Bug#576640: update request for qmail-src
Quoting Jon Marler (jmar...@debian.org): Hello Jon, Have you been able to sort things out? if the FTBFS is #584745, I think the report is too incomplete for being properly processed. The bug submitter never followed up, also. I'd suggest tagging moreinfo and ignoring ATM. It's a valid bug. It is super easy to reproduce ... just try apt-get source -b qmail-src and you can easily see where it blows up. I have found the regression, and am still trying to sort out how to get back to a working state, and then merge back in the changes that I have made since the regression. I have been hesitant to submit what I have done without making sure I'm not producing yet another regression. I just haven't had much time to work on it. I'll get it done this week though. I understand your urgency in wanting to get this patch finished, and I will be sensitive to that urgency. I understood the fix is tricky an,d probably out of my skills but is there anything I can do to help with that upload? Now that the freeze has been announced, I'm somehow most closely following packages with several pending l10n updates. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#576640: update request for qmail-src
Quoting Jonathan Marler (jmar...@debian.org): Ping. This review process happened about 3 months ago. Would it be possible to consider an upload with these changes applied? I begin to think about one of my usual l10n NMU but wanted to first discuss with package maintainer(s) in case something else is holding off a new upload. I would appreciate it if you could give me some time before submitting an NMU. I am currently sorting out a FTBFS regression in my last upload, and want to make sure I have it completely sorted out before uploading a new version. The next version I upload will have the patch you created applied before building. Thank you for following up with me on this. Hello Jonathan, Have you been able to sort things out? If the FTBFS is #584745, I think the report is too incomplete for being properly processed. The bug submitter never followed up, also. I'd suggest tagging moreinfo and ignoring ATM. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#576640: update request for qmail-src
Hello Jon, Have you been able to sort things out? if the FTBFS is #584745, I think the report is too incomplete for being properly processed. The bug submitter never followed up, also. I'd suggest tagging moreinfo and ignoring ATM. It's a valid bug. It is super easy to reproduce ... just try apt-get source -b qmail-src and you can easily see where it blows up. I have found the regression, and am still trying to sort out how to get back to a working state, and then merge back in the changes that I have made since the regression. I have been hesitant to submit what I have done without making sure I'm not producing yet another regression. I just haven't had much time to work on it. I'll get it done this week though. I understand your urgency in wanting to get this patch finished, and I will be sensitive to that urgency. Cheers! Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#576640: update request for qmail-src
Ping. This review process happened about 3 months ago. Would it be possible to consider an upload with these changes applied? I begin to think about one of my usual l10n NMU but wanted to first discuss with package maintainer(s) in case something else is holding off a new upload. I would appreciate it if you could give me some time before submitting an NMU. I am currently sorting out a FTBFS regression in my last upload, and want to make sure I have it completely sorted out before uploading a new version. The next version I upload will have the patch you created applied before building. Thank you for following up with me on this. Cheers! Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#576640: update request for qmail-src
Quoting Jonathan Marler (jmar...@debian.org): Ping. This review process happened about 3 months ago. Would it be possible to consider an upload with these changes applied? I begin to think about one of my usual l10n NMU but wanted to first discuss with package maintainer(s) in case something else is holding off a new upload. I would appreciate it if you could give me some time before submitting an NMU. I am currently sorting out a FTBFS regression in my last upload, and want to make sure I have it completely sorted out before uploading a new version. Oh, no problem at all. As my initial mail was saying, this was more a ping mail in order to check with you if other commitments were preventing you from working on the package. As long as these updates are included in the next update to come, I'm fine with any schedule. The next version I upload will have the patch you created applied before building. Great... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
