Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Hi, here's a short update on the poppler transition: as can be seen on [1], all rdeps besides libreoffice (mips/el) and gdcm have been built and should be ready. gdcm: Even with [2] fixed, gdcm still ftbfs due to VTK being buggy wrt multiarch [3]. This can be temporarily worked around by binNMUing VTK to pick up the new library locations [4]. After that, gdcm should be binNMUable again. Julien seems to favor getting a proper fix for VTK though, even if that would most likely mean to remove gdcm from testing for the time being. libreoffice: LO ftbfs on mips(el). Rene believes this to be a buildd issue and as he told me on irc is waiting for help from the mips porters, which hasn't happened so far. Would be nice to know, how the release team plans to handle those two issues, so we can get the transition done. Cheers, Michael [1] http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/poppler.html [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631497 [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506992 [4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506992#24 -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Hi, On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 05:35:19PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Julien seems to favor getting a proper fix for VTK though, even if that would most likely mean to remove gdcm from testing for the time being. libreoffice: LO ftbfs on mips(el). Rene believes this to be a buildd issue and as he told me on irc is waiting for help from the mips porters, which hasn't happened so far. Not completely true. I said it's a *port* issue. Whether it's also a buildd issue or not is beyond my scope, but as said to Michael on IRC - mips built fine on gabrielli. mipsel has no porterbox, so.. :( Would be nice to know, how the release team plans to handle those two issues, so we can get the transition done. Unless some MIPS porter does something (I see that libreoffice was requeued on lucatelli - same hw as gabrielli - let's see whether that builds; it's still Building, so there's hope) I'd suggest to remove the obsolete binaries. Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:11:41 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 05:35:19PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Julien seems to favor getting a proper fix for VTK though, even if that would most likely mean to remove gdcm from testing for the time being. libreoffice: LO ftbfs on mips(el). Rene believes this to be a buildd issue and as he told me on irc is waiting for help from the mips porters, which hasn't happened so far. Not completely true. I said it's a *port* issue. Whether it's also a buildd issue or not is beyond my scope, but as said to Michael on IRC - mips built fine on gabrielli. mipsel has no porterbox, so.. :( Would be nice to know, how the release team plans to handle those two issues, so we can get the transition done. Unless some MIPS porter does something (I see that libreoffice was requeued on lucatelli - same hw as gabrielli - let's see whether that builds; it's still Building, so there's hope) I'd suggest to remove the obsolete binaries. Did you contact debian-mips@ about that issue? I don't see anything from you there in the last couple months. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Alle domenica 3 luglio 2011, Michael Biebl ha scritto: Am 10.06.2011 17:03, schrieb Pino Toscano: Sources that can be binNMU'ed: apvlv (poppler-glib) auto-multiple-choice (poppler) cups (poppler) epdfview (poppler-glib) gambas2 (poppler) gdcm (poppler) gimp (poppler-glib) gpdftext (poppler-glib) gnome-commander (poppler) gummi (poppler-glib) inkscape (poppler, poppler-glib) koffice (poppler) libreoffice (poppler) luatex (poppler) pdf-presenter-console (poppler-glib) pdf2djvu (poppler) pdf2svg (poppler-glib) pdfcube (poppler-glib) pdfgrep (poppler) pdftoipe (poppler) popplerkit.framework (poppler) referencer (poppler-glib) ruby-gnome2 (poppler-glib) texlive-bin (poppler) tracker (poppler-glib) tumbler (poppler-glib) xournal (poppler-glib) webkit2pdf (poppler-glib) zathura (poppler-glib) [...] I'm planning on uploading poppler to 0.6.17-2 later today. poppler 0.16.7-2 uploaded and built correctly on every release arch (and more), could you please schedule the binNMUs for the packages above (excluding gdcm, currently broken)? Thanks, -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:50:00AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: Alle domenica 3 luglio 2011, Michael Biebl ha scritto: Am 10.06.2011 17:03, schrieb Pino Toscano: Sources that can be binNMU'ed: apvlv (poppler-glib) auto-multiple-choice (poppler) cups (poppler) epdfview (poppler-glib) gambas2 (poppler) gdcm (poppler) gimp (poppler-glib) gpdftext (poppler-glib) gnome-commander (poppler) gummi (poppler-glib) inkscape (poppler, poppler-glib) koffice (poppler) libreoffice (poppler) luatex (poppler) pdf-presenter-console (poppler-glib) pdf2djvu (poppler) pdf2svg (poppler-glib) pdfcube (poppler-glib) pdfgrep (poppler) pdftoipe (poppler) popplerkit.framework (poppler) referencer (poppler-glib) ruby-gnome2 (poppler-glib) texlive-bin (poppler) tracker (poppler-glib) tumbler (poppler-glib) xournal (poppler-glib) webkit2pdf (poppler-glib) zathura (poppler-glib) [...] I'm planning on uploading poppler to 0.6.17-2 later today. poppler 0.16.7-2 uploaded and built correctly on every release arch (and more), could you please schedule the binNMUs for the packages above (excluding gdcm, currently broken)? Not yet done for epdfview and libreoffice. Done for the others. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:07:01PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Not yet done for epdfview and libreoffice. Done for the others. Now done for epdfview and libreoffice, too. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Alle lunedì 4 luglio 2011, Philipp Kern ha scritto: On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:07:01PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Not yet done for epdfview and libreoffice. Done for the others. Now done for epdfview and libreoffice, too. Sorry, I missed also calibre (which uses the libpoppler-dev material by means of libpoppler-qt4-dev). Could you please binNMU it as well (it should build fine), and add it to the transition tracker? Thanks, -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Pino, am Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:21:51PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: Alle lunedì 4 luglio 2011, Philipp Kern ha scritto: On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:07:01PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Not yet done for epdfview and libreoffice. Done for the others. Now done for epdfview and libreoffice, too. Sorry, I missed also calibre (which uses the libpoppler-dev material by means of libpoppler-qt4-dev). Could you please binNMU it as well (it should build fine), and add it to the transition tracker? the transition tracker isn't manual. So either it doesn't need a binNMU because it doesn't directly link it or the expression for the list of affected packages is wrong (on the top of the page). Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Alle lunedì 4 luglio 2011, Philipp Kern ha scritto: Pino, am Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:21:51PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: Alle lunedì 4 luglio 2011, Philipp Kern ha scritto: On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:07:01PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Not yet done for epdfview and libreoffice. Done for the others. Now done for epdfview and libreoffice, too. Sorry, I missed also calibre (which uses the libpoppler-dev material by means of libpoppler-qt4-dev). Could you please binNMU it as well (it should build fine), and add it to the transition tracker? the transition tracker isn't manual. So either it doesn't need a binNMU because it doesn't directly link it or the expression for the list of affected packages is wrong (on the top of the page). The list is correct, generally -- it's just calibre using a build depenency because it is pulled directly from another one. For adding I was referring to the conditions of the affected packages, like i saw a .package condition in the python2.7 tracker page. If it isn't the case, sorry for the mistake, and then just add the libpoppler- qt4-dev b-d to the affected conditions. Thanks, -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:53:33PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: The list is correct, generally -- it's just calibre using a build depenency because it is pulled directly from another one. For adding I was referring to the conditions of the affected packages, like i saw a .package condition in the python2.7 tracker page. If it isn't the case, sorry for the mistake, and then just add the libpoppler- qt4-dev b-d to the affected conditions. Added, let's wait for the next update. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Am 10.06.2011 17:03, schrieb Pino Toscano: Sources that can be binNMU'ed: apvlv (poppler-glib) auto-multiple-choice (poppler) cups (poppler) epdfview (poppler-glib) gambas2 (poppler) gdcm (poppler) gimp (poppler-glib) gpdftext (poppler-glib) gnome-commander (poppler) gummi (poppler-glib) inkscape (poppler, poppler-glib) koffice (poppler) libreoffice (poppler) luatex (poppler) pdf-presenter-console (poppler-glib) pdf2djvu (poppler) pdf2svg (poppler-glib) pdfcube (poppler-glib) pdfgrep (poppler) pdftoipe (poppler) popplerkit.framework (poppler) referencer (poppler-glib) ruby-gnome2 (poppler-glib) texlive-bin (poppler) tracker (poppler-glib) tumbler (poppler-glib) xournal (poppler-glib) webkit2pdf (poppler-glib) zathura (poppler-glib) I did a test-rebuild of those packages last friday against poppler 0.16.7-1 from experimental. It turns out, out of these packages gdcm is currently not buildable and fails during configure. I filed a bug for that [1]. Even after fixing that, the package still ftbfs, due to vtk not being multiarch ready [2]. Afaics there is no easy fix for the vtk issue and no clear timeframe when such a fix would be ready. As a consequence I asked on irc if (temporarily) removing gdcm from testing would be an option. According to adsb this would affect gdcm ants insighttoolkit mriconvert Both adsb and mehdi were ok with that, so I'm planning on uploading poppler to 0.6.17-2 later today. Cheers, Michael [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632406 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629815 -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#628047: Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Hi, Alle giovedì 30 giugno 2011, Michael Biebl ha scritto: Am 29.06.2011 19:11, schrieb Philipp Kern: the only issue I see at the moment is this: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 05:03:47PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: * python-poppler (poppler-glib) The (small) patch needed to compile with poppler 0.16 is not compatible with poppler 0.12, so it cannot be uploaded right now. Asked to provide a version in experimental compilable with poppler 0.16, see #628047. There's a claim at the LP bug[1] that the patch isn't suitable. From a casual look that comment seems wrong, but you can judge this better than me. If that's resolved I'm ok with you going ahead with this transition. Please ping me when it's uploaded, though, so that I can take care of the binNMUs. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler-python/+bug/696025 Jakub mentioned on irc that the patch in [1] is wrong. There's an alternate patch shipped in the fedora package. I've attached this patch and hope the more python/poppler savvy people can take a look at it. This new patch looks better indeed. It breaks the API (*) though, but follows the upstream API change in poppler-glib. I verified the four packages in archive using python-poppler: douf00 gedit-latex-plugin gourmet pdfshuffler and apparently none of them uses the get_text() function of a PopplerPage, so there is nothing that would get broken by this new poppler-python patch. (*) -PopplerPage.get_text(style, rect) +PopplerPage.get_text() +PopplerPage.get_selected_text(style, selection) -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#628047: Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:39:20AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: This new patch looks better indeed. It breaks the API (*) though, but follows the upstream API change in poppler-glib. I verified the four packages in archive using python-poppler: douf00 gedit-latex-plugin gourmet pdfshuffler and apparently none of them uses the get_text() function of a PopplerPage, so there is nothing that would get broken by this new poppler-python patch. \o/ Then let's do it. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Hi, the only issue I see at the moment is this: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 05:03:47PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: * python-poppler (poppler-glib) The (small) patch needed to compile with poppler 0.16 is not compatible with poppler 0.12, so it cannot be uploaded right now. Asked to provide a version in experimental compilable with poppler 0.16, see #628047. There's a claim at the LP bug[1] that the patch isn't suitable. From a casual look that comment seems wrong, but you can judge this better than me. If that's resolved I'm ok with you going ahead with this transition. Please ping me when it's uploaded, though, so that I can take care of the binNMUs. Kind regards Philipp Kern [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler-python/+bug/696025 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Am 29.06.2011 19:11, schrieb Philipp Kern: Hi, the only issue I see at the moment is this: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 05:03:47PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: * python-poppler (poppler-glib) The (small) patch needed to compile with poppler 0.16 is not compatible with poppler 0.12, so it cannot be uploaded right now. Asked to provide a version in experimental compilable with poppler 0.16, see #628047. There's a claim at the LP bug[1] that the patch isn't suitable. From a casual look that comment seems wrong, but you can judge this better than me. If that's resolved I'm ok with you going ahead with this transition. Please ping me when it's uploaded, though, so that I can take care of the binNMUs. Kind regards Philipp Kern [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler-python/+bug/696025 Jakub mentioned on irc that the patch in [1] is wrong. There's an alternate patch shipped in the fedora package. I've attached this patch and hope the more python/poppler savvy people can take a look at it. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? diff -up pypoppler-0.12.1/poppler.defs.poppler15 pypoppler-0.12.1/poppler.defs --- pypoppler-0.12.1/poppler.defs.poppler15 2010-10-06 16:02:47.023101009 -0400 +++ pypoppler-0.12.1/poppler.defs 2010-10-06 16:10:32.749101000 -0400 @@ -1760,6 +1760,12 @@ (return-type int) ) +(define-method get_label + (of-object PopplerPage) + (c-name poppler_page_get_label) + (return-type gchar*) +) + (define-method get_duration (of-object PopplerPage) (c-name poppler_page_get_duration) @@ -1805,9 +1811,15 @@ (of-object PopplerPage) (c-name poppler_page_get_text) (return-type char*) +) + +(define-method get_selected_text + (of-object PopplerPage) + (c-name poppler_page_get_selected_text) + (return-type char*) (parameters '(PopplerSelectionStyle style) -'(PopplerRectangle* rect) +'(PopplerRectangle* selection) ) ) @@ -1895,6 +1907,16 @@ ) ) +(define-function poppler_page_add_annot + (of-object PopplerPage) + (c-name poppler_page_add_annot) + (return-type none) + (parameters +'(PopplerAnnot* annot) +'(GList* list) + ) +) + (define-method get_crop_box (of-object PopplerPage) (c-name poppler_page_get_crop_box) @@ -1904,6 +1926,16 @@ ) ) +(define-method get_text_layout + (of-object PopplerPage) + (c-name poppler_page_get_text_layout) + (return-type gboolean) + (parameters +'(PopplerRectangle** rectangles) +'(guint* n_rectangles) + ) +) + (define-function poppler_rectangle_get_type (c-name poppler_rectangle_get_type) (return-type GType) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.16.x transition. There are new versions of packages which start to require an updated Poppler, and our current version (0.12.x) is a bit old. Currently we have Poppler 0.16.3 in experimental already, and Poppler 0.16.6 is planned for unstable (same SONAMEs for libraries as 0.16.3). This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways: - libpoppler5 → libpoppler13 - libpoppler-glib4 → libpoppler-glib6 - libpoppler-qt2 -- qt3 frontend, dropped (no rdeps in testing sid) - libpoppler-qt4-3 -- BC with 0.12, but bumps shlibs Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition, and their situation, sorted by solutions: Sources that can be binNMU'ed: apvlv (poppler-glib) auto-multiple-choice (poppler) cups (poppler) epdfview (poppler-glib) gambas2 (poppler) gdcm (poppler) gimp (poppler-glib) gpdftext (poppler-glib) gnome-commander (poppler) gummi (poppler-glib) inkscape (poppler, poppler-glib) koffice (poppler) libreoffice (poppler) luatex (poppler) pdf-presenter-console (poppler-glib) pdf2djvu (poppler) pdf2svg (poppler-glib) pdfcube (poppler-glib) pdfgrep (poppler) pdftoipe (poppler) popplerkit.framework (poppler) referencer (poppler-glib) ruby-gnome2 (poppler-glib) texlive-bin (poppler) tracker (poppler-glib) tumbler (poppler-glib) xournal (poppler-glib) webkit2pdf (poppler-glib) zathura (poppler-glib) Sources that need a custom solution: * evince (poppler-glib) evince 2.30 does not support poppler-glib 0.16. The solution which Michael Biebl, Josselin Mouette and me discussed was to update to evince 2.32 (which though requires poppler 0.14, so cannot be uploaded right now) + a needed upstream patch to unstable, aside gnome-python-desktop 2.32 too (g-p-d 2.30 does not support evince 2.32). (Please note evince 2.23 would need to pass through NEW, and experimental has evince 3.x already.) * poppler-sharp (poppler-glib) This is an arch:all package, so it needs a sourceful upload. A couple of months ago, I talked with Chow Loong Jin (hyperair, CC'ed) on IRC about this transition, and he told me that he knew about this already, and he had to fix this manually, and to let him know about the transition time. This package has only one rdepend, pdfmod. * python-poppler (poppler-glib) The (small) patch needed to compile with poppler 0.16 is not compatible with poppler 0.12, so it cannot be uploaded right now. Asked to provide a version in experimental compilable with poppler 0.16, see #628047. * xpdf (poppler) The (small) patch needed to compile with poppler 0.16 is not compatible with poppler 0.12, so it cannot be uploaded right now. Asked to provide a version in experimental compilable with poppler 0.16, see #627667. Other cases: * derivations (poppler) This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of that application are left in the resulting arch:all package. This source can be left out of the transition. I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the following usertag: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=toscano.p...@tiscali.it;tag=poppler-0.16 Possible conflicts with other transitions: * inkscape is part of the current imagemagick4 transition (#625544) * poppler-sharp is a mono/CLI package, and I saw there is a transition tracker for a mono transition (but no transition bug open, yet?), so most probably this transition should be done before or after the mono one * webkit2pdf possibly could be in common with the asked (but not yet ack'ed, though) webkit transition (#622371) In the end, to help you according to other transition trackers: - affected packages: b-d on libpoppler-dev or libpoppler-glib-dev - bad packages: depends on libpoppler5 or libpoppler-glib4 - good packages: depends on libpoppler13 or libpoppler-glib6 Thanks, -- Pino -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
