Hello Peter, hello Jamie,
[ cf. http://bugs.debian.org/465771 ]
I, for one, actually like the leading zero. For me it makes the display
feel complete when using 24 hour mode.
Jamie, what do you think?
Cheers,
Flo
---BeginMessage---
Package: xdaliclock
Version: 2.25-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
'xdaliclock -countdown' automatically enables 24-hour mode, so that the
number of hours is always displayed correctly. However, 24-hour mode
also implies a leading 0 in the hours column, which I do not want.
Thus I'd like for 'xdaliclock -12 -countdown' to have its usual effect
of saying 4:33 instead of 04:33.
The following patch fixes this. The command line I use for testing:
xdaliclock -12 -title 'Can we go home yet?' -countdown $(LC_TIME=C date +'%b
%d 17:00:00 %Y')
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--- xdaliclock-2.25/X11/digital.c
+++ xdaliclock-2.25/X11/digital.c
@@ -735,10 +735,12 @@
tm-tm_sec = delta % 60;
tm-tm_min = (delta / 60) % 60;
tm-tm_hour = (delta / (60 * 60)) % 100;
- twelve_hour_time = 0;
}
- if (twelve_hour_time tm-tm_hour 12) tm-tm_hour -= 12;
- if (twelve_hour_time tm-tm_hour == 0) tm-tm_hour = 12;
+ else
+{
+ if (twelve_hour_time tm-tm_hour 12) tm-tm_hour -= 12;
+ if (twelve_hour_time tm-tm_hour == 0) tm-tm_hour = 12;
+}
time_digits [0] = (tm-tm_hour - (tm-tm_hour % 10)) / 10;
time_digits [1] = tm-tm_hour % 10;
time_digits [2] = (tm-tm_min - (tm-tm_min % 10)) / 10;
---End Message---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
