Bug#661287: pytables testsuite failures on arm, armhf etc
> IMHO the best solution is to adopt Julian's patch for blosc disabling > and upload the new package to allow migration to testing. > Just let me know how to proceed. I guess that would indeed be the best resolution for now > I don't know if there is some special protocol/procedure for importing > changes from ubuntu. not the one I am aware off -- just extract from the total patch present in Ubuntu i.e. http://patches.ubuntu.com/p/pytables/pytables_2.3.1-2ubuntu3.patch and adjust to care about sparc as well > Maybe Julian would like to push the patch into debian-science directly. Julian -- would you like to join the team (Debian science) and help with maintenance of pytables in Debian? ;) ;) -- =--= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661287: pytables testsuite failures on arm, armhf etc
Hi Yaroslav, hi Julian, Il 03/03/2012 22:01, Yaroslav Halchenko ha scritto: > what would not work? disabling blosc? it would work I bet and thanks > for testing on a sparc64 system > > I just hoped that someone (upstream?) could find a chance to > resolve it "properly" ;) > Yaroslav, I doubt it can be done in short time. We (upstream) are all quite busy in this period. IMHO the best solution is to adopt Julian's patch for blosc disabling and upload the new package to allow migration to testing. Just let me know how to proceed. I don't know if there is some special protocol/procedure for importing changes from ubuntu. Maybe Julian would like to push the patch into debian-science directly. best regards >> On 03/03/2012 09:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: >>> are "going" across platforms? or should we may be adopt blosc >>> disabling patches from Julian first >>> sparc issue is still not resolved AFAIK > >>> I have pushed a tiny fix for typos with a close statement for 661287 >>> (CCed now) (if I got it right on what we are closing now ;) ) > > >> you will have to disable blosc if you want it to build on all arches, I >> did not look into fixing blosc as its more complicated and its probably >> performance critical code where adding slow hacks to remove unaligned >> accesses will likely break the whole benefit of it. >> This will have to be done upstream. > >> I built the ubuntu package on a sparc64 and it succeeded, from the logs >> it looks like the same issue as arm's (unaligned memory access). >> What makes you think it won't work? > > > > -- Antonio Valentino -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661287: pytables testsuite failures on arm, armhf etc
what would not work? disabling blosc? it would work I bet and thanks for testing on a sparc64 system I just hoped that someone (upstream?) could find a chance to resolve it "properly" ;) > On 03/03/2012 09:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > are "going" across platforms? or should we may be adopt blosc > > disabling patches from Julian first > > sparc issue is still not resolved AFAIK > > I have pushed a tiny fix for typos with a close statement for 661287 > > (CCed now) (if I got it right on what we are closing now ;) ) > you will have to disable blosc if you want it to build on all arches, I > did not look into fixing blosc as its more complicated and its probably > performance critical code where adding slow hacks to remove unaligned > accesses will likely break the whole benefit of it. > This will have to be done upstream. > I built the ubuntu package on a sparc64 and it succeeded, from the logs > it looks like the same issue as arm's (unaligned memory access). > What makes you think it won't work? -- =--= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661287: pytables testsuite failures on arm, armhf etc
On 03/03/2012 09:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Hi Antonio and Julian, > > Sorry for being silent/disconnected > > so -- what is the status -- should we meanwhile upload to see how things > are "going" across platforms? or should we may be adopt blosc > disabling patches from Julian first > sparc issue is still not resolved AFAIK > > I have pushed a tiny fix for typos with a close statement for 661287 > (CCed now) (if I got it right on what we are closing now ;) ) > you will have to disable blosc if you want it to build on all arches, I did not look into fixing blosc as its more complicated and its probably performance critical code where adding slow hacks to remove unaligned accesses will likely break the whole benefit of it. This will have to be done upstream. I built the ubuntu package on a sparc64 and it succeeded, from the logs it looks like the same issue as arm's (unaligned memory access). What makes you think it won't work? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#661287: pytables testsuite failures on arm, armhf etc
Hi Antonio and Julian, Sorry for being silent/disconnected so -- what is the status -- should we meanwhile upload to see how things are "going" across platforms? or should we may be adopt blosc disabling patches from Julian first sparc issue is still not resolved AFAIK I have pushed a tiny fix for typos with a close statement for 661287 (CCed now) (if I got it right on what we are closing now ;) ) > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/pytables_2.3.1-2ubuntu2.dsc > Thank you very much Julian, the patch is now applied upstream. > I'm going to backport the patch to the debian package ASAP. -- =--= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
