Bug#342985: kdemultimedia on m68k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:00:11AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > >>* Stephen R Marenka [Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:58:48 -0600]: >> >> >>>Sorry, I meant the m68k binaries from 3.4.3-5 built with gcc-4.0. >> >>>I don't know what the implications of that might be, >> >> That if we froze today, or otherwise kdemultimedia did not receive >> more updates, a security update for kdemultimedia would FTBFS. Pretty >> unlikely, sure, but I would have personally preferred that such >> packages had not been uploaded. > > > It seemed preferrable to 4:3.3.2-1, which would be the alternative if > there were no more updates. Note that I meant it wouldn't make any difference for testing migration of 4:3.4.3-5 as m68k is ignored. So this alternative of 4:3.3.2-1 would only have count on m68k and only would only be valid till the next migration anyway. So I actually didn't see a reason for your upload as I can't imagine many testing m68k users that use kde and can't wait for 3.5 to enter testing (though I could be wrong of course). Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDqDQ85UTeB5t8Mo0RArqaAKC9YJlG30mGmvWpboe+u274nF4izQCfRhSK sgheWyrjGF9bPiLDGLekZdU= =BfkL -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#342985: kdemultimedia on m68k
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:00:11AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Stephen R Marenka [Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:58:48 -0600]: > > > Sorry, I meant the m68k binaries from 3.4.3-5 built with gcc-4.0. > > > I don't know what the implications of that might be, > > That if we froze today, or otherwise kdemultimedia did not receive > more updates, a security update for kdemultimedia would FTBFS. Pretty > unlikely, sure, but I would have personally preferred that such > packages had not been uploaded. It seemed preferrable to 4:3.3.2-1, which would be the alternative if there were no more updates. I shan't do it again. (koffice would be the only other likely candidate to my knowledge.) Sorry, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342985: kdemultimedia on m68k
* Stephen R Marenka [Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:58:48 -0600]: > Sorry, I meant the m68k binaries from 3.4.3-5 built with gcc-4.0. > I don't know what the implications of that might be, That if we froze today, or otherwise kdemultimedia did not receive more updates, a security update for kdemultimedia would FTBFS. Pretty unlikely, sure, but I would have personally preferred that such packages had not been uploaded. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Jacques Brel - Les bonbons -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342985: kdemultimedia on m68k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:14:32PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>Stephen R Marenka wrote: >> >>>I just built kdemultimedia on m68k by removing m68k from GCC4_ICES_HERE. >>> >>>Would you like me to go ahead an upload it? >> >>No, we are aware of it, but decided to first try to have 3.4.3 in >>testing. We will however upload a 3.5 version to experimental shortly >>which will fix this bug :-) > > > Sorry, I meant the m68k binaries from 3.4.3-5 built with gcc-4.0. I > don't know what the implications of that might be, but at least m68k > would be in sync. It looks like m68k currently has 4:3.3.2-1. It has no implications, though if we upload a new version that means extra delays for the testing migration. As we are already working on 3.5 packages for experimental we decided to fix these kind of bugs in that version... Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDpwRx5UTeB5t8Mo0RAkafAKCqH6J57HHyRB40X1WjlPvbIEt68QCfc3WS S/rRSfMwJW8EwsZ2LHakVvk= =SZ6z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342985: kdemultimedia on m68k
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:14:32PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I just built kdemultimedia on m68k by removing m68k from GCC4_ICES_HERE. > > > > Would you like me to go ahead an upload it? > > No, we are aware of it, but decided to first try to have 3.4.3 in > testing. We will however upload a 3.5 version to experimental shortly > which will fix this bug :-) Sorry, I meant the m68k binaries from 3.4.3-5 built with gcc-4.0. I don't know what the implications of that might be, but at least m68k would be in sync. It looks like m68k currently has 4:3.3.2-1. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342985: kdemultimedia on m68k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I just built kdemultimedia on m68k by removing m68k from GCC4_ICES_HERE. > > Would you like me to go ahead an upload it? No, we are aware of it, but decided to first try to have 3.4.3 in testing. We will however upload a 3.5 version to experimental shortly which will fix this bug :-) Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDpsBI5UTeB5t8Mo0RAjqUAJoDqyHVG21o4LiyYECkebHrYhvZ2gCfYPQr K6jtoP9vi1GOyL51CpkhrPg= =+Qr1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342985: kdemultimedia on m68k
I just built kdemultimedia on m68k by removing m68k from GCC4_ICES_HERE. Would you like me to go ahead an upload it? -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
