Bug#260740: Still interested in SExtractor?

2005-10-07 Thread Justin Pryzby 
I figured out that uploaders is in ./debian/control, because vim
highlighted it as a recognized field :)

An updated package is available at:
  http://justinpryzby.com/astro/code/sextractor/

pbuilder and lintian clean.

You can test it with one of the .FIT files from my website, using (for
example) the saods9 package (maintained by me).

Thanks!
Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#260740: Still interested in SExtractor?

2005-10-07 Thread Florian Ernst 
Hello again,

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:05:35AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
 An updated package is available at:
   http://justinpryzby.com/astro/code/sextractor/

Some comments on your packaging:

- the clean target in debian/rules depends on the config.status
  target? I see no reason for doing so, so I removed that dependancy,
  please see the attached interdiff for details
- the CFLAGS you set in debian/rules are not honoured by the program,
  so it will be compiled with upstream's standard compiler flags,
  including -O3 which is known to cause some issues with recent
  version of gcc (InternalCompilerErrors on m68k (now resolved), bad /
  faulty code on other archs). Still, -O3 seems to be the natural
  choice for a computational package like this, so you might want to
  test your luck...
- the doc-base entries weren't well adjusted, I changed them to fit
  reality again, please see the attached interdiff for details
- you might want to consider splitting off all architecture-independant
  documentation into a sextractor-doc package as more than half of all
  data isn't specific to any arch. However, the package as is isn't
  all too big to make this a must, though...


I've built the package after committing the changes mentioned in the
interdiff and put some files at
http://people.debian.org/~florian/sextractor/.
Please check whether those files are acceptable and if so then upload
the necessary parts into the Debian archives.

(I sooner or later tend to let my sponsees do the upload in order to
check whether they know how to do it properly. If there are problems
please don't hesitate to ask.)

Cheers,
Flo
diff -u sextractor-2.4.3/debian/sextractor.doc-base.handbook 
sextractor-2.4.3/debian/sextractor.doc-base.handbook
--- sextractor-2.4.3/debian/sextractor.doc-base.handbook
+++ sextractor-2.4.3/debian/sextractor.doc-base.handbook
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-Document: sextractor-doc-handbook
+Document: sextractor-handbook
 Title: Source Extractor for Dummies
 Author: Benne W. Holwerda
 Abstract:  Everything you wanted to know about Source Extractor and
  Benne was forced to find out.
-Section: science
+Section: Apps/Science
 
-Format: postscript
-Files: /usr/share/doc/sextractor-doc/SE_Handbook.4.ps.gz
+Format: pdf
+Files: /usr/share/doc/sextractor/SE_Handbook.4.pdf.gz
diff -u sextractor-2.4.3/debian/sextractor.doc-base.manual 
sextractor-2.4.3/debian/sextractor.doc-base.manual
--- sextractor-2.4.3/debian/sextractor.doc-base.manual
+++ sextractor-2.4.3/debian/sextractor.doc-base.manual
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-Document: sextractor-doc-manual
+Document: sextractor-manual
 Title: SExtractor v2.4 User's manual
 Author: Emmanuel Bertin
 Abstract: This manual describes what sextractor is and how it can be
  used to generate catalogues of objects from astronomical images. It
  gives full list and descriptions of configuration options and
  available output parameters.
-Section: science
+Section: Apps/Science
 
-Format: postscript
-Files: /usr/share/doc/sextractor-doc/sextractor.ps.gz
+Format: pdf
+Files: /usr/share/doc/sextractor/sextractor.pdf.gz
diff -u sextractor-2.4.3/debian/rules sextractor-2.4.3/debian/rules
--- sextractor-2.4.3/debian/rules
+++ sextractor-2.4.3/debian/rules
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
$(MAKE)
touch build-stamp
 
-clean: config.status
+clean:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp config.sub config.guess


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#260740: Still interested in SExtractor?

2005-10-06 Thread Florian Ernst 
Hello there,

I just stumbled over this old bugreport...

Are you still interested in getting SExtractor into the Debian
archives again? The situation has improved somewhat as there were some
new upstream releases and the formerly conflicting package sex has
been dropped, thus removing the need for some name adjustments.

If you still want to maintain this just put together some packages (I
think it's safe to drop any reference to my short-lived and primitive
packaging from way back then), add me as an uploader and drop me a
mail.
(Although I could have sworn you made it through NM within the last
year. But I can't find your name in any of the NM lists...)

Cheers,
Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#260740: Still interested in SExtractor?

2005-10-06 Thread Justin Pryzby 
Hello Florian,

Yes, I'm still interested in it; I had considered asking you for
sponsorship, too, but wasn't sure if you'd be interested, and wanted
to revisit the package first.

I've never so much as had my key signed, so haven't applied for NM
yet.  But, I'm going to the AAVSO (variable star) conference in Boston
8 days from now, and am in touch with 2 developers, at least one of
whom I hope to meet for signing.

How do I add you as an uploader?  Just list your name in .changes?  Or
do I need to fool around with gpg?  :)

Thanks for mailing; I'll revisit the package tonight or tomorrow.

-- 
Clear skies,
Justin

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:30:37AM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
 If you still want to maintain this just put together some packages (I
 think it's safe to drop any reference to my short-lived and primitive
 packaging from way back then), add me as an uploader and drop me a
 mail.
 (Although I could have sworn you made it through NM within the last
 year. But I can't find your name in any of the NM lists...)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]