Bug#1000336: numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10
Hi Diane On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 05:39, Diane Trout wrote: > It would... except numpy 1.22 just hit experimental on the 18th. and > numba isn't compatible with numpy 1.22. I tried adding this to > d/control, > > python3-numpy (<< 1.22), > > but my sbuild resolver still picked up numpy from experimental and > refused to build. That doesn't sound right. You should be targeting experimental, but still building against packages in unstable. Something like this: sbuild -d experimental -c unstable-amd64-sbuild ... Regards Graham
Bug#1000336: numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10
On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 11:02 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: > Source: numba > Followup-For: Bug #1000336 > > onetbb is now building (in experimental) for all arches except > armel and armhf. > > Is it worth at this point to make an upload of numba 0.55 to > experimental to check that it's building and passing tests for the > other arches? It would... except numpy 1.22 just hit experimental on the 18th. and numba isn't compatible with numpy 1.22. I tried adding this to d/control, python3-numpy (<< 1.22), but my sbuild resolver still picked up numpy from experimental and refused to build. Upstream has a meta bug with the numpy 1.22 issues. https://github.com/numba/numba/issues/7754
Bug#1000336: numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10
Source: numba Followup-For: Bug #1000336 onetbb is now building (in experimental) for all arches except armel and armhf. Is it worth at this point to make an upload of numba 0.55 to experimental to check that it's building and passing tests for the other arches? Drew
Bug#1000336: numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10
On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 22:24 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Upstream has mentioned that it has been fixed upstream. Diane, could > you > please do the needful and upload? > > Actually because of the current state of numba, several reverse > depends are FTBFS so it's > bit urgent to push. Apologies for getting on your nerves, though. I tried. but numba needs tbb version >= 2021. I tried to update tbb but ran into problems trying to build it. I pushed the compatibility patch to a python-3-10-compatibility branch on salsa for the moment. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1000336: numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10
Hi all, On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:56:49 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote: > dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild > I: pybuild base:237: python3.10 setup.py clean > ... > from distutils import sysconfig > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/build/numba-0.54.1/setup.py", line 51, in > _guard_py_ver() > File "/build/numba-0.54.1/setup.py", line 48, in _guard_py_ver > raise RuntimeError(msg.format(cur_py, min_py, max_py)) > RuntimeError: Cannot install on Python version 3.10.1; only versions > >=3.7,<3.10 are supported. > E: pybuild pybuild:354: clean: plugin distutils failed with: exit code=1: > python3.10 setup.py clean > > > Hoping for an upstream fix of #7562 in their tracker now. Upstream has mentioned that it has been fixed upstream. Diane, could you please do the needful and upload? Actually because of the current state of numba, several reverse depends are FTBFS so it's bit urgent to push. Apologies for getting on your nerves, though. Regards, Nilesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1000336: numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10
Hi, I've commited version 0.54.1 to Git since I assume that we have better chances for Python3.10 support in the more recent upstream version. Unfortunately the build stops with dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild I: pybuild base:237: python3.10 setup.py clean ... from distutils import sysconfig Traceback (most recent call last): File "/build/numba-0.54.1/setup.py", line 51, in _guard_py_ver() File "/build/numba-0.54.1/setup.py", line 48, in _guard_py_ver raise RuntimeError(msg.format(cur_py, min_py, max_py)) RuntimeError: Cannot install on Python version 3.10.1; only versions >=3.7,<3.10 are supported. E: pybuild pybuild:354: clean: plugin distutils failed with: exit code=1: python3.10 setup.py clean Hoping for an upstream fix of #7562 in their tracker now. I think pushing for Python3.10 in Debian before such packages with lots of rdepends (specifically python3-pandas) are ported is quite demanding. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#1000336: numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10
Thanks for the bug report and the forward, I'd managed to spot the build failures last night but only read the log files about why today. I subscribed to the upstream bug report. Diane On Sun, 2021-11-21 at 15:55 -0400, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Source: numba > Version: 0.52.0-5 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs upstream > Justification: FTBFS > Forwarded: https://github.com/numba/numba/issues/7562 > > numba isn't compatible with Python 3.10, yet. > Upstream is working on it, see > https://github.com/numba/numba/issues/7562 > > setup.py immediately fails with: > RuntimeError: Cannot install on Python version 3.10.0; only versions > >=3.6,<3.10 are supported. > > See e.g. > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=numba=amd64=0.52.0-5%2Bb1=1637478629=0 > > SR >
Bug#1000336: numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10
Source: numba Version: 0.52.0-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs upstream Justification: FTBFS Forwarded: https://github.com/numba/numba/issues/7562 numba isn't compatible with Python 3.10, yet. Upstream is working on it, see https://github.com/numba/numba/issues/7562 setup.py immediately fails with: RuntimeError: Cannot install on Python version 3.10.0; only versions >=3.6,<3.10 are supported. See e.g. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=numba=amd64=0.52.0-5%2Bb1=1637478629=0 SR
