Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
Ivo De Decker wrote: > > According to recent discussions, there should be a 0.48.5 pending. > > We may also want to wait for it (IIRC that was the original plan). > > OK. Will the license change be backported to 0.48? That would avoid > repackaging the tarball. I've been told so: http://sourceforge.net/p/inkscape/mailman/message/32434309/ Ciao, Luca -- .''`. | ~<[ Luca BRUNO ~ (kaeso) ]>~ : :' : | Email: lucab (AT) debian.org ~ Debian Developer `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 0x3BFB9FB3 ~ Free Software supporter `-| HAM-radio callsign: IZ1WGT ~ Networking sorcerer signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
Control: tags -1 patch pending Hi, On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote: > Ivo De Decker wrote: > > > Matteo, are you planning to repacking the orig tarball in for 0.48 in > > unstable, or do you prefer an NMU for this? > > According to recent discussions, there should be a 0.48.5 pending. > We may also want to wait for it (IIRC that was the original plan). OK. Will the license change be backported to 0.48? That would avoid repackaging the tarball. Cheers, Ivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
Ivo De Decker wrote: > The inkscape upload in experimental contains the newer version, which > contains the new license, and thus fixes this bug. I don't know if > this version is expected to go to unstable soon, but if not, it might > be nice to have this fix backported. No, it is not intended to be uploaded to unstable soon. It was mostly an attempt to see if everything was ok. > Matteo, are you planning to repacking the orig tarball in for 0.48 in > unstable, or do you prefer an NMU for this? According to recent discussions, there should be a 0.48.5 pending. We may also want to wait for it (IIRC that was the original plan). > BTW I notice the CC licenses aren't mentioned in the copyright file. > This probably also is a serious issue. It looks like. If you directly want to address it, inkscape packaging is under git collab-maint. Ciao, Luca -- .''`. | ~<[ Luca BRUNO ~ (kaeso) ]>~ : :' : | Email: lucab (AT) debian.org ~ Debian Developer `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 0x3BFB9FB3 ~ Free Software supporter `-| HAM-radio callsign: IZ1WGT ~ Networking sorcerer signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:35:33AM -0400, Martin Owens wrote: > On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 10:11 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change > > might be retroactive? > > They are. The meta data can be updated. It's up to Debian if you want to > deb patch or a backport. We have a critical Ahaaa![1] to backport > anyway. > > Martin, > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/166371 Sweet! Thanks for the quick hacks, mo! (See you sunday!) Cheers, T -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 10:11 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change > might be retroactive? They are. The meta data can be updated. It's up to Debian if you want to deb patch or a backport. We have a critical Ahaaa![1] to backport anyway. Martin, [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/166371 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change might be retroactive? Thanks erryboddy! T On Sep 14, 2013 10:07 AM, "Alex Valavanis" wrote: > I think this is fixed upstream... all CC 2.0/2.5 licenses have been > removed from Inkscape trunk [1]. Can a patch be backported? > > AV > > [1] > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/revision/12514 > > On 13 September 2013 21:11, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote: > >> > Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors ? Maybe they > >> > intended GPL-2 anyway... > >> > >> I don't think so. The logo was contributed by jimmac and originally > >> under CC. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/345778 > >> > >> > Severity: serious > >> > > >> > that the Inkscape icon contains a statement suggesting that its > >> > license is CC-BY-SA 2.0. This is unfortunate, as Debian's FTP team > >> > does not consider it Free. > >> > >> I'm unsure about this. I remember an old thread on -project where it > >> was found that clause 4b of CC-BY-SA 2.0 allows upgrading to later > >> version, and several packages already fit in that case. > >> I think we are in the same case. > >> > >> Moreover, I can still get in touch with jimmac and ask for a license > >> change, or just apply clause 4b upstream. > > > > 4b only applies to derivitive works. I don't know who made this rumor, > > but it's resulted in a few REJECTs. > > > > Cheers, > >Paul > > > > > > -- > > .''`. Paul Tagliamonte > > : :' : Proud Debian Developer > > `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 > > `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag >
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
I think this is fixed upstream... all CC 2.0/2.5 licenses have been removed from Inkscape trunk [1]. Can a patch be backported? AV [1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/revision/12514 On 13 September 2013 21:11, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote: >> > Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors ? Maybe they >> > intended GPL-2 anyway... >> >> I don't think so. The logo was contributed by jimmac and originally >> under CC. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/345778 >> >> > Severity: serious >> > >> > that the Inkscape icon contains a statement suggesting that its >> > license is CC-BY-SA 2.0. This is unfortunate, as Debian's FTP team >> > does not consider it Free. >> >> I'm unsure about this. I remember an old thread on -project where it >> was found that clause 4b of CC-BY-SA 2.0 allows upgrading to later >> version, and several packages already fit in that case. >> I think we are in the same case. >> >> Moreover, I can still get in touch with jimmac and ask for a license >> change, or just apply clause 4b upstream. > > 4b only applies to derivitive works. I don't know who made this rumor, > but it's resulted in a few REJECTs. > > Cheers, >Paul > > > -- > .''`. Paul Tagliamonte > : :' : Proud Debian Developer > `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 > `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote: > > Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors ? Maybe they > > intended GPL-2 anyway... > > I don't think so. The logo was contributed by jimmac and originally > under CC. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/345778 > > > Severity: serious > > > > that the Inkscape icon contains a statement suggesting that its > > license is CC-BY-SA 2.0. This is unfortunate, as Debian's FTP team > > does not consider it Free. > > I'm unsure about this. I remember an old thread on -project where it > was found that clause 4b of CC-BY-SA 2.0 allows upgrading to later > version, and several packages already fit in that case. > I think we are in the same case. > > Moreover, I can still get in touch with jimmac and ask for a license > change, or just apply clause 4b upstream. 4b only applies to derivitive works. I don't know who made this rumor, but it's resulted in a few REJECTs. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
> Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors ? Maybe they > intended GPL-2 anyway... I don't think so. The logo was contributed by jimmac and originally under CC. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/345778 > Severity: serious > > that the Inkscape icon contains a statement suggesting that its > license is CC-BY-SA 2.0. This is unfortunate, as Debian's FTP team > does not consider it Free. I'm unsure about this. I remember an old thread on -project where it was found that clause 4b of CC-BY-SA 2.0 allows upgrading to later version, and several packages already fit in that case. I think we are in the same case. Moreover, I can still get in touch with jimmac and ask for a license change, or just apply clause 4b upstream. Cheers, Luca -- .''`. | ~<[ Luca BRUNO ~ (kaeso) ]>~ : :' : | Email: lucab (AT) debian.org ~ Debian Developer `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 0x3BFB9FB3 ~ Free Software supporter `-| HAM-radio callsign: IZ1WGT ~ Networking sorcerer signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#720618: non-free license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
Package: inkscape Version: 0.48.4-2 Severity: serious Hello, I just found by chance (because the inkscape icon is incorporated in the Sozi icon, https://github.com/senshu/Sozi/blob/master/editors/inkscape/sozi/icon.svg) that the Inkscape icon contains a statement suggesting that its license is CC-BY-SA 2.0. This is unfortunate, as Debian's FTP team does not consider it Free. Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors ? Maybe they intended GPL-2 anyway... Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
