Bug#662001: singular: should this package be removed?
On 04/03/12 15:06, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > * Simon McVittie [120304 14:29]: >> which now builds fine on amd64. > > I'm confused what "now" means here. Did it magically vanish somehow? > Or is there a new version not recorded in the BTS? The patch on #646456 prepares an NMU, which gregor herrmann was going to sponsor, but then decided against when it didn't build on amd64. I tried rebuilding with the same patch and it built, but some of the tests failed (#662002) and I have no way to judge how significant that is, so I didn't sponsor it either. S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662001: singular: should this package be removed?
On 03/03/12 17:07, Tim Abbott wrote: > Bernhard Link has been organizing a group of folks to take over > maintaining this package. Great! Please consider starting by sponsoring/applying Mònica's NMU (see the bugs for details), which now builds fine on amd64. S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662001: singular: should this package be removed?
Hi Simon, Bernhard Link has been organizing a group of folks to take over maintaining this package. Also, I should mention it is not primarily a library -- the main use case for singular is a command-line repl for doing mathematical calculations; the library version is only used by the sagemath software (not currently in Debian). So I'd recommend against removing the package at this time. -Tim Abbott On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Simon McVittie wrote: > Package: singular > Version: 3-0-4-3.dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: proposed-removal > > singular seems like a possible candidate for removal from Debian: > > * library with no reverse dependencies > * no maintainer upload since 2009 > * no maintainer response to an RC bug for several months > * assorted linking problems (see the patches from Mònica's attempted NMU) > > If you don't think this package is needed any more, please send the > following commands to cont...@bugs.debian.org, replacing nn with this > bug's number: > > severity nn normal > reassign nn ftp.debian.org > retitle nn RM: -- RoM; > thanks > > Alternatively, please keep up with fixing it. > > For more information, see > http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals > http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt > > Regards, > smcv > > >
Bug#662001: singular: should this package be removed?
Package: singular Version: 3-0-4-3.dfsg-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal singular seems like a possible candidate for removal from Debian: * library with no reverse dependencies * no maintainer upload since 2009 * no maintainer response to an RC bug for several months * assorted linking problems (see the patches from Mònica's attempted NMU) If you don't think this package is needed any more, please send the following commands to cont...@bugs.debian.org, replacing nn with this bug's number: severity nn normal reassign nn ftp.debian.org retitle nn RM: -- RoM; thanks Alternatively, please keep up with fixing it. For more information, see http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt Regards, smcv -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
