Bug#415407: tipa: dvipdf complains: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead
* Ryo Furue [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 15:16]: Yes, although my dvips is from a different package from yours: $ dvips mydoc.dvi -o mydoc.ps This is dvips(k) p1.7a Copyright 2005 ASCII Corp.([EMAIL PROTECTED]) based on dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2007.03.19:1507' - mydoc.ps tex.protexps.pro. cmr10.pfb[1] $ I seem to have the same dvips as yours: $ /usr/bin/dvips.nonja mydoc.dvi -o mydoc.ps This is dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2007.03.19:1507' - mydoc.ps tex.protexps.pro. cmr10.pfb[1] $ My dvips seems to be from the dvipsk-ja package, while the other one is from the tetex-bin package. I tried with dvipsk-ja installed here and I cannot replicate the bug. I am just curious: in the examples above, are you using the same mydoc.tex you reported before? Why is not tipa10.pfb getting included in the PS file? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415407: tipa: dvipdf complains: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead
Hi,
|
| $ /usr/bin/dvips.nonja mydoc.dvi -o mydoc.ps
| This is dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright [. . .]
| ' TeX output 2007.03.19:1507' - mydoc.ps
| tex.protexps.pro. cmr10.pfb[1]
| $
|
|
| My dvips seems to be from the dvipsk-ja package,
| while the other one is from the tetex-bin package.
|
| I tried with dvipsk-ja installed here and I cannot replicate the bug.
|
| I am just curious: in the examples above, are you using the same
| mydoc.tex you reported before?
Yes!
$ cat mydoc.tex
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tipa}
\begin{document}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\end{document}
$ latex mydoc.tex
. . . .
$ dvipdf mydoc.dvi
dvips: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead.
dvips: Such scaling will generate extremely poor output.
$ dvips mydoc.dvi
This is dvips(k) p1.7a Copyright 2005 ASCII Corp. [. . .]
based on dvips(k) 5.95a [. . .]
' TeX output 2007.03.19:2256' - mydoc.ps
tex.protexps.pro. cmr10.pfb[1]
$ ps2pdf mydoc.ps
$
| Why is not tipa10.pfb getting included in the PS
| file?
I wish I knew. . . . I don't know if I'm answering your question,
but the generated PS file contains a tipa10 bitmap:
%DVIPSBitmapFont: Fa tipa10 10 3
/Fa 3 115 df003FC1FFF80007C07E000E001F001C000F80380007E073E060
[ . . . snip . . .]
%EndDVIPSBitmapFont
The generated PDF file (by ps2pdf) also seems to contain it:
$ pdffonts mydoc.pdf
name type emb sub uni object ID
--- --- --- -
SXUDLP+CMR10 Type 1C yes yes no 9 0
[none] Type 3 yes no yes 10 0
$
Adobe Acrobat says that mydoc.pdf contains a font named
a font called T3Font_O besides CMR10 (embedded).
So, it seems that how tipa fonts are handled is somehow different
on my system than on yours, right? Do you have any idea on
where to look? vflib2 ?
Regards,
Ryo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415407: tipa: dvipdf complains: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead
* Ryo Furue [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 23:14]:
| Why is not tipa10.pfb getting included in the PS
| file?
I wish I knew. . . . I don't know if I'm answering your question,
but the generated PS file contains a tipa10 bitmap:
%DVIPSBitmapFont: Fa tipa10 10 3
/Fa 3 115 df003FC1FFF80007C07E000E001F001C000F80380007E073E060
[ . . . snip . . .]
%EndDVIPSBitmapFont
I obtain a different result:
$ grep tipa mydoc.ps
%%DocumentFonts: CMR10 TeX-tipa10
%%BeginFont: TeX-tipa10
%!PS-AdobeFont-1.0: TeX-tipa10 001.001
/FamilyName (TeX\040tipa10) def
/FullName (TeX\040tipa10\040Regular) def
/FontName /TeX-tipa10 def
@start /Fa 141[33 1[46 47[37 64[{}3 83.022 /TeX-tipa10
It seems that, in my system, the tipa10.pfb is actually included in the PS
file (cf the %!PS-AdobeFont-1.0 header above). In your case, it seems that
regular bitmapped PK font has been included.
The generated PDF file (by ps2pdf) also seems to contain it:
$ pdffonts mydoc.pdf
name type emb sub uni object ID
--- --- --- -
SXUDLP+CMR10 Type 1C yes yes no 9 0
[none] Type 3 yes no yes 10 0
$
Adobe Acrobat says that mydoc.pdf contains a font named
a font called T3Font_O besides CMR10 (embedded).
Again, I get different results:
$ pdffonts mydoc.pdf
name type emb sub uni object ID
--- --- --- -
OTJKZH+CMR10 Type 1C yes yes no 11 0
ISKIZW+TeX-tipa12Type 1C yes yes no 9 0
So, it seems that how tipa fonts are handled is somehow different
on my system than on yours, right? Do you have any idea on
where to look? vflib2 ?
We should try to understand why in my system the *.pfb files are used, while
they are ignored in yours. I have no clue where to start looking.
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415407: tipa: dvipdf complains: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead
* Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-20 10:32]: We should try to understand why in my system the *.pfb files are used, while they are ignored in yours. I have no clue where to start looking. What does this gives for you: grep tipa /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg \ /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/psfonts.map -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415407: tipa: dvipdf complains: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead
Hi Rafael, | What does this gives for you: | | grep tipa /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg \ | /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/psfonts.map | $ grep tipa /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ### From file: /etc/texmf/updmap.d/10tipa.cfg # 10tipa.cfg MixedMap tipa.map ### End of file: /etc/texmf/updmap.d/10tipa.cfg $ grep tipa /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/psfonts.map tipa10 TeX-tipa10 tipa10.pfb tipa12 TeX-tipa12 tipa12.pfb tipa17 TeX-tipa17 tipa17.pfb tipa8 TeX-tipa8 tipa8.pfb tipa9 TeX-tipa9 tipa9.pfb tipab10 TeX-tipab10 tipab10.pfb tipabs10 TeX-tipabs10 tipabs10.pfb tipabx10 TeX-tipabx10 tipabx10.pfb tipabx12 TeX-tipabx12 tipabx12.pfb tipabx8 TeX-tipabx8 tipabx8.pfb tipabx9 TeX-tipabx9 tipabx9.pfb tipasb10 TeX-tipasb10 tipasb10.pfb tipasi10 TeX-tipasi10 tipasi10.pfb tipasl10 TeX-tipasl10 tipasl10.pfb tipasl12 TeX-tipasl12 tipasl12.pfb tipasl8 TeX-tipasl8 tipasl8.pfb tipasl9 TeX-tipasl9 tipasl9.pfb tipass10 TeX-tipass10 tipass10.pfb tipass12 TeX-tipass12 tipass12.pfb tipass17 TeX-tipass17 tipass17.pfb tipass8 TeX-tipass8 tipass8.pfb tipass9 TeX-tipass9 tipass9.pfb tipats10 TeX-tipats10 tipats10.pfb tipatt10 TeX-tipatt10 tipatt10.pfb tipatt12 TeX-tipatt12 tipatt12.pfb tipatt8 TeX-tipatt8 tipatt8.pfb tipatt9 TeX-tipatt9 tipatt9.pfb $ Regards, Ryo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415407: tipa: dvipdf complains: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead
* Ryo Furue [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-20 12:24]: | What does this gives for you: | | grep tipa /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg \ | /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/psfonts.map | $ grep tipa /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ### From file: /etc/texmf/updmap.d/10tipa.cfg # 10tipa.cfg MixedMap tipa.map ### End of file: /etc/texmf/updmap.d/10tipa.cfg $ grep tipa /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/psfonts.map tipa10 TeX-tipa10 tipa10.pfb tipa12 TeX-tipa12 tipa12.pfb tipa17 TeX-tipa17 tipa17.pfb tipa8 TeX-tipa8 tipa8.pfb tipa9 TeX-tipa9 tipa9.pfb tipab10 TeX-tipab10 tipab10.pfb tipabs10 TeX-tipabs10 tipabs10.pfb tipabx10 TeX-tipabx10 tipabx10.pfb tipabx12 TeX-tipabx12 tipabx12.pfb tipabx8 TeX-tipabx8 tipabx8.pfb tipabx9 TeX-tipabx9 tipabx9.pfb tipasb10 TeX-tipasb10 tipasb10.pfb tipasi10 TeX-tipasi10 tipasi10.pfb tipasl10 TeX-tipasl10 tipasl10.pfb tipasl12 TeX-tipasl12 tipasl12.pfb tipasl8 TeX-tipasl8 tipasl8.pfb tipasl9 TeX-tipasl9 tipasl9.pfb tipass10 TeX-tipass10 tipass10.pfb tipass12 TeX-tipass12 tipass12.pfb tipass17 TeX-tipass17 tipass17.pfb tipass8 TeX-tipass8 tipass8.pfb tipass9 TeX-tipass9 tipass9.pfb tipats10 TeX-tipats10 tipats10.pfb tipatt10 TeX-tipatt10 tipatt10.pfb tipatt12 TeX-tipatt12 tipatt12.pfb tipatt8 TeX-tipatt8 tipatt8.pfb tipatt9 TeX-tipatt9 tipatt9.pfb Okay, I am puzzled. Let us try this: dvips -o mydoc.ps mydoc.dvi -d 3650 2 mydoc.dvips.log and send to me the resulting log file. Thanks. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415407: tipa: dvipdf complains: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead
package tipa
tags 415407 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
* Ryo Furue [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-18 23:13]:
Package: tipa
Version: 2:1.3-4
Severity: normal
Hi
When I try to convert a DVI file using dvipdf, this happens:
$ latex mydoc.tex
. . . .
$ dvipdf mydoc.dvi
dvips: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead.
dvips: Such scaling will generate extremely poor output.
$
The resulting PDF looks OK, though. If I generate a PDF file,
via a PostScript file, then I don't see any error:
$ dvips mydoc.dvi
$ ps2pdf mydoc.ps
$
In case the following information is relevent:
My dvipdf comes from the gs-common package and my /usr/bin/gs
points to /usr/bin/gs-esp .
%--- mydoc.tex: source LaTeX file --
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tipa}
\begin{document}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\end{document}
%--- end of source ---
I cannot reproduce this bug at all in my sid chroot here. I suspect that
the problem is due to some TeX configuration on your system, and does not
really come from the tipa package.
The error message issued by dvipdf (actually dvips) above typically occurs
when the font cannot be generated by some tool in the build chain, like
metafont. However, since the tipa*.pfb files are present in the package,
those files get included by dvips. Indeed:
$ dvips mydoc.dvi -o mydoc.ps
This is dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com)
'TeX output 2007.03.20:0047'- mydoc.dvi
tex.protexps.pro. tipa10.pfbcmr10.pfb[1]
Do you get the same as above in your system?
I tagged this bug moreinfo, meaning that if I do not receive further
information in a reasonable time frame (say, one month from now) allowing to
reproduce the bug reliably, this bug report will be closed.
Anyway, thanks for your bug report.
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415407: tipa: dvipdf complains: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead
Thanks, Rafael, for your help. | The error message issued by dvipdf (actually dvips) above typically | occurs when the font cannot be generated by some tool in the build | chain, like metafont. However, since the tipa*.pfb files are | present in the package, those files get included by dvips. Indeed: | | $ dvips mydoc.dvi -o mydoc.ps | This is dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) | 'TeX output 2007.03.20:0047'- mydoc.dvi | tex.protexps.pro. tipa10.pfbcmr10.pfb[1] | | Do you get the same as above in your system? Yes, although my dvips is from a different package from yours: $ dvips mydoc.dvi -o mydoc.ps This is dvips(k) p1.7a Copyright 2005 ASCII Corp.([EMAIL PROTECTED]) based on dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2007.03.19:1507' - mydoc.ps tex.protexps.pro. cmr10.pfb[1] $ I seem to have the same dvips as yours: $ /usr/bin/dvips.nonja mydoc.dvi -o mydoc.ps This is dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2007.03.19:1507' - mydoc.ps tex.protexps.pro. cmr10.pfb[1] $ My dvips seems to be from the dvipsk-ja package, while the other one is from the tetex-bin package. Ryo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415407: tipa: dvipdf complains: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead
Package: tipa
Version: 2:1.3-4
Severity: normal
Hi
When I try to convert a DVI file using dvipdf, this happens:
$ latex mydoc.tex
. . . .
$ dvipdf mydoc.dvi
dvips: Font tipa10 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead.
dvips: Such scaling will generate extremely poor output.
$
The resulting PDF looks OK, though. If I generate a PDF file,
via a PostScript file, then I don't see any error:
$ dvips mydoc.dvi
$ ps2pdf mydoc.ps
$
In case the following information is relevent:
My dvipdf comes from the gs-common package and my /usr/bin/gs
points to /usr/bin/gs-esp .
%--- mydoc.tex: source LaTeX file --
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tipa}
\begin{document}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\end{document}
%--- end of source ---
Hope this helps,
Ryo
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages tipa depends on:
ii tetex-base 3.0.dfsg.3-5 Basic TeX input files of teTeX
ii tetex-bin 3.0-30 The teTeX programs
tipa recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
