Holger Levsen wrote:
from the package descriptions, feta and wajig seem to have the same features.
Joe Wreschnig, the orphaning maintainer of feta is also it's upstream, so I
wonder what reasons there are to keep feta in the archive?
Wouldn't removing it and adding a conflicts: provides: feta (or
replaces? it's too early on a sunday...) to wajig a sensible road to take?
Or am I missing something?
It's still very useful, but I don't have the time to maintain it myself.
Unless it becomes unusable for some reason I'd like to see it kept.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
