Bug#605065: Bug#605777: Bug#607662: Bug#605777: Bug#607662: ncurses-base: backspace key deletes forwards on the kFreeBSD console
2011/1/4 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: As the freebsd-utils change has hit testing after all, is unblocking ncurses to go with it sufficient, or do we need further changes? This is what Petr said after asking me to revert those patches: Later we might provide sed script to alter loaded keymap into policy conforming. It together with ncurses 5.7+20100313-5 will allow to have conforming and backspace working local console. But for now it is better to provide previous state. So I guess we only need an unblock for freebsd-utils_8.1-3.1 and kfreebsd-8_8.1+dfsg-7.1. (freebsd-utils_8.1-3.1 is being uploaded ATTOW) Thanks -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#605065: Bug#605777: Bug#607662: Bug#605777: Bug#607662: ncurses-base: backspace key deletes forwards on the kFreeBSD console
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 20:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-12-29 00:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 20:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: So best option for now seems be to prevent freebsd-utils 8.1-3 from entering testing and a new upload of kfreebsd-8. For the record, freebsd-utils 8.1-3 will migrate in three days if not hindered. [...] I have added the proposed patch for the cons25-debian terminfo entry to ncurses git¹. Once this is in unstable, the kFreeBSD people may choose to implement any of the suggested solutions. That's now happened; thanks. Is the ncurses change suitable for migration in its own right, or does it need an associated change on the kFreeBSD side still? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#605065: Bug#605777: Bug#607662: Bug#605777: Bug#607662: ncurses-base: backspace key deletes forwards on the kFreeBSD console
Hello, On trečiadienis 05 Sausis 2011 00:09:21 Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 20:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-12-29 00:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 20:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: So best option for now seems be to prevent freebsd-utils 8.1-3 from entering testing and a new upload of kfreebsd-8. For the record, freebsd-utils 8.1-3 will migrate in three days if not hindered. [...] I have added the proposed patch for the cons25-debian terminfo entry to ncurses git¹. Once this is in unstable, the kFreeBSD people may choose to implement any of the suggested solutions. That's now happened; thanks. Is the ncurses change suitable for migration in its own right, or does it need an associated change on the kFreeBSD side still? Huh, looks like kfreebsd kernel change was reverted [1]. [1] http://lists.debian.org/e1pa9a9-00028v...@franck.debian.org -- Modestas Vainius mo...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#605065: Bug#605777: Bug#607662: Bug#605777: Bug#607662: ncurses-base: backspace key deletes forwards on the kFreeBSD console
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 00:17 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: Hello, On trečiadienis 05 Sausis 2011 00:09:21 Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 20:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-12-29 00:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 20:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: So best option for now seems be to prevent freebsd-utils 8.1-3 from entering testing and a new upload of kfreebsd-8. For the record, freebsd-utils 8.1-3 will migrate in three days if not hindered. Hmmm, in fact it looks like someone else unblocked it, so it's migrated anyway. I have added the proposed patch for the cons25-debian terminfo entry to ncurses git¹. Once this is in unstable, the kFreeBSD people may choose to implement any of the suggested solutions. That's now happened; thanks. Is the ncurses change suitable for migration in its own right, or does it need an associated change on the kFreeBSD side still? Huh, looks like kfreebsd kernel change was reverted [1]. [1] http://lists.debian.org/e1pa9a9-00028v...@franck.debian.org Indeed. I'm now thoroughly confused. :-) As the freebsd-utils change has hit testing after all, is unblocking ncurses to go with it sufficient, or do we need further changes? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
