Bug#712180: ircd-hybrid: configuration issues with ircd-hybrid ver 8

2013-06-13 Thread Mitch Halmu
Package: ircd-hybrid
Version: 1:8.0.9.dfsg.1-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

There are several issues with configuring ircd-hybrid in the new ver 8 release.
As packaged, in /etc/ircd-hybrid/ircd.conf there is an error on line 108:

max_topic_length = 350

This should read:

max_topic_length = 300;

Range is 80 to 300, and it's missing the semicolon, which produces the error:

[2013-06-13T17:40:16-0400] "/etc/ircd-hybrid/ircd.conf", line 109: syntax 
error: };

Provide /etc/ircd-hybrid/kline.conf and dline.conf files to avoid errors:

[2013-06-13T17:40:16-0400] Unable to read configuration file 
'/etc/ircd-hybrid/kline.conf': No such file or directory
[2013-06-13T17:40:16-0400] Unable to read configuration file 
'/etc/ircd-hybrid/dline.conf': No such file or directory

Password for operator is not recognized when using the system mkpasswd.
There is no other "provided mkpasswd tool" as commented in ircd.conf (tried
/usr/bin/mkpasswd with no option and with md5, but the password hash it produces
is apparently not compatible). The help file 
/usr/share/ircd-hybrid/help/opers/mkpasswd is 
also missing from this version.

Having /oper privileges on your own irc server is obviously a pressing issue. 
If this cannot be fixed, the package cannot be safely deployed and maintained.

Not sure what is wrong with this:

[2013-06-13T17:40:16-0400] "/etc/ircd-hybrid/ircd.conf", line 117: syntax 
error:  email = "";

Error persists even when changing the localhost address to a valid domain value.

Cheers,

Mitch Halmu

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 
'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)

Kernel: Linux 3.8-1-sparc64-smp (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages ircd-hybrid depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.50
ii  libc6  2.17-3
ii  libltdl7   2.4.2-1.2
ii  libpcre3   1:8.31-2

Versions of packages ircd-hybrid recommends:
ii  whois  5.0.25

Versions of packages ircd-hybrid suggests:
pn  hybserv  

-- debconf information:
  ircd-hybrid/restart_on_upgrade: true
  ircd-hybrid/upgrade_secure_links_warn: true
* ircd-hybrid/upgrade_no_services_warn: true
  ircd-hybrid/no-more-ssl: true


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#710677: [php5] Call to undefined function json_decode()/json_encode()

2013-06-08 Thread Mitch Halmu
As a follow-up for package php5-json not found for architecture sparc,
I built from source:

=
PHP : /usr/bin/php
PHP_SAPI: cli
PHP_VERSION : 5.5.0RC2
ZEND_VERSION: 2.5.0-dev
PHP_OS  : Linux - Linux debian-v240 3.8-1-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Debian
3.8.12-1 sparc64
INI actual  : /var/tmp/php-json/tmp-php.ini
More .INIs  :
CWD : /var/tmp/php-json
Extra dirs  :
VALGRIND: Not used
=
TIME START 2013-06-09 02:45:40
=



=
TIME END 2013-06-09 02:45:45

=
TEST RESULT SUMMARY
-
Exts skipped:0
Exts tested :   43
-

Number of tests :   4945
Tests skipped   :4 (  8.2%) 
Tests warned:0 (  0.0%) (  0.0%)
Tests failed:1 (  2.0%) (  2.2%)
Expected fail   :4 (  8.2%) (  8.9%)
Tests passed:   40 ( 81.6%) ( 88.9%)
-
Time taken  :5 seconds
=

=
EXPECTED FAILED TEST SUMMARY
-
json_last_error() tests [tests/007.phpt]  XFAIL REASON: Different parser,
so different error codes.
json_decode() with large integers [tests/008.phpt]  XFAIL REASON: Large
number always treat as integer.
Bug #42090 (json_decode causes segmentation fault) [tests/bug42090.phpt]
XFAIL REASON: New parser is less strict, produce different result, but
don't crash.
JSON (http://www.crockford.com/JSON/JSON_checker/test/fail*.json)
[tests/fail001.phpt]  XFAIL REASON: New parser is less strict, produce
different result, but don't crash.
=

=
FAILED TEST SUMMARY
-
JSON (http://www.crockford.com/JSON/JSON_checker/test/pass1.json)
[tests/pass001.1.phpt]
=

You may have found a problem in PHP.




Installing and using extension=json.so in php.ini works for CLI and
apache2. Nevertheless, having a sparc package in the repo like it is
available for other platforms would be nice.

Cheers,

Mitch Halmu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#710677: [php5] Call to undefined function json_decode()/json_encode()

2013-06-08 Thread Mitch Halmu
Dear Maintainer,

While it is my understanding that package php5-json will provide the
missing json.so shared library extension, this package is not available
for architecture sparc:

# apt-get install php5-json
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package php5-json is a virtual package provided by:
  php5-common 5.4.4-15 [Not candidate version]

E: Package 'php5-json' has no installation candidate
# dpkg -l|grep php5-common
ii  php5-common5.5.0~rc2+dfsg-2
sparcCommon files for packages built from the php5 source
# php --version
PHP 5.5.0RC2 (cli) (built: Jun  3 2013 10:50:14)
Copyright (c) 1997-2013 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.5.0-dev, Copyright (c) 1998-2013 Zend Technologies
with Zend OPcache v7.0.2-dev, Copyright (c) 1999-2013, by Zend
Technologies
# php -r 'json_decode ("{}");'
PHP Fatal error:  Call to undefined function json_decode() in Command line
code on line 1

This is the newly upgraded php5 version without json support, which broke
quite a few S/W packages that use php json calls. Will a port for sparc be
made available in the repos, or do we need to compile our own packages
from source?

Cheers,

Mitch Halmu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#707833: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#707833: package linux-image-3.8-1-sparc64-smp not found)

2013-05-15 Thread Mitch Halmu
Ben Hutchings wrote:

> Please don't open bugs on 'missing' packages that are just waiting for
> the auto-builder.  They are just a waste of maintainers' time.

When a kernel package for a specific platform disappears entirely from
repositories for 10 days (May 6 to May 16), it's not a trivial event.

There was no 3.8 Linux kernel whatsoever to be had for sparc at all - no
such package existed as far as the system was concerned. If this is a
normal occurrence and business-as-usual at Debian, then please forgive me
for wasting your time...

--Mitch


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#707833: package linux-image-3.8-1-sparc64-smp not found

2013-05-15 Thread Mitch Halmu
The package finally made it into the Debian sid repo, and I was able to
install it successfully:

# cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.8-1-sparc64-smp (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc
version 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-3) ) #1 SMP Debian 3.8.12-1

This log of removals extract from ftp-master.debian.org indicates when the
old version was deleted:

=
[Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 09:39:45 +] [ftpmaster: Ansgar Burchardt]
Removed the following packages from experimental:

linux-image-3.8-trunk-sparc64-smp | 3.8.5-1~experimental.1 | sparc

--- Reason ---
[auto-cruft] NVIU
--
=

Unfortunately, a newer version was not available in unstable, due to the
failed build of Linux ver 3.8.11-1 for sparc.

This issue is now resolved.

Cheers,

Mitch Halmu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#707833: package linux-image-3.8-1-sparc64-smp not found

2013-05-14 Thread Mitch Halmu
Further research shows that the missing package is due to a failed build,
as indicated in the log summary:

Architecture: sparc
Build-Space: 2354436
Build-Time: 57001
Distribution: sid
Fail-Stage: build
Install-Time: 148
Job: linux_3.8.11-1
Package: linux
Package-Time: 57531
Source-Version: 3.8.11-1
Space: 2354436
Status: attempted
Version: 3.8.11-1
Finished at 20130507-0033
Build needed 15:58:51, 2354436k disc space

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux&arch=sparc&ver=3.8.11-1&stamp=1367886856

It seems a new version build just completed successfully today:

Architecture: sparc
Build-Space: 2463108
Build-Time: 16378
Distribution: sid
Install-Time: 123
Job: linux_3.8.12-1
Package: linux
Package-Time: 16653
Source-Version: 3.8.12-1
Space: 2463108
Status: successful
Version: 3.8.12-1
Finished at 20130514-1023
Build needed 04:37:33, 2463108k disc space
Signature with key 'B3666332' requested:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux&arch=sparc&ver=3.8.12-1&stamp=1368527113

I presume it's just a matter of time before the package shows up
in the sid repo.

Cheers,

Mitch Halmu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#707833: Acknowledgement (package linux-image-3.8-1-sparc64-smp not found)

2013-05-13 Thread Mitch Halmu
Regarding the situation with kernel 3.8 for sparc no longer found in
the Debian repositories, please clarify if Jurij Smakov resigning as
sparc port maintainer is pertinent:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2013/05/msg8.html

In any event, even if it is no longer being maintained, an important
package should not be pulled without warning.

Cheers,

Mitch Halmu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#707833: package linux-image-3.8-1-sparc64-smp not found

2013-05-11 Thread Mitch Halmu
Package: linux-image-3.8-1-sparc64-smp
Version: 3.8-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

Linux kernel ver 3.8 for sparc64-smp is no longer available in any
Debian repositories:

# apt-get install linux-image-sparc64-smp
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 linux-image-sparc64-smp : Depends: linux-image-3.8-1-sparc64-smp but it is not 
installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
# apt-get install linux-image-3.8-1-sparc64-smp
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Package linux-image-3.8-1-sparc64-smp is not available, but is referred to by 
another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

E: Package 'linux-image-3.8-1-sparc64-smp' has no installation candidate

The 3.8 kernel package for sparc was also known by the name
linux-image-3.8-trunk-sparc64-smp in experimental. Searching on
Google still shows stale links that refer to this package.
What happened?

Cheers,

Mitch Halmu

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 
'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-sparc64-smp (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

# cat /proc/cpuinfo
cpu : TI UltraSparc IIIi (Jalapeno)
fpu : UltraSparc IIIi integrated FPU
pmu : ultra3i
prom: OBP 4.22.33 2007/06/18 12:45
type: sun4u
ncpus probed: 2
ncpus active: 2
D$ parity tl1   : 0
I$ parity tl1   : 0
cpucaps : flush,stbar,swap,muldiv,v9,ultra3,mul32,div32,v8plus,vis,vis2
Cpu0ClkTck  : 4c4b4000
Cpu1ClkTck  : 4c4b4000
MMU Type: Cheetah+
State:
CPU0:   online
CPU1:   online


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#705513: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#705513: openssl 1.0.1e-2 throws SIGKILL on Debian 7.0 sparc

2013-04-16 Thread Mitch Halmu
Sorry about the typo, it's SIGILL. I have used the debugger to identify
the problem. The compiled application itself throws a Bus error when
running. In strace:

--- SIGBUS (Bus error) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGBUS +++
Bus error

The fact remains this bug was introduced in later versions of openssl, and
causes problems with applications that previously worked fine on sparc.

--Mitch

On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Kurt Roeckx wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Mitch Halmu wrote:
> > Package: openssl
> > Version: 1.0.1e-2
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: upstream
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > openssl 1.0.1e-2 throws SIGKILL on Debian 7.0 sparc. This may be related
> > to Bug #2553 SIGKILL on sparc64 (linux/solaris) reported on openssl.org:
>
> That would be SIGILL, not SIGKILL
>
> > http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2553
>
> >From what I understand this is normal and expected behaviour, and
> you only see this when using a debugger that catches it the
> signal?
>
> Can't you just continue?
>
>
> Kurt
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#705513: openssl 1.0.1e-2 throws SIGKILL on Debian 7.0 sparc

2013-04-15 Thread Mitch Halmu
Package: openssl
Version: 1.0.1e-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream

Dear Maintainer,

openssl 1.0.1e-2 throws SIGKILL on Debian 7.0 sparc. This may be related
to Bug #2553 SIGKILL on sparc64 (linux/solaris) reported on openssl.org:

http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2553

Locally compiled program debug info:

(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/bitcoind 
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/sparc-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/sparc-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.17-gdb.py", 
line 62, in 
from libstdcxx.v6.printers import register_libstdcxx_printers
ImportError: No module named libstdcxx.v6.printers

Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
0xf7b7cfdc in _sparcv9_fmadd_probe () at sparccpuid.S:312
312 sparccpuid.S: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0  0xf7b7cfdc in _sparcv9_fmadd_probe () at sparccpuid.S:312
#1  0xf7b7cc54 in OPENSSL_cpuid_setup () at sparcv9cap.c:227
#2  0xf7b78458 in _init () at sparccpuid.S:402
#3  0xf7fd920c in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#4  0xf7fd920c in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb) 

This bug on sparc is also discussed at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-users@openssl.org/msg70396.html

Cheers,

Mitch Halmu

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 
'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-sparc64-smp (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages openssl depends on:
ii  libc62.13-38
ii  libssl1.0.0  1.0.1e-2
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

openssl recommends no packages.

Versions of packages openssl suggests:
ii  ca-certificates  20130119

-- no debconf information

# cat /proc/cpuinfo
cpu : TI UltraSparc IIIi (Jalapeno)
fpu : UltraSparc IIIi integrated FPU
pmu : ultra3i
prom: OBP 4.22.33 2007/06/18 12:45
type: sun4u
ncpus probed: 2
ncpus active: 2
D$ parity tl1   : 0
I$ parity tl1   : 0
cpucaps : flush,stbar,swap,muldiv,v9,ultra3,mul32,div32,v8plus,vis,vis2
Cpu0ClkTck  : 4c4b4000
Cpu1ClkTck  : 4c4b4000
MMU Type: Cheetah+
State:
CPU0:   online
CPU1:   online
# openssl version
OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013
# dpkg -l|egrep 'libssl1|libcrypto'
ii  libcrypto++9  5.6.1-6
sparcGeneral purpose cryptographic library - shared library
ii  libssl1.0.0:sparc 1.0.1e-2   
sparcSSL shared libraries
ii  libssl1.0.0-dbg:sparc 1.0.1e-2   
sparcSymbol tables for libssl and libcrypto
# dpkg -l|egrep 'libssl-dev|openssl'
ii  libssl-dev1.0.1e-2   
sparcSSL development libraries, header files and documentation
ii  openssl   1.0.1e-2   
sparcSecure Socket Layer (SSL) binary and related cryptographic tools


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#704757: [Openstack-devel] Bug#704757: novnc 04.+dfsg+1-6 conflicts with websockify 0.3.0-1

2013-04-05 Thread Mitch Halmu
Thanks for working on it, zigo. I subscribed to the list, and now
understand where to submit bug reports for bleeding-edge OpenStack
Debian packages.

Regarding the proposed OpenStack 2013.1-1 install, the Debian host is
now running the 3.8 experimental kernel with upgraded system packages
from the sid and experimental repos. The initial DevStack deployment was
on Debian running the 3.2 wheezy kernel at the time. I placed a note on
the web site to clarify this.

I prefer upgrading to re-imaging Linux whenever possible. It worked on
Debian and CentOS on this dual-boot x86_64 host, and I was able to
upgrade Debian squeeze from a 2.6 to a wheezy/sid 3.2 kernel and
system packages on sparc64-smp.

Best regards,

Mitch Halmu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#704751: Acknowledgement (nova-consoleauth 2013.1-1 conflict with nova-console 2013.1-1)

2013-04-05 Thread Mitch Halmu
Maintainer for nova-consoleauth 2013.1-1 in the gplhost.com repo may be
PKG OpenStack 

Cheers,

Mitch Halmu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#704757: novnc 04.+dfsg+1-6 conflicts with websockify 0.3.0-1

2013-04-05 Thread Mitch Halmu
Package: novnc
Version: 0.4+dfsg+1-6
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

novnc 04.+dfsg+1-6 conflicts with websockify 0.3.0-1

# apt-get install novnc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  novnc
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 13 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/155 kB of archives.
After this operation, 446 kB of additional disk space will be used.
(Reading database ... 282765 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking novnc (from .../novnc_1%3a0.4+dfsg+1-6_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/novnc_1%3a0.4+dfsg+1-6_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/rebind', which is also in package websockify 
0.3.0-1
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/novnc_1%3a0.4+dfsg+1-6_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
# ls -l /usr/bin/rebind
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 424 Jan 15 12:49 /usr/bin/rebind
# dpkg -l|egrep 'websockify|python-nova'
ii  python-nova   2013.1-1   
all  OpenStack Compute - libraries
ii  python-novaclient 2:2.12.0-1 
all  client library for OpenStack Compute API
ii  websockify0.3.0-1
amd64WebSockets support for any application/server

websockify is a dependency for python-nova. Packages retrieved from the
gplhost.com grizzly repo. Trying to install OpenStack Grizzly with .deb
packages on Debian 3.8 experimental, following the DevStack model.

More information on http://debian.netside.net/xps13_openstack.html

Cheers,

Mitch Halmu

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 
'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.8-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages novnc depends on:
ii  adduser   3.113+nmu3
ii  dpkg  1.16.10
ii  libc6 2.13-38
ii  python2.7.3-4
ii  python-nova   2013.1-1
ii  python-novnc  1:0.4+dfsg+1-6
ii  python-numpy  1:1.6.2-1.2
ii  websockify0.3.0-1

novnc recommends no packages.

novnc suggests no packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#704751: nova-consoleauth 2013.1-1 conflict with nova-console 2013.1-1

2013-04-05 Thread Mitch Halmu
Package: nova-consoleauth
Version: 2013.1-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

nova-consoleauth 2013.1-1 conflicts with nova-console 2013.1-1

# apt-get install nova-consoleauth
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  nova-consoleauth
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 13 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/1,407 kB of archives.
After this operation, 1,455 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously unselected package nova-consoleauth.
(Reading database ... 282791 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking nova-consoleauth (from .../nova-consoleauth_2013.1-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/nova-consoleauth_2013.1-1_all.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/etc/init.d/nova-consoleauth', which is also in package 
nova-console 2013.1-1
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/nova-consoleauth_2013.1-1_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
# dpkg -l|grep nova-console
ii  nova-console  2013.1-1   
all  OpenStack Compute - console
ic  nova-consoleauth  2013.1-1   
all  OpenStack Compute - Console Authenticator
# ls -l /etc/init.d/nova-console*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3186 Apr  4 12:09 /etc/init.d/nova-console
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3224 Apr  4 12:09 /etc/init.d/nova-consoleauth

Packages retrieved from the gplhost.com grizzly repo. Trying to
install OpenStack Grizzly with packages on Debian 3.8 experimental, 
following the DevStack model.

More information on http://debian.netside.net/xps13_openstack.html

Best regards,

--Mitch Halmu

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 
'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.8-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages nova-consoleauth depends on:
ii  dpkg 1.16.10
ii  lsb-base 4.1+Debian9
ii  nova-common  2013.1-1
ii  python   2.7.3-4

nova-consoleauth recommends no packages.

nova-consoleauth suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/init.d/nova-consoleauth changed:
PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin
DESC="OpenStack Compute Console Auth"
NAME=nova-consoleauth
DAEMON=/usr/bin/nova-consoleauth
DAEMON_ARGS="--config-file=/etc/nova/nova.conf"
PIDFILE=/var/run/$NAME.pid
SCRIPTNAME=/etc/init.d/$NAME
NOVA_USER=nova
LOCK_DIR=/var/lock/nova/
DEFAULTS_FILE=/etc/default/nova-common
[ -x $DAEMON ] || exit 0
mkdir -p ${LOCK_DIR}
chown ${NOVA_USER} ${LOCK_DIR}
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
if [ -s $DEFAULTS_FILE ]; then
. $DEFAULTS_FILE
case "x$NOVA_ENABLE" in
xtrue|xfalse)   ;;
*)  log_failure_msg "Value of NOVA_ENABLE in $DEFAULTS_FILE 
must be either 'true' or 'false';"
log_failure_msg "not starting $NAME daemon."
exit 1
;;
esac
fi
do_start()
{
start-stop-daemon --start --background --quiet --chuid 
${NOVA_USER}:nova --make-pidfile --pidfile $PIDFILE --startas $DAEMON --test > 
/dev/null \
|| return 1
start-stop-daemon --start --background --quiet --chuid 
${NOVA_USER}:nova --make-pidfile --pidfile $PIDFILE --startas $DAEMON -- \
$DAEMON_ARGS \
|| return 2
}
do_stop()
{
start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --retry=TERM/30/KILL/5 --pidfile 
$PIDFILE
RETVAL="$?"
rm -f $PIDFILE
return "$RETVAL"
}
case "$1" in
  start)
if "$NOVA_ENABLE"; then
log_daemon_msg "Starting $DESC" "$NAME"
do_start
case "$?" in
0|1) log_end_msg 0 ;;
2) log_end_msg 1 ;;
esac
else
log_warning_msg "nova daemons not enabled in $DEFAULTS_FILE, not 
starting..."
fi
;;
  stop)
log_daemon_msg "Stopping $DESC" "$NAME"
do_stop
case "$?" in
0|1) log_end_msg 0 ;;
2) log_end_msg 1 ;;
esac
;;
  status)
   status_of_proc "$DAEMON" "$NAME" && exit 0 || exit $?
   ;;
  restart|force-reload)
if "$NOVA_ENABLE"; then
log_daemon_msg "Restarting $DESC" "$NAME"
do_stop
case "