed back to the setup console, and installation 
proceeded from there via a Netgear PCMCIA network adapter.
-- 
Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#272310: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac G3 tower

2004-09-19 Thread Joey Hess
Rick Thomas wrote:
> I tried the PowerMac install floppy set from the 18th

Most images built on the 18th are broken in the way you describe, I'd
suggest trying a different build.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#272310: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac G3 tower

2004-09-19 Thread Rick Thomas
Package: installation-reports
I tried the PowerMac install floppy set from the 18th
   Index of /~luther/d-i/images/2004-09-18/powerpc/floppy-2.4
NameLast modified   Size  Description

 [DIR]  Parent Directory26-Aug-2004 21:35  -
 [   ]  asian-root.img  18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.1M
 [   ]  boot.img18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.4M
 [   ]  cd-drivers.img  18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.4M
 [   ]  net-drivers.img 18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.4M
 [   ]  ofonlyboot.img  18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.4M
 [   ]  root-2.img  18-Sep-2004 01:35   1.4M
 [   ]  root.img18-Sep-2004 01:37   1.2M
   
_

Apache/1.3.26 Server at people.debian.org Port 80

The boot floppy reads OK and calls for the root floppy, which also 
reads OK.
It asks for Language (I gave it English), then the screen started 
blinking.

Switching to the other consoles (opt-F2, -F3, -F4), which are also 
blinking, so it's hard to get any details, it appears that the 
/sbin/debian-installer process is crashing and restarting 
repeatedly.

Enjoy!
Rick

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 05:15:34PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I tried again with the latest floppies:
> 
> Index of /~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy-2.4
> 
>  NameLast modified   Size  Description
> 
> 
>  Parent Directory26-Aug-2004 21:35  -
>  asian-root.img  13-Sep-2004 03:16   1.2M
>  boot.img13-Sep-2004 03:17   1.4M
>  cd-drivers.img  13-Sep-2004 03:17   1.4M
>  net-drivers.img 13-Sep-2004 03:17   1.4M
>  ofonlyboot.img  13-Sep-2004 03:17   1.4M
>  root-2.img  13-Sep-2004 03:17   1.4M
>  root.img13-Sep-2004 03:18   1.3M
> 
> Apache/1.3.26 Server at people.debian.org Port 80
> 
> 
> No change.
> 
> 1) The ofonlyboot still doesn't give me a text screen.
> 
> 2) Loading the root-2 floppy still gives me an error message about 
> not finding any driver modules, which I ignore and it loads the 
> root-2 floppy anyway.
> 
> 3) No reasonable combination of choice of mirrors 
> (ftp.us.debian.org vs debian.uchicago.edu) and distributions 
> (testing vs unstable) give me anything but "no disks found".
> 
> 4) For what it's worth, at least one combination of mirror and 
> distro (I don't remember exactly which -- I *think* it was uchicago 
> and testing) complained about not being able to find any driver 
> modules (presumably) on the mirror.  But the other combinations 
> didn't complain.  (So maybe the uchicago unstable distro does have 
> driver modules for the 2.4.27 kernel, but  their testing 
> doesn't...  Does that make sense?  Is there any way to check this?)
> 
> 5) Two of the 2.6 floppy images are still too large to fit on a 
> physical 1.44 MB disk.

Sorry, i haven't had time to work on this recently. On the other hand, Jens
managed to boot the 2.6 kernel in miboot, and i normally adapted things to it,
let's see how the builds go today.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-13 Thread Rick Thomas
On Friday, September 10, 2004, at 05:04 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
The "ofonlyboot" has not changed.  It reads and inverts the colors 
of the tuxmac, but never switches to text-mode screen from the 
inverted color tuxmac.

The boot floppy reads and switches to the text screen then asks 
for the root floppy, which it reads.  It then asks for language 
(English) and location (US) (but not keyboard layout) then invites 
me to load drivers from a floppy.  I gave it the "root-2" floppy 
and it complained about not being able to find any kernel drivers 
on that floppy.  I chose  and re-executed "load drivers 
from a floppy".  This time I gave it the net-drivers floppy, and 
it was happy.  Still thinking that we wouldn't get any where 
without the root-2 floppy loading (and being a bit bull headed 
anyway) I tried "load drivers from floppy" for the third time, and 
again fed it the root-2.  It complained again about not finding 
any kernel modules.  This time I told it to "continue without 
loading drivers" and to my amazement, it started decoding the 
stuff from the root-2 floppy!  Curioser and curioser!

I think it was at this point that it asked for my keyboard layout, 
and suggested "European" as default, even though I had given it 
every reason to suspect that US-English was my preferred locale.  
I've reported this violation of the principle of least 
astonishment before.

It proceeded then to find my ethernet interface (remember I'd 
loaded the net-drivers floppy earlier) and do DHCP discovery on 
it.  This succeeded, as expected.  When it asked, I chose the 
uchicago mirror as usual, and it loaded the installer-components 
list (I think -- I didn't get the exact words) after which it 
*again* complained about not finding any kernel modules!  I told 
it to continue anyway, and it started downloading and unpacking 
installer components from the uchicago mirror (presumably).

When it got done with that and moved on to the partitioner, it 
couldn't find any of my disks (not my IDE main disk or my SCSI Zip 
disk).  The only IDE think it knew about was the CD-ROM drive.  
Exploring on the F2 console showed that it wasn't just the 
partitioner that was confused.  There was no evidence of IDE or 
SCSI disks in /proc or /dev.  (Same as last time -- no progress on 
that front...)

So I wrapped it up and took a tea break to write this report.
I have to consider the check for kernel modules at inappropriate 
times to be a serious bug...

I tried again with the latest floppies:
Index of /~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy-2.4
 NameLast modified   Size  Description

 Parent Directory26-Aug-2004 21:35  -
 asian-root.img  13-Sep-2004 03:16   1.2M
 boot.img13-Sep-2004 03:17   1.4M
 cd-drivers.img  13-Sep-2004 03:17   1.4M
 net-drivers.img 13-Sep-2004 03:17   1.4M
 ofonlyboot.img  13-Sep-2004 03:17   1.4M
 root-2.img  13-Sep-2004 03:17   1.4M
 root.img13-Sep-2004 03:18   1.3M

Apache/1.3.26 Server at people.debian.org Port 80
No change.
1) The ofonlyboot still doesn't give me a text screen.
2) Loading the root-2 floppy still gives me an error message about 
not finding any driver modules, which I ignore and it loads the 
root-2 floppy anyway.

3) No reasonable combination of choice of mirrors 
(ftp.us.debian.org vs debian.uchicago.edu) and distributions 
(testing vs unstable) give me anything but "no disks found".

4) For what it's worth, at least one combination of mirror and 
distro (I don't remember exactly which -- I *think* it was uchicago 
and testing) complained about not being able to find any driver 
modules (presumably) on the mirror.  But the other combinations 
didn't complain.  (So maybe the uchicago unstable distro does have 
driver modules for the 2.4.27 kernel, but  their testing 
doesn't...  Does that make sense?  Is there any way to check this?)

5) Two of the 2.6 floppy images are still too large to fit on a 
physical 1.44 MB disk.

Any thoughts?
Rick

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-12 Thread Frans Pop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

(Please don't CC the BTS on subjects like this that don't really have 
anything to do with the bug itself.)

Hello Russel,

On Saturday 11 September 2004 13:11, Russell Hires wrote:
> I've offered my services before in writing up some docs (or simply
> modifying the woody ones to fit the sarge install) in a couple of
> previous threads.

Always happy when help is offered.
If you'd like to help on the manual, it would be very good if you could 
check the Mac-specific portions of the manual. The problem with Mac's is, 
as I understand it, that there are several different families of hardware 
that require different approaches (e.g. different bootloaders). It is 
important to keep these separated and to make sure we cover them all.

The suggestion from Rick to first get to know your way around the installer 
is very valuable.

The current version of the manual itself can be found on [1].
Start by reading the document [2] for background information.
Next, get an _anonymous_ SVN checkout of the manual [3].
(Note: a full checkout for d-i is 223MB. If you'd like to just checkout the 
manual, you can use 'debian-installer/installer/doc'.)

Look for files in './doc/manual/en/...'. Most Mac-specific parts will be in 
directories named powerpc or documents named powerpc.xml.
There is also Mac-specific stuff hidden in other documents. You can find 
these by grepping for 'arch="powerpc"'.

Start by sending in corrections to this list (patches are preferred). 
Someone will pick them up and make sure they're included.
If you're not comfortable with xml, just send in 'normal' texts and we'll 
find a way to include them as well.

[1]http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/
[2]http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/d-i/trunk/installer/doc/manual/translations.txt
[3]http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/svn

Cheers,
FJP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBRMLBgm/Kwh6ICoQRAtL1AJ9+9CHdN+Qy1ldr9/YRwY/DiFQuKQCeOaOk
jS7jMukHCZB57vEmu2DQJCI=
=KhQC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-12 Thread Joey Hess
Frans Pop wrote:
> Ignoring this message will mean your installation is always going to fail as 
> the installer won't recognize your disk.

Nope.. This is a bad interaction between the new warning message in anna
and sven's new powerpc root-2 floppy hack. Now anna will complain if any
one floppy full of udebs does not happen to contain a kernel module.
Good for regular driver floppies, but not for this one, which, AIUI,
does not contain any drivers at all, only a few udebs that apparently
don't fit anywhere else.

IMHO, this hack should go away, or someone will need to write some code
to explcitly deal with it by prompting the user for this floppy and
bypassing the check in anna..

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-11 Thread Rick Thomas
On Thursday, September 9, 2004, at 01:23 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 12:45:29PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Ummm... The contents of
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy-2.4/
haven't changed in the last few days.  Is the build process stalled
somewhere?
[DIR] 2004-09-08_RSYNC_IN_PROGRESS/ 07-Sep-2004 22:05  -
[DIR] 2004-09-09_RSYNC_IN_PROGRESS/ 08-Sep-2004 22:05  -
Hmmm.. It seems to be doing it again...
 2004-09-11/   10-Sep-2004 23:13  -
 2004-09-12_RSYNC_IN_PROGRESS/ 11-Sep-2004 22:05  -
 daily/10-Sep-2004 23:13  -
It's been this way for over an hour...
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-11 Thread Rick Thomas
On Saturday, September 11, 2004, at 07:11 AM, Russell Hires wrote:

P.S. When are you finally going to start work on the 
manual?
All joking aside... That is an important task!  But I kinda figured it
was less important than getting the software working at all on 
oldworld
hardware, since I seem to be the only one on the list who has oldworld
pmac hardware available for testing.  If there were someone else who
could do the testing part, I'd have time to work on the documentation
part...  Any takers out there?

Rick
I've offered my services before in writing up some docs (or simply
modifying the woody ones to fit the sarge install) in a couple of
previous threads. Meanwhile, I'm running on a G3/266 that I'd be 
willing
to test with. Also, I need help with setting my G3 to send output to a
serial console, since the 2.6.x kernels don't give my voodoo3 card any
console data.

Russell
OK Russell, you're on!
Here's what you need to do:
First, google a bit to find and get copies of the distribution 
files for BootX, miboot, and quik -- the three boot-loaders that 
work on OldWorld PowerMacs.  Read and try to understand the 
documentation that comes with the package distributions.  Most of 
it is sketchy, but if you combine it with more googling for stuff 
in the various mailinglist archives (debian and YellowDog Linux, in 
particular, but also the PowerPC Linux mailing list and any other 
distros that support PowerPC, such as SuSE and Fedora)  and there's 
useful (if anecdotal) stuff in several people's personal home web 
pages as well.

Retrieve and read the Apple Tech notes on Open Firmware.  Start 
with TN1061 and follow pointers from there.  There's also lots of 
useful stuff on the web.  Google for "Open Firmware Apple 
macintosh".  There are also some very useful docs about using 
OpenFirmware with NetBSD.

If you're really dedicated, the first stage should take you a 
couple of weeks.

Second, partition your disk so that you have plenty of free space 
to install test releases of Debian into.  Each installation takes a 
minimum of about 1.5 GB -- more if you want to make it actually 
useful.  So multiply 2-3 GB by the maximum number of test 
installations you intend to make before you wipe the disk and start 
over clean.  On that disk (or another one dedicated to the purpose) 
also set up an HFS partition (*not* HFS-plus -- Debian does not at 
this time support access to HFS-plus filesystems from inside the 
installer) of about 1 GB (more if you want it to be actually useful 
other than as an intermediate boot loader.  If you're going to run 
Toast here, you should allow plenty of space [gigabytes] for 
CD-images).  Install MacOS-9 there.  Then install BootX (both the 
BootX extension and the BootX.app application) according to the 
instructions you got with the BootX distribution.  MacOS-X does not 
support BootX.  (Unfortunately, part of the MacOS_X boot loader is 
called "bootx".  It's not related to the one we are interested in 
here.)

Third, download the latest d-i businesscard iso, and burn it (I use 
Toast) to a CD-RW (don't waste a CD-R on it -- you're probably only 
going to use it a couple of times at most).  Copy the kernel of 
your choice from the CD (install:powerpc:vmlinux or 
install:powerpc:2.4:vmlinux) into the "System Folder:Linux Kernels" 
folder of your MacOS-9 partition, and the initrd.gz file from the 
same place to the "System Folder:Linux Ramdisks" folder.  Invoke 
BootX.app, set the appropriate parameters and let her rip.  Answer 
the questions and file an installation report.

Dig out my previous d-i installation reports for OldWorld PowerPC 
installations from the mailing list archives.  They may give you 
some useful hints.

Fourth, try a floppy disk install.  Contact Sven for instructions 
on where to download the latest floppy images.  Let it try to 
install the quik bootloader, and see if you can figure out how to 
make that work.  If you succeed in this, let me know.  I haven't 
gotten this far yet.

When you're completely familiar with all the various aspects of 
booting, you can start on re-writing a "D-I on OldWorld 
installation manual".

Contact me if you have questions at any point.  I've left out a 
massive amount of detail!

Enjoy!
Rick

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-11 Thread Russell Hires

> > 
> > P.S. When are you finally going to start work on the manual?
> 
> All joking aside... That is an important task!  But I kinda figured it
> was less important than getting the software working at all on oldworld
> hardware, since I seem to be the only one on the list who has oldworld
> pmac hardware available for testing.  If there were someone else who
> could do the testing part, I'd have time to work on the documentation
> part...  Any takers out there?
> 
> Rick
> 
I've offered my services before in writing up some docs (or simply
modifying the woody ones to fit the sarge install) in a couple of
previous threads. Meanwhile, I'm running on a G3/266 that I'd be willing
to test with. Also, I need help with setting my G3 to send output to a
serial console, since the 2.6.x kernels don't give my voodoo3 card any
console data. 

Russell



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-10 Thread Rick_Thomas
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 17:57, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 10 September 2004 23:04, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > When it asked, I chose the
> > uchicago mirror as usual, and it loaded the installer-components
> > list (I think -- I didn't get the exact words) after which it
> > *again* complained about not finding any kernel modules!  I told it
> > to continue anyway, and it started downloading and unpacking
> > installer components from the uchicago mirror (presumably).
> 
> Ignoring this message will mean your installation is always going to fail as 
> the installer won't recognize your disk.
> 
> Missing installer modules probably means you are using an incorrect 
> distribution on your mirror.
> You probably need to select 'unstable' instead of using the default 'testing'.
> 
> You can do this by backing up to the menu (for example from country-chooser), 
> changing debconf priority to medium, and then choose 'unstable' when you are 
> selecting your mirror.
> 
> The reason is there are kernel-changes happening ATM and the version the 
> floppies are build with is probably not yet available in testing.

Well... these were the 2.4 floppies.  Does that make a difference?

I'll try it with a different mirror.  That's easy and shouldn't take too
much time.

The pmac 2.6 floppies have worse problems than that -- specifically, the
net-drivers.img and the root.img files are both too large for a 1.44 MB
floppy, and the Mac floppy drives can't handle floppy disks written at
2.88 MB density the way some PC drives do.

> 
> Cheers,
> Frans
> 
> P.S. When are you finally going to start work on the manual?

All joking aside... That is an important task!  But I kinda figured it
was less important than getting the software working at all on oldworld
hardware, since I seem to be the only one on the list who has oldworld
pmac hardware available for testing.  If there were someone else who
could do the testing part, I'd have time to work on the documentation
part...  Any takers out there?

Rick





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 10 September 2004 23:04, Rick Thomas wrote:
> When it asked, I chose the
> uchicago mirror as usual, and it loaded the installer-components
> list (I think -- I didn't get the exact words) after which it
> *again* complained about not finding any kernel modules!  I told it
> to continue anyway, and it started downloading and unpacking
> installer components from the uchicago mirror (presumably).

Ignoring this message will mean your installation is always going to fail as 
the installer won't recognize your disk.

Missing installer modules probably means you are using an incorrect 
distribution on your mirror.
You probably need to select 'unstable' instead of using the default 'testing'.

You can do this by backing up to the menu (for example from country-chooser), 
changing debconf priority to medium, and then choose 'unstable' when you are 
selecting your mirror.

The reason is there are kernel-changes happening ATM and the version the 
floppies are build with is probably not yet available in testing.

Cheers,
Frans

P.S. When are you finally going to start work on the manual?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-10 Thread Rick Thomas
On Thursday, September 9, 2004, at 12:45 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 09:18 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 05:18 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
Please try again with todays floppies,
and if it doesn't fix the problem, we need to investigate what 
driver is
missing or something.
I'll try the new floppies tonight.
I guess whatever it was is fixed now.  Because I was able to 
download a set of floppies from

Index of /~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy-2.4
 NameLast modified   Size  Description

 Parent Directory26-Aug-2004 21:35  -
 asian-root.img  10-Sep-2004 05:46   1.2M
 boot.img10-Sep-2004 05:47   1.4M
 cd-drivers.img  10-Sep-2004 05:49   1.4M
 net-drivers.img 10-Sep-2004 05:50   1.4M
 ofonlyboot.img  10-Sep-2004 05:51   1.4M
 root-2.img  10-Sep-2004 05:52   1.4M
 root.img10-Sep-2004 05:53   1.3M

Apache/1.3.26 Server at people.debian.org Port 80
The "ofonlyboot" has not changed.  It reads and inverts the colors 
of the tuxmac, but never switches to text-mode screen from the 
inverted color tuxmac.

The boot floppy reads and switches to the text screen then asks for 
the root floppy, which it reads.  It then asks for language 
(English) and location (US) (but not keyboard layout) then invites 
me to load drivers from a floppy.  I gave it the "root-2" floppy 
and it complained about not being able to find any kernel drivers 
on that floppy.  I chose  and re-executed "load drivers 
from a floppy".  This time I gave it the net-drivers floppy, and it 
was happy.  Still thinking that we wouldn't get any where without 
the root-2 floppy loading (and being a bit bull headed anyway) I 
tried "load drivers from floppy" for the third time, and again fed 
it the root-2.  It complained again about not finding any kernel 
modules.  This time I told it to "continue without loading drivers" 
and to my amazement, it started decoding the stuff from the root-2 
floppy!  Curioser and curioser!

I think it was at this point that it asked for my keyboard layout, 
and suggested "European" as default, even though I had given it 
every reason to suspect that US-English was my preferred locale.  
I've reported this violation of the principle of least astonishment 
before.

It proceeded then to find my ethernet interface (remember I'd 
loaded the net-drivers floppy earlier) and do DHCP discovery on 
it.  This succeeded, as expected.  When it asked, I chose the 
uchicago mirror as usual, and it loaded the installer-components 
list (I think -- I didn't get the exact words) after which it 
*again* complained about not finding any kernel modules!  I told it 
to continue anyway, and it started downloading and unpacking 
installer components from the uchicago mirror (presumably).

When it got done with that and moved on to the partitioner, it 
couldn't find any of my disks (not my IDE main disk or my SCSI Zip 
disk).  The only IDE think it knew about was the CD-ROM drive.  
Exploring on the F2 console showed that it wasn't just the 
partitioner that was confused.  There was no evidence of IDE or 
SCSI disks in /proc or /dev.  (Same as last time -- no progress on 
that front...)

So I wrapped it up and took a tea break to write this report.
I have to consider the check for kernel modules at inappropriate 
times to be a serious bug...

Enjoy!
Rick

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 12:45:29PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 09:18 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
> 
> >
> >On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 05:18 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Please try again with todays floppies,
> >>and if it doesn't fix the problem, we need to investigate what 
> >>driver is
> >>missing or something.
> >
> >I'll try the new floppies tonight.
> 
> Ummm... The contents of
> 
>   http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy-2.4/
> 
> haven't changed in the last few days.  Is the build process stalled 
> somewhere?

[DIR] 2004-09-08_RSYNC_IN_PROGRESS/ 07-Sep-2004 22:05  -  
[DIR] 2004-09-09_RSYNC_IN_PROGRESS/ 08-Sep-2004 22:05  -  

Oh, well, i wonder what went wrong this time, let me look at the logs ...

... and here it is :

powerpc/floppy/root-2.img
powerpc/floppy/root.img
powerpc/netboot/2.4/initrd.gz
Read from remote host people.debian.org: Connection reset by peer
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes: phase "unknown": Broken pipe
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(839)
Thu Sep  9 05:27:09 UTC 2004

powerpc/cdrom/2.4/vmlinuz-chrp.initrd
powerpc/cdrom/2.4/vmlinuz-prep.initrd
Read from remote host people.debian.org: Connection reset by peer
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes: phase "unknown": Broken pipe
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(839)
Wed Sep  8 05:26:40 UTC 2004

Mmm, i wonder what is the problem here, anyone can help me out on this one ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-09 Thread Rick Thomas
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 09:18 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 05:18 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
Please try again with todays floppies,
and if it doesn't fix the problem, we need to investigate what 
driver is
missing or something.
I'll try the new floppies tonight.
Ummm... The contents of
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy-2.4/
haven't changed in the last few days.  Is the build process stalled 
somewhere?

Thanks!
Rick

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-08 Thread Rick Thomas
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 05:18 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 04:17:55AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
Package: installation-reports
powerpc boot-floppy 20040906 OldWorld PowerMac
...
Then I tried the "boot" floppy.  It gave me the tuxmac and made
reading noises.  After a while it ejected the boot floppy and switched
to a text mode screen at (I think) 640x480 resolution.  This is good
enough for installing -- but not satisfactory for long term usage.
Yes, i guess quik-installer should allow you to use further kernel 
options.
You could create your own miboot floppy, and then you can add the 
options you
want, more on this below.
For the time being, just adding "DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium" to the 
standard "boot" floppy would be a major good-thing.

Frankly, I think that "medium" priority would be acceptable as a 
default mode for floppy boots.  It's nice to minimize user 
interaction and all, but if I'm going to all the trouble of burning 
a bunch of floppies, I want a reasonable amount of control over the 
details of the installation process.  I don't think inexperienced 
users will find the "medium" priority dialogue any more confusing 
than the existing "woody" installer.  Just my opinion -- YMMV, of 
course.


It called for the root floppy, so I fed it that, which it read
happily.  After reading the root floppy and asking me some questions
about languages and locations, it asked if I wanted to read a driver
floppy.  I said yes and fed it the "root-2" floppy.
Well, i fixed the root-2 thingy earlier, so it is nice that it 
works, even if
there is no real support for this in the installer yet. Feel free to
participate in the fixing of this, be it only by suggesting what 
the root-2
asking question should be, and where it should be asked. Ideally 
we would add
a load-second-root-floppy .udeb, which would present a menu and 
load the
second floppy, and which would be part of the first root floppy.
A special "load-root-2.udeb" (or whatever) may not be necessary:  
Just think of everything after the "root" as "extra installer 
component" floppies (or some such) rather than "driver" floppies 
specifically.  Simply modify the existing dialogue to end with a 
question "Do you want to load another installer component?"  If the 
answer is "yes" loop back and re-execute.  If the answer is "no", 
make a normal return.  The first pass through is mandatory and 
loads the "root-2" floppy.  All subsequent passes are optional, 
based on what kind of installation you want to do.

One thing to be careful of:  It will be necessary to craft the 
wording of the dialogue questions very carefully so that the user 
understands fully what is going on, and what is required of them, 
at each step.

The root-2 floppy contains stuff (namely netcfg and co) that was 
spilled out
from the first root floppy.
That's pretty much what I figured was going on.

My choice of "root-2" at this point was based on a hunch.  There was
no indication of which driver floppy it was expecting (Indeed, it was
not clear at all that "root-2" was a "driver" floppy.  My hunch was
that it would be needed immediately and that the easiest way to add
files to the ram-disk root was to emulate a driver floppy.)  It would
be better to out-and-out say "root-2" if that's what is wanted.
Like Joeyh mentioned, right now there is support for loading only 
one drivers
floppy, which may well be buggy in itself, and maybe a question 
for asking for
an additional floppy like asking for additional apt sources later 
on may be
welcome. Also, the root-2 is not really a drivers floppy, but 
should be loaded
earlier on, maybe.
I have no problem with answering questions about language and 
location before loading additional installer components.  I'd go 
ahead and leave it right where it is in the sequence, if that's 
easiest.


It then tried to detect my network interface and failed, so it asked
Because the net drivers are not on the floppy.
for the network drivers floppy, which I gave it.  This time it
succeeded in finding my network interface and configured it via DHCP
Woaw. I was under the impression that this would fail, from 
joeyh's comment
about only one driver floppy, but this is great.
Right.  This is what makes me think we can use the existing 
framework to load an arbitrary number of extra "installer 
component" floppies.


(I would have preferred the option to do this manually, but there 
is no
way to specify "DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium" in booting an oldworld pmac
Like said, if you build your own miboot floppy, you can add any kernel
arguments you like. As miboot is non-free, users may be forced to 
do this
anyway, so ...
Yuch!  Please don't force inexperienced users to build their own 
"boot" floppy.  You'll loose a large class of potential users if 
you do.


machine from floppy.)  It asked for a mirror, and I specified the
uchicago one since it seems to be fastest and most reliable from my
little corner of the Internet.
Overcool.
Note 2:

Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-08 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 04:17:55AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>  
> powerpc boot-floppy 20040906 OldWorld PowerMac

Thanks for testing this.

> Note 1:
> 
> The "ofonlyboot" floppy booted and gave me the "tuxmac" icon in the
> middle of the screen.  After the floppy noises stopped, the screen
> inverted colors, but did not switch to text mode.  The ofonly boot
> floppy ejected.  Normally, at this point it's calling for the root
> floppy, so I gave it the root floppy and hit .  As expected,
> it read the root floppy, but the text screen never appeared -- just
> the inverted color tuxmac.  So it was impossible to proceed further
> with the "ofonlyboot" experiment.

Mmm.

> Then I tried the "boot" floppy.  It gave me the tuxmac and made
> reading noises.  After a while it ejected the boot floppy and switched
> to a text mode screen at (I think) 640x480 resolution.  This is good
> enough for installing -- but not satisfactory for long term usage.

Yes, i guess quik-installer should allow you to use further kernel options.
You could create your own miboot floppy, and then you can add the options you
want, more on this below.

> It called for the root floppy, so I fed it that, which it read
> happily.  After reading the root floppy and asking me some questions
> about languages and locations, it asked if I wanted to read a driver
> floppy.  I said yes and fed it the "root-2" floppy.

Well, i fixed the root-2 thingy earlier, so it is nice that it works, even if
there is no real support for this in the installer yet. Feel free to
participate in the fixing of this, be it only by suggesting what the root-2
asking question should be, and where it should be asked. Ideally we would add
a load-second-root-floppy .udeb, which would present a menu and load the
second floppy, and which would be part of the first root floppy.

The root-2 floppy contains stuff (namely netcfg and co) that was spilled out
from the first root floppy.

> My choice of "root-2" at this point was based on a hunch.  There was
> no indication of which driver floppy it was expecting (Indeed, it was
> not clear at all that "root-2" was a "driver" floppy.  My hunch was
> that it would be needed immediately and that the easiest way to add
> files to the ram-disk root was to emulate a driver floppy.)  It would
> be better to out-and-out say "root-2" if that's what is wanted.

Like Joeyh mentioned, right now there is support for loading only one drivers
floppy, which may well be buggy in itself, and maybe a question for asking for
an additional floppy like asking for additional apt sources later on may be
welcome. Also, the root-2 is not really a drivers floppy, but should be loaded
earlier on, maybe.

> It then tried to detect my network interface and failed, so it asked

Because the net drivers are not on the floppy.

> for the network drivers floppy, which I gave it.  This time it
> succeeded in finding my network interface and configured it via DHCP

Woaw. I was under the impression that this would fail, from joeyh's comment
about only one driver floppy, but this is great.

> (I would have preferred the option to do this manually, but there is no
> way to specify "DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium" in booting an oldworld pmac

Like said, if you build your own miboot floppy, you can add any kernel
arguments you like. As miboot is non-free, users may be forced to do this
anyway, so ...

> machine from floppy.)  It asked for a mirror, and I specified the
> uchicago one since it seems to be fastest and most reliable from my
> little corner of the Internet.

Overcool.

> Note 2:
> 
> Things proceeded more or less as expected until it came time to
> partition the disk.  The partitioner could not find any disks to
> partition!  Switching to the F2 console and poking about, it became
> clear that this was *not* just a problem with the partitioner -- the
> only ide device present, as far as the kernel was concerned, was the
> CD-ROM drive.  My IDE disk was nowhere to be found!  There was no
> "/dev/discs" directory, and there was just the CD-ROM drive in the
> /proc/ide directory.  Very strange!

There have been a few problems with partman lately, starting with the broken
no_media handling, and then following with the missing dependency of parted
1.6.11-2, which is fixed in 1.6.11-3. Please try again with todays floppies,
and if it doesn't fix the problem, we need to investigate what driver is
missing or something.

> Final note:
> 
> Throughout this process, except for once when it asked for the "root"
> floppy, it never ejected the previous floppy.  On a Mac, this means I
> have to manually eject the floppy with a bent paperclip.  Mac floppy
> drives do not have an "eject" button the way PC floppy drives do.
> This is annoying to experienced folks, and will be confusing to
> inexperienced users.

This is indeed a problem, and it may be worth to include the (small) eject
.udeb in the first root floppy, and add eject support in the 

Bug#270599: Floppy install on Oldworld PowerMac

2004-09-08 Thread Rick_Thomas
Package: installation-reports
 
powerpc boot-floppy 20040906 OldWorld PowerMac

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 

I got the floppy disk images from:

 Index of /~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy-2.4
 
 NameLast modified   Size  Description
   


 Parent Directory26-Aug-2004 21:35  -
 asian-root.img  06-Sep-2004 22:38   1.2M
 boot.img06-Sep-2004 22:38   1.4M
 cd-drivers.img  06-Sep-2004 22:39   1.4M
 net-drivers.img 06-Sep-2004 22:39   1.4M
 ofonlyboot.img  06-Sep-2004 22:39   1.4M
 root-2.img  06-Sep-2004 22:41   1.4M
 root.img06-Sep-2004 22:42   1.3M
   

Apache/1.3.26 Server at people.debian.org Port 80


uname -a: 

Linux debian 2.6.7-powerpc #1 Thu Aug 5 23:48:59 CEST 2004 ppc
GNU/Linux


Date: 

4 AM (UTC) 2004-09-07


Method:
How did you install?

boot/root/driver floppies with an assist from the uchicago mirror

What did you boot off?

boot floppy

If network install, from where?

debian.uchicago.edu

Proxied?

No


Machine: 

PowerMac G3/300 MHz

Processor:

processor   : 0
cpu : 740/750
temperature : 36-41 C (uncalibrated)
clock   : 300MHz
revision: 2.2 (pvr 0008 0202)
bogomips: 601.29
machine : Power Macintosh
motherboard : AAPL,Gossamer MacRISC
detected as : 48 (PowerMac G3 (Gossamer))
pmac flags  : 
L2 cache: 1024K unified pipelined-syncro-burst
memory  : 384MB
pmac-generation : OldWorld



Memory:

384 MB


Root Device: 

Didn't get that far

Root Size/partition table:  Feel free to paste the full partition
  table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.



Output of lspci and lspci -n:

:00:00.0 Host bridge: Motorola MPC106 [Grackle] (rev 40)
:00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc RTL8139 Ethernet
(rev 10)
:00:0e.0 SCSI storage controller: Artop Electronic Corp ATP865
(rev 06)
:00:0f.0 PCI bridge: Hint Corp HB6 Universal PCI-PCI bridge
(non-transparent mode) (rev 13)
:00:10.0 ff00: Apple Computer Inc. Heathrow Mac I/O (rev 01)
:00:12.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage
I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (rev 9a)
:01:08.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
:01:08.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
:01:08.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 02)
:01:0b.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB12LV26
IEEE-1394 Controller (Link)

:00:00.0 0600: 1057:0002 (rev 40)
:00:0d.0 0200: 1186:1300 (rev 10)
:00:0e.0 0100: 1191:0009 (rev 06)
:00:0f.0 0604: 3388:0021 (rev 13)
:00:10.0 ff00: 106b:0010 (rev 01)
:00:12.0 0300: 1002:4754 (rev 9a)
:01:08.0 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 41)
:01:08.1 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 41)
:01:08.2 0c03: 1033:00e0 (rev 02)
:01:0b.0 0c00: 104c:8020



Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[?] Note 1 
Configure network HW:   [o]
Config network: [o]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [o]
Detect hard drives: [e] Note 2
Partition hard drives:  [?]
Create file systems:[ ]
Mount partitions:   [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]

Comments/Problems:



Note 1:

The "ofonlyboot" floppy booted and gave me the "tuxmac" icon in the
middle of the screen.  After the floppy noises stopped, the screen
inverted colors, but did not switch to text mode.  The ofonly boot
floppy ejected.  Normally, at this point it's calling for the root
floppy, so I gave it the root floppy and hit .  As expected,
it read the root floppy, but the text screen never appeared -- just
the inverted color tuxmac.  So it was impossible to proceed further
with the "ofonlyboot" experiment.

Then I tried the "boot" floppy.  It gave me the tuxmac and made
reading noises.  After a while it ejected the boot floppy and switched
to a text mode screen at (I think) 640x480 resolution.  This is good
enough for installing -- but not satisfactory for long term usage.

It called for the root floppy, so I fed it that, which it read
happily.  After reading the root floppy and asking me some questions
about languages and locations, it asked if I wanted to read a driver
floppy.  I said yes and fed it the "root-2" floppy.

My choice of "root-2" at this point was based on a hunch.  There was
no indication of which driver floppy it was expecting (Indeed, it was
not clear at all that "root-2" was a "driver" floppy.  My hunch was
that it would b

  1   2   >