Bug#497739: rrdtool: Reported fix...doesn't work
Package: rrdtool Version: 1.3.8-1 Followup-For: Bug #497739 I've just tested both the reported-fixed 1.3.7-1 and the refreshed 1.3.8-1 versions of RRDTool and the buggy behaviour persists in these versions. Using a sample invocation of: rrdtool graph /var/www/sysinfo/rrdcgi-eth0.png \ --imginfo 'IMG SRC=/sysinfo/%s WIDTH=%lu HEIGHT=%lu ' \ --start -1week \ --width 800 \ --height 600 \ --title=eth0 Network Utilisation \ --interlaced \ --vertical-label Bytes/Sec \ --base 1000 \ --slope-mode \ DEF:RX=/var/local/rrd/netutil_eth0.rrd:rx:AVERAGE \ DEF:TX=/var/local/rrd/netutil_eth0.rrd:tx:AVERAGE \ CDEF:RXkb=RX,1000,/ \ CDEF:TXkb=TX,1000,/ \ LINE2:RX#20FF20:RX \ LINE2:TX#FF2020:TX Still produces output of: IMG SRC=/sysinfo//var/www/sysinfo/rrdcgi-eth0.png WIDTH=897 HEIGHT=674 Instead of the documented and expected output of: IMG SRC=/sysinfo/rrdcgi-eth0.png WIDTH=897 HEIGHT=674 -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 'stable'), (50, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages rrdtool depends on: ii libc6 2.9-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.8.6-2+b1The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libglib2.0-0 2.20.0-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libpango1.0-0 1.22.4-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.27-2 PNG library - runtime ii librrd41.3.1-4 Time-series data storage and displ ii libxml22.6.32.dfsg-5 GNOME XML library rrdtool recommends no packages. Versions of packages rrdtool suggests: ii librrds-perl 1.3.1-4Time-series data storage and displ -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#497739: rrdtool: Reported fix...doesn't work
Hi, On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 03:02:50PM +0100, Matthew Exley wrote: I've just tested both the reported-fixed 1.3.7-1 and the refreshed 1.3.8-1 versions of RRDTool and the buggy behaviour persists in these versions. Versions of packages rrdtool depends on: [...] ii librrd41.3.1-4 Time-series data storage and displ You should upgrade librrd4 as well. The rrdtool binary only provides a wrapper around the library - all functionality is implemented in the library. HTH, Sebastian -- Sebastian tokkee Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#497739: rrdtool: Reported fix...doesn't work
AAARRRGGHGHH Missed that *completely* - thanks for the email, upgrading librrd4 fixed the problem as you'd suggested it would. Now, should I have egg on my face for missing it, or should the dependencies for rrdtool have sorted that out for me? I note rrdtool only has: librrd4 (= 1.3.0) (I did apt-get -u install rrdtool to upgrade, and that's normally pretty good at pulling in dependencies). Sorry for wasting your time on this one though. Cheers, Matthew 2009/6/4 Sebastian Harl s...@tokkee.org Hi, On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 03:02:50PM +0100, Matthew Exley wrote: I've just tested both the reported-fixed 1.3.7-1 and the refreshed 1.3.8-1 versions of RRDTool and the buggy behaviour persists in these versions. Versions of packages rrdtool depends on: [...] ii librrd41.3.1-4 Time-series data storage and displ You should upgrade librrd4 as well. The rrdtool binary only provides a wrapper around the library - all functionality is implemented in the library. HTH, Sebastian -- Sebastian tokkee Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkon2u8ACgkQEFEKc4UBx/ygIQCcCrZ1UgpT+2Qj9f8CY7H5vM+7 RVEAnjpITFrzUYfPDPO6NRi9TqgqTBNc =SsKw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Matthew Exley hen...@guided-naafi.org
Bug#497739: rrdtool: Reported fix...doesn't work
Hi, On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 03:37:51PM +0100, Matthew Exley wrote: Now, should I have egg on my face for missing it, or should the dependencies for rrdtool have sorted that out for me? I note rrdtool only has: librrd4 (= 1.3.0) rrdtool does not _require_ a more up-to-date version of librrd4. (I did apt-get -u install rrdtool to upgrade, and that's normally pretty good at pulling in dependencies). Do you use pinning or something similar? Letting aside dependencies, the new version should have been pulled in because of the higher version number. HTH, Sebastian -- Sebastian tokkee Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#497739: rrdtool: Reported fix...doesn't work
Thanks again for looking at this.. 2009/6/4 Sebastian Harl s...@tokkee.org Hi, On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 03:37:51PM +0100, Matthew Exley wrote: Now, should I have egg on my face for missing it, or should the dependencies for rrdtool have sorted that out for me? I note rrdtool only has: librrd4 (= 1.3.0) rrdtool does not _require_ a more up-to-date version of librrd4. Understood. (Seems odd to me that they're not in lockstep, but I'm not questioning it) (I did apt-get -u install rrdtool to upgrade, and that's normally pretty good at pulling in dependencies). Do you use pinning or something similar? Letting aside dependencies, the new version should have been pulled in because of the higher version number. I did mention I did a single-package install. I'm sure an apt-get upgrade would have dragged it in, but I didn't do that. Your explanation above about not *requiring* an upgrade explains the behaviour adequately, I think. Cheers, -- Matthew Exley hen...@guided-naafi.org
