Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 01/12/13 10:46, Julien Cristau wrote: > aqualung's dependencies don't match that as far as I can tell. Okay thanks. I'm misinterpreting the PTS: > dep: libavcodec52 (>= 4:0.5.1-1) [hppa] > Libav codec library > or libavcodec-extra-52 (>= 4:0.5.1-1) > Package not available I assumed the libavcodec-extra-52 dependency was the one for [not hppa]. In fact the aqualung binary package has no libav dependency in sid, since choking on the last libav transition. The build system didn't fail on this, and produced a package without libav functionality. So it is really not affected by the latest libav9 transition. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 21:41:01 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi, > > The tracker for this transition[0] doesn't show either good or bad > status for package aqualung. In fact it still uses the old libav and > requires an NMU, but it will FTBFS with the new version. [I plan to > prepare an NMU fixing this and another RC bug]. > > [0]: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libav9.html > > aqualung's dependencies refer to packages matching > /lib(avcodec-extra-53|avformat-extra-53|avutil-extra-51)/ > is that bad/unexpected? Could other packages have been missed? > aqualung's dependencies don't match that as far as I can tell. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 21:46:04 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Also,,, package sox doesn't show good/bad status. But it depends on an > older libav matching /lib(avcodec52|avformat52|avutil50)/ > > See http://packages.debian.org/sid/libsox-fmt-ffmpeg > > Was it missed during a previous soname transition? Could/should the > libav9 tracker be updated to match on this as Bad? > That package is not in sid. The above page only lists it for hppa on debian-ports. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Also,,, package sox doesn't show good/bad status. But it depends on an older libav matching /lib(avcodec52|avformat52|avutil50)/ See http://packages.debian.org/sid/libsox-fmt-ffmpeg Was it missed during a previous soname transition? Could/should the libav9 tracker be updated to match on this as Bad? Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Hi, The tracker for this transition[0] doesn't show either good or bad status for package aqualung. In fact it still uses the old libav and requires an NMU, but it will FTBFS with the new version. [I plan to prepare an NMU fixing this and another RC bug]. [0]: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libav9.html aqualung's dependencies refer to packages matching /lib(avcodec-extra-53|avformat-extra-53|avutil-extra-51)/ is that bad/unexpected? Could other packages have been missed? Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 2013-09-30 22:18:44, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 20:26:30 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > vxl is affected by #718047. > > > Why doesn't vxl stop using --as-needed? Ask that the vxl maintainers? (CCing them) Hey vxl maintainers, vxl currently fails to build on ia64 due to #718047. Could you please disable --as-needed on ia64 until this issue is fixed so that vxl can be built against libav9 on all architectures? Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Julien Cristau writes: > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:38:33 +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> A recent change in a build dependency (libmodplug 1:0.8.8.4-4[1]) of >> xmms2 make it FTBS[2]. As it is part of the libav transition and already >> have been rebuilt for it, I wanted to have you OK to upload the fixed >> version now >> > I'm hoping to get new libav and most of its rdeps migrated within the > next couple of days. Can you check back after that (or just upload > after you see xmms2 0.8+dfsg-6+b1 in testing)? Okay. I will wait. -- Rémi Vanicat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 20:26:30 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > dvd-slideshow, dvdwizard, tribler and videotrans still depend on ffmpeg. > dvd-slideshow would make a good removal candidate. #710411 is open since May > and > has not received a reply from the maintainer. > > dvdwizard and videotrans appear on the list of auto-removal candidates. > tribler > has been uploaded recently but still depends on ffmpeg. > I've added removal hints for those 4, thanks. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 20:26:30 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > dvd-slideshow, dvdwizard, tribler and videotrans still depend on ffmpeg. > dvd-slideshow would make a good removal candidate. #710411 is open since May > and > has not received a reply from the maintainer. > > dvdwizard and videotrans appear on the list of auto-removal candidates. > tribler > has been uploaded recently but still depends on ffmpeg. > So, err, dvd-slideshow, dvdwizard and videotrans have the same Maintainer as libav. How is this still unfixed? If these packages are unmaintained, can the pkg-multimedia team please take care of cleaning up its cruft? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:38:33 +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote: > Hello, > > A recent change in a build dependency (libmodplug 1:0.8.8.4-4[1]) of > xmms2 make it FTBS[2]. As it is part of the libav transition and already > have been rebuilt for it, I wanted to have you OK to upload the fixed > version now > I'm hoping to get new libav and most of its rdeps migrated within the next couple of days. Can you check back after that (or just upload after you see xmms2 0.8+dfsg-6+b1 in testing)? Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 20:26:30 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > vxl is affected by #718047. > Why doesn't vxl stop using --as-needed? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Control: unblock -1 by 694143 694131 718125 721148 721047 713197 720814 (Removing bugs of packages no longer in testing from the list of blocking bugs.) Some weeks have passed and we are down to the following bugs: #720783 dvswitch (with patch) #720796 gsteamer0.10-ffmpeg (patch WIP) #720816 openscenegraph #722486 spek #722610 yorick-av #723099 taoframework (with patch) vxl is affected by #718047. dvd-slideshow, dvdwizard, tribler and videotrans still depend on ffmpeg. dvd-slideshow would make a good removal candidate. #710411 is open since May and has not received a reply from the maintainer. dvdwizard and videotrans appear on the list of auto-removal candidates. tribler has been uploaded recently but still depends on ffmpeg. Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Hello, A recent change in a build dependency (libmodplug 1:0.8.8.4-4[1]) of xmms2 make it FTBS[2]. As it is part of the libav transition and already have been rebuilt for it, I wanted to have you OK to upload the fixed version now Note that xmms2 is also part of the liboost[3] transition, and do not have yet been rebuilt for it, and this is also related to the ruby1.8-removal[4] [1]:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652139 [2]:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724487 [3]:http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.54.html [4]:http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby1.8-removal.html -- Rémi Vanicat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 09/11/2013 06:02 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:06:03PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > Hi, > two more testing removals related to the libav9 transition: > > - libavg 1.7.1-3 fails to build for unrelated boost reasons. Popcon is > virtually non-existant. Well the patch for boost problem is uploaded into debian (built in a jessie chroot / against older libav that is). Such that to prevent erroneous FTBFS attribution to earlier boost failure in the build process. This was available since August 27th in Ubuntu, but not uploaded into debian as I couldn't build the package in sid as it FTBFS against libav 9. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with libav API changes to port libavg, I'll poke upstream about it, but at the moment I'm tagging "libavg FTBFS against libav 9" bug with "help". Is there a libav 9 porting guide available somewhere? Or can someone help out with a patch to fix libav 9 FTBFS? Also, why did libavg was removed from testing? Was it actually blocking any removals from the archive and/or transitions? As far as I can see all libraries that libavg binaries are linked against are still present in sid. This haste removal seems inconsistent to me w.r.t. how other transitions & library removals are handled by the release team. ps. Popcon is virtually non-existant because virtually libavg has only been recently reintroduced in debian after having been away for a long time. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 14:42:36 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2013-09-06 16:03:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > dependency level 2: > > > > with patch: > > #693106 xine-lib > > xine-lib has been fixed and built everywhere. Please schedule binNMUs > for mlt. > Scheduled. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 2013-09-06 16:03:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > dependency level 2: > > with patch: > #693106 xine-lib xine-lib has been fixed and built everywhere. Please schedule binNMUs for mlt. Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 09/11/2013 06:02 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:06:03PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > Hi, > two more testing removals related to the libav9 transition: > > - libavg 1.7.1-3 fails to build for unrelated boost reasons. Popcon is > virtually non-existant. > > - imageshack-uploader 2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-5.1 patch is available for > libav9, but FTBFS > for weird qmake reasons. Popcon is marginal. Removal hints added. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:06:03PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Hi, two more testing removals related to the libav9 transition: - libavg 1.7.1-3 fails to build for unrelated boost reasons. Popcon is virtually non-existant. - imageshack-uploader 2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-5.1 patch is available for libav9, but FTBFS for weird qmake reasons. Popcon is marginal. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#720814: Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 09/06/2013 05:06 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Sebastian Ramacher schrieb: >> #720814 motion Scheduled for removal from testing. >> Since libav dropped the (transitional?) ffmpeg package, we have some more >> packages that need to be ported / fixed: >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=3Dffmpeg-removal;users=3Dp= >> kg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > avbin should be removed from testing as well. Only a single maintainer > upload back in 2009 and only driven by NMUs since then. Also no revdeps > and marginal popcon. As avbin is in the deferred queue fixing its RC bugs, it can stay for now. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 09/06/2013 04:03 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > The binNMUs for performous failed on ia64, mips(el) and s390(x) due to > #721577. Could they be given back please? On mips(el) boost 1.54.0-3 is > not yet installed, so a dep-wait is needed there. given back and dep-wait set. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 09/06/2013 02:37 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2013-09-04 18:57:17, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 17:31:34 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >> >>> I've successfully rebuild acoustid-fingerprinter 0.6-1 against libav9. >>> >>> Can you trigger a binNMU? >> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 17:47:29 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >> >>> kid3 also builds successfully. Could binNMUs for it be scheduled too? >>> >> Both scheduled. > > Thank you. > > Could you also schedule binNMUs for vdr-plugin-xineliboutput please? Scheduled. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
[Dies ist die Kopie einer Nachricht, die in die Gruppe gmane.linux.debian.devel.release gepostet wurde.] Sebastian Ramacher schrieb: > #720814 motion Should be removed from testing IMO. Has only seen NMUs since two years. > #721026 renpy (fixed upstram) I'll take care of that in the next days. > no patch, not pending: > #720824 opal (seems to be fixed in experimental) See the maintainer followup: | Note that ekiga does not yet work with opal/experimental, so opal | cannot go to unstable right now. > Since libav dropped the (transitional?) ffmpeg package, we have some more > packages that need to be ported / fixed: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=3Dffmpeg-removal;users=3Dp= > kg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org avbin should be removed from testing as well. Only a single maintainer upload back in 2009 and only driven by NMUs since then. Also no revdeps and marginal popcon. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Here is a status update which is saldy not that good looking: dependency level 1: with patch: #720810 miro pending: #692980 electricsheep #720785 ffmpegthumbnailer #721025 spek #721164 avbin no patch, not pending: #692809 audacity #694143 ffmpeg-php #713197 imageshack-uploader (apparently Ubuntu has a patch for that) #720668 linphone #720783 dvswitch (patches for boost 1.54 and libav 9 support sent to upstream mailing list, but still broken because of changes in liblivemedia) #720814 motion #721026 renpy (fixed upstram) #721047 libavg #721148 imageshack-uploader dependency level 2: with patch: #693106 xine-lib pending: #677959 mediatomb (waiting for ffmpegthumbnailer) no patch, not pending: #713354 visp #720796 gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg dependency level 3: no patch, not pending: #720816 openscenegraph dependency level 4: no patch, not pending: #720824 opal (seems to be fixed in experimental) dependency level 5: no patch, not pending: #720661 kino #720828 transcode The binNMUs for performous failed on ia64, mips(el) and s390(x) due to #721577. Could they be given back please? On mips(el) boost 1.54.0-3 is not yet installed, so a dep-wait is needed there. audacity and transcode are in a very sad state. They have a huge popcon, but transcode is dead upstream and the upcoming audacity release still lacks libav 9 support. As far as I know Benjamin Drung wanted to look at the audacity issue. ffmpeg-php also has a huge popcon but I didn't investigate that any further. libavg looks like it could be removed from testing temporarily. It has a low popcon and no reverse dependencies. imageshack-uploader might be be a candidate too (it's also dead upstream) opencv and openscenegraph started their own transitions. At least opencv is broken (#721894). gegl is broken if built with libav 9 (#721718). Since libav dropped the (transitional?) ffmpeg package, we have some more packages that need to be ported / fixed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ffmpeg-removal;users=pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Regards -- cebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 2013-09-04 18:57:17, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 17:31:34 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > I've successfully rebuild acoustid-fingerprinter 0.6-1 against libav9. > > > > Can you trigger a binNMU? > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 17:47:29 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > kid3 also builds successfully. Could binNMUs for it be scheduled too? > > > Both scheduled. Thank you. Could you also schedule binNMUs for vdr-plugin-xineliboutput please? Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 17:31:34 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > I've successfully rebuild acoustid-fingerprinter 0.6-1 against libav9. > > Can you trigger a binNMU? On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 17:47:29 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > kid3 also builds successfully. Could binNMUs for it be scheduled too? > Both scheduled. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 2013-09-04 17:31:34, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:54:43PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 transitions. > > > Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized? > > I've successfully rebuild acoustid-fingerprinter 0.6-1 against libav9. > > Can you trigger a binNMU? kid3 also builds successfully. Could binNMUs for it be scheduled too? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:54:43PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 transitions. > > Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized? I've successfully rebuild acoustid-fingerprinter 0.6-1 against libav9. Can you trigger a binNMU? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 15:31:44 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > On 08/31/2013 02:54 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 transitions. > >> Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized? > > > > I've successfully rebuild vxl against current sid/libav9. Can you schedule > > a binNMU for vxl 1.17.0-5 ? > > The failed binNMUs given back. > Doesn't work, see 721493. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 08/31/2013 02:54 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >> A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 transitions. >> Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized? > > I've successfully rebuild vxl against current sid/libav9. Can you schedule > a binNMU for vxl 1.17.0-5 ? The failed binNMUs given back. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 transitions. > Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized? I've successfully rebuild vxl against current sid/libav9. Can you schedule a binNMU for vxl 1.17.0-5 ? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#709039: Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
shirish शिरीष (2013-08-31): > Any update on getting the three packages from experimental to unstable. You're mailing 709039@ which is assigned to the release team; you want to contact the relevant maintainers instead. Mraw, KiBi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#709039: Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Hi all, Any update on getting the three packages from experimental to unstable. I am guessing these are the experimental versions which need to come down to sid/unstable. $ apt-cache policy libopencv-core2.4 libopencv-core2.4: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2.4.6.1+dfsg-0exp1 Version table: 2.4.6.1+dfsg-0exp1 0 1 http://debian.ec.as6453.net/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages $ apt-cache policy libopencv-core2.3 libopencv-core2.3: Installed: 2.3.1-12 Candidate: 2.3.1-12 Version table: *** 2.3.1-12 0 600 http://debian.ec.as6453.net/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages 1 http://debian.ec.as6453.net/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status As a user who likes multimedia a bit, awaiting for the transition to happen and see these packages in testing. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Sorry for spamming the list with BTS noise. All the FTBFS bugs from dependency level 1 should be filed now and most of them be marked as blocker of the transition bug. I hope I didn't miss any. Also thanks to David for the rebuild! Here is a rough overview of the current state (depedency level 1): With patch: #692980 electricsheep #694131 zoneminder #694299 shotdetect Marked as pending: #720785 ffmpegthumbnailer Fixed in experimental, awaiting upload to unstable: #692912 chromaprint #720826 wxsvg Without patch, not pending, not fixed in experimental: #692809 audacity #693560 qutecom (has a partial patch) #694143 ffmpeg-php #707411 zoneminder #713197 imageshack-uploader #713276 gnash #718125 libvalhalla #720668 linphone #720727 dff #720779 amide #720781 cmus #720783 dvswitch #720790 forked-daapd #720797 libphash #720805 lives #720808 gst-libav1.0 #720810 miro #720814 motion #720820 lynkeos.app #720823 jugglemaster #721025 spek #721026 renpy I don't know if all the packages in dependency level 2 have been checked, but that's the current state: With patch: #677959 mediatomb #693106 xine-lib #720809 dvbcut Without patch: #713354 visp #720796 gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Control: block -1 by 720809 720808 720796 720823 720799 720797 720805 Control: block -1 by 720820 720810 720814 720824 720816 720828 720826 dvbcut #720809 gst-libav1.0 #720808 gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg #720796 jugglemaster #720823 k3b #720799 libphash #720797 lives #720805 lynkeos.app #720820 miro #720810 motion #720814 opal #720824 openscenegraph #720816 transcode #720828 wxsvg #720826 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 16:18:38 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > > Since libx264 is largely subsumed by libav, I think it makes very > > > > much sense to do them both at the same time. I am convinced that we > > > > will have less effort this way. > > > > > > > OK, feel free to go ahead with both. > > > > (As discussed with Reinhard) > > > > Please add > > > > remove mplayer/2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1 > > > trying: -mplayer > skipped: -mplayer (12 <- 73) > got: 5+0: i-5 > * i386: devede, photofilmstrip, toonloop > > Should those rdeps be removed too? > All three packages depend on mencoder, which has been deprecated and is essentially unmaintained by upstream for years. As I do have strong concerns that mencoder makes it for jessie release, I would suggest to remove mencoder, and all depending packages such as devede, photofilmstrip or toonloop, for now until some solution is found in order to speed up the libav9 transition. -- regards, Reinhard
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 16:18:38 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > Since libx264 is largely subsumed by libav, I think it makes very > > > much sense to do them both at the same time. I am convinced that we > > > will have less effort this way. > > > > > OK, feel free to go ahead with both. > > (As discussed with Reinhard) > > Please add > > remove mplayer/2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1 > trying: -mplayer skipped: -mplayer (12 <- 73) got: 5+0: i-5 * i386: devede, photofilmstrip, toonloop Should those rdeps be removed too? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
> > Since libx264 is largely subsumed by libav, I think it makes very > > much sense to do them both at the same time. I am convinced that we > > will have less effort this way. > > > OK, feel free to go ahead with both. (As discussed with Reinhard) Please add remove mplayer/2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1 Mplayer needs more changes to be compatible with current libav and has problems with other external libs (#708140). It can be fixed later or maybe replaced by mpv/mplayer2. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Di, Aug 13, 2013 at 14:30:03 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:56:46 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> On 13.08.2013 11:48, Julien Cristau wrote: >> >On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 07:45:40 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> > >> >>Package: release.debian.org >> >>Severity: normal >> >>User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> >>Usertags: transition >> >> >> >>I would like to upload Libav 9 to unstable at your earliest >> >>convinience. To get an overview about the size and impact of the >> >>transition, I would like to drag your attention to the Ubuntu >> >>transition tracker page here: >> >> >> >>http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/libav.html >> >> >> >A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 >> >transitions. >> >Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized? >> >> Since libx264 is largely subsumed by libav, I think it makes very >> much sense to do them both at the same time. I am convinced that we >> will have less effort this way. >> > OK, feel free to go ahead with both. I'm currently uploading libav9 to unstable, but I head to weaken the dependencies for libx264, opencv and frei0r, which all (but frei0r) in turn require libav9 to build AFAIUI: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libav.git;a=commit;h=79cad71e56cb2ff50631558f663c8582469a0460 Next steps involve bringing these three packages from experimental to unstable, and then rebuild libav against them. I'll contact you if binNMUs of libav9 are possible, or if a sourceful upload is necessary anyways. In any case, thank you for scheduling this transition and your great work on bringing jessie along! Cheers, Reinhard -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:56:46 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On 13.08.2013 11:48, Julien Cristau wrote: > >On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 07:45:40 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > >>Package: release.debian.org > >>Severity: normal > >>User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > >>Usertags: transition > >> > >>I would like to upload Libav 9 to unstable at your earliest > >>convinience. To get an overview about the size and impact of the > >>transition, I would like to drag your attention to the Ubuntu > >>transition tracker page here: > >> > >>http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/libav.html > >> > >A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 > >transitions. > >Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized? > > Since libx264 is largely subsumed by libav, I think it makes very > much sense to do them both at the same time. I am convinced that we > will have less effort this way. > OK, feel free to go ahead with both. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 13.08.2013 11:48, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 07:45:40 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I would like to upload Libav 9 to unstable at your earliest convinience. To get an overview about the size and impact of the transition, I would like to drag your attention to the Ubuntu transition tracker page here: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/libav.html A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 transitions. Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized? Since libx264 is largely subsumed by libav, I think it makes very much sense to do them both at the same time. I am convinced that we will have less effort this way. Cheers, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 07:45:40 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > I would like to upload Libav 9 to unstable at your earliest > convinience. To get an overview about the size and impact of the > transition, I would like to drag your attention to the Ubuntu > transition tracker page here: > > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/libav.html > A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 transitions. Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> Procedural question: Are these bugs blockers to start the transition? >> Does the release team require all of them to be fixed in experimental >> (via MU or NMUs) before uploading libav9 to unstable? >> > Not necessarily, but we'd like to know they're not going to sit unfixed > for months. So at least having a patch tag would be good. I've revisted all those blockers, and all have a patch provided with two notable exceptions: - audacity, for which I know that Benjamin is working on that - quotecom, which had its last maintainer update in 2011, I'd suggest to remove it from testing for now. Any chance we can start the transition soon? -- regards, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:11:05 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > Control: block -1 by 692980 694131 693560 693639 693641 692809 692505 > > > > For the record, the following packages are known to FTBFS against libav > > 9: > > > > audacious-plugins: #692505 > > audacity: #692809 > > electricsheep: #692980 > > qutecom: #693560 > > vice: #693641 > > vtk: #693639 > > zoneminder: #694131 > > > > Setting them as blockers to keep track. > > Procedural question: Are these bugs blockers to start the transition? > Does the release team require all of them to be fixed in experimental > (via MU or NMUs) before uploading libav9 to unstable? > Not necessarily, but we'd like to know they're not going to sit unfixed for months. So at least having a patch tag would be good. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: block -1 by 692980 694131 693560 693639 693641 692809 692505 > > For the record, the following packages are known to FTBFS against libav > 9: > > audacious-plugins: #692505 > audacity: #692809 > electricsheep: #692980 > qutecom: #693560 > vice: #693641 > vtk: #693639 > zoneminder: #694131 > > Setting them as blockers to keep track. Procedural question: Are these bugs blockers to start the transition? Does the release team require all of them to be fixed in experimental (via MU or NMUs) before uploading libav9 to unstable? -- regards, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Control: block -1 by 692980 694131 693560 693639 693641 692809 692505 For the record, the following packages are known to FTBFS against libav 9: audacious-plugins: #692505 audacity: #692809 electricsheep: #692980 qutecom: #693560 vice: #693641 vtk: #693639 zoneminder: #694131 Setting them as blockers to keep track. Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I would like to upload Libav 9 to unstable at your earliest convinience. To get an overview about the size and impact of the transition, I would like to drag your attention to the Ubuntu transition tracker page here: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/libav.html Note that the transition has not started yet, most of the packages have already been transitioned either in experimental or, on the ubuntu side, the motumedia PPA. The transition parameters also apply to debian, so I'd really appreciate if you could setup a similar page on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ as well. Congratualations on the wheezy release and Cheers, Reinhard -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.7 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
