Bug#64308: state of #64308
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:12:49AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Joey Hess wrote: I don't have comprehensive knowledge of every browser. The current version of lynx has support for the expires field (in addition to Max-Age). I'd still appreciate it if perl followed the actual RFC, even if every browser has support for the old spec. Ok, I just forwarded the report upstream. It might be worth pointing out here that there has been quite a bit of work on the upstream bug report https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=50576 including a request to review an implementaion of the Max-Age support you requested from a few months ago. Cheers, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#64308: state of #64308
Hello Joey, CGI::Cookie would lead you to belive it follows RFC 2109, when it says For full information on cookies see http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/rfc2109.txt I wouldn't read this as 'conforms to', nevertheless: CGI::Cookie uses only the old expires field that is in the old netscape cookies spec. This is still the case with Perl 5.10.1. Is it still a problem with any browser? Should I forward upstream the request to implement 'Max-Age' now? Note: For backward compatibility, the separator in the Cookie header is semi-colon (;) everywhere. A server should also accept comma (,) as the separator between cookie-values for future compatibility. This part works well for me in Perl 5.10.1. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#64308: state of #64308
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: CGI::Cookie would lead you to belive it follows RFC 2109, when it says For full information on cookies see http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/rfc2109.txt I wouldn't read this as 'conforms to', nevertheless: CGI::Cookie uses only the old expires field that is in the old netscape cookies spec. This is still the case with Perl 5.10.1. Is it still a problem with any browser? Should I forward upstream the request to implement 'Max-Age' now? I don't have comprehensive knowledge of every browser. The current version of lynx has support for the expires field (in addition to Max-Age). I'd still appreciate it if perl followed the actual RFC, even if every browser has support for the old spec. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#64308: state of #64308
package perl tags 64308 + confirmed forwarded 64308 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=50576 thanks Joey Hess wrote: I don't have comprehensive knowledge of every browser. The current version of lynx has support for the expires field (in addition to Max-Age). I'd still appreciate it if perl followed the actual RFC, even if every browser has support for the old spec. Ok, I just forwarded the report upstream. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
