Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: It's being reviewed. And it's likely that some of the changes may be rejected. Re-uploaded with multiarch change dropped. Now in NEW again. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
It's still in DELAYED/1, though, just in case more issues are found. Not sure if you saw this, but this seemed to not reach unstable. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote: It's still in DELAYED/1, though, just in case more issues are found. Not sure if you saw this, but this seemed to not reach unstable. I forgot to update to the bug that it's currently in NEW, due to the split. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Michael Gilbert It's still in DELAYED/1, though, just in case more issues are found. Not sure if you saw this, but this seemed to not reach unstable. I forgot to update to the bug that it's currently in NEW, due to the split. Ftp masters don't process the NEW queue often during the freeze, so make sure to ping them and say that it fixes rc issues. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Michael Gilbert It's still in DELAYED/1, though, just in case more issues are found. Not sure if you saw this, but this seemed to not reach unstable. I forgot to update to the bug that it's currently in NEW, due to the split. Ftp masters don't process the NEW queue often during the freeze, so make sure to ping them and say that it fixes rc issues. It's being reviewed. And it's likely that some of the changes may be rejected. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: The gnome-themes-standard-common binary package is superfluous. Afaics the gettext translations are only required to translate the index.theme and background.xml files where the translations are directly embedded, so you don't actually need to install the .mo files. I would thus suggest to simply drop gnome-themes-standard-common. I had also found it out before seeing your message. So, I've cancelled the NMU. Anyway, I also stumbled upon this lintian info: I: gnome-themes-standard: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 3549kB 99% That made me plan to move the non-engine parts into -common instead. What do you think? Update: I've renamed -common to -data. Latest debdiff is attached. Re-uploaded to DELAYED/1. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-2.1.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
Le mercredi 07 novembre 2012 à 19:46 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan a écrit : Update: I've renamed -common to -data. Latest debdiff is attached. --- gnome-themes-standard-3.4.2/debian/gnome-themes-standard.install 1970-01-01 07:00:00.0 +0700 +++ gnome-themes-standard-3.4.2/debian/gnome-themes-standard.install 2012-11-06 19:56:54.0 +0700 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +usr/lib/gtk-3.0/3.0.0/theming-engines/*.so Isn’t it also time to move the engines to the multiarch path? Currently Adwaita is not usable by applications of a non-native architecture. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Isn’t it also time to move the engines to the multiarch path? Currently Adwaita is not usable by applications of a non-native architecture. Done. Please review the updated debdiff. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-2.1-multiarch.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
Le mercredi 07 novembre 2012 à 21:10 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan a écrit : On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Isn’t it also time to move the engines to the multiarch path? Currently Adwaita is not usable by applications of a non-native architecture. Done. Please review the updated debdiff. Awesome, thanks. The debdiff looks fine to me. Thanks for the thought of removing /usr/share/locale in the process, it was just dead weight. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Le mercredi 07 novembre 2012 à 21:10 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan a écrit : On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Isn’t it also time to move the engines to the multiarch path? Currently Adwaita is not usable by applications of a non-native architecture. Done. Please review the updated debdiff. Awesome, thanks. More update: add M-A: foreign to gnome-accessibility-themes (caught by lintian). It's still in DELAYED/1, though, just in case more issues are found. The debdiff looks fine to me. Thanks for the thought of removing /usr/share/locale in the process, it was just dead weight. Hope there wouldn't be message translation in the engine in the future. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-2.1-multiarch.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: So, I agree with splitting the gnome-accessibility-themes binary. Any progress? If not, I'm proposing another NMU, which: - Splits a11y themes into gnome-accessibility-themes binary - Splits the shared translation files into gnome-themes-standard-common - Makes both theme packages depend on -common - Declares gnome-accessibility-themes and gnome-themes-standard-common as Replaces: the old gnome-themes-standard - Drops Replaces: from gnome-themes-standard Debdiff is attached. However, some warnings are found during the upgrade test: ---8--- Preparing to replace gnome-themes-standard 3.4.2-1 (using gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-1.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gnome-themes-standard ... dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/HighContrast': Directory not empty dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/LowContrast': Directory not empty dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/HighContrastInverse': Directory not empty ---8--- The remaining files in these directories are icon-theme.cache. Any suggestion on how to clear them properly? It seems this does not happen with clean installs. So, it may not be an issue. Could I do the NMU, then? Uploaded to DELAYED/2. Without response for a long time, I assume it's qualified NMU, despite the intrusive change. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On 06.11.2012 12:05, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: So, I agree with splitting the gnome-accessibility-themes binary. Any progress? If not, I'm proposing another NMU, which: - Splits a11y themes into gnome-accessibility-themes binary - Splits the shared translation files into gnome-themes-standard-common - Makes both theme packages depend on -common - Declares gnome-accessibility-themes and gnome-themes-standard-common as Replaces: the old gnome-themes-standard - Drops Replaces: from gnome-themes-standard Debdiff is attached. However, some warnings are found during the upgrade test: ---8--- Preparing to replace gnome-themes-standard 3.4.2-1 (using gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-1.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gnome-themes-standard ... dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/HighContrast': Directory not empty dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/LowContrast': Directory not empty dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/HighContrastInverse': Directory not empty ---8--- The remaining files in these directories are icon-theme.cache. Any suggestion on how to clear them properly? It seems this does not happen with clean installs. So, it may not be an issue. Could I do the NMU, then? Uploaded to DELAYED/2. Without response for a long time, I assume it's qualified NMU, despite the intrusive change. The gnome-themes-standard-common binary package is superfluous. Afaics the gettext translations are only required to translate the index.theme and background.xml files where the translations are directly embedded, so you don't actually need to install the .mo files. I would thus suggest to simply drop gnome-themes-standard-common. Please also make gnome-theme-standard depend on gnome-accessibility-themes. Also, gnome-accessibility-themes needs a Breaks along with the Replaces. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: The gnome-themes-standard-common binary package is superfluous. Afaics the gettext translations are only required to translate the index.theme and background.xml files where the translations are directly embedded, so you don't actually need to install the .mo files. I would thus suggest to simply drop gnome-themes-standard-common. I had also found it out before seeing your message. So, I've cancelled the NMU. Anyway, I also stumbled upon this lintian info: I: gnome-themes-standard: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 3549kB 99% That made me plan to move the non-engine parts into -common instead. What do you think? Please also make gnome-theme-standard depend on gnome-accessibility-themes. OK. I didn't think normal users want those a11y themes, so I hadn't added the dependency. Will do it now as you suggest, anyway. Also, gnome-accessibility-themes needs a Breaks along with the Replaces. OK. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: The gnome-themes-standard-common binary package is superfluous. Afaics the gettext translations are only required to translate the index.theme and background.xml files where the translations are directly embedded, so you don't actually need to install the .mo files. I would thus suggest to simply drop gnome-themes-standard-common. I had also found it out before seeing your message. So, I've cancelled the NMU. Anyway, I also stumbled upon this lintian info: I: gnome-themes-standard: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 3549kB 99% That made me plan to move the non-engine parts into -common instead. What do you think? Please also make gnome-theme-standard depend on gnome-accessibility-themes. OK. I didn't think normal users want those a11y themes, so I hadn't added the dependency. Will do it now as you suggest, anyway. Also, gnome-accessibility-themes needs a Breaks along with the Replaces. OK. Re-uploaded to DELAYED/2. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: Re-uploaded to DELAYED/2. The debdiff. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-2.1.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#661471: NMU v2 (was: Re: Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes)
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: So, I agree with splitting the gnome-accessibility-themes binary. Any progress? If not, I'm proposing another NMU, which: - Splits a11y themes into gnome-accessibility-themes binary - Splits the shared translation files into gnome-themes-standard-common - Makes both theme packages depend on -common - Declares gnome-accessibility-themes and gnome-themes-standard-common as Replaces: the old gnome-themes-standard - Drops Replaces: from gnome-themes-standard Debdiff is attached. However, some warnings are found during the upgrade test: ---8--- Preparing to replace gnome-themes-standard 3.4.2-1 (using gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-1.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gnome-themes-standard ... dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/HighContrast': Directory not empty dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/LowContrast': Directory not empty dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/HighContrastInverse': Directory not empty ---8--- The remaining files in these directories are icon-theme.cache. Any suggestion on how to clear them properly? It seems this does not happen with clean installs. So, it may not be an issue. Could I do the NMU, then? Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: So, I agree with splitting the gnome-accessibility-themes binary. Any progress? If not, I'm proposing another NMU, which: - Splits a11y themes into gnome-accessibility-themes binary - Splits the shared translation files into gnome-themes-standard-common - Makes both theme packages depend on -common - Declares gnome-accessibility-themes and gnome-themes-standard-common as Replaces: the old gnome-themes-standard - Drops Replaces: from gnome-themes-standard Debdiff is attached. However, some warnings are found during the upgrade test: ---8--- Preparing to replace gnome-themes-standard 3.4.2-1 (using gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-1.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gnome-themes-standard ... dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/HighContrast': Directory not empty dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/LowContrast': Directory not empty dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/icons/HighContrastInverse': Directory not empty ---8--- The remaining files in these directories are icon-theme.cache. Any suggestion on how to clear them properly? Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-1.1.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:11:30 Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Tue Jul 10, 2012 at 14:34:34 theppi...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: I think the alternative Martin proposed is to build gnome-accessibility-themes from the gnome-themes-standard source package. I have also tried it already, but it required the outdated gtk-engines-3.pc. See message #28 in the bug log. I believe you misunderstand. In Ubuntu almost a year ago, I split gnome-themes-standard into two binary packages: gnome-themes-standard and gnome-accessibility-themes. We then dropped the abandoned-upstream gnome-themes source package that used to provide gnome-accessibility-themes. It works pretty well for Ubuntu as we want to ship the HighContrast themes but not Adwaita due to space You're right. I missed the from the gnome-themes-standard source package part in Michael's message. Sorry. So, I agree with splitting the gnome-accessibility-themes binary. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: bug 661471 gnome-accessibility-themes
On Tue Jul 10, 2012 at 14:34:34 theppi...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: I think the alternative Martin proposed is to build gnome-accessibility-themes from the gnome-themes-standard source package. I have also tried it already, but it required the outdated gtk-engines-3.pc. See message #28 in the bug log. I believe you misunderstand. In Ubuntu almost a year ago, I split gnome-themes-standard into two binary packages: gnome-themes-standard and gnome-accessibility-themes. We then dropped the abandoned-upstream gnome-themes source package that used to provide gnome-accessibility-themes. It works pretty well for Ubuntu as we want to ship the HighContrast themes but not Adwaita due to space limitations. Jeremy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: Bug #661471
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan t...@debian.org wrote: So, let's add Breaks: gnome-accessibility-themes ( 3.0)? Packages affected by this Breaks and the absence of (gnome-accessibility-themes = 3.0) would be: - arista (Depends) - Not a big deal, as g-a-t is just an alternative dependency, and can by satisfied by, say, gnome-icon-theme. - education-desktop-gnome (Recommends) I don't know how Debian GNOME team thinks about packaging g-a-t 3.0.0, the latest upstream version, as upstream has stopped shipping it since 3.2, and Debian now ships GNOME 3.4. No, it's impossible to package g-a-t 3.0.0 now, as it requires the outdated gtk-engines-3.pc. If it's to be dropped, let's file bugs against the two packages above to remove the dependencies. This may not be necessary, either. Those two packages may assume old environment and may be installed without gnome-themes-standard (e.g. on LXDE). So, let's just add the Breaks. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661471: Bug #661471
So, let's add Breaks: gnome-accessibility-themes ( 3.0)? Packages affected by this Breaks and the absence of (gnome-accessibility-themes = 3.0) would be: - arista (Depends) - Not a big deal, as g-a-t is just an alternative dependency, and can by satisfied by, say, gnome-icon-theme. - education-desktop-gnome (Recommends) I don't know how Debian GNOME team thinks about packaging g-a-t 3.0.0, the latest upstream version, as upstream has stopped shipping it since 3.2, and Debian now ships GNOME 3.4. If it's to be dropped, let's file bugs against the two packages above to remove the dependencies. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
