Bug#679816: unblock: kyotocabinet/1.2.76-2
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 12:43:26 -0700, shawn wrote: If the default behavior is to not have kyotocabinet in wheezy, then I am OK with that. I think this is the way to go. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#679816: unblock: kyotocabinet/1.2.76-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package kyotocabinet - -1 that got uploaded has the -dev package not depending on the shared library which is RC Bug #679683 - -2 now has a proper configure check for 8 byte atomics instead of a hard-coded list, which means it now works on mips and powerpc through configuring these out (any maybe others, the buildds havn't finished on -1) If -2 cannot be unblocked, (and sponsored) 1.2.76-1 (which is the first version of this package in Debian), should not be part of Wheezy. unblock kyotocabinet/1.2.76-2 http://mentors.debian.net/package/kyotocabinet -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (101, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) Kernel: Linux 3.4.0-tomoyo-6-gfd64aac (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679816: unblock: kyotocabinet/1.2.76-2
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 19:06 +, shawn wrote: Please unblock package kyotocabinet We can't unblock something that hasn't been uploaded. - -1 that got uploaded has the -dev package not depending on the shared library which is RC Bug #679683 - -2 now has a proper configure check for 8 byte atomics instead of a hard-coded list, which means it now works on mips and powerpc through configuring these out (any maybe others, the buildds havn't finished on -1) If -2 cannot be unblocked, (and sponsored) 1.2.76-1 (which is the first version of this package in Debian), should not be part of Wheezy. We'd need to see a diff against -1 to know if it might be suitable. See http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html for further details, as referenced in the d-d-a mail. Looking further, it appears that kyotocabinet is currently not in wheezy at all? In that case -1 only got an unblock initially because it was in unstable in time (having been accepted from NEW the day before the freeze); we might need a little more convincing that -2 should get one having turned out to be buggy so quickly. (Well, I might, ommv...) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679816: unblock: kyotocabinet/1.2.76-2
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 20:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 19:06 +, shawn wrote: If -2 cannot be unblocked, (and sponsored) 1.2.76-1 (which is the first version of this package in Debian), should not be part of Wheezy. We'd need to see a diff against -1 to know if it might be suitable. See http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html for further details, as referenced in the d-d-a mail. Looking further, it appears that kyotocabinet is currently not in wheezy at all? In that case -1 only got an unblock initially because it was in unstable in time (having been accepted from NEW the day before the freeze); we might need a little more convincing that -2 should get one having turned out to be buggy so quickly. (Well, I might, ommv...) Well, the RC bug (which I reported) was fixed very early in mentors, (all with same version number) but apparently the later version did not get uploaded. I could not download what was in NEW, but I did notice immediately after it got accepted. If the default behavior is to not have kyotocabinet in wheezy, then I am OK with that. -- -Shawn Landden -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
