Bug#386354: closed by Kai Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#386354: epoch bumping is needed)

2006-09-07 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Kai Hendry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 0.2016-1 was never uploaded to Debian, so I can't this being a problem.

 Only 0.5 was finally uploaded.

Indeed, there is only 0.5-1 version listed in PTS [1].

I was confused, because I have recommended python-flup (=0.2015-1) in
my pastescript package after reading python-flup's changelog (since
0.2015-1 your package is new python policy ready) and now debcheck is
complaining [2]. Maybe changing unstable to UNRELEASED in all
unreleased versions of your package would be a good idea (so nobody
else will be confused).

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/flup.html
[2] http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstablepackage=pastescript

-- 
-=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=-
-=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=-


pgpIfML66NZvg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#386354: epoch bumping is needed

2006-09-06 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Package: python-flup
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: minor

2016 is greater than 5 so you need to bump epoch in package's version

try to run this:
$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.5-1 lt 0.2016-1  echo TRUE


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]