Bug#387783: [Debburn-devel] [PATCH] fix debburn/cdrkit GPL violation
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:32:57 +0200 Kai Wb. wrote: [...] Hi, only a short question: Is there some good reason why we should not integrate the proposed patch (by Albert Cahalan on debburn-devel [1] or [2]) which would fix the license problems? [...] [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debburn-devel/2006-September/64.html [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debburn-devel/2006-September/66.html [...] IMHO, one good reason is that a qualified lawyer should be consulted first. See my reply on debian-legal (that has not yet shown up on debburn-devel, probably because it's still in the moderator queue: I'm not a subscriber...): http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/09/msg00126.html -- But it is also tradition that times *must* and always do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_ . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgpnmGRe5w3Hq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#387783: [Debburn-devel] [PATCH] fix debburn/cdrkit GPL violation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, only a short question: Is there some good reason why we should not integrate the proposed patch (by Albert Cahalan on debburn-devel [1] or [2]) which would fix the license problems? Because if not I would appreciate a check-in to the svn repository. And we can close this Bug (#387783 ([3])). The only other solution would be to step back to a version without such restrictions. But I hope that won't be the solution. Greetings, Kai [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debburn-devel/2006-September/64.html [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debburn-devel/2006-September/66.html [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=387783 - -- Kai Wasserbäch (Kai Wasserbaech) E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber (debianforum.de): Drizzt URL: http://wiki.debianforum.de/Drizzt_Do%27Urden GnuPG-Key: 0xB0F385B4 (http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB0F385B4fingerprint=onhash=onop=vindex) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQGVAwUBRRVFlQjhutiw84W0AQqJaAv8DSVbnh3iqZTyjOQ5Ri2K061lIjWPKtZd 8PB4MuSqtVcAZDWY7GeRQkkF34MfRfedL1GBMG9gkPZ6n5MqXtnCuYbp7eVWijw/ qJRNgT7vYGsgoTpfX+FbT2gmbs29h0J9ZighfJC0Nntj3BmVoJmLQhTWoB+69Eju v4iKWekUjyLU68y66dNCg2EGmsiHmIOvc5LzXoFph81kgkbmk0hmGptBd/wzRuK6 6kMd6t2XQzVa8BTo4q92jGLXa3q0RTaeMNDrGpKMBK/vzDcCTP3Co97fxF/vHARd gMhzg1Aj32Fw1cqTen1FiBeXEHQA8brNqu1dwW0sN1L/PKt96SDvMqE3/86jVRd0 7bwkLaQOXXiVmzaw5sjFSW84exRha+Oam5Ca32G9YMLnma/s/VJ3Xo9PC6fIZ4sJ aorOKTmcrKB6rrPj0ytgcc/08/SIxRuqHvF1WcalWMlRvhlKaI2Se5zu2O71yp38 oJ5w4b2z0DgJt+AS+/pLlOY/37nBdIrC =J+h4 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
