Bug#881564: A64-OLinuXino
I built the version of the package on experimental with the patch on message #10. Then I installed it and the ATF from atf-allwinner package to a SD card using "TARGET=/usr/lib/u-boot/a64-olinuxino u-boot-install-sunxi64 /dev/mmcblk1". With that SD card on the board I got an U-Boot prompt and managed to boot into debian-installer using the daily kernel and initrd. >From that prompt I also managed to boot the Ubuntu installation on the internal eMMC, and everything seemed to work there. On the U-Boot prompt neither ethernet nor USB work: > => dhcp > No ethernet found. > => usb start > starting USB... > No controllers found All of this was tested over the serial port, I haven't tested the HDMI output, nor do I know if it is expected to work. Even though USB and ethernet are not working I would say the image is useful enough that it should be included.
Bug#881564: A64-OLinuXino
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > It's more than just a one-time test needed; someone needs to be willing > to test new versions periodically, so we don't end up with an unusable > u-boot installed on someone's machine in a stable release. > > For more information about being a tester, please see: > > https://wiki.debian.org/U-boot > https://wiki.debian.org/U-boot/Status > > Most important is to run the tests with the default u-boot environment, > otherwise you can end up with bugs leftover from older versions. For > this reason, I avoid using saveenv from the u-boot prompt. Ideally also > testing both a cold boot as well as reboot, and if possible various boot > methods. You would also kind of serve as a point of contact to help > troubleshoot issues with u-boot. I don't have much experience with u-boot, but I'm willing to learn and test new versions. > If you're up for doing that and having your name and email in the > debian/targets file listed with whatever board(s) you're willing to > test, reply to the bug and I'll add it to the next upload! Sure, no problem.
Bug#881564: A64-OLinuXino
Hello, I just got an A64-OLinuXino and would like to get Debian working on it. It seems to be that getting u-boot-sunxi to ship a version for this board is the first step. It seems this bug is on hold because there is no one available to test it. Is there anything I can do to help with that?
Bug#759003: Syzygy considerations
Package: stockfish Version: 5.0.dd+git20140823-1 >* I am considering moving to the sources with Syzygy tablebases. If > anybody has an opinion on that matter file a bug with explanation. The current syzygy code has some portability issues, and it will probably be merged in upstream after those are fixed. [1] [1] https://groups.google.com/d/topic/fishcooking/Db10mkxo2-E/discussion -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#756546: Stockfish 5 is available
Package: stockfish Version: 4.0.dd+git20140122-1 The new upstream version Stockfish 5 has been released in late May [1], please consider packaging it for jessie. [1] http://blog.stockfishchess.org/post/87376326602/stockfish-5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#734456: RFS: stockfish -- new version
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, the package stockfish has been outdated in Debian for five months, since version 4 was released in August. I reported a bug about this in November (#730504), and there has been no reply from the maintainer since then. I went ahead and updated the package to the latest upstream version, and also fixed another bug that was reported in November (#728920). I have uploaded the package to mentors.debian.net. * Package name: stockfish Version : 4+dd-1 Upstream Author : Marco Costalba * URL : http://stockfishchess.org/ * License : GPLv3 Section : games It builds those binary packages: stockfish - strong chess engine, to play chess against To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/stockfish Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stockfish/stockfish_4+dd-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * Upstream version DD. (Closes: #730504) * Fix binary path on polyglot.ini. (Closes: #728920) Regards, -- Rodrigo Exterckötter Tjäder -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#647706: Any news on this bug?
This bug persists on icedtea-web version 1.2-2. Is there anything I can do to help find the root of the problem? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#623737: Allow install mplayer2 and mplayer together.
2011/11/4 Reinhard Tartler : > On Fr, Nov 04, 2011 at 15:52:10 (CET), Rodrigo Exterckötter Tjäder wrote: > >> Perhaps it would also be good if mplayer and mplayer2 used the >> alternatives system so that both could provide the mplayer binary? > > The two projects are not strictly command line compatible and also the > config is AFAIUI only mostly the same. So sharing the same config may > work for many cases. > > Anyway, since upstream is going to rename the binary and the config > files at some point anyway, I don't see much point in implementing > alternatives. I don't think they need to be command-line compatible in order to be alternatives, see editor or x-www-browser, for example. Their configurations should still be kept separated. The main usefulness I see is to make scripts and other stuff that run "mplayer" work whether you have mplayer, mplayer2 or both installed without editing the script or making a symlink by hand. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#623737: Allow install mplayer2 and mplayer together.
Perhaps it would also be good if mplayer and mplayer2 used the alternatives system so that both could provide the mplayer binary? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#596680: Bug #596680 doesn't work with systemd
I'm getting that same failed assertion on plymouth 0.8.3-18+b1 and systemd 29-1. -- Rodrigo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557756: gnugo: load command ignores last character
Package: gnugo Version: 3.8-2 Severity: normal The load command in gnugo ignores the last character of the supplied filename, so that in order to load 'game.sgf' you have to input something like 'game.sgfx'. Here's an abridged session showing the bug: $ ls *.sgf game.sgf $ gnugo black(1): load game.sgf Cannot open or parse 'game.sg' black(1): load game.sgfx #loads game.sgf correctly and prints the board -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gnugo depends on: ii libc6 2.10.2-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libncurses5 5.7+20090803-2 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline6 6.0-5 GNU readline and history libraries gnugo recommends no packages. Versions of packages gnugo suggests: pn cgoban | qgo (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
